I was at this game with my old man as a 14 yr old kid all I remember is Gazzas figure flying up in the air followed by pandamodium and a huge WOOO from the crowd as it was shown on the replay,that's what I'm talking about!Thanks dad for the memories!✌️🍻
I was there too, it was a tight finish with Collingwwod coming back from a long way down but that moment made you forget about the game situation, unbelievable leap Poor Gary never got up in the air again after that, it nearly killed him
@J G You're getting carried away with the numbers ! Hahaha 😂😸🤣 Asia is home is 60 % of the world population. Soccer is only a minor sport there. Same with the US: soccer is a very minor sport. Haha 🤣🤣🤣
@@ablett9 I see what you are saying. In real time it looks dodgy but he did seem to have it as he hit the ground. Using only 1 arm didn’t help his cause.
Pause the replay at 1:54 just as the bottom of his number 5 touches the ground. You can clearly see (unless you're blind or a Hawthorn/Collingwood supporter) that he has the ball controlled between his chest and elbow. People can debate that he possibly didn't control it for long enough, but you CANNOT watch this replay and say he had no control / it was just luck. This guy was probably the best high marker ever to play the game. He knew exactly what he was doing and deliberately used his left arm to push it to the corner of his right arm where it stays until his elbow hits the ground. Also the umpire was only about the 30 metres out from goal with no players obstructing his view AND in the perfect position to see the ball in Ablett's right arm.
I LOVE Ablett, but we were there. He rose, the crowd rose! He dropped it. We sat down again, laughed, marvelled. Then we noticed him going back for a shot on goal. Everybody was puzzled. Where was the free? Then, someone said; "I think they paid the mark?"
Losing control of the ball when you hit the ground is still loss of control which equals no mark. Take the sentimentality out of it, it's not a mark for mine even though it was paid. I loved Gary Ablett as a player, but I will never consider that to be the mark of the century.
Robbo you only need to have control of the ball for it to be a mark even if it spills after someone punches it after its grabbed or if you hit the ground and it spills out
Cos teams have learnt that to win you need a good defence. The defensive structure in this game was absolute appalling. No wonder they could reach 3 figures
@@ronanrogers4127 should be tried for crimes against football but it started with Wallace against the bombers just no talent charff stretching the rules to beat good teams and send spectators to sleep
Omg. I bow to you. Please yell me why it wasn't a mark your highness great and big full forward/centre half forward. I am unworthy. Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
@@shramo He touched the ball, and it fell straight to the ground but he didn't hold it at all. Ablett was a great player, but on that occasion no way was that a mark.
I find it rather hilarious that people still think he controlled it. He tapped it into his body bounced off stomach into his right arm then the ball flings out clear as day. Not sure what y'all are smoking. BUT...... im glad they did pay it because it makes for great history.
How can it be the mark of the century when it wasn't even a clear mark. There have been lots better actual marks. People associate it as a great mark because it was taken by a great player. If it was anybody else we would not even bother. Play on.
Even if it was a mark (which it clearly wasn't), how could you look at that and say it was anything special? He basically fell over while reaching out and touching the ball. once. with one hand. It's not even the ruck hit out of the week.
oh yeah it bounced off his right wrist and landed on his stomach near his left hand so which one of his hands held it on the way down mate. held to his stomach by gravity as the ball fell and he fell.
This will always be hotly debated. I guess as the umpire paid it as a mark it has to be in the conversation, but surely when comparing the greatness of various marks one of the things that should be considered is the amount of control of the ball the player had. In this case the control was minimal which moves the "mark" well down the list of great ones. It's a moot point though. Officially the mark of the century has been awarded to Sean Smith for his towering mark on the goal line when playing for Melbourne.
Some leap.. I m Irish and went to all 3 tests back in 87 when the compromise football between Ireland and Australia were played in Croke Park.. Lots of punch ups but some amazing football.. I remember being fascinated by how high the rules players could leap and how they could hang in the air waiting for the ball.. Great stuff.. Jim Stynes played then.. One tough cookie
Unrelated: It shits me that they don't show the player name/number/stats on screen anymore. As a kid i knew most player names thanks to this. Now I only know the big guns...
Mother's Day 1994 was when my family went to the football, all 5 of us for the first time together at a football match. Watching Geelong Vs Collingwood and this highlight of the match was one I never forgot over so many years.
