Can SCIENCE disprove GOD? London Atheists & Muslims discuss!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 25

  • @peace99786
    @peace99786 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    These videos are always so calming ☺ Jazakamullah to everyone who's involved in making these discussions

    • @AlHakamOnline
      @AlHakamOnline  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Glad you like them! More to come stay tuned.

  • @ABT-ns1w
    @ABT-ns1w 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Nice discussion!

  • @crssft
    @crssft 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    💯

  • @rhett_rydinhood
    @rhett_rydinhood 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    _"Can SCIENCE Disprove GOD?"_ - No.
    'Can SCIENCE Disprove YETI?' - No.
    'Can SCIENCE Disprove UFOs?' - No.
    'Can JUDAISM Prove GOD?' - No.
    'Can CHRISTIANITY Prove GOD?' - No.
    'Can ISLAM Prove GOD?' - No.
    So what?

  • @BunnyNiyori
    @BunnyNiyori 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Well nothing says coward like deleting my comments.

  • @BunnyNiyori
    @BunnyNiyori 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Fortunately, I'm not dumb enough to NEED to win a pointless discussion on the internet.

    • @AhmadiyyatCentenary
      @AhmadiyyatCentenary 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Is this conversation happening about beating someone over the head with a certain viewpoint?
      Regardless, what is there or is there not an answer?

    • @BunnyNiyori
      @BunnyNiyori 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@AhmadiyyatCentenary unsure dear, no atheist is going to lose sleep if a religious person refuses to accept reason over unsubstantiated belief.

    • @AhmadiyyatCentenary
      @AhmadiyyatCentenary 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@BunnyNiyori
      What if the religious person's viewpoint is based off of logic and reason, and the atheist is being unreasonable?

    • @BunnyNiyori
      @BunnyNiyori 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@AhmadiyyatCentenary sounds like a dog chasing their tail. The reason the religious are unreasonable, is their dislike for reason. Do you understand the meaning of reason?

    • @muzammiljamil3830
      @muzammiljamil3830 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      But you're dumb enough to think you are being rational, while instead you are just exposing your extreme bias against religion.

  • @BunnyNiyori
    @BunnyNiyori 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Science is NOT required to disprove something that has not be proven to exist in the first place. The burden of proof is on the assertion there IS a God. It is not my problem to support an assertion that has not been given anything to disprove. There is no God until you demonstrate there is. By the way, wanna see the dragon in my garage?

    • @bhattibhatti9494
      @bhattibhatti9494 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's not even what they are discussing. It about IF science has all the answers, it doesn't. Religion can answer a lot of what Science can never even begin to answer.

    • @BunnyNiyori
      @BunnyNiyori 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Religion is a fabrication of lies to control the gullible and the weak minded. And that's being kind. Religion is the tool of the primitive and the under educated and the scared and timid. Science is ONLY about searching for answers. It never claimed to have all the answers. It is not obligated to give them to you on a platter. Religion is a cop out. If you think religion has answered any of your questions, then you are dumber than even I think you are.@@bhattibhatti9494

    • @asherchoudry3345
      @asherchoudry3345 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      yes and the fundamental demonstration is the fulfillment of the numerous prophecies present in The Holy Quran and other previous Holy Scriptures.

    • @rhett_rydinhood
      @rhett_rydinhood 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@asherchoudry3345
      Let's assume your are right.
      How do you come from 'a prophecy has been fulfilled' to 'god exists' ?

    • @rhett_rydinhood
      @rhett_rydinhood 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@bhattibhatti9494
      Anyone can give answers where science doesn't yet,
      but an anwers is worthless if it's truth can't be shown.