Agreed, watching a review for the previous day's game seems like you already know what's going to happen. For me personally there's not as much interest if the review isn't done directly after the game.
At 4:35 you said that you feel most people would have recaptured with the queen. That would be a full on blunder though as your bishop was protecting that square. Taking back with the pawn was the only move.
Wow, you could have saved the entire problem by moving your dark squared bishop to f4. Saving your queen and connecting your rooks, thus preventing the back rank. Back rank mates are fairly common blunders, but the look on your face makes me forgive the exaggeration in the title.
Certainly it would be a much better move, but white still loses a piece after Nh5, and that is why Qg3 was a mistake. In general, you don't want to place your queen on the square where it can be easily attacked by minor pieces, but if you do, you have to calculate all tactics very careful. So instead of Qg3, white should have played Qf3.
Don't mind me saying but... You see one good move, become very excited and transfixed on it, and fail to notice any alternative moves, or your opponent's likely response. Saying that... I really enjoy your content... You have so much energy!!
Ha, I thought the mate in one would be you getting your queen onto a white diagonal and getting to A8, to punish the random pawn push. But no. It is a fairly common blunder at this level, people failing to realise their rooks aren't protecting each other....
I will try not to hate, but your analysis is so anoying, a lot of the lines stockfish shows are ridicilous and will never happen at the 1200-level. It is only really a blunder at your level if there is a really easy tactic like a fork, a mate or a hanging piece.
The calculation here was so bad 13:26, taking the pawn with the pawn blunders a queen, and after Bd7 and they take with the knight, you can't take because the bishop was already traded, but I think what he meant was if we checked them they can't block with the knight
You're right that he didn't calculate well enough, but it seems you haven't calculated deep enough. As far as I can tell, taking on c6 doesn't blunder a queen since after 1...Qxd4 there is 2. cxb7+, and white's queen will be reborn.
I feel like I speak for everyone when I say, doing the review in a separate video, doesn't work.
This was a great video but i would of liked if you did the review in the same video.
Agreed, watching a review for the previous day's game seems like you already know what's going to happen. For me personally there's not as much interest if the review isn't done directly after the game.
I'm not sure why you played b3.
you are very interesting, i love your videos.
17:46 famous last words meme
At 4:35 you said that you feel most people would have recaptured with the queen. That would be a full on blunder though as your bishop was protecting that square. Taking back with the pawn was the only move.
He was joking.
Always get the rooks connected on the back rank in the future! Solves a lot of issues down there haha
Wow, you could have saved the entire problem by moving your dark squared bishop to f4. Saving your queen and connecting your rooks, thus preventing the back rank. Back rank mates are fairly common blunders, but the look on your face makes me forgive the exaggeration in the title.
Certainly it would be a much better move, but white still loses a piece after Nh5, and that is why Qg3 was a mistake. In general, you don't want to place your queen on the square where it can be easily attacked by minor pieces, but if you do, you have to calculate all tactics very careful. So instead of Qg3, white should have played Qf3.
I believe after all exchanges you'd be able to keep the d5 pawn only if you push f4 pawn
How come you're doing part 1: Game review, Part 2: Live game?
Skipped the first half just to watch the game
Best Chess Videos.
Don't mind me saying but... You see one good move, become very excited and transfixed on it, and fail to notice any alternative moves, or your opponent's likely response.
Saying that... I really enjoy your content... You have so much energy!!
Ha, I thought the mate in one would be you getting your queen onto a white diagonal and getting to A8, to punish the random pawn push. But no. It is a fairly common blunder at this level, people failing to realise their rooks aren't protecting each other....
I will try not to hate, but your analysis is so anoying, a lot of the lines stockfish shows are ridicilous and will never happen at the 1200-level. It is only really a blunder at your level if there is a really easy tactic like a fork, a mate or a hanging piece.
Great ending! Your video skills are coming along with your chess.
How I hate when that happens 😮
Literally one of the most common mates in low elo chess
mate was hung and you didn't see it
The calculation here was so bad 13:26, taking the pawn with the pawn blunders a queen, and after Bd7 and they take with the knight, you can't take because the bishop was already traded, but I think what he meant was if we checked them they can't block with the knight
You're right that he didn't calculate well enough, but it seems you haven't calculated deep enough. As far as I can tell, taking on c6 doesn't blunder a queen since after 1...Qxd4 there is 2. cxb7+, and white's queen will be reborn.
@@bendacosta3696 Yeah, I missed that, but my point is that he miscalculated and could've lost his queen if it wasn't for that
u took it well