OJ Simpson Trial - March 28th, 1995 - Part 1
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 31 ก.ค. 2016
- OJ Simpson trial from March 28th, 1995. (Carl Dougls, Marcia Clark, Robert Shapiro, Testimony From Witness Kato Kaelin, Testimony From Witness Rachel Ferrara, Johnnie Cochran, Testimony From Witness Allan Park, Raw, Uncut)
I can’t wrap my head around how this became an attack on Kato by Marcia Clark.
she tried tricking him into admitting to things through her perception of his smartness but you can't get a person who is being honest to go against the truth. he out smarted her by accident. and he bore the brunt of all her previous failures in the case up to that point.
I haven’t watched his entire testimony yet - I’m curious to see if she hammered him on the McDonald’s timeline. Destroying oj’s alibi said with kato’s honesty
in online pvp gaming parlance she is what you call a try hard
I can’t even listen to her examine him. It’s not that she is harsh it’s that she thinks she’s tough
she was also snippy with his friend rachel who is her literal link to finding the glove at rockingham as she corroborates kato's testimony about the thumps and the timeline. however all this is moot the jury was gonna acquit no matter what they admitted it was for rodney king/start stuck by OJ and all that. OJ made in america is a great history of this
Man does Marcia Clark ever ask stupid and useless questions. And she asks them over and over again. Really bad prosecutor.
shapiro and cochran must've thought to themselves "lol, she's doing the work for us". the harder she tried throughout this trial, the more her case was falling apart. all this while she had to watch shapiro, cochran and oj with smirks on their faces. after seeing kato's testimony up to this vid, i think clark was the major reason for oj's acquittance
The reason for OJ’s acquittal is the racists in the jury. The misogyny toward Ms. Clark apparently lives till today. You dimwits don’t understand the timeline being established here.
Eh, I think it was Fuhrman and the entire LAPD being incompetent
@@RistofecI think it was Ms Clark. The officers could have done a better job taking notes and such but Ms Clark spends too much time dueling rather than laying out the time line and the evidence, of which, she had mountains of.
Now I understand why they lost she talks to every witness like dirt
The jury hated her
I have found Clark and Darden to be unprofessional.
I agree. She unwittingly lost her own case
yup! She was desperate!
omg she's asking the limo driver his work history and how he was trained to drive the limo no wonder this went on forever!
Irrelevant questions the whole time. Did you practice the first time you got a job driving? Jesus, no wonder he got off.
Prosecutors for this trial did a horrible job! Huge mistakes.
Those questions were absolutely irrelevant, she hadn't smart questions to make! Now, by the timing the limousine arrived it's clear that O.J Simpson wasn't at the crime scene. I just wonder if he doesn't know who did it because the white Bronco wasn't parked outside when the limou arrived... 🤔
The questions go towards his ability to drive and the question of the space in the Simpson driveway...totally relevant.
L L exactly, ppl don't get it.
Lol! Kato ran out of that courtroom!!😂
Geez Marcia same questions over and over... how is the jury maintaining their attention?! I am struggling here
Agree. I'm rewatching this 27 yrs later & still feel the same way now. Kato was a witness for the Prosecution & the only person to establish a detailed timeline on June 12th besides Alan Park. She was repetetive in her questions then became aggressive.
Thnx for the upload
Kato was so undermined here. This man was not a professional ANYTHING. Just a random person under the severest scrutiny regarding a situation that was so overwhelmingly beyond his control. Literally a victim of terrible circumstances. Who the hell would want to be involved?! This horrible situation put everyone involved in this case under the microscope . Honestly felt sorry for him. Also, everyone involved in this case (Detectives, family of both victim's, lawyers, OJ, judges)had plenty of opportunities to prosper (books,interviews, movies, ) and last but not least Marcia who really hit below the belt in this.
BAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA!!!! Oh if you only knew just how involved Kato actually was. He was paid by the mob to cover multiple details that would have incriminated OJ in just 3 words.
Anyone who thinks Kato is just some random innocent bystander is the textbook definition of "naive".
Oh, the poor poor liar that has admitted he was perjuring himself and hated the verdict that he helped to create through his perjury.
Marci just drags on and on repeating questions
Thats what good attorneys do.....but unfortunately she was too inexperienced to be an excellent and brilliant one!!!
