What Is It Like To Marry Into The British Royal Family? | Fourteen Weddings And A Divorce | Timeline
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ก.ย. 2024
- Chronicling the romantic life of Britain's royal family in the 20th century, this documentary explores the history of royal marriages and asks what's next for a royal family increasingly battered by media pressures and whose business is shared with the whole world.
It's like Netflix for history... Sign up to History Hit, the world's best history documentary service, at a huge discount using the code 'TIMELINE' ---ᐳ bit.ly/3a7ambu
You can find more from us on:
/ timelinewh
/ timelinewh
This channel is part of the History Hit Network. Any queries, please contact owned-enquiries@littledotstudios.com
Never get tired of documentaries featuring the wonderful Diana!
14 weddings and a funeral.
Not a single word about the successful marriage of Prince Edward and Sophie Rhys-Jones?
I know, it seems that everyone has forgotten that he is part of the Royal family.
This documentary was made before the 1997 death of Princess Diana. Edward married Sophie in 1999.
HRH Princess of Wales. I hope William reinstates this. She was loved by so many. 💛
Diana was such a Beautiful and lovely woman. There will never be another one as beautiful as her.
The world will always love
HRH Princess Diana💕
Not if they have any sense!! Diana was a betrayal of her family. Couldn't tell the difference between Royalty and Celebrity.
She was no "royal highness "
.
The women whose relationships she wrecked won’t love her that’s for sure.
@@ritahorvath8207 Girl bye with that. So phony.
@@barbaraholmes8647 No more than Charles.
Diana was too good for the royals, may her soul forever NOW be at peace
only when Diana blood gonna sit on the Throne King William ^_^
Blame Fergie for her indiscretion, but I rather doubt Andrew was the faithful husband
Fergie never insinunated this.. it was she who strayed... once they were divorced he was free to see other women
Diana Princess of Wales by title..... The People's princess Forever
Marrying into the British Royal family is one of the most difficult things for anyone who isn't part of the Aristocracy
Princess Diana.was awesome. God Bless her❣️ Her boys miss her sooo much.
Charles had a long time affair with Lady Tryon. Possibly others too.
Charles was having an affair with Camilla Parker Bowels née Shand. Since 1965 before and his marriage and before her marriage to Andrew Parker Bowles. Sidenote Andrew Parker Bowles was said to have been , one of the God children of the Queen Mother , Elizabeth.
@@tammielynne4089 Charles first met Camilla in 1972 not 1965 Charles left to go into the Navy and she married Andrew Parker Bowles in 1973
The relationship with Dale, Lady Tryon, was over before the marriage.
Jem Harper,
You are talking about a man who, since the age of 32, has had two women in his life- Diana, and then Camilla. Does that suggest to you that he has put himself at risk?
@@tammielynne4089 1965? Charles was 17 then.. and he didn't meet Camilla till he was in his ealry 20s
I take it this was filmed before Di died?
I can only find that it was released in 97...the same year Diana passed so I presume if it was released in 97 then it took a long time to film, edit and produce etc so its definitely a good bet that it was filmed before her death in Aug 97
So sad hearing about 'Diana in 30 years' time knowing that she died not long after the comment was made.
I thought charles was.very mean to her and thats why she cried in the bathroom. I thought she was a very special a. Kind Lady and I Love her very much.
Why don't we hear about prince Phillips philandering??
It's probably because of BBC protecting the crown lol
Did he? I wasn't aware of any even though he would go to The Men's Club where they would watch movies and all sorts of things.
@@montrelouisebohon-harris7023 I dont know if you ever have watched the Crown on Netflix but you should its based on actual events
Monterey Harris yeah he done her sister Margaret as well as many others I’m pretty sure he tried it with Diana as well. He put it about alright. That’s why him and the queen sleep in separate rooms.
@@davidbaker8957 you’re saying prince Philip banged princess Margret?!? Where did you get that information?
Yes, the royals had been heavy smokers some smoked more & others not all.
And stress from the War had played a part in his ill health.
David/ Edward was a playboy & immature & not one to want the role of king.
I think Berie didn't think he would be king, was not prepared for the role of king he was more mature than his older brother.
it's all rather fascinating.
As an American I'm interested in it but glad we are not ruled by royals.
The problem may not stem from the fact that there's "something about the royal family"; rather, perhaps, there's something about marriage itself.
100 %
👍
♡
Not a popular opinion, but Lady Diana Spencer wanted to marry into the Royal Family.
