Ocean class - Guide 324

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ต.ค. 2024
  • The Ocean class, first rate ships of the line of the French Navy, is today's subject.
    Read more about the the ships here:
    www.amazon.co....
    Want to support the channel? - / drachinifel
    Want a shirt/mug/hoodie - shop.spreadshi...
    Want a medal? - www.etsy.com/u...
    Want to talk about ships? / discord
    Want to get some books? www.amazon.co.uk/shop/drachinifel
    Drydock Episodes in podcast format - / user-21912004
    Music - / ncmepicmusic

ความคิดเห็น • 273

  • @Drachinifel
    @Drachinifel  ปีที่แล้ว +37

    Pinned post for Q&A :)

    • @bkjeong4302
      @bkjeong4302 ปีที่แล้ว

      If the Wilhemshaven raid had happened and been very successful, how would this have affected naval policy in the interwar years and into WWII?

    • @sandrocerutti8161
      @sandrocerutti8161 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I remeber that a long time ago, I saw a brief video of the Royal Navy scuttling a former French vessel, caputerd at Trafalgar, after France refused to repurchase it, I think in 1956... have you some memory of that?

    • @johnlavery3433
      @johnlavery3433 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I’ve heard from another history TH-camr, History Buffs that after the battle with the Spanish Armada there was a huge outbreak of disease among the English fleet, and Queen Elizabeth kept them in quarantine, not just to avoid spreading plague, but to help…let’s say minimise the number of people she had to pay. Is this true, and did any similar cases happen to the best of your knowledge?

    • @thehuscarl4835
      @thehuscarl4835 ปีที่แล้ว

      When a compartmentalized ship is prepared for battle, the crew closes all doors and hatches to help maintain watertight integrity. With everything buttoned up, how did they maintain airflow to keep the boilers running without compromising the integrity of the ship?

    • @John.B.Jenkins
      @John.B.Jenkins ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Q&A Drach... Where do babies come from?

  • @lerougeau2399
    @lerougeau2399 ปีที่แล้ว +126

    The odd names of the Etats de Bourgogne and the Commerce the Marseilles which are mouthfulls even in French is because they were funded through the Don des Vaisseaux (ship donation) program where cities, provinces, and even individuals could directly contribute to the construction of naval vessels in the last half of the 18th century which would then be named in their honor. Basically a Kickstarter for warships.
    I'm really looking forward to the reopening of the French naval museum in Paris which has been closed since 2017 for renovations and I believe has a number of high quality models of Sane's work.

  • @ThePlebicide
    @ThePlebicide ปีที่แล้ว +239

    I never even considered that there might be Photos of these ships

    • @mpetersen6
      @mpetersen6 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Well if they survived into the 1840s it would be likely.

    • @jonathancrosby1583
      @jonathancrosby1583 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Why photos just predate the civil war where the iron clads got there first taste of war so old sailing ships and photography over lapped for a few decades

    • @rodofiron100
      @rodofiron100 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      The last ship of the li e to go to the scrapper in England was after WWII.

    • @phaasch
      @phaasch ปีที่แล้ว +5

      That was originally French, too.
      HMS Implacable was offered back to the French in 1949, but they wouldn't take it either.
      That was a black day, but the ship was rotten, and the country broke.

    • @221b-l3t
      @221b-l3t ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Crimean war has many pictures of large tall ship fleets engaged in battle. Feels like time travel to see them. I wish they had perfected photography 50 years sooner. It had been aroubd for so long but the breakthrough to actually store the images for any length of time came just 20 years too late for the pre steam era in naval ships

  • @khaelamensha3624
    @khaelamensha3624 ปีที่แล้ว +143

    OK I am French so as we do not do anything like others, I wish to have double 5 minutes guides as one of them will be used to try to track changes of names of the ships 😂 À noté, your French pronunciation is good OK we may hear a bit of British accent but it is exotic and we are used to have British people on our soil (during both war and peace times 😂). so no need to apologize. For the video, great one as always!

    • @Eire_Aontaithe
      @Eire_Aontaithe ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Dauphin Royal and Téméraire were very recurring names in the french navy

    • @khaelamensha3624
      @khaelamensha3624 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@Eire_Aontaithe You are right, a little bit less for the former one since revolution but yes Téméraire is still on use for one of our nuclear attack sub.

