In addition to these covenants made with israel and those joined to israel thus far, we look to the last prophecied covenant of shalom to come in the millenial reign.
I do believe that they recorded from the wrong channel on the audio. If you notice, it appears the people in the congregation can be heard clearly, so it seems the audio person may have caused this to sound tunnel like. 🤷🏼♂️
26:21 this whole section is false teaching! Saying that elements of the Mosaic Covenant was "transformed" with the Covenant of Christ. Jesus FULFILLED the law. Yes some of the Laws given to Moses still apply today, but we do not obey them becuase they were laws given to Moses, we obey them because they are laws under the New Covenant. Either we are under the Law of Moses or we are not. We cannot pick and choose what laws still apply and which ones do not. For example, Lev 19:19 "'Keep my decrees... "'Do not wear clothing woven of two kinds of material.’” Are we required to obey this law today under the New Covenant? If not, then why not if we are to still obey the Law given to Moses. If so, then why are we not to obey all the laws given to Moses. Rom 10:4 Christ is the end of the law so that there may be righteousness for everyone who believes. Gal 3:24 So the law was put in charge to lead us to Christ[8] that we might be justified by faith. Gal 3:25 Now that faith has come, we are no longer under the supervision of the law. Heb 8:13 By calling this covenant "new," he has made the first one obsolete; and what is obsolete and aging will soon disappear.
''Jesus FULFILLED the law'' Did you know that the phrases 'abolish the law' and 'fulfill the law' from Matthew 5:17 were a common rhetorical device employed by the rabbis of the era? To 'abolish the law' meant to misinterpret the Torah. To 'fulfill the law' meant to properly interpret the Torah. You can see many examples of this in the Mishnah: If the Sanhedrin gives a decision to abolish a law, by saying for instance, that the Torah does not include the laws of Sabbath or idolatry, the members of the court are free from a sin offering if they obey them; but if the Sanhedrin abolishes only one part of a law but fulfills the other part, they are liable. (Mishnah, Horayot 1:3)
@@hagiosp Matthew 5:17 would have been an unexpected declaration. Christ was speaking as 'one with authority' (Matthew 7:29). Most rabbis could only teach the established interpretations of the Torah, they were not allowed to teach their own interpretations of the Torah. And because of this, Christ was certain to establish some boundaries. First, He made it clear that He did not come to change the letter of the Law; indeed, that not one jot or tittle of the Law would pass away until heaven and earth pass away (Matthew 5:18). And so forth (Matthew 5:19). That would have eased the minds of his audience. (More importantly, if He had done otherwise, He would have been in violation of false teaching per Deuteronomy 13.) Only then did Christ make another very unexpected declaration: That your righteousness must be greater than the Pharisees. From all outward appearances, the Pharisees were very righteousness men; however, outward appearances can be deceiving. Alas, much of the teaching of the Law had been focused on outward appearances. So here Christ made the proper interpretation of the Law: That it is not just about the letter of the Law, but about the spirit of the Law as well. That it is insufficient to merely keep the commandments, that is is necessary to keep the commandments with the proper motivation, that is, with love in your heart. Point being, Matthew 5:17 is often cited as a proof text that certain commandments are no longer valid. It doesn't support that at all.
Yeshua is the perfect sacrifice for cleansing us of our sin. His payment is the price paid for our restoration into right relationship with our heavenly father. Now we bring a love offering of obedience just as yeshua obeyed his father's instruction always. " i always do as my father instructs", " not my will, but yours be done", " if you love me, keep my mitzvot/ instruction", " i and the father are one", " i came NOT to abolish the instruction/ law, but to fill up/ full full", " these decrees are given for us to observe that we might fear the creator always, for our own good, so that he may keep us alive always"; " for the law/ instruction of yehova is good", etc, etc. Yeshua is not just our salvation, redemption, he is our torah teacher and he reveals to us how to be in covenant with he & the father. He showed us obedience from the heart rather than the letter of the law. Ex " i tell you that a man who even looks @ a woman with lusting her has alreadycommitted adultery with her in his heart", " anyone who nursesanger against his brother in his heart will be subject to judgment". We have not been set free from the law to have license to live as pagans. We have been set free from the consequence of the instruction/ law that requires eternal separation from a holy elohim who cannot even set his eyes upon sin. Yeshua is our kapporah/ covering. His perfect satisfaction of every requirement needed for atonement for our sinful state of being allows the eyes of our loving heavenly father to turn toward us his children as his set apart. this is freedom is mine to accept or refuse. He has also, poured our his holy spirit to help guide us in this laying down of rebellious selfwill. He has done everything! We just have to walk in the truth & reality of this to the best that we can in this fallen world. May you choose love, not license. Shalom yeshua
30:36 Again, this is just false. The purpose of the Law was to lead us to Christ, point us to a Savior. I don't need the Law to know what God's morals are. I look to Jesus for that! I dont need to know the Law to know what God's definition of Sin is. Christ & HIs Spirit tells me that. God said He will write HIs law in our minds and on our hearts. Gal 3:24 So the law was put in charge to lead us to Christ that we might be justified by faith. Gal 3:25 Now that faith has come, we are no longer under the supervision of the law. Gal 6:2 Carry each other's burdens, and in this way you will fulfill the law of Christ.
Lord let us be more obedient to your word Amen!
Thanks for the teaching, always enjoy watching. Working my through the bible with you!
Very interesting as always!
In addition to these covenants made with israel and those joined to israel thus far, we look to the last prophecied covenant of shalom to come in the millenial reign.
