It is not cool what they did to the 20mm of the amx32 , it is suppose to be free and faster to mode than the gun , it is an OPTION , crew can chose between follow the gun and free from the gun
Hopefully the AMX-40 will get it's correct armour, and it and the Vextra will get a better shell. Then they can go up to 10.7 with the Leopard 2A4NL. Right now the Leopard 2A4NL is at 10.7 all by itself.
Finaly somebody who talk about the amx 40! I have made a post on the forum for them to be able to record the interior and the armor , but they respond that "this info are not releable"(it's the official stat and a video of the interior of the tank + official article)
I'm not sure if a better shell could push the Vextra all the way from its current 9.7 to 10.7. What's needed to give the Leopard 2A4NL a lineup is the Vextra POLE with a 120mm smoothbore. And the CV9035NL MLU (which adds Spike-LR2, an elevated optics mast, and Iron Fist APS). Add those and fix the AMX-40's armor, and that makes for an excellent 10.7 lineup.
I think they are worried if the nato tanks were all as strong as they should be and about on par with the leos there would be no reason to play Russia.
The XM803 and MBT-70 changes are because they screwed up the numbers for the ammo and actually entered in earlier iterations of the ammo and gun specs, not the final proposed vehicle design, when calculating it. Instead of giving the vehicles their actual specs as they were realized in their final form, they just changed the name back to earlier iterations. This means different alloy and projectile design for the APFSDS and different barrel. God forbid the darts behave as they actually did, which were tested to consistently penetrate 6" at 60 degrees RHA at 1km. 152.4mm MINIMUM CONFIRMED PEN at 60 degrees at 1km. Gaijin has it at 147mm, so that should make it very obvious they're just being stubborn about these vehicles for some reason. There was even a bug report showing the original 1970s testing documents where the XM803 and MBT70 XM579 round variations penetrated 6" at 60 degrees and they just said their calculation was right. Their calculation of the round's performance was more right than the documents from the literal rocket scientists who invented and tested the round. The document which was made public AFTER the nerf and they couldn't have had access to. Oh and by the way they replied that they got their info from that document. They had the balls to claim that they got their information from a document which both contradicts the performance AND which was classified until AFTER the changes went through. Pretty cool stuff!
Very cool and informative review, i like it that there are no plane bs, dont have a single cas while i have germany and ussr ground tech tree fully unlocked
Wow, I think they fixed the bug I reported a while ago now! The crew swapping issue with the Sdkz. 234/4. I had just lost a crew and was relocating quickly then suddenly became paralyzed. Checked the x-ray and the crew swap decided to move my only remaining driver to gunner… I remained like that the rest of the match for like eight minutes. Incredibly frustrating. Surprisingly, I do not think I ended up dying because I already killed some six enemy tanks and our team was winning.
@@ryanrautenberg6092 Tbf 11.3 or 11.7 in ground doesnt matter too much since there arent too many vehicles on those BRs and you will play both at 12.0 anyways
first of all, thanks fo5r that comprehensive video. The German TH-camr reib00n actually tested this side by side. Basicallw with the Leopard 2s you could look at your 4:30 or something, now you can look at your 3:30, maybe 4, before the gun elevates. Same goes obv. for the left side. Could you maybe check that out, too? Rhanks a lot for your good work! :)
Reason me and alot of other people enjoy the t-72 more is the massive weak spots on the ztz96, I've been killed in the ztz more times by people randomly shooting than the t-72 becuse you need to be more precise when shooting thr t-72
@@r6sm043the problem with the t72 is they have the same weak spot as all the soviet heavy tanks so lots of players instinctually shoot the lfp and it works every time.
Man... i know a lot of people wanted the scimitar to be added to the british, but we already have the fox, and it's basically just a tracked fox, i wish gaijin added some other ground vehicle for britain along with it. Hopefully gaijin fixes the issues with some of the British vehicles, like the Crusaders.
The new afterburners are truly awesome. I’ve been using custom afterburner skins for years now (the old original is some pixellated garbage)and this is better than those easily. The new vapor effects are cool too though i haven’t able to replicate it on too much vehicles not sure its a bug or intentional. So far only the F15 series and Su27/34 series produced these new effects to me.
Sadly yes , japan is one of the worst, after italy , tech tree with no véhicule and no regard the gaijin of they're existence, and the only time they look at japan they nerf it, it's depressing
and no fix to the chinese top tier vehicles((((((( ztz99a must have a 800mm ufp without era, vt-4 also lacks armour and it must be 750mm without era also chinese top tier lacks spall liners
I hope they fix the L27 rounds, beacuse right now they suck. Even the l26 is garbage. I shot a t0 breech with my chally 1 with l26 abd i got hits and non pen, ON THE FUCKING BREECH AND BARREL
Which tanks? Nearly all of T series still have worst reverse speeds, and reload, its better at that, because if its fix, you’d get 12+ secs if you switch shells.
