Watched the movie today and I liked it. But I think there were a lot of logical errors in the movie(maybe because I couldn't understand all the Tamil dialogues) Following are some of the issues i observed 1) Sarath Kumar deciding that the killings are done by a serial killer after the second murder itself and that the victims are not related to the murderer. 2) Guessing the age of the murderer 3) Prakash trying to find the person who read a book which contains information regarding pressure points(the person could have bought the book or borrowed it from someone else or got it from a different library or learnt it from someone else). This I felt was the most logically flawed scene. 4)The villain not killing Kennedy. If anyone knows the logic behind these scenes. Please do explain.
1. Bec that killing pattern is same and the victims are not related to anyother victim ... They are randomly picked .... 2. Age is guessed by average age of the victims killed by murderer... 3.maybe... but on that time he was too young and not having the capacity to buy the books because of his dad's behaviour.... on that time he wasn't travelled too much distance to read that one bec of he have lack of transport facilities on 1960s.... 4. Yeah he didn't wanted to killed him.. because he is inspired by Kennedy in earlier days to kill others with zero evidences...he just try to replica Kennedy....
@@raajesh12345 guessing the age of the murderer only on the basis of the age of victims isn't logical. Why can't the murderer be in the 20's or 30s? Regarding the book, it's really absurd that Prakash thinks that the murderer would have gained knowledge about the pressure points from that particular book from that particular library only. What I am saying is there are several possibilities and the police officer concludes that the murderer would have got the information from that particular book from that particular library only. The villain wanted to kill in the same way as Kennedy did because it didn't leave behind clues, but by leaving Kennedy alive a clue is being left behind
@@altairfreak7144 @altairfreak7144 @altairfreak7144 he is too young guy and killing the old women like above 40 is easy to him compared to young girls.. and also his first kill is his teacher she also 40 plus age , he just maintained his pattern of kill... They clearly mentioned in this film that prakash did the conversation with the doctor who did the postmortem of the victims... He only told to prakash that he gained knowledge in books because of its 1960... particular Library maybe a no answer question..... Second villain leave the first one . Bec he is the inspiration for the first one .. he is not willing to kill him... He just wanted to kill those 20+ aged chubby cheek women like his wife...
Yesterday Watched in Trichy- Star Theatre. Movie most horrible than Ratchasan. It's best to avoid Night show, not to take Childrens. One of the best movie.
Plz clarify - 1. In second of the movie , police will caught one person who accepts of the crime and surrender and he also dies the next morning while taking to court. Is tat was done by the police dept to close the case??? 2. In the first half , Sarath Kumar will be shown beaten marks in his back. What that signify and any thing to tell abt Sarath Kumar??
He said on the scene of explaining crime when ashok selvan kneels down before him, that he left no evidence of crime, why he did not dispose the body was no one could find the criminal with a deadbody bcz he did the crime in a clean and organised way. When he goes to kennedy house he sees he is too organised in handling even the coffee cup, bookshelf and even those photos. He gets a minor doubt abt him, then the last crime happened before 10 yrs stopped in the year kennedy got married , so he concludes kennedy is the killer
முழு கதையும் சொல்லிட்டிங்க இனிமேதான் படம் பாக்கலாம்னு நினைச்சேன் ஒருவேலை படம் பார்த்தா நீங்க பண்ண ரிவீவ் தான் நாபகத்துக்கு வரும் இனிமே முழு கதையும் சொல்லாதிங்க ஒரு டவிஸ்ட் வச்சி சொல்லுங்க
Watched the movie today and I liked it. But I think there were a lot of logical errors in the movie(maybe because I couldn't understand all the Tamil dialogues) Following are some of the issues i observed
1) Sarath Kumar deciding that the killings are done by a serial killer after the second murder itself and that the victims are not related to the murderer.
2) Guessing the age of the murderer
3) Prakash trying to find the person who read a book which contains information regarding pressure points(the person could have bought the book or borrowed it from someone else or got it from a different library or learnt it from someone else). This I felt was the most logically flawed scene.
4)The villain not killing Kennedy.
If anyone knows the logic behind these scenes. Please do explain.
1. Bec that killing pattern is same and the victims are not related to anyother victim ... They are randomly picked ....
2. Age is guessed by average age of the victims killed by murderer...
3.maybe... but on that time he was too young and not having the capacity to buy the books because of his dad's behaviour.... on that time he wasn't travelled too much distance to read that one bec of he have lack of transport facilities on 1960s....
4. Yeah he didn't wanted to killed him.. because he is inspired by Kennedy in earlier days to kill others with zero evidences...he just try to replica Kennedy....
