you can tell why hes got an ex-wife by the way he doesnt let anyone, not even a judge, speak without consistently trying to talk over them. can you imagine living with someone like that
I love her. She's always on the ball and catches the littlest things and waits till it comes back around and there's no way to squirm out of the lie. 😂😂 It's so satisfying when leans back, crosses her arms and begins to ask questions in slower cadence. I always sit up and think 🤔 Mmmmmmm what's she walking this person into😅🤣🤣😂 I'm pretty sure she enjoys really getting to the bottom of it. Judge Judy most of the time seems to have distane for both parties in most cases and isn't bothered in the least if the truth doesn't come out.
Exactly! How do you not notice there is an extra 650.00 in your account? Well .. I suppose if your Mr. Money bags .. or being sneaky and trying to cheat them.
Well, putting a stop payment on a check would make it not clear. Benefit of the doubt, he might not have researched why that one had a problem and assumed what was wrong. Of course, I think the plaintiff claimed the check had a stop payment and also that it cleared. I'm lost on some of the shenanigans......
Lmao did you just say that his girlfriend is married which is why she’s not willing to be publicly outed rather then the genuine reasoning that most likely she is actually Muslim and it wouldn’t go wel with her family???? That’s some energy to put out there!!
The pink shirt guy is an idiot! There weren’t two bad checks, and he knew it! He was incredulous that the “women” got involved in the transaction? Well, he’s the reason his ex-wife was involved…I guess he was too busy doing other things! I don’t think it is a stretch of the imagination as to the reason for their divorce. 🤣 I guess he thought he had every right to keep that deposit money. I am glad the Judge had a different thought!
@@Rain-oq7vh That does not necessarily make them old lol. There are lots of people who have enough in savings that the addition of $600 wouldn't be immediately obvious. Maybe they don't check the balance every day, or maybe they have an account they use for business that has a lot in it. Or, maybe they just have direct deposit and earn enough money that $600 isn't that big of a deal. Financially secure in no way equals old. Smh.
I used to work for a bank and stuff like this happens all the time. People don't always check their accounts online or sometimes the info isn't available yet and they rely purely on the statement.
There's been many times over the last few years where I have had so much in my checking account that I wouldn't notice. When you have 20k in your checking 600 bucks isn't as noticeable.
The pink shirt defendant is just a nasty dude. There was absolutely no reason other than nasty to mention the plaintiff and his girlfriend are an affair. The poor ex-wife she probably hates having to deal with this guy about the rental however he most likely refuses to sell and split the money. He just wants to make everybody's life miserable. You know darn well he knew everything that occurred and was just being an a$$hole about not returning the money. Horrible mean guy.
Depends on how much the check is, and how long it's been out. I sent a club a $10 membership fee (this was a LONG time ago) and the ppl held the cheque for almost 6 mos. (they staledate here at 6 mos. ) That night i remembered i'd been shopping...i wondered if there was enough money in the chequing account left to cover everything. So i was at the bank when it opened the next day to switch money from the savings account. Needless to say, the club had managed to put the chequed through the night before....the Bank, Bless them, were kind enough to NOT charge the bounced cheque fee....+
This is a case where two people who do not do their due diligence meet in a business transaction. They both made mistakes. Iono though, the plaintiff seemed like he was playing games giving a check, putting a stop payment on it, writing another bad check, anyone could have done this and on the day of the move say, I gave u a check! Why do u write a check without knowing u have money in the bank?
@@projectionv.accountability1010 I am sorry I am not using proper English on the comment section of People's Court...sheesh...does that bother u that much?
The plaintiff asked them to not deposit his check which was shady. I think he should have had his judgment lowered for wasting everyone's time, in his advanced age
@@TopherGrant So basically what you want is to live FREE of the hard work and backs of other people? Do you think private landlords don't have their own homes, bills, families, cars, medical expenses, and lives to pay for? They are hardly living Lifestyles of the Rich & Famous off of the rental income as evidenced by the many that had to sell their properties during the rent moratorium. That property YOU think you are entitled to live rent free in has a mortgage, property taxes, insurance, and repair expenses associated with it. Your post is replete with entitlement and stupidity. Get a fkin job and buy your own shit like the rest of us have to.