I do believe that they recorded from the wrong channel on the audio. If you notice, it appears the people in the congregation can be heard clearly, so it seems the audio person may have caused this to sound tunnel like. 🤷🏼♂️
Excelen teaching. I wish it could be translated into Spanish .
Your audio is sounding like your in a tunnel again.
Maybe the battery in the headset has lost it’s charge again
26:21 this whole section is false teaching! Saying that elements of the Mosaic Covenant was "transformed" with the Covenant of Christ. Jesus FULFILLED the law. Yes some of the Laws given to Moses still apply today, but we do not obey them becuase they were laws given to Moses, we obey them because they are laws under the New Covenant. Either we are under the Law of Moses or we are not. We cannot pick and choose what laws still apply and which ones do not. For example, Lev 19:19 "'Keep my decrees... "'Do not wear clothing woven of two kinds of material.’” Are we required to obey this law today under the New Covenant? If not, then why not if we are to still obey the Law given to Moses. If so, then why are we not to obey all the laws given to Moses.
Rom 10:4 Christ is the end of the law so that there may be righteousness for everyone who believes.
Gal 3:24 So the law was put in charge to lead us to Christ[8] that we might be justified by faith. Gal 3:25 Now that faith has come, we are no longer under the supervision of the law.
Heb 8:13 By calling this covenant "new," he has made the first one obsolete; and what is obsolete and aging will soon disappear.
''Jesus FULFILLED the law''
Did you know that the phrases 'abolish the law' and 'fulfill the law' from Matthew 5:17 were a common rhetorical device employed by the rabbis of the era? To 'abolish the law' meant to misinterpret the Torah. To 'fulfill the law' meant to properly interpret the Torah.
You can see many examples of this in the Mishnah:
If the Sanhedrin gives a decision to abolish a law, by saying for instance, that the Torah does not include the laws of Sabbath or idolatry, the members of the court are free from a sin offering if they obey them; but if the Sanhedrin abolishes only one part of a law but fulfills the other part, they are liable. (Mishnah, Horayot 1:3)
@@clickwhistle Ok, so what are you saying? Not sure I understand your point. Thanks
@@hagiosp Matthew 5:17 would have been an unexpected declaration. Christ was speaking as 'one with authority' (Matthew 7:29). Most rabbis could only teach the established interpretations of the Torah, they were not allowed to teach their own interpretations of the Torah. And because of this, Christ was certain to establish some boundaries. First, He made it clear that He did not come to change the letter of the Law; indeed, that not one jot or tittle of the Law would pass away until heaven and earth pass away (Matthew 5:18). And so forth (Matthew 5:19). That would have eased the minds of his audience. (More importantly, if He had done otherwise, He would have been in violation of false teaching per Deuteronomy 13.)
Only then did Christ make another very unexpected declaration: That your righteousness must be greater than the Pharisees. From all outward appearances, the Pharisees were very righteousness men; however, outward appearances can be deceiving. Alas, much of the teaching of the Law had been focused on outward appearances. So here Christ made the proper interpretation of the Law: That it is not just about the letter of the Law, but about the spirit of the Law as well. That it is insufficient to merely keep the commandments, that is is necessary to keep the commandments with the proper motivation, that is, with love in your heart.
Point being, Matthew 5:17 is often cited as a proof text that certain commandments are no longer valid. It doesn't support that at all.
Yeshua is the perfect sacrifice for cleansing us of our sin. His payment is the price paid for our restoration into right relationship with our heavenly father. Now we bring a love offering of obedience just as yeshua obeyed his father's instruction always. " i always do as my father instructs", " not my will, but yours be done", " if you love me, keep my mitzvot/ instruction", " i and the father are one", " i came NOT to abolish the instruction/ law, but to fill up/ full full", " these decrees are given for us to observe that we might fear the creator always, for our own good, so that he may keep us alive always"; " for the law/ instruction of yehova is good", etc, etc.
Yeshua is not just our salvation, redemption, he is our torah teacher and he reveals to us how to be in covenant with he & the father. He showed us obedience from the heart rather than the letter of the law. Ex " i tell you that a man who even looks @ a woman with lusting her has alreadycommitted adultery with her in his heart", " anyone who nursesanger against his brother in his heart will be subject to judgment". We have not been set free from the law to have license to live as pagans. We have been set free from the consequence of the instruction/ law that requires eternal separation from a holy elohim who cannot even set his eyes upon sin. Yeshua is our kapporah/ covering. His perfect satisfaction of every requirement needed for atonement for our sinful state of being allows the eyes of our loving heavenly father to turn toward us his children as his set apart. this is freedom is mine to accept or refuse.
He has also, poured our his holy spirit to help guide us in this laying down of rebellious selfwill. He has done everything! We just have to walk in the truth & reality of this to the best that we can in this fallen world. May you choose love, not license. Shalom
yeshua
Heb 8: 13 is a scribal note added and an incorrect understanding
30:36 Again, this is just false. The purpose of the Law was to lead us to Christ, point us to a Savior. I don't need the Law to know what God's morals are. I look to Jesus for that! I dont need to know the Law to know what God's definition of Sin is. Christ & HIs Spirit tells me that. God said He will write HIs law in our minds and on our hearts.
Gal 3:24 So the law was put in charge to lead us to Christ that we might be justified by faith. Gal 3:25 Now that faith has come, we are no longer under the supervision of the law.
Gal 6:2 Carry each other's burdens, and in this way you will fulfill the law of Christ.
Good history ,,,, but extremely repetitive ,,, so just wind ahead.