Intel Core i7-10700K vs Intel Core i9-11900K - Test in 10 Games! [1080p, 1440p]
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 เม.ย. 2021
- ✔Intel Core i7-10700K
Amazon US flozes.com/a?shop=aus&id=1070...
Amazon CA flozes.com/a?shop=aca&id=1070...
Amazon UK flozes.com/a?shop=auk&id=1070...
Amazon DE flozes.com/a?shop=ade&id=1070...
Amazon IN flozes.com/a?shop=ain&id=1070...
AliExpress flozes.com/a?shop=ali&id=1070...
✔Intel Core i7-10700KF
Amazon US flozes.com/a?shop=aus&id=1070...
Amazon CA flozes.com/a?shop=aca&id=1070...
Amazon UK flozes.com/a?shop=auk&id=1070...
Amazon DE flozes.com/a?shop=ade&id=1070...
AliExpress flozes.com/a?shop=ali&id=1070...
✔Intel Core i9-11900K
Amazon US flozes.com/a?shop=aus&id=1190...
✔Intel Core i9-11900KF
Amazon US flozes.com/a?shop=aus&id=1190...
* As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
Hi, nice on screen overlay. How did you the gpu & cpu usage % with the graph together? Thx
For tests, a computer with a Live Gamer 4K video capture card - GC573 is used)
You can also use MSI afterburner
I updated from the 10700kf to the i9 11900kf and there are gains. Most are minimal. But on my specific regular games I play I have noticed significant gains that offset the cost of upgrading with a used i9.
Not bad)
11th support gen 4 m2 speeds , i'm deciding is it worth to upgrade from i7 10700k to i9 11900k. My m2 runs in gen 3 mode but with 11th gen it would increase speed.
Older video but VERY helpful. I'm trying to decide if the Rocket Lake cpu is worth upgrading over my Comet Lake.
We are glad that you liked our video)
Same boat. I want to upgrade my cpu but not my motherboard -_-
That is a very bad upgrade, a side grade at best if you're on 10700K. With tuned memory/ring it'll be pretty much the same as a tuned 11900K, but probably less power hungry for given core clocks + plus better latency.
@@HeartOfAdelyou are dead wrong. Tuned 11900K is a monster and supports extremely high RAM speeds. The performance uplift is substantial. It's like comparing the 9900K to 11900K. The difference should be 20% roughly in avg fps but the lows should be way better
@@ag8912 11900K doesn't run anywhere as high ram/ring speeds as 10700K without gear limits. A max oc 9900K sub 35ns latency is at worst 5-7% slower than maxed out 11900K, not to mention the insane power draw of 11900K to get there. And there are literally a couple of games when it's gonna be on par/even faster. It is a decent cpu by itself but very pathetic from a higher gen standpoint. If you believe in that 20% number then lol, good for you. 4400cl16 35ns 5ghz ring 10900K is better in gaming than max oc 11900K.
Hmmm i'm running a 10700k at mo, 15 to 20 fps better on 1440p on warzone might be worth the upgrade and get PCI4.0 support for the 3080 worth upgrading?
Tempted to just wait for Alderlake and sell 10700/mb/ram and start again
In principle, you can update)
You won’t have better perf with pci-e 4.0 for now . Keep your cpu and your money
These tests are all ran in 1080p. You would not likely see a 15 to 20 fps increase at 1440p.
@@kseries1981 are you high? the tests were at 1440p also.
besides some games being like a 10-15 fps difference on 1080p I also noticed that on some more cpu intensive games the 11900 ran at about 5-9% less of its max processing power
You are attentive)
isnt that what it supposed to be? It is a new generation overall
Yeah this guy has the 11900k set up wrong.
You need to try some CPU's side game, like Minecraft (with shaders)
To see a real difference between both CPU, they're all running at low %.
This is a pretty bad comparision tbh
Thank you for the addition)
10700к хорош. Если еще память ему сделать хотя бы 4100+ с16-17 и вторички с третичками настроить, ну и сам камень хотя бы 4.9, будет вполне годно еще много лет на нем сидеть. Да даже без разгона многим пойдет норм ) Скайлейк еще очень долго будет актуален.
Он хорош)
после этих манипуляций и цена вырастит)
@@DeviceLab цена незначительно поднимется, крушиалы балистиксы стоят вполне недорого, которые 3000с15 все берут 4000-4133 с16-с17, вторички тоже неплохо тюнятся, хоть и не бидаи, но тоже пойдет.
Ну а 4.8-4.9 для проца, это не 5.0 )) могут понадобиться вполне небольшая прибавка напряжения. Такой лайтовый разгон и недорогая башня на 6 трубок вытянет, а может и гаммакс 400 даже)
@@X18HACKER бро у меня 10700к и 3200 балики, что делать?:)
Намутил недавно топ жир z490 Waterforce на фуллкавер водоблоке. Поскольку 10850k/10900k/11700k/11900k по конченым ценам на авите - видимо придётся брать 10700к за 16к₽.
