Wiles had a side hussle during Covid propagandising for the Govt. So her safety during this was the University's responsibility? She was also speaking outside her discipline. There were far more qualified people, but they were at odds with the narrative the Govt was pushing. Wiles can speak as a citizen but not on behalf of the University, but now the Uni has to foot the bill for her protection because of her moonlighting and 15 mins of fame?
Remember, In nature poisonous creatures will often develop bright colours to warn others of their toxicity. Perhapes Suzie should change her hair colour.
@@MatowixDr Campbell even apologized to everyone on video for initially being in support of the vaccine. You could tell he feels disgusted in himself for believing the lies he, like most of us, were fed. He now actually follows the science, the evidence based science, rather than the propaganda-based 'science'.
I remember when she appeared on TV *against* face masks as she told the interviewer to apply correctly takes much time and training, next minute she was attesting to the exact opposite and supporting the government’s mandates for wearing them. She was not then acting as a scientist but the Labour government’s hired hand - take your questionable case to them not the university.
Cash payout should be coming from the Labour/Green parties,not Auckland University, she'd been warned by them,to cease & desist,while she worked for the uni.Ignored,that,it seems & took instructions from Adern & co,her constant employer for 6 years,+.
People who think she was a government propagandist seem to forget she was approached BY THE MEDIA for information because IT IS HER PROFESSION. she's a damn virologist, you utter, utter clowns. you all should be completely ashamed, and never show your faces in public... ever. go live in a cave somewhere.
Unless her employer (Auckland Uni) required her to front for THEM to the media, they have no obligation to supply any private security for her. I'd like an alarm and a panic button installed at my house. Should my employer pay for it ?
She chose to work with the government around covid.. how is it that the University has any responsibility to keep her protected because in working for the Government she was outside the University employment at that time ... she is just an opportunist looking to be compensated by the taxpayer because things have gone soar .... it was her decision to work with Labour and Ardern and she enjoyed the money she made and the fame she gained while she did - she needs to get on with her life and take responsibilities for her own actions which were hers alone and nothing to do with the University at the time.
A banshee, "woman of the fairy mound" or "fairy woman" is a female spirit in Irish folklore who heralds the death of a family member, usually by screaming, wailing, shrieking, or keening. Fits nicely.
@@stevehughes1510 depends on the quality of information she was giving. if she had been speaking truth then she would have been brave, rather than foolish
@@kungfutzu3779 Her mistake and foolishness comes from her ignoring the advice of those at the UNI as Barry Scott points out, she put herself in a compromising position as a result.
No, we do NOT owe Ms Wiles much, if anything. She enlisted on one side of the argument, and would have been paid to do so, I imagine. Barring actual assaults in places where U of A might have had a physical duty of care, she was simply someone speaking in sanctimonious terms advocating things/actions that I found offensive. Not being someone seeking money from a government agency, I am not intending to sue anyone. Ms Wiles - go away.
most people wouild love to have a platform to give their opinions, we don't need to thank her for her privilege. next i'll have to thank all the voters who voted the opposite of me
The underlying problem with Siouxsie Wiles presenting herself as a pandemic response and vaccine expert is that she is neither of these! Not. An. Expert. Now from what I can see of her *actual* research she is smart...but (channelling 'Zero Dark 30': a lot of us are smart...but she just parroted the govt's massaging and that made many of us (particularly those that examined the ongoing overseas research that was pointing to a changing of all these things) really frustrated. I do not support the personal attacks and threats that were directed at her - but I *do* support the criticisms and also the exposure of hypocrisy re 'paddle-gate'. It does seem to me that she is melding these things together. Re the actual court case, it seems to me that she clearly stepped outside her area of expertise for which she was employed by the university. Now while I think people should be allowed (or even encouraged to some extent) to do this - *but* this should be clearly stated (wearing a white lab coat while presenting views outside your expertise is deceptive for instance) and I do not see how the university should be held responsible for any alleged safety concerns.
Wiles went way beyond her expertise, I don't support the abuse she received, but I don't think she can blame it on the university. Had she stuck to her area and left the social commentary behind, I think she would have been much better received.