@@lordbumpy3634 reload is nearly less than 6 seconds on T90M and T72B3 tanks T80BVM is 6.5 standard for reverse gear on newly produced T90M and T72B3 tanks has been changed to 24 km/h in revere since the start of the war which is FAR before we had it in war thunder so there is no reason for it not to have it you can literally look at the videos from ukraine of T90 series reversing out of combat far far faster than their older counterparts
It is not cool what they did to the 20mm of the amx32 , it is suppose to be free and faster to mode than the gun , it is an OPTION , crew can chose between follow the gun and free from the gun
Also a bug of the KPz 70, if you took out the breach of the 20mm autocannon it would still be able to fire it no problem.
@@touchgrass7834 It shouldn't be but its still able to
Hopefully the AMX-40 will get it's correct armour, and it and the Vextra will get a better shell. Then they can go up to 10.7 with the Leopard 2A4NL.
Right now the Leopard 2A4NL is at 10.7 all by itself.
Finaly somebody who talk about the amx 40! I have made a post on the forum for them to be able to record the interior and the armor , but they respond that "this info are not releable"(it's the official stat and a video of the interior of the tank + official article)
And apparently there is a bug report on the optic as well. For me the crappy optics ruin it for me
@@petitg.t2913yeah it’s not Russian so no hope of anything a all being fixed for them, sad noises
I'm not sure if a better shell could push the Vextra all the way from its current 9.7 to 10.7. What's needed to give the Leopard 2A4NL a lineup is the Vextra POLE with a 120mm smoothbore. And the CV9035NL MLU (which adds Spike-LR2, an elevated optics mast, and Iron Fist APS). Add those and fix the AMX-40's armor, and that makes for an excellent 10.7 lineup.
@@RedXlV even if the vextra got 500 ish pen it would be usable at top tier. Who cares about br. As long as it’s like 10.3
they would sooner give every nation a leo before they fixed their tanks
I think they are worried if the nato tanks were all as strong as they should be and about on par with the leos there would be no reason to play Russia.
Well there isnt any reason to play germany now.
The XM803 and MBT-70 changes are because they screwed up the numbers for the ammo and actually entered in earlier iterations of the ammo and gun specs, not the final proposed vehicle design, when calculating it. Instead of giving the vehicles their actual specs as they were realized in their final form, they just changed the name back to earlier iterations.
This means different alloy and projectile design for the APFSDS and different barrel. God forbid the darts behave as they actually did, which were tested to consistently penetrate 6" at 60 degrees RHA at 1km. 152.4mm MINIMUM CONFIRMED PEN at 60 degrees at 1km. Gaijin has it at 147mm, so that should make it very obvious they're just being stubborn about these vehicles for some reason.
There was even a bug report showing the original 1970s testing documents where the XM803 and MBT70 XM579 round variations penetrated 6" at 60 degrees and they just said their calculation was right. Their calculation of the round's performance was more right than the documents from the literal rocket scientists who invented and tested the round. The document which was made public AFTER the nerf and they couldn't have had access to. Oh and by the way they replied that they got their info from that document. They had the balls to claim that they got their information from a document which both contradicts the performance AND which was classified until AFTER the changes went through.
Pretty cool stuff!
You missed Vectra 105 and amx 40 being moved up to rank 7 from rank 6
gaijin desperately trying to conceal the rank 7 gap (more of a chasm tbh)
@@2goober4u no they had leclerc s1 and s2 in rank 7... They moved it up in this update to rank 8 for good
Grinding top tier with heat stock was so painful
@@scripterzofindia that’s economy changes
@@TheEuropeanCanadian oh... video incoming on that topic?
Very cool and informative review, i like it that there are no plane bs, dont have a single cas while i have germany and ussr ground tech tree fully unlocked
I love how last 2 updates where just nerfs to vilkas and noone knows why
Oh boy the m60s can reverse, when are the gonna fix the first stage ammo so I don't have a wall of ammo in my turret and only half a bussle rack
The ZT3A2 Missile also got a velocity increase from 220m/s to 342m/s on the Dev server, makes a decent difference!
Wait there are actually people who play Ho-Ro with the AP over HE?