Какие-то плахи ещё завалялись 4000 сл16.
@@Hardware_PC Сейчас время не очень удачное для сборок. За 15-18к месяца 2-3 назад находил 10850к на авито. За 15 чел готов был отдать. Хотя все это уже не так интересно, когда даже 12600кф с ддр4 памятью его обгоняет в играх.
Кометы конечно еще могут и вполне себе круты, но актуальность уже не та)
По сути 12600кф 5.0+ и 4.0+ делает даже 11900к в играх, а в многопотоке он как раз как по мощности как 10/20 скайлековских ядер того же 10900к в разгоне.
I think I’ll hold onto my 10700k for a little longer 😂
This is a good stone)
@@DeviceLab dude english speakers do not call cpus stones...
@@HeartOfAdelas u could see ...we are not all eng speakers here so respect our dialect too .
@@sandro4076 I don't have anything against that dialect but people most likely won't understand what the hell that stone is 😂
Is it just a tiny bit better and is good for things like after effects
I agree)
I have the 10th gen i7-10700k with a rtx 3080 and until my aio's pump fail i was thinking of upgrading to the 11th gen. But seeing this i just need a bigger case (currently using the INWIN 303) which has no front or top mount for an aio cooler.. the rad is connected to this side cage which the psu blocks a quarter of my rads cooling system. I had only had the aio for 2 years but msi wont even give me an Rma for it. So i bought an asus rog 360 aio with a bigger hyte y70 case. My cyberpunk2077 game now lets me run on ultra with zero lag along with re dead redemption 2 and halo infinite which after playing for 45 mins is still cooling at 57 to 64c where as before the case and new aio my cpu temp would be in the 80's and sometimes low 90's (thats when id just turn it off) but i also got a new psu (MPG Msi 1000w psu with a 12VHPWR connector and a single cable that had 600 on both sides (the side that connects to the psu and the other side that i assume would plug into a rtx 40 something gpu.) I do plan on upgrading my gpu but it works for what i play and trying to spend 1500 to over 2100 on a gpu that i just dont currently need seems silly. If anything id rather get a gen 11 cpu just so i can use the extra m.2 slot on my mobo
Thanks for the comment)
I think that the 10700K is a solid sweetspot and will perform for a long time. Next jump up for me will undoubtedly be the 13th or 14th gen...
Thank you for the addition)
Thank you for the addition)
Thank you for the addition)
Thank you for the addition)
Thank you for the addition)
I have an i7 10700F, it is worth setting up to 10700K or 11700K
11700)
11700k. But honestly, unless you plan to seriously overclock it there is no point. Might as well save up for a new mobo and get the latest gen CPU from Intel or AMD.
This is why my 10700k is the end of the line for my motherboard. There is no point in getting Rocket Lake. Even if they sell the i9 for stupid cheap it's still not worth it. All your getting is pcie gen 4 and like tiny FPS gains.
It's sad(
@@DeviceLab Definitely a let down but I think the next few generations are gonna be on fire. Intel needed to fall behind to make the right calls to get off 14nm.
resizable bar too
@@bestyoutubernonegraternumber1 resizable bar is supposed to be supported back to 9th gen.
i find it weird that even when gpu bound the cpu still makes a slight difference
Nothing strange
@@DeviceLab do you know why that is? I would think if you’re gpu bound there really shouldn’t be a difference. (Not being snarky just trying to learn) 😅
Thx
Thank you for your comment)
CPU isnt the bottleneck.. not great tests to compare really. around 9% when GPU is not flat out
Thank you for your comment)
lmfao some people have actually payed $280 more for a 11900k , and their virtually identical 8 core / 16 threads , i mean this is absolute worse case scenario , with a more realistic 3070 or 3060ti these cpus would be twins in performance yet one cost $280 less , 10700k For the win for the smart folks
That would be a good choice)
I really don't see how you can say this when you are getting 10+ FPS in some of these games in 2K gaming. Yes some games there was maybe 2 FPS but some of these high end games that came out this year you are seeing 10+ FPS improvements. This is like a GPU upgrade, for $280 bucks. Sure if you are on a budget I get it but some ppl look at $280 for 10 FPS and say YES PLEASE...
yeah the FPs gain will be minimal between the Two but a i9 11900k can support a way more powerful GPU.
Thanks for the addition)
Thanks for the addition)
That is stock 10700k?
yes
@@DeviceLab WTF, poor benchmark if you don't overclock both CPUs to at least 5GHz or if GPU is overclocked
And no details on speed of RAM, that's very important if XMP is enabled or not
@@co-null5599 XMP 3600 all tests, I have different CPU comparisons, overclocked and not overclocked.