    • @alganhar1
      @alganhar1 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@khaelamensha3624 More than one Royal Navy Ship of the Line or Battleship has worn the name Temeraire also, which is obviously the anglicized version. Of the ships that have carried the name (6 in all), 4 have been, or would have been ships of the Line or Battleships. The 1939 ship to be named Temeraire was supposed to be a Lion Class, so she was never completed, I am uncertain even if she were one of the two laid down. The other three were a 74 gun third rate, a 98 gun second rate, and the 1907 Bellerophon Class Dreadnaught.
      The name still is in use, though it is preserved as the name of a Royal Navy Shore Base. HMS Temeraire is in Plymouth and is home to the Director of Naval Physical Development, which is the department of the RN responsible not only for physical fitness in the RN but also encouraging sports excellence within the service.
      Whether it will be used as a ship name again is doubtful given the draw down of the number of Capital ships in the RN these days. Only the Nuclear submarines use the old Battleship names, and we only have ten of them if you include both the Attack Boats and the SSBN's (6 and 4 respectively).
      I guess the RN liked the name, so kept it. Cannot say I blame them, the translation as I understand it is Reckless.

    • @eshafto
      @eshafto ปีที่แล้ว

      I notice that many naval historians promote the idea that renaming a ship is bad luck. An obvious conspiracy theory suggests itself.

    • @JoshuaC923
      @JoshuaC923 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@alganhar1 a very nice name indeed

  • @SephirothRyu
    @SephirothRyu ปีที่แล้ว +91

    Wait, let me get this straight. The French building STANDARDIZED warships.

    • @FluffyFishy69
      @FluffyFishy69 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Standardised warships were a thing in the ancient world then again from about the 13th century in some places :)

    • @Balrog2005
      @Balrog2005 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Here we go again...yes the French were building standardized (no just the hull) warships in the dawn of the industrial revolution well before stupid memes...

    • @brunol-p_g8800
      @brunol-p_g8800 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yes, the French were building standardised warships well before the British or the Americans. If only you had a bit of curiosity you would educate yourself, instead of blindly following stupid memes, and you’d be surprised as how many things you thought right weren’t,

    • @SephirothRyu
      @SephirothRyu ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@brunol-p_g8800 It is a joke based on a certain other time period in France's naval history, dude. I have seen no memes about it.

    • @wierdalien1
      @wierdalien1 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@brunol-p_g8800uhhh no they weren't. But also the joke is about the pre-dreads. So please take your faux offence and don't let the door hit you on the way out.

  • @FluffyFishy69
    @FluffyFishy69 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    Please more 18th century ships, they are fantastic pieces of engineering that don't get nearly enough love that they deserve

  • @rogerwilco2
    @rogerwilco2 ปีที่แล้ว +215

    I am always a bit sad that if a ship survived very long, it was still scrapped instead of being a museum today.

    • @tomppeli.
      @tomppeli. ปีที่แล้ว +28

      Back in the day, preserving something we'd now call history didn't seem to be as much of a thing as it became later

    • @michaelpiatkowskijr1045
      @michaelpiatkowskijr1045 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      What about the museum ships that would be scrapped? USS Oregon.

    • @Eire_Aontaithe
      @Eire_Aontaithe ปีที่แล้ว +6

      And I always feel bad when a ship with less than 5 or 6 years of service is sunk. Sinking a brand new ship feels bad

    • @petethebastard
      @petethebastard ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Museum Ships still cost a lot of coin to maintain....

    • @blaze1148
      @blaze1148 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.

  • @delurkor
    @delurkor ปีที่แล้ว +139

    I believe Drach once pointed out that the French ship building industry served well as a subsidiary supplier for the RN during the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries.

    • @kirgan1000
      @kirgan1000 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      There are somthing Roman over the French navy. The British did burn/destroy/capture the fleet, the french build a new fleet in a rapid speed, and the cycle continue.

    • @frederiknielsen6038
      @frederiknielsen6038 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      Napoleonic french navy, otherwise known as the royal navy reserve

    • @bultelpascal3819
      @bultelpascal3819 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@kirgan1000 don't know if it's roman, but 2 centuries later france is twice bigger, has forest and part of its former empire ..... while the UK .... nothing.

