Major advantages of zooms. 1. Get the right zoom for what you do and maybe never need another lens. 2. You can use a zoom to fill your sensor. Better than losing those precious pixels to post photo cropping. 3. You can take shots at a lot of different focal lengths within seconds (ie no lens swapping - time and exposing your gear to the elements). Decide later which is best. 4. Yes, they are more than practical. In some cases it's get the shot at a decent focal length or totally miss out! Zoom distortion? 1. That's an out of date claim by many years. Editing software has had auto lens correction for years. Just nominate your lens and the software does the rest. 2. We now have in body lens correction for jpegs. Done before you get to your editor! Bokeh? LOL Don't need F1.8 to get that! There's plenty of other ways I've used for 40 years. There's even a great video on it too. Sorry, I didn't keep the website details. Heavy? Had one of them back in the 1980s. My current 24-240 weighs 750g! Very light. 122mm long when compacted. One advantage of mirrorless. IQ With lens correction and mirrorless format the difference between a prime and zoom is very narrow and sometimes non-existent. Unlikely to see differences unless you are prepared to pay for say a Canon L series lens. Even then, only you might see the difference! Look at real samples online for any zoom you wish to consider. Especially mirrorless. You may get a very pleasant surprise. Low light? Huge advances in technology mean that noise at higher ISOs is disappearing. Another video proves with sample shots that 100-400 ISO is fine. Even pushing a bit beyond that may still be acceptable. Another video claims there is NO difference between 100 to 400. Sample photos prove it! With film I used to always use flash inside and outside. Gave me a constant white balance, better contrast, better shadows and more colour vibrant shots. With variable ISO on digital I sort of moved away from that. Bought an RP (very happy) So needed a flash. The Speedlight has impressed me. Nothing like old flash guns I used. Same exposure across a long range of distances in the one shot and little / soft shadows. Impressive. So - Have you been using your zoom correctly? 10-15 years ago, maybe not. I've always been aware of their limitations and shot within them. Today? Technology has moved on and makes the traditional differences not worthy of worrying about. So sorry, mate, no offence intended. The claims and solutions have pretty much come and gone.
I don’t feel offended at all. I respect every photographer’s way of working. If it works for you, then that’s all that matters. My video is based on years of experience shooting fashion and weddings worldwide. In recent years, I’ve been conducting many workshops in collaboration with Canon, where I help aspiring photographers get their photography businesses off the ground when they feel stuck or things aren’t working out. In a large number of cases, I find that photographers struggle to discover their style and identity as a photographer. If you can’t find that for yourself, it won’t be clear to your potential clients either. A lack of consistency and an overemphasis on technical aspects are common reasons things don’t work out, such as using a zoom lens at 40 different focal lengths. In that whole process, people often forget that you shouldn’t be looking at the camera, but through it. That’s why I find it important to teach photographers, from my perspective, how to get closer to themselves. Once again, thanks for your feedback, your response, and for taking the time to watch the video. It’s greatly appreciated, mate 👊🏽
@@royvanderwens Thanks but you've missed the major point. Your comments on zooms are out of date. As for taking photos. I could not agree more with your philosophies. I won awards back in my film days using a SLR with just one lens: 55mm. Current cameras just make life a lot easier. Composition is still the key. Yes consistency helps. That's why I used flash at weddings inside and out. No white balance back then. Flash provided an equivalent instead. That made manual processing of colour prints far easier too.
Switching from zoom to prime was one of the scariest decisions I’ve ever made, but I wouldn’t go back. Sticking to one focal length adds so much more to my work-or two, depending on the assignment.
I've been using zooms for 40 years. I started with primes in the 1970s. Even bought a major brand 'nifty fifty'. It was no better than my zoom at 50mm. Never again.
First of all, thank you for taking the time to watch the video. I’m sorry if it felt like a waste of your time. Second, I get the sense that you might be going through a tough time. If you’d like, I’m here to talk and offer some support. I don’t want you to feel this way.
You chose to watch the video, so if you feel it was a waste of time, that’s on you. This video is packed with valuable photography knowledge, just like all of his videos.