What "abuse"? Being called out as a hypocrite? Being argued that she acted like she knew more than anybody else, including global experts? Once you choose to put yourself in public life, grow a pair or thicker skin. Pussies....
At a time when the uni is making staff and lecturers redundant, she wants to take more money from the budget. As if people needed more evidence than her bright pink hair, of a complete narcissist. She took the money, doesn’t want the consequences.
Her name is spelled not as in her persona would have you believe. If you can't identify to the public with authenticity in your name, don't expect us to take you seriously. Especially with woke pink hair.
She was happy to lap up all that attention by licking the boot, now the boot is on the other foot, she wants the uni to protect her from the consequences of her actions.
It reminds me of the time I was contacted by ACC because one of my employees was bitten by a mosquito at work. I was told I was not doing enough to ensure their safety. I had to ring them back because I could not believe it wasn't a prank call.
pest control on the premises would be the business owner's responsibility but i don't see how the employee's special security needs for their own extracurricular acivities were any business of the university's
She was chasing fame. She loved being in the spotlight…. The university isn’t responsible for her safety, in fact they probably have a case to fire her for being off her duties….
Listened to jabcinder twice for 5 painful minutes, 3 minutes to bloomfeild, and all of 30 seconds to that pink horror. Then had all 3 grifters switched off permanently. Missed nothing!
Surely a smart person like her would have worked out all the details surrounding and providing information on behalf of the gvt.....btw the msm were the only journalists interviewing her ? Imo her first port of call should be the Labour gvt JA, and Covid and co.
She was all good when the spot light r was on her but now. Oh now her feelings are hurt because the cafe didn't have sugar donuts. Only honey organic donuts. And only 20.
Am a bit tired of her. It has now well been shown a lot of what she said was not correct! Nobody should ever been threatened , but the person on trial should be the one making the threats. Not the workplace
Somebody trying to save themselves from Nuremberg trails and distance themselves from govt and blaming uni?? 'I had nothing to do with govt, clot shots....bla bla'. This is a DISTRACTION.!
I actually haven't heard any direct threats quoted. Just implied suggestions she would get her comeuppance. But hey, that's called Karma. And no-one needs to "attack" her for that to work, the universe has ways of paying us for our sins.
Dr wiles had a history of self-aggrandizing long before COVID, pretending to be an expert in all sorts of fields of science in which she has no training. During COVID she chose to pretend to know about virology, epidemiology and public health to get attention for herself. If she doesn't like some of the attention she got, perhaps she will stick to her own field of expertise in future. We can only hope so anyway.
Michael Baker reminds me of a deranged Marxist prof I used to have at uni who forced our tutorial class to watch a gay porn movie to teach us about ‘diversity’.
Her duplicity is appalling and the case against the university questionable. At the very least, as a scientist Wiles must have been aware that the government message did not have scientific consensus and yet she had no qualms in being a party to the “one source of truth” nonsense or demonising those who had valid objections as her heightened profile came with benefits. She could take all the bouquets but squealed at the merest brickbat and is now after further benefits for portraying herself as a victim.
@@chrismckellar9350you’re quite right and I didn’t get up and pretend I did. Wiles on the other hand inferred expertise in immunology when her field of expertise is microbiology specifically mycology. She was the nothing more than the government’s hired hand - their mascot, like the McDonald’s hamburglar.
@@sue.F - So if she was the govt hired hand or paid by the University of Auckland what is your issue with here. She was doing a public services in informing the public about he SAR-cov-2 virus like any other heath professional.
@@chrismckellar9350 she was hired by the U of A but not in the capacity of covid spokesperson for the government, this was a role quite outside the university, not in her job description at all. She may not have received direct financial remuneration from the government but she gained significant advantage by being part of the left elite - looked very good in her CV as “science educator”. That she conveniently forgot the role of a scientist is to be open to scrutiny and debate is her failing not the university.
Yes, the word "cabal" is quite appropriate here. She was criticised, and most of it was appropriate, although the extreme stuff (threats) were totally unnecessary. If her political actions were outside of her university work, then I can't see how the employer should have any obligations.