The plaintiff had a lot of nerve saying the judge was "intelligent" for ruling his way when meanwhile, he's out here bouncing checks and out here with a girlfriend that doesn't claim him and a whole ass wife! The judge is more intelligent than he will ever be but her smarts has nothing to do with why he won his case. It was all a technicality
@@Phayrone that's true! It was his secret girlfriend's check that bounced 🥴 But then he did contact the defendant to ask him to not cash the check and at that point it's like dude you are a little too long in the tooth to write a check and give it to someone and there be an issue with the check.
Hmmmmm 🤔 This one seems interesting. It's only in the introduction and I'm wondering if this even really a small claims case. It's over 500 I'm curious as to why it's not criminal fraud in some way.
You know what makes the defendant's version of why the check shenanigans {hiding it from his wife} makes sense? Because if the plaintiff's "business account" did not have enough money on hand to cover the check, and the other account did, why not just transfer the money from the other account to cover the check?
@@projectionv.accountability1010 I'm not following either. Lol. But I also thought he said the judge "wasn't intelligent enough" at first for some reason. Lol
Believe me when one of my check bounced I was floored I was so shocked, I don't pay and bounce a check knowing there's no money in the account because why would I want to have to pay an extra $35 Duh
If I was a landlord and had been informed that the first check has been canceled and here's another check and that one bounces, I wouldn't be checking my account to see if the other had been cashed, since I had been informed that it had been canceled meaning any money that I might have had would be taken back out of my account, but either way, this case was shady from the start and there is nothing to say that they would have moved in nor that they would have been good tenants...
This is why I do not accept personal checks. I collect the holding fee/first month's rent in cash or certified bank check after I check them out and approve them. The holding fee converts to rent at lease signing. If tenant backs out and doesn't take the place, they lose that money that is applied to rent while I try to secure another tenant. Then I make an appointment with them to sign the lease where they have to bring the balance at that time, again no personal check.
The plaintiff's girlfriend doesn't want anyone to know she is with him. That's easy to understand. He said his rent was due on April Fool's Day. I wonder what kind of business he owns? 🤔🙄🙄
Judge was trying to really figure out a mutual solution until pink shirt boy got snippy. Word of advice. Don't get snippy with a judge it's never going to work out in your favor
Those of us with a long torso have trouble finding ties long enough. Even then the little side is only gonna be a couple inches long. Not all of us are 5'8
@@TopherGrant Topher, thank you for the explanation. I assumed the difference would be where/when the fold happens. Perhaps the issue lies with tie manufacturers. Have a sparkling day!
"My ex wife had nothing to do with this" Ex wife owns the apartment showed the apartment deposited the cheque was texting back and forth with the plantifs girlfriend.
they planned to do that. it's a scam. a lot of them are doing this now. they're taking the check then saying the place isn't available. the other scam is to take the "application fee" then say the place isn't avail after collecting tons of "application fee"s. it's a known scam these landlords are doing.
No I think what happens is the court pays the settlement right away and then whoever is responsible has to pay the court back. Could be wrong but that seems like the only plausible explanation lol
This to me was a very confusing case between these two litigants. But I believe the women connected to these two on both sides should've stayed completely out of it which certainly wouldn't cut down much of the confusion. When women get involved there always seems to be drama and confusion amongst other things that comes along with it.
And that can be blamed on the plantiff and defendant. Never have someone else do your business and never do business with someone you have never met face to face. They were in the same area I take it. Everybody is stupid in this case. The men, the women.. maybe its in the water?
I think it has less to do with gender and more to do with no communication. There were four parties and on the defendants side they obviously didn't inform the other of interactions with plaintiffs side.
The women were all involved in the very beginning in place of the two litigants which is why things didn't work out. It should've been to two men from the start. Having the women involved ruined everything.
you can tell why hes got an ex-wife by the way he doesnt let anyone, not even a judge, speak without consistently trying to talk over them. can you imagine living with someone like that
It'll drive me insane.