29:58 that glare!!!! Lol!
There is a little mistake in the beginning : Princess Diana had already been a Lady before she married Charles and became the Princess of Wales - she hadn't been a commoner ... Duchess Catherine has been a commoner before - or do I misunderstand anything ? I am German. ... 😉
Doris Daumann,
Diana was technically a commoner. Her title "Lady" Diana is essentially an honorary one, generally given to the daughters of Dukes, Marquises and Earls, but it does not signify that she, personally, is titled.
@@MandyJMaddison She was an aristocrat with royal blood in her background!
island girl,
The fact that her father was an Earl, and she was descended from Stuart kings doesn't make any difference. Technically, in erms of British Royal Marriage, and succession, Diana was a Commoner.
The only women who are NOT commoners are women who are Princess of Royal Blood, and a very few few women (about four or five) who have rare titles that pass to the female if there is no male heir.
@@MandyJMaddison Thank you for the clarification.
@@MandyJMaddison she was an aristocrat coming from a longstanding noble family..her family titles are older than the royal family ...she was actually more royal than the royal family...kate is a commoner same with Harry's wife they are not aristocrat or noble they are not minor bluebloods
"HELLO"
GIVE US BACK OUR INTEGRITY Hello 👋🏻
Glitter, glitter! 💎
The marriage of Prince Charles and Diana was an arranged marriage as well.
An absolute nightmare, i imagine
This is just an observation I'm not trying to be rude but that lady theyre interviewing with the dark hair makes Camilla look pretty! LOL🐴🐴🐴
RUDEEEEEEEeeee....
Tee hee hee hee ROFLAMOLOL
You are quite right... Lol
Jessica Bostick first off I apologize if you thought my comment was rude. I was just making an observation. I did say that I wasn't meaning to be rude.
Amanda I was just stating my opinion. I apologize if you thought I was rude
Rude .
.
Honestly. I think if she hadn't had children so fast the firm would have been obligated to help her out with camille. Because all they wanted was here kids
🤯🤯🤯🤯 girl, you better chill. LADY Diana Spencer was part of the British aristocracy!! Her ancestor was Sarah Melbourne!!
Sarah Melbourne
.
🤣
who is Sarah Melbourne?
Which one?
I didn’t know they considered Diana a commoner but I guess it’s based on if you actually hold the title and not a offspring or sibling of the holder of the title
Lady Diana Spencer was not a commoner but an aristocrat.
Did last royal queen this century. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.
Poor dianna we
At 38 minutes, that's also the man who wrote a book about Camilla!
Princess Diana had her criticism of being in the RF,BUT she never wanted to take down the monarchy because it is her one sons destiny. Too bad Harry the son she spoiled rotten doesn’t love his brother enough to be someone William can count on. Instead William is pulling the knives out of his back from his brother and TW. Also, Prince Andrew is very loyal to the monarchy and the RF not once has he pulled a H&M just because he won’t be king and there was a time he was the spare along with Anne.
I love what this woman says at 24:43 about how Camilla had a choice, how she knew what she was doing to the royal marriage and to Diana personally (whom she pegged for a dum dum) and continued with it anyway. I honestly don’t know how Charles’ sons could ever possibly ever accept her knowing this. If I were them I probably would have blamed Camilla for their mother’s death, because none of this would have happened if she had simply gone away and left them to work it out. The truth is that she was a homewrecker and if she truly was the faithful, loyal servant that Charles portrayed her as, she would have walked away the moment he got married. She didn’t, because she was a social climber and reveled in the attention, social position and expensive gifts that the Prince bestowed upon her. She played the long game and she won - she’s Queen now. But she cheated, she literally blew up the Royal Marriage for her own gain, I don’t believe for one moment that she didn’t know what she was doing, she literally encouraged Charles to marry Diana because she thought Diana was too dumb and to young to catch on to their affair. That alone shows how calculating and manipulative she is. It’s just sad that the British tabloids are spinning this whole thing as a star-crossed love story and shoving this uncomfortable lump down everybody’s throat, when there are people who still remember Diana’s Panorama interview and what she said about there being 3 of them in this marriage, and how it was a bit crowded.
Charles and Camilla you have to give it to Diana she gave as good as she got lol love or no love
These people know what they are doing marrying into a corrupt family at the top of a corrupt system of power.
We ask governments in all countries to unite the bridge pillars as high as one or two meters so that if a car hits a bridge support, it can still slide not as badly as a car crashes into a bridge pillar so that an accident hitting a pillar like what happened to Princess Diana does not happen again, sorry and thank you..
