“I’ll give you this gold bar.” “Up front?” “No when it’s done.” “That won’t work. I need money this week. You’ll have to pay me each day.” “That’s fine, just don’t spend any of it or I can’t pay you each day.” “What?” “I’ll pay you each day, but you’ll have to hold onto it and give it back to me the next day as change for the portion I give you on that day.” “But the entire reason you’re giving me the money now and not at the end is because I need to spend it.” “Look my saw only makes two cuts.”
The riddles were poorly explained. 1- no information about how many times you can weight the coins 2- no information on how much time the steak need to cook 3- no information regarding the quantity of gold the dude need for the payment (but this one was actually good) 4- you say the ridle one way the first time and in another way the second time (essentially, you didn't specified if 3 chicken lay 3 eggs each or together until later) I stopped watching the video after this one, because it started to become annoying
1. You just need to weigh them one time. if it's balanced, the remaining one is fake. If it's not, the lighter one is fake since he ensured that the lighter one was fake. 2. Yeah this was a flawed problem. 3. I really didn't follow this one. All I could think of was, "wait, if the worker needed to work for more days he'd still receive the same amount of gold wouldn't he? that's basically cheating!" 4. "3 eggs in 3 days". from the beginning it was established that chickens lay eggs at 1 egg per 3 days. What was not established, however, was if the chickens the lady bought had the same rate. but meh, in these kinds of questions you have to assume they're at the same rate. 5. This one is flawed as well. There are so many things the princess can tell the knights. "I'm actually a man." or "Father changed the rules.", etc. It's a question expecting to get one right answer out of many. 6. This was just to trick people who read the "lion who hasnt eaten for 50 years" riddle into picking the lion who's only not eaten for days, not years. Still, the executioner could still have killed the child even without the electric chair. Out of 6, only 1 and 4 are actually valid riddles, and 4 is more of a math problem than a riddle.
2. Mention the time it takes you need to cook a steak, ffs. Actually, if you're cooking a steak for 10 min, you're not winning any cooking competition for sure.
The steak question (#2) is a fluke because it never mentioned how much time is required to cook a steak. Some steaks can be done in 5 - 7 minutes, which would make it possible to cook 'm all in sequence. The chicken riddle (#4) is also a fluke because it never specified the laying rate of the new chickens. Also: do her current chickens lay 3 eggs per chicken in 3 days or combined? You mention this in the solution but did NOT in the actual riddle. I stopped after #5 (the princess) because that was plain out ridiculous. It was never mentioned that the horses would compete as well, but the solution suddenly brings them in as a liable candidate too? When I enjoy a riddle it's because the rules don't get changed somewhere along the lines, as is the issue with these. Dislike, sorry.
ShelLuser in the princess riddle the king ordered them to rider their horses to the lake. You assumed only the knights have to arrive. The solution to this riddle was to listen carefully. „Ride their horses [...] the one who comes in last wins.“
The princess one is historically incorrect. Obviously she would chose the one with the purple horse blanket. In medieval times, purple dye was made only from French snail mucus, and was worth 3 times its weight in gold. If he had enough money to buy all that purple dye, he was actually royal ( in most kingdoms, only the royal family was aloud to wear purple.) If her father arranged her wedding, he would obviously want a rich and royal young man. ( just imagine ‘The More You Know’ playing behind you 💫)
Its not like she gets the choice anyway. Maybe the king wanted a strong husband over a rich one. Maybe the king already had familial ties with the purple family. Youre making assumptions
1) Easy 2) You didn't state how long it takes to cook a steak 3) A thing that is given, can't be taken back? Surely not if it's salary 4) Nice one 5) Lame 6) Hah
This video is badly done. Riddles are all about the wording. No one stipulated how long the steaks take to cook. And it wasn't outlined that it was the horse that had to reach the lake last. This is dumb and annoying.
also he even says "the knights jumped on THEIR horses" implying ownership. he didn't say they jumped on THE horses. I agree this channel relies on bad wording and lame stuff like that to call it a riddle when they aren't really riddles.
I agree and even the worker's one is badly stated, which is a pity because the riddle was a very good one. In practical terms, being paid one piece a day is very different than receiving a chunk worht four pieces, even if over the week is the same amount
For the princess one, she should marry the guy with the white horse with purple cloth. In medieval times purple was an extremely rare dye and only the rich could afford very little of it. This is also the reason why there is *no* purple on any flags
itsZinZin W The answer to that is quite simple. The flag of Dominica was created in 1996. 40 years after the first common purple dye was created. (Fun Fact: The dye was created accidentally by a scientist trying to create a cure for malaria)
The farmer couldve just said "my saws not working with me today, so im giving u the gold when u finish da well." ISNT THAT LOGICAL FOR PPL WHO DONT LIKE MATH?
'Yeah, you know that lump of gold i paid you with yesterday? I'm gonna need it back as change for today's salary. What do you mean you sold it to the bank?' This is just one of the flaws i found in how these "riddles" were presented.
The riddle didn't specify it had to be well done, just cooked. Any good chef defaults to med rare, which depending on the size of steak takes ~5 -10 minutes in a pan.
If the farmer has enough money to get himself a bar of gold, that to, to give it to someone else, why cant he buy himself a new saw? If not, why promise him a daily salary?
You never said that a steak takes 10 minutes to cook. You want people just to assume that? In real life, they wouldn't take so long. In real life, you wouldn't want to cook those little steaks for more than 7 minutes. How long do you think it takes to cook a one inch thick steak starting off at room temperature in a pan on high to medium rare? Not 10 minutes, that's for sure.
Some of your riddles are wrong. 2 required that we know the time it takes to cook the steak. Without that information it is not solvable. 5. The riddle requires that you specify that the owner of the horse that gets to the pond last marries the princess. Since that was not specified it doesn't work. 6. You can't just fuse two versions of the same riddle together like this. There are two potentially correct answers the electric chair and the lion.
the 4 th is also wrong. he tries to abuse syntax, however if his sentence should be taken literally, the answer is indeed 15. I've explained above but basically he'd have had to have said that they each lay 3 in three days otherwise you just can't know that he means all three so you are forced by rule to assume that it is the total of the subject, the three chickens, which lay three eggs in three days. Oh wait, there it all is anyway
6:02 the one who gets there last will get the princess. Jesus Christ you didn't even specify the owner of the horse who gets there last will get the princess. That is a crucial piece of information.
