Hey Insane Curiosity Squad! If you liked the video, we would love for you to share it with your friends or on other social networks like Facebook, Reddit Instagram, Tik Tok and Twitter, etc.. ( Since the algorithm is not cooperating in showing us to the public). In just 30 seconds, you will greatly help our Channel to grow and improve our future content. A big thank you from all of us.
I still struggle to understand how a Nutrino can “pass through” everything? Is a Nutrino Matter or Electricity or ….. ? Why are humans, plants and animals not impacted by this “thing” that passes through everything? Was just at Fermi Labs in Batavia, Illinois (a western suburb of Chicago). So fascinating as a layperson just trying to understand Science better. Be Well.
This is a great question, I'll try to explain it the best I can. According to physics, there are only 4 types of forces in the universe. They are strong force,weak force, electromagnetic force and gravity. In order for us to "see" or detect something, they have to interact with something. For example, light is carried by photons, and we can "see" them because these photons interact with matter. Neutrinos only interact under weak force. As the name suggests, they interact with matter very weakly. So they just pass through us.
Because the atom is mostly empty space. *From a particle physics perspective.... I find considering the actual form of reality a little helpful. Every 'particle' is merely a point within a field of maximum displacement from its optimal rest state. The reason the Neutrino field does not readily interact with other fields or field modalities is that the wave form of the neutrino is not coherent with the waveforms of those within the nucleus. Think of it kinda like light waves not affecting radio waves, or trying to swing yourself on a swing but not getting the timing of your body movements right. Question is, what component of the protons harmonic structure does the neutrino represent? (things resonate when they are in harmony, which is what 'glues' them together in some circumstances, but if you can corrupt the harmonics by altering one or more of the frequencies that the harmonic is composed of then you can collapse the harmonic, or disrupt it to a sufficient degree, so that it reverts back to a set of individual frequencies effectively. These frequencies may recombine into other resonant structures that are configurable and it allows the ideal rest state/structure to be 'drawn' closer' The frequencies of each individual component are unique and the collective is a unique harmonic so it should be achievable to identify the variation in wave form to understand what individual frequency is fundamental to all the harmonics which make up the structures that underlay physical matter, yet being unique amongst individual frequencies. Somewhat like a denominator like 5, but in a base 9 system (within the same order of magnitude. Ie; 9x10 is the largest progression in the sequence) where there is only a single step in the entire sequence that is divisible by 5. With the resonant frequency of an electron being that of 3 (in this cas3) where it interacts with the 5 at 15, 30, 45, 60, 75 and 90.... So i wonder what imbalance is missing out of the equation after the neutrino is emitted? *There is no such thing as perfectly equal and opposite, other wise nature would be cancelling out everything that it could. Until there was nothing but the existence of a non existent state of energy. Ie; the inverse waveform of the fundamental frequency... Basically the universe existing inside the node point of its fundamental frequency, in a perfect state of fluidity where all points of energy could be equally expressed as the entirety of the field and no displacement of any kind whatsoever was necessary to achieve any form of transition whatsoever. Nope, its obvious nature is not capable of that, yet, but rather seems to exist in a perpetual state of the eternal instance, through the balance of a perfectly imbalance... Where the waste energy that bleeds off is what fuels the fundamental component of the energy it uses to feed on...
Man back in the late 80s and early 90s, I saw Neutrinos all the time. Yep, they were on the tv show in the afternoons after school. TMNT had episodes when a tiny car with a couple of people in it and they were Neutrinos. Lol. No I know they have a giant pool with a doom filled with lights. Everytime a neutrino would hit a light, it would lite up. I saw a video on this and they were in a small boat watching and waiting. It's pretty cool that they figured away to detect them. This is something that doesn't interact with anything. They fly through us all day and night with nothing to show for it.
Why do Scientists insist on only using 1 of their senses? Their eyes? The foundation of matter and everything in the Universe is Frequency. Frequency and Vibration. In Fact Frequency + Vibration = energy.
seems that their name is more elusive than neutrinos themselves, since this video about neutrinos omitted to say that the neutrino ("little neutral one" in italian) was named by italian physicists edoardo amaldi and enrico fermi (the father of the atomic bomb)..
At least the automated narration dispenses useful information. Worse than that is the often meaningless stock footage that rarely correlates to the narration.