I don't understand what you mean. How could a pillar/ bridge support be able to fully support the bridge if it were able to slide? Surely the weight bearing down on the support would make it unable to move? Also, if a car did crash into a pillar which was able to move by one or two meters, the pillar would still come to a standstill and be an immovable object causing the sane damage to the car.
KERSKENS
Good God, Phillip really does look like Prince Harry. 😱😱
👀
I wish I could see it ...
👓
So taped before Diana died.
Most of it. They talk about her death at the end.
Well, how about it Charles...I bet he knows now...
Three people died, because of the Queen never dealing with the dramas of her children, it looks like things are coming back to haunt her, she never could face the facts, she has always thought the people had no right to know the truth. Well, Maj how about
telling us how sorry you are for not flying the Union Flag at half-mast as a sign of respect for Diana and her family, you really pi sed us off with that. you just could not handle that we loved Diana
3 people died because of Dodis' stupidity in using an untrained unlicensed driver and probalby ordering him to speed
More than 3 people have died at the hands of the RF....
@@miss.spent-youth1454 who exactly?
Diana died because she didn't wear a seatbelt that night. Diana thereby broke French law. Her choice, her mistake...
Never mind didnt got the love from the bawdy man. Just bawdy man. Very guesting
Anthony Holden doesn't know his royal history very well. He says he couldn't understand why Charles wanted to leave Diana for Camilla considering her looks. Hello! He was in love with Camilla! It wasn't about looks! He wanted to marry her but wasn't allowed to! She wasn't suitable so he kept seeing her after they were both married. They just fell in love! What an idiot this man is! Yes Diana was gorgeous but he was in love with Camilla and had been for a very long tome. If his mother would have just let him marry her in the first place he would have been happy but she had to satisfy the establishment. Do your background before you try to act like your an expert next time! And I'm from thr states for goodness!!!! (Don't get me wrong, I loved Diana, I'm just stating facts here)
People are extremely superfficial and dont want to accept that Diana however lovely wasnt at all easy to live with and that sehe wasnt the right woman for Charles.. but a rather plain woman was
Furthermore she was still a teenager when they got engaged and not a very mature or stable one at that.
@@glen7318 she'd probably easier to live with if he wasn't cheating on her
@@mariahyohannes and perhaps visa versa
@@shawroberts5149 Itdidn't matter if Diana was cheating. He wanted to be with Camilla and that's who he should have chose first
Charles may be serious but he is a cheat and slime he should deny the thrown
He also demonstrated poor decision-making skills. Why was it that Charles did not marry the love of his life the first time? What kind of man marries knowing he doesn't love the woman who plainly adores him? The crown's decision will indicate if they value this kind of man enough to endow him with the kingdom.
Marie Light HRH Prince of Wales could not marry Camilla prior to their subsequent marriages to others because she was not a virgin, and that fact was widely own in aristocratic circles. He was required by custom to marry a virgin, and I believe Lady Diana Spencer was even subjected to a gynecological exam prior to marriage. Obviously, that requirement is no longer in existence as the current Duke and Duchess of Cambridge loved together for years prior to marrying. Prince Charles had a duty to marry and produce heirs, and at 31 years old had not “fallen in love” like some fairy story plot, and was pressured to agree to a suitable match. The Spencer family was well known to the Royal Family, and Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother concocted a match between Prince Charles and the “suitable” Lady Diana. Obviously, Lady Diana was too young, immature, and psychologically fragile to understand the full extent of what she was stepping into, and Prince Charles was too selfish to completely change his well ingrained habits and personality to try to satisfy her. They actually magnified one another’s faults and made the other worse. And what possible “Crown’s decision” are you talking about? There is no decision to be made. When HM Queen Elizabeth dies, if the Prince of Wales is still alive he becomes King and the Duchess of Cornwall becomes Queen Consort. There is no picking and choosing from the line of succession. The only decision that could be made would be for the Prince of Wales to abdicate, and that will never happen.
@@bdub1863 Oh dear, I normally don't speak on topics I know poorly and was under the fog of a stout flu. I thought it was possible the Duke of Cambridge could be chosen ahead the Prince of Wales.
Also, I appreciate the tone of your email reminding me of the importance friendly discourse.
Camilla should not be Queen Consort... She does not deserve that position. She will never be as loved as Princess Diana...