She was an interesting crisis actor that's for sure lol. Whose ever idea it was with the hair needs a pay rise. Caught your eye, forever stuck. How are people still getting fooled in this day in age is beyond me haha. This is all a comedy show. Even this. It's all bs. They are all playing a role. The world is a stage. Just think how your job works and then think of that large scale. Countries are not countries. They are companies and we are their product. Corporations own countries and PMs and presidents are just the CEO of that company (country). When a cop gives you a fine for not wearing your safety belt it's because you are putting their product (you) at risk of injury or death. We are the cogs in the machine. The hamster in the wheel. Like what good is this? It's all just theatre. Chad rant over. Just my opinion and thoughts.
Mmm. No sympathy for this so called expert. Never did I hear her advise unfit fat people to eat healthy and active. Mind you she would have to tell herself that as well.
She wallowed in the publicity with s hameless pleasure. She repeated t like a parrot the safety bs..... she deserves to be safe but nothing more .if she ditched the pink hair and got a mullet she could try out for the silver ferns😂
Here's the thing: Wiles didn't just give the public information, she gave advice, based in part on information ("facts"), but also based on subjective assessment of those "facts". This advice likely also includes her own personal biases and the government agenda which she was encouraged to support (by the government). If the government really did "recruit" her to push their agenda, then they should be responsible for protecting her from the consequences. Suppose that I worked on a building site and the secret service recruited me to infiltrate a terror ring that was operating on that site. Who should protect me? The building site company or the secret service? Clearly the latter, I would think! If however, Wiles gave all the covid advice purely as part of her job at the University, without significant government influence, then Wiles has a case IF she kept strictly to the facts (or kept sufficiently close to the facts). But she didn't! She gave advice that seemed to be based on a worst case scenario for covid. This advice put many people at a disadvantage, but it probably suited Wiles to work at home, on full pay, during lockdowns! It may have also fed her own sense of self-importance, being suddenly so relevant and widely quoted in the press. This is what I mean by personal bias. It might be argued that Wiles was using the University as a vehicle to promote herself and push subjective opinions that suited her personally. If this is true, then I suggest that the University owes Wiles nothing but a termination of employment letter! The case should examine whether Wiles kept sufficiently close to the facts when giving advice about the pandemic and whether or not it was justifiable for her to base that advice on the worst case scenario. If she was really acting as a puppet for the government, then they should be held responsible, not the University of Auckland.
You got it right .. funny alright. i'm not even an expert Lol. what a joke in 2023 . how ,intellectual we are supposed to be ,and the media are feeding us this crap. We are globally in the shit alright. like we are in the shit, if this is the pinnacle of the news media that we have to feast on. OMGS. Her and poor M Baker . shut me down for having a voice. Someone is in control . and I dont think its us. what a joke.
Looking at both sides of the story it is a very complex case. Was she working for the government but also within her Auckland University remit? She actually has a legit case. We should not judge her because of her weight or her hair - forget about that and be better - judge her on what she told us during the pandemic. Was it science based or paid government propaganda?? If I judge her on her science based info - she should take a 360 and tell the public it was all a bunch of Bullshit!!!!
if her position with covid and the government had nothing to do with the university and wasn't part of her employment with said university, she doesn't have a case for them to protect her in the work place, as it was her actions that put her on that position, and her sole responsibility to keep her business out of the work place, the same as if i had an argument with my wife at home , and she then came to my work place and hit me, its not my employer responsibility to protect me its my responsibility.
Why then cannot every person she affected with her paid for misinformation sue her ? If you are a attention seeking knob sometimes you get attention you do not want !
Was her employer, the university, an extension of the government itself? In which case, by implication could she have felt, that once she was in bed with the devil she couldn’t get out and risk losing her career?