    • @willlasdf123
      @willlasdf123 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      A big chunk of the better RN ships of the line were based on captured French ships. It's wild how the French tended to have arguably better ships and better guns during this period, and it just didn't matter in the broader scheme of things vs. British seamanship and gunnery in the era.

    • @overboss9599
      @overboss9599 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bultelpascal3819 yeah, it's almost like the useless French sat on their asses for most of the 2nd world war, while the british spent practically all their remaining blood and treasure attempting to actually win, instead of pussying out then pretending to be on the winning side.

  • @scott2836
    @scott2836 ปีที่แล้ว +52

    Excellent video, Drach. The French designed and built very good ships (arguably the equal or superior to British designs). The Revolution and its purges had a similar effect on the leadership of the Navy as it did on the Army, but where the Army saw some truly gifted soldiers rise to lead it, the Navy was damaged beyond repair. They were never collectively a serious challenge for the British afterwards. It’s a pity, objectively, that the ships never got the leaders that could make best use of them until it was far too late for them to become a significant factor. But they did enrich the British navy when they were captured, which may have been the best acknowledgement of their quality.

    • @psour33
      @psour33 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      The french revolution leaders and later the empire, considered that the french navy (Marine Royale at this time, in french) was a nest of royalists and nobles. So they didn't pay any attention to naval affairs. Napoleon himself was quick to anger about the fleet, but he never did anything for it.

    • @Axterix13
      @Axterix13 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I think being on the backfoot hurt the navy as well. With the army, you can drill in all sorts of places. With a navy, you need to go out into the ocean. But while the interior of France is safe to train that army in, out on the ocean there's probably a fleet of British ships waiting to pounce the moment you leave your harbor...
      So just harder to get that starting measure of experience even.

    • @grizwoldphantasia5005
      @grizwoldphantasia5005 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      France's strategic problem was being a territorial nation first and foremost; that long continental border and even the Spanish border had to be defended at all times, and when not necessary for defense, the army was useful for expansion. The navy was a luxury when push came to shove, so overseas colonies were expendable. Whereas Britain's army was never as necessary for defense, so it could have a full time navy to support colonies.

    • @grizwoldphantasia5005
      @grizwoldphantasia5005 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Axterix13 One peculiarity of French and British geography is that Atlantic coast French fleets need an eastern wind to get into the Bay of Biscay, then a western wind to round Brittany and get into the Channel to attack Britain. Whereas if the British blockade those Bay of Biscay ports, the same winds help them more than the French.

    • @richardarcher7177
      @richardarcher7177 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Axterix13 It also didn't help that the French tended to form a crew for a mission and if the ship survived and made it back to port the crew would often be broken up and the men dispersed to other ships. The result was little chance to accumulate experience unlike the Royal Navy where crews could remain together for years on end. providing intimate knowledge of their vessel and fellow crew.

  • @Patrick_Cooper
    @Patrick_Cooper ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I love the picture at 6:39. It is difficult to gage the size of old ships in most pictures, but seeing the workers sitting on a railing at the stern of the ship is really nice.

  • @princeoftonga
    @princeoftonga ปีที่แล้ว +8

    1:50 Dang!! Even the WW2 US ship printing machine would be impressed!

  • @MonkeyJedi99
    @MonkeyJedi99 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    One of the ships stuck around until 1905?!
    Now I am imagining these ships at the battle of Jutland.

  • @yes_head
    @yes_head ปีที่แล้ว +36

    Drach: "Please forgive me for mangling some French names, while I effortlessly reel off even more complicated Spanish names!" 😆 But it's cool that there are actually photos of some of these ships in their full first-rater glory.

    • @johnlavery3433
      @johnlavery3433 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Iirc one of Drach’s parents is Bolivian.

  • @graveyard1979
    @graveyard1979 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    It's this time when the French navy wasn't always the best performing one, but the ability of the French shipbuilding industry to mass build new ships was impressive. It's even most impressive because those weren't shoddily built "good enough" boats, but they were using newest scientific methods of the time in those designs.

    • @katrinapaton5283
      @katrinapaton5283 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I feel using green timbers probably helped contribute to the rate of production.

  • @cartmann94
    @cartmann94 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Late 18th century French ship designers: Let's make practical good ships! No hotels or tumblehome hulls.
    Late 19th century French ship designers: Sacre Bleu! Blasphemous!