No. The king's deal was who get's there last, gets the princess. How can the king tell the differences between the two knights? I don't know about you but I can't tell which knight is which unless I look at their horses. To the king, those horses are the way he identifies the knights and the horses are now the main competitors. Now, the princess told them to switch horses, the knights' horse is now in the other person's hand, they will now have to race on the enemy's horse to win and make their own horse gets there last to win the princess. I can't believe some of these comments can't comprehend that.
Oi m8 how do you tell apart the horses? You are making an assumption that there are identifying markers on the horses (which is perfectly reasonable) but also there are NO identifying markers on the knights (not so reasonable).
Tofu Kingpin He based that on the picture of the video. If you base yourself on that, the whole thing make sense, but if you only base yourself on what he says, then thw whole thing gets weird, cause the king indeed didn't say anything about the ''owner'' or something
The King ordered the Knights to "ride their horses to the lake; the one who got their last would get the princess". Yes the sentence is ambiguous, BUT, it can only be ambiguous in one of two ways: 1. The Knight who gets to the lake last gets to keep the princess 2. The horse who gets to the lake last gets to keep the princess So either the rules haven't changed and the Knight that crossed got to the lake first is gonna be pretty mad OR the king just sentenced his daughter to a lifetime of getting railed by a horse.
#3 was pointlessly overcomplicated. If the builder didn’t need to be paid daily (obviously he didn’t because everyday he still had the gold from the previous day) then the farmer could have set up a weekly payment and just gave him the whole bar after the entire well was done. #4 doesn’t give you enough information to make an appropriate conclusion. 15 eggs could be correct if only one chicken out of the bunch was producing one egg a day. Or maybe there are several in the new batch who can produce an egg a day instead of in 3 Days. #5 could have had different answers. 1st the king never said if the knight or horse got there last. Second the princess could have whispered change in plans, whoever gets there first wins. Thus, not having to switch their horse.
#3 i think that you are not getting the point. The farmer tricked him by splitting 1 gold bar into 7 pieces. If he would have paid him in the end the builder would have asked for 7 different gold bars since he promised 1 bar for each day. But I do agree with #5 point. She might have said that their is treasure near the lake. The treasure is worth more than my whole kingdom or something like that No offence just cleared your doubt
Glamour.Beast #3 You are losing thepoint here .You cant think of every puzzle like why would he do that...example in the last one you can say that why would the king give such a task...and similar question can be asked in every other puzzle, u just need to come up with a solution where by making 2 cuts farmer can pay him. #4 Now u are overcomplicating the puzzle ,the info is enough here, why would u think that only 1 chicken laid 3 eggs?that's ridiculous . #5 I agree with u here...switching horses is confusing because it would not change the situation too much .Lets suppose a knight reached the lake first after switching, now he reached first but his horse reached last and with the other knight ,he reached last but his horse was first, so who's the winner ?
Dixit Jain The problem with these puzzles is that logic isn’t applied to any of them, only convenient parts of it. The farmer didn’t need to pay him 1/7 of the gold bar a day unless the man needed to use the money before the week was up so it was entirely counterproductive to take money away every day. Chicken’s don’t produce eggs like a mathematical formula plus we have no idea of telling how many eggs the new chicken she bought could produce every day.
i personally disagree, you have to remember 1 thing, these are riddles, the settings normally don't make sense because the question isn't "how would the farmer make a sound financial plan?" the point of the question is to use the given settings to figure out an answer, not to find how it's background logic doesn't hold up. sorry if this ends up sounding mean, that is the complete antithesis of what it's meant to be
#3 ...so the worker who is desperate for daily salary must not spend even a penny untill the 7th day ??? Wow If you say this is a possible answer then how abt this .. The worker is paid the full amount the first day itself and with a good will he works rest of the days too without cheating.. Riddles must be logical..
Yeah, there isn't really a good answer for that one. It was an interesting solution, but in essence it's the same as paying the worker the whole gold bare at the end of the week. If any gold is spent during the week, the system is ruined.
Yeah, this was why I couldn't figure out 3, because I was under the impression the daily salary wouldn't be returned. Or else... you know... its just a weekly salary.
Cut it vertically and horizontally, so four pieces. 2/8 for day one and two. Another for three and four. Yet another or five and six, and the seventh can be paid next morning.
F1ood Yes. The original riddle is one where two farmers wager who's horse is slower and neither horse moves in a race with the farmers sitting on their own horse. They realize the solution is to switch horses. This video was poorly done in a number of ways.
The King ordered the Knights to "ride their horses to the lake; the one who got their last would get the princess". Yes the sentence is ambiguous, BUT, it can only be ambiguous in one of two ways: 1. The Knight who gets to the lake last gets to keep the princess 2. The horse who gets to the lake last gets to keep the princess So either the rules haven't changed and the Knight that got to the lake first is gonna be pretty mad OR the king just sentenced his daughter to a lifetime of getting railed by a horse.
The King ordered the Knights to "ride their horses to the lake; the one who got their last would get the princess". Yes the sentence is ambiguous, BUT, it can only be ambiguous in one of two ways: 1. The Knight who gets to the lake last gets to keep the princess 2. The horse who gets to the lake last gets to keep the princess So either the rules haven't changed and the Knight that crossed got to the lake first is gonna be pretty mad OR the king just sentenced his daughter to a lifetime of getting railed by a horse.
In question 5 you specifically said,”they jumped back on THEIR horses ( meaning their horses they started with ) , which totally makes your ending answer to be impossible to get right if you follow the rules right.
I mean the first one and the last one were really the only ones that had sufficient evidence to provide the right answer, All of the other ones had multiple answers
The answer for the last one is to just wake up, he was just dreaming. Come on, he entered a room and the 3 doors behind him shut, it was pitch black. How come he knew all those deadly things behind the door? How did he entered that cabin without encountering those deadly stuff? Solution was: Wake up because he was just in a deep R.E.M. mode in his sleep.
@Syed Arham Ali That's wrong. At 6:21 it says she whispered in their ear, and then at 6:27 it says they jumped on *their* horses. At 6:51 it merely asks what she said to them.
Smiley Heart Exactly what I thought as well. If the builder must keep the gold in the portions he received them, it would be the same as giving the whole bar at the end of the week. Or for that matter, giving him the whole bar at any point in the week, depending on where you want to put the trust.
agreed. I think once you pay someone, you can't govern what they'll do with it. I said change the payment plan. Cut 1/7, 3/7/ and 3/7/ Give the 1st day, then agree with the dude to get paid again on the 4th day, then get paid again on the 7th day when the job is completed. Works every time and the 1/7 for the first day gains the trust.