Excellent video. I think the main take-away here (that maybe you should have emphasised a bit more) is: Treat your zoom lens as a collection of 3-4 primes that you have with you. Set it to e.g. 35mm and then go out and shoot, zoom with your legs, look for interesting compositions at that focal length. Only when you really feel the need to grab another prime and change lenses, well, you won't have to do that, you can just set your zoom lens to 24mm, 50mm, 85mm, 105mm (yes, I have the 24-105) and without even touching your camera bag, you now have another "prime" on your camera. But if you keep zooming in and out to frame a shot, you're shooting 4+ lenses at the same time and the results are usually quite uninspiring.
You are absolutely right. It occurred to me even more after the video that it’s essentially a multitude of prime lenses in one. However, I’m still a big fan of prime lenses for several reasons that a zoom lens can’t match. I might make another video diving deeper into this topic based on feedback like yours, so thank you for that, and for watching the video!
Please do make a video on prime vs zoom lenses, a couple (some sarcastic) thoughts here (just my personal opinions, of course), because that topic has been done a lot already. - Primes are better for low light performance (well, yes but only if you shoot at high apertures, f/1.2 , 1.4,... depth of field will be like a meter and a half though.) - Primes produce epic bokeh (yes, that is true, no argument there. No way you could do that at f/4.) - Primes are lighter to carry around for travel / documentary / landscape. (One prime is lighter than a zoom for sure, but 4-5 primes will be a lot heavier than one zoom.) - Primes are sharper (No. Unless you're shooting test cards, every piece of glass built in the past 20 years will out-resolve the sensor on your camera if you know how to use it.) What I use is a 16mm 2.8 (when I can't zoom with my legs, because I'm already standing with the back against a wall or on the edge off a cliff), 35mm 1.8 (low light or night street, some macro, and the occasional muh bokeh), 24-105 zoom that lives 95% of the time on my camera. For personal and professional use. Anyway, just my thoughts, you do a great job, Roy. Looking forward to more videos from you. Cheers!
Zooms are just less restrictive. You don't have to be at a specific focal length, that's what people have conditioned you to think looks nice, you choose the focal length that works best and looks best to you. i don't like primes because they limit what you can do, especially because your phone has prime lenses.. and to me, I can only take a few types of photos until I've run out of compositions, because I don't have a tighter focal lenght, or wide, and that slows you down a LOT. Sure, they have a faster aperture, but you really don't need all of that bokeh. For every damn shot.
I appreciate you have watched the video and sharing your opinion. I understand your perspective, but as you’ve seen in my video, I don’t entirely agree. I know that the photographer is the only limitation of a lens. In every workshop I give for Canon, I emphasize to aspiring photographers that technology isn’t the bottleneck in their work, it’s their mindset and approach. That being said, if this works for you, who am I to judge? Keep doing your thing and turn it into a wonderful career, brother. 💪🏽 Thanks again for watching. 🙏🏽
@royvanderwens its a well made video, but, we all have opinions :) I believe that photographer, scene and gear matter, prime lenses are just not my thing.. and some photos have a specific focal length that hit just right, that might not be 35mm, or 50mm, or any other predetermined focal length.. but tbh, the point you make about being consistent can be very nice and satisfying.. so there's that
I would agree on knowing the focal length to know what crearive capability that focal length brings. Simply staying comfortable where you stand and zooming in and out makes the shot boring in my opinion.
Just think of the zoom lens as several primes which each you can fine tune. Problem solved. For example I divide my 28-45mm (f1.8 by the way 😉) into 28mm, 35mm and 45mm and use it accordingly. For wider shots I go 28mm, to shoot what ever flies my way it's 35mm and for more intimate shots 45mm.
@royvanderwens It's more that it helps me consider each focal length strength and weakness. Examples: At 28mm, the exaggeration of facial features and the forground. At 45mm f1.8, I have to be particularly mindful of the thin depth of field. Each focal length creates as well a different connection to the portrait person.
@k1k13004 In the end, that totally depends on your style, and the 28-70mm f2 has a lot going on for it as a more versatile alternative. I prefer, however, the rendering of the Sigma and indeed for me it covers most of my needs. Before I was using a lot a 40mm and a 35mm lens, using each depending on the context with the wish at times to go a bit wider. The 50-70mm range was never my thing. When I go longer I prefer 85mm and an aperture of at least f1.4, to blow out the environment. It provides a lot more flexibility when the background is cluttered and can't be changed or if I really want to focus on what the person is doing. I don't care too much about the weight, but I can understand if people do. This lens isn't light, but it's so far the lens I like the most and I tried my fair share. Prime lenses always leave me somewhat frustrated with their lack of flexibility and zooms with their lack of wide aperture. This lens fixes that for me.