@@DarkPhoenixSaga more than insane
@@jenniferodessa5998 True
Sounds like my sister
Talks all the time and says nothing
His wife was probably the same. That is one thing a couple should not have in common if it is going to work.
when he asked how did the girlfriend and his ex got involved.. im dead 😂
Wow, I couldn't imagine being in my 50's and still worrying about what my family thinks about who I'm seeing?
And still passing bad checks 🥴
I I thought the exact same thing!
@@CleveNative THAT PART!
I know right! Like I don’t give any f**cks
Different cultures is not hard to comprehend or respect
J.M's "What did you just say?" Was impressive, because some people might have just continued with their sentence.
That was just an asshole situation. He’s the one got his ex doing all the work!
I love her. She's always on the ball and catches the littlest things and waits till it comes back around and there's no way to squirm out of the lie. 😂😂 It's so satisfying when leans back, crosses her arms and begins to ask questions in slower cadence. I always sit up and think 🤔 Mmmmmmm what's she walking this person into😅🤣🤣😂 I'm pretty sure she enjoys really getting to the bottom of it. Judge Judy most of the time seems to have distane for both parties in most cases and isn't bothered in the least if the truth doesn't come out.
Why does he keep saying " 2 bad checks" when there wasn't 2 bad checks!!!! This guy can't get it through his thick skull..
We see why he’s divorced. He’s an idiot. I wish judge Judy was in front of the case
Exactly! How do you not notice there is an extra 650.00 in your account? Well .. I suppose if your Mr. Money bags .. or being sneaky and trying to cheat them.
Well, putting a stop payment on a check would make it not clear. Benefit of the doubt, he might not have researched why that one had a problem and assumed what was wrong.
Of course, I think the plaintiff claimed the check had a stop payment and also that it cleared. I'm lost on some of the shenanigans......
Dude, she’s married and you a fool. 🤣
Lmao did you just say that his girlfriend is married which is why she’s not willing to be publicly outed rather then the genuine reasoning that most likely she is actually Muslim and it wouldn’t go wel with her family????
That’s some energy to put out there!!
A married woman writing a check for an apt? How silly. Someone having an affair wouldn’t just go writing checks.
Someone’s married, I actually don’t think he made that up
The pink shirt guy is an idiot! There weren’t two bad checks, and he knew it! He was incredulous that the “women” got involved in the transaction? Well, he’s the reason his ex-wife was involved…I guess he was too busy doing other things! I don’t think it is a stretch of the imagination as to the reason for their divorce. 🤣 I guess he thought he had every right to keep that deposit money. I am glad the Judge had a different thought!
The way the litigants made eye contact immediately after the ruling I thought they were going to tackle each other 🤣🤣
Trust me when I tell you I KNOW when I have 600 extra dollars in an account..
Right!!?!? Like how much savings do they have! So lucky if that is the case for them they old
@@Rain-oq7vh That does not necessarily make them old lol. There are lots of people who have enough in savings that the addition of $600 wouldn't be immediately obvious. Maybe they don't check the balance every day, or maybe they have an account they use for business that has a lot in it. Or, maybe they just have direct deposit and earn enough money that $600 isn't that big of a deal. Financially secure in no way equals old. Smh.
I used to work for a bank and stuff like this happens all the time. People don't always check their accounts online or sometimes the info isn't available yet and they rely purely on the statement.
There's been many times over the last few years where I have had so much in my checking account that I wouldn't notice. When you have 20k in your checking 600 bucks isn't as noticeable.
Anytime someone mentions Craigslist you automatically can assume its not going to turn out well lol.
No matter how dated the case is😂
The defendant CLEARLY isn’t the brightest bulb 💡 in the pack 🤦🏾♀️🤷🏾♀️😣😳😒😜😂
or bright at all🤣🤣🤣
…yet he somehow feels he knows everything and other people are all idiots. I know a few people like that…
It's beyond me why he thought he could keep the money
Terrible landlord. Despicable person. He tried to rob that man. It's a shame of how many slumlords are out there.
Yep and mines one as well
What a shyster! Actually, plaintiff is lucky to not have him for a landlord
Solution: stop having idiotic unfaithful relationships
He wasn’t
Nobody was unfaithful lol
Pink shirt guy may not get it ( sure )
But the judge sure had it straight.
