He displays somewhat odd mannerisms while considering his response to Lane’s questions. Understandable, given he’d already survived a silencing attempt.
I love that there are some people on this Earth who care as much as family man Mr. Reynolds did, as Roger Craig did, about the truth. Especially when it comes to defending what JFK stood for and real answers to what happened. I have personally experienced (very simple, personal) times when more than just a physical world was signaling to me and while it may be impolite to write about that and immediately follow it with this; I do hope that Hunt, the Cabell father and 2 sons, Dulles, Gerry Ford, Curtis Lemay and a list of their other co-conspirators are in the hell that they earned for themselves. No one bats an eye when this sort of thing happens overseas (and then, there are many who don't understand even that). We must stop it overseas as well as acknowledge when it has happened here. We certainly can can change the world. It was not many years ago that electric cars were laughable to all but a few. Showing the herd the way is possible, in other words.
He does seem a little different, but that could be because he suffered a little bit because of the gun shot that he took so that might cause of the act the way he does
We all know it was a conspiracy. I mean look at all the people that died that were slightly involved in this witnesses etc. like Betty McDonald. It’s a joke we will never know who did it never but we know it was not Oswald.
If Oswald acted alone, there wouldn't of been a roomful of Parkland medical personnel that assured interviewers that a bullet hit Kennedy in the front of the forehead with a large exit out of the right posterior. That alone negates much, if not all of the lone gunman theory pushed so desperately by LBJ and Hoover.
Rubbish, Oswald was ID'd by nearly a dozen witnesses as shooting Tippit and fleeing. What the hell is the POINT of attacking a cop on a public street???
Oswald was ID'd by nearly a dozen witnesses. Oswald owned and was in possession of the gun the shells were matched to. Oswald discarded his jacket between the crime scene and the theater. Oswald was plainly seen trying to hide from passing police. Oswald was plainly seen ducking into a theater to dodge more passing police. Oswald was caught red-handed trying to shoot a second cop. Oswald fought police so violently 3 officers were injured just disarming him. Oswald observed, "Well, they say it only takes a minute to die" after asking about the penalty for cop-killing. Looking forward to you explaining what "Plan B" was if Tippit simply outdrew and captured his attacker, blowing the whole plot...
Harvey was already in the theater. Lee and accomplices executed Tippit. Lee then led 50 officers away from both the assassination and Tippit scenes to the Texas Theater. Lee was arrested in the balcony. Harvey was arrested on the main floor. Harvey was led out of the front door. Lee was taken out of the back door.
@@dphinman6952 Demonstrably untrue. Enough with this goofy Mission: Impossible-style paranoia already. The bloody theater was surrounded by witnesses and police officers at all times, for crying out loud.
The fact they're saying it's wild speculation that this guy was shot and a connection to tippit shooting was untenable proves actually how likely it was just by the token they're defending the possibility of it.
Apparently, by the time the Warren Commission's report was published (September 24, 1964), some folks were already mighty suspicious about witnesses being ghosted.
I read that the police department fraud bureau had complaints about the used car business he worked at. I wouldn’t be surprised if a disgruntled customer tried to get him
@@Shark_King325 Lee Bowers: a) His words make it clear enough he saw diddly squat, and certainly nothing that would threaten any "conspiracy." b) He didn't die until some two years after he had already testified and if hypothetically he changed his story at that point it was be a piece of cake to dismiss him as a lying opportunist without credibility. c) His car accident was investigated by the police, the HSCA and by researcher David Perry, none of whom found any evidence for murder.
@@aaronz7056 a) The man is a navy veteran and said that he saw a flash of light and immediately saw smoke coming from the embankment where the wooden picket fence was. I think he would know better than yourself or I would. The same area he claimed he saw 2 suspicious men hanging around. Also trying to deflect immediately to insults instead of discussion tells me the type of person you are especially when you use words like “diddly squat”. Lmao what? b) Lee Bowers never officially testified, he gave his testimony to local reporters and died before he could officially tell his story before the Warren Commission c) Yes the government investigated and found no evidence that the government was involved, shocker. Plus you say he wasn’t “murdered” yet his car was rammed off the road by another car who drove off and that was never properly investigated any further.
@@aaronz7056 OF course not. No CIA Involvement whatsoever, other than George DeMorenschildt, Ruth Paine, Michael Paine, David Ferrie, Captain Westbrook, etc etc. And the convenient main man on the Commission Allen Dulles.
@@aaronz7056 what are the chances of actually getting physical evidence from the f-ing secretive, anti-american f-ing CIA? Talk about moving the goal post. I'll err on the side of pointing a finger sincer a conspiracy clearly took place.
He originally said he thought the man was Oswald but he would hesitate to positively ID him, which would have suited any conspiracy just fine. Later he agreed the man must have been Oswald, so his memory hardly "improved" much at all, never mind he was hardly the lynchpin in this case anyway. What the heck is the point of attacking a cop on a public street in the first place??? Kennedy is already dead, Oswald is already being sought anyway, and if anything goes wrong here, such as Tippit simply outdrawing and capturing his attacker, they just end up confirming a conspiracy exists.