#6 I know everyones arguing about the lion being dead or not. But the executioner I am sure is a grown man or woman who could easily take the boy. So really, I'd grab my pickaxe and starting chopping down the walls like in Fortnite..
6:57 Actually the princess would choose the knight on the right because he is wearing purple, and purple stands for royalty and wealth. So she would just want to marry the richer man, even though in modern times that would be frowned upon.
The last one doesn't make sense 1) the lions would be dead if they hadn't eaten for days 2)the executioner could simply grab the boy and choke him because the executioner would be an adult and the one dying is a boy.
For the chef one, you can't just half-cook meat and switch it out, that's not healthy (or he could just cut the steaks and make them smaller, then 6 would fit on the pan)
You confusing this with the one where the lion hasn't eaten in months or years. A lion won't die after just a couple of days. That's part of the trick of this riddle, since most people would have heard the other, and immediately think of the lion.
I'm sure the executioner can strangle the little boy to death. Or he could've brought an electric generator so it's not "obvious" that there's no electricity out there.
+BlueFluffy - It's what we call a lateral thinking riddles. The person giving the riddle has to explain it properly so that different answers don't pop up. They could've replaced the executioner with a possessed chair that tries to latch onto the boy.
The princess riddle is probably the dumbest riddle I've ever seen. If she did say they switched horses, we wouldn't know that because all you said was they got on THEIR horses and quickly rode to the lake. It would've been more logical if she had said "whoever gets to the lake first wins" cause why else would they have rode so fast..
If the horses have more importance than the princes, then the last horse should marry the princess. Understand the logic. It is a competition between people but not animals.
I thought the answer would've been that the princess told them her sister is more beautiful than she, and that the knight who got to the lake first would get to marry the sister. But of course, no sister in her right mind would say anything like that!
WisdomTheGeek exactly, like some have two answers and some have no appropriate ones. Like the three doors one, he could’ve went in the lions one because it should’ve starved to death, and the princess one could’ve been anything lol I share the dislike
But the builder could become impatient not getting the payment he was promised for 6 whole days, or if he got paid out front, he could run away with the full payment after only one day and not finish the well.
#3 - An Insight - Instead of 7 the worker could have worked for 15 days and the same method would apply. Its just that the number of days should be able to be written in binary in 1's. in case of 15 days, you would have to divide the 'gold bar' into parts of 8/15 , 4/15 , 2/15 ,& 1/15.
but....the worker will work for one week so 7 days and the gold bar is supposed to be cut into 7 pieces so 1/7th each day will cost the whole gold bar, can he not just wait until the well is built and pay the worker his full price?????
TIMESTAMPS Fake coins 0:28 A challenge for a chef 1:17 The worker's salary 2:28 Chickens and eggs 4:25 The princess and the knights 5:34 Three Doors 7:04
No.6 is the most famous and the easiest and most asked riddle and no.4 was once somewhat like a riddle asked by bright side in a post on youtube😂so congratz to me i got two riddles easily! Hehe
+Angelinaaa246 Wow we get it... Ur smart. Though I fail to believe anyone got the steak question right when the narrator didn't even state the amount of time it took to cook one side of the steak, so it's impossible
I think it wasn't clear enough that each chicken produces 1 egg per three days. You just said, the lady got three chicken who produce three eggs in three days. One could also understand that each chicken produces three eggs in three days..
For the riddle number 3 . Its better to pay a half bar gold on every 3.5 days and the half for completing the 7days . The daily salary is non sense if you get again this piece and piece of gold every . However the worker coudnt spend his piece of gold everyday 😂😂😂😂
I thought the Princess told them to hurry up or to giddy up so they would both get to the pond at the same time which meant both of them would lose since the Princess does not like marrying out of political reasons because it ain't true love.(We all know Princesses want love, real love)
Did you guys solve the third one? It's difficult 🙃
Nope I didn't even understand it
😂😂😂
I actually got it with my friends help!
It’s a smart approach, but this would assume the worker doesn’t spend the payment.
Nothing
On day 1 worker gets 1/7th. What if the worker use this for shopping. Your plan will fail
“I’ll give you this gold bar.”
“Up front?”
“No when it’s done.”
“That won’t work. I need money this week. You’ll have to pay me each day.”
“That’s fine, just don’t spend any of it or I can’t pay you each day.”
“What?”
“I’ll pay you each day, but you’ll have to hold onto it and give it back to me the next day as change for the portion I give you on that day.”
“But the entire reason you’re giving me the money now and not at the end is because I need to spend it.”
“Look my saw only makes two cuts.”
Tyler Smith
Exactly! Lol 😂
😂😂😂😂 I know right?
Tyler Smith 😉👍😜
😂😂😂
Tyler Smith I
The riddles were poorly explained.
1- no information about how many times you can weight the coins
2- no information on how much time the steak need to cook
3- no information regarding the quantity of gold the dude need for the payment (but this one was actually good)
4- you say the ridle one way the first time and in another way the second time (essentially, you didn't specified if 3 chicken lay 3 eggs each or together until later)
I stopped watching the video after this one, because it started to become annoying
5- You only say "whoever gets there last" and nothing about the horses
6- I'm sure the executioner can beat the boy in a fight
5- "she" said i'm a boy
Massimiliano Luisi yeah I know. It's started getting so weird after the second one
1. You just need to weigh them one time. if it's balanced, the remaining one is fake. If it's not, the lighter one is fake since he ensured that the lighter one was fake.
2. Yeah this was a flawed problem.
3. I really didn't follow this one. All I could think of was, "wait, if the worker needed to work for more days he'd still receive the same amount of gold wouldn't he? that's basically cheating!"
4. "3 eggs in 3 days". from the beginning it was established that chickens lay eggs at 1 egg per 3 days. What was not established, however, was if the chickens the lady bought had the same rate. but meh, in these kinds of questions you have to assume they're at the same rate.
5. This one is flawed as well. There are so many things the princess can tell the knights. "I'm actually a man." or "Father changed the rules.", etc. It's a question expecting to get one right answer out of many.
6. This was just to trick people who read the "lion who hasnt eaten for 50 years" riddle into picking the lion who's only not eaten for days, not years. Still, the executioner could still have killed the child even without the electric chair.
