Teddy did it because he knew he easily could’ve won a 3rd term, but decided to respect the office and give it to Taft. Then when he returned from an African hunting expedition 2 years later he was pissed about how Taft was tarnishing his progressive, trustbusting legacy(even though Taft did more trustbusting than Roosevelt). So he ran again and the only thing he accomplished was handing the presidency to Woodrow Wilson, one of our worst presidents ever. FDR on the other hand was extremely popular due to perceived effects of the new deal(in reality, the breakout of WW2 was what caused the economy to rebound near the end of his 2nd term). And since he was seen as a strong leader there weren’t many good candidates willing to go against him. with the breakout of the war it made sense to keep the same president even if I don’t like the fact that he even ran for a 3rd term
Actually several presidents went for 3rd terms before fdr, Ulysses Grant ran briefly in 1876, and ran a full reelection campaign for 1880, Cleveland was technically in the running in 1896 before losing the nomination, Theodore Roosevelt ran for a 3rd term in 1912, followed by wilson running for a 3rd in 1920
Theodore Roosevelt only ran 2 times. 1904 and 1912. He became president as a vp because of an assassination of the president, and that doesn't count as a full first term.
Theodore Roosevelt only ran for president 2x. In 1900 he ran as vp and became president from assassination and that even with modern laws isn't considered a full term. This means his run in 1904 and 1912 is only running 2x.
The wording is a little bad but you knew what he was trying to say. He was saying that no one before FDR had actually successfully *reached* beyond a second term, not the alternative: that no one attempted to
Actually an interesting fact omitted from the end is that despite the 22nd amendment being ratified in 1951, the incumbent president at the time of its ratification, Harry Truman, was specifically exempt from its provisions. Because of this, Truman tried to run for reelection in 1952, which would have otherwise been prohibited as Truman had served his own full term as President and over 2 years of FDR’s fourth term. However, he dropped out of the race after poor performances in the Democratic primaries and with polls showing him to be personally unpopular. The winner of the 1952 election, Dwight D. Eisenhower, thus became the first president to be subjected to term limits.
I’m in Australia. You were very wise in limiting the office to two terms. Basically it meant that no matter how bad a president was, he couldn’t hoodwink the voters for too long. That restriction has proven to be the correct.
🤦 once again the internet has proven to me the severe lack in the quality of education present today so I guess I am forced to explain it to you. The reason the supreme court doesn’t have term limits is because they are meant to be separate from the political whims of the time. And take objective views of problems absent from the current political climate, a Supreme Court justice appointed 30 years ago is going to be way more objective about current political trends and norms than otherwise. And you can’t just pass a law to make this happen the Supreme Court is constitutionally protected and will require a amendment which requires 75 percent approval by the congress and senate as well as a 75 percent approval by popular vote. The founders did this for a very important reason and it would be wise to try understand why. Just because we are 250 years in the future doesn’t mean we are right and we should change old rules and law’s just because we need to look at why they were a thing in the first place and if it still applies now that is a problem with progressiveness but that is beside the point.
2 terms for senators and 4 terms for representatives and the supreme court justices should be limited to 20 years. And if they support anything that is contrary to the constitution they should be removed immediately. So we don't get justices or members of congress that pass any legislation that is contrary to the constitution and bill of rights. No more of this obamacare type bullshit or red flag laws crap.
Incorrect. FDR was not the first person to TRY for a third term; Ulysses S. Grant tried in 1876 and 1880 for what would have been his third term, had he won. (He didn't even get the Republican nomination either time.) FDR is just the first person to actually WIN a third term. Grover Cleveland, Theodore Roosevelt, and Woodrow Wilson also unsuccessfully attempted third terms. FDR was actually the FIFTH person to try for a third term. Also Harry Truman unsuccessfully tried for a third term in 1952, the last person who could try for one as the Constitutional amendment that made two terms an actual limit rather than merely a tradition exempted the person that was president when it passed, in 1951.
I mean I know about FDR being the only president who have been elected for four terms, put for his opponent to have been a Democrat up until 1 year before the election and turn Republican is honestly way more unexpected I think. Of course people forget that Trump who is hardcore right-wing now actually used to be very progressive and on the left.
The Republican party of today is what the Democrat party was in 2008 lol Opposite sides of topics and policy decisions compared to Democrats, but far from the ideal image of conservatism that the party was known for. The same thing applies to Democrats far from the ideal image of liberalism that the party was known for.