@@aaronz7056 Once you listen long enough to Aaronz's schtick you will realize that every witness who is shaky and or changes their story (in this case after being shot at by a friend of Jack Ruby) you will see Aaronz will either ignore them or herald them as a key witness depending on if their words support the WR. It doesn't matter that the shooter of Reynolds was let off because his alibi said she was with him ( a Jack Ruby Stripper) It doesn't matter that she would later hang herself in Jail after her arrest. None of those key facts matter. Only that Reynolds with the forgetful memory came to his senses. LOL
Needless to say, I already explained above about Reynolds' case and you simply ignored every word of it, and here, of course, is what you are saying happened: a) A conspiracy arranged to shoot Reynolds, even though Oswald was dead anyway and it would be rather suspicious if Reynolds died of his wound. b) Darrell Garner must have been the shooter. c) Nancy Mooney aka Betty MacDonald, must have somehow learned that Garner shot Reynolds at behest of a conspiracy. d) Either she was persuaded or forced to protect Garner, or she learned some sinister information. e) Conspirators decided to take advantage of Mooney's arrest to murder her in her jail cell. f) This was a better idea than simply bumping her off at a different time and making it look like a home invasion or a mugging. g) They persuaded her jailers to help murder her, thus dragging still more conspirators into this plot. h) They arranged it so neither the cell nor her body would show any signs of struggle. i) They arranged it so that not only would the autopsy back this up, but it would also confirm the marks on her caused by previous suicide attempts it's documented she made, including one where a friend saved her from gassing herself. She was despondent at losing custody of her kids, as confirmed by friends, and was drinking the night of her death. j) Their ideal hitman to shoot Reynolds was an alcoholic blabbermouth living out of his car, a local man well known already in Oak Cliff. By the way, there is no evidence Mooney ever worked for Ruby as a stripper, other employees and the guy who hired dancers for Ruby's club couldn't identify her as a former employee.
@@aaronz7056 I like the hundreds of others you try to pimp with your WR drivel have told you, when every part of the Assassination leads to the CIA, Jack Ruby and the Mob, and a Very Clumsy Cover-up, people are smart enough to figure this out. You on the other hand are a minnow swimming upstream, and you simply parrot Posner Nonsense. Yes, Darrel Garner was a mob friend of Jack Ruby and yes his job was to get rid of Reynolds. And yes, Nancy Mooney was a fake alibi to get the hitman off. And she had to be silenced, so she was murdered an hour after being arrested IN JAIL. Geezus Aaron, are you seriously not able to comprehend this, with the mountain of evidence? Is everyone a liar? I hope you are getting a check, because it is painful to watch you make a fool of yourself.
"They" very obviously got to him prior to the interview, based on his extremely strange demeanor and facial expressions immediately prior to answering the questions. As a 30+ year veteran in law enforcement, l can state with absolute certainty that this indicates that he is giving heavily scripted answers.
"Did not make a positive identification...", this is somewhat ambiguous. Did Reynolds actually say matter-of-factly that the gunman he had seen was certainly not depicted in those three photos he was shown by the two FBI agents on Jan 21, 1964? Did Reynolds believe at that time that Lee Harvey Oswald was not the gunman?
Yep then he got shot about 3 months latter and family threatened then he changed his story and said it was Oswald when at first he described ruby or braden
He had said he thought the man was Oswald but would hesitate to positively ID him... which would have suited any conspiracy just fine. Later he agreed the man must have been Oswald. His memory hardly "improved" much at all.
@@gregoryfrickey1715 What the heck is the logic of attacking a cop on public street at all since if anything goes wrong here, such as Tippit simply outdrawing and capturing his attacker, they will just end up confirming a conspiracy exists?
@@aaronz7056 "Already being sought" He was calmly watching a movie and even ordered popcorn after enjoying a soda in the break room at the Book Depository. That is not the frantic moves of a killer on the run. Or someone looking for fame.
The notion that a shooter armed with a revolver, would pause at a crime scene. To dump the empty casings / evidence on the ground prior to leaving is a reach for sure. Then there is the semi auto casings recovered story. The whole deal is crazy. Right there with chosing to shoot the presisident from his work place window. During his lunch break with a weapon registered to himself.
@@metv2363 That's a brilliant, nuanced, logical, persuasive, intelligent, and relative observation, congrats on your wisdom and insight. Oh, and Oswald was plainly SEEN emptying the revolver anyway...
@@palnikolaiisnes7804 Blank you too, buddy, whatever. As I just said, Oswald was seen emptying the revolver himself, he was ID'd by nearly a dozen witnesses as shooting Tippit and fleeing, he owned and was in possession of the gun the shells were matched to, he was caught red-handed trying to shoot a second cop and fighting so violently 3 officers were injured just disarming him, and I don't see you making the slightest attempt to offer up any credible or plausible alternate scenario here.