  • @colinthompson2335
    @colinthompson2335 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I think Draco’s pronunciation of French words is much better than my attempts, and I’m effluent in many languages!

  • @historytank5673
    @historytank5673 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    wow 3 minutes glade to have caught another one of Drachs great videos so early

  • @davidpowell6098
    @davidpowell6098 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I am just building a model of the Santisima Trinidad, very interesting subjects you cover, thank you,.

  • @Riccardo_Silva
    @Riccardo_Silva ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Oh, yes, i saw that wonderful model! Since i live in northern Italy, the trip to Marseille is not that long. BTW, the museum definitely deserves a visit!

  • @FirstLast_Nba
    @FirstLast_Nba ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Always amazed at how large these vessels really were!

  • @johnfisher9692
    @johnfisher9692 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thanks Drach
    The sheer number of ships built is amazing when we look at today navy's.
    The amount of wood used in even one vessel would give an environmentalist nightmares.

    • @phildyrtt6433
      @phildyrtt6433 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Supplying an increasing draught of European ship-worthy oak was a major naval strategy concern...hence much of the charm of Scandanavia and North America.

  • @massimookissed1023
    @massimookissed1023 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    6:43 French early attempts at aircraft carriers were hampered by a lack of sails, and more notably, a lack of aircraft.

  • @leonardomafrareina7634
    @leonardomafrareina7634 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I have a suggestion: the Portuguese Galleons, specially the galleon Botafogo (Spitfire)

  • @ColinHarvey78
    @ColinHarvey78 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great! I was just researching these ships a bit - and then a Drachinifel video on them!

  • @mancubwwa
    @mancubwwa ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Technically the direct analogue, though not translation of Dauphin Royal would be Prince of Wales, or mabe Royal Prince of Wales as conotations (title related to a part of the kingdom, hereditary in the past but at this poin long associated with heir apparent) are identical.

  • @peterpenberthy2918
    @peterpenberthy2918 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very topical as I'm reading Julian Stockwins " Quartedeck."

  • @e-care-books9867
    @e-care-books9867 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Okay, this was a total... *Ship Show.* .... haha. Enjoyed the show, Carry On!

  • @GrumpyGrobbyGamer
    @GrumpyGrobbyGamer ปีที่แล้ว +3

    absolutely beautiful ships. Orient was majestic and powerful, right up until the moment she repositioned herself all over Aboukir Bay at high speed.

  • @ulflundberg5029
    @ulflundberg5029 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    A video of the Tonnant class ships would be very welcome.

  • @warhawk4494
    @warhawk4494 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I can't believe there are photos of these ships. It's crazy to think how fast technology advance in the 19th century.

  • @jasonz7788
    @jasonz7788 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you drach

  • @lewiswestfall2687
    @lewiswestfall2687 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks Drach

  • @senator1295
    @senator1295 ปีที่แล้ว

    excellent work

  • @marmieRH
    @marmieRH ปีที่แล้ว

    I Always search for my dad when you shows sailors 😊 he was on the Lloyd George but there is nothing on that ship also the Queen Mary and SS Cabano and lot more he was on mine sweepers and destroyers! Big hugs from Quebec!

  • @janlindtner305
    @janlindtner305 ปีที่แล้ว

    A lesser known area; but relevant for a complete picture. Thank you.

  • @stephenbritton9297
    @stephenbritton9297 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sadly, the Marseille museum was closed when I was there, some 25years ago. Although, Chataeu D'if was a liberty day well spent.

  • @Lord.Kiltridge
    @Lord.Kiltridge ปีที่แล้ว +4

    War Thunder is about to launch a French Naval tree. Drach should expect an uptick on views of his French 20th century Naval videos.

  • @joachimmacdonald2702
    @joachimmacdonald2702 ปีที่แล้ว

    the fact that someone who crewed a ship of the line could have seen a dreadnought is wild. the pace of technological development in the 19th and eatly 20th centuries was insane.

  • @exzendar2523
    @exzendar2523 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love your work!!!

  • @dougjb7848
    @dougjb7848 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Perhaps a future video will cover them.
    The RN especially has had multiples ships, or classes of ship, with same name.
    It’d be meat to learn about the various iterations of Warspite, for example.