Was definitely NOT a mark, he never caught it, or even CONTROLLED it at ANY point - even the commentators disagreed with it. Essendon’s Gary Morcroft mark against the Bulldogs was the greatest mark ever - this was a ‘sense of occasion’ joke !
He never once had control of it... aside from a possible split second but that isn't enough to constitute a mark. Definitely a hell of a leap and incredibly athletic play, just shouldn't have been a mark.
@@chadchadderton Pause the video at 1:54. Step forward using the . key on your keyboard. Watch the ball clearly being controlled between his right elbow and chest until he hits the ground. Understand why this was named mark of the century.
@@Ash_18037 I too agree this is a mark, no bias here, not a Geelong or Collingwood supporter or hater. It was GeelongFC mark of the century not AFL/VFL mark of the century just to be clear. The AFL/VFL mark of the century was by Shaun Smith in 1995. Personally though, any mark that comes loose before or after they hit the deck shouldn't be in any best/top50 etc video and definitely shouldn't be mark of the year, I'm looking at Nic Nat 2015 (dropped before he landed) and Jeremy Howe 2012 (come loose after landing). We need to set higher standards. This mark by Ablett wouldn't even make my top 100, maybe even 200, only because the ball coming loose after landing. There's plenty better marks by him imo.
Stop being a salty collingwood fan and move on. He controlled it in his right hand before the impact of the ground knocked it out, so just accept it and stop complaining
If you run it in slow motion (repeatedly pausing it), you'll see that it was a mark. He momentarily held it in his right arm between his right elbow and body. That's why he claimed it too, because he knew he had control except for the fact that he hit the ground hard and it bounced out.
I have seen it many times and I seen it the first time. No matter how many times you show it, it’s not a fucking mark, they paid it because it’s this bloke.
@@edwardbakadingo4261 I trust u have already seen my comments? Anyway he did control it in his arms or stomach or whatever you think until he hits the ground so it is a mark.
@@alexandertahn9896 yeah in your dreams so whe was it in his left hand in the numerous replays. You say 'controlled it in his arms or stomach' so make up your mind did he control it in his arms. no because its no where near his right arm after it bounced off his wrist. OR did he control it in his stomach I have watched it many times and I am quite certain that he did not eat the ball so it was not controllled in his stomach.
I was in the pocket that day Remember it well If you were at the ground it was a mark Cant sit at home in ya arm chair and say he didn’t control it I was there......Ump blew his whistle and said Mark As a North supporter i would go just to watch the great man What a player 👏👏👏
At the end of the day it got paid a mark so what difference does it make? But I absoloutely can sit at home in my armchair and say he didn't control it, because he simply didn't.
anyone not from geelong knows it wasnt a mark. i mean the mark and goal of the year is decided by a phone vote and one year the winner voted for himself several thousand times so even the process to decide the mark of the year is a bad joke like everything else run by the AFL
The shock of hitting the ground and he lost control of the ball, but he had controlled it to that point, even for a brief fraction of a second...it would have been understandable if the ump hadn't paid it, but technically it's a mark.
@@sandyian7058 well the old rules when I had rulebook when I was kid said that but the knew afl rules just say he has to control it its stupid as fuck because that wasn't a mark
I'm a lifetime Cats Fan & even I have to say he was lucky to be paid a mark. Hmm hang on I just had another couple of slo- mo replays and it does appear he holds it to his right side on the way down and the impact with the ground knocks the ball loose. Did he have it under control long enough, going by similar marks I've seen paid, yes. I reverse my view, it was a mark.
I was at this game with my old man as a 14 yr old kid all I remember is Gazzas figure flying up in the air followed by pandamodium and a huge WOOO from the crowd as it was shown on the replay,that's what I'm talking about!Thanks dad for the memories!✌️🍻
I was there too :)
Awesome! Thanks for the story.
I was there too, it was a tight finish with Collingwwod coming back from a long way down but that moment made you forget about the game situation, unbelievable leap
Poor Gary never got up in the air again after that, it nearly killed him
Even if it wasn’t really a mark, the umpires still called it as one, and the effort was still sensational
@MU FC Aight, pretty sure it called Football tho
Whether it's a mark or not, everyone would agree that play was spectacular !!!
@J G
You're getting carried away with the numbers !
Hahaha 😂😸🤣
Asia is home is 60 % of the world population. Soccer is only a minor sport there.