@@raajesh12345 guessing the age of the murderer only on the basis of the age of victims isn't logical. Why can't the murderer be in the 20's or 30s? Regarding the book, it's really absurd that Prakash thinks that the murderer would have gained knowledge about the pressure points from that particular book from that particular library only. What I am saying is there are several possibilities and the police officer concludes that the murderer would have got the information from that particular book from that particular library only. The villain wanted to kill in the same way as Kennedy did because it didn't leave behind clues, but by leaving Kennedy alive a clue is being left behind
@@altairfreak7144 @altairfreak7144 @altairfreak7144 he is too young guy and killing the old women like above 40 is easy to him compared to young girls.. and also his first kill is his teacher she also 40 plus age , he just maintained his pattern of kill...
They clearly mentioned in this film that prakash did the conversation with the doctor who did the postmortem of the victims... He only told to prakash that he gained knowledge in books because of its 1960... particular Library maybe a no answer question.....
Second villain leave the first one . Bec he is the inspiration for the first one .. he is not willing to kill him... He just wanted to kill those 20+ aged chubby cheek women like his wife...
Unaku story solavea therila thampi...konjam improve pannu...karmam....vera story explanation semmaya iruku
Aap explain kar rahe h isase acha to aap youtube pr full movie hindi dubbed daal de
Narration need to be improved
நல்ல கருத்தை சொன்ன திரைப்படத்தை வரவேற்கும் நன்றி வணக்கம்
Yesterday Watched in Trichy- Star Theatre. Movie most horrible than Ratchasan. It's best to avoid Night show, not to take Childrens. One of the best movie.
Ratchasan movie pathirukiya nee
@@mradha1249 😂😂
😂😂😂
You are not strong enough
15:33 15:33 15:36 15:36 15:36
Bro love you abhi web series pannunga bro please
Plz clarify -
1. In second of the movie , police will caught one person who accepts of the crime and surrender and he also dies the next morning while taking to court. Is tat was done by the police dept to close the case???
2. In the first half , Sarath Kumar will be shown beaten marks in his back. What that signify and any thing to tell abt Sarath Kumar??
Sarath kumar also suffered from his father still he became police
Thanks bro.
Any time😍
Can u explain how sarath kumar comes to conclusion sarath babu is culprit even before ashok sevan hint(he calls n tells SK)
30 yrs gap mrg life and dads death 1979
Thank u. May be his intuition
@@ArunKumar-fo9xt villain ean wife ah kollala🤔🤔🤔
@@typicaltamilan4578 sarath Babu Avan appa va kolla mudiyathathu maari...
He said on the scene of explaining crime when ashok selvan kneels down before him, that he left no evidence of crime, why he did not dispose the body was no one could find the criminal with a deadbody bcz he did the crime in a clean and organised way. When he goes to kennedy house he sees he is too organised in handling even the coffee cup, bookshelf and even those photos. He gets a minor doubt abt him, then the last crime happened before 10 yrs stopped in the year kennedy got married , so he concludes kennedy is the killer
Modern love chennai series story
முழு கதையும் சொல்லிட்டிங்க இனிமேதான் படம் பாக்கலாம்னு நினைச்சேன் ஒருவேலை படம் பார்த்தா நீங்க பண்ண ரிவீவ் தான் நாபகத்துக்கு வரும் இனிமே முழு கதையும் சொல்லாதிங்க ஒரு டவிஸ்ட் வச்சி சொல்லுங்க
நீங்க ஏன் வீடியோ-ய பார்த்திங்க ? உங்க ஒருவருக்காக வீடியோய மாத்தி போடனுமா?
@@VasanthKumar_05நண்பா அந்த படத்துக்கு பின்னால் நூற்றுக்கணக்கானோர் உழைப்பு இருக்கிறது அதனால்தான் சொன்னேன்
Motham motham motham
Bro is he killed his wife and her lover?
Deadbody eppadi sagum dead body kiletakkathu solunga
bro sarathu babu chinna vayasula yen ponnungala mattuk kolran
Avar apo school padiparu bro, avarnala pasanga kita fight panni kola pana mudiyadhu adhunala 40years old ladies ah paathu kola panuvaru.
Antha heroine edhuku da wasta
Indha moviela 2nd villian edukaaga kola panra
Avanoda wife ah pidikatha naala
@@raajesh12345 apo wife ah ean kollala???
@@typicaltamilan4578 first psycho vala epd Avan appa va kolla mudiyalayo apd than.... Avan Avan wife ah adika mudiyama thalaganiya potu kuthitu irpan oru scenela...
Avan wife pazhi vanga
90% of the entire movie is from ratasan
Moka padam
Nee padam pathiya first uh😅😅😅