Law in a Time of Crisis - Jonathan Sumption in Conversation - BridLit 2021

แชร์
ฝัง

ความคิดเห็น • 20

  • @traceyomalley3797
    @traceyomalley3797 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Cannot wait to read this I think he has always seen the bigger picture authoritarian regimes use fear thankyou Lord Sumption always enlightened by listening to you 🙏we live in hope

  • @jameshumfry1256
    @jameshumfry1256 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I greatly admire this gentleman. Wonderful thinker and speaker.

    • @jayturner3397
      @jayturner3397 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yep..he's never far off the mark

  • @lizgichora6472
    @lizgichora6472 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you.

  • @ciaranoregan3710
    @ciaranoregan3710 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    A voice of careful reason throughout the pandemic. Great chat.

  • @drilldrulus1235
    @drilldrulus1235 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Thomas Hobbs was a very instructive thinker on this subject of absolute goverment. And his argument was basiccaly very simple but it took an entire book Levithan to explain it Hobbs said the implicit bargain the people makes with the state it that the state gives them absolute safety in return they have to abounden all their freedoms and right for ever. The last two years be have been ruled by this principle. That was Hobbs view I hope all in here view this conclution as repellent.

  • @cecilefox9136
    @cecilefox9136 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I agree with Lord Sumption on the lockdowns.

  • @Johnconno
    @Johnconno 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Lawlessness in a Time of Crisis.
    Fixed.

  • @tedbo1819
    @tedbo1819 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is this the second edition? If so, is it substantially different to the first?

  • @Frohicky1
    @Frohicky1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    But Sumption isn't shouting his opinions in a loud regional accent. He can't possible be right!

  • @lennycarlson1178
    @lennycarlson1178 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    who were the judges he declined to name that recently left the bench?

  • @legalmonkey
    @legalmonkey 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    45:14 Coronavirus Act

  • @drtreg
    @drtreg 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How wrong he was about the EU.

  • @clem1300
    @clem1300 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Has an illiberal democracy (48:35) ever existed? Is there one? The very idea seems an affront to democracy, unless one is thinking of the tyranny of the majority. But surely one would not consider the latter a democracy worthy of the name. And one where the rule of law governs? In all probability what one finds there is rule by law.

  • @gayledavidson3788
    @gayledavidson3788 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you.

  • @drilldrulus1235
    @drilldrulus1235 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thomas Hobbs was a very instructive thinker on this subject of absolute goverment. And his argument was basiccaly very simple but it took a complete book Levithan to explain it Hobbs said the implicit bargain the people makes with the state it that the state gives them absolute safety in return they have to abounden all their freedoms and right for ever. The last two years be have been ruled by this principle. That was Hobbs view I hope all in here view this conclution as repellent

  • @drilldrulus1235
    @drilldrulus1235 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thomas Hobbs was a very instructive thinker on this subject of absolute goverment. And his argument was basiccaly very simple but it took a complete book Levithan to explain it Hobbs said the implicit bargain the people makes with the state it that the state gives them absolute safety in return they have to abounden all their freedoms and right for ever. The last two years be have been ruled by this principle. That was Hobbs view I hope all in here view this conclution as repellent