cool, glad someone liked it :P no, i'm not really tempted. i've been working without an engine for a long time, im used to my approach. back when i did use an engine occasionally, i think i did find it tempting to get the quick answers; that's largely why i 100% don't use them now: so i don't start slipping down a lazy path.
Did I miss your corresponding square video? An other request for a video noone made yet on youtube would be an overview of the Vaganian Gambit www.chess.com/article/view/when-white-avoids-the-benoni-the-vaganian-gambit
No, I don't think I've done a video on corresponding squares on youtube. You know, I play that, I could easily do a video on it. Thx for the suggestion.
great vid. aren't you awfully tempted to check a CPU and learn instantly which move was correct?
cool, glad someone liked it :P
no, i'm not really tempted. i've been working without an engine for a long time, im used to my approach. back when i did use an engine occasionally, i think i did find it tempting to get the quick answers; that's largely why i 100% don't use them now: so i don't start slipping down a lazy path.
I think it's good to verify your analysis with an engine.
ok
Did I miss your corresponding square video? An other request for a video noone made yet on youtube would be an overview of the Vaganian Gambit
www.chess.com/article/view/when-white-avoids-the-benoni-the-vaganian-gambit
No, I don't think I've done a video on corresponding squares on youtube.
You know, I play that, I could easily do a video on it. Thx for the suggestion.
@@chesscomdpruess tytyyy.