Ulysses Grant, Grover Cleveland, Teddy Roosevelt, and Woodrow Wilson tried for third bites before 1940 one of them managed to win although he had previously been president for one term. Teddy Roosevelt almost won meanwhile, Ulysses grant and Woodrow Wilson lost their nominations.
The guy has become president for a second time and is now focused on leaving his legacy. He said himself that he could be chilling while playing golf but decided to run for president. In 2028 he is going to still play a role in politics but from the sidelines.
He was a strong leader, but his New Deal actually caused permanent damage to the country by making the federal government the massive inefficient and overbearing machine that it is now. Many of The “alphabet soup” (3 letter) agencies of the federal government were started under him.
They never should’ve added that there’s no reason for it if you have a good president keep them in office if you have a bad president there’s this thing called impeachment and you kick them out of office or just don’t vote them back into office but allow them to run for how many times they want if people don’t want them they won’t get elected if people want them then they get elected That’s how it should’ve been not going to making third terms illegal I find it entirely stupid
@Luke-t7k you are interfering with the independence of the of the judicial branch. I am not in favor of plans people have to pack the court or other schemes.👨⚖ expect retirements to be coming up next year.
@@Luke-t7k of course you have the pro of there not being octogenarians on the court, but those people can retire anyways if they are really to old to be on the court and it’s not the age that is the problem, but their mental state and overall health. Why you don’t want term limits for the courts is because you want the court to be as objective as possible and free from Democratic influence. In 2016, Trump ran on appointing pro-life judges to the courts to sway the evangelicals that were skeptical of his VERY non-conservative lifestyle. In every election, there is at least some thought of the court’s makeup. If SCOTUS had term limits, then the courts would have even more power and be more biased.
@@Luke-t7k of course you have the pro of there not being octogenarians on the court, but those people can retire anyways if they are really to old to be on the court and it’s not the age that is the problem, but their mental state and overall health. Why you don’t want term limits for the courts is because you want the court to be as objective as possible and free from Democratic influence. In 2016, Trump ran on appointing pro-life judges to the courts to sway the evangelicals that were skeptical of his VERY non-conservative lifestyle. In every election, there is at least some thought of the court’s makeup. If SCOTUS had term limits, then the courts would have even more power and be more biased.
Really? Obama was President for for all of Trumps first term? Huh. No wonder everyone was rich, food was nearly free, and they paid you to fill up your car.
There was nothing unconstitutional with FDR running for the high office as many times as he wanted to. It should not be presented as him doing anything wrong.
Funny thing is the 22nd amendment wasn't really all that needed in the decades following FDR. Up until Reagan, no president even managed to serve 2 full terms. Reagan was the first since FDR who could have ran for a third term and won easily but he probably wouldn't given how bad his health was (heck, that was the reason Reagan never went through on his vow to repeal the 22nd amendment) That really leaves only two presidents since FDR who were young and relatively popular enough to have won a third term: Clinton and Obama (Bush would have gotten trounced worse than McCain). Clinton was actually more popular by the end of his second term than when he started although the Lewinsky scandal might have caused Democrats to pressure him not to run (Al Gore tried as much as possible to distance himself from Clinton). Obama wasn't as popular but if Hillary only lost by 70,000 votes in 3 deciding states despite being a weaker candidate in every regard he probably would have scraped to a 3rd term in 2016 just because of who his opponent would have been (heck, he probably would have won a 4th term just because of how in 2020, COVID caused every world leader to see a big spike in their approval ratings, the only 2 exceptions being Trump and Brazil's Bolsanaro).
This clip tells us he was a master propagandist. He also gave away half the free Western world to Stalin at the end of WWII. FDR is my least favorite president of all.
@@dbjkatz The economy was already in the process of healing from the depression at the onset of the war in 1939. Did a war economy help America recover? Of course, but plenty of work was done before hand to resurrect the economy, most of which was at the hand of FDR and the New Deal Democrats.
@@MegaByte8904please source your reference for such a stupid comment. The economists I have read typically state that FDR was responsible for taking a local recession and turning it into a global depression and extended it for over a decade due to bad policies. Let’s be frank FDR was one of the worst presidents this country has ever had up until Obama and Biden
@johnlacey3857 impossible. He can not. Only thru the house and senate can anything be done, and it would then have to be ratified. Stop jumping without knowing actually how the process works.