Same with the US: soccer is a very minor sport.
Haha 🤣🤣🤣
This video should be called ‘most of the quarter with a dropped mark being paid somewhere in it.’
It bounced out when he hit the ground , it was a mark
@@ablett9 I see what you are saying. In real time it looks dodgy but he did seem to have it as he hit the ground. Using only 1 arm didn’t help his cause.
Amen
I was there
Greatest mark you will ever see
Never controlled it, wasnt a mark
Greatest mark of all time!!! Greatest player of all time!!!
Disco Roach 79 was better
Pause the replay at 1:54 just as the bottom of his number 5 touches the ground. You can clearly see (unless you're blind or a Hawthorn/Collingwood supporter) that he has the ball controlled between his chest and elbow. People can debate that he possibly didn't control it for long enough, but you CANNOT watch this replay and say he had no control / it was just luck. This guy was probably the best high marker ever to play the game. He knew exactly what he was doing and deliberately used his left arm to push it to the corner of his right arm where it stays until his elbow hits the ground. Also the umpire was only about the 30 metres out from goal with no players obstructing his view AND in the perfect position to see the ball in Ablett's right arm.
The mark you take, without taking a mark
without the ball touching your hand
@@edwardbakadingo4261 it doesn’t have to
Salty Hawthorn supporter spotted (or maybe Collingwood... no I'm tipping Hawthorn) ;)
@@Ash_18037 Freo actually
Definitely a mark...!
He tucked it in & controlled it.... & it only spilled out when he hit the turf.
haha
@@edwardbakadingo4261 .... what does that mean?
I LOVE Ablett, but we were there. He rose, the crowd rose! He dropped it. We sat down again, laughed, marvelled. Then we noticed him going back for a shot on goal. Everybody was puzzled. Where was the free? Then, someone said; "I think they paid the mark?"
If that was a mark than I’m better than Dustin Martin in a finals series
Lol
Well then you must be
AUSSIES WHEN THEY TALK BACK IN THE DAY FUNNY AS !! 🤣🤣
LIKE... LOL OMG IKR FUNNY AF BACK IN DA DAY BRUH AMIRITE!!
Mark of the Century, not even a mark.
I've never thought that was a mark .
Then you’ve never been right about it
Losing control of the ball when you hit the ground is still loss of control which equals no mark. Take the sentimentality out of it, it's not a mark for mine even though it was paid. I loved Gary Ablett as a player, but I will never consider that to be the mark of the century.
I agree. No way that's a mark.
In football if you have control of the ball and mark it and land and pops out it's a mark in cricket it's considered a drop catch.
No actually, people drop it all the time after they take a specky, so I consider it a mark
Don't be a downer man
The GOAT mark from the GOAT
The man looked so much younger when he retired.
Robbo you only need to have control of the ball for it to be a mark even if it spills after someone punches it after its grabbed or if you hit the ground and it spills out
Never a mark.
It was a mark. he had control of the ball all the way. It only spilled out when he hit the ground.
WOW!
Remember the days when AFL scores even threatened to make 3 figures.
The rubbish we are served today is nothing like this.
Cos teams have learnt that to win you need a good defence. The defensive structure in this game was absolute appalling. No wonder they could reach 3 figures
Yeah, it’s really crap now. I haven’t watched a complete game in almost 20 years. The defensive swarm pioneered by the Swans killed it.
@@ronanrogers4127 should be tried for crimes against football but it started with Wallace against the bombers just no talent charff stretching the rules to beat good teams and send spectators to sleep
Shorter quarters in 2020 for a condensed season.
No mark, play on.
Having played full forward and centre half forward at a relatively high level, that was not a mark in any way shape or form.
Hahahahahahahahahahabababababababababababahahahahahahahaha
Omg. I bow to you. Please yell me why it wasn't a mark your highness great and big full forward/centre half forward.
I am unworthy.
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
@@shramo He touched the ball, and it fell straight to the ground but he didn't hold it at all. Ablett was a great player, but on that occasion no way was that a mark.
I find it rather hilarious that people still think he controlled it. He tapped it into his body bounced off stomach into his right arm then the ball flings out clear as day. Not sure what y'all are smoking. BUT...... im glad they did pay it because it makes for great history.
Alot of people say he dropped it, but he caught it, and it bounced out when he hit the ground, that's a mark!!