Well that was one strange, odd, bizarre interview. Hello!!!! That guy was under duress. He looked like a Vietnam POW with his eyes constantly wandering over to his rt. Weird 💩💩💩💩
"Well that was one strange, odd, bizarre interview. Hello!!!! That guy was under duress. He looked like a Vietnam POW with his eyes constantly wandering over to his rt. Weird": How old are you?
Fascinating Video. His mannerisms are very curious. Interesting that he could not positively identify Oswald until he himself was shot in the head. Funny, or tragic depending on how you look at it, that it takes that kind of experience to jar your memory and change your perspective...
Reynolds initially said he thought the man was Oswald but would hesitate to positively ID him... which would have suited any conspiracy just fine. Later he agreed the man must have been Oswald, so his memory hardly "improved" much at all, never mind that he was hardly the lynchpin of the case anyway.
@@steve8510 What the hell did I literally just say? Besides which, what happens if Reynolds dies of his wound? THAT wouldn't look suspicious, would it? No doubt you will now explain who actually shot down a cop on a public street....
In the James e files interview. Files says a hit man was after Oswald and the hit man killed the officer. Files says he knows who it was but won’t say cause he could still be alive.
*_How can so many different eyewitnesses give such different statements? Some say it was two people who shot Tippit. Some say it was Oswald who shot Tippit. Another says it was Jack Ruby who shot Tippit. Another says it was Roscoe White who shot Tippit. Which of these is correct?_*
From what I've learned; there was between 70-90 "mysterious deaths"; of witnesses; in the years following the Assignation! This man is lucky to have survived! Of course he changed his story afterwards! * I believe that it was Roscoe White, or Curtis Crafard that shot Officer Tippit. Along with Captain Westbrook and Sergeant Kenneth Croy. CONSPIRACY On so many levels! If we can figure out Tippet's role in the JFK murder-- I think we will have figured out the whole thing...
Oswald was ID'd by nearly a dozen witnesses as shooting Tippit and fleeing. The shells were matched to his gun, which he owned and was in possession of. Oswald was caught red-handed minutes later trying to shoot a second cop. Oswald observed, "Well, they say it only takes a minute to die" after asking about the penalty for cop-killing. Clemons' words make it clear enough she saw at best a shooter and bystander who was almost certainly Benavides of Cimino, she didn't even see the actual shooting, and other witnesses much closer to Tippit than Clemons said there was but one shooter. There is no point in attacking a cop on a public street just to frame Oswald as he was already being sought for Kennedy's murder anyway. There is no logic in attacking a cop since if anything goes wrong here, such as the cop simply outdrawing and capturing his attacker, they will just end up confirming a conspiracy exists.
@@kimmiller6509 "Mysterious deaths list of witness" is an hilarious hoax where everybody on it either had little or not connection to the case or else their causes of death were misreported to sound more "sinister." What the heck do you mean "Tippit's role" in the assassination? Along those lines there is zero evidence Westbrook and Croy were part of some plot, but that doesn't stop crackpot armchair detectives from happily giving their middle fingers to those men's families as they accuse them so long as it suits their "theories." Oswald was ID'd by nearly a dozen witnesses, shells were matched to his gun, he was caught minutes later trying to shoot a second cop, and he observed "Well, they say it only takes a minute to die" after asking about the penalty for cop-killing.
"How can so many different eyewitnesses give such different statements?": They all said it was def Oswald or they thought it was - absolutely no eyewitness of the Tippit murder ever said it was Ruby or "Roscoe White"; that's just now in these posts by conspiracy people.
From what I've learned; there was between 70-90 "mysterious deaths"; of witnesses": That's one of the more bizarre conspiracy myths that people buy into. Sigh.
You asked a “used car” salesman to tell the truth?!? 😂 Of course he lies His mouth is open! 😂😂 Joking of course. Man seemed credible, though odd. I was a used car salesman in another life.
"Man seemed credible, though odd": All he said was that he saw the shooter (didn't say it wasn't Oswald, btw, lol), was interviewed about it and then got shot not long after.
The gunman shot him from above? (Concluded by the direction of the bullet) With a rifle from one foot distance? (As testified towards the Warren Commission) He saw the gunman coming up from of his basement and could not give a proper physical description. But he recognized Oswald from 450 ft distance?
"The gunman shot him from above? (Concluded by the direction of the bullet) With a rifle from one foot distance? (As testified towards the Warren Commission) He saw the gunman coming up from of his basement and could not give a proper physical description. But he recognized Oswald from 450 ft distance?": Please explain why you think you made any sense there.
@@MichaelMiller-op5sx OR a train wreck! (apollo 1 fire inspector thomas Baron) "Psycho" Police Commissioner... sticking his tongue out after talking ((th-cam.com/video/hWuB7s2ev1I/w-d-xo.html))Gets Exposed By Constitutional Auditor
@@terrykrall I won't reveal it here because people take a look at the few, most common photos of him and disagree. There's a video on a different channel that focuses on this shooting only and that has a more complete description of the events leading up to the shooting, etcetera. Good for you for being curious but this is one that people should earn because just a quick answer to let them get back to their other distractions isn't enough.