Teddy Roosevelt went for a 3rd bite, but lost.
Teddy did it because he knew he easily could’ve won a 3rd term, but decided to respect the office and give it to Taft. Then when he returned from an African hunting expedition 2 years later he was pissed about how Taft was tarnishing his progressive, trustbusting legacy(even though Taft did more trustbusting than Roosevelt). So he ran again and the only thing he accomplished was handing the presidency to Woodrow Wilson, one of our worst presidents ever.
FDR on the other hand was extremely popular due to perceived effects of the new deal(in reality, the breakout of WW2 was what caused the economy to rebound near the end of his 2nd term). And since he was seen as a strong leader there weren’t many good candidates willing to go against him. with the breakout of the war it made sense to keep the same president even if I don’t like the fact that he even ran for a 3rd term
@@gagejernigan5277 He didn't want to but the Dems pushed him to.
@@cax1175 no other dems wanted to run due to his popularity but he evidently did cause he ran for a 4th term after that
Teddy's 1912 campaign was his second time running for president at the top of the ticket. In 1900, he was the Vice Presidential nominee.
@ this would apply if McKinley had been killed later but since Roosevelt took office so soon after the election it counts as a term.
Actually several presidents went for 3rd terms before fdr, Ulysses Grant ran briefly in 1876, and ran a full reelection campaign for 1880, Cleveland was technically in the running in 1896 before losing the nomination, Theodore Roosevelt ran for a 3rd term in 1912, followed by wilson running for a 3rd in 1920
How ironic. Those must all have been Dems. Trump only just reached “three times in a row nominee” status 😂
@@SoundClaw09USG and Teddy were not Democrats. Also, Trump has ran 4 times.
Theodore Roosevelt only ran 2 times. 1904 and 1912. He became president as a vp because of an assassination of the president, and that doesn't count as a full first term.
@@SoundClaw09the only one that’s a dem was Cleveland
@@SoundClaw09whats ironic and how is that in any way related
Teddy Roosevelt, US Grant, and Woodrow Wilson had all tried to get a third term.
Wilson hasn't. He wanted to but was crippled.
Theodore Roosevelt only ran for president 2x. In 1900 he ran as vp and became president from assassination and that even with modern laws isn't considered a full term. This means his run in 1904 and 1912 is only running 2x.
Truman also tried in 1952, but lost an early primary and dropped out
Wilson's "attempt" can hardly count because he could barely function after the stroke he had during his 2nd term
It's hard to respect a documentary clip about history when the very first sentence is so very incorrect.
The wording is a little bad but you knew what he was trying to say. He was saying that no one before FDR had actually successfully *reached* beyond a second term, not the alternative: that no one attempted to
@lewisschreffler Bro tried to give an explanation but ended the sentence with something so wrong
@@NewDealChief nope. I ended it correctly
Filthy lying Repuke video.
@lewisschreffler "No one before FDR had actually successfully reached a second term" 😂😂😂😂 Can't see your mistake aye
Actually an interesting fact omitted from the end is that despite the 22nd amendment being ratified in 1951, the incumbent president at the time of its ratification, Harry Truman, was specifically exempt from its provisions. Because of this, Truman tried to run for reelection in 1952, which would have otherwise been prohibited as Truman had served his own full term as President and over 2 years of FDR’s fourth term. However, he dropped out of the race after poor performances in the Democratic primaries and with polls showing him to be personally unpopular. The winner of the 1952 election, Dwight D. Eisenhower, thus became the first president to be subjected to term limits.
Wilkie became friends with FDR during his third term.
U. S. Grant tried for a third but was not nominated.
There's a plaque honoring Willkie on 40th Street on the south wall of New York Public Library's plaza.
Gonna take a wild guess and assume this video is reccomended to me as a bad omen 🤣
Second time I'm seeing a video about this...
I’m in Australia. You were very wise in limiting the office to two terms. Basically it meant that no matter how bad a president was, he couldn’t hoodwink the voters for too long. That restriction has proven to be the correct.
Yeah, his death spared us from his completing his Socialist agenda of a Second Bill of Rights.
@@rogergroover4633thank god🙏. FDR was great and all, but not on policy.
Can you do one on the 1924 Election. Robert Lafollette and Wisconsin represent.
Thank you for the idea.
Thank you!
That amendment was a huge mistake.