Daniela De Ávila Its not an earned position, nor is it based on public opinion. The sole requirement is that she be married to the King. If HRH the Duchess of Cornwall and HRH the Prince of Wales both survive HM Queen Elizabeth, and they are still legally married, Camilla automatically becomes Queen Consort. Whether she is styled as Princess Consort or some other lesser title to mollify ridiculous public nuisances whinging about their irrelevant disapproval of her, the fact remains she will be Queen Consort.
I'm Angelina European.....dianne can from a commoners......prince charles is royal.....from blood...
My God bless you my mother in Diana princess of Wales
We are accepting camilla who was the cause of the ending of the marriage of diane and Charles. But harry love of his life did not break up his Marriage with another woman. Shame on camilla.
Lady Diana Spencer was never a commoner, she is a daughter of an Earl, decentant from Kings.
yes she was a commoner. So was teh Q Mother, So was Fergie or Kate Middleton
ROCAS
From commoner??? Lol! Is she talking about Middleton?.
Only Charles or the Queen can stop Charles from becoming king
Most likely will be Charles stopping Charles. Assuming QE2 doesn't outlive him based on her exceptional good health and long lived genes thanks to Queen Mother
Hope you right Charles needs to walk away but I don’t expect it can only hope Queen outlives him
There is no constitutional mechanism for HM the Queen to stop HRH the Prince of Wales from succeeding her as Monarch. If HM predeceases HRH POW, he becomes King. Only then could he abdicate, which will never happen.
Well at least it will be a short reign, we hope. God save us from a vindictive, narrow minded, petulant and entitled as a birthright, character. He had to keep quiet all his life, officially and had to write letters in secret. He will probably reinstate the Tower of London to lock away anybody that disagrees and chop off a few heads in the name of tradition.
@@magnacz that's absolute nonsense. Charles does not write lettters in secret, he writes to ministers about issues. He has tried ot use his position to do good, and make use of his influence and his weatlth to help people. He cannot reinstate the Tower of London as Im sure you know
And Harry has "genetic pain" due to Charles' parenting!
Princess Diana is not a commoner she is already a part of aristocratic family before she marriesd charles.
Kimberly Ongcal she came from a noble family but she was indeed a commoner.
@dimapez Only one member of any hereditary aristocratic familiy, the actual holder of the title, is considered a noble. In Diana's case, i.e. in the Spencer family, that was her father, Earl Spencer, and after his death, it is now her brother. The principle behind this is called primogeniture. The UK works differently from the European continent in this respect. All other members of the family (Diana's mother, Diana herself and all other members of the family, even her eldest brother while her father was still alive) are commoners, even though they are part of the aristocracy.
@dimapez A commoner is anyone who is not a peer in their own right (ranks of the peerage are duke, marquess, earl, viscount, baron). Members of their families, who are commoners and not peers, are given so called courtesy titles (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Courtesy_titles_in_the_United_Kingdom) - like Lady Diana, they remain commoners though. So Diana was a commoner, altghough she was from a very old aristocratic family. "Commoner" doesn't mean that she was from a middle or lower class background. Her life and would have been the exact same as that of a peer.
@dimapez when Diana was born her grandfather was still alive. Her father was known as viscount Spencer. Diana was the honourable Diana Spencer. When her father became the earl Spencer. That's when she became lady diana Spencer.
Kimberly Ongcal
“The word lady is a term of respect for a girl or woman, the equivalent of gentleman. Once used to describe only women of a high social class or status, the female equivalent of lord, now it may refer to any adult woman. Informal use of this word is sometimes euphemistic ("lady of the night" for a prostitute ) or, in American slang, condescending (equivalent to "mister" or "man").
"Lady" is also a formal title in the United Kingdom. "Lady" is used before the family name of a woman with a title of nobility or honorary title suo jure (in her own right), or the wife of a lord, a baronet, laird, or a knight, and also before the first name of the daughter of a duke, marquess, or earl.” Lords and Ladies are Nobility everywhere I searched it said nothing of Royalty
Yeah, I think heavy smoking for decades did more to hurt George VI's health than WW II did.
Flora Posteschild AND STRESS
Stress and cigarettes are killers.