@@aaronz7056 Oh, we're all SO glad that you added the "LOL". EVERY peer reviewed document that I have ever read used only "LOL" as evidence, as you have.
Reynolds initially said he thought the man he saw was Oswald but would hesitate to positively ID him... which would have suited any "conspiracy" just fine. Later he agreed the man must have been Oswald, so his memory hardly "improved" much at all, never mind that he was hardly the lynchpin of the case anyway.
@@kevinbrennan-ji1so I have said nothing in accurate, ya paranoid. Looking forward to you explaining what the heck the point is in attacking a cop on a public street is in the first place, since Oswald is already being sought anyway and if anything goes wrong here they will just end up confirming a conspiracy exists.
@@kevinbrennan-ji1so No, actually what a said is demonstrably true. No doubt you will now explain: - what the hell the POINT is of attacking a cop on a public street in the first place since Kennedy dead and Oswald is already being sought anyway - what the hell the LOGIC is of attacking a cop since if anything goes wrong here, such as Tippit simply outdrawing and capturing his attacker, they will just end up confirming a conspiracy exists - how the bad guys could have been certain the Dallas PD was guaranteed to be on board for the successful escape from justice of the "real killers" of a brother officer with a wife and 3 children....
@@kevinbrennan-ji1so No doubt you will then: a) explain persuasively what I said that was inaccurate... b) explain who the hell DID shoot Tippit c) explain what the hell the point or logic is in attacking a cop on a public street since Oswald is already being sought for Kennedy anyway and if anything goes wrong here, such as Tippit simply outdrawing and capturing his attacker, they simply blow the whole plot and confirm a conspiracy exists...
So if Reynolds supposedly didn't make a positive ID of Oswald, why in the world would anyone need to "silence" him? That is just a stupid conspiracy story. If Reynolds had seen someone other than Oswald after the shooting, Mark Lane would have had Reynolds saying he hadn't seen Oswald. Lane merely makes an extremely weak implication of a connection.
If the gunman who killed Officer Tippit wasn't Oswald, why then was Oswald seen going into the movie theater where he was arrested???? And how would he be carrying the gun that was later identified as the gun that killed Officer Tippit???
1) Because Oswald was part of the conspiracy. We don’t know in what way. He was not a shooter. He had long been an intelligence operative, and he knew David Ferrie and Guy Bannister. 2) The gun that killed Tippit was an automatic. Oswald was found carrying a .38 revolver that didn’t even function.
FBI intimidation is still a thing today.
He displays somewhat odd mannerisms while considering his response to Lane’s questions. Understandable, given he’d already survived a silencing attempt.
He did seem to be choosing his words carefully without volunteering any more information than what was asked.
I love that there are some people on this Earth who care as much as family man Mr. Reynolds did, as Roger Craig did, about the truth. Especially when it comes to defending what JFK stood for and real answers to what happened. I have personally experienced (very simple, personal) times when more than just a physical world was signaling to me and while it may be impolite to write about that and immediately follow it with this; I do hope that Hunt, the Cabell father and 2 sons, Dulles, Gerry Ford, Curtis Lemay and a list of their other co-conspirators are in the hell that they earned for themselves. No one bats an eye when this sort of thing happens overseas (and then, there are many who don't understand even that). We must stop it overseas as well as acknowledge when it has happened here.
We certainly can can change the world. It was not many years ago that electric cars were laughable to all but a few. Showing the herd the way is possible, in other words.
He does seem a little different, but that could be because he suffered a little bit because of the gun shot that he took so that might cause of the act the way he does
We all know it was a conspiracy. I mean look at all the people that died that were slightly involved in this witnesses etc. like Betty McDonald. It’s a joke we will never know who did it never but we know it was not Oswald.
@hippieal no he survived a killing and is a little gun shy now
If Oswald acted alone I’m not sure anyone would have tried to kill this guy….
If Oswald acted alone, there wouldn't of been a roomful of Parkland medical personnel that assured interviewers that a bullet hit Kennedy in the front of the forehead with a large exit out of the right posterior. That alone negates much, if not all of the lone gunman theory pushed so desperately by LBJ and Hoover.
He was shot because he has seen the murderer of Tippit and that was not Oswald.
Rubbish, Oswald was ID'd by nearly a dozen witnesses as shooting Tippit and fleeing. What the hell is the POINT of attacking a cop on a public street???
Oswald was ID'd by nearly a dozen witnesses.
Oswald owned and was in possession of the gun the shells were matched to.
Oswald discarded his jacket between the crime scene and the theater.
Oswald was plainly seen trying to hide from passing police.
Oswald was plainly seen ducking into a theater to dodge more passing police.
Oswald was caught red-handed trying to shoot a second cop.
Oswald fought police so violently 3 officers were injured just disarming him.
Oswald observed, "Well, they say it only takes a minute to die" after asking about the penalty for cop-killing.