  • @jjsmith4829
    @jjsmith4829 ปีที่แล้ว

    ah this is great that you reviewed this class. thanks.

  • @SnakebitSTI
    @SnakebitSTI ปีที่แล้ว

    This video got me thinking: What about making a video on the history of standardized ship designs?

  • @Sigil_Firebrand
    @Sigil_Firebrand ปีที่แล้ว +14

    "No views." I have never been this early on ANY video before, neat.

  • @swampking5417
    @swampking5417 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you thank you very much I always wanted to see this video. I

  • @jeebusk
    @jeebusk ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Last time I was this early,
    the oceans hadn't formed yet.

  • @phildyrtt6433
    @phildyrtt6433 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    🇺🇸Thank you very much. Fascinating.

  • @KRobi617
    @KRobi617 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love to see the Nuestra Senora in full detail!

  • @lafeelabriel
    @lafeelabriel ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Not only a very capable class, but also a nice looking one aestetically.
    And that's not something you can say that often about a three deck first rater..

  • @45641560456405640563
    @45641560456405640563 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    OK, strapping myself in for what is sure to be an interesting video.

  • @jantjarks7946
    @jantjarks7946 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    They actually look quite elegant as ships. The revolution took quite a toll on the french navy.

  • @nealsterling8151
    @nealsterling8151 ปีที่แล้ว

    Say what you want. These tall ships look simply amazing.

  • @bigsarge2085
    @bigsarge2085 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Fascinating!

  • @maxart3392
    @maxart3392 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Are you planning to cover Santisima Trinidad? In the maritime museum of Havana (Castillo de la Real Fuerza) there's a beautiful model.

  • @williamromine5715
    @williamromine5715 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    People wonder why the ships back then weren't saved as museum ships. As far as the military is concerned, ships are just a very expensive weapon of war, similar to a rifle. When the weapon no longer serves its purpose, it is discarded, be it a ship or a rifle. The military only has a limited budget, and is supposed to use that budget for weapons of war. If the ship is to be saved as a museum, it's up to the civil government or non government entities to spend the money to preserve and maintain the ship. It's only been relatively recent that the public has been willing absorb such costs. Sometimes we seem to blame the military for not preserving such magnificent ships.

  • @AdmiralMattsoy760
    @AdmiralMattsoy760 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi Drach!!! Very, very nice video as always. Can you also make a video of the British Neptune-class 98-gun 2nd rates??

  • @phildyrtt6433
    @phildyrtt6433 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can one even imagine the crews' sanitation conditions on these monstrous primitive gondolas?

  • @lachbullen8014
    @lachbullen8014 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Just imagine if the French decided to keep one of these ships around and made it in museum ship it would be the second old ship of the line next to the Victory..

    • @spirz4557
      @spirz4557 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Si seulement...

    • @Noelegamer
      @Noelegamer 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Océan is bigger than the Victory

  • @221b-l3t
    @221b-l3t ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Fantastic more age of sail please. The obusier de vaisseau and Spanish obusier have been a source of great pain to me. I am building the spanish frigate Diana and her top deck was meant to carry Spanish obusiers. All i can find is that they are similar to the obusier de vaisseau and short verbal descriptions. No drawing anywhere. I gave up and used 9 pounder longs but I would love to know more especially a picture. Would carronaded ve adequate? If anyone has more info please share or Drach :) And yes please more age of sail. There is so much WWII coverage but very little high quality AOS stuff on TH-cam.

    • @cesarsalas8506
      @cesarsalas8506 ปีที่แล้ว

      You need to look in Spanish sources. "Obús" should render some results. There's a Page called "Todo a Babor" that had quite a bit of info on these matters.

    • @221b-l3t
      @221b-l3t ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@cesarsalas8506 Thanks you! Luckily I speak just enough Spanish to understand 30% so should be able to find something. I tried French before I might have found a drawing can't remember. But thanks

  • @raigarmullerson4838
    @raigarmullerson4838 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Love the videos. Cheers from Estonia

  • @ravenknight4876
    @ravenknight4876 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's quite interesting how a good portion of the French Fleet ended up serving in the royal Navy.