Out of 6, only 1 and 4 are actually valid riddles, and 4 is more of a math problem than a riddle.
Michael Gerald Yaptangco Number four was not established. It could have been interpreted as 3 chickens lay three each in three days easily
2. Mention the time it takes you need to cook a steak, ffs. Actually, if you're cooking a steak for 10 min, you're not winning any cooking competition for sure.
exactly. We are missing a data here. I haven't seen the solution yet, but the problem is wrong.
I cook mine on a grill.
Yea thats why my awnser was more brawd and open to interpretation because i was unaware of the cooking time
Tofu Kingpin ι
That's what I was thinking!
How am I suppose to solve the second riddle if they are not going to tell me how long does it take to fry each side of that steak?
Am I right?
The trick it to just cut them all up and pretend you meant to do that
Of course you are right, the riddle should tell you each it takes 10 minutes to cook a steak.
I spotted the same problem. My answer was ... just cook rest of 2 after the first 4..?
MY PROBLEM W THIS VIDEO OMG ITS NOT SPECIFIC ENOUGH
The steak question (#2) is a fluke because it never mentioned how much time is required to cook a steak. Some steaks can be done in 5 - 7 minutes, which would make it possible to cook 'm all in sequence. The chicken riddle (#4) is also a fluke because it never specified the laying rate of the new chickens. Also: do her current chickens lay 3 eggs per chicken in 3 days or combined? You mention this in the solution but did NOT in the actual riddle.
I stopped after #5 (the princess) because that was plain out ridiculous. It was never mentioned that the horses would compete as well, but the solution suddenly brings them in as a liable candidate too?
When I enjoy a riddle it's because the rules don't get changed somewhere along the lines, as is the issue with these. Dislike, sorry.
i totally agree
I totally agree
In the steak question it isn’t mentioned if you have more then one frying pan
ShelLuser- stop hating on them,they are human they are NOT perfect
ShelLuser in the princess riddle the king ordered them to rider their horses to the lake. You assumed only the knights have to arrive. The solution to this riddle was to listen carefully. „Ride their horses [...] the one who comes in last wins.“
The princess one is historically incorrect. Obviously she would chose the one with the purple horse blanket. In medieval times, purple dye was made only from French snail mucus, and was worth 3 times its weight in gold. If he had enough money to buy all that purple dye, he was actually royal ( in most kingdoms, only the royal family was aloud to wear purple.) If her father arranged her wedding, he would obviously want a rich and royal young man. ( just imagine ‘The More You Know’ playing behind you 💫)
TheWolf you are not wrong
I too have seen that video. from afterskool, right?
That is the exact reason I clicked on this i wanted to see if that was the answer
people other than royalty are not loud enough to wear purple
Its not like she gets the choice anyway. Maybe the king wanted a strong husband over a rich one. Maybe the king already had familial ties with the purple family. Youre making assumptions
1) Easy
2) You didn't state how long it takes to cook a steak
3) A thing that is given, can't be taken back? Surely not if it's salary
4) Nice one
5) Lame
6) Hah
I just said the other two steaks would be blue instead of med rare, lol
the 4th one's a syntactical abuse and he's wrong. meh
Rakehell007
The third one the farmer could have cut the bar by half |_______| And then by half again
| |
But by the side /_______\
/ \
Rakehell007 although he didn't mention the time required for each steak....the solution given is the quickest way of cooking all of them in any case
Rakehell007 He means change...not take back.
This video is badly done. Riddles are all about the wording. No one stipulated how long the steaks take to cook. And it wasn't outlined that it was the horse that had to reach the lake last. This is dumb and annoying.
l am 9 years old and l only got two right, the first and the last
also he even says "the knights jumped on THEIR horses" implying ownership. he didn't say they jumped on THE horses.
I agree this channel relies on bad wording and lame stuff like that to call it a riddle when they aren't really riddles.
I agree and even the worker's one is badly stated, which is a pity because the riddle was a very good one. In practical terms, being paid one piece a day is very different than receiving a chunk worht four pieces, even if over the week is the same amount
Mad bro 😏
This channel sucks balls.
Only the brightest minds are able to figure out what’s a pause button
M. A.lol I paused for the chicken
M. A. lol
Lol that's real.
M. A.
M. A. Haha
For the princess one, she should marry the guy with the white horse with purple cloth. In medieval times purple was an extremely rare dye and only the rich could afford very little of it. This is also the reason why there is *no* purple on any flags
When I get a country, the flag's going to be all purple.
VulcanSpawnWolf but what if thr princess isn't a gold digger
Look at Dominica's flag, there is purple on the bird 🇩🇲
itsZinZin W The answer to that is quite simple. The flag of Dominica was created in 1996. 40 years after the first common purple dye was created. (Fun Fact: The dye was created accidentally by a scientist trying to create a cure for malaria)
VulcanSpawnWolf so... It had purple on it is all I'm saying
The farmer couldve just said "my saws not working with me today, so im giving u the gold when u finish da well." ISNT THAT LOGICAL FOR PPL WHO DONT LIKE MATH?
If he has an entire bar of gold to pay for a well, he might have enough additional gold to buy another saw.
so why not just do the job yourself with the money
Autumn Angel that is the true answer to the riddle my friend you are right
Autumn Angel u r 100 percent right
Or, if he really wanted to pay him in 1/7ths... go ahead and make 6 cuts to get all 7ths. And give a seventh each day
'Yeah, you know that lump of gold i paid you with yesterday? I'm gonna need it back as change for today's salary. What do you mean you sold it to the bank?' This is just one of the flaws i found in how these "riddles" were presented.
Also, how exact can 1/7 of the gold bar be cut?
Karis Yuen it's easier than you think. If the gold bar is 7 cm long, you just cut 7 pieces of 1 cm.
I understand MicroSoft had a similar question in their job interviews. I didn't understand how you could expect to pay them on the second day, either.
It's a logical riddle why are you putting it into an irl situation...
And why not just give him the whole brick at the end of the seven days?
Insufficient data... In number 2 we were not told how long the steak has to fry for. If it was 2 minutes he could’ve just fried 4 and then 2.
u should know basic knowledge thats y
Unsubscribe im just not a fan of getting salmonella
The riddle didn't specify it had to be well done, just cooked. Any good chef defaults to med rare, which depending on the size of steak takes ~5 -10 minutes in a pan.
I thought it was one minute for one side of the steak, so I can cook one by one. LOL
Basement Productions I was thinking 3 and 3 since there are 6 steaks and 4 can fit in the pan
The Princess said "I'm really a dude."