"(sniiiif), rip snorter." 😆 Still remember his interview where he's high on coke.
did he break a rib, an ankle, a little finger? I know that they were all big and tough men back then but, the palaver after he hit the ground?
Biggest not-a-mark of the century
How can it be the mark of the century when it wasn't even a clear mark. There have been lots better actual marks. People associate it as a great mark because it was taken by a great player. If it was anybody else we would not even bother. Play on.
How was that s mark exactly, the ball spilled out?
Ablett almost died for our entertainment
5 yrs since this vid uploaded
now 8.. how are you bro..
Ball bounced right off his chest no mark
Even if it was a mark (which it clearly wasn't), how could you look at that and say it was anything special? He basically fell over while reaching out and touching the ball. once. with one hand. It's not even the ruck hit out of the week.
which hand was that it hit his wrist and his stomach and the ground
@@edwardbakadingo4261 it didn’t
One of the most spectacular pushes in the back in history👍
01:23 Shivers. Down. The. Spine.
Held the ball to his chest all the way down.
oh yeah it bounced off his right wrist and landed on his stomach near his left hand so which one of his hands held it on the way down mate. held to his stomach by gravity as the ball fell and he fell.
@@edwardbakadingo4261 so that makes it not a mark? As long as it was touching between his arms and stomach I don’t see a problem
@@alexandertahn9896 so if I kick a ball into you and it hits you in the stomach near your arm and it bounces off, it mean you marked it?!
@@sliat1981 If you kicked the ball and it hit my arm then bounced onto my chest before I hit the ground, then yes.
@@sliat1981 He didn’t drop it before he hit the ground so it is a mark.
If there was a bed of pillows under him the ball wouldn’t have spilled out ???
AFL is the best sport by far
It’s not because AFL is not a sport. AFL is a governing body. Aussie rules is the sport
To everyone saying it’s a mark
He didn’t even hold it longer than half a second
No mark
You try taking a mark like that and hitting the ground with an injured leg. Dickhead
@@darylpurdy7717 pfft. Did he catch the ball. Not even close. No mark. Certainly no mark of the century. Like best in 100 years? Haha
@@darylpurdy7717 ok bro next time I tap the ball and I hit my head it better be payed as a mark
Dickhead
I am not sure that he even touched it with either hand
@@qyzah8362 ABsolutely you should have Don Scotts job your description was brilliant
That was not a mark and definitely not a mark of the century but because it's Gary Ablett they gave it to him
Clearly a mark. Only need to control it for an instance which he more than did.
Are you a Geelong supporter by anychance?
He had it till the impact of the ground and he hit the ground pretty hard
oh yeah it bounced off his right wrist and landed on his stomach near his left hand so which one of his hands held it on the way down mate.
Has no comparison to the lift and actual mark that Sean Smith took.
Who is Sean Smith??
This will always be hotly debated. I guess as the umpire paid it as a mark it has to be in the conversation, but surely when comparing the greatness of various marks one of the things that should be considered is the amount of control of the ball the player had. In this case the control was minimal which moves the "mark" well down the list of great ones.
It's a moot point though. Officially the mark of the century has been awarded to Sean Smith for his towering mark on the goal line when playing for Melbourne.
Boo cats but amazing mark
alex bonner more like amazing effort
Respect given where respect due
I was there never for that mark
No one at the ground thought it wasn’t a mark.
Only the commentators doubted it
well you are kidding you must have been in the center of the geelong cheer squad if you believe that.
Sorry wasn't a mark, not even the first time.
Spectacular leap but not a mark !
Missed the kick
same as the mark but yeah
I’ve seen better unpaid marks
would of been a great mark if it was a mark
No way was that mark of the century.
Yeah it’s a mark...if you hold it on pause for a minute!🤪🤣👎🏼
yeah but do you pause it when it bouces off his wrist (maybe a bit before that) or when it bounces off his stomach to the ground
Questionable mark and not mark of the century this or any other. But GA is still the best player of ALLTIME.
Wayne carey is better
Too bad it wasn’t a Mark . Jezza 1970 me thinks.
That's not a mark!!!
Not a mark at all. But still amazing to see.
He marked it but it fell out of his hands
Fidget Spinner Guy41 then it’s not a mark
Sharon Edelsten he tapped it.