Looking forward to you explaining what "Plan B" was if Tippit simply outdrew and captured his attacker, blowing the whole plot...
@@aaronz7056I understand everything you just said there which is true but who is trying to kill this man after Oswald was killed?
Harvey was already in the theater.
Lee and accomplices executed Tippit.
Lee then led 50 officers away from both the assassination and Tippit scenes to the Texas Theater.
Lee was arrested in the balcony.
Harvey was arrested on the main floor.
Harvey was led out of the front door.
Lee was taken out of the back door.
@@dphinman6952 Demonstrably untrue. Enough with this goofy Mission: Impossible-style paranoia already. The bloody theater was surrounded by witnesses and police officers at all times, for crying out loud.
The fact they're saying it's wild speculation that this guy was shot and a connection to tippit shooting was untenable proves actually how likely it was just by the token they're defending the possibility of it.
Apparently, by the time the Warren Commission's report was published (September 24, 1964), some folks were already mighty suspicious about witnesses being ghosted.
I read that the police department fraud bureau had complaints about the used car business he worked at. I wouldn’t be surprised if a disgruntled customer tried to get him
So many witnesses paid with their lives!
Okay, let's have some names: WHO "paid with their lives..."
@@aaronz7056 an interesting read: spartacus-educational.com/JFKreynolds.htm
@@aaronz7056Lee Bowers
@@Shark_King325 Lee Bowers:
a) His words make it clear enough he saw diddly squat, and certainly nothing that would threaten any "conspiracy."
b) He didn't die until some two years after he had already testified and if hypothetically he changed his story at that point it was be a piece of cake to dismiss him as a lying opportunist without credibility.
c) His car accident was investigated by the police, the HSCA and by researcher David Perry, none of whom found any evidence for murder.
@@aaronz7056
a) The man is a navy veteran and said that he saw a flash of light and immediately saw smoke coming from the embankment where the wooden picket fence was. I think he would know better than yourself or I would. The same area he claimed he saw 2 suspicious men hanging around. Also trying to deflect immediately to insults instead of discussion tells me the type of person you are especially when you use words like “diddly squat”. Lmao what?
b) Lee Bowers never officially testified, he gave his testimony to local reporters and died before he could officially tell his story before the Warren Commission
c) Yes the government investigated and found no evidence that the government was involved, shocker. Plus you say he wasn’t “murdered” yet his car was rammed off the road by another car who drove off and that was never properly investigated any further.
CIA HIT!!!!
No evidence for that.
@@aaronz7056 OF course not. No CIA Involvement whatsoever, other than George DeMorenschildt, Ruth Paine, Michael Paine, David Ferrie, Captain Westbrook, etc etc. And the convenient main man on the Commission Allen Dulles.
@@aaronz7056 sellout
@@aaronz7056 what are the chances of actually getting physical evidence from the f-ing secretive, anti-american f-ing CIA? Talk about moving the goal post. I'll err on the side of pointing a finger sincer a conspiracy clearly took place.
@@bijoubijoux5185 Oh, well, in that case, since I'm a "sellout," no doubt YOU will now provide the evidence this was a "CIA hit," yes?
after he got shot he changed his story so sad 🙏
He originally said he thought the man was Oswald but he would hesitate to positively ID him, which would have suited any conspiracy just fine. Later he agreed the man must have been Oswald, so his memory hardly "improved" much at all, never mind he was hardly the lynchpin in this case anyway. What the heck is the point of attacking a cop on a public street in the first place??? Kennedy is already dead, Oswald is already being sought anyway, and if anything goes wrong here, such as Tippit simply outdrawing and capturing his attacker, they just end up confirming a conspiracy exists.
@@aaronz7056 Once you listen long enough to Aaronz's schtick you will realize that every witness who is shaky and or changes their story (in this case after being shot at by a friend of Jack Ruby) you will see Aaronz will either ignore them or herald them as a key witness depending on if their words support the WR. It doesn't matter that the shooter of Reynolds was let off because his alibi said she was with him ( a Jack Ruby Stripper) It doesn't matter that she would later hang herself in Jail after her arrest. None of those key facts matter. Only that Reynolds with the forgetful memory came to his senses. LOL
Needless to say, I already explained above about Reynolds' case and you simply ignored every word of it, and here, of course, is what you are saying happened:
a) A conspiracy arranged to shoot Reynolds, even though Oswald was dead anyway and it would be rather suspicious if Reynolds died of his wound.
b) Darrell Garner must have been the shooter.
c) Nancy Mooney aka Betty MacDonald, must have somehow learned that Garner shot Reynolds at behest of a conspiracy.
d) Either she was persuaded or forced to protect Garner, or she learned some sinister information.
e) Conspirators decided to take advantage of Mooney's arrest to murder her in her jail cell.
f) This was a better idea than simply bumping her off at a different time and making it look like a home invasion or a mugging.
g) They persuaded her jailers to help murder her, thus dragging still more conspirators into this plot.
h) They arranged it so neither the cell nor her body would show any signs of struggle.
i) They arranged it so that not only would the autopsy back this up, but it would also confirm the marks on her caused by previous suicide attempts it's documented she made, including one where a friend saved her from gassing herself. She was despondent at losing custody of her kids, as confirmed by friends, and was drinking the night of her death.
j) Their ideal hitman to shoot Reynolds was an alcoholic blabbermouth living out of his car, a local man well known already in Oak Cliff.