I think it’s anti-democratic not to allow the voters to elect someone for as many terms as they want.
TERM LIMITS FOR THE SUPREME COURT ALSO
Absolutely!
🤦 once again the internet has proven to me the severe lack in the quality of education present today so I guess I am forced to explain it to you. The reason the supreme court doesn’t have term limits is because they are meant to be separate from the political whims of the time. And take objective views of problems absent from the current political climate, a Supreme Court justice appointed 30 years ago is going to be way more objective about current political trends and norms than otherwise. And you can’t just pass a law to make this happen the Supreme Court is constitutionally protected and will require a amendment which requires 75 percent approval by the congress and senate as well as a 75 percent approval by popular vote. The founders did this for a very important reason and it would be wise to try understand why. Just because we are 250 years in the future doesn’t mean we are right and we should change old rules and law’s just because we need to look at why they were a thing in the first place and if it still applies now that is a problem with progressiveness but that is beside the point.
Agree
2 terms for senators and 4 terms for representatives and the supreme court justices should be limited to 20 years. And if they support anything that is contrary to the constitution they should be removed immediately. So we don't get justices or members of congress that pass any legislation that is contrary to the constitution and bill of rights. No more of this obamacare type bullshit or red flag laws crap.
Why, just because it is controlled by conservatives?
Incorrect. FDR was not the first person to TRY for a third term; Ulysses S. Grant tried in 1876 and 1880 for what would have been his third term, had he won. (He didn't even get the Republican nomination either time.) FDR is just the first person to actually WIN a third term.
Grover Cleveland, Theodore Roosevelt, and Woodrow Wilson also unsuccessfully attempted third terms. FDR was actually the FIFTH person to try for a third term.
Also Harry Truman unsuccessfully tried for a third term in 1952, the last person who could try for one as the Constitutional amendment that made two terms an actual limit rather than merely a tradition exempted the person that was president when it passed, in 1951.
I mean I know about FDR being the only president who have been elected for four terms, put for his opponent to have been a Democrat up until 1 year before the election and turn Republican is honestly way more unexpected I think. Of course people forget that Trump who is hardcore right-wing now actually used to be very progressive and on the left.
I haven't forgotten. And I wouldn't call him on the right.
The Republican party of today is what the Democrat party was in 2008 lol
Opposite sides of topics and policy decisions compared to Democrats, but far from the ideal image of conservatism that the party was known for.
The same thing applies to Democrats far from the ideal image of liberalism that the party was known for.
Both the Left and Right are wildly different parties than they were 25-30 years ago. Trump really hasn't changed that much, the parties have.
I would not an obscure executive as commander in chief during the largest war in history, especially against Japan.
Ulysses Grant, Grover Cleveland, Teddy Roosevelt, and Woodrow Wilson tried for third bites before 1940 one of them managed to win although he had previously been president for one term. Teddy Roosevelt almost won meanwhile, Ulysses grant and Woodrow Wilson lost their nominations.
I thought that picture of Wendell Wilkie was a black & white image of Dave McCormick
They should add that members of the House only 2 terms and the Senate 1 term.
Wilson wife had him run. She was actually doing all his work after his stroke.
That would be disastrous.
Too restrictive.
Barry Soetoro figured out the way around the 25th !
Time to see if this amendment actually holds up in 2028 or if its just words on a silly piece of paper
You need to have a little bit more faith.
The guy has become president for a second time and is now focused on leaving his legacy.
He said himself that he could be chilling while playing golf but decided to run for president.
In 2028 he is going to still play a role in politics but from the sidelines.
I never get the idea on two term law. Other countries can do it, so we can.
To be fair, he was an awesome president.
He was a strong leader, but his New Deal actually caused permanent damage to the country by making the federal government the massive inefficient and overbearing machine that it is now. Many of The “alphabet soup” (3 letter) agencies of the federal government were started under him.
@@RicardoSanchez-es5wlthe alphabet soup problem became a problem because of bush. I’m not even blaming bush. He was responding to extreme conditions.
Now they need to pass legislation to limit congress to two terms 😢
Interedting thing about FDR's fourth term, he did not want to run for his fourth term. But he caved in to his wife and party.
They never should’ve added that there’s no reason for it if you have a good president keep them in office if you have a bad president there’s this thing called impeachment and you kick them out of office or just don’t vote them back into office but allow them to run for how many times they want if people don’t want them they won’t get elected if people want them then they get elected That’s how it should’ve been not going to making third terms illegal I find it entirely stupid
Chicago Democrats... vote early, vote often.
