I want to encourage cross-eyed stereo in general but I must say that the stereo separation is too much by perhaps 2x. The rendering is beautiful. More please.
Very good, but it's broken by one single major flaw: The distance between the two viewpoints is WAY too large. You need to reduce that down to around 10-20% of the current distance. Obviously, it differs for each viewer, but you're better off having two images too close to each other rather than too far away. (Kind of in the same way that you're better off having camerawork that's too flat and smooth rather than too shaky and jerky) If the viewpoints are too close to each other, then the 3D aspect seems too subtle to detect, and your viewer is stuck looking cross-eyed at a very clean, clear, and beautiful 2D image. But the viewpoints are too far apart, so your viewers (like me) end up losing grip on the image and sometimes even having to look away and try to re-focus all over again - IE: totally lose your audience. Obviously, one thing to keep in mind is that you're zooming in, so *your viewpoints will have to get progressively closer to keep up with the zoom*. Otherwise soon you're looking at detail as if it was touching the front of your nose - Impossible for viewers to keep up with. Having the viewpoint unification occur at a slightly slower rate than the zoom would be a fantastic subtle way to give a sense of the tiny scales you're zooming to. This kind of thing is what makes the difference in video and film composition.
Thank you, Generic. But I wanted as much depth as possible, so it looked more 3D. And it wasn't a problem to maintain focus at all, so it stayed that way.
@zsirhorcsog Search for the yt3d: tag. With that you can tell youtube which portion is left vs. right eye. Then youtube will the viewers 3d rendering options. See for instance v=eWuLsM_lFmo
Yay, pretty nice video and audio! How have you done the stereo-rendering in M3D, since there is no stereo-redering implemented till now? Have you rendered the keyframes for the left, then slightly changed their persepective and rendered them again? keep on the good work! greets,
This is very good work. I find it interesting that there is a phenomenon whereby an interocular distance, I take it that you get that from the y rotation, that is constant makes zooms look small. Arial stereo pairs are often separated by many yards while close up macro pictures have a fraction of an inch separation. The result of this is just that when you zoom into your details they look smaller and smaller. Apparently the 3d movie people have figured this out.
@d0lphchrist You're right, first I made the fly through, and then rotated every keyframe around the Y axis for the left eye. Its so simple, I wonder why dont make nobody anaglyph or stereo animations with the mandelbulb/box. :)
@jericsynergy Yes I heard about that, but at the uploading process I couldn't figure out how to enable that function. Anyways, I think cross eyeing is more simple than buy an anaglyph glass. :)
Really amazing 3D effect! One of the best I've seen so far. The crisp 3D detail blew me away!
I want to encourage cross-eyed stereo in general but I must say that the stereo separation is too much by perhaps 2x. The rendering is beautiful. More please.
Very good, but it's broken by one single major flaw: The distance between the two viewpoints is WAY too large.
You need to reduce that down to around 10-20% of the current distance.
Obviously, it differs for each viewer, but you're better off having two images too close to each other rather than too far away.
(Kind of in the same way that you're better off having camerawork that's too flat and smooth rather than too shaky and jerky)
If the viewpoints are too close to each other, then the 3D aspect seems too subtle to detect, and your viewer is stuck looking cross-eyed at a very clean, clear, and beautiful 2D image.
But the viewpoints are too far apart, so your viewers (like me) end up losing grip on the image and sometimes even having to look away and try to re-focus all over again - IE: totally lose your audience.
Obviously, one thing to keep in mind is that you're zooming in, so *your viewpoints will have to get progressively closer to keep up with the zoom*. Otherwise soon you're looking at detail as if it was touching the front of your nose - Impossible for viewers to keep up with.
Having the viewpoint unification occur at a slightly slower rate than the zoom would be a fantastic subtle way to give a sense of the tiny scales you're zooming to. This kind of thing is what makes the difference in video and film composition.
Thank you, Generic. But I wanted as much depth as possible, so it looked more 3D. And it wasn't a problem to maintain focus at all, so it stayed that way.
...and i think it is kinda narrow -- _ --
for me it worked really good on this one. maybe it has to do with monitor size and distance you sit away from it?
This is the most amazing video I have ever seen in my life.
Great 3D effect !
@zsirhorcsog Search for the yt3d: tag. With that you can tell youtube which portion is left vs. right eye. Then youtube will the viewers 3d rendering options. See for instance v=eWuLsM_lFmo
not aligned right, but still pretty good
My eyes! The goggles do nothing!
Jaron Lindow i can view it in 3D without any glasses/goggles
Awesome!!! Please do more of these!
Great!
@ophello
I can re-render, but I dont think I will do that. :)
The original rendering time was 4 weeks, so thats why.
they aren’t perfectly symmetrical so it doesn’t work
wow that is crazy
veeevyvevy nice!!
I love this video ...
Do you have in side-by-side?
Greetings
AW-SUHM!!! MORE I want more more i want more
Nice work. I'm still waiting for crossview movies to go mainstream. Certainly easier than putting on VR headset.
Amazing, but I couldn't watch it completely. My stomach turned along with the fractal.
Yay, pretty nice video and audio!
How have you done the stereo-rendering in M3D, since there is no stereo-redering implemented till now?
Have you rendered the keyframes for the left, then slightly changed their persepective and rendered them again?
keep on the good work!
greets,
hilarious, Terence McKenna: "300 micrograms is the dose."
Usually, he spoke of five dried grams... of mushrooms.
This is very good work. I find it interesting that there is a phenomenon whereby an interocular distance, I take it that you get that from the y rotation, that is constant makes zooms look small. Arial stereo pairs are often separated by many yards while close up macro pictures have a fraction of an inch separation. The result of this is just that when you zoom into your details they look smaller and smaller. Apparently the 3d movie people have figured this out.
Parallax is almost too wide. Can you re-render with a smaller stereo difference?
probably the best one i have seen
the 3D effects are AWESOME!
This one was too difficult for me.
Great !
Awesome!!! Please do more of these!
@d0lphchrist
You're right, first I made the fly through, and then rotated every keyframe around the Y axis for the left eye. Its so simple, I wonder why dont make nobody anaglyph or stereo animations with the mandelbulb/box. :)
@jericsynergy
Yes I heard about that, but at the uploading process I couldn't figure out how to enable that function.
Anyways, I think cross eyeing is more simple than buy an anaglyph glass. :)
@jericsynergy
Yep. But I think its not that easy. I really didnt find anywhere the 3D option.
@zsirhorcsog : there should be a yt3d:enable=true option somewhere
Damn, makes me wanna see more in 3d
Sweet fancy moses! That was freeking awesome. Can't wait till my next trip mmmmmm.
This is literally blowing my mind right now
This is breathtaking
2:00 ⏩👌