Wow, I think they fixed the bug I reported a while ago now! The crew swapping issue with the Sdkz. 234/4. I had just lost a crew and was relocating quickly then suddenly became paralyzed. Checked the x-ray and the crew swap decided to move my only remaining driver to gunner… I remained like that the rest of the match for like eight minutes. Incredibly frustrating. Surprisingly, I do not think I ended up dying because I already killed some six enemy tanks and our team was winning.
on the dev server the up tied the SU-25K to 10.7 from 10.0
Finally, now they need to move the a10c to go down to 11.3- 11.7 ground rb since the su39 is still sitting at 11.3 with an insane loadout
@@ryanrautenberg6092 cry hafo bot
@@ryanrautenberg6092 Tbf 11.3 or 11.7 in ground doesnt matter too much since there arent too many vehicles on those BRs and you will play both at 12.0 anyways
Whats hafo @@KOTANIMEUWU
first of all, thanks fo5r that comprehensive video. The German TH-camr reib00n actually tested this side by side. Basicallw with the Leopard 2s you could look at your 4:30 or something, now you can look at your 3:30, maybe 4, before the gun elevates. Same goes obv. for the left side. Could you maybe check that out, too?
Rhanks a lot for your good work! :)
Its interesting how everyone calls the ZTZ96 worse soviet vehicles while I enjoy the ZTZ96s way more than the T-72s
Reason me and alot of other people enjoy the t-72 more is the massive weak spots on the ztz96, I've been killed in the ztz more times by people randomly shooting than the t-72 becuse you need to be more precise when shooting thr t-72
@@r6sm043the problem with the t72 is they have the same weak spot as all the soviet heavy tanks so lots of players instinctually shoot the lfp and it works every time.
@@snugglecity3500 oh yer, however it's way more prominent on the Chinese tanks as they are basically the same exact tank but enlarged by 2x
Man... i know a lot of people wanted the scimitar to be added to the british, but we already have the fox, and it's basically just a tracked fox, i wish gaijin added some other ground vehicle for britain along with it.
Hopefully gaijin fixes the issues with some of the British vehicles, like the Crusaders.
Still cannot put away sepv2 era bruh
You missed that the Freccia gets two more spikes from 8 to 10
The fact that we dont have the PLA's main workhorse the ZTZ96B is suck a damn crime
thankyou boss :)
i dont understand the thing with the 2s25m looking behind you gives you more depression and elevation ?
Breech changes has the wrong time stamp.
So you are telling me that they got the fv4005 weight wrong by 9 tons?
The new afterburners are truly awesome. I’ve been using custom afterburner skins for years now (the old original is some pixellated garbage)and this is better than those easily.
The new vapor effects are cool too though i haven’t able to replicate it on too much vehicles not sure its a bug or intentional. So far only the F15 series and Su27/34 series produced these new effects to me.
No type 89 nerfs??
why the hell would it need it
poor japan just getting nerfed
Sadly yes , japan is one of the worst, after italy , tech tree with no véhicule and no regard the gaijin of they're existence, and the only time they look at japan they nerf it, it's depressing
So the skink is nearly worthless UNTIL they add it to American… ya Tech American needs more help lol
no updates on the m774 rework?
and no fix to the chinese top tier vehicles((((((( ztz99a must have a 800mm ufp without era, vt-4 also lacks armour and it must be 750mm without era also chinese top tier lacks spall liners
2S38 need a nerf or put in 11.0....
11.0 for a bmp chassis with a 57mm auto canon firing APFSDS? With no ATGMS? Yeah no. No other IFVS are at 11.0 and they have better weaponry etc
@@oz314 yes because have same survivality vs dm23 or vs dm33 and pen mbts in front!!! + have wounderfull ammo to shot down helis from 4-5 km
@@oz314while Hstvl is much higher br than 2S38.
@oz314 what about the hstvl, which only has a slightly higher pen of like 50mm and a reload that's 3x longer (inaccurately slow)
@@ryanrautenberg6092 cry hafo bot
Ah yes another 10.3 antiair thats better than adats! They gave the adats an 50 cal thi😊
Is there even "weather" during GB?
Yeah it's mostly negligible but sometimes there's a really hazy overcast that can hamper visibility, it mostly effects how high/low CAS can fly
I love gaijin nerfing french stuff, typical
I hope they fix the L27 rounds, beacuse right now they suck. Even the l26 is garbage. I shot a t0 breech with my chally 1 with l26 abd i got hits and non pen, ON THE FUCKING BREECH AND BARREL
T90, excuse my spelling
Sigh still no russuan reverse speed and reload speed fix thats sad
Which tanks? Nearly all of T series still have worst reverse speeds, and reload, its better at that, because if its fix, you’d get 12+ secs if you switch shells.
@@lordbumpy3634 reload is nearly less than 6 seconds on T90M and T72B3 tanks T80BVM is 6.5
standard for reverse gear on newly produced T90M and T72B3 tanks has been changed to 24 km/h in revere since the start of the war which is FAR before we had it in war thunder so there is no reason for it not to have it
you can literally look at the videos from ukraine of T90 series reversing out of combat far far faster than their older counterparts
Eff this stupid game and it’s stupid matchmaker… One tank lineups for the win !!!!
What? Nahhh
Bro is everything wrong with the game