If the neutrino oscillation depends on the magnetic field strength, then a neutrino energy absorber could be created in the laboratory, which would be a better producer of green energy than thermonuclear reactors. Maybe it is the energy of oscillating neutrinos that heats the solar corona to millions of degrees in the magnetic field. If people manage to achieve a magnetic field of 1000 Tesla in the laboratory, I think it will be enough for neutrinos to oscillate every few meters from an electron neutrino to a tau neutrino and release energy, returning to the electron neutrino state again. Under the conditions of the Sun's magnetic field, neutrinos oscillate approximately every 300,000 km.
Yeah, if it exists.... And according to Einstein himself, there really should NOT be such a thing. So you're literally comparing something that we know for a fact exists, to something we've never had even a hint of evidence for, and Einstein says shouldn't exist.
@@junemoonchild69 Common sense helps. I literally agreed with the person I was replying to..... "If it exists" Way to show off how well you did in highschool. 😆
@@KingAntDaProphet No one said it can't. But, Relativity and quantum mechanics are the 2 most tested theories we have. And of those 2, on Relativity has never been proven wrong, between the quantum world and a black hole. According to relativity what we perceive as gravity, is just energy/matter warping spacetime, and we just follow that curvature in spacetime itself. A particle is needed to transfer the force from something over a distance. Gravity isn't a force. It's you following spacetime's shape. Think of it like a NASCAR racetrack. If you don't watch a lot of NASCAR, you probably don't know that there's a specific speed(for each corner of the track) that you can enter the corner at with your steering wheel dead-straight, and come out the other side, without ever turning your steering wheel from dead straight. You literally go around the corner without turning your steering wheel. Spacetime is like a 3D version of that. When you orbit around another object, you're actually traveling in a straight line...... (I'll look up a science video about that straight line for you when I get off work tonight) While gravitons could exist, there's no reason to expect them to, and the theory of relativity works without them. And BTW, the graviton was only thought up because when you put quantum mechanics and gravity together, you get absolute trash out of the math. A particle would allow QM to fix a lot of its problems. That's not evidence of the particle existing. In other words, the idea of a graviton isn't a theory, it's not even an hypothesis. It's a made-up idea based on the fact that a particle would help their math. Not on any evidence at all. The graviton is a hope, not science.
i stay away from robot voices now. im sure the info in here is good but im gonna look for a human talking about it. scared about when we cant tell the difference tbh
@@InsaneCuriosity seek /sēk/ verb attempt to find (something). "they came here to seek shelter from biting winter winds" attempt or desire to obtain or achieve (something). "the new regime sought his extradition" ask for (something) from someone. "he sought help from the police"
@@InsaneCuriosity shall /SHal/  verb 1. (in the first person) expressing the future tense. "this time next week I shall be in Scotland" 2. expressing a strong assertion or intention. "they shall succeed"
very poor word flow. No reason to pause between words mid-sentence. Seems like you aren't reading the script a few times before recording. Speed it up.
@@nopenope4402 At first I thought it might be an AI voice reading the script but after listening to more of the video I think you're right. The guy reading the script just has an unusual rhythm or cadence when speaking and taking quick breaths between sentences. Maybe not all the time, but at least while reading out loud, which in this context is what counts.
Hey Insane Curiosity Squad! If you liked the video, we would love for you to share it with your friends or on other social networks like Facebook, Reddit Instagram, Tik Tok and Twitter, etc.. ( Since the algorithm is not cooperating in showing us to the public). In just 30 seconds, you will greatly help our Channel to grow and improve our future content. A big thank you from all of us.
yes i loved this video and i want more videos of this subject!!
I still struggle to understand how a Nutrino can “pass through” everything?
Is a Nutrino Matter or Electricity or ….. ?
Why are humans, plants and animals not impacted by this “thing” that passes through everything?
Was just at Fermi Labs in Batavia, Illinois (a western suburb of Chicago).
So fascinating as a layperson just trying to understand Science better.
Be Well.
This is a great question, I'll try to explain it the best I can. According to physics, there are only 4 types of forces in the universe. They are strong force,weak force, electromagnetic force and gravity. In order for us to "see" or detect something, they have to interact with something. For example, light is carried by photons, and we can "see" them because these photons interact with matter. Neutrinos only interact under weak force. As the name suggests, they interact with matter very weakly. So they just pass through us.
Because it is very very small
Because the atom is mostly empty space. *From a particle physics perspective....
I find considering the actual form of reality a little helpful. Every 'particle' is merely a point within a field of maximum displacement from its optimal rest state. The reason the Neutrino field does not readily interact with other fields or field modalities is that the wave form of the neutrino is not coherent with the waveforms of those within the nucleus. Think of it kinda like light waves not affecting radio waves, or trying to swing yourself on a swing but not getting the timing of your body movements right.