@@LB-pg3nothat's why her ex husband Gordon clark kicked her to the curb. Annoying stanky bitchh
Marcia's witness yet she's treating Kato as if he is the defense's witness. She was so angry. LOL
Basically she thought he was FOS, knew about the murders and lied for OJ.. While OJ was obviously guilty, Kato to me was just a dumb, mooching, bystander. He knew next to nothing..
Marcia: How did you know that it was 10:30?
Witness: Because I looked at the clock.
Marcia: How do you know that it was 10:30?
Witness: I looked at the clock.
The same old round and round by Marcia Clark. Grrrrrr
Mind numbing ! No wonder the jurors deliberated for 3 hours, 9 months of Marcia’s irrelevant questions.
Limo driver keeps rolling his eyes at Marcia🤣
Marcia Clark Had been writing her book during this trial.. and Kato hadn't.. WTF
Stunning is M/Clark did not ask Mr .Kato what hair gel he used , bath soap, tissue . Her questions are desperate .
BRADY MCGUIRE I’m floored that her line of questioning, regarding his legal representation, was not sustained after objection. Does he not have the rights of every American to seek and retain representation? I know I wouldn’t be questioned without an attorney, or two, in a high profile murder case! I’m stunned that she could get away with it. 🤨
Ahahahah it's interesting seeing how unprofessional the people on this trial were....
I really don't see how hair gel bath soap and tissue are relevant to a double murder.
The prosecution were so far out of their depth, I find it hard to believe that Marcia Clark had a high win rate in murder cases. Her questioning of witnesses and presenting to the jury is like comedy hour only the hour went for 9 months.
Clark; one of the worst attorneys ever. Poor questions, desperate, whiney, always complaining, bad faith offerings, unethical practices and almost anything to win tactics. Horrible!
Always wondered why she was made a fool of but with the questions she had asked, no wonder why!
This stupid woman thinks she is so clever, terrible lawyer
I can't believe the audacity of Clark. She portrays him as a gold digger and what is the first thing she does when the trial is over, writes a book for money. The swamp.
And she and Darden both got big bonus checks
And it was OJ that wanted Kato to live at the house for free! Who wouldn’t take that deal?
The “swamp” lol trumper 😒
when you try to call your own witness a liar, you are not a smart lawyer. or even a mediocre one for that matter, Marcia. and why on earth asking the witness about the time of the call, when you can ask the phone company provide the precise time of call for her number?
Wow, in 1994 it was possible to pick someone up in Brentwood at 10:45pm for an 11:45pm flight from LAX ???? These days it takes an hour to reach the AA terminal once you hit Century Blvd! 😂
It was late though
Yeah when it’s 11 pm at night - duh
It's late at night. Everyone's home by then.
Ridiculous that in a murder trial that either side would ask a witness why they had an attorney
It's rich that Marcia calls out Kato doing a book, movie and having a lawyer but Mr Fuhrman had lawyers in court and lied in court and got three years probation only!
DEBBIE SLOCK good point!!!
Mark Fuhrman was the only person in that trial that received any punishment.
He should have received a life sentence for planting evidence, it became obvious that the evidence that they had was enough for a conviction but they wanted more". But: "You don't carry blood evidence to a crime scene and then have a preservative EDTA show up in the blood of the suspect and then having the lead criminalist change the initials on blood evidence collected at Bundy and Rockingham. Lead investigators taking evidence home and then getting caught on video footage after lying. Even the prosecution team at time was guilty of withholding evidence until the last seconds and then trying to squeeze it in. In retrospect this case would have gotten a conviction, but instead it put an entire Justice system on trial for an entire nation to see. Some chose to ignore it as this is how you handle them?, because he's guilty. Others seen the corruption and chose not accept the circumstances under which the evidence was collected and by who. It became obvious that falsifying evidence was a major factor to convict OJ Simpson, but in the end it backfired because the District Attorney's Office chose not to look at the evidence as it was and one witness that told them everything they needed to know about the chain of events that occurred that night. Allan Park was the only creditable witness in that entire trial no motive for anything for or against OJ Simpson. He arrived early by some 20 minutes at 10: 35 he started ringing the gate bell,no answer, he's facing the house 10:45 he's kinda concerned about weather OJ is home; he makes a few phone calls all coincide with the time that he seen a shadowy figure entering OJs house at around 10:53 PM at the same time he spotted Brian Kalain standing in the pathway holding a little flashlight. Allan Park once again calls, this time there's an answer, it's OJ, he said he overslept and just got out of the shower! 6 minutes later OJ is dressed and downstairs luggage outside ready to go. 11:00 pm. There's no way in hell OJ Simpson could have entered that house wash up all that blood and change in six minutes. Who was that person that entered OJs house? That's the question that the District Attorney's Office never wanted to investigate two people involved in this murder case, who was that other person? That's why OJ didn't set the alarm system when he left for the airport, he even asked Kato did he know the alarm systems code; Kato says no. The next time Kato hears from OJ it's 11:40 pm, he forgot to turn on the alarm system. That's the time needed for who ever that was to vacate the resident. Ms Clark's continues to go over and over the same question to a point that Allan Park becomes unsure whether or not he's seen a bronco or not even to the point of admitting under cross examination that he wasn't looking for a bronco, it might have been there! But his timeline was soiled, but instead the chose to waste time on Kato and a bimbo girlfriend who added absolutely nothing to the prosecution's case a total disaster. In the eyes of Justice the eyes aren't blind it's the head that's turned in the other direction and refused to see the truth about a system that will railroad the poor and innocent, because they lack the resources to fight for Justice or in OJs case hire the best lawyers in the country to represent him.
