You guys are seriously awesome. I've watched every video up to this one so far, and I have to say that it's insanely informative. Great job on all this!
Joseph Swanner Thank you! We appreciate any feedback you have - you can email us directly at support at mruniversity dot com or leave notes at feedback.mruniversity.com. We are trying a bunch of different stuff out so we love to hear feedback and what people like or don't like.
This channel is brilliant! The videos explain economic concepts so lucidly and it is just so comfortable to watch. You are helping a lot of students and that is a great service to the society. The negative externalities are going down by your positive effort!!
PLEASE GUYS SUBSCRIBE TO "SMAHK ACADEMY" CHANNEL Our Aim is to Provide Free Range Education to Anyone Around The World, In All Academic Aspects as SCIENCE & ENGINEERING,COMPUTING,ARTS & HUMANITIES,ECONOMICS & FINANCE; Through Multi Language System And Harmonized Learning Process..... SUBSCRIBE TO JOIN OUR COMMUNITY. th-cam.com/video/enLIEASmCAw/w-d-xo.html
Wow I spend 30 minutes trying to understand my textbook about externalities and I couldn’t get it but your explanation was just amazing, now I understand everything, you got a new subscriber I’m looking forwards to more of your videos. Thanks!
PLEASE GUYS SUBSCRIBE TO "SMAHK ACADEMY" CHANNEL Our Aim is to Provide Free Range Education to Anyone Around The World, In All Academic Aspects as SCIENCE & ENGINEERING,COMPUTING,ARTS & HUMANITIES,ECONOMICS & FINANCE; Through Multi Language System And Harmonized Learning Process..... SUBSCRIBE TO JOIN OUR COMMUNITY. th-cam.com/video/enLIEASmCAw/w-d-xo.html
I also love your channel and use it regularly for my classes here in Auckland New Zealand. However this vid (intro to Exteralities) is confusing. Our textbook obeys a convention that negative externalities of consumption reduce social benefits (MB shifts left to MSB), rather than shifting the MC curve left to MSC consistent with your wording of "external cost" AS far as I can see the convention is useful and otherwise universal. Am I missing something. Owen Sharpe
PLEASE GUYS SUBSCRIBE TO "SMAHK ACADEMY" CHANNEL Our Aim is to Provide Free Range Education to Anyone Around The World, In All Academic Aspects as SCIENCE & ENGINEERING,COMPUTING,ARTS & HUMANITIES,ECONOMICS & FINANCE; Through Multi Language System And Harmonized Learning Process..... SUBSCRIBE TO JOIN OUR COMMUNITY. th-cam.com/video/enLIEASmCAw/w-d-xo.html
Really relevant now also in case of Covid-19 mutating again and again and becoming more dangerous, its has become more resistant...Awesome explanation, surprisingly 5 years back...
The ideal solution IMO is using money from the Pigouvian tax for compensating external costs. An example would be a CO2 tax that is used for planting trees.
Is Private Cost made up of costs incurred producers and/or consumers or just costs incurred by producers? There seems to be no consensus in literature over this matter.
Thanks for this great video a lot !!!! The subtitles in video is blocking some part of the graph. So please adjust the subtitle such that we can see and understand the graph more clearly.
In the case of farmers giving antibiotics to live stock it is negative externality of production - that I understand. But when people overuse antibiotics, why don't we treat it as negative externality of consumption with the private benefit higher than the social benefit?
PLEASE GUYS SUBSCRIBE TO "SMAHK ACADEMY" CHANNEL Our Aim is to Provide Free Range Education to Anyone Around The World, In All Academic Aspects as SCIENCE & ENGINEERING,COMPUTING,ARTS & HUMANITIES,ECONOMICS & FINANCE; Through Multi Language System And Harmonized Learning Process..... SUBSCRIBE TO JOIN OUR COMMUNITY. th-cam.com/video/enLIEASmCAw/w-d-xo.html
Isn't there another way to reduce antibiotics use? The way I see it, increasing their price is hurting poor people, because people who are not poor will always be able to afford the medicine. Rich people don't want to be sick, and they have the money, and there are no substitutes, so their demand curve is pretty inelastic. Poor people however, have an elastic curve, not because of substitutes but because they simply cannot afford it. I can't think of a solution, but it still seems unfair to me.