Question is,
what component of the protons harmonic structure does the neutrino represent? (things resonate when they are in harmony, which is what 'glues' them together in some circumstances, but if you can corrupt the harmonics by altering one or more of the frequencies that the harmonic is composed of then you can collapse the harmonic, or disrupt it to a sufficient degree, so that it reverts back to a set of individual frequencies effectively. These frequencies may recombine into other resonant structures that are configurable and it allows the ideal rest state/structure to be 'drawn' closer'
The frequencies of each individual component are unique and the collective is a unique harmonic so it should be achievable to identify the variation in wave form to understand what individual frequency is fundamental to all the harmonics which make up the structures that underlay physical matter, yet being unique amongst individual frequencies.
Somewhat like a denominator like 5, but in a base 9 system (within the same order of magnitude. Ie; 9x10 is the largest progression in the sequence) where there is only a single step in the entire sequence that is divisible by 5. With the resonant frequency of an electron being that of 3 (in this cas3) where it interacts with the 5 at 15, 30, 45, 60, 75 and 90....
So i wonder what imbalance is missing out of the equation after the neutrino is emitted?
*There is no such thing as perfectly equal and opposite, other wise nature would be cancelling out everything that it could. Until there was nothing but the existence of a non existent state of energy. Ie; the inverse waveform of the fundamental frequency... Basically the universe existing inside the node point of its fundamental frequency, in a perfect state of fluidity where all points of energy could be equally expressed as the entirety of the field and no displacement of any kind whatsoever was necessary to achieve any form of transition whatsoever.
Nope, its obvious nature is not capable of that, yet, but rather seems to exist in a perpetual state of the eternal instance, through the balance of a perfectly imbalance...
Where the waste energy that bleeds off is what fuels the fundamental component of the energy it uses to feed on...
Man back in the late 80s and early 90s, I saw Neutrinos all the time. Yep, they were on the tv show in the afternoons after school. TMNT had episodes when a tiny car with a couple of people in it and they were Neutrinos. Lol.
No I know they have a giant pool with a doom filled with lights. Everytime a neutrino would hit a light, it would lite up. I saw a video on this and they were in a small boat watching and waiting. It's pretty cool that they figured away to detect them. This is something that doesn't interact with anything. They fly through us all day and night with nothing to show for it.
I disagree.
Thank you for this incredible video! It really helps me for my oral exams!
How come this video doesn’t have subtitles when the subtitle function is turned on 😮
Even the subtitle-bot couldn't listen to this.
The neutrino is just a baby neutron ... 👶 (kidding of course)
I believe it was Enrico Fermi who named it. It means “little neutral one” in Italian.
@@richardmercer2337 or perhaps the pokemon evolution chain... Neutron -> neutrino -> neutrizard 😆
Neutron converts to proton ?? Is that right. 1:18
@@rahulchattopadhyay03 yep! Search radioactive processes. Particles turn into others all the time
Awesome.❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤.
Thanks 🤗
Ok..now what do I do with this information?
Share them :)
just three scientists with some test tubes gathered around a microscrope, observing a proton turning into a neutron.
Yes, I noticed that also. What a ridiculous clip to insert into this video. They look like Hollywood actors doing a Hollywood version of scientists.
Lolz. Now THAT'S funny.
Perfect !!!🦠🦠🔬🔬
Why do Scientists insist on only using 1 of their senses? Their eyes? The foundation of matter and everything in the Universe is Frequency. Frequency and Vibration. In Fact Frequency + Vibration = energy.
Why exactly are you showing pictures that have NOTHING to do with the actual topic ?????
AI run channel, low effort TTS and most likely auto found/generated stock video based on the script
"do you want to know more about this" well yeah I clicked on it, didnt I.. no need to tell me to watch it for more information =)
seems that their name is more elusive than neutrinos themselves, since this video about neutrinos omitted to say that the neutrino ("little neutral one" in italian) was named by italian physicists edoardo amaldi and enrico fermi (the father of the atomic bomb)..
Subtitles stop 2 minutes in, would have finished the video if I could 🤷♀️
This all makes sense in a string theory universe.
yes bro I want to learn more, thats why I clicked the video
The audio is awful now. What happened?
What instantly put me off this video is the AI generated narrative (Note I said me, not you)
At least the automated narration dispenses useful information. Worse than that is the often meaningless stock footage that rarely correlates to the narration.
Absolutely no, this script is written by a physics
5:11 Thousands?