  • @Alex-cw3rz
    @Alex-cw3rz ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Such a shame non of these survive, love HMS Victory but I want to see a captains cabin with a balcony.

  • @leroiarouf1142
    @leroiarouf1142 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ur french pronociation is very good :)

  • @mungmungie
    @mungmungie ปีที่แล้ว

    Suggestion for a ship review: floating brewery HMS Menestheus.

  • @The_Modeling_Underdog
    @The_Modeling_Underdog ปีที่แล้ว

    Well, you gotta give it to the French. Some of their late 18th century naval designs are very, very pleasing.
    Great video, Drach.

    • @alganhar1
      @alganhar1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      There was never anything wrong with French Ships. Indeed they were at least equal to, and often better than their British equivalents. The problem with the French Navy, at least in the Napoleonic era, was that their leadership, including most of their most competent Captains and Admirals had been beheaded, often quite literally. This is compounded by the British blockade keeping those ships more often than not bottled up in port where they had little opportunity to train their crews in seamanship or gunnery. Add to that the complete disregard Napoleon had for the French Navy and you have a recipe for disaster.
      In turn they were going against a navy that was constantly at sea, constantly honing and training their crews, ships commanded, on the whole by competent, aggressive Captains and Admirals. It really is an illustration of how important adequate training is for complex weapons platforms such as Capital Ships. And really that was Frances problem. Their ships were good, there was nothing intrinsically wrong with their sailors, they just did not get the opportunity for training and sea time the Royal Navy sailors did.

    • @thomasbaker6563
      @thomasbaker6563 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@alganhar1 Sea worthiness in poor weather was often sacrificed by french designed ships, navwepons (the website) has an interesting article on the subject.

  • @Big_E_Soul_Fragment
    @Big_E_Soul_Fragment ปีที่แล้ว +8

    French Navy: that one player who's not happy with their IGN so they kept renaming

  • @Kevin_Kennelly
    @Kevin_Kennelly ปีที่แล้ว

    2:10 "the floating barn"

  • @patrickbrennan7048
    @patrickbrennan7048 ปีที่แล้ว

    More age of sail content please!

  • @johngregory4801
    @johngregory4801 ปีที่แล้ว

    The lower gundeck looks to be about 7° of heel from taking in water unless the gunports seal VERY well.

  • @jaymichaels5187
    @jaymichaels5187 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do a video on the Minotaur-class armoured cruisers, like the HMS Defence, an early casualty at Jutland.

  • @leroiarouf1142
    @leroiarouf1142 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thx you

  • @idaho_girl
    @idaho_girl ปีที่แล้ว

    AS a sailor, you hear how it is bad luck to rename a boat or ship. I couldn't help but think of this throughout your video!

    • @Noelegamer
      @Noelegamer 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      yet it never sank

  • @grondhero
    @grondhero ปีที่แล้ว

    I for one appreciate the lost technology that allows the pre-steamship vessel images to be a higher quality than the WW1 vessels. 😉

  • @richmcgee434
    @richmcgee434 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Age of Sail French - "Before our ships got ugly!" :)

  • @me67galaxylife
    @me67galaxylife ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I Hope there will be an episode about the Ocean ironclads, you don’t see much talk about them

    • @dougjb7848
      @dougjb7848 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Perhaps a future video will cover them.
      The RN especially has had multiples ships, or classes of ship, with same name.
      It’d be meat to learn about the various interactions of Warspite, for example.

    • @jantjarks7946
      @jantjarks7946 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Indeed, it's difficult to get reliable sources from the early propeller driven steam ships with sails.
      It seems they fell in some historical gap. 😉

    • @kevinbayu7621
      @kevinbayu7621 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Broadside ironclads in particular are very interesting, some even mounted ram like pre-gunpowder galley.

    • @me67galaxylife
      @me67galaxylife ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kevinbayu7621 even pre-dreadnoughts and the first dreadnoughts had rams actually;
      fun fact : the only ship hms dreadnought sank was a u-boat... that she rammed

  • @bencetary6094
    @bencetary6094 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The only shame in coming early is that I cannot read the comments while listening to the video.

  • @TooLateForIeago
    @TooLateForIeago ปีที่แล้ว +1

    When considering the displacement of a tall ship, do you include its armament in the calculation?

