The Big Bang is *RUBBISH* and *NONSENSE* for many reasons: BIG BANG Gravity Problem: 1. Big Bang assumes energy and matter from nothing in a quantum singularity or fluctuation 2. The density is quoted variously as extreme to infinite 3. The total mass of the universe curves space and shapes the universes destiny 4. Black Holes have an escape velocity at their event horizon equal to the speed of light 5. The size of a Black Hole is measured by its mass which gives the diameter of the event horizon 6. The mass of the universe is ~1e80 protons = 6.7e53 Kg 7. The formula for escape velocity = (2GM/r)^0.5 Therefore r = 2GM/v^2 8. Given M = 6.7e53 Kg and v = 3e8 m/sec therefore Dia = 2.r = 52.5 billion light yrs 9. The universe cannot at any time have been smaller than 52.5 billion light yrs in diameter 10. This is called the Schwarzschild's Radius of any mass and is well known 11. Hence the matter in the universe can only have been created *after the expansion of space..* *The Big Bang is falsified as a violation of the law of gravity! Q.E.D.* Consistent with the bible creation of stars on day 4 after the expansion of space. Also _"Let there be light."_ on day 1 explains the uniformity of the CMBR being a burst of photon energy with no mass (deSitter solution of Einstein's wave equation).
The big bang theory doesn't claim that matter or energy came from nothing. Energy can neither be created nor destroyed. It simply states that everything was once condensed into a singularity which rapidly expanded into the universe we know today. Likely no energy was created nor destroyed as a result of the big bang. It is also impossible for infinite mass to have existed in the singularity, as that would imply infinitely high values in the universe today. Remember, energy can never be created nor destroyed, so this infinite mass would still exist today in another form if it existed in the past. I highly doubt any actual scientist would seriously say this. How does the curvature of spacetime indicate that the big bang never happened? No matter how long I try, I just can't understand what you meant by this. According to the big bang theory, the universe was once a singularity, which is the only physical part of a black hole. I believe you're implying that since even light can't escape a black hole, the big bang would therefore be impossible, as the explosion itself would need to exceed the speed of light. But it has been discovered that black holes can explode despite this constraint, thus the universe could do the same. You talk about the Schwartzchild radius like it is a physical thing. It is simply the area of a black hole at which nothing can escape its gravitational pull. But a black hole is, in reality, ONLY composed of its singularity, which is infinitely small. The singularity then exerts its high mass on the surroundings to create extreme gravity, which is what causes what we call a black hole to form. You clearly have little understanding of singularities or black holes if you are saying such blatantly incorrect things. If the space, matter and energy of the universe were all compressed into an infinitely small space, where would be the room for an event horizon to even form? The answer is that it would only be as infinitely small as the surrounding universe is. Yes, obviously the matter of the universe only formed after the big bang. It was CONVERTED from the energy of the singularity, not CREATED from nothing. Unlike most who are anti-big bang, you seem to believe in the expansion of the universe. But why do you not believe in the inciting cause of this expansion? Do you think the universe just spontaneously came into existence at a set size, started growing and then somehow gained energy and mass along the way? The big bang theory is the most plausible and accepted theory for the birth of our modern-day universe, with most evidence pointing towards it being true. Is it really a giant coincidence that the majority of scientists believe it to be true, or are they just stupid?
![PURPEECH - นี่ฉันเองคนที่... (It's me) [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/NuhHd0hOOg8/mqdefault.jpg)
who else from tla watching this for unit 1
sorry i fell asleep what was this about?
you need: brain.
Do you have a timeframe to support student learning in relation to the events descibed in this video
Great videos. Thanks!
very useful
I fucking love science.
he talks so fast
Glory be to Allah who said 1400 years ago "The heavens, We have built them with power. And verily, We are expanding it" (51:47).
huh
👍
not be bad with him
The Big Bang is *RUBBISH* and *NONSENSE* for many reasons:
BIG BANG Gravity Problem:
1. Big Bang assumes energy and matter from nothing in a quantum singularity or fluctuation
2. The density is quoted variously as extreme to infinite
3. The total mass of the universe curves space and shapes the universes destiny
4. Black Holes have an escape velocity at their event horizon equal to the speed of light
5. The size of a Black Hole is measured by its mass which gives the diameter of the event horizon
6. The mass of the universe is ~1e80 protons = 6.7e53 Kg
7. The formula for escape velocity = (2GM/r)^0.5 Therefore r = 2GM/v^2
8. Given M = 6.7e53 Kg and v = 3e8 m/sec therefore Dia = 2.r = 52.5 billion light yrs
9. The universe cannot at any time have been smaller than 52.5 billion light yrs in diameter
10. This is called the Schwarzschild's Radius of any mass and is well known
11. Hence the matter in the universe can only have been created *after the expansion of space..*
*The Big Bang is falsified as a violation of the law of gravity! Q.E.D.*
Consistent with the bible creation of stars on day 4 after the expansion of space. Also _"Let there be light."_ on day 1 explains the uniformity of the CMBR being a burst of photon energy with no mass (deSitter solution of Einstein's wave equation).
The big bang theory doesn't claim that matter or energy came from nothing. Energy can neither be created nor destroyed. It simply states that everything was once condensed into a singularity which rapidly expanded into the universe we know today. Likely no energy was created nor destroyed as a result of the big bang.
It is also impossible for infinite mass to have existed in the singularity, as that would imply infinitely high values in the universe today. Remember, energy can never be created nor destroyed, so this infinite mass would still exist today in another form if it existed in the past. I highly doubt any actual scientist would seriously say this.
How does the curvature of spacetime indicate that the big bang never happened? No matter how long I try, I just can't understand what you meant by this.
According to the big bang theory, the universe was once a singularity, which is the only physical part of a black hole. I believe you're implying that since even light can't escape a black hole, the big bang would therefore be impossible, as the explosion itself would need to exceed the speed of light. But it has been discovered that black holes can explode despite this constraint, thus the universe could do the same.
You talk about the Schwartzchild radius like it is a physical thing. It is simply the area of a black hole at which nothing can escape its gravitational pull. But a black hole is, in reality, ONLY composed of its singularity, which is infinitely small. The singularity then exerts its high mass on the surroundings to create extreme gravity, which is what causes what we call a black hole to form. You clearly have little understanding of singularities or black holes if you are saying such blatantly incorrect things.
If the space, matter and energy of the universe were all compressed into an infinitely small space, where would be the room for an event horizon to even form? The answer is that it would only be as infinitely small as the surrounding universe is.
Yes, obviously the matter of the universe only formed after the big bang. It was CONVERTED from the energy of the singularity, not CREATED from nothing.
Unlike most who are anti-big bang, you seem to believe in the expansion of the universe. But why do you not believe in the inciting cause of this expansion? Do you think the universe just spontaneously came into existence at a set size, started growing and then somehow gained energy and mass along the way?
The big bang theory is the most plausible and accepted theory for the birth of our modern-day universe, with most evidence pointing towards it being true. Is it really a giant coincidence that the majority of scientists believe it to be true, or are they just stupid?