She is one smart judge.
She’s incredible, I hope she runs for governor of Florida
The pink shirt defendant is just a nasty dude. There was absolutely no reason other than nasty to mention the plaintiff and his girlfriend are an affair. The poor ex-wife she probably hates having to deal with this guy about the rental however he most likely refuses to sell and split the money. He just wants to make everybody's life miserable. You know darn well he knew everything that occurred and was just being an a$$hole about not returning the money. Horrible mean guy.
Maybe he should of taken care of his own apt. He should of never got his Ex wife involved..
Why would any smart landlord rent to someone that bounced checks before actually living there. They wouldn't. Definitely a snake in the wood pile.
well technically the first check didn't bounce, so...
The judgement was fair enough according to the plaintiff 👌👌👍
Depends on how much the check is, and how long it's been out. I sent a club a $10 membership fee (this was a LONG time ago) and the ppl held the cheque for almost 6 mos. (they staledate here at 6 mos. ) That night i remembered i'd been shopping...i wondered if there was enough money in the chequing account left to cover everything. So i was at the bank when it opened the next day to switch money from the savings account. Needless to say, the club had managed to put the chequed through the night before....the Bank, Bless them, were kind enough to NOT charge the bounced cheque fee....+
This is a case where two people who do not do their due diligence meet in a business transaction. They both made mistakes. Iono though, the plaintiff seemed like he was playing games giving a check, putting a stop payment on it, writing another bad check, anyone could have done this and on the day of the move say, I gave u a check! Why do u write a check without knowing u have money in the bank?
Iono? Please don't tell me that's supposed to be "I don't know".
@@projectionv.accountability1010 if you understood it, why would you question it?
@@BriannaTshelle Alright, I am questioning it. What does it mean?
@@projectionv.accountability1010 I am sorry I am not using proper English on the comment section of People's Court...sheesh...does that bother u that much?
Well it was explained. You can’t keep my money after you cancelled the contract
Only $650 a month? What year was this?
first he throws the guy under the bus saying he's cheating, then he's surprises when the other one mentions his ex....lol
Jm has her picks on who can call her Ma’am and who has to call her your honor
& who she berates etc...
Unbenonuced to me..I watched this whole episode 🤣
How you gonna do business with someone you have never seen face to face? Red flag.
I don’t know if I’m just tired or what but I got a little confused in this case 🥴
me too. English is not my first language so I thought it was me…thank you
If the Plaintiff put a stop payment on the business check, how was the defendant able to cash it?? He must not have called his bank right away. 🤔🤔🤔
Yes that’s what happened.
@@C3yl0 are you the gf? 🤔
The only thing I don’t agree with is that she should have made the plaintiff pay the bounced check fee…
Not technically because his check didn’t bounce the girlfriend’s did that’s her suit not his
The plaintiff asked them to not deposit his check which was shady. I think he should have had his judgment lowered for wasting everyone's time, in his advanced age
@@CleveNative not really, though. He just realized later that he wrote it out of the wrong account. I’ve done it accidentally before. I’m not shady. 😎
His check didn’t was his gf.
That wasn’t his check that bounced
"Oh God, please don't say shenanigans."
How did the exwife and girlfriend get involved? He said his exwife was involved because he was away on business 😂😂😂 what was he smoking?!
He also said they own the property together.
I should be a landlord. Free money every month. Never have to work again. Let others pay your bills and sue them when they can't. Lol what a racket
Yep it’s great! :)
Until stuff starts breaking down.
Yes, you definitely should! How many properties do you own?
@@loganpelletier none. Hence why I said I SHOULD be. 🙄
@@TopherGrant So basically what you want is to live FREE of the hard work and backs of other people? Do you think private landlords don't have their own homes, bills, families, cars, medical expenses, and lives to pay for? They are hardly living Lifestyles of the Rich & Famous off of the rental income as evidenced by the many that had to sell their properties during the rent moratorium. That property YOU think you are entitled to live rent free in has a mortgage, property taxes, insurance, and repair expenses associated with it. Your post is replete with entitlement and stupidity. Get a fkin job and buy your own shit like the rest of us have to.
