Yes, this is a great show. Not only for the individual pieces, but the excellent work that a gallery can do by interpreting a period of time and a body of work. I wish that there were more galleries and curators like this one. Thanks James and Kate. Chris
at 13:20 my art vlog worlds collide with the guy from Gorky's Granddaughter! Great report, I remember seeing these or many like them in art magazines in school in the early 90s, they were very influential, but imagine if back then I had access to the Kalm report! with those excellent detail shots, oh that would've been on another level! And yes that E. Murray is dynamite!
Very enjoyable, thanks James. Particularly liked the David Reed theory on a street history of art. In London during the 70's there were some really magical but now obscure artists many of whom are well remembered by those that were around then but otherwise now invisible. It's almost like a private history which runs parallel with the familiar overview of the visible. I guess it's sort of the same of NY at the time.
Its a great work of the gallery to make this focussed view - and very interesting to hear a bit the story about it even if it was terribly noisy because of the opening event - but thank you anyhow it IS very interesting and it is worth seeing more than once in spite of the noice and the lack of a total view on each painting before moving Round for details of color and brushstrokes etc
Thank you for sharing. Feedback: Hold your camera still for at least 10 seconds in front of each piece. Then go in for close ups, but hold each close for at least 3 seconds. When you move the camera quickly it is garbage. The image waves. Great verbal insider stuff. Do you ever NOT like what you are seeing or do you only show what you like. You seem very diplomatic. Continue. Hold that camera still for all to see what you are pointing at.
fucking awesome, maybe someday you will get a 1080p resolution camera for my giant monitor & bandwidth haha! nonetheless 720 is gorgeous thank you mr. kalm.
I know it's always an opening with you, and noisybusy... And thanks for your films. But I find it really frustrating when there's no locked off shot, even for a second, to show an entire composition, before swimming in details.. Unless I've seen a whole piece, I have no idea what the details are for! I can imagine ways you could do that in the edit, without losing the sense of immediacy or the throng, if those are what you want to keep. (For example, you could try fading in/out of a freeze frame, while keeping the sound running.) You got to see the whole piece, still for a moment, at the show! I'm on the other side of the world, and didn't! I feel left out!
It is very interesting but please show each piece in total before you move around on the painting and through the exhibition - that would give us a much greater view of what the painting is - and celebrate that to look at art is also to be present with something
so when are we going to see a James Kalm exhibition videoed by all the artists he has shown.........this is a cool show......this stuff has integrity, something I think is lacking for the most part.....
True is I like your videos don't care for you cometary and critics if you don't talk will be lots better no one should crtic art or artist that privilege is a personal experience for a each individuals to enjoy and patetick dilusional galleries owners that are no different then a car dealership salesmen
So basically, he's copying illustrations/diagrams from science books and calling it 'abstract art'. It isn't. BTW Next time go when it's NOT a noisy opening. Just saying.
+tamsinthai what a little snob you are. condescending remarks and pointless recommendations.... youtube is saturated with you people... even though it's a characteristic of having depression, and that's fine, i'll never understand why people call out that they are depressed in this way.
tamsinthai attack? try to not to be so emotionally sensitive, this is youtube and your entertainment. i'm only responding to my entertainment. yours is the video. it wouldn't be the same without you depressed people on here. fool? maybe, but i'm no snob.
tamsinthai this must be a word you learned recently in school and thinks it applies to everyone who emotionally offends you now. i could apply this to anyone, easily. you did it to me for sure. what's the point of addressing it? your just deflecting. interesting...
6 years on, this one has some serious staying power. Love hearing your easy narration of this bygone era - kind of wistful, kind of enchanting.
Yes, this is a great show. Not only for the individual pieces, but the excellent work that a gallery can do by interpreting a period of time and a body of work. I wish that there were more galleries and curators like this one. Thanks James and Kate. Chris
The best, yet. 80s so forgotten. Brilliant.
Love it James! You're the best! Thanks Kate
Wow very nice to see! More!
so relevant now- a great looking show! and terrific documentation of it! Thanks James Kalm!
You have helped me to expand my exposure to art both known and unknown. Thank you very much
NOT pretentious, over-the-top, nor preachy. Worth it.
Terrific show, wonderful artwork, nice commentary by the curator, excellent :) :)
thanks for posting this and the other recent abstraction shows-inspirational!
Art is not over!
thanks grew up poring through old Flash art mags Great to see that Eighties painting is so influential
at 13:20 my art vlog worlds collide with the guy from Gorky's Granddaughter! Great report, I remember seeing these or many like them in art magazines in school in the early 90s, they were very influential, but imagine if back then I had access to the Kalm report! with those excellent detail shots, oh that would've been on another level! And yes that E. Murray is dynamite!
Great exhibition thanks James
Thank you!
