Mod-03 Lec-06 The Samkhya Philosophy - II

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 8

  • @aprameya6623
    @aprameya6623 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great lecture, better than any Marvel superhero movie. Thank you Prof. Satya Sir

  • @manojkpradhan1450
    @manojkpradhan1450 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank-you sir and IIT Madras aswell

  • @vasukinagabhushan
    @vasukinagabhushan 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hindus should not forget these great schools of philosophy.

  • @AjeetKumar-cx4vn
    @AjeetKumar-cx4vn 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nicely explained sir.

  • @AwakeningTreeYoga
    @AwakeningTreeYoga 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    30:10 Hasty generalisation fallacy. Just because some things have one cause does not mean all things have one cause. "River" can be caused by dew, rain, ice, or snow. It is neither caused by one thing or all things. There are many hasty generalisations in this presentation.

    • @ramanathanramakrishnan8939
      @ramanathanramakrishnan8939 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +AwakeningTreeYoga
      Sir the idea is the underlying cause of all these "Multiple causes" is water.

    • @AwakeningTreeYoga
      @AwakeningTreeYoga 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Water is a noun, not an event. We are talking about events. I stand by what I said... just because one thing has one cause does not mean that all things have one cause. It's called a hasty generalisation.
      Furthermore, ice is not necessarily made from water at all. That is simply poor physics. The solid state of many substances would be called ice. It is not caused or even related to water in such a scenario.
      There are quite some flaws in your logic overall. You have used over-simplified reasoning to support an ancient philosophy that doesn't stand up to modern educated scrutiny.

    • @priyabratajena7602
      @priyabratajena7602 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Solid state of other elements will not cause River of water. Ice made up of water only can. Dont judge old philosophies by the glasses of modern physics.