Obama and Hillary were Cook County Democrats.
If FDR were immortal he'd still be president to this day and that'd be fine by me 😂
Grant tried for a third term, but list to a new up-n-coming new candidate.
They need to limit Congress and senate to 2 terms as well
No just make it 1 election and let them run 8 consecutive after that they are done
@MultiTurbospeed
2 4 year terms, sorry I didn't clarify.....
I think Supreme Court justices should have term limits as well - 10 years seem appropriate.
Bad idea.
@@WALTERBROADDUS Would you please care to elaborate why you think term limit is a singularly bad idea, as opposed to having pros and cons?
@Luke-t7k you are interfering with the independence of the of the judicial branch. I am not in favor of plans people have to pack the court or other schemes.👨⚖ expect retirements to be coming up next year.
@@Luke-t7k of course you have the pro of there not being octogenarians on the court, but those people can retire anyways if they are really to old to be on the court and it’s not the age that is the problem, but their mental state and overall health. Why you don’t want term limits for the courts is because you want the court to be as objective as possible and free from Democratic influence. In 2016, Trump ran on appointing pro-life judges to the courts to sway the evangelicals that were skeptical of his VERY non-conservative lifestyle. In every election, there is at least some thought of the court’s makeup. If SCOTUS had term limits, then the courts would have even more power and be more biased.
@@Luke-t7k of course you have the pro of there not being octogenarians on the court, but those people can retire anyways if they are really to old to be on the court and it’s not the age that is the problem, but their mental state and overall health. Why you don’t want term limits for the courts is because you want the court to be as objective as possible and free from Democratic influence. In 2016, Trump ran on appointing pro-life judges to the courts to sway the evangelicals that were skeptical of his VERY non-conservative lifestyle. In every election, there is at least some thought of the court’s makeup. If SCOTUS had term limits, then the courts would have even more power and be more biased.
Obama just got booted from his 4th term
Really? Obama was President for for all of Trumps first term? Huh. No wonder everyone was rich, food was nearly free, and they paid you to fill up your car.
Nobama.
😂🤣😂
OBOMBYA
I know Teddy Roosevelt took a crack at a third term in 1912
Trump just reached the third bite of the Apple (2020 was stolen).
Hey, did you know: Jesus loves you!
He hang on to the presidency like a Pope
But now they want to act like they don’t have operatives. In 2024 😂
Lincoln used similar tactics
Rent a mob?
Fun fact: the only presidents to be elected three times are Roosevelt and Trump.
Trump only one twice.
@@MrRabbit772 Have you found your missing 10 million votes yet?
We need an amendment limiting all political offices to 2 terms!
Imagine if that did happen and corruption and nothing getting done only got worse
@@opiterturpilinus2248 And you think nothing getting 'done' in the senate or house would be a bad thing!?
@ yes for nothing is done regardless
How about voters just do what voters are supposed to do?
@@WALTERBROADDUS How about we get rid of career politicians and impose term limits!?
Another reason to praise FDR
America was a 1 party state for 20 years, and it may have caused a prolongation of the Great Depression
It took a World War and adding women to the workforce to get out of it. The women have not left the workforce.
There was nothing unconstitutional with FDR running for the high office as many times as he wanted to. It should not be presented as him doing anything wrong.
No one said anything about it being unconstitutional.
😮 ? ? ? INFO ? 😮
We need another FDR. Time for a modern New Deal for todays working class.
Free USa , from Sea to shining Sea 🇺🇸
Any chance we can get an in depth look at why FDR allowed for the 1939 Hitler rally at Madison Square Garden?
@@brianfranczak9517 since Madison square garden isn't Federal property... It's rather difficult for a president to stop any specific event there.
@dbjkatz But since we have evidence he admired Hitler, it wasn't exactly discouraged either.
Well, they were limited to ten years. So, two terms and then maybe they could get bumped up from VP for two years, theoretically.
May he Rest In Peace.