I have no sympathy for this toxic woman who broke her own rules during lockdown but berated others for trying to avoid the most egregious of the rules
Wiles had a side hussle during Covid propagandising for the Govt. So her safety during this was the University's responsibility? She was also speaking outside her discipline. There were far more qualified people, but they were at odds with the narrative the Govt was pushing. Wiles can speak as a citizen but not on behalf of the University, but now the Uni has to foot the bill for her protection because of her moonlighting and 15 mins of fame?
Exactly, she is a mycologist and has no grounding in virology or immunology but this didn’t stop her inferring expertise in these fields.
Didn't she get busted being outside her bubble during level 4 ? No wonder she got ridiculed.
She gets ridiculed in Oz for different reasons. Can't believe that Hopkins prick is still on the scene.
Yep 'paddle gate'. That level of entitlement clearly got folk angry!
Don’t be silly. The rules don’t apply to politicians and their favourites‼
Remember, In nature poisonous creatures will often develop bright colours to warn others of their toxicity. Perhapes Suzie should change her hair colour.
i keep wondring why she doesn't just do that if she's afraid. nobody would recognize her
She wanted the fame, then couldn't handle it when many disagreed with her message.
This woman had no problem mandating people out of their jobs?
Exactly!!!
@@Shegotsomethintosay yup to hell with her
Would Siouxsie like to comment on all the excess deaths being experienced in all highly vaccinated countries?
According to Sean and his mate Michael Baker they don't exist 😂
She’d be more likely to join a gym and lose 50kg of blubber.
Nobody talks about that except Dr Campbell
@@MatowixDr Campbell even apologized to everyone on video for initially being in support of the vaccine. You could tell he feels disgusted in himself for believing the lies he, like most of us, were fed. He now actually follows the science, the evidence based science, rather than the propaganda-based 'science'.
I remember when she appeared on TV *against* face masks as she told the interviewer to apply correctly takes much time and training, next minute she was attesting to the exact opposite and supporting the government’s mandates for wearing them. She was not then acting as a scientist but the Labour government’s hired hand - take your questionable case to them not the university.
Absolutely right she was not working for the Auckland university when she was undertaking spokesman duties on behalf the government
Cash payout should be coming from the Labour/Green parties,not Auckland University, she'd been warned by them,to cease & desist,while she worked for the uni.Ignored,that,it seems & took instructions from Adern & co,her constant employer for 6 years,+.
you have a VERY poor memory.
$3 million convinced her....
Allocated to 4 "scientists" to prove masking and lockdowns will win the fight...
@thomasneal9291 which statement are you denying???
She was a government propagandist and now evidently she is also a troublemaker employee. She's vile.
Yep bang on and a saffa too fuk sake
Deportation required
Stat
Totally agree with you
Totally disagree with you.
People who think she was a government propagandist seem to forget she was approached BY THE MEDIA for information because IT IS HER PROFESSION. she's a damn virologist, you utter, utter clowns. you all should be completely ashamed, and never show your faces in public... ever. go live in a cave somewhere.
Wiles decided to go onto the media, she was fronting for the Labour Government. They are the ones she should take her case against.
The lawyer outlines the statue and how it works.
Ol Pinkie cryin cause she not on TV anymore spouting paranoia
No money there though, they're bankrupt, similar to what they almost achieved doing with New Zealand,with the bat crazy Greens/ TPM as side kicks.
Wiles spread misinformation to the masses, with a smile on her face.
Hiw do you know she spread misinformation to the masses?
stop projecting, ignorant liar.
If youre going to have bright pink hair and tell the nz people what to do you should have thicker skin!!!
Siouxsie Wiles should not expect a university for her outspoken covid narative. she should be in court herself being prosecuted.
no, the people being prosecuted should be those who put others most at risk through their own willful ignorance. YOU might be a great choice.
STFU & GTFO have some more booster shots Thomas. Obviously you think they work wonders @@thomasneal9291
@thomasneal9291 you don't seem to be a very bright person.
Unless her employer (Auckland Uni) required her to front for THEM to the media, they have no obligation to supply any private security for her. I'd like an alarm and a panic button installed at my house. Should my employer pay for it ?