He smoked but I know that he smoked more because he was far more stressed out since his brother left him boxes and boxes of work that was not even opened during the brief time that David was King Edward. David had his mind on one thing only and that was the woman he loved and certainly wasn't being King. David wanted to serve England, but not as king .Eveb King George V knew that David wasn't mature enough and he didn't have what it would take to be the kind of leader that England needed. King Edward V believed in Albert and even though Albert was second in line for the throne, Albert ( Bertie) King George VI was definitely the king and leader that England needed after his father's death. King George 6 LED England through the Second World War. He was the second born but he was so much more mature and he always gave everything of himself and didn't ever take anything in return. David, temporarily King Edward, was Peter Pan and a boy that didn't never want to grow up. The woman that he was in love with did not want him to give up the throne. Sadly, Wallace and her husband Ernest began this adventure with the teacher King Edward as fun and games. It did not turn out that way and they found old letters that King Edward's wife was riding to her ex-husband two years after she married King Edward because she was really still in love with her ex-husband and did not want to marry Edward. I'm sure she would have wanted to marry him she thought she would have had a chance of being Queen, but doubtful. She didn't really want to do anything around the Royals and between Wallace and her husband Ernest they were both having flings and pulling around. Nobody had any idea that the Future King Edward would fall madly in love with Wallace Simpson.
Flora Posteschild We’re you King during a World War ? Obviously born after the War was history !
Especially at that time I believe they were non-filtered.
Lady Diana was not a commoner. She was Lady Diana Spencer of Althorp.
Diana was an aristocrat, but that still made her a commoner. Her title was Lady Diana Spencer. There was no of Althrope.
@@samanthaallen7556 Correct her father was 8th Earl Spencer not 8th Earl Althorpe
*Her father's family side had ties to being the man of the stool.... or something to that.. Back in the day, that was one the best jobs to have with the king they say! The king would most likely give whatever you wanted..*
Yes. She was more noble and British than Windsors
She wasn't royalty.
Caroline of Brunswick also died unexpectedly and young about 3 weeks after her estranged husband's coronation, she was also far more popular with the people then he was.
That’s food for conspiracy thought 💭 lol 😆
Only because George was so much hated. Caroline was no heroine...
When they make a movie about George Floyd
Yall think JUSSIE SMOLLETT Should audition for the role.
After he's released from PRISON of course.
33:27 "Obviously happy that her (the Queen) favorite son..."
I doubt he's her favorite son now in 2019.
Gerard Collins 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Prince Andrew always has been and always will be her favorite.
@@donnalynn2 Answering this now in 2022. You're absolutely right. This is something that actually really annoys me when people criticise Prince Andrew and other Royals but speak of the Queen with nothing but utter flattery. She is protecting Andrew. If she decided to she could order him out of the Palace (which is essentially like international waters legally) to face the music. But no, he's hidden behind the gates ever since all of this came out. The Queen is allowing him to do so and is funding his legal efforts.
29:11 - “It could be that we may see in 30 years time Diana living in exactly the same position ...”
Gosh, I wish that had been true. 😢
One of the saddest cases of 'this didn't age well'
if ' few' would have learned
english
l a nguage incl grammar
... they would know ThaT The word
may had diff meaning in sentece
now whos born monTh
May
Zodiac sign
Twins Zwilling , who has
Twin siblings ? WE have had no
+ were i have ever lived + live
was
no T enough ' space' for
Silly
'cows'
my Zodiac sign is Taurus
am born
on
4. 28 1966 my age
55 have no Time for
[silly]
acTions
@tori2dles: " . . .may see in 30 years time Diana living in exactly the same position. . ." Tragic though her death was, I think her reputation would have been diminished had she lived longer. Had she remarried, the press would have excoriated her; ditto if she had a series of short-lived relationships with other men, or even one long-term relationship. When she worked with the Red Cross on landmine removal, the British parliament accused her of being a political loose cannon. She was trapped in a no-win position both politically and personally.
The Queen: “How did the little interview go old boy?”
Andrew: “No sweat my lady!”
why would he say that?
I think they are all bloody arrogant the only thing they do for this country is embarrass it
This lady is clearly a friend of Charles's. To say that all Diana had to put up with was one mistress is pretty sickening. Time has passed, they're married and happy. But it all came at a price and in the end a lot of misery and pain. Very cold to have such a dismissive attitude towards that. He shouldn't have married Diana when they hardly knew each other.
In truth though, Charles DID only have the one mistress and it was someone who he always loved. On the other hand, Diana had at least 7 known lovers and who knows how many unknown? It amazes me how everyone chooses to overlook how much worse Diana was. Highly hypocritical, especially given that several of Diana's lovers were married and she knew it.
@@dianewalker4633 x
She should not have married him. Did he force her?