@@sliat1981 clearly controlled.
@Sliat1981 even if it comes out of his hands it’s a mark because he had control of the ball. It fell out because of impact. That means it’s a mark.
Not a mark
Shauns smiths was better
it's not a mark! wouldn't have come close to being paid these days.
not a mark, he drop it and wasn't long enough
agree
shut up
This is right he did not hold it for long enough he dropped it when Geelong dropped the game
tobby grant not true mate he lost the ball from the impact
Nah, never had control. If he didn’t have control and lost it on impact, then it’s not a mark. Play on
Some leap.. I m Irish and went to all 3 tests back in 87 when the compromise football between Ireland and Australia were played in Croke Park.. Lots of punch ups but some amazing football.. I remember being fascinated by how high the rules players could leap and how they could hang in the air waiting for the ball.. Great stuff.. Jim Stynes played then.. One tough cookie
Unrelated: It shits me that they don't show the player name/number/stats on screen anymore. As a kid i knew most player names thanks to this. Now I only know the big guns...
Play AFL fantasy
not even a mark
Not a mark, maybe in under 10s, that's ridiculous.
“Attempted “mark of the century
Leap of the century.
He paid it.
Only because his name was ablett, anyone else its play on
Editing of the century when you watched it later it almost looked like he might have marked it, sort of, maybe, nah not really
Actually it is a mark, no one else had touched it and it was in his arms when he fell to the ground so I am pretty sure it’s a mark
Not a mark.
The umpires called it.
@@shramo the umpires fucked up that goal in the 2009 grand final
Not even close
Mother's Day 1994 was when my family went to the football, all 5 of us for the first time together at a football match.
Watching Geelong Vs Collingwood and this highlight of the match was one I never forgot over so many years.
Play on every day of the week 😂😂😂😂😂.The non biased commentator knew it, not a mark so can't be mark of the century gtfo.
I agree but you’re seriously calling Maguire non-biased!?
AROUND THIS TIME IS WHEN THEY SHOULD HAVE LEFT THE GAME ALONE.. NOW ITS FUKT AND WAY TOO COMMERCIALISED .. sry caps
1:21
your welcome
Farce of the century.
Not even close to a mark . , doubt he even new where the ball was after it left his hand
Was definitely NOT a mark, he never caught it, or even CONTROLLED it at ANY point - even the commentators disagreed with it. Essendon’s Gary Morcroft mark against the Bulldogs was the greatest mark ever - this was a ‘sense of occasion’ joke !
The leap mate, the leap!
Last time I seen a touch like that paid was at my younger cousins Auskick game ITS NOT A MARK
No mark
No mark
The leap was great
But did not keep control of the ball
Should be leap of the century
It’s certainly a mark he controlled the ball all the way down and the force of the ground on his back knocked it out
Thankyou for this, it is so obvious
He never once had control of it... aside from a possible split second but that isn't enough to constitute a mark.
Definitely a hell of a leap and incredibly athletic play, just shouldn't have been a mark.
@@chadchadderton Pause the video at 1:54. Step forward using the . key on your keyboard. Watch the ball clearly being controlled between his right elbow and chest until he hits the ground. Understand why this was named mark of the century.
@@Ash_18037 Nope, didn't control it to be classed a mark. Well not in accordance to the law.
Still an amazing effort however.
@@Ash_18037
I too agree this is a mark, no bias here, not a Geelong or Collingwood supporter or hater.
It was GeelongFC mark of the century not AFL/VFL mark of the century just to be clear.
The AFL/VFL mark of the century was by Shaun Smith in 1995.
Personally though, any mark that comes loose before or after they hit the deck shouldn't be in any best/top50 etc video and definitely shouldn't be mark of the year, I'm looking at Nic Nat 2015 (dropped before he landed) and Jeremy Howe 2012 (come loose after landing). We need to set higher standards.
This mark by Ablett wouldn't even make my top 100, maybe even 200, only because the ball coming loose after landing. There's plenty better marks by him imo.
Nowhere near a mark. Booooo!!!!
Stop being a salty collingwood fan and move on. He controlled it in his right hand before the impact of the ground knocked it out, so just accept it and stop complaining
If you run it in slow motion (repeatedly pausing it), you'll see that it was a mark. He momentarily held it in his right arm between his right elbow and body. That's why he claimed it too, because he knew he had control except for the fact that he hit the ground hard and it bounced out.