@@DeviceLab Can we see it ?
Tbh its the same so there is no reason of me upgrading
You don't need to update it)
What about 4k???
Here only 1080p, 1440p
But that’s a KF, not a K?
There are not much differences)
@@DeviceLab But they are still two different chips that perform differently.
Lmao I’ll just stick to my 10700k
So glad I bought the 10700k..... Not even the 10850k for $70 more is justifiable.
I think you guys are just looking at the average fps... also look at 1% and .1% lows. 10700k is consistently lower. It's important to have higher 1% and .1% lows so you don't have microstuttering while playing games.
@@CarC369 I get 0 microstutters. Paying $300 more for 15 FPS at the most isn’t worth it IMO
@@dm1972 Depends on what programs you're running while playing games. For the average user 10700k is more than enough, if fact a 10400k is enough.
Энергопотребление смотрите, разница почти в 2 раза иногда. Я тут сменил 10700к на 11900к и это ппц какая жесткая печка. Имхо это того вообще не стоит
Благодарю за отзыв о ней)
Все относительно. Я вчера поменял 10700 на 11900kf (на b560 материнку) и выставив на второй лимит краткосрочный в 230 ватт а долгосрочный в 160 ватт не увидел большой разницы по температурам со старым процом. Виной тому 2 обстоятельства: 1-водяное охлаждение, 2 - припой под крышкой проца с литерой К. Выше 80-90 ватт в киберпанке на ультрах я не увидел, но почувствовал нереально плавную картинку и отсутствие подтормаживаний в моменты автосохранения (а раньше они у меня были, хоть все и на 2 Nvme накопителях стоит). Как то так. Объективно, имея i7 10 или 11 поколения смысла переходить на i9 нет, но лично я перешел так как не планирую к покупке 12 линейку - уж больно большие затраты. Кстати даже на в560 матери и в играх и в большинстве бенчмарков ядра бустятся до 5,1 Ггц, а местами и до 5.2 если температура позволяет.
upd.
У меня 10700k работал в разгоне на 4.8 по всем ядрам с напряжением п в 1.25В, сейчас я 11900k выставил на 4.9 (шина 4.3) по всем ядрам и напряжением в 1.23В, следующий стабильный шаг это 5.0 и напруга 1.29В, но при этом нагрев от проца становится значительно больше, до такой степени что я начинаю это телом ощущать. У меня тоже водянка стоит, но двухсекционная, по субъективным ощущениям, если проц жрет не больше 100 Вт, то еще норм рядом сидеть, но если там под 150-160 то это уже адище. Короче говоря мой апгрейд вылился в то, что новый проц работает почти на тех же параметрами что и старый)))
@@subterfug3x Я если честно понять не могу как на не z чипсете у меня проц автоматом так гонится... я надеялся на 4.8 Ггц на моей материнке, но нет. Буду дольше посмотреть. Кстати, вам мог попасться неудачный камень - такое в отзывах читал. Тоже не гнались выше определенных, довольно безобидных частот.
@@subterfug3x Еще раз замерил: после часа игры в киберпанк (все на ультрах) получил среднее значение в мониторинге OCCT в 112 ватт. Колебалось от 60 до 140 где то. Питальник материнки нагрелся при таком раскладе до 60 максимум.
Frametime / ms is most important for smooth gameplay with 144hz monitor and above.. trust me .. i use i3 10100f before then upgrade to i7 10700 ..
Fps seem different only 10-15 for old rx 570 gpu .. but the smooth of gameplay is massive ..
For this benchmark i9 win because low latency frametime . No joke serius 👌
Thank you for the comment)
When i saw that you put grass ultra in gta v , i imediatly stop that video , its not optimised , and fps are not real because even if you have rtx 4000Serie and intel 12 th gen it will be same
Ultra grass really affects FPS, but this is noticeable only in locations where it is.
I compare in a city location.
Confused unga bunga
Excuse me what?)
Yessir
lol
Is it just me or is the 3090 constantly maintaining slightly higher boost on the 11th gen? which seems to result in a huge power increase for the gpu?
the low %'s seem to be a constant improvement on 11th gen too
Out of interest, is either a computer you use often, wondering if you find 11th gen better or worse day to day or much the same?
This is really observed)
где 4 к ? такие камни берут не чтобы в фулхд катать ))
В основном рассматрмвают 1080p, 1440p
So for 1440p my 10700k is fine
thank you for your feedback)
Warzone VRAM WTF?!
Holy shit
вы дурачки😂? тестить процессоры надо вам на низких настирйках качества 🎉 Привет из России- страны где живут умные люди.
Это почему?)
@@DeviceLab потому что больше нагрузки на процессор идет при низких настройках графики и минимальном разрешении. На максималках больше нагружается видеокарта.