  • @williamthornburgh3675
    @williamthornburgh3675 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Drach do you know that all of your vids are 50% lower in volume than ALL other videos I watch? Bit of a pain to jack ur vol up then down after.

  • @gracesprocket7340
    @gracesprocket7340 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The British 24: 5.823", low gauge 5.546", mean gauge 5.5931" est weight 23.301lb English
    The French 24 (english measure) 6.0022", high gauge 5.8024", mean gauge for places 5.7698", est weight mean 25.58lb English
    18lb and 12lb gun patterns show a similar proportion, but the French 8livre is nearly identical to the English 9pdr.
    Note that the English windage is specified from the low gauge, the French fix their high gauge, Both high gauges are of a similar proportion, but the difference between high and low gauge is larger for the English system for the larger patterns of guns. French specify a fixed interval between gauges, the English a fixed fraction of the low gauge allowance - for larger patterns the french guns have less spread in the windage from the same maximum. In the gaillard pattern guns the french calibres have less tightly controlled windage.
    After 1817 the English guns got revised gauges (mostly the high gauge is unchanged, and the low gauge raised) - and the new windage was specified from the mean, rather than low gauged shot. The French got revised gauges at around the same time, but this was more a conversion of the old 'point' sizing of ordnance based on 144th of a French inch to the new metric sizes, but without any substantial changes in dimension.
    Later gauges for both increased both low and high gauges and tended to retain or tighten the interval between them.

  • @red.5475
    @red.5475 ปีที่แล้ว

    YES. MOAR FIRST RATES.

  • @Philistine47
    @Philistine47 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What was the RN assessment of these ships (either pre- or post-capture)?

  • @michaelgent3316
    @michaelgent3316 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just a suggestion maybe the CSS Shenandoah history, never posted before bu have been watching for a long time (Years I think)

  • @arthurthedented
    @arthurthedented ปีที่แล้ว

    How much did the design and designers influence the Class of US frigates represented by the Constitution? and would that be an interesting video? Did Humphries have any contact with the french? was Franco-philic Jefferson likely to push that way? or are the similarities between these 'ahead of their time' ships... just something superficial and merely 'best practices' the best naval architects all knew but only some navies were willing to stretch to?

  • @LRoss2777
    @LRoss2777 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Been waiting years for the 50+ min Temeraire-class 74 video... How can we make this happen? I'll assist in research as much as needed.

  • @ionaguirre
    @ionaguirre ปีที่แล้ว

    Unfortunatelly the information about the Stsma Trinidad is wrong.
    She only stayed as a floating pond until the works to be done were agreed. On 1796 she was almost dismantled and rebuilt. Decks lowered and breath increased. Lenght was also enlarged mostly at the stern allowing for a lot better water flow to the rudder. As i said almost the whole work was rebuilt.
    Admiral Collingwood appreciate her so much that after Trafalgar tried to tow the ship by all means. Only the arrival of a fresh fleet made him order to blow the Trinidad up and scape to Gibraltar.
    Hustory is not what we'd like, but what is was.

  • @GizmoDuck_1860
    @GizmoDuck_1860 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video. I do like me a sailing gal. Were they known as "Ocean class" back then, or is that a modern term? Tangent: at 00:22, what happens to that turret? Looks like something breaks off of it.

  • @Archie2c
    @Archie2c ปีที่แล้ว

    Set top Gallants and Stuncels

  • @kidmohair8151
    @kidmohair8151 ปีที่แล้ว

    as someone in Québec pointed out to me concerning my french...
    "you sound like an englishman, speaking french",
    which is better than an englishman shouting
    at a french (or any other language) person on the assumption
    that volume somehow improves comprehension.

  • @AlternativePractice
    @AlternativePractice ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Naval Action flashbacks

  • @nk_3332
    @nk_3332 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Has Drach seen the worst loss of life in the Russia navy since the Battle of Tsushima? The Vulhdar offensive: th-cam.com/video/FWIzhP6G7S8/w-d-xo.html
    They took the crews from the minesweepers and landing craft gave them a few rifles and tanks and sent them into battle, without their ships. Kamchatka could have done a better job.

  • @McRocket
    @McRocket ปีที่แล้ว

    You didn't talk about their armor.
    Oh...right.
    Nevermind.