Other guy reckons Trillions....
that’s a good question
If the neutrino oscillation depends on the magnetic field strength, then a neutrino energy absorber could be created in the laboratory, which would be a better producer of green energy than thermonuclear reactors. Maybe it is the energy of oscillating neutrinos that heats the solar corona to millions of degrees in the magnetic field. If people manage to achieve a magnetic field of 1000 Tesla in the laboratory, I think it will be enough for neutrinos to oscillate every few meters from an electron neutrino to a tau neutrino and release energy, returning to the electron neutrino state again. Under the conditions of the Sun's magnetic field, neutrinos oscillate approximately every 300,000 km.
I thought the graviton is the most elusive particle.......if it exists.
Yeah, if it exists....
And according to Einstein himself, there really should NOT be such a thing.
So you're literally comparing something that we know for a fact exists, to something we've never had even a hint of evidence for, and Einstein says shouldn't exist.
@@lordgarion514 why can't it exist
@@lordgarion514 What if someone had just blown off Einstein, like you just did to this person's thought? 😒
@@junemoonchild69
Common sense helps.
I literally agreed with the person I was replying to.....
"If it exists"
Way to show off how well you did in highschool. 😆
@@KingAntDaProphet
No one said it can't.
But, Relativity and quantum mechanics are the 2 most tested theories we have.
And of those 2, on Relativity has never been proven wrong, between the quantum world and a black hole.
According to relativity what we perceive as gravity, is just energy/matter warping spacetime, and we just follow that curvature in spacetime itself.
A particle is needed to transfer the force from something over a distance. Gravity isn't a force. It's you following spacetime's shape.
Think of it like a NASCAR racetrack.
If you don't watch a lot of NASCAR, you probably don't know that there's a specific speed(for each corner of the track) that you can enter the corner at with your steering wheel dead-straight, and come out the other side, without ever turning your steering wheel from dead straight.
You literally go around the corner without turning your steering wheel.
Spacetime is like a 3D version of that.
When you orbit around another object, you're actually traveling in a straight line......
(I'll look up a science video about that straight line for you when I get off work tonight)
While gravitons could exist, there's no reason to expect them to, and the theory of relativity works without them.
And BTW, the graviton was only thought up because when you put quantum mechanics and gravity together, you get absolute trash out of the math. A particle would allow QM to fix a lot of its problems.
That's not evidence of the particle existing.
In other words, the idea of a graviton isn't a theory, it's not even an hypothesis.
It's a made-up idea based on the fact that a particle would help their math. Not on any evidence at all.
The graviton is a hope, not science.
One Q. How do particles of a certain type i.e. mass oscillate to a different mass? Now that's witchcraft
Great video !
The stock footage sucks, and often doesn't have anything to do with the video...
Who cares really? how the hell will this help me get back to heaven? seriously, how did I get here
i stay away from robot voices now. im sure the info in here is good but im gonna look for a human talking about it. scared about when we cant tell the difference tbh
Snoopy at 3:30 🐶
I love this video!
But, “nucular”?? Why?? Just why?? 😭😭
Neutrino "oscillation"....how convenient. And that 2010 "confirmation experiment".....the audacity of the grift is stupefying! Nice video though.
Yeah I thought that sounded sus too.
Nuke-Lee-Us not Nuke-Yuh-Luss.
Where you find that content
seek and ye shall find.........😒
What you mean ?
@@InsaneCuriosity seek
/sēk/
verb
attempt to find (something).
"they came here to seek shelter from biting winter winds"
attempt or desire to obtain or achieve (something).
"the new regime sought his extradition"
ask for (something) from someone.
"he sought help from the police"
@@InsaneCuriosity ye1
/yē/
pronoun
ARCHAIC•DIALECT
plural form of thou1.
"gather ye rosebuds, while ye may"
@@InsaneCuriosity shall
/SHal/

verb
1.
(in the first person) expressing the future tense.
"this time next week I shall be in Scotland"
2.
expressing a strong assertion or intention.
"they shall succeed"
very poor word flow. No reason to pause between words mid-sentence. Seems like you aren't reading the script a few times before recording. Speed it up.
Lmfao. This is AI voice, not a real person hahahaha
😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@Phuong_Nguyen_literally bro is shaking his fist at a cloud 💀
@@nopenope4402 At first I thought it might be an AI voice reading the script but after listening to more of the video I think you're right. The guy reading the script just has an unusual rhythm or cadence when speaking and taking quick breaths between sentences. Maybe not all the time, but at least while reading out loud, which in this context is what counts.
⚛️✌️
d(𝑎 × 10ⁿ)/dn
Letting 6 ≤ 𝑛