Ms Clark, Darden and that entire prosecution team was totally incompetent in handling this case instead the District Attorney's Office played this case out for court tv justice and got exactly what they deserve exposed as unqualified to handle a case of this magnitude.
They even closed the case files on this murder of Ronald Goldman and Nicole Brown Simpson. Where's the Justice in that? Whoever that second person was is still out there!!!
Who cares how he’s paying his lawyers? Leave him alone!
Exactly! They gotta get paid some how!
That eternal throat clearing by Marcia Clark makes me want to scream. Irritating
She needed water to clear her throat asap
She's a chain smoker water won't help
Can somebody explain why the prosecution is suddenly so concerned about Katos living arrangements, questioning why he had such a low rent in the guest house? The low rent was already established by the prosecution themselves, but somehow that didn't raise any red flags until after the trial was well underway? Who thought it was a good idea to bring this up during trial instead of well before? I mean if you've got a star witness to establish the timeline, shouldn't you dig deep enough so that there's no question about that witness' motives and credibility etc? Very poorly handled.
FudgeYeah - Yeah i think you touch on something there, along with many others about many different things in this trial that are strange that way... "Why during the trial, instead of well before?" ... Maybe the main theory of Betty White on here is right, and rather than "red flags" we're talking about "*false* flags" here... (shrugs)
Any normal person would realize it’s strange to invite a man who isn’t your friend to live in a guest house bungalo for free . But when you put the part together with the fact that Kato lived with Nicole in a guest house for $475 a month and then when Nicole was to move , she invited Kato to live in a room in her new house - it doesn’t take a genius to figure out OJ made Kato a better offer because he didn’t want Kato living at Nicole’s place for whatever reason .
First of all he didn’t have low rent , he had NO RENT -
Lol . Secondly it’s common sense to think that OJ tried to sway Katos loyalty . Unfortunately for Marcia her questioning didn’t help matters
A limo driver named Park is perfection.
Damn.. Mr. Shapiro is smiling during Kato's re-re-direct because he's watching the state frantically try to destroy the credibility of their own witness, all because he asked the right questions, in the right manner & at the right time..👏
Did you see her face during the cross examination of the criminalist Ms Mazzola . Ms Mazzola didn't bat an eye as to yes or no she wasn't lying for anybody. I thought Ms Clark was going to die from coughing up her lungs.
Kato did an overall pretty good job. He came across as being very honest and credible
Good lord yes! This man wasn't OJ agent and yet Marcia expected him to know all his personal affairs
Did Johnny Cochran just get the girl to admit that the reason her and kato are no longer dating is because of Marcia Clark? This guy is brilliant
Her lawyer told her to stay away, not Marcia
Marcia's weeks long cough was very annoying.
she's a smoker
Furthermore she is not practicing social distancing. Mister Simpson should have had this bullshit case tossed on that fact alone.
@T Luka Well how is that her fault? You also get annoyed when people sneeze, breathe, drink or eat. Please, get a life.