By the way, there is no evidence Mooney ever worked for Ruby as a stripper, other employees and the guy who hired dancers for Ruby's club couldn't identify her as a former employee.
@@aaronz7056 nobody on these sites listens to your bullet points. think this is a deep state account. 100% conspiracy quit denying reality.
@@aaronz7056 I like the hundreds of others you try to pimp with your WR drivel have told you, when every part of the Assassination leads to the CIA, Jack Ruby and the Mob, and a Very Clumsy Cover-up, people are smart enough to figure this out. You on the other hand are a minnow swimming upstream, and you simply parrot Posner Nonsense. Yes, Darrel Garner was a mob friend of Jack Ruby and yes his job was to get rid of Reynolds. And yes, Nancy Mooney was a fake alibi to get the hitman off. And she had to be silenced, so she was murdered an hour after being arrested IN JAIL. Geezus Aaron, are you seriously not able to comprehend this, with the mountain of evidence? Is everyone a liar? I hope you are getting a check, because it is painful to watch you make a fool of yourself.
😢😢😢Oh my God
"They" very obviously got to him prior to the interview, based on his extremely strange demeanor and facial expressions immediately prior to answering the questions. As a 30+ year veteran in law enforcement, l can state with absolute certainty that this indicates that he is giving heavily scripted answers.
As a 30+ year veteran in law enforcement, l can state with absolute certainty that this indicates that he is giving heavily scripted answers: PHONEY
@@peterfraser9070Correction: It's actually spelled "PHONY".
@@frank3508 Okay, that's true, but that doesn't mean your theories are real.
@@peterfraser9070 Sorry to disappoint you 😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣
I was thinking the same thing as I watched this interview
"Did not make a positive identification...", this is somewhat ambiguous. Did Reynolds actually say matter-of-factly that the gunman he had seen was certainly not depicted in those three photos he was shown by the two FBI agents on Jan 21, 1964? Did Reynolds believe at that time that Lee Harvey Oswald was not the gunman?
Yep then he got shot about 3 months latter and family threatened then he changed his story and said it was Oswald when at first he described ruby or braden
He got shot 2 days later on the 23rd of January '64.
@@MichaelMiller-op5sxNot true.
He had said he thought the man was Oswald but would hesitate to positively ID him... which would have suited any conspiracy just fine. Later he agreed the man must have been Oswald. His memory hardly "improved" much at all.
@aaronz7056 after the corrupt police and CIA shot him in his head and threatened his family he changed his story to satisfy the cronies
ANOTHER WITNESS
Another witness they tried to bump off
WELL THEY SHUT HIM UP FAST..........
@@HooDie-Trench-GoTh2022 What the heck is the point of attacking a cop on a public street since Oswald is already being sought anyway???
@@gregoryfrickey1715 What the heck is the logic of attacking a cop on public street at all since if anything goes wrong here, such as Tippit simply outdrawing and capturing his attacker, they will just end up confirming a conspiracy exists?
@@aaronz7056 "Already being sought" He was calmly watching a movie and even ordered popcorn after enjoying a soda in the break room at the Book Depository. That is not the frantic moves of a killer on the run. Or someone looking for fame.
Did he see G Gordon Liddy shoot Tippet
No, it was Mac Wallace(?).
@@twistedNutzz326 Mac Wallace was on the sixth floor. Maybe he had time to help Liddy. They say there were two people shooting at Tippet
@@twistedNutzz326 Mac Wallace was on the sixth floor. Maybe he had time to help Liddy. They say there were two people shooting at Tippet
It was Liddy and Ruby
@@MichaelMiller-op5sx May have been Ruby knew Tippet from what I hear
G Gordon liddy was working for FBI , Oswald was FBI and Ruby was FBI informant
Oswald was O.N.I. and FBI informant. Ruby was The Outfit, Chicago Illinois.
So he told DPD he saw the man with a gun and chased him....Then someone came back and tried to kill him.....HUMMMMMM
Never ever heard of this whole thing. Omg!
The notion that a shooter armed with a revolver, would pause at a crime scene. To dump the empty casings / evidence on the ground prior to leaving is a reach for sure. Then there is the semi auto casings recovered story. The whole deal is crazy. Right there with chosing to shoot the presisident from his work place window. During his lunch break with a weapon registered to himself.
Yeah, it's almost like Oswald was crazy or something.
@@aaronz7056, he couldn't have been any crazier than you are.
@@metv2363 That's a brilliant, nuanced, logical, persuasive, intelligent, and relative observation, congrats on your wisdom and insight.
Oh, and Oswald was plainly SEEN emptying the revolver anyway...
Metv2363. You speak the ultimate truth there for certain.
