Bernoulli Equation: Example 3 [Fluid Mechanics #26]

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 13 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 46

  • @qwertywertybird
    @qwertywertybird 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Best channel for learning fluid mechanics

    • @muhammadjoshua7464
      @muhammadjoshua7464 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Dani Barker the last i time i used this channel two years ago.
      I've got A on fluid mechanics.

  • @shellynyin9209
    @shellynyin9209 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    1. Pay attension v2 is just the point velocity at point 2, not mean sectional velocity. So we should use velocity distribution to obtain the mean velocity V and then calculate Q by AV.
    2. If point 1 and 2 are on a same horizontal line, which means they are not on the same sreamline due to different tube size, we can not apply Bernoulli Eq for them.

  • @DontLookLikeAFool
    @DontLookLikeAFool 12 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Nice example! One thing to be sure for the flow rate, the area of the end of the tube is pi*r^2, but the D on the diagram is mean Diameter. So the Q Should be pi * (D/2)^2*V2 right?

  • @IndieGirl247
    @IndieGirl247 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why is the fluid in the left tube in static equilibrium but not the fluid in the right tube? And if both tubes are in static equilibrium shouldn't V1 and V2 both be zero?

  • @battonfive
    @battonfive 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dude you make that equation look so elegant and yet it still frys my brain :-) The worst part is the online calculator agrees with my logic a bit but I still don't trust the answer :-p thanks for the great share, its helped :-)

    • @SimmySigma
      @SimmySigma  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Aw, thank you for the comment!! I’m glad it helped. 😊

    • @battonfive
      @battonfive 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@SimmySigma alot thanks :-) I'm still wrapping my head around the relationship between flow speed and volume and over flow and laminar flow :-) I must admit I don't think I have covered that much ground so far to the point I will rewatch this video and try another round :-p I'm just shocked water can be so complicated and bernoulli so clever :-D

  • @samuelhampongo7278
    @samuelhampongo7278 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Do you have some PDFs ....best channel...am loving it!

  • @Asahel717
    @Asahel717 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very good video. I was confused at first when you wrote (-h2 - 0) but then I realized where you drew your datum (it is different from the datum point you began the video with). Really enjoyed this video. Thanks.

  • @SimmySigma
    @SimmySigma  12 ปีที่แล้ว

    You are right. But when I square the (D/2), it becomes (D^2)/4, because I have to square the denominator as well. I factor out the (1/4) and thats where i get pi/4. :)

    • @salarkhan5722
      @salarkhan5722 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      why v1=0? cant get it

    • @kevin15664
      @kevin15664 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Because of stagnation. Theres essentially no fluid movement at that area

  • @anilsharma-ev2my
    @anilsharma-ev2my 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Burnouli equations holding how much maximum energy flow under NTP STP 🙏🙏🙏❓❓❓❓❓

  • @AjayiPelumi
    @AjayiPelumi 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great work with units I can get behind! :) Thank you!

  • @anilsharma-ev2my
    @anilsharma-ev2my 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is differential or integrated formula for this theorem??

  • @12park12
    @12park12 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for the upload!

  • @Mustafa-xk7ly
    @Mustafa-xk7ly 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Why velocity at 2 is not zero since velocity at 1 is zero ?

    • @Test-ri2kr
      @Test-ri2kr 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Horizontal velocity is not affected, but vertical velocity would be 0.

  • @patriotmk141
    @patriotmk141 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    how is P4=0? ist it the atmospheric pressure?

    • @massivepidas1065
      @massivepidas1065 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Same question actually. If the other hand was exposed to the atmosphere, it'd make sense because the pressures would cancel each other. But that's not the case

    • @marcrogue5268
      @marcrogue5268 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The idea comes from the fact that the atmosphere act everywhere in all direction so the atmospheric pressure cancels out anyways if you add it on the equation Patm+P1= Patm+pgh notice how Patm cancels out atmospheric pressure is always present sort of like gravity unless ur in a vacuum and it’s about 15psi believe

    • @nickkenny1789
      @nickkenny1789 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If your pressure are gauge pressures then atmospheric pressure is zero

  • @ccmmele
    @ccmmele 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome Vid Simmy, How would your answer differ if you used the original Datum (the one used for the z's in the bernoulli equation) for all the temporary datum you used earlier in the video. Please, Please reply.

    • @SimmySigma
      @SimmySigma  9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ogbonna Chris Thank you! If we used the original datum, the answer would still be the same. Take, for an example, P1. If we used our original datum, the pressure at point 1 would be -gamma*(0 - h2) = gamma*h2. Datums are just reference points relative to the points you are interested in. Try it out on paper and see if you get the same result! Hope this helps!

  • @sajedamarie2611
    @sajedamarie2611 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can you please explain why z1 and z2 cancel out? How is h2 = h1 ?

    • @Asahel717
      @Asahel717 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sajeda, look at where he establishes his datum (y = 0). Since they share a common datum, z1 and z2 in the energy equation cancel out. His datum varies throughout his solution, but when he comes to the energy equation his datum is the point furthest to the right, from where h1 and h2 are referenced.

  • @muhamedguri3994
    @muhamedguri3994 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Are we supposed to use the big diameter (0.1m) to find Q?

  • @JohnWilliams-dd7up
    @JohnWilliams-dd7up 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    It would have been a nice video if you explained what gamma represented.

  • @belayzeleke2288
    @belayzeleke2288 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    it is a good example but you should have to write giving space to see again legibly

  • @ice-313
    @ice-313 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why can u say the velocity at 1 is equal to 0 whereas velocity at 2 isn’t ?

  • @melissamelissa8001
    @melissamelissa8001 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks ❤️❤️❤️

  • @CraigBass1988
    @CraigBass1988 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice video. Out of curiosity (perhaps it is american notation) why do you use Gamma for density as opposed to Rho?

    • @Porty1119
      @Porty1119 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Craig Schofield Gamma denotes specific weight rather than density.

    • @Asahel717
      @Asahel717 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Craig, gamma = rho (density) x g (9.81 m/sec^2).

  • @Tadakazu95
    @Tadakazu95 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    why dont you consider the pressure from the atmosphere?

    • @atakan716
      @atakan716 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      here the gauge pressure is equal to 0

  • @samuelmapokotera1818
    @samuelmapokotera1818 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    l didnt really understand why Z1 and Z2 became equal...isnt Z1 equal to H2 and Z2 equal to H1??

    • @Asahel717
      @Asahel717 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Samuel, he establishes the elevations of pt. 1 and pt. 2 at the datum to the far right; therefore, z1 and z2 share a common datum and there is no elevation difference between the two points. His reference frame is correct.

  • @CraigBass1988
    @CraigBass1988 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Apologies, I've just realised you're using Gamma for weight density.

  • @kunalpatil738
    @kunalpatil738 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Classic example...

  • @danabarokova
    @danabarokova ปีที่แล้ว

    incorrect