The problem with zoom lenses is that there is no way to lock the focal length except for maybe at the widest setting on some lenses; which in-turn results in shots with many random focal lengths with creates an inconsistent look. Even if you set a zoom lens at one of the written focal lengths, the zoom will lose its position and drift.
For that reason and many more, I shoot prime. I didn’t say it in the video, but it was something I later thought of: it would be great if the lens clicked into these positions. On the other hand, it is the responsibility of the photographer, not the lens designer.
Explanation starts at 4:17 . This video is a waste of time. TLDV -> He sais "use your zoom lens like multiple prime lenses and stick to known focal lenght and not inbetweens".
I know we live in a time of 3-second videos, but sometimes you need context to make a point. If I had just said, ‘only set your zoom lens to the marked focal lengths,’ it would not have been a solid argument.
@@royvanderwensdisagree. You wasted time and didn’t have an interesting enough of a video to make something longer than 30 seconds. I almost clicked out until I saw this comment. Also this isn’t that useful of advice tbh. It’s just your feeling about things and doesn’t really account for the 100’s of different applications of zoom lenses outside of weddings and portraits. Also look at cinema lenses, there are tons of non traditional focal lengths people use all the time. My favorite focal lengths are 32,40 & 65. All non traditional but Cooke Leica and Arri all make b-set focal lengths with these sets. Moral of the story, don’t box yourself in because someone told you so
clickbait title and then a history lesson. I'm at minute 3 and the direction does not even come close to matching the title. But it's my own fault, I should stop clicking on these stupid titles.
I really regret that you’re giving such a reaction, and I’ll explain why. I give workshops in collaboration with Canon; they hire me because of my technical knowledge and experience as a photographer. This TH-cam video is also part of the theoretical section of my workshop. The workshop is designed to teach photographers how to balance technique and emotion to advance their careers. When I explain this, photographers are always very enthusiastic, and it opens up a whole new world for them.They need to hear my entire story, and if you were to listen to it in full, the explanation I give at the beginning about a small piece of history would make perfect sense. I don’t create clickbait titles; I make content that is genuinely valuable for aspiring and even experienced photographers. You just need to give me the time to explain things so you can improve. Yes I create a thumbnail that looks interesting, because the algorithm wants me to! In the end, I can’t decide what you do or don’t want to watch, that’s entirely up to you. I appreciate that you watched my video, and hopefully, I’ll see you next time! 😊
@@royvanderwens To say it directly in the title that everyone has been using their zoom lens wrong for years is the purest form of clickbait. It's the only reason I clicked on the video and not because of the boring content that everyone who has been taking photos for more than 3 days knows. If you can't shine with content (which will definitely get the word out and generate clicks on its own) then you have to come up with blatant clickbait garbage.
It’s interesting that you clicked on my video, watched multiple minutes of it, and are still here commenting. If the content was truly as “boring” and “obvious” as you claim, wouldn’t you have clicked away immediately instead of engaging this much? I create content that genuinely helps photographers improve, and many appreciate the insights I share. If it wasn’t useful to you, that’s totally fine, everyone’s at a different level. But the fact that you’re this invested in my “clickbait garbage” suggests that maybe, just maybe, the title did exactly what it was supposed to do: get your attention. 😉 That said, I appreciate the engagement! Comments like yours only help the video reach more people who might actually benefit from it. Have a great day! 😊
📸 Struggling with flash photography? Here’s a free 3-part video course.
th-cam.com/play/PLY5TTwwpemAafmhFYdlYQbhKtRi2lsGYp.html
Major advantages of zooms.
1. Get the right zoom for what you do and maybe never need another lens.
2. You can use a zoom to fill your sensor. Better than losing those precious pixels to post photo cropping.
3. You can take shots at a lot of different focal lengths within seconds (ie no lens swapping - time and exposing your gear to the elements). Decide later which is best.
4. Yes, they are more than practical. In some cases it's get the shot at a decent focal length or totally miss out!
Zoom distortion?
1. That's an out of date claim by many years. Editing software has had auto lens correction for years. Just nominate your lens and the software does the rest.
2. We now have in body lens correction for jpegs. Done before you get to your editor!
Bokeh?
