Interrogé sur les allégations de Veeren, Pravind Jugnauth perd son sang-froid

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 15

  • @mariebaker4901
    @mariebaker4901 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Qui c'est le plus Grand mafia de la drogues

  • @kinfoonglaw
    @kinfoonglaw 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Il n'y a pas de fumée sans feu.

  • @mariebaker4901
    @mariebaker4901 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Media batiara media history builder's

  • @kaleemsummally5976
    @kaleemsummally5976 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Il n’y avait jamais un caca sans odeur 💩

  • @MJC-vv7lq
    @MJC-vv7lq 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Si on a rien à se reproché on doit pouvoir garder son self contrôle. To pé gagne ène gros ner . On ne peut profiter de ce que on a mal acquis . Passer par la petite fenêtre c'était pas juste . Maintenant il faut assumer . Vous n'êtes plus crédible il aurait fallu révoquer soodhun au lieu de minimiser. Et la liste est longue.....

  • @Debelius-13
    @Debelius-13 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ki to exciter ta normal bizin mett un lanket

  • @kun534
    @kun534 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Ki reputation to ena gopia lolll

  • @MrNic0606
    @MrNic0606 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Something simple if there’s strict and tight control no way drugs get into the country, Pravind promised he will clean mauritius from drugs but it’s getting worst

  • @sanjeevbactow3687
    @sanjeevbactow3687 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    ban zournalist parfois zot insinifian zot fer dimoun perdi so sand froid . palab pena la presse dan sa pays!!!

  • @naasiruddinjhootoo4079
    @naasiruddinjhootoo4079 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    jounalis la p provok pravin msm mem pa ti kone sipa zot ti pu gagne election journalis batiara la p 2fan droger

    • @l0g1cseer47
      @l0g1cseer47 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Naasiruddin Jhootoo I do respect your point of view. But I feel that you are misjudging the rights of journalism. The question here is if as leader of MSM, whether he took money from the drug lord to finance his electoral campaign. For the sake of the argument, one of his members probably did since, Mr. Pravin is a righteous man and he would never accept that. Assuming that one of his party member took the money made the campaign and surprisingly succeeded to power. We never did vote for him, we voted for his dad. Whatever, as per my explanation above he escaped it. and He is the Prime minister now.
      What is clear is that he reacted awfully bad for a prime minister though he knows that is the kind of questions that you will have to face from journalists. His response was lame as a Figure of Power. He demonstrated fear by reacting carelessly and giving in judgemental remorse of being unable to say otherwise. When instead, he could have said, the law will work it out.
      Now because I am saying that does not mean that I am siding with the drug lord. Of course, that is purely delusional and inappropriate response, suggesting such a thing demonstrates that he has lost his senses by removing all faith in what is the current reality. Meaning unsure what to believe. Thus, he went ahead and started making personal attacks against any who opposes his truth over the convict Peeroomal like a scared child having his favorite toy taken away. What he is saying is bluntly putting it. Either you are with me or against me. (delusion of power)
      I personally find it revolting to even think that he has just said something like that and certainly proves he can't handle the pressure, the current political blunders or even his useless minister f**ckin up at every step of the way. Anyways, we will see what surfaces next... Keep watching...