I counted several unsats just on the photos provided of the door assy. Didn’t see any inspection lacquer on any mating brackets or fasteners Bad policy. Also paint was used to fill in gaps
Some were the risk assessment was missed and something wasn't checked on the airplane to make sure its safe to fly. Steps need to be taken and airplane need to be checked more frequently and properly...so people feel safe they want to fly .
bpi 1581 is ridiculously complex, like it was written by lawyers instead of by people that could convey the bpi in laymen terms to shop floor personnel. And this is part of the problem.
The problems were pointed out decades ago when Boeing was caught using an outsourced company in Central America that cut the fuselage parts without using CNC machines, they were using magic markers and rulers. The door have to be fixed because the assemblies are not correct the are all upstream issues so they can "save money" not because people on the floor didn't sign paperwork. There should have been no need of "fixing" anything they should have rejected it and out those doors with wring rivets or placements in the scrap heap. A real quality system and a real CEO behind them is what they need, not excuses.
In this presentation, it is unfortunate that viewgraphs and videos are not shown to the public because they would facilitate the understanding of the various elements. I hope in future presentations this will be remedied. Also, I think the names of the names of the affected "companies" be added to the names of their personnel to establish continueous relationships.
I also believe alot of pilots needs to start doing old school.check themselves not just replying on all gadgets in a airplane and auto pilots .Manual flights , manual flight computers, manual checklists outside the airplane and inside
Staff back m rounds and mechanical check history on the airplane and pick up on the down falls and correct them ...rather than blaming each others and questioning all the times ..something news channels need to get grips with.🫡
Admit faults ..fix them straight away... make sure dont happen again ...and move forward...this int no comedy show its serious business that needs to be addressed and fixed done problems solved!🫡
My solution is have USAF perform oversight on pressure fuselage parts prior to final closure and test
I counted several unsats just on the photos provided of the door assy. Didn’t see any inspection lacquer on any mating brackets or fasteners Bad policy. Also paint was used to fill in gaps
Some were the risk assessment was missed and something wasn't checked on the airplane to make sure its safe to fly. Steps need to be taken and airplane need to be checked more frequently and properly...so people feel safe they want to fly .
This is sad. All sittings need some changing for safety.
So how many junk airplanes are currently flying?
Pressure boundary inspections should be witnessed at installation and documented with procedural step b y step compliance
27 min start
bpi 1581 is ridiculously complex, like it was written by lawyers instead of by people that could convey the bpi in laymen terms to shop floor personnel. And this is part of the problem.
The problems were pointed out decades ago when Boeing was caught using an outsourced company in Central America that cut the fuselage parts without using CNC machines, they were using magic markers and rulers. The door have to be fixed because the assemblies are not correct the are all upstream issues so they can "save money" not because people on the floor didn't sign paperwork. There should have been no need of "fixing" anything they should have rejected it and out those doors with wring rivets or placements in the scrap heap. A real quality system and a real CEO behind them is what they need, not excuses.
There should be a rip out procedure that reinvokes inspections when a door is removed through testing
If it's a Boeing I'm not going...
In this presentation, it is unfortunate that viewgraphs and videos are not shown to the public because they would facilitate the understanding of the various elements. I hope in future presentations this will be remedied. Also, I think the names of the names of the affected "companies" be added to the names of their personnel to establish continueous relationships.
Who at Boeing signed the air worthiness
Is there a retest of the reinstalled door. Aka pressure test
Boing uses buyer and source inspectors to bypass receiving and in process inspections through final inspection
If the inspections was done for its qualified to fly ...🤔why did this happen.
Hope no third party involved
I also believe alot of pilots needs to start doing old school.check themselves not just replying on all gadgets in a airplane and auto pilots .Manual flights , manual flight computers, manual checklists outside the airplane and inside
The pannel isnt to blamed alone other parties need to be involved and training off staff
This is more of a malpractice that is criminal. Falsification of documentation and failure to follow established policies and procedures.
I work for Boeing. If you fail 4 certification classes you get fired.
Spirit has no answers because no one obviously inspects junk
She looks like Terry Garr☺️
Young Terry
Watch the Boeing Fallout on youtube you will see why planes are falling down.
Get rid off all tge planes np more flying take a train or vehicle instead
They are making junk at spirit.
Your workers are uneducated
Probably sabotage that caused the incident.
To many possibilities to blame it on the workers 🤔
Staff back m rounds and mechanical check history on the airplane and pick up on the down falls and correct them ...rather than blaming each others and questioning all the times ..something news channels need to get grips with.🫡
Admit faults ..fix them straight away... make sure dont happen again ...and move forward...this int no comedy show its serious business that needs to be addressed and fixed done problems solved!🫡