Hi Simeon yes you are correct i made a mistake dealing players 3rd card before seeing bankers 2 cards. That is an error. Every time i think I got it as a dealer i don't lol.... As a player I'm great as a dealer getting better...
I know that you cannot share too much of your bet sizing strategy for non-paying individuals, but it does seem like a variation of the martingale strategy except that at a certain point you stop increasing your bet even if you have not won 1 out of 3 or 4 hands. I wonder though because the Martingale strategy has been proven to be a losing strategy.
Martingale has different bet sizes and ways. It's basically been given a bad rep because people have no clue what is the correct bet sizing after losses. I personally do not pay attention to the term martingale but yes i use a higher bet after losses. I use the term laddering up and down. The public gamblers continue to say martingale is a proven failure. The truth is the individuals are proven to be failing based on their bet issues.
I'm not sure i follow you here? Yes the player or banker can drop and win 3 to 4 times in a row. Anytime it wins 3 in a row and drops you are switching to playing the winning side.
on the 2nd hand, you pull a 6 for the player to make 9, banker has A K, you still need to draw a third card for Banker. Why did you stop and not pull another card for Banker? The rule states that you need to draw another card for Banker since total is only 1.
Yes what i was doing wrong was dealing players 3rd card before seeing Bankers 2. That is wrong of me. I'm getting better at this dealing stuff. Thanks for watching and your help. Its much easier just being a player betting than it is dealing
Hey Jimmy, I like your videos, you should go back to the simulator, they are easier to understand. What happened to the wait till four in a row before you start betting the winner. I used your strategy for the first time recently, and I had great wins. My only problem is, I didn’t say a cut off, and stayed too long. Now I know I need to set a goal and leave when that is reached.
eventually i will get better at dealing it is very tricky learning the banker side. I'm getting close lol. I see a few mistakes i made here. Every video I usually make 1 or 2 mistakes which is better than the 10 i was making lol.... Thanks to a few dealers that watch me i see things a little better. It's amazing as a player how i never paid attention to the rules of banker. I always just paid attention to the digital screen did i win or lose that was about it. 90% of the game regarding how the cards are delt are easy. It's that 10% on banker that is tricky.
Good session, great information finally.
When a banker gets a natural 8 or 9 the round ends. No 3rd card for player. You gave player a 3rd card a few times. As an FYI
Hi Simeon yes you are correct i made a mistake dealing players 3rd card before seeing bankers 2 cards. That is an error. Every time i think I got it as a dealer i don't lol.... As a player I'm great as a dealer getting better...
I know that you cannot share too much of your bet sizing strategy for non-paying individuals, but it does seem like a variation of the martingale strategy except that at a certain point you stop increasing your bet even if you have not won 1 out of 3 or 4 hands. I wonder though because the Martingale strategy has been proven to be a losing strategy.
Martingale has different bet sizes and ways. It's basically been given a bad rep because people have no clue what is the correct bet sizing after losses. I personally do not pay attention to the term martingale but yes i use a higher bet after losses. I use the term laddering up and down. The public gamblers continue to say martingale is a proven failure. The truth is the individuals are proven to be failing based on their bet issues.
hello
Sometimes it is repeated four or five times as three players and three bunkers. Please explain about this
I'm not sure i follow you here? Yes the player or banker can drop and win 3 to 4 times in a row. Anytime it wins 3 in a row and drops you are switching to playing the winning side.
on the 2nd hand, you pull a 6 for the player to make 9, banker has A K, you still need to draw a third card for Banker. Why did you stop and not pull another card for Banker? The rule states that you need to draw another card for Banker since total is only 1.
Yes what i was doing wrong was dealing players 3rd card before seeing Bankers 2. That is wrong of me. I'm getting better at this dealing stuff. Thanks for watching and your help. Its much easier just being a player betting than it is dealing
When I play, I wait about three-five losses in a row, then I start playing. Many times when I start a session, I end up losing multiple hands in a row
Hey Jimmy, I like your videos, you should go back to the simulator, they are easier to understand. What happened to the wait till four in a row before you start betting the winner. I used your strategy for the first time recently, and I had great wins. My only problem is, I didn’t say a cut off, and stayed too long. Now I know I need to set a goal and leave when that is reached.
eventually i will get better at dealing it is very tricky learning the banker side. I'm getting close lol. I see a few mistakes i made here. Every video I usually make 1 or 2 mistakes which is better than the 10 i was making lol.... Thanks to a few dealers that watch me i see things a little better. It's amazing as a player how i never paid attention to the rules of banker. I always just paid attention to the digital screen did i win or lose that was about it. 90% of the game regarding how the cards are delt are easy. It's that 10% on banker that is tricky.
No Shuffling Required 🎉
lol thanks
You have the wrong banker card number 4, it is not a player