The only ethical way would be to price vaccines based on the consumers income, but the same can be said for any good or service if you're taking equity into account. Hope that makes sense
Its completely fair. It's a good. Poor people have the same opportunity to buy them, they just can't afford it. Same as a huge house, or nice car. The opportunity is the same, the market is fair.
because these economic theories are fascist... and i do not use that word lightly. they are privatizing the profit and socializing the cost. the lure of efficiency is biting itself in the foot.
@@1001spencer sorry for necro'ing but to my eye it seems that instead of taxing the suppliers directly, the tax should just be applied to everyone. That way, the rich foot the bill (because they can) and poor people pay less - the money collected by the state should then be redirected towards research on the field, and a maximum yearly supply of antibiotics should be instated (obviously being able to be broken if needs be, but with state authorization). That way there are less antibiotics on the market, the use of them is compensated by government-funded research, and poor people can still afford them.
You are talking about a negative production externality when the example should be about a negative consumption externality. A negative production externality will be corporations imposing a cost on society, while a negative consumption externality is about individuals overconsuming a good ( like your example ).
antibiotics overused vs prisoners overload. 1787 British hired sea captain to ship convicted felons...,Government would pay the captain only for prisoners who arrived alive.
You guys are seriously awesome. I've watched every video up to this one so far, and I have to say that it's insanely informative. Great job on all this!
Joseph Swanner Thank you! We appreciate any feedback you have - you can email us directly at support at mruniversity dot com or leave notes at feedback.mruniversity.com. We are trying a bunch of different stuff out so we love to hear feedback and what people like or don't like.
Who is watching this during Covid 19? so real like today situation
I wonder instead of forcing people to stay home maybe we can use a pigovian tax so that only the most important outings are taken?
That was clear and concise... have been trying to understand this concept for a week now. Thank you!
This channel is brilliant! The videos explain economic concepts so lucidly and it is just so comfortable to watch. You are helping a lot of students and that is a great service to the society. The negative externalities are going down by your positive effort!!
Thank you Akshay!
-Roman
PLEASE GUYS SUBSCRIBE TO "SMAHK ACADEMY" CHANNEL
Our Aim is to Provide Free Range Education to Anyone Around The World, In All Academic Aspects as SCIENCE & ENGINEERING,COMPUTING,ARTS & HUMANITIES,ECONOMICS & FINANCE; Through Multi Language System And Harmonized Learning Process..... SUBSCRIBE TO JOIN OUR COMMUNITY.
th-cam.com/video/enLIEASmCAw/w-d-xo.html
Wow I spend 30 minutes trying to understand my textbook about externalities and I couldn’t get it but your explanation was just amazing, now I understand everything, you got a new subscriber I’m looking forwards to more of your videos. Thanks!
These videos are really well explained. I've watched heaps in preparation for a new job and enjoyed them all. Thanks so much for this content.
you guys are awesome!!!! thank you and pray that God will bless y'all :)
This channel does an awesome job of explaining economic concepts. Thank you so much for making learning easy and very insightful.
Pigouvian tax formula at 10:40. Thanks I'm subscribing. Great analogy.
PLEASE GUYS SUBSCRIBE TO "SMAHK ACADEMY" CHANNEL
Our Aim is to Provide Free Range Education to Anyone Around The World, In All Academic Aspects as SCIENCE & ENGINEERING,COMPUTING,ARTS & HUMANITIES,ECONOMICS & FINANCE; Through Multi Language System And Harmonized Learning Process..... SUBSCRIBE TO JOIN OUR COMMUNITY.
th-cam.com/video/enLIEASmCAw/w-d-xo.html
A fun drinking game: drink a shot every time he says "antibiotic(s)".
Am in class right now and this video made my research easy
I also love your channel and use it regularly for my classes here in Auckland New Zealand.
However this vid (intro to Exteralities) is confusing. Our textbook obeys a convention that negative externalities of consumption reduce social benefits (MB shifts left to MSB), rather than shifting the MC curve left to MSC consistent with your wording of "external cost"
AS far as I can see the convention is useful and otherwise universal. Am I missing something. Owen Sharpe
I promise that once I start earning, I would definitely contribute money for this channel :)
PLEASE GUYS SUBSCRIBE TO "SMAHK ACADEMY" CHANNEL
Our Aim is to Provide Free Range Education to Anyone Around The World, In All Academic Aspects as SCIENCE & ENGINEERING,COMPUTING,ARTS & HUMANITIES,ECONOMICS & FINANCE; Through Multi Language System And Harmonized Learning Process..... SUBSCRIBE TO JOIN OUR COMMUNITY.
th-cam.com/video/enLIEASmCAw/w-d-xo.html
Really relevant now also in case of Covid-19 mutating again and again and becoming more dangerous, its has become more resistant...Awesome explanation, surprisingly 5 years back...