XD
Or she said "My dad kills all my husbands" or "I never do what my dad says, so I'll marry the one who gets there first."
XTREME2DAG 😂
Or "the other guy is already there"
The wording of this one is ambiguous ("The ONE who gets there second wins"). It's sloppy writing, not a riddle.
If the farmer has enough money to get himself a bar of gold, that to, to give it to someone else, why cant he buy himself a new saw? If not, why promise him a daily salary?
The Klaymiator I feel you
Yeah just buy a new saw😭 or give all the gold at once at the end of the week
You never said that a steak takes 10 minutes to cook. You want people just to assume that? In real life, they wouldn't take so long. In real life, you wouldn't want to cook those little steaks for more than 7 minutes. How long do you think it takes to cook a one inch thick steak starting off at room temperature in a pan on high to medium rare? Not 10 minutes, that's for sure.
Some of your riddles are wrong.
2 required that we know the time it takes to cook the steak. Without that information it is not solvable.
5. The riddle requires that you specify that the owner of the horse that gets to the pond last marries the princess. Since that was not specified it doesn't work.
6. You can't just fuse two versions of the same riddle together like this. There are two potentially correct answers the electric chair and the lion.
Actually it didn’t specify if there were no knives so you could cut the steak and stir with an unspecified spoon.
Or you could serve the steaks raw.
Steggoraptor You get an A+
the 4 th is also wrong. he tries to abuse syntax, however if his sentence should be taken literally, the answer is indeed 15. I've explained above but basically he'd have had to have said that they each lay 3 in three days otherwise you just can't know that he means all three so you are forced by rule to assume that it is the total of the subject, the three chickens, which lay three eggs in three days. Oh wait, there it all is anyway
KristaStarburd and both lions and people will starve to death after days of not eating
Actually, the version of the riddle with the lion says that the lion hasn't eaten for weeks or months, not mere days.
6:02 the one who gets there last will get the princess.
Jesus Christ you didn't even specify the owner of the horse who gets there last will get the princess. That is a crucial piece of information.
Tofu Kingpin I didn't understand the answer for this one
Maybe it was all the princess’ trick and the rider who arrived last still married her, but at least it motivated them to get a move on.
No. The king's deal was who get's there last, gets the princess. How can the king tell the differences between the two knights? I don't know about you but I can't tell which knight is which unless I look at their horses. To the king, those horses are the way he identifies the knights and the horses are now the main competitors. Now, the princess told them to switch horses, the knights' horse is now in the other person's hand, they will now have to race on the enemy's horse to win and make their own horse gets there last to win the princess. I can't believe some of these comments can't comprehend that.
Oi m8 how do you tell apart the horses? You are making an assumption that there are identifying markers on the horses (which is perfectly reasonable) but also there are NO identifying markers on the knights (not so reasonable).
Tofu Kingpin He based that on the picture of the video. If you base yourself on that, the whole thing make sense, but if you only base yourself on what he says, then thw whole thing gets weird, cause the king indeed didn't say anything about the ''owner'' or something
For number two the chef can just cook them rare instead of well done.
He also never actually said the steaks needed to be cooked for 5 mins on each side lol
Ethan Robinson he never said how long they needed to be cooked.
Javan French that’s what I meant
Or he could've used a bigger pan XD ok I know that wouldn't work. Just a joke.
The Crazy Comet
Princess:" I'm pregnant."
Knights: *rush to lake
but why will they rush to the lake? can you explain.
Hmm Nice one
The King ordered the Knights to "ride their horses to the lake; the one who got their last would get the princess".
Yes the sentence is ambiguous, BUT, it can only be ambiguous in one of two ways:
1. The Knight who gets to the lake last gets to keep the princess
2. The horse who gets to the lake last gets to keep the princess
So either the rules haven't changed and the Knight that crossed got to the lake first is gonna be pretty mad OR the king just sentenced his daughter to a lifetime of getting railed by a horse.
Am I the only one who thinks in the second problem they forgot to tell how much time it takes to cook one steak
#3 was pointlessly overcomplicated. If the builder didn’t need to be paid daily (obviously he didn’t because everyday he still had the gold from the previous day) then the farmer could have set up a weekly payment and just gave him the whole bar after the entire well was done.
#4 doesn’t give you enough information to make an appropriate conclusion. 15 eggs could be correct if only one chicken out of the bunch was producing one egg a day. Or maybe there are several in the new batch who can produce an egg a day instead of in 3 Days.
#5 could have had different answers. 1st the king never said if the knight or horse got there last. Second the princess could have whispered change in plans, whoever gets there first wins. Thus, not having to switch their horse.
#3 i think that you are not getting the point. The farmer tricked him by splitting 1 gold bar into 7 pieces. If he would have paid him in the end the builder would have asked for 7 different gold bars since he promised 1 bar for each day.
But I do agree with #5 point. She might have said that their is treasure near the lake. The treasure is worth more than my whole kingdom or something like that
No offence just cleared your doubt
Glamour.Beast #3 You are losing thepoint here .You cant think of every puzzle like why would he do that...example in the last one you can say that why would the king give such a task...and similar question can be asked in every other puzzle, u just need to come up with a solution where by making 2 cuts farmer can pay him.
#4 Now u are overcomplicating the puzzle ,the info is enough here, why would u think that only 1 chicken laid 3 eggs?that's ridiculous .
#5 I agree with u here...switching horses is confusing because it would not change the situation too much .Lets suppose a knight reached the lake first after switching, now he reached first but his horse reached last and with the other knight ,he reached last but his horse was first, so who's the winner ?
Dixit Jain The problem with these puzzles is that logic isn’t applied to any of them, only convenient parts of it.
The farmer didn’t need to pay him 1/7 of the gold bar a day unless the man needed to use the money before the week was up so it was entirely counterproductive to take money away every day.
Chicken’s don’t produce eggs like a mathematical formula plus we have no idea of telling how many eggs the new chicken she bought could produce every day.
Wyatt Barrett the new chickens she bought were chicks 🐥 therefore they don’t lay eggs 🥚
i personally disagree, you have to remember 1 thing, these are riddles, the settings normally don't make sense because the question isn't "how would the farmer make a sound financial plan?" the point of the question is to use the given settings to figure out an answer, not to find how it's background logic doesn't hold up. sorry if this ends up sounding mean, that is the complete antithesis of what it's meant to be
#3 ...so the worker who is desperate for daily salary must not spend even a penny untill the 7th day ??? Wow
If you say this is a possible answer then how abt this ..