@@dianewalker4633 ikr. I grew up as a huge Diana fan but now it sickens me to see how the western media has always glossed over her infidelity when hers were much worse, she too wrecked homes. To add to that, her fans use Charles, her failed marriage, and the RF as excuses to slack her. At least Charles was with one woman and if he was given the chance initially, he'd never marry Diana.
@@afrinsayed5902 I'm the same as you in that I also followed Diana. In fact, I was a nanny in the same area as her at the same time and I recall seeing her in a corner shop prior to her engagement. I knew who she was and remember being surprised at how badly she was dressed! I saw her again a year after she married and she had come completely out of her shell then. I ended up being so disappointed in who she became. Her public work was wonderful, but her private life was a train wreck and she was highly vindictive. Sometimes it's best not to find out what a person is actually like because often we come away disappointed. This was the case for me, sadly.
*9:09* "far from ideal parents." That's one euphemistic way of describing neglectful and outright abusive.
Diana was a great but troubled woman.
It’s a shame though that her youngest is disrespecting her legacy and name.
Harry is not disrespectful! You are WRONG
its not all that surprising. Both parents IMO spoiled him, like a lot of divorced parents do. And I think that Harry was always flakey but for years, he kept within certain boundaries and the RF covered up some of his wobbly behaviour.. but Meghan encouraged him to burst out of the royal bounds
I don't think he's disrespecting Diana's name or legacy. In what way do you think he has done this?
by making a break from the Royal Family?
Ok. Yes.
@@miss.spent-youth1454 seriously? He has written a book attacking his brother, called the RF racist but refused to say who was being racist, claimed that he should have free security, the list is endless
Not going to lie. I watched carefully for signs of Andrew sweating.
Hahahah
Were there any couples who were truly in love and compatible with one another...and dare I say happy?
They are no where to be found.
The Queen and Prince Phillip most of the time.
Edward and Sophie are happy.
I think Harry and Meghan are compatible like that.
Lauren Padgett Agreed this generation is, Harry and Meghan, William and Kathryn definitely.
Why do they call Fergie a commoner when she grew up on a 3million dollar estate? As well as Kate Middleton whose parents are millionaires? MeGain Markle is as close to a commoner as anyone can get but they kept calling her a well known actress, which is hysterical considering 95% of people had no clue who she was until she was known as Harry’s future wife... are they trying to make the Royal family appear relatable by marrying ‘commoners’?!? Because the women who come from money are closer to the Royal status than they are commoners; that plan isn’t working if that’s the aim.
They are still commoners if they dont have royal or noble rank. Obviously they are from well off families, as if they werene't they're not likely to have met and socialised with various princes
Everyone except for the monarch is technically a commoner.
Not for nothing but being topless and having your toes sucked ( by someone not your husband) in front of your daughter is not only common but downright vulgar. There is your Fergie. Seems that her growing up on an estate didn't help. Oh and the pictures were published for all to see so there is no two ways about it. That is why the Duke of Edinburgh could not abide her.
@@michaelmulvey6753 no, there are monarchs, royals, peers and commoners. but in the UK only a peer is of noble rank, his children and younger siblings are commoners
The princess was so uniquely beautiful! I'm always mesmerized by her and I can't explain it.......
9
The Queen wouldn't allow, the Prince Charles , to remarry ; until Princesses Diana death.
That's wrong. Charles didn't marry until after the Queens mothers death.
@Jem Harper watch Unlawful Killings: The Murder of Princess Diana. Straight facts - They definitely had her killed.
@Jem Harper The secret service killed Diana.
@@gabriellechanel7076 That film does not explain everything....much more to it.
Not true. Charles was free to remarry once he and Diana were divorced but the odds were that he would wait a few years. And in the end he waited until after the QM died. By then the boys were grown up and the queen was ok wiht it
Margaret's divorced too!
Morgan Lowe and Princess Anne
@@narrakasa81194 yes but that was after Margret, before her though it was Henry Tudor . So when they act like it was the only they are out right bold face fibbing.
Damn they’re talking about Diana like she’s still alive how old is this??
It's says it was released in 97 so same year as Diana died.
@@miss.spent-youth1454 thanks
Too many ads :(
YOU WILL ALWAYS BE THE PEOPLES PRINCES TO ME DIANA
Always ❤❤❤ agree with you
Agreed! Always and forever 💗💗❤️❤️
Rest in peace Diana and Dodi .
⚘🕊
All of these Royles are basically prisoners!