This was the problem with the case Ms Clark is taking on defense lawyer one after the next. Out witted by the defense team she will not relinquish her control over the case,other then the science experts she singly questioned just about every witness. The prosecution team lost this case on Ms Clark's greed to prove that she was as tuff as the defense team. Ms Clark child custody battle plus divorce case got in the way of her judgment to prosecute this case. She was using this case to prove that she can do both take care of her family problems and do justice for Two other families in a murder case.
Look how relieved he was when Judge Ito said he was excused
Was Kato not allowed to have legal representation like other Americans? You’d never go into any interview without legal representation, regarding a first degree murder case anyway. I don’t see her point in embarrassing him for exercising his legal rights. Wow.....I’m really put off by that. 🤨
Edit...it is NO argument to question someone who is using his constitutional rights to legal counsel. It should not have been allowed by Ito. It’s inappropriate, and a low blow. You’re born with these rights.....use them.
Not to mention fuhrman of all ppl suing anybody lol
Supposedly his attorney told him not to talk at preliminary. They were gonna hold him in contempt so he choose to. I assume she held a grudge, not saying shes right. Of course u need a lawyer, but I assume she was taking out her personal feelings on him.
Marcia is such a hypocrite she wrote a book herself. She truly makes me sick
The fact that Marcia and Darden have brought up the "payment arrangements" numerous times with witneseses knowing how much SHE made off this case its laughable. God, she is every inch of unlikable that her reputation preceding this case indicated. Not to mention, awful at her job. $4 million for her book...irony.
The difference between a limousine and a 'stretch' limousine is a limousine typically is built by the factory as a nice car, a lot of times they're used for funerals... a STRETCH limousine is a regular car, that has been cut in half by a carriage company and then stretched into a longer car. New rails, new side panels, new roof panel, new windows, etc. It's like an aftermarket mod.
Very interesting. Explains stretch hummers.
How difficult are they to drive if any of you know? I know its not like climbing Everest, but ive never driven one. Do you just have to turn wider than you would with a regular sized car or? Im so bad at parking in general, I dont think id want to be a limo driver and have to get through tight spots or u turn lol.
Why do people feel the need to explain things we understand. We arent Clark, no one here asked that . Guess it makes u feel smart, must be dumb in real life n do this to feel smart.
It is so frustrating listening to Marcia Clark, so many useless questions that have no bearing on the case. GET TO THE POINT ALREADY MARCIA!! No wonder they lost, the jury had no clue what the point she was trying to get to by the end of her million questions.
And the length just pissed jury off and they saw it as the government was responsible for holding them the prosecution thought oh boy we better cover everything otherwise the better lawyers over there will catch us on something we missed well as we all can see now terrible idea it's like any competition doesn't matter who you are playing stay true to what you are good at what your stengths are and expose their weakness I tried listening to the coroner it was a joke days of useless questions the jury needed to know how they died how many wounds proove it was a right handed person and how long it would take to do the crime a couple days at most instead I couldnt even get thruogh it was so terrible I lost track of what they were trying to get across and I listened when I could imagine being there for weeks listening to useless crap thats what got him off the jury was so pissed at the prosecution the evidence didn't matter no one could follow and imagine the DNA part exhausting this was simple and they made it hard imagine if this were any normal person 2 weeks and a guilty plea
Kato is so fucking funny for some reason. I bursted out laughing at his reaction to the two glasses of water at 4:00
Or how about ‘we’ll we weren’t going for the same parts’
I always loved Kato😂
This is so interesting.
"Tell the arrow where to go" is getting real old...thank goodness technology has improved.
Cochrans look over at Clark at 46.20 , lol, brilliant.