LOL Don't need F1.8 to get that! There's plenty of other ways I've used for 40 years. There's even a great video on it too. Sorry, I didn't keep the website details.
Heavy?
Had one of them back in the 1980s. My current 24-240 weighs 750g! Very light. 122mm long when compacted. One advantage of mirrorless.
IQ
With lens correction and mirrorless format the difference between a prime and zoom is very narrow and sometimes non-existent. Unlikely to see differences unless you are prepared to pay for say a Canon L series lens. Even then, only you might see the difference!
Look at real samples online for any zoom you wish to consider. Especially mirrorless. You may get a very pleasant surprise.
Low light?
Huge advances in technology mean that noise at higher ISOs is disappearing. Another video proves with sample shots that 100-400 ISO is fine. Even pushing a bit beyond that may still be acceptable. Another video claims there is NO difference between 100 to 400. Sample photos prove it!
With film I used to always use flash inside and outside. Gave me a constant white balance, better contrast, better shadows and more colour vibrant shots. With variable ISO on digital I sort of moved away from that. Bought an RP (very happy) So needed a flash. The Speedlight has impressed me. Nothing like old flash guns I used. Same exposure across a long range of distances in the one shot and little / soft shadows. Impressive.
So - Have you been using your zoom correctly?
10-15 years ago, maybe not. I've always been aware of their limitations and shot within them.
Today? Technology has moved on and makes the traditional differences not worthy of worrying about.
So sorry, mate, no offence intended. The claims and solutions have pretty much come and gone.
I don’t feel offended at all. I respect every photographer’s way of working. If it works for you, then that’s all that matters.
My video is based on years of experience shooting fashion and weddings worldwide. In recent years, I’ve been conducting many workshops in collaboration with Canon, where I help aspiring photographers get their photography businesses off the ground when they feel stuck or things aren’t working out. In a large number of cases, I find that photographers struggle to discover their style and identity as a photographer. If you can’t find that for yourself, it won’t be clear to your potential clients either. A lack of consistency and an overemphasis on technical aspects are common reasons things don’t work out, such as using a zoom lens at 40 different focal lengths. In that whole process, people often forget that you shouldn’t be looking at the camera, but through it.
That’s why I find it important to teach photographers, from my perspective, how to get closer to themselves.
Once again, thanks for your feedback, your response, and for taking the time to watch the video. It’s greatly appreciated, mate 👊🏽
@@royvanderwens Thanks but you've missed the major point. Your comments on zooms are out of date.
As for taking photos. I could not agree more with your philosophies. I won awards back in my film days using a SLR with just one lens: 55mm. Current cameras just make life a lot easier. Composition is still the key.
Yes consistency helps. That's why I used flash at weddings inside and out. No white balance back then. Flash provided an equivalent instead. That made manual processing of colour prints far easier too.
Switching from zoom to prime was one of the scariest decisions I’ve ever made, but I wouldn’t go back. Sticking to one focal length adds so much more to my work-or two, depending on the assignment.
I hear you! I had exactly the same thing. No I only use zoom lenses for TH-cam videos.
I've been using zooms for 40 years. I started with primes in the 1970s. Even bought a major brand 'nifty fifty'. It was no better than my zoom at 50mm. Never again.
HORRIBLE VIDEO
you wasted 6 minutes from my life and just spewd nonsense
Explain?
First of all, thank you for taking the time to watch the video. I’m sorry if it felt like a waste of your time. Second, I get the sense that you might be going through a tough time. If you’d like, I’m here to talk and offer some support. I don’t want you to feel this way.
You chose to watch the video, so if you feel it was a waste of time, that’s on you. This video is packed with valuable photography knowledge, just like all of his videos.
Excellent video. I think the main take-away here (that maybe you should have emphasised a bit more) is: Treat your zoom lens as a collection of 3-4 primes that you have with you. Set it to e.g. 35mm and then go out and shoot, zoom with your legs, look for interesting compositions at that focal length. Only when you really feel the need to grab another prime and change lenses, well, you won't have to do that, you can just set your zoom lens to 24mm, 50mm, 85mm, 105mm (yes, I have the 24-105) and without even touching your camera bag, you now have another "prime" on your camera. But if you keep zooming in and out to frame a shot, you're shooting 4+ lenses at the same time and the results are usually quite uninspiring.