& my employer should do the warrant of fitness on the vehicle i drive to work
She chose to work with the government around covid.. how is it that the University has any responsibility to keep her protected because in working for the Government she was outside the University employment at that time ... she is just an opportunist looking to be compensated by the taxpayer because things have gone soar .... it was her decision to work with Labour and Ardern and she enjoyed the money she made and the fame she gained while she did - she needs to get on with her life and take responsibilities for her own actions which were hers alone and nothing to do with the University at the time.
What a load of rubbish. Where you in the same room, with her and the University talking about her roles?
If there's an agreement signed with the government for her expertise on covid then it's not Auckland Uni issue..
Should have named herself Banshee after Siouxie and the Banshees...would have been more fitting.
Sooooooowie works perfectly
A banshee, "woman of the fairy mound" or "fairy woman" is a female spirit in Irish folklore who heralds the death of a family member, usually by screaming, wailing, shrieking, or keening.
Fits nicely.
She needs to take the Govt of the time to task doesn't she? Can't see the Uni being responsible in any way for her actions.
She was quietly and politely told by her employers to stop talking to the media.
But chose to ignore that professional advice.
@@barryscott6222Thanks for the info. She's a foolish person on that basis isn't she.
@@stevehughes1510 depends on the quality of information she was giving. if she had been speaking truth then she would have been brave, rather than foolish
@@kungfutzu3779 Her mistake and foolishness comes from her ignoring the advice of those at the UNI as Barry Scott points out, she put herself in a compromising position as a result.
Threatening people with violence is a crime. Trolling beached whales isn't.
Only credible threats, with evidence. Everyone seems to skip the first step. She is a liar so why believe anything she says?
Vultures look like her after they've had their heads inside a fresh carcass, except that the red on top of their heads isn't hair dye.
Siouxsie, YOU laid down with dogs and got up with fleas. How is that the responsibility of your employees? She doesn't have a peg to stand on imo...
Great saying I haven't heard that one for a while. Will bring it into my regular rotation of insults. Thanks so much
No, we do NOT owe Ms Wiles much, if anything.
She enlisted on one side of the argument, and would have been paid to do so, I imagine.
Barring actual assaults in places where U of A might have had a physical duty of care, she was simply someone speaking in sanctimonious terms advocating things/actions that I found offensive. Not being someone seeking money from a government agency, I am not intending to sue anyone.
Ms Wiles - go away.
most people wouild love to have a platform to give their opinions, we don't need to thank her for her privilege. next i'll have to thank all the voters who voted the opposite of me
The underlying problem with Siouxsie Wiles presenting herself as a pandemic response and vaccine expert is that she is neither of these! Not. An. Expert. Now from what I can see of her *actual* research she is smart...but (channelling 'Zero Dark 30': a lot of us are smart...but she just parroted the govt's massaging and that made many of us (particularly those that examined the ongoing overseas research that was pointing to a changing of all these things) really frustrated.
I do not support the personal attacks and threats that were directed at her - but I *do* support the criticisms and also the exposure of hypocrisy re 'paddle-gate'. It does seem to me that she is melding these things together.
Re the actual court case, it seems to me that she clearly stepped outside her area of expertise for which she was employed by the university. Now while I think people should be allowed (or even encouraged to some extent) to do this - *but* this should be clearly stated (wearing a white lab coat while presenting views outside your expertise is deceptive for instance) and I do not see how the university should be held responsible for any alleged safety concerns.
A quarter share in $3 million can make any asshat an "expurt"...
Exactly. She is not a virology, epidemiologist or public health expert but she chose to play all three. NZ deserved better.
And you of course an Expert yourself?
@@Pete-z6e No, but I'm not appearing on media in a white lab coat pretending I am. How is the difference hard for you to understand?
She should be locked up..
Wiles went way beyond her expertise, I don't support the abuse she received, but I don't think she can blame it on the university. Had she stuck to her area and left the social commentary behind, I think she would have been much better received.
What "abuse"?
Being called out as a hypocrite?
Being argued that she acted like she knew more than anybody else, including global experts?
Once you choose to put yourself in public life, grow a pair or thicker skin.
Pussies....