The worker is paid the full amount the first day itself and with a good will he works rest of the days too without cheating..
Riddles must be logical..
Yeah, there isn't really a good answer for that one. It was an interesting solution, but in essence it's the same as paying the worker the whole gold bare at the end of the week. If any gold is spent during the week, the system is ruined.
Or the farmer could have paid the worker a small part of the gold at the beginning and promise the rest afterwards
Yeah, this was why I couldn't figure out 3, because I was under the impression the daily salary wouldn't be returned. Or else... you know... its just a weekly salary.
Or, y'know. He can be paid at midnight, hence the other day, or the sort.
Cut it vertically and horizontally, so four pieces. 2/8 for day one and two. Another for three and four. Yet another or five and six, and the seventh can be paid next morning.
For the princess one, the Kind said to ride their horses to the lake, whoever got there *last* not whoever's horses got there first or last
F1ood Yes. The original riddle is one where two farmers wager who's horse is slower and neither horse moves in a race with the farmers sitting on their own horse. They realize the solution is to switch horses. This video was poorly done in a number of ways.
hi
The King ordered the Knights to "ride their horses to the lake; the one who got their last would get the princess".
Yes the sentence is ambiguous, BUT, it can only be ambiguous in one of two ways:
1. The Knight who gets to the lake last gets to keep the princess
2. The horse who gets to the lake last gets to keep the princess
So either the rules haven't changed and the Knight that got to the lake first is gonna be pretty mad OR the king just sentenced his daughter to a lifetime of getting railed by a horse.
4:03
Or at the end of the week he could give him the gold bar because he can’t spend the cut bar during the week otherwise this won’t work
my thought too... cant pay someone daily... and expect them NOT to use the money.
He is clearly doing something right, he has a gold bar.
Bet he farms money trees.
I completely agree
could you not just cut the gold lengthwise in half and then cut the side of the gold to make 8 pieces or would that count as too many cuts?
That would be 3 cuts if you do 2 very irregular cuts you can get 8 pieces tho the riddle never said it had to be straight cuts haha
I got 0 correct m proud of myself
same XD
Bottle flip lol me too!
Bottle flip,haha
#3 ...or he can just give him the whole gold bar on the 7th day...
Wifi :D but he peomise he will give him everyday
Wifi :D or he can give him real money!
Wifi :D yeah that’s what I said 😂
Wifi :D If we don't make things harder on us then we aren't humans😂😂.
What is the point of paying everyday, since the worker can't spend the money, since he'll need to give it back the next day?
“The one who got there last would get the princess”
So, the horse gets the princess???🤔😎
The King ordered the Knights to "ride their horses to the lake; the one who got their last would get the princess".
Yes the sentence is ambiguous, BUT, it can only be ambiguous in one of two ways:
1. The Knight who gets to the lake last gets to keep the princess
2. The horse who gets to the lake last gets to keep the princess
So either the rules haven't changed and the Knight that crossed got to the lake first is gonna be pretty mad OR the king just sentenced his daughter to a lifetime of getting railed by a horse.
@@siliconbased6555 how
@@omokojimmye.2857 how what
I don't understand at all the answers to this
it would have helped to know that the steaks only take 10 min to cook.
6:35 *”I’ll let you smash if you get there”*
oh
😂😂😂
That's exactly what I thought
that's what I was thinking 😂😂
I was thinking skinny dipping 😂
In question 5 you specifically said,”they jumped back on THEIR horses ( meaning their horses they started with ) , which totally makes your ending answer to be impossible to get right if you follow the rules right.
Emma Wolf hui
Which is why my answer was she told them she was really a man.
XD, funny... I just thought she said, "Change of plans, who gets their first will get me"
ShadyDawgWWCF that was my thinking also
I'm not working for someone who can't afford a saw
😂
stevenreynolds40
🤣🤣🤣.
I mean the first one and the last one were really the only ones that had sufficient evidence to provide the right answer, All of the other ones had multiple answers
The answer for the last one is to just wake up, he was just dreaming.
Come on, he entered a room and the 3 doors behind him shut, it was pitch black. How come he knew all those deadly things behind the door? How did he entered that cabin without encountering those deadly stuff? Solution was: Wake up because he was just in a deep R.E.M. mode in his sleep.
Nexus | Gaming CSGO & More and those are the only ones I answered
Nexus | Gaming CSGO & More uand the eggs one
I got 0 right. I'm proud of what I got
Cakecat 88 xD
Cakecat 88 Same.
Same me
Cakecat 88 you did bad
luqman hake
6:27 *The Knights Immediately Jumped on* **_their_** *horses*
6:51 *She simply told the knights* *_to switch horses_*
Well Played.
Syed Arham Ali I didn't get it
Maybe he said "jumped on the horses"
True
- Tıtαn Turn On Captions if you think it's not "Their" but "the"
@Syed Arham Ali That's wrong. At 6:21 it says she whispered in their ear, and then at 6:27 it says they jumped on *their* horses. At 6:51 it merely asks what she said to them.
The horses riddle is WRONG. He says that after the princess whispered they: "mounted *their* horses" (6:05).
How did they switched horses than?
For the gold one, what if the worker spends the money in those 7 days? Isn't that the point?
Smiley Heart Exactly what I thought as well. If the builder must keep the gold in the portions he received them, it would be the same as giving the whole bar at the end of the week. Or for that matter, giving him the whole bar at any point in the week, depending on where you want to put the trust.
or he could just melt down the gold......and make 7 new pieces... duh
agreed. I think once you pay someone, you can't govern what they'll do with it. I said change the payment plan. Cut 1/7, 3/7/ and 3/7/ Give the 1st day, then agree with the dude to get paid again on the 4th day, then get paid again on the 7th day when the job is completed. Works every time and the 1/7 for the first day gains the trust.
#6 I know everyones arguing about the lion being dead or not. But the executioner I am sure is a grown man or woman who could easily take the boy. So really, I'd grab my pickaxe and starting chopping down the walls like in Fortnite..
Charlie Artiga 😂
Charlie Artiga 😂😂😂
Oh boy
Charlie Artiga lions can survive for up too a week without eating.
Honestly you could go to the lions door. If it hasn’t eaten in weeks, it’s dead.