That early Stanley is magnificent. Hellman, Winters, Laskwr!
You seam to be the only person left, who is actually looking at paintings.
Thank you Kate
Great, cogent interview, thankyou
You mentioned this in another Rubenstein curated event. Came over right away.
This program has become one on my most watched and referenced programs...Thanks-JK
Wonderful,thanks
Very enjoyable, thanks James. Particularly liked the David Reed theory on a street history of art. In London during the 70's there were some really magical but now obscure artists many of whom are well remembered by those that were around then but otherwise now invisible. It's almost like a private history which runs parallel with the familiar overview of the visible.
I guess it's sort of the same of NY at the time.
Thank you very much for showing me some very interesting artists, like Jack Whitten : D
Its a great work of the gallery to make this focussed view - and very interesting to hear a bit the story about it even if it was terribly noisy because of the opening event - but thank you anyhow it IS very interesting and it is worth seeing more than once in spite of the noice and the lack of a total view on each painting before moving Round for details of color and brushstrokes etc
Wow! That has left my heart in a good place today...thanks James, Kate....Lorin in Boise
Really enjoyed the Elizabeth Murray piece.
Just brilliant.
Wow - a great learning experience! Thanks
Nice video James, the sax player in the beginning hooked me in..
Thank you Kate, thank you everybody.
really enjoyed this one. nice.
Great show!
Thanks so much...I don't know why but the sound was a bit mixed up? Had to turn off the sound, but enjoyed seeing....
love it !
Thank you for sharing. Feedback: Hold your camera still for at least 10 seconds in front of each piece. Then go in for close ups, but hold each close for at least 3 seconds. When you move the camera quickly it is garbage. The image waves. Great verbal insider stuff. Do you ever NOT like what you are seeing or do you only show what you like. You seem very diplomatic. Continue. Hold that camera still for all to see what you are pointing at.
I remember, thank you.
fucking awesome, maybe someday you will get a 1080p resolution camera for my giant monitor & bandwidth haha! nonetheless 720 is gorgeous thank you mr. kalm.
Excellent
Nice show!
I know it's always an opening with you, and noisybusy... And thanks for your films. But I find it really frustrating when there's no locked off shot, even for a second, to show an entire composition, before swimming in details.. Unless I've seen a whole piece, I have no idea what the details are for! I can imagine ways you could do that in the edit, without losing the sense of immediacy or the throng, if those are what you want to keep. (For example, you could try fading in/out of a freeze frame, while keeping the sound running.)
You got to see the whole piece, still for a moment, at the show! I'm on the other side of the world, and didn't! I feel left out!
Come on Robin give James a break he tirelessly covers show after show which u and i watch for free
It is very interesting but please show each piece in total before you move around on the painting and through the exhibition - that would give us a much greater view of what the painting is - and celebrate that to look at art is also to be present with something
i was thinking exactly the same thing!
so when are we going to see a James Kalm exhibition videoed by all the artists he has shown.........this is a cool show......this stuff has integrity, something I think is lacking for the most part.....
Like the artwork "16 Songs" by Stanley Whitney.
How is binder and surface still so very important to mention?
Nice. Where is this ? I am abstract painter, I live in Norway, many I will visit. this place... Is it in. New York ?
🤞🤛✌🏻
5:36 epic
Thinks from iraq
True is I like your videos don't care for you cometary and critics if you don't talk will be lots better no one should crtic art or artist that privilege is a personal experience for a each individuals to enjoy and patetick dilusional galleries owners that are no different then a car dealership salesmen
So basically, he's copying illustrations/diagrams from science books and calling it 'abstract art'. It isn't. BTW Next time go when it's NOT a noisy opening. Just saying.
+tamsinthai what a little snob you are. condescending remarks and pointless recommendations.... youtube is saturated with you people... even though it's a characteristic of having depression, and that's fine, i'll never understand why people call out that they are depressed in this way.
Rrdd Ah, ad hominem attack over addressing the content of the post. And what are you talking about 'depression'? Fool.
tamsinthai attack? try to not to be so emotionally sensitive, this is youtube and your entertainment. i'm only responding to my entertainment. yours is the video. it wouldn't be the same without you depressed people on here.
fool? maybe, but i'm no snob.
Rrdd Look up 'ad hominem attack'. Duh.
tamsinthai this must be a word you learned recently in school and thinks it applies to everyone who emotionally offends you now.
i could apply this to anyone, easily. you did it to me for sure. what's the point of addressing it? your just deflecting. interesting...
Painting, a morbid artform. Totally.
Squeeze yourself some Beanfield, dude?
This is not a good way to look at paintings, and not a great way to comment on them. Didn’t enjoy.
Sad, boring, tired academic abstraction - but so typical of Cheim & Read gallery.