im a hammer fan....but ......i am a 90s bowler....so i have a power torq, a cuda, and am waiting unpatiently for the piranha to return. and the 300 company is always on my list to check when new things come out. maybe a crush/r .....im ordering a few more for the bag from this great company.
Nick, I enjoy your content, and like what you do with Phil. Anyways, for this year i have an arsenal in mind and would like your input. 1. Black window 2.0 hybrid 2. Hammer purple reactive 3. Envy Tour 4. Cuda pearl 5. My trusty Incognito solid 6. Keep my short pin counter attack pearl or buy the sneak attack, either one. Thoughts, please Thanks!
As of right now I only have one Columbia ball, the Cuda Powercore Solid, great ball, but does need some friction. Looks like the Altas would be a great step up. I am revamping my arsenal to include mostly a selection of all the Brunswick line. I am becoming disenfranchised with a competitor’s brand. Now I’m on the fence between the Atlas and the Track Archetype. Would it be redundant to have both? Keep up the great content Nick.
@@brunsnick I am trying to build a versatile arsenal on the premise of ball motion and filling those slots with the 3 major categories Traction, Angular and Continuous. The Katana Strike falls into a Traction type motion and the Atlas is more of a Continuous motion. I have been bowling on fairly heavy oil patterns, not the typical house shot, so these two balls seem to have more shape than most big asyms. Thank you Nick for sharing your knowledge.
@brunsnick What's the difference between the? The kuda pearl. And the sheath pearl?I have the envy tour ,and the explosion, looking for something pearl to compete my arsenal.
@@djbobbylow270 if you lean towards being on the speed dominate side, go with the Stealth. If you are more rev matched or leaning towards being rev dominant, go with the Cuda. But really you cant go wrong with either. The Cuda is more skid/flip by comparison whereas the Stealth wants to rev up sooner and give a slightly smoother and more continuous type reaction.
@vance836 thanks I normally like smoother balls because I have a medium Rev rate atabout 16 to 17 mph, where I don't have a problem with getting the ball to turn the corner
Cool video talk tech bowling bowling ball
Most useful information! Thank you, Nick.
Man, that Columbia line is impressive. The local staffer totally talked me into that Atlas. Love the look of that Cuda, it's b-e-a-utiful.
im a hammer fan....but ......i am a 90s bowler....so i have a power torq, a cuda, and am waiting unpatiently for the piranha to return. and the 300 company is always on my list to check when new things come out. maybe a crush/r .....im ordering a few more for the bag from this great company.
Great series Nick. Looking forward to more of these. Greatly appreciated.
Nick just showing more that he’s regional ready 😁
You stop it 🤣
@@brunsnick I believe there is a regional next weekend just down the road from you at spectrum lanes buddy, better shoe up.
@@brendensramek7440 I should just bring all purple hammers on the long pattern while I still can in the PBA.
@@brunsnick 😂😂 might as well be that guy with 6 different ones with fresh 180-500 to use a fresh one every other game, unbeatable!
I wish you could do a video comparing the Atlas to the Speed! I’m wondering how big a difference there is between the two.
Nick, I enjoy your content, and like what you do with Phil.
Anyways, for this year i have an arsenal in mind and would like your input.
1. Black window 2.0 hybrid
2. Hammer purple reactive
3. Envy Tour
4. Cuda pearl
5. My trusty Incognito solid
6. Keep my short pin counter attack pearl or buy the sneak attack, either one.
Thoughts, please
Thanks!
I think that’s a good mix of covers and cores to be effective with multiple angles.
@@brunsnick
Appreciate the reply, Nick.
@brunsnick ~ anything else to suggest? Speed:17 +;rev rate around 400
@@jynx1395 Purple Hammer.
As of right now I only have one Columbia ball, the Cuda Powercore Solid, great ball, but does need some friction. Looks like the Altas would be a great step up. I am revamping my arsenal to include mostly a selection of all the Brunswick line. I am becoming disenfranchised with a competitor’s brand. Now I’m on the fence between the Atlas and the Track Archetype. Would it be redundant to have both? Keep up the great content Nick.
Yeah most don’t need to asym solids up top. Archetype is stronger for me.
@@brunsnick I am trying to build a versatile arsenal on the premise of ball motion and filling those slots with the 3 major categories Traction, Angular and Continuous. The Katana Strike falls into a Traction type motion and the Atlas is more of a Continuous motion. I have been bowling on fairly heavy oil patterns, not the typical house shot, so these two balls seem to have more shape than most big asyms. Thank you Nick for sharing your knowledge.
@brunsnick What's the difference between the? The kuda pearl. And the sheath pearl?I have the envy tour ,and the explosion, looking for something pearl to compete my arsenal.
Stealth has a stronger core compared to Cuda. More flare. More hook potential. Same type of reaction shape.
@brinsnick Thanks I'm undecided
@@djbobbylow270 if you lean towards being on the speed dominate side, go with the Stealth. If you are more rev matched or leaning towards being rev dominant, go with the Cuda. But really you cant go wrong with either. The Cuda is more skid/flip by comparison whereas the Stealth wants to rev up sooner and give a slightly smoother and more continuous type reaction.
@vance836 thanks I normally like smoother balls because I have a medium Rev rate atabout 16 to 17 mph, where I don't have a problem with getting the ball to turn the corner
No madness :(((!
🤷🏻♂️
@@brunsnick no hate, madness is just the only ball I have, your madness is still in recovery from what you put it through in your surface challenge 😂.
It needs a few minutes on the Haus resurfacer for sure. It’s not happy. 🤣