6:57 Actually the princess would choose the knight on the right because he is wearing purple, and purple stands for royalty and wealth. So she would just want to marry the richer man, even though in modern times that would be frowned upon.
YoBroFamLitGame s *left
YoBroFamLitGame s that’s actually true
And she was looking in his direction so
The last one doesn't make sense
1) the lions would be dead if they hadn't eaten for days
2)the executioner could simply grab the boy and choke him because the executioner would be an adult and the one dying is a boy.
#5 answer is .. princess said she has AIDS so the Knights wanted to make sure they loose the challenge and rushed on their horses
forest wow you beat me to it, lol
Haha
No she said: I’m actually a man... surprise bros!
ha
Derpity Derp haha
For the chef one, you can't just half-cook meat and switch it out, that's not healthy (or he could just cut the steaks and make them smaller, then 6 would fit on the pan)
Kaylee Marie that was my answer. Cut them up
That what I thought to because you can’t cook half steak in 5 minuets
that was my solution
That was my answer too
Exactly
For the chef one he could have just tossed 4 in the pan and tossed the rest right onto the stove. It’s not my kitchen
Lions can go like 2 weeks without food, is what one of the other videos with this riddle said.
Riddle 6-he can go in the room 3 because the lion had not eaten for days so the lion is maybe dead😕
pp So "maybe" a lion or 100% no electricity...
Michael Mader at least, he should be fainted
I guess it takes more than days for the lion to die
You confusing this with the one where the lion hasn't eaten in months or years. A lion won't die after just a couple of days. That's part of the trick of this riddle, since most people would have heard the other, and immediately think of the lion.
The lion should be fainted though
I'm sure the executioner can strangle the little boy to death. Or he could've brought an electric generator so it's not "obvious" that there's no electricity out there.
Tofu Kingpin Dude, seriously, it's a riddle. It's not meant to be super obvious otherwise everyone would get it. Get over it
+BlueFluffy - It's what we call a lateral thinking riddles. The person giving the riddle has to explain it properly so that different answers don't pop up. They could've replaced the executioner with a possessed chair that tries to latch onto the boy.
And how do we know the light bulb wasn't burnt out?
Yeah, that's why you take the starved lion's door. It won't eat you because it's starved to death.
Sarah Cannon Actually lions can survive like a month without food
The princess riddle is probably the dumbest riddle I've ever seen. If she did say they switched horses, we wouldn't know that because all you said was they got on THEIR horses and quickly rode to the lake. It would've been more logical if she had said "whoever gets to the lake first wins" cause why else would they have rode so fast..
So for #3, the worker can't spend any of his money till the week is over? That's hardly a real payment every day.
If the horses have more importance than the princes, then the last horse should marry the princess. Understand the logic. It is a competition between people but not animals.
Sam L yes true... The answer should have been that she whispered the one who reaches their first will marry her.
Sam L I heard this riddle somewhere, they ruined it (as most of those riddles tbh...).
In the original king said "whose *horse* finishes last" lol
I thought the answer would've been that the princess told them her sister is more beautiful than she, and that the knight who got to the lake first would get to marry the sister. But of course, no sister in her right mind would say anything like that!
Eliza H. Haha
Rituparna Desai even I thought the same
For number two the real answer is just get another pan
Same thought
Or cook them another way like grilling, but still they didn't say how long it has to cook.
Well of course we will come up with these in 15 seconds
just seeing that meter fell up makes it harder.
There’s this thing and it’s a really cool invention to get more time! It’s called a... DRUM ROLL PLEASE... a pause button. Wow! I know right magic
It’s just to make the video longer for more ads
I like solving riddles but I can’t deal with this guy’s voice. I never get past 1 min of the vids.
and the laughes
For the chef riddle he could just get a bigger pan
jaahbadzmoovi
Juliettea. ol or buy another freaking pan
cannot Pr0cess but it states that you can only use 1 pan
Huh lol
Juliettea. ol true
The third one had another answer: you cut swirly pieces that overlap and if you do it the correct way you get 7 pieces!😁
Tara Sparrow same got that to well done
She told to switch horse...for real??? Is this even a riddle ???
Flynn Rider i was just like. Ill Mary the first one who gets there.
4:22
1. Maybe b u y a n e w s a w
2. Give him the gold 1/7-4-7 for those days, and the worker will work his way up to get the WHOLE darn gold brick
For the chicken one, the picture is of a lady with baby chicks in a basket.... Baby chicks can't lay eggs for a couple months...
We all have animal pfps
Amy Kittycat ?
Me you and erza have animal profile pictures
These riddles are ridiculous and illogical. They don't have reasonable answers. Dislike Edit: what how did my dumb comment get 400 likes what
WisdomTheGeek exactly, like some have two answers and some have no appropriate ones. Like the three doors one, he could’ve went in the lions one because it should’ve starved to death, and the princess one could’ve been anything lol I share the dislike
The first one was logical
Lima Bean actually he didn't say how many days
YEAH THE FIRST ONE I GOT
Hi
Just melt the gold bar and separate it that way...
The princess said "okay new rule, whoever gets there first gets to smash"
There are a lots of sentence that the Princess would have said
You must say how long it takes for each stake in order to cook otherwise #2 makes no sense. Also #5 makes no sense either way lol.
If number two was he needs to cook every stake for at least 10 minutes i would accept the answer... But they way they put it is just random...
Vardaris नेपाली
नेपाली
k chha sirpali bro
#5 Princes said, "First one to the lake can have their way with me, before I marry the loser."
Why Didn’t The Farmer Just Give Him The Guy The Whole Piece Of Gold? he could’ve just did that then the guy wouldn’t need Everyday pay..
But the builder could become impatient not getting the payment he was promised for 6 whole days, or if he got paid out front, he could run away with the full payment after only one day and not finish the well.
Pay the worker a little piece at first, another mid way through, and the rest once he finished.
I did them all but #5.
It just felt so right that the princess would say - I'm actually a prince, yo! :)
At the first riddle I was like "well thats obvious"
I chose door #3 because I thought the lion would be dead if it hadn't eaten for days
bptml7 no it wouldn't.
They didnt say how many days
Lions are gluttons and can go for months. Good luck on that door though.
bptml7 me too because i heard that riddle before
Thanks so much, my kid will enjoy the achievement of solving these vids with ease when he will be 1-3 years old :)
Last question. He could’ve just grabbed the bulb, smashed it, got a piece, and stabbed the executioner to death
He could just Wait Till one of The things died of hunger
It's a riddle and he can only do the things that the riddler says he can do ._.