Funny thing is the 22nd amendment wasn't really all that needed in the decades following FDR. Up until Reagan, no president even managed to serve 2 full terms. Reagan was the first since FDR who could have ran for a third term and won easily but he probably wouldn't given how bad his health was (heck, that was the reason Reagan never went through on his vow to repeal the 22nd amendment)
That really leaves only two presidents since FDR who were young and relatively popular enough to have won a third term: Clinton and Obama (Bush would have gotten trounced worse than McCain). Clinton was actually more popular by the end of his second term than when he started although the Lewinsky scandal might have caused Democrats to pressure him not to run (Al Gore tried as much as possible to distance himself from Clinton). Obama wasn't as popular but if Hillary only lost by 70,000 votes in 3 deciding states despite being a weaker candidate in every regard he probably would have scraped to a 3rd term in 2016 just because of who his opponent would have been (heck, he probably would have won a 4th term just because of how in 2020, COVID caused every world leader to see a big spike in their approval ratings, the only 2 exceptions being Trump and Brazil's Bolsanaro).
Eisenhower served twice.
I swear you children have bad history teachers.👨🏽💻
Besides FDR, DJT is the only President who have won 3 terms 🎉
So correct.
Cleveland won the popular vote in three elections
@ This Republic doesn’t elect President with popular votes
Senile Joe embarrassed him 😂
FDR frankly shouldn't even remotely be remembered as fondly as he is.
This clip tells us he was a master propagandist. He also gave away half the free Western world to Stalin at the end of WWII. FDR is my least favorite president of all.
Perhaps... But the main reasons are that WW2 jolted the US economy out of the Great Depression AND FDR died shortly before WW2 ended.
`FDR was almost as bad as YT censoring.
@@dbjkatz The economy was already in the process of healing from the depression at the onset of the war in 1939. Did a war economy help America recover? Of course, but plenty of work was done before hand to resurrect the economy, most of which was at the hand of FDR and the New Deal Democrats.
@@MegaByte8904please source your reference for such a stupid comment. The economists I have read typically state that FDR was responsible for taking a local recession and turning it into a global depression and extended it for over a decade due to bad policies. Let’s be frank FDR was one of the worst presidents this country has ever had up until Obama and Biden
If trump was younger he'd eliminate the amendment.
That’s Un-American he wouldn’t
@seneca55 lol
What you mean if younger, bro if hes alive in 2028 he's just gonna run again
@@seneca55have you been under a rock the last 8 years?
@randomhater5541 but a fascist would.
What a horrible man, and we voted him in not once or twice but four times!
how so bud?
@ He vastly expanded government control in the Economy.
The economy ripped itself apart in the 1920s
Lmao cope
@@WrongAndHomehe extended the Great Depression for over a decade due to his bad policy
So basically a Hillary vs Trump situation. This makes me dislike FDR significantly
Trump will attempt to remove this amendment.
We can hope he is successful
Nonsense. 3/4 of the state legislatures will not pass such an Amendment. An even more obvious reason is that Trump will be 82 years old in 2028.
@johnlacey3857 impossible. He can not.
Only thru the house and senate can anything be done, and it would then have to be ratified.
Stop jumping without knowing actually how the process works.
Have any basis for that claim? I haven't heard anything about this subject from him before.
@@tdw5933That’s Un-American, Big Daddy D-Trump wouldn’t
Need an amendment for no convicted felons, after tomorrow 🇺🇸💙
@@jasonwardy8192 why?,because of lawfare by the communists??
Err demmycraps
@@jasonwardy8192 that would block ou 1/3 of all the politicians
Eugene V. Debs ran as a Socialist in 1920 ... from prison
So no Trump 2028?
The key word in this ratification is "consecutive " so legally Trump could now serve 8 more years😊😊😊😊😊😊
One reason Roosevelt is our most overrated president imo
I think Reagan moreso, easily.
Most ridiculous post I’ve seen in days…you should thank men like FDR.
@@jasonwardy8192 He's a Trump supporter. What do you expect.
@@cax1175 not a big Reagan fan either tbh
@@jasonwardy8192 FDR extended the reach of the federal government way too far
They had to make Roosevelt disabled to make sure he wouldn't get too powerful.
So far, the most ridiculous comment of the day.
He was disabled before he was governor of New York
@geoffroi-le-Hook Exactly. He came down with polio.
I think you guys missed the joke.
😂😂😂 WELCOME TO THE REPUBLIC OF THE UNITED STATES 😂😂😂
Cmon trumpy for a third bite and beyond..!!!
FDRs third and fourth terms were disastrous
VD..NOT POLIO
TRUMP 2028!
Not a chance