@@palnikolaiisnes7804 Blank you too, buddy, whatever. As I just said, Oswald was seen emptying the revolver himself, he was ID'd by nearly a dozen witnesses as shooting Tippit and fleeing, he owned and was in possession of the gun the shells were matched to, he was caught red-handed trying to shoot a second cop and fighting so violently 3 officers were injured just disarming him, and I don't see you making the slightest attempt to offer up any credible or plausible alternate scenario here.
Who says that Reynolds didn't make apositive identification of Oswald?
I think this video has been edited!
This guy, pausing and looking at the camera just doesn't look too good. Nevertheless, his shooting is a very suspicious incident.
👀 👀 👀 👀 👀 👀
Old MacDonald had a farm…
Well that was one strange, odd, bizarre interview. Hello!!!! That guy was under duress. He looked like a Vietnam POW with his eyes constantly wandering over to his rt. Weird 💩💩💩💩
"Well that was one strange, odd, bizarre interview. Hello!!!! That guy was under duress. He looked like a Vietnam POW with his eyes constantly wandering over to his rt. Weird": How old are you?
Something not right here…
Fascinating Video. His mannerisms are very curious. Interesting that he could not positively identify Oswald until he himself was shot in the head. Funny, or tragic depending on how you look at it, that it takes that kind of experience to jar your memory and change your perspective...
Reynolds initially said he thought the man was Oswald but would hesitate to positively ID him... which would have suited any conspiracy just fine. Later he agreed the man must have been Oswald, so his memory hardly "improved" much at all, never mind that he was hardly the lynchpin of the case anyway.
Yeah attempted silencing's will do that.
@@steve8510 What the hell did I literally just say? Besides which, what happens if Reynolds dies of his wound? THAT wouldn't look suspicious, would it? No doubt you will now explain who actually shot down a cop on a public street....
@@aaronz7056 You didn't say it literally Jethro.
@@steve8510 You ignored my questions, thanks anyway.
In the James e files interview. Files says a hit man was after Oswald and the hit man killed the officer. Files says he knows who it was but won’t say cause he could still be alive.
*_How can so many different eyewitnesses give such different statements? Some say it was two people who shot Tippit. Some say it was Oswald who shot Tippit. Another says it was Jack Ruby who shot Tippit. Another says it was Roscoe White who shot Tippit. Which of these is correct?_*
From what I've learned; there was between 70-90 "mysterious deaths"; of witnesses; in the years following the Assignation!
This man is lucky to have survived!
Of course he changed his story afterwards!
* I believe that it was Roscoe White, or Curtis Crafard that shot Officer Tippit.
Along with Captain Westbrook and Sergeant Kenneth Croy.
CONSPIRACY
On so many levels!
If we can figure out Tippet's role in the JFK murder--
I think we will have figured out the whole thing...
Oswald was ID'd by nearly a dozen witnesses as shooting Tippit and fleeing.
The shells were matched to his gun, which he owned and was in possession of.
Oswald was caught red-handed minutes later trying to shoot a second cop.
Oswald observed, "Well, they say it only takes a minute to die" after asking about the penalty for cop-killing.
Clemons' words make it clear enough she saw at best a shooter and bystander who was almost certainly Benavides of Cimino, she didn't even see the actual shooting, and other witnesses much closer to Tippit than Clemons said there was but one shooter.
There is no point in attacking a cop on a public street just to frame Oswald as he was already being sought for Kennedy's murder anyway.
There is no logic in attacking a cop since if anything goes wrong here, such as the cop simply outdrawing and capturing his attacker, they will just end up confirming a conspiracy exists.
@@kimmiller6509 "Mysterious deaths list of witness" is an hilarious hoax where everybody on it either had little or not connection to the case or else their causes of death were misreported to sound more "sinister."
What the heck do you mean "Tippit's role" in the assassination? Along those lines there is zero evidence Westbrook and Croy were part of some plot, but that doesn't stop crackpot armchair detectives from happily giving their middle fingers to those men's families as they accuse them so long as it suits their "theories."
Oswald was ID'd by nearly a dozen witnesses, shells were matched to his gun, he was caught minutes later trying to shoot a second cop, and he observed "Well, they say it only takes a minute to die" after asking about the penalty for cop-killing.
"How can so many different eyewitnesses give such different statements?": They all said it was def Oswald or they thought it was - absolutely no eyewitness of the Tippit murder ever said it was Ruby or "Roscoe White"; that's just now in these posts by conspiracy people.
From what I've learned; there was between 70-90 "mysterious deaths"; of witnesses": That's one of the more bizarre conspiracy myths that people buy into. Sigh.
He looks terrified…
You asked a “used car” salesman to tell the truth?!? 😂 Of course he lies His mouth is open! 😂😂
Joking of course.
Man seemed credible, though odd.
I was a used car salesman in another life.
Thanks for the chuckles dude lololololol
"Man seemed credible, though odd": All he said was that he saw the shooter (didn't say it wasn't Oswald, btw, lol), was interviewed about it and then got shot not long after.