How could Charles desert Diana, William and Harry He failed them all.
How did he desert them? Diana was the one who started to look for a divorce... she wanted out of hte marriage, at least in some of her moods. Charles did not desert his sons
@@glen7318 but he did upon making the conscious decision to continue an affair with Camilla Crapper Bowls. His family paid the price for is infidelity.
Commoner just means she wasn’t a royal. The Duke of Edinburgh was a prince before his marriage to ER II and therefore not common.
A commoner means someone who isn't born into royaly, nobility or the aristocracy whereas Diana's family was aristocratic. Therefore I don't understand why she has been labelled as a commoner.
@@miss.spent-youth1454 technically everyone except the sovereign is a commoner.
@@miss.spent-youth1454 because her family are noble - not royal. In noble families( wherein the oldest male carries the title) every one else gets courtesy titles and is considered commoner ( like Lady Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon and Lady Diana Spencer).
There will never ever be another Princess Diana. She was so genuine, so much a people's princess and she was so loved by everyone. She graced us with her beauty, her warmth and her kindness. Never again will we see another like her!
What exactly she was so different in from Kate Middleton for example? Genuine question. I don't know much about her.
@@0912sooli KATE is so insignificant and doesn't do anything good, doesn't do anything for good causes like Di used to do.
@@rosytheriveter2538 She does about the same amount of work.. Diana didn't have a very full programme of engagement in her first couple of years of marriage. Kate was part time becuase William was not then a full time royal...
Not everyone, that is very wrong.
Diana was one of a kind ❤
Hearing Diana basically begging for some bit of privacy is sad to hear and witness
When they make a movie about George Floyd
Yall think JUSSIE SMOLLETT Should audition for the role 🤔
After he's been released from prison of course.
Begging for privacy . How many times did she ring the paparazzi to tell them where she was. Mixed up girl for sure. Didn't know what she wanted or perhaps she did . Attention admiration celebrity status. Played the cameras and the people. Look up BPD for the Answer..
Come on .. marriage ain't all it's cracked up to be .. for royals or anybody else 🌹
I know, but...they had to have some couples who were happy together...right? At least, somewhat.
True but most people to don't have to Murder thier , espouses, in order to remarry.
How very true
@@RikodiusRex Okay . sure .. if you say so
Tammie,
That story was put about by Mohammed el Fayed.
He didn't want to take responsibility for Diana's death which was caused by
1. Fayed hired a car with problems, and damaged seatbelts.
2. Fayed hired a driver who was not properly licensed, drove dangerously all the time, and was on medication.
3. Fyed hired security who didn't take proper care of Diana, because FAYED was paying him. He SHOULD have said "no, the car is dangerous, the driver is dangerous. there are no seat belts" But Fayed was his Boss, not Diana.
The people responsible for Diana's death were the Fayed, who did not take proper care of her.
The end, the music and the pictures left me so sad for the lost past and what might have been and the troubling now.
This ROYALTY woman is defending Charles for having only one mistress 😳😙
COMMERCIALS ARE TERRIBLY INTRUSIVE. UNABLE TO VIEW THIS DOC. COMFORTABLY. NO THANK YOU!
Fast forward to the end and restart. Gets rid of ads
This was such a good documentary until it became a Diana propaganda film at the end. No word whatsoever about how she manipulated the press and public into thinking and seeing her in a way that she wanted. Not necessarily the truth. But hey ho.
It is rarely reported that she studied the papers every morning and was disappointed when she wasn't on the front page, calling the Paparazzi to tell them where she was going, especially with the boys .... but it is the sad truth ...
Diana wasn't the first so called "commoner" to marry into the royal family, different royal family to be sure, but Elizabeth Woodville was more "common" than Diana and she married Edward IV. I think the better word to use would be "Subject" since Diana's family & Elizabeth Woodville's were not foreign princesses or foreign aristocrats, but true English women who were subjects of the crown.
Woodville was low ranking Lancastrian nobility with Eizabeth being the daughter of a lowly Knight.
Their divorce also was not the first Margrets was
@@morganlowe3353 True!
@@morganlowe3353 There were other divorces before Pss Margaret, for example Princess Victoria of Edinburgh
@@glen7318 yup!