What abuse? Self reported or reported to the police?
At a time when the uni is making staff and lecturers redundant, she wants to take more money from the budget. As if people needed more evidence than her bright pink hair, of a complete narcissist.
She took the money, doesn’t want the consequences.
I think she may well have a good case against her hairdresser don't you think?
She's bald underneath
Blue n bald heads rock, and I'm a 'hairblesser' so I (((👃)))
☝️😉💙
If you appear ridiculous, you are going to be ridiculed.
bet auckland uni regrets hiring her now
Her name is spelled not as in her persona would have you believe. If you can't identify to the public with authenticity in your name, don't expect us to take you seriously. Especially with woke pink hair.
Siouxsie sioux is fearless. "Pulled to bits" is an example of her persona.
She was happy to lap up all that attention by licking the boot, now the boot is on the other foot, she wants the uni to protect her from the consequences of her actions.
Huh. She grabbed the limelight no one forced her to apear on tv. And then cry s when some people don’t like her bulls#%t
Covid Grifters getting what they deserve, best make sure those security guards are 10x boosted to protect her
or she could just get boosted herself. i hear that gives good protection
@kungfutzu3779 Michael trust the science laws thinks so 🤔
It reminds me of the time I was contacted by ACC because one of my employees was bitten by a mosquito at work. I was told I was not doing enough to ensure their safety. I had to ring them back because I could not believe it wasn't a prank call.
pest control on the premises would be the business owner's responsibility but i don't see how the employee's special security needs for their own extracurricular acivities were any business of the university's
@kungfutzu3779 only if such "pests" would be seen as dangerous, and not a fact of living in a country with mozzies.
Are native mosquitos a protected species in NZ?
Did someone look at her with the wrong pronouns?
Gold
😂😂
😂
Leave Nz pink hair like jabsinda did
Pig at the trough
🎶'Assmarelda'🐽
...by🎶Gutalax 😉👌
Deserves everything she gets.she should be in prison
I think she should also take a case against kfc as well
Classic victom mentality
"Victim" play book you mean.
She made her bed, now she must lay on it. She loved the fame and the $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$, now can't stand the heat. Tough.
Who really would believe anything she would say
What do you mean?
She got up and lied just like the other two Jabsint and Doctor whoever's should all be charged for stuffing our country up
@@chrismckellar9350 She is a moron ?
Didn’t Radio NZ present her as a virologist??
Did they? She isn't a virologist.
She is yesterday's news, a Jacinder bot, also known as the effected.
I don't quite understand what the university has.to do with anything, when she was the one who decided to engage with the media of her own volition.
She was chasing fame. She loved being in the spotlight…. The university isn’t responsible for her safety, in fact they probably have a case to fire her for being off her duties….
Listened to jabcinder twice for 5 painful minutes, 3 minutes to bloomfeild, and all of 30 seconds to that pink horror. Then had all 3 grifters switched off permanently. Missed nothing!
Gravy wiles
Surely a smart person like her would have worked out all the details surrounding and providing information on behalf of the gvt.....btw the msm were the only journalists interviewing her ? Imo her first port of call should be the Labour gvt JA, and Covid and co.
Glowing fungus is her special area
nasty carpet for sure
Sadly the "One source of Truth" has fled the stage and will never publicly back her proxy in poor Souxsie.
She was all good when the spot light r was on her but now. Oh now her feelings are hurt because the cafe didn't have sugar donuts. Only honey organic donuts. And only 20.
Loving the comments ,says it all about the ol look at me look at me tart .
Man , poor her . I was worried about losing my Job . I do feel sorry for her. You think?
Am a bit tired of her. It has now well been shown a lot of what she said was not correct! Nobody should ever been threatened , but the person on trial should be the one making the threats. Not the workplace
Somebody trying to save themselves from Nuremberg trails and distance themselves from govt and blaming uni??
'I had nothing to do with govt, clot shots....bla bla'.
This is a DISTRACTION.!
She is not even being that strategic.
She just wants more money for nothing like any other leftist.