I watched this trial in it's entirety when it was aired originally. I have the same thoughts then as I do now however, with the hindsight of 24 years, I understand why I felt the way I did then but time has taught me why I felt the way I did. I believed then, as I do now, that OJ Simpson killed his ex wife and Ron Goldman. The evidence is overwhelming. However, the prosecutor, Marsha Clark, seemed as though she was a novice lawyer. She was distracted and left an evidence trail that was almost impossible to follow. Her case was disorganized and left one searching for the logic in her repetitive questions of the witnesses. Instead of this being about OJ's guilt, it smacked of lawyers dueling as to which one was greater at the art. Marsha had something to prove and it was not that OJ Simpson was guilty, it was that she was a master lawyer. She failed at both. It's not that the dream team was so great, it was that Marsha Clark was so very bad. She lost the largest case of her life not because of the dream team but because of her STERN belief that SHE, was the dream team. Prosecutors always have the upper hand. They have the resources and the money to completely end a persons life, They use their powers, as a state attorney, as if it they were God with infinite and all knowing. In this case, the prosecutor run head long into her own trap. At least she is not serving 30 to life for a mistake in judgement. How many innocent, poor persons had Marsha Clark put behind bars before this happened? I'd like to think of this as justice, all be it in a twisted way. Yes, OJ killed his wife but Miss Clarke will not be his punisher. Marsha Clark was not trying to prove that. She was trying to prove how great she truly is! I can not discount the truly stupid thing the LAPD did as pertaining to evidence custody and Mark Furrman was a nuclear bomb to the prosecution. Why did not Marsha foresee this? If I were a juror, my verdict would have been not guilty. Not because I didn't believe OJ did it but because Marsha Clark did not prove the states case.
@chuck Well Chuck, thank you kindly for your judgement concerning spelling errors however, the spelling was intentional. It seems that it went right over your head. My post was not a rant, it was my opinion which seems you can't handle very well due to your emotional age. I followed the trail through it's entirety so, yes, I do have a knowledgeable opinion concern the trial however, in the end, it is my opinion. Your post added nothing to conversation.
@@bain5872 I don't know, it was a *little* bit of a rant lol , but you are informed, rational and use your own head to form an opinion, and explain it well, so thank you for your input :) And you may be right about Marcia Clark, i'm thinking it's either something like the picture you paint about her there OR it's something much more sinister and the reason for her unbelievably disorganized case is that she DID know it was.. I find the idea that she was "novice" etc (as she seems) strange, also we know she gets help from a whole bunch of people and if you see where i'm going it just doesn't make sense and has me looking for other explanations... Anyway i certainly agree and believe that a lot of prosecutors in this world are getting focused on their "job" to convict people, get a target and run with it all the way regardless of.. anything etc etc.. and that when this is the case, it is X times worse than a defense lawyer trying to "win at all cost" because convicting innocents is UNACCEPTABLE... i say let 10++ criminals go free if that's what it takes to ensure 1 innocent doesn't get convicted (there was my rant lol).. And i don't understand how anyone can be so callous as to try to convict people without knowing 100% you're right and losing many nights sleep through the process.. to me being in that position, or even a juror would be a heavy, heavy burden.. And about Marcia Clark, i too have seen things so far, right from the beginning of the preliminary hearings that give me such an impression about her character... i wouldn't let that guide me to an emotional jury-vote though (wagging finger) lol
The Dream Team is an best.
I like Kato; he seems honest.
Cindy Manzanarez
You can see how nervous he is too trying his best to remember dates and answer the questions and knowing how many people are watching. I know I would be a nervous wreck.
Cindy Manzanarez I think he got so confused between Marcia using the word upset, for angry, and sad. She should have used context, or use angry or sad. Not upset for both. It’s confusing.
DYINGGGGGGGG
Yes, but he may have a little credible if he didn't live off OJ Simpson. Kato did not have a job, an lived Rent Free. I believe that he was looking for an acting Job? He did not have to pay anything.
Kato and his girl look like they have the same hair stylist. A cute couple.
lololololol
Looking forward to watching part 2
Shapiro with the Matlock suit lol
How Kato is paying his two lawyers is irrelevant to the case. Defense is reaching. Asking Speculatory questions. Hours the lawyer has worked on the case?.. She "speculates" herself says over 100hrs etc.
Kato is the only reason I watched the trial..
At 1:12:15 mark, the limo driver curses in a whisper but the mic picked it up 😂😂😂
You mean Allan? And yes. I heard it too.
Marcia Clarke seems to be questioning Kato like he’s the accused? Wasn’t he called upon by the prosecution? I’m confused?x.
Why are you confused ? obviously Kato was conflicted with loyalties to both Nicole and OJ . He wasn’t an easy witness for Marcia because he didn’t always give straight up answers .
Marcia, is such a big hypercrit asking him about money when she had every intend to do just that after the case. She didnt even know OJ & as soon as she knew it was a celebrity she's milking it big time, she talks slow to get her 5 minutes of fame. she is unprofessional not strong at all.