You may include portuguese subtitles too. Thank you, amazing work ;)
The ideal solution IMO is using money from the Pigouvian tax for compensating external costs. An example would be a CO2 tax that is used for planting trees.
I
really need to comment!!!!!! It is so useful!!!
The Chinese guy who ate a sick bat last winter probably created the biggest externality in history.
This was a great explanation. Thank you for the information!
Is Private Cost made up of costs incurred producers and/or consumers or just costs incurred by producers? There seems to be no consensus in literature over this matter.
This video is absolutely Awesome!!!!!!!!!
can you give an example of external cost
exceptional explanation !
Thanks for this great video a lot !!!!
The subtitles in video is blocking some part of the graph. So please adjust the subtitle such that we can see and understand the graph more clearly.
clear explanation! thank you very much :)
In the case of farmers giving antibiotics to live stock it is negative externality of production - that I understand. But when people overuse antibiotics, why don't we treat it as negative externality of consumption with the private benefit higher than the social benefit?
I think I understand, but how does one put a number on the social cost?
this channel is very useful. thank u very much
You guys are the best! Thank you!
Obrigado por compartilhar conhecimento conosco.
Very nice video
awesome ...keep going. thanks a million
Thank you!
Best, Roman
PLEASE GUYS SUBSCRIBE TO "SMAHK ACADEMY" CHANNEL
Our Aim is to Provide Free Range Education to Anyone Around The World, In All Academic Aspects as SCIENCE & ENGINEERING,COMPUTING,ARTS & HUMANITIES,ECONOMICS & FINANCE; Through Multi Language System And Harmonized Learning Process..... SUBSCRIBE TO JOIN OUR COMMUNITY.
th-cam.com/video/enLIEASmCAw/w-d-xo.html
"antabuyotics"
😀
Isn't there another way to reduce antibiotics use? The way I see it, increasing their price is hurting poor people, because people who are not poor will always be able to afford the medicine. Rich people don't want to be sick, and they have the money, and there are no substitutes, so their demand curve is pretty inelastic. Poor people however, have an elastic curve, not because of substitutes but because they simply cannot afford it.
I can't think of a solution, but it still seems unfair to me.
The only ethical way would be to price vaccines based on the consumers income, but the same can be said for any good or service if you're taking equity into account. Hope that makes sense
Its completely fair. It's a good. Poor people have the same opportunity to buy them, they just can't afford it. Same as a huge house, or nice car. The opportunity is the same, the market is fair.
When government intervenes, the market is no longer fair.
because these economic theories are fascist... and i do not use that word lightly. they are privatizing the profit and socializing the cost. the lure of efficiency is biting itself in the foot.
@@1001spencer sorry for necro'ing but to my eye it seems that instead of taxing the suppliers directly, the tax should just be applied to everyone. That way, the rich foot the bill (because they can) and poor people pay less - the money collected by the state should then be redirected towards research on the field, and a maximum yearly supply of antibiotics should be instated (obviously being able to be broken if needs be, but with state authorization).
That way there are less antibiotics on the market, the use of them is compensated by government-funded research, and poor people can still afford them.
You are talking about a negative production externality when the example should be about a negative consumption externality. A negative production externality will be corporations imposing a cost on society, while a negative consumption externality is about individuals overconsuming a good ( like your example ).
6:08 / 12:14
THAAAAANK YOU SOOO MUCH
good shit
very helpful 🤩
I would skip the baceria example to make the video more direct...
MetraMan09 Thanks for the info. I didnt know that.
Thanks for the video... but the subject matter is just an iteration of the nirvana fallacy.
antibiotics overused vs prisoners overload.
1787 British hired sea captain to ship convicted felons...,Government would pay the captain only for prisoners who arrived alive.
Anyone suffering from the Essay of ECON10331?
wako kasabot haha
Ope ei antanu ÄLLÅÅÄÄÄ