She did push a lot of unwholesome government propaganda on the population, but threats are never okay
How do you that she push a lot of unwholesome government propaganda on the population?
All laws have threats implied.
I actually haven't heard any direct threats quoted.
Just implied suggestions she would get her comeuppance.
But hey, that's called Karma.
And no-one needs to "attack" her for that to work, the universe has ways of paying us for our sins.
“Because she was fat and had pink hair and that was all about diversity”. 😮😅😂😂😂😂
But she didn't give us all the information.
Dr wiles had a history of self-aggrandizing long before COVID, pretending to be an expert in all sorts of fields of science in which she has no training. During COVID she chose to pretend to know about virology, epidemiology and public health to get attention for herself. If she doesn't like some of the attention she got, perhaps she will stick to her own field of expertise in future. We can only hope so anyway.
It is good to see the lawyer show how the host uses words to create an angle and cut off his guest.
I suppose much could be said of the role that Rod Jackson, Michael Baker, and Paul Spoonly meted out on NZ public! !
Ma Baker!
Michael Baker reminds me of a deranged Marxist prof I used to have at uni who forced our tutorial class to watch a gay porn movie to teach us about ‘diversity’.
She must be missing the limelight 😂
celebrity scientist
I would like to question both those adjectives in this case.
Her duplicity is appalling and the case against the university questionable. At the very least, as a scientist Wiles must have been aware that the government message did not have scientific consensus and yet she had no qualms in being a party to the “one source of truth” nonsense or demonising those who had valid objections as her heightened profile came with benefits. She could take all the bouquets but squealed at the merest brickbat and is now after further benefits for portraying herself as a victim.
I guess you are an experienced microbiologist.
@@chrismckellar9350you’re quite right and I didn’t get up and pretend I did. Wiles on the other hand inferred expertise in immunology when her field of expertise is microbiology specifically mycology. She was the nothing more than the government’s hired hand - their mascot, like the McDonald’s hamburglar.
@@sue.F - So if she was the govt hired hand or paid by the University of Auckland what is your issue with here. She was doing a public services in informing the public about he SAR-cov-2 virus like any other heath professional.
@@chrismckellar9350 she was hired by the U of A but not in the capacity of covid spokesperson for the government, this was a role quite outside the university, not in her job description at all. She may not have received direct financial remuneration from the government but she gained significant advantage by being part of the left elite - looked very good in her CV as “science educator”. That she conveniently forgot the role of a scientist is to be open to scrutiny and debate is her failing not the university.
@@sue.F - How do you know what arrange she had with the University?
'What is at stake here' - an open check. Just pay her now and get her out of our sight.
Leeches do what Leeches do...
was she paid by the government to appear on camera saying all she said ?
Yes, the word "cabal" is quite appropriate here. She was criticised, and most of it was appropriate, although the extreme stuff (threats) were totally unnecessary. If her political actions were outside of her university work, then I can't see how the employer should have any obligations.
...oy vey 🥴
The Pink Whale looking for a easy pay day
Precious little sooky baby 😂
She was an interesting crisis actor that's for sure lol. Whose ever idea it was with the hair needs a pay rise. Caught your eye, forever stuck. How are people still getting fooled in this day in age is beyond me haha. This is all a comedy show. Even this. It's all bs. They are all playing a role. The world is a stage. Just think how your job works and then think of that large scale. Countries are not countries. They are companies and we are their product. Corporations own countries and PMs and presidents are just the CEO of that company (country). When a cop gives you a fine for not wearing your safety belt it's because you are putting their product (you) at risk of injury or death. We are the cogs in the machine. The hamster in the wheel. Like what good is this? It's all just theatre. Chad rant over. Just my opinion and thoughts.
I think they should have protected her more, they should have brought her a mask and a hat to disguise herself and keep safe.😀
"She was fat and had pink hair"... 😮
She worked for a political ideology.
She’s such a joke 😅😂
So,Suzy was a Labour Government muppet,friend ,or salary.?
She was just image building when acting as a side show for Jacinda. She got well enough paid. Seems to be looking for more pocketmoney.