The plaintiff had a lot of nerve saying the judge was "intelligent" for ruling his way when meanwhile, he's out here bouncing checks and out here with a girlfriend that doesn't claim him and a whole ass wife! The judge is more intelligent than he will ever be but her smarts has nothing to do with why he won his case. It was all a technicality
Well technically, his check didn't bounce, his girlfriend's did. And who is still using checks?
@@Phayrone that's true! It was his secret girlfriend's check that bounced 🥴
But then he did contact the defendant to ask him to not cash the check and at that point it's like dude you are a little too long in the tooth to write a check and give it to someone and there be an issue with the check.
His check didn't bounce, try again.
@@Phayrone Checks are used by adults in business transactions every day. Once you grow up and make some big boy buys you'll understand.
@@Spankmepink -SUREEEE, except he says he didn't want to use his business account. And this wasn't for his business use.
Gahhhh... this was skanky all around. Neither one of them could keep the ex-wives and girlfriends straight.
He cut the plaintiff fast as hell lol at the end lol
He keeps saying 2 bad checks but it was 1. And his ex wife didn't allow them to have the key. He clearly owes the money
The defendant was mad at the plaintiff. If a look could kill 😮
How do you not know you’ve got the money?
Oh! He's gonna loose! He said ma'am instead of "your honor".
well he should know better. Etiquette is important….get over it.
To this day he is still trying to figure out how the ex wife got involved
so true. His ex wife is involved!!! Lack of communication between these two exes…..
😂😂😂 "Somebody help me figure this out: how does my ex-wife keep getting in my business!?"
WHAT A CASE! This belongs in Jerry Springer!
Drink every time the plaintiff says “girlfriend”
Who even writes checks nowadays?!?
older people….it is what it is. As long as checks exists people will use them. Get over it
@@gracemunich1476 lol
Hmmmmm 🤔 This one seems interesting. It's only in the introduction and I'm wondering if this even really a small claims case. It's over 500 I'm curious as to why it's not criminal fraud in some way.
Uh, oh.....I'm f'ed! 13:03 😆
I’m the boy in the back with the 2 finger snap 👌🏻😂
trying to keep up with the bouncing checks…..
He keeps saying two bad checks but it was just 1 bad check. He is a jerk. He wouldn't even shut up when the judge was talking....
Why does the plaintiff sound like Dan from Steve Wilkos 😂
You know what makes the defendant's version of why the check shenanigans {hiding it from his wife} makes sense?
Because if the plaintiff's "business account" did not have enough money on hand to cover the check, and the other account did, why not just transfer the money from the other account to cover the check?
The plantif sounds like James woods.
Did the plaintiff, who won his judgment just insult the judge by saying she was intelligent enough to know the defendant was wrong?
You see Doug he wrapped up that interview with the quickness...lol
I'm not following (I also have the flu so if it's obvious, sorry) How was it insulting?
People often say a judge is "intelligent" when the verdict goes their way.
@@crystalshaw8744 That's not Doug.
@@projectionv.accountability1010 I'm not following either. Lol. But I also thought he said the judge "wasn't intelligent enough" at first for some reason. Lol
The ending had me dead
Landlord needs to have a better business plan. Too messy.
Why does anyone trust this Craigs list> Seems like there are a lot of shady people advertising on it.
Stop renting folks let's get these landlord out of here
Believe me when one of my check bounced I was floored I was so shocked, I don't pay and bounce a check knowing there's no money in the account because why would I want to have to pay an extra $35 Duh
This crook thought he can keep the deposit. Kept saying why his ex was involved....wonder if he was acting or just plain stupid!!!
If I was a landlord and had been informed that the first check has been canceled and here's another check and that one bounces, I wouldn't be checking my account to see if the other had been cashed, since I had been informed that it had been canceled meaning any money that I might have had would be taken back out of my account, but either way, this case was shady from the start and there is nothing to say that they would have moved in nor that they would have been good tenants...
The landlord cashed his check. The only one that bounced was the tenants girlfriend.