The gunman shot him from above? (Concluded by the direction of the bullet) With a rifle from one foot distance? (As testified towards the Warren Commission) He saw the gunman coming up from of his basement and could not give a proper physical description. But he recognized Oswald from 450 ft distance?
"The gunman shot him from above? (Concluded by the direction of the bullet) With a rifle from one foot distance? (As testified towards the Warren Commission) He saw the gunman coming up from of his basement and could not give a proper physical description. But he recognized Oswald from 450 ft distance?": Please explain why you think you made any sense there.
Ryan Reynolds the actor can perfectly play as him in a movie.😅
My lord he acts crazy!
Why's he lick his lips like that? WTF?
The guy was shot through the head, he's lucky he can even move his tongue at all.
Nervous, afraid of an other shot perhaps.
@@marcleblanc3602or a car wreck
@@MichaelMiller-op5sx OR a train wreck! (apollo 1 fire inspector thomas Baron)
"Psycho" Police Commissioner... sticking his tongue out after talking ((th-cam.com/video/hWuB7s2ev1I/w-d-xo.html))Gets Exposed By Constitutional Auditor
Let's see how perfect you are after you've been shot through the head like he was.
This cat is strange
I mean what did the killer want money , a car, or was he just bored and needed someone to shoot?
Wasn't he shot in the temple and then all of a sudden got a memory?
I bet he saw someone Other than oswald
How about “what did the shooter look like exactly? Body? Clothes? SMH
Couldn't initially identify suspect. Gets shot in the head. Was Suddenly certain it was oswald.
He originally said he thought the man was Oswald but would hesitate to positively ID him... which would have suited any conspiracy just fine.
CIA
Tippit's nickname in the DPD... (many more pictures of him are helpful).
Knowing that is a big clue.
what was JD’s nickname?
@@terrykrall I won't reveal it here because people take a look at the few, most common photos of him and disagree. There's a video on a different channel that focuses on this shooting only and that has a more complete description of the events leading up to the shooting, etcetera. Good for you for being curious but this is one that people should earn because just a quick answer to let them get back to their other distractions isn't enough.
Jfk look alike
@@terrykrall He is presumably about to start claiming Tippit was killed to provide body parts for Kennedy's autopsy. LOL
@@aaronz7056 Oh, we're all SO glad that you added the "LOL". EVERY peer reviewed document that I have ever read used only "LOL" as evidence, as you have.
The Raven Gary Marlow shot Tippet
This guy is lying
This is nonsense.
Reynolds initially said he thought the man he saw was Oswald but would hesitate to positively ID him... which would have suited any "conspiracy" just fine. Later he agreed the man must have been Oswald, so his memory hardly "improved" much at all, never mind that he was hardly the lynchpin of the case anyway.
@aaronz7056 Another falsehood on your part, disinfo king.
@@kevinbrennan-ji1so I have said nothing in accurate, ya paranoid. Looking forward to you explaining what the heck the point is in attacking a cop on a public street is in the first place, since Oswald is already being sought anyway and if anything goes wrong here they will just end up confirming a conspiracy exists.
@@kevinbrennan-ji1so No, actually what a said is demonstrably true. No doubt you will now explain:
- what the hell the POINT is of attacking a cop on a public street in the first place since Kennedy dead and Oswald is already being sought anyway
- what the hell the LOGIC is of attacking a cop since if anything goes wrong here, such as Tippit simply outdrawing and capturing his attacker, they will just end up confirming a conspiracy exists
- how the bad guys could have been certain the Dallas PD was guaranteed to be on board for the successful escape from justice of the "real killers" of a brother officer with a wife and 3 children....
@@kevinbrennan-ji1so No doubt you will then:
a) explain persuasively what I said that was inaccurate...
b) explain who the hell DID shoot Tippit
c) explain what the hell the point or logic is in attacking a cop on a public street since Oswald is already being sought for Kennedy anyway and if anything goes wrong here, such as Tippit simply outdrawing and capturing his attacker, they simply blow the whole plot and confirm a conspiracy exists...
Truer words have rarely been spoken, Kevin.
Ha!
Ha what??
@@jimmylieb5225 They twisted & ignored another testimony.
So if Reynolds supposedly didn't make a positive ID of Oswald, why in the world would anyone need to "silence" him? That is just a stupid conspiracy story. If Reynolds had seen someone other than Oswald after the shooting, Mark Lane would have had Reynolds saying he hadn't seen Oswald. Lane merely makes an extremely weak implication of a connection.
If the gunman who killed Officer Tippit wasn't Oswald, why then was Oswald seen going into the movie theater where he was arrested????
And how would he be carrying the gun that was later identified as the gun that killed Officer Tippit???
1) Because Oswald was part of the conspiracy. We don’t know in what way. He was not a shooter. He had long been an intelligence operative, and he knew David Ferrie and Guy Bannister. 2) The gun that killed Tippit was an automatic. Oswald was found carrying a .38 revolver that didn’t even function.