Mmm. No sympathy for this so called expert. Never did I hear her advise unfit fat people to eat healthy and active. Mind you she would have to tell herself that as well.
Did the University ask her to make public statements or was it done in a personal capacity as an academic??
She had ample opportunity to stop putting her face in front of the cameras.
She wallowed in the publicity with s hameless pleasure. She repeated t like a parrot the safety bs..... she deserves to be safe but nothing more .if she ditched the pink hair and got a mullet she could try out for the silver ferns😂
You do that job and hair like that seems to me you would have heeps of confidence, i find it strange she would be so broken.
Me that’s the problem for her. She doesn’t like having to leave the public eye.
Here's the thing: Wiles didn't just give the public information, she gave advice, based in part on information ("facts"), but also based on subjective assessment of those "facts". This advice likely also includes her own personal biases and the government agenda which she was encouraged to support (by the government).
If the government really did "recruit" her to push their agenda, then they should be responsible for protecting her from the consequences. Suppose that I worked on a building site and the secret service recruited me to infiltrate a terror ring that was operating on that site. Who should protect me? The building site company or the secret service? Clearly the latter, I would think!
If however, Wiles gave all the covid advice purely as part of her job at the University, without significant government influence, then Wiles has a case IF she kept strictly to the facts (or kept sufficiently close to the facts). But she didn't! She gave advice that seemed to be based on a worst case scenario for covid. This advice put many people at a disadvantage, but it probably suited Wiles to work at home, on full pay, during lockdowns! It may have also fed her own sense of self-importance, being suddenly so relevant and widely quoted in the press. This is what I mean by personal bias.
It might be argued that Wiles was using the University as a vehicle to promote herself and push subjective opinions that suited her personally. If this is true, then I suggest that the University owes Wiles nothing but a termination of employment letter!
The case should examine whether Wiles kept sufficiently close to the facts when giving advice about the pandemic and whether or not it was justifiable for her to base that advice on the worst case scenario. If she was really acting as a puppet for the government, then they should be held responsible, not the University of Auckland.
You got it right .. funny alright. i'm not even an expert Lol. what a joke in 2023 . how ,intellectual we are supposed to be ,and the media are feeding us this crap. We are globally in the shit alright. like we are in the shit, if this is the pinnacle of the news media that we have to feast on. OMGS. Her and poor M Baker . shut me down for having a voice. Someone is in control . and I dont think its us. what a joke.
What does Wiles think the university should have done differently?
Looking at both sides of the story it is a very complex case. Was she working for the government but also within her Auckland University remit? She actually has a legit case. We should not judge her because of her weight or her hair - forget about that and be better - judge her on what she told us during the pandemic. Was it science based or paid government propaganda?? If I judge her on her science based info - she should take a 360 and tell the public it was all a bunch of Bullshit!!!!
She didn't know if it was correct or not because she has no expertise in virology or epidemiology.
This is how F up the world is . we are talking about her what the hec
What are they meant to do for her? Tell everyone on Twitter and out in public to be nice to her ?
Bad hair does not equal bad person.
Just equals a bad choice! Which she made and got paid for!
Siouxsie Wiles also appeared to covert celebrity, what was she doing on Give us a Clue?
if her position with covid and the government had nothing to do with the university and wasn't part of her employment with said university, she doesn't have a case for them to protect her in the work place, as it was her actions that put her on that position, and her sole responsibility to keep her business out of the work place, the same as if i had an argument with my wife at home , and she then came to my work place and hit me, its not my employer responsibility to protect me its my responsibility.
Why then cannot every person she affected with her paid for misinformation sue her ? If you are a attention seeking knob sometimes you get attention you do not want !
She's also very anti smoking 😂🤣🤣🤣
Might have a case against her hairdresser
Was her employer, the university, an extension of the government itself? In which case, by implication could she have felt, that once she was in bed with the devil she couldn’t get out and risk losing her career?
Lol looks like she did have a case after all!
The spelling of her name and her hair colour says it all
I think you mean infamous…🙄😏🤬
Why is she doing this now? Did she get used to be important and now wants attention?