  • @stevewebster5729
    @stevewebster5729 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    For me, though very impressive ships their lack of sailing speed and gun firing speed were their downfall. Weight of broadside is all very well, but you have to be in position to fire effectively and then be able to keep it up.

    • @jonny-b4954
      @jonny-b4954 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah. Getting into position and raining hell with say 75 guns is way more important than half assed 100 gun broadsides

    • @stevewebster5729
      @stevewebster5729 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@jonny-b4954 it's not the number so much as the weight of the individual cannons. I helped move one of the 1744 Victorys 42s into a conservation tank in the Royal dockyard and can see why the navy stopped using them. Just too slow firing...

    • @cesarsalas8506
      @cesarsalas8506 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Rightfully so. Similar problems as those encountered with the "Santísima Trinidad", very powerful artillery, but a slow and cumbersome ship. Up to the point it restricted the maneouvres of the whole fleet in engagements.

  • @magnumserpentine6444
    @magnumserpentine6444 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is Take Two
    (Sorry my first comment was so jumbled it even gave me a headache so lets try this again)
    First of all, The FN (?) Ship Ocean video was super great. Thank you for it. Also could you do a video on United States Battleships Philadelphia, Franklin, Ohio, Pennsylvania etc (All have 3 gun decks) And could you explain why the US Government did not commission many of our early Battleships into service (leaving them to rot on the slipways) I know for a fact (I am a US and Military Historian) that USA had the money for at least 20 to 40 Battleships. But it seems as if the US Government was afraid to spend any money at all. (A case in point to prove that US Government was afraid to spend Money. In the early years of the USA (1800 ish) There was a need to make improvements to already existing roads. A bill was passed in Congress only to be Vetoed by President Jefferson who said it cost too much. (In my opinion it did not (cost too much) and this proves the US Government was afraid to spend money (Shrugs)) Sorry for the politics just a bit put off that the US Government would be so stingy to let our strongest military units rot away. Thank you kind sir for reading this letter.

    • @magnumserpentine6444
      @magnumserpentine6444 ปีที่แล้ว

      er a small correction. I think Philadelphia was a Constitution/ Constellation class Frigate not a Battleship. Sorry about that

  • @firefox5926
    @firefox5926 ปีที่แล้ว

    0:13 ironicly the ocean clas was in fact limited to rivers the rivers class on the other hand ...

  • @markhuber5981
    @markhuber5981 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I would love to see your take on the "Ship of Theseus" argument as it relates to the USS Constellation in Baltimore Md. The ship is currently presented as a sloop-of-war built in the 1850's despite as recently as the 1970's, being claimed by everyone, the US Navy and US Congress included, to be the 1794 frigate Constellation, making it the oldest ship in the US Navy. If she were a "new" ship in 1854, there would have been a bill authorizing her construction. There was none. There was an extensive rebuild with nearly everything replaced in 1854, but no authorization to build a new ship. In the 1980's the US Navy and the city of Boston were pushing the USS Constitution and pouring money into her while Constellation was hogging badly in Baltimore. The Navy finally agreed to put money in to save Constellation, only if she would be rigged and presented as the sloop-of-war built new in the 1850's. Whether it's the "Ship of Theseus" or the "Grandfather's Axe" debate, if you replace all of somethings component parts over a long time, is it still the same thing?

  • @CorePathway
    @CorePathway ปีที่แล้ว

    148 ships of the line. They laid waste to entire forests! Even the US WWII naval production is impressed.

  • @terrybarrett2368
    @terrybarrett2368 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do you have any information about the French man of war built 1797 captured at the Battle of Trafalgar 1805 sculled 1947

  • @miquelra6927
    @miquelra6927 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you talk about navy and submarines during the 1936-39 Spanish civil War

  • @Diego-zz1df
    @Diego-zz1df ปีที่แล้ว

    As always, pre-XX France leading the way in naval construction while Britain leads the way in naval tactics.

  • @inyobill
    @inyobill ปีที่แล้ว

    THe lower gun deck in the drawings appear veryt close to the water line. Wet?

  • @morriganmhor5078
    @morriganmhor5078 ปีที่แล้ว

    Drach, were any of the Ocean class man-o-wars at Trafalgar? And if yeah, how they fared?

    • @Noelegamer
      @Noelegamer 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      No Océan at trafalgar