I mean, I think you could annoy someone with a piece of broken bulb, but killing him would be kind of McGuyveresque
6:35 my parents aren't home.
😂😂😂
Omg mine aren't too
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!
Zohra Anders" yeah!!!! let's go to my house let's have a dress up or a tea party"
HAHAHAHA
I think he can just cut the steak to fit it on a pan
"There was no electricity, because...obviously." XD
But somehow there was an executioner in the ABANDONED cabin...
Who tf gives pieces of gold? We aren’t in medieval times anymore lol, why didn’t he just give him money instead 😂
Cause my time machine malfunctioned.
He's clearly one of those "Money's worthless. Only gold has worth." people those "invest in gold" commercials are aimed at.
If that were to be so, could he not just get another gold cutter?
princess said..."i can do anything you want in bed"
Hloo broo
SomeRandomReviewer hloo
Good one 👌
Oooooohhhhh *SNAP*
SomeRandomReviewer
she said I am actually a man..
2:20 Uhh steak cant be cooked in 5 minutes...
it shrinks
Yeah it can! It just won't be cooked very much. It'll be very rare. Ultra-rare! :3
The steak is on the pan for a total of 5+5 minutes, and that's 10 in total.
Learn from big shaq.
the judges want to get food poisoned
SEVENTEEN Rad Ways to Stan Kim Taehyung rare steak stinks
#3 - An Insight - Instead of 7 the worker could have worked for 15 days and the same method would apply. Its just that the number of days should be able to be written in binary in 1's. in case of 15 days, you would have to divide the 'gold bar' into parts of 8/15 , 4/15 , 2/15 ,& 1/15.
Information is insufficient to really solve it
The princess said if you were last I will marry ya
But I will make your mom see your browsing history
Lol
Hahaha. That's the worst thing in the world. xD
...
Natsu Dragneel xD
H A H A FUNNY THAT'S DA WORST THING I EVER HEARD
but....the worker will work for one week so 7 days and the gold bar is supposed to be cut into 7 pieces so 1/7th each day will cost the whole gold bar, can he not just wait until the well is built and pay the worker his full price?????
Of course it's incredibly impractical. My method would be more acceptable in real life.
TIMESTAMPS
Fake coins 0:28
A challenge for a chef 1:17
The worker's salary 2:28
Chickens and eggs 4:25
The princess and the knights 5:34
Three Doors 7:04
Poorly explained riddle start 0:28
Poorly explained riddle ends 9:02
No.6 is the most famous and the easiest and most asked riddle and no.4 was once somewhat like a riddle asked by bright side in a post on youtube😂so congratz to me i got two riddles easily! Hehe
Same
Hey me too
Burhan Ajabsha i got three right
The first one seemed like the easiest
Bruh i got 3 easily
#6 He can go through the door he went through to come in
The one about the knight is impossible to solve. It said that they jumped onto THEIR horses. Referring to the horse that they owned.
Galactic Supernova Maybe the princess said that HE is a boy
32monexRB Lol.
fight to the death? loser won't finish at all
For the Last one, I thought it would be to come out of the door you came from.
By the last one he can also go trought the lion door because he didn't eat for days so the lion is dead
that's what i said, and if that was the case it would've been the same thing with the snakes.
I said snakes because if you don’t stress out or threaten the snake you won’t get bit.
Nope, wrong riddle bud. Days, not years
in riddle 5 u explained wrng , u said that they jumped on "THEIR" horses...
Also I don't understand why 2 could win. are the knights mormons and can both marry her?
can someone explain the princess one to me, I didn't get it
Couldn't the king just make the knights fight and the first one that falls to the ground (Alive) doesn't marry the princess?
The princess said *MY NAME IS JEFF*
duuuuuddddeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
For the egg one, you didn't specify if each of them gave off one egg, a chicken could have made 2 eggs while 1 made 1 egg and the other made zero.
he didnt specify anything
I have another solution for the bar of gold riddle:
just give the worker the entire bar of gold! BAM, quick maths!!!
This channels jokes never fail to be cringey.
no.2
go get a bigger pan
Narrator: Are you still here?
Me: No, I'm trying to translate this into my language. Wait for about 1790 years.
what?
Who ever gets to the lake first gets me
Dawn Henry Exactly
Still going at a snails pace
Well no one wants you you're wrong and I'm going back home
Wow wow wow that steak one is over complicated ... and if you like yours rare I'll have it done with time to spare.
I got all Wrong 😒
Angelinaaa246 congrats & I'm 22 years old. I'm weak at riddles
ANSHUL RATHORE your mind is so dark👎👎👎👎👎👇
ANSHUL RATHORE really:-(
ANSHUL RATHORE don't worry;-);-)
+Angelinaaa246
Wow we get it... Ur smart. Though I fail to believe anyone got the steak question right when the narrator didn't even state the amount of time it took to cook one side of the steak, so it's impossible
I think it wasn't clear enough that each chicken produces 1 egg per three days. You just said, the lady got three chicken who produce three eggs in three days. One could also understand that each chicken produces three eggs in three days..
Imke Constapel Exactly, I thought the same as well and my total came out to be 225 if each chicken laid three eggs after every three days.
Bahaar Husain me too
Yeah, and the old lady might have bought more chickens but it never specified whether all of them were matured enough to lay eggs.
Q5 was wrong.The answer was they exchanged their horse but the narrator told “the knights jumped on THEIR horses.”So it is wrong.
It said their, as in the knights' horses. Never said the knight's own horses.
shreel saparia its correct because he didnt say who got which horse.
For the riddle number 3 . Its better to pay a half bar gold on every 3.5 days and the half for completing the 7days . The daily salary is non sense if you get again this piece and piece of gold every . However the worker coudnt spend his piece of gold everyday 😂😂😂😂
I just assumed the Princess would tell them, they'd be the richest kings in the world.
Seven Pointed Star don't they know that already
Or be like these puppies are waiting and a change of rule is who ever gets there first
I though she. Said their was water at the lake since they need watet
I thought the Princess told them to hurry up or to giddy up so they would both get to the pond at the same time which meant both of them would lose since the Princess does not like marrying out of political reasons because it ain't true love.(We all know Princesses want love, real love)
I thought she would say my father is letting me chose, so first to get there wins
I’m telling the farmer to melt it down and pour 7 equal parts. Logic isn’t always algebra.