What a disaster 🤯
This world is becoming the movie Idiocracy
I bounced a check without knowing. My bank put the money to cover that check in an account that didn't belong to me instead of mine. Fun stuff
Dont do checks - who still uses checks.... cash is king (only if followed by a receipt)
i am so confused…..😊
intelligence..pretty much sure that is a job requirement for a Judge...
??
This is why I do not accept personal checks. I collect the holding fee/first month's rent in cash or certified bank check after I check them out and approve them. The holding fee converts to rent at lease signing. If tenant backs out and doesn't take the place, they lose that money that is applied to rent while I try to secure another tenant. Then I make an appointment with them to sign the lease where they have to bring the balance at that time, again no personal check.
The landlord is nuts
The plaintiff's girlfriend doesn't want anyone to know she is with him. That's easy to understand. He said his rent was due on April Fool's Day. I wonder what kind of business he owns? 🤔🙄🙄
Man, i used to live near Santa Monica where Harvey does these interviews. I wish i knew about it, I'd SO be there!
Shady landlord.
They didn’t write 2 bad checks.
Exe's and affair ? Both women didn't showed up lol
They was all getting on my nerves
She wanted to make the plaintiff from the very beginning :/
if you wear shirts that need ironing, buy an iron and use it!
unbeknownst is my new favorite word
my girlfriend did this his ex wife did that my ex wife did ...
this is crazy
8:40 the moment the defendant says something he regrets big time
Judge was trying to really figure out a mutual solution until pink shirt boy got snippy. Word of advice. Don't get snippy with a judge it's never going to work out in your favor
Pink shirt 👚 is a 🤥 liar!
John, an adult male tie is supposed to come to the waist.
Those of us with a long torso have trouble finding ties long enough. Even then the little side is only gonna be a couple inches long. Not all of us are 5'8
@@TopherGrant Topher, thank you for the explanation. I assumed the difference would be where/when the fold happens. Perhaps the issue lies with tie manufacturers. Have a sparkling day!
"My ex wife had nothing to do with this"
Ex wife owns the apartment showed the apartment deposited the cheque was texting back and forth with the plantifs girlfriend.
SRB
some of the "bailout money went through "FEMA/ Nott to ..., through / //
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
they planned to do that. it's a scam. a lot of them are doing this now. they're taking the check then saying the place isn't available. the other scam is to take the "application fee" then say the place isn't avail after collecting tons of "application fee"s. it's a known scam these landlords are doing.
again verdict is bias
More Bounce.
Hi
Lol yeah. Pretty high
I know he's the producer of the show, but Harvey Levin just comes across as so slimy. Yuck 🤮
Wow
why not move in with the gf?
Defendant is ANNOYING
Too many suspects to make a decision. Plaintiff, Dependent, wife, ex-wife, girlfriend and son. Throw the case out!
i'm in love with the defendant. hot. this was a really good and exciting case.
There's more than a person then just looks lol
The plaintiff sounds like James Woods
But because the Show pays all the judgements the landlord gets to keep that $650. So no matter what the defendant wins. No justice here.
No I think what happens is the court pays the settlement right away and then whoever is responsible has to pay the court back. Could be wrong but that seems like the only plausible explanation lol
Haha haha haha haha haha haha haha haha haha haha haha haha haha haha haha haha haha haha haha haha haha haha haha haha haha haha haha haha haha haha haha haha haha haha haha haha haha
What a crook the renter is
This to me was a very confusing case between these two litigants. But I believe the women connected to these two on both sides should've stayed completely out of it which certainly wouldn't cut down much of the confusion. When women get involved there always seems to be drama and confusion amongst other things that comes along with it.
Hate to say it but its true...and I'm a woman.
Least you're one of the few honest women.
And that can be blamed on the plantiff and defendant. Never have someone else do your business and never do business with someone you have never met face to face. They were in the same area I take it. Everybody is stupid in this case. The men, the women.. maybe its in the water?
I think it has less to do with gender and more to do with no communication. There were four parties and on the defendants side they obviously didn't inform the other of interactions with plaintiffs side.
The women were all involved in the very beginning in place of the two litigants which is why things didn't work out. It should've been to two men from the start. Having the women involved ruined everything.
So you’re a businessman who pays zero attention to your financial situation. Got it.