Actually one of the most valuable lessons. I often struggle with the mentality of being too married to my reference or not knowing how to augment for the painting so I appreciate you articulating these points.
Thanks Matt, it's really good to see how you can change "reality". As a newbie to watercolour, I tend to chase the details and try to reproduce the photo, but I'm learning to simplify. And your video has really helped with that. Thank you 🙏
Thank you for addressing this subject. I have always thought that I jumped the fence when I leave out something and move things together instead of messy bushes or such... I usually do it when elements I love are to far apart and there are unruly messy elements that I don't like.... But thinking of composition it makes so much sense....
Thank you for this amazing video, I’m planning to paint my photographs and sell them as sets photo+paint and I stumble on this :) One of my struggles was cured thanks 😊
good morning, Matt... it's great to hear this from a consecrated person... these are aspects that even cross our minds, but we are in doubt... you end up giving the definitive push
As Bob Ross used to say, "It's your painting, you can make it look like anything you want", and that's why we are painters as opposed to photographers.
Thanks Matt. With reference photos, what length lense do you recommend; I feel that some photos distort or festoon a little when they are wider angle. The human eyes is about 50mm and auto aperture where we focus. So I'm thinking maybe a 35mm in manual to get the real shadows?
Thank you, I have question please, Are you doing all this changes to the reference photo based on your artistic knowledge or art degree? how can a beginner without art degree do that ?
No art degree for me. Just practice, study and some workshops. The main ideas are to simplify the scene, determine what's most important and then keep the rule of thirds in mind when composing the scene. I hope that helps. th-cam.com/video/g0b9xmfbbik/w-d-xo.html
THANK YOU! Never in a million years, I would have used the words "exaggerate" and "simplification" in one sentence. For the longest time, I was literally chanting "less is more" the whole time while I was painting (be it at the initial sketch and between brushstrokes). Looking back, how could I expect the end results to be consistent because some of them ended up really "less" eg. I saw a forest, I sketched some trees, I painted what really looked like a deforested land LOL
@@learntopaintwatercolor Yes. Only a very good art historian would know the answer I guess... For me, it is an important and profound question. Because it seems totally obvious for watercolor pros that strongly modifying the scene is ok (I guess the real reason is for commercial purpose by getting "standard" beauty and pleasing the majority). But as artists, we could be concerned by the underlying non verbal statement about beauty, reality, when doing this...
Wonderful!
Thank you!
Actually one of the most valuable lessons. I often struggle with the mentality of being too married to my reference or not knowing how to augment for the painting so I appreciate you articulating these points.
So true!
Thanks Matt, it's really good to see how you can change "reality". As a newbie to watercolour, I tend to chase the details and try to reproduce the photo, but I'm learning to simplify. And your video has really helped with that. Thank you 🙏
Thank you for addressing this subject.
I have always thought that I jumped the fence when I leave out something and move things together instead of messy bushes or such...
I usually do it when elements I love are to far apart and there are unruly messy elements that I don't like....
But thinking of composition it makes so much sense....
Glad you liked it, Stinna!
I wish you had some more step-by-step tutorials. I love your instruction and mindset.
Love, Love, Love this lesson! Thank you!!
So glad!
Great advices, you dispel some of my "doubts" about composition, many thanks!
Thank you for this amazing video, I’m planning to paint my photographs and sell them as sets photo+paint and I stumble on this :)
One of my struggles was cured thanks 😊
A great tutorial once again. Thanks so much Matt
i love this info- as a beginner i do have the tendency to put just about everything from the reference photo. thanks Matthew. you're a dear.
Thanks for these tips Matthew! With thousands of reference photos this is very, very helpful. 🎨✌️
Glad to hear that!
You have opened me up to a most interesting approach to painting with reference pictures. Thank you
You’re welcome!
good morning, Matt... it's great to hear this from a consecrated person... these are aspects that even cross our minds, but we are in doubt... you end up giving the definitive push
Great example, thanks for sharing this so clearly
Glad it was helpful!
Thank you, this is a great video. Very nice painting.
As Bob Ross used to say, "It's your painting, you can make it look like anything you want", and that's why we are painters as opposed to photographers.
That’s right. Good words from Bob.
Great advice...so timely.
Glad it was helpful!
Wow thank you so much. Best video on this subject as far as I’ve seen 🌺
Thank you! Glad you liked it.
Very helpful. Thank you.
Glad it was helpful!
Very helpful. Thank you!
Sir,welcome to our Bangladesh. Our river, trees,light and shadow make you crazy.
Thanks Matt. With reference photos, what length lense do you recommend; I feel that some photos distort or festoon a little when they are wider angle. The human eyes is about 50mm and auto aperture where we focus. So I'm thinking maybe a 35mm in manual to get the real shadows?
Thank you 😊
Tbh I wanna download this video it’s so inspiring what you say
So glad you liked it!
Thank you, I have question please, Are you doing all this changes to the reference photo based on your artistic knowledge or art degree? how can a beginner without art degree do that ?
No art degree for me. Just practice, study and some workshops. The main ideas are to simplify the scene, determine what's most important and then keep the rule of thirds in mind when composing the scene. I hope that helps. th-cam.com/video/g0b9xmfbbik/w-d-xo.html
thank you so much TwT you helped me a lot
Thanks a lot
THANK YOU! Never in a million years, I would have used the words "exaggerate" and "simplification" in one sentence. For the longest time, I was literally chanting "less is more" the whole time while I was painting (be it at the initial sketch and between brushstrokes). Looking back, how could I expect the end results to be consistent because some of them ended up really "less" eg. I saw a forest, I sketched some trees, I painted what really looked like a deforested land LOL
You’re welcome! Glad you liked the video.
Mathew no email no link for the avoid overworking watercolour ??
Did you follow the link and sign up? If so check your junk. It sometimes ends up there.
Did great painters (Van Gogh, Cézanne, Monet, ...) modify their scenes?
I am not sure, this is not clear to me...
Great question. I'm guess that they told a few "white lies" to make for better compositions.
@@learntopaintwatercolor Yes. Only a very good art historian would know the answer I guess...
For me, it is an important and profound question. Because it seems totally obvious for watercolor pros that strongly modifying the scene is ok (I guess the real reason is for commercial purpose by getting "standard" beauty and pleasing the majority).
But as artists, we could be concerned by the underlying non verbal statement about beauty, reality, when doing this...