Mini backpacking stoves - BRS-3000 vs. the Fire Maple FMS-300T

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ก.ค. 2024
  • I compare the performance of the BRS-3000 stove with the Fire Maple FMS-300T
    They have nearly identical performance. Both consume 5 g of fuel to boil a cup of water in just over 2:00 minutes. That's about 150 g/hour, which is better that their advertised rate of 185g/h.
    0:00 Introduction
    0:22 Comparing the two stoves
    4:30 First boil test
    7:16 Second boil test
    9:27 Third boil test
    11:25 Final thoughts
    #firemaple #Backpacking #stoves
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 18

  • @draekko_
    @draekko_ 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Thanks for the comparison, i'd go with the firemaple for the beefier construction if i had to go ultralight LOL

  • @turtlewolfpack6061
    @turtlewolfpack6061 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I have had the BRS for a few years now and haven't used it as much as you likely have but I haven't had any issues with bent arms myself. For the $15 CAD I spent on it I really can't fault it at all.

  • @alpineearth
    @alpineearth 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great review! love the boil times. I have been curious about that. Haven't done it myself yet. I have used two FMS stoves. Both were mounted crooked to the base. They sent me the second one when the first was crooked. Also the Firemaple leaked my whole canister into the bear locker overnight despite me closing the valve. I keep the canister attached if I am just going to use the stove again in the morning. I've been using the BRS for a few years now and never had any issues. My other Firemaple stove is awesome. I love it. FMS 116T.

    • @Martyupnorth
      @Martyupnorth  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks for the great feedback.

  • @drpwnage23
    @drpwnage23 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks for doing a comparison between these two, I'll plan on buying some kind of smaller stove for the next season. The arms on the fire maple are a bit stronger like you said but they look like they get a lot hotter than the brs which has its arms more spread out and out of the way of the flame. I'm currently leaning towards getting a SOTO Amicus over these two, though it is substantially more expensive

  • @travisvanalst4698
    @travisvanalst4698 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The best stove is the one you can afford, works well, and is reliable. I e had an off name one for 4 years now and it works like the day I first got it.

  • @sorinoutdoors5418
    @sorinoutdoors5418 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good video comparing these two, I have the BRS 3000 and the 750ml Toaks cup for more than 5yrs. they are great, no deformation on my BRS. Not sure why someone would pick Fire Maple Stove, less performance, double the price and almost double the weight!?

  • @hughmongus211
    @hughmongus211 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nice video.

  • @redlightchorzow
    @redlightchorzow 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have a question that has been bothering me for a long time and I can't find the answer. On the one hand, I keep reading/hearing that the cartridge should not be exposed to high temperatures. On the other hand, the burner (especially the one screwed onto the cartridge) heats up to very high temperatures and is in direct contact with the cartridge. The problem especially concerns small burners from China, such as the BSR3000. I always have concerns and fear in the back of my mind. Please explain.

    • @coachhannah2403
      @coachhannah2403 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

      The solution is that Ti is not a great conductor of heat, so the heat does not conduct down to the canister.
      People also have way overstated the problem with chimney/windscreen heating the canister. My experimental experience is that BRS with chimney and 900 mL of water will boil fine without heating the canister. I use minimum setting, so it takes just slightly longer but is also quieter. Note my set-up has a vented deflector plate between flame and canister.

  • @lawsnewton
    @lawsnewton 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Seems like the burner might handle wind a bit better.

  • @user-tp2ym5bg5f
    @user-tp2ym5bg5f 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    どちらが、オススメですか?

  • @scottlamoureux1064
    @scottlamoureux1064 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video, thanks for putting it together. I want to do a similar test with my Jet Boil to see if the heat exchanger design improves efficiency. It sure seems to, but your results are similar to what I anecdotally get in the field (about 4-5 days per small canister).

    • @Martyupnorth
      @Martyupnorth  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The JetBoil is definitely fast and efficient. I just find it too bug and bulky.

  • @lawsnewton
    @lawsnewton 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The BRS or other knock of burner stoves just work and are so light.
    You just keep an eye on the wear of the store, buy and pack a spare if you think the stove is getting a bit out of spec.
    Campers could roll with 2 and probably not notice the weight and they're almost pocketchange to buy.

    • @Martyupnorth
      @Martyupnorth  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They're hard to beat. I feel the same way about inexpensive, off brand gear, especially if it's not critical. I'm tired of paying just fro brand names, especially when they don't offer good after sales service.

    • @coachhannah2403
      @coachhannah2403 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I do carry a spare BRS in my emergency kit. I had one break 4 years ago (main body of stove broke with a pot on it). My current-design chimney/windscreen supports the pot now so that 'shouldn't happen.'

  • @purple-nq3zd
    @purple-nq3zd 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nothing like cooking on an open fire. For years I took my kids camping on a single mum's buget and I always cooked on an open fire. Best spaghetti sauce ever!!! Lol