You couldn’t pay me enough to marry into that family
Hrh diana princess of Wales pedigree was impeccable,she was related to all the royal family and charles is a 8th cousin
so were most royal brides. Camilla is related to Charles as well. And she was not HRH Diana Princess of Wales. When she became Diana POW, she lost her HRH
@@glen7318 but that doesn't make sense. She became POW on her wedding day aswell as HRH
@@miss.spent-youth1454 when she married seh became HRH THE Princess of W. then she los the HRH on hte divorc
DIANA'A MODERN PRINCESS'SO MISSED🦋
Well John Bryant hasn't made a peep, yet!
19:51 long or short well we know its gonna be very long #immortalqueen 🙃
An 18-19 year old writing a 13 year old Elizabeth... these “royals” are so nasty 🤮
Whats' nasty about it?
If you don’t see it then you are part of the the problem 🤷🏻♀️
@@zukibetancourt8488 what problem ?
8:57 Prince Albert Futur King George VI look like a male version of Princess Elizabeth the Queen =D
God appointed men, not women, to be the priest that carries the Word & teachings of God to women & children. He appoints rulers for the purpose of bringing these messages to the world. England's 'royalty' has long ago stolen the thrones of countries in order to ignore God's laws as they chose to worship themselves & the pleasures of the world. This is evident in the characters of all 'royal' members of England in how they live their lives. They do not bring God to the people, they bring self-glory, greed, lies, deceit, adultery, fornication, lust, pedophilia, love of money, cars, planes, ships, clothes, crowns. < Idolatry is what has become of their true purpose. The world & politics, money & fame, not God, has become their purpose.
brava tesoro
I can't believe that brittan let's these bums live off there taxpayers money .they haven't caught on yet.
The RF actually contribute a significant percentage ~20% of Britain's GDP. Without the RF, tourism would cease to exist to the bleak, rainy/snowy island of England with all of it's bland native food (not counting Commonwealth citizen culture like Indians etc). Fact of the matter is the RF IS the primier reason why tourists and world in general remain fascinated with England.
The Royals have PLENTY of their own money. And, the Queen still holds legitimate power.
mary brown *their
@@pamelamyers9613 Yes but the problem is that
1. Besides a trust, most of the RF wealth is tied into physical/real assets like land (i.e. the land owner/steward for the ENTIRE island of England is the Crown. Whose reigning monarch is still QE2).Unless you receive a grant of land (the likes of the Duchy of Sussex, Cambridge etc), from QE2, you're NOT a land owner but a tenant. Something that is an alien concept to the likes of me a Yankee here in the US. LOL
2. QE2 has had to spread her fortune/estate among her many children/grand children and their heirs. Which is even less amount since
3. QE2 was forced to pay taxes AND take the bulk of her welfare family of minor Royals off the British tax payer's purse. So this is royals not in line of succession under Charles like Prince Charles siblings, QE2 sister Margaret's heirs etc. and other minor royals like her 1st cousin the likes of Prince Micheal of Kent etc)
@@simsdiver5201 I guess the people of the UK will figure it out.
I saw someone on photo,she was from British royal family and perhaps was young and unmarried and I am quite comfortable but issue is I have no point name of god and my child could become deformed in birth but we can share marriage as friend and if need could adopt a child
Beautiful golden wedding royal wedding
And after all these years both Anne and Margaret’s sons marriages ended
Poor Diana and the rest of the royals now she’s gone
Rosalinda
I AM GLAD DIANA IS NOT AWARE OF ALL THE STRESS OF THE ROYAL FAMILY NOW
She is not commoner, she is daughter of Earl Spencer and Viscountess Althorp. Her grandmother is Lady in waiting for the late Queen mother
Lucy Ruru,
I have left a really detailed explanation for why Diana WAS a "commoner".
But I will repeat it.
Diana didn't hold a hereditary title. Her title "Lady" Diana was just a courtesy that is usually given to the daughters of aristocrats. By protocol, she didnt have any special status unless SHE PERSONALLY was awarded a peerage, or unless she married a member of the Nobility, and shared her husband's title e.g. Duchess of Cornwall.
In the UK, there are just a handful of women who have hereditary titles. One is the Queen who is Duke of Lancaster and Duke of Normandy. Another is Countess Mountbatten of Burma. There are a couple of female Lairds in Scotland.... but it is very rare because these titles generally only pass through the male line, and die out of there is no male heir.
So Diana was commoner. So was the Queen Mother, Lady Elizabeth Bowes Lyon.
So, regardless of their aristocratc backgrounds, and their courtesy title of "Lady" both these women were OFFICIALLY commoners.
Diana was not royal.
She married into it.
And the late queen mother was a commoner too.