Gavin McRae Of course he claim it was a mark regardless if it was.
Gavin McRae don’t tell me...you’re a Geelong supporter. Never had control of it. Certainly was the leap of the century
Momentarily holding it isn't a mark
Yes slow me down in real life and see if it’s a mark
Mate, I'm an umpire. Not a mark. A great attempt, but he did not control it.
That was not a mark.
If that happened in todays footy he would have been subbed off and given a week for concussion. Those were the days!
Not a mark.
That wasn’t a mark 🤦🏽♂️🤣
Yes it was watch at 0.5x speed
@@alexandertahn9896 no it wasn’t. Bouncing off your wrist is not marking
@@sliat1981 It bounced of his arm into his chest. The angle is still weird, so it is hard to tell.
@@alexandertahn9896 no it flicked off his wrist. Not a mark
no
I have seen it many times and I seen it the first time.
No matter how many times you show it, it’s not a fucking mark, they paid it because it’s this bloke.
Taking nothing away from Ablett, it was NO mark.
It was a mark, he was in the air that long it doesn’t matter that it bounced out after he hit the ground
Not a mark. Still awesome though
0:04 Rowe took mark of the millennium but wasn't paid. Controlled it as long as Ablett's.
Following that line... Who took the mark of the million years?
Haha 😂🤣
@@capitainebonhomme1609 Tim Darcy 0.59 :p
and thousands of others not paid, as Robbo said what a great leap, and then the ball bounces off his stomach
@@edwardbakadingo4261 I trust u have already seen my comments? Anyway he did control it in his arms or stomach or whatever you think until he hits the ground so it is a mark.
@@alexandertahn9896 yeah in your dreams so whe was it in his left hand in the numerous replays. You say 'controlled it in his arms or stomach' so make up your mind did he control it in his arms. no because its no where near his right arm after it bounced off his wrist. OR did he control it in his stomach I have watched it many times and I am quite certain that he did not eat the ball so it was not controllled in his stomach.
I was in the pocket that day
Remember it well
If you were at the ground it was a mark
Cant sit at home in ya arm chair and say he didn’t control it
I was there......Ump blew his whistle and said Mark
As a North supporter i would go just to watch the great man
What a player 👏👏👏
😂😂😂😂we can see it in hd now buddy so believe what you want.
I was there and i could see he the ball hit his wrist and stomach and the ground. so did his somach mark the ball or his wrist.
Thanks mate for the confirmation
At the end of the day it got paid a mark so what difference does it make?
But I absoloutely can sit at home in my armchair and say he didn't control it, because he simply didn't.
Definitely a mark. Ball bobbles out only when Ablett hits the ground.
bobbles out? he fell on the ground and the ball bounced off his stomach hilarious
No mark - play on!Obviously never seen real marks by Ian McKay or Don Lindner. (Oh, that's right, they're not Vics and therefore don't rate)
anyone not from geelong knows it wasnt a mark. i mean the mark and goal of the year is decided by a phone vote and one year the winner voted for himself several thousand times so even the process to decide the mark of the year is a bad joke like everything else run by the AFL
Rubbish should never have been paid
That is not a mark lmao. What a joke
The shock of hitting the ground and he lost control of the ball, but he had controlled it to that point, even for a brief fraction of a second...it would have been understandable if the ump hadn't paid it, but technically it's a mark.
Isn't the rile at least 3 seconds of controlling the ball or something
😂🤣
@@sandyian7058 well the old rules when I had rulebook when I was kid said that but the knew afl rules just say he has to control it its stupid as fuck because that wasn't a mark
Technically it’s not a mark
@@royboy4571 agree
I'm a lifetime Cats Fan & even I have to say he was lucky to be paid a mark. Hmm hang on I just had another couple of slo- mo replays and it does appear he holds it to his right side on the way down and the impact with the ground knocks the ball loose. Did he have it under control long enough, going by similar marks I've seen paid, yes. I reverse my view, it was a mark.
When footy WAS footy but no way near a grab..nice fly & hang but no cigar..not even in slow mo and didnt bod it.
When people drop it after they land on the ground it is still paid as a mark, and in slow mo you can see it, the ball is between his stomach and arms.
Yeah, I’ll pay that but mark of the century? There’s been a hundred better and Ablett himself has taken better.
Rubish!