You are absolutely right. It occurred to me even more after the video that it’s essentially a multitude of prime lenses in one. However, I’m still a big fan of prime lenses for several reasons that a zoom lens can’t match. I might make another video diving deeper into this topic based on feedback like yours, so thank you for that, and for watching the video!
Please do make a video on prime vs zoom lenses, a couple (some sarcastic) thoughts here (just my personal opinions, of course), because that topic has been done a lot already.
- Primes are better for low light performance (well, yes but only if you shoot at high apertures, f/1.2 , 1.4,... depth of field will be like a meter and a half though.)
- Primes produce epic bokeh (yes, that is true, no argument there. No way you could do that at f/4.)
- Primes are lighter to carry around for travel / documentary / landscape. (One prime is lighter than a zoom for sure, but 4-5 primes will be a lot heavier than one zoom.)
- Primes are sharper (No. Unless you're shooting test cards, every piece of glass built in the past 20 years will out-resolve the sensor on your camera if you know how to use it.)
What I use is a 16mm 2.8 (when I can't zoom with my legs, because I'm already standing with the back against a wall or on the edge off a cliff), 35mm 1.8 (low light or night street, some macro, and the occasional muh bokeh), 24-105 zoom that lives 95% of the time on my camera. For personal and professional use.
Anyway, just my thoughts, you do a great job, Roy. Looking forward to more videos from you. Cheers!
That is a great idea and fantastic input., I'm writing it down and going to think about a good video!
Background music too loud. Could not hear you. Stopped wtaching.
Hmm strange, I put a lot of effort into audio ducking, and didn't have any other complaints. Well better luck next time 😊
I shoot my 24-70 2.8 just like this ever since I got it, thought it was just me, good to se somebody make a video about this technique
Great to hear you are you using it this way 💪
Zooms are just less restrictive. You don't have to be at a specific focal length, that's what people have conditioned you to think looks nice, you choose the focal length that works best and looks best to you. i don't like primes because they limit what you can do, especially because your phone has prime lenses.. and to me, I can only take a few types of photos until I've run out of compositions, because I don't have a tighter focal lenght, or wide, and that slows you down a LOT. Sure, they have a faster aperture, but you really don't need all of that bokeh. For every damn shot.
I appreciate you have watched the video and sharing your opinion.
I understand your perspective, but as you’ve seen in my video, I don’t entirely agree.
I know that the photographer is the only limitation of a lens.
In every workshop I give for Canon, I emphasize to aspiring photographers that technology isn’t the bottleneck in their work, it’s their mindset and approach.
That being said, if this works for you, who am I to judge? Keep doing your thing and turn it into a wonderful career, brother. 💪🏽
Thanks again for watching. 🙏🏽
@royvanderwens its a well made video, but, we all have opinions :)
I believe that photographer, scene and gear matter, prime lenses are just not my thing.. and some photos have a specific focal length that hit just right, that might not be 35mm, or 50mm, or any other predetermined focal length.. but tbh, the point you make about being consistent can be very nice and satisfying.. so there's that
I'll take that 😃 Thanks again for watching, much appreciated!
I would agree on knowing the focal length to know what crearive capability that focal length brings. Simply staying comfortable where you stand and zooming in and out makes the shot boring in my opinion.
Absolutely agree with you. Composing a shot by using your body and angle makes the shots much more interesting.
Just think of the zoom lens as several primes which each you can fine tune. Problem solved. For example I divide my 28-45mm (f1.8 by the way 😉) into 28mm, 35mm and 45mm and use it accordingly. For wider shots I go 28mm, to shoot what ever flies my way it's 35mm and for more intimate shots 45mm.
That is a really good way of working with it! Does it give you more peace of mind knowing you don’t have the zoom constantly?
@royvanderwens It's more that it helps me consider each focal length strength and weakness. Examples: At 28mm, the exaggeration of facial features and the forground. At 45mm f1.8, I have to be particularly mindful of the thin depth of field. Each focal length creates as well a different connection to the portrait person.
But you would never ever buy 35 and 45. This is not even a 2x zoom. It's expensive and heavy
@k1k13004 In the end, that totally depends on your style, and the 28-70mm f2 has a lot going on for it as a more versatile alternative. I prefer, however, the rendering of the Sigma and indeed for me it covers most of my needs. Before I was using a lot a 40mm and a 35mm lens, using each depending on the context with the wish at times to go a bit wider. The 50-70mm range was never my thing. When I go longer I prefer 85mm and an aperture of at least f1.4, to blow out the environment. It provides a lot more flexibility when the background is cluttered and can't be changed or if I really want to focus on what the person is doing. I don't care too much about the weight, but I can understand if people do. This lens isn't light, but it's so far the lens I like the most and I tried my fair share. Prime lenses always leave me somewhat frustrated with their lack of flexibility and zooms with their lack of wide aperture. This lens fixes that for me.
@@maggnet4829 1kg and this price is too much for even not 2x. There is a canon f2 lens but it's canon.... And sony as well. Waiting for L mount
The problem with zoom lenses is that there is no way to lock the focal length except for maybe at the widest setting on some lenses; which in-turn results in shots with many random focal lengths with creates an inconsistent look. Even if you set a zoom lens at one of the written focal lengths, the zoom will lose its position and drift.
For that reason and many more, I shoot prime. I didn’t say it in the video, but it was something I later thought of: it would be great if the lens clicked into these positions. On the other hand, it is the responsibility of the photographer, not the lens designer.
Explanation starts at 4:17 . This video is a waste of time. TLDV -> He sais "use your zoom lens like multiple prime lenses and stick to known focal lenght and not inbetweens".
Come on, Josh, we discussed that you would make a full chapter list!
Thank you. As soon as I heard “the history of the zoom lens” I thought, oh no it’s one of thooose videos…
I know we live in a time of 3-second videos, but sometimes you need context to make a point. If I had just said, ‘only set your zoom lens to the marked focal lengths,’ it would not have been a solid argument.
@@royvanderwensdisagree. You wasted time and didn’t have an interesting enough of a video to make something longer than 30 seconds. I almost clicked out until I saw this comment. Also this isn’t that useful of advice tbh. It’s just your feeling about things and doesn’t really account for the 100’s of different applications of zoom lenses outside of weddings and portraits. Also look at cinema lenses, there are tons of non traditional focal lengths people use all the time. My favorite focal lengths are 32,40 & 65. All non traditional but Cooke Leica and Arri all make b-set focal lengths with these sets. Moral of the story, don’t box yourself in because someone told you so
Nice video Roy!
Thank Rens!
the moment you started about the history. you lost me.
Imagine having some context to build up your argument 😜
clickbait title and then a history lesson. I'm at minute 3 and the direction does not even come close to matching the title. But it's my own fault, I should stop clicking on these stupid titles.
I really regret that you’re giving such a reaction, and I’ll explain why. I give workshops in collaboration with Canon; they hire me because of my technical knowledge and experience as a photographer.
This TH-cam video is also part of the theoretical section of my workshop. The workshop is designed to teach photographers how to balance technique and emotion to advance their careers.
When I explain this, photographers are always very enthusiastic, and it opens up a whole new world for them.They need to hear my entire story, and if you were to listen to it in full, the explanation I give at the beginning about a small piece of history would make perfect sense.
I don’t create clickbait titles; I make content that is genuinely valuable for aspiring and even experienced photographers. You just need to give me the time to explain things so you can improve. Yes I create a thumbnail that looks interesting, because the algorithm wants me to!
In the end, I can’t decide what you do or don’t want to watch, that’s entirely up to you. I appreciate that you watched my video, and hopefully, I’ll see you next time! 😊
@@royvanderwens To say it directly in the title that everyone has been using their zoom lens wrong for years is the purest form of clickbait. It's the only reason I clicked on the video and not because of the boring content that everyone who has been taking photos for more than 3 days knows. If you can't shine with content (which will definitely get the word out and generate clicks on its own) then you have to come up with blatant clickbait garbage.
It’s interesting that you clicked on my video, watched multiple minutes of it, and are still here commenting. If the content was truly as “boring” and “obvious” as you claim, wouldn’t you have clicked away immediately instead of engaging this much?
I create content that genuinely helps photographers improve, and many appreciate the insights I share. If it wasn’t useful to you, that’s totally fine, everyone’s at a different level. But the fact that you’re this invested in my “clickbait garbage” suggests that maybe, just maybe, the title did exactly what it was supposed to do: get your attention. 😉
That said, I appreciate the engagement! Comments like yours only help the video reach more people who might actually benefit from it. Have a great day! 😊
Who is that hot Guy? He looks good
It’s your colleague working next to you, you idiot. Haha!
hahaha
Thanks for sharing