Can't believe her objections at the end of the previous clip (march 27th), over questions about OJ and Nicole trying to 'work it out'. There's 2 sides to a relationship, with children. Nobody knows the 2 of them, as unbiased as kato did. Who the hell is she to shake her head, as if she knew them.
What’s a hypercrit?
She NEVER should have had him try the glove on
She didn’t . Chris Darden did .
I just love Carl Douglas. Have you seen him in "OJ-Made in America?"
Maryann G I enjoy his cross- examinations
Maryann G and Jasem Bin Hussain - Oh yeah, enjoyable like a rootcanal... which *is* preferable to the dementor-soul-sucking of watching Cochran in action i grant you lol
Agreed. I think hes vile and an arrogant know it all.
1:12:13. Does the limo driver mumble ‘goddamn’ ? 😁
Good catch, I wonder what he was reacting to there
I heard that too, rewound it, and laughed again.
Marcia was just out of her league in court. I think she would've made a terrific law clerk but she's just not great with the examinations except for a few high lights.
The hypocrisy of Marcias is just unbelievable ... trying hard to make Kato and his ex girlfriend look bad because they where probably gonna make some money of this case, then a couple of months later she signs a 4.2 million dollar deal with Viking ... 🤢🤢🤢🤢🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮
Mr Kato AKA Carmex moisturizing lip balm
Ms Clark's lost of control over her witness Kato was just terrible, asking about things that Kato knew nothing about in 1989 or OJs business habits and dating affairs with other women was definitely out of the scope of her questioning. Ms Clark seems to be more interested in who OJ was dating instead of linking him to a reasonable time frame. Instead Ms Clark was pushing the witness to agree on things he knew nothing about. As a result of her line of questioning, even after her failure with Kato Ms Clark continues her attitude toward the other witnesses concerning Kato's conversation with them she even spent more time with the limousine driver questioning him about Kato's demeanor and what was he doing. These three witnesses where very critical to establish a time frame that could have linked OJ to the murders. Ms Clark kept Kato on the witness stand for a week only to badger the witness and try to declare him a hostile witness because he wouldn't say that OJ was upset to her satisfaction. Now she's asking irrelevant questions of Kato's x girlfriend . No wonder they lost this case.
AND THIS IS WHY GORDON DIVORCED THAT KAREN BI^%& MARCIA CLARK
Did Marci think the limo driver committed that crime? That’s how she talked to him.
@1:49:31 they pull up phone records of Allan Park calling his boss , but when trying to obtain phone records of Nicole Simpson to her mother ( who by the way was on phone at 11pm) the courts didn’t want to release the information. Mmmmm funny thing.
1:41:52 should absolutely settle this whole case. There was no white bronco there. Period. End of story. OJ was not home, which means he lied about "oversleeping" and the only reason he would have lied about that is to cover up where he was. A very WEAK alibi. And Cochran even panics and gives a weak objection that is immediately overruled.
That should have ENDED it! Period. Guilty!
@@sdssteward They could have had OJ on video committing the murders and that jury still wouldn't have found him guilty.
They knew friom the restaurant phone call, what time Nicole called the restaurant around 9:30 about some lost glasses! Ron Goldman was still at work, he left according to co workers at around 9:55 went home and changed drove to Nicole's condo around 10:15 pm and from that point its anybody's guess, but one thing is for sure when a neighbor found the dog with blood on it's paws it was around 11:00 pm they were dead already. The timeline couldn't fit. Between 10:00 to 11:00 is their window, but OJ Simpson couldn't be in a limousine and at a murder scene, that wasn't discovered until 12:15 am. I've heard of that phone call scenario, but if that where true OJs attorneys would have gotten those phone records. "Hey they found those tapes against Mark Fuhrman. They sent investigators to Italy looking for those shoes, most definitely they would have brought those phone records in court had Nicole and her mother were on the phone at eleven o'clock. Just look at who they brought as a witness some bimbo girlfriend of Kato that absolutely had nothing to offer offer then Kato was an honest person. Ms Clark and Dummy Darden were the worst possible prosecution team in the history of jurisprudence.
They literally got outlawed by the defense team on every witness even Rosa Lopez made Darden look stupid instead of sticking to the time she saw the Bronco it ened up about her collecting unemployment and her immigration status as a permanent resident of 23 years and a weeks worth of testimony never was heard by the jurors. She got to go to El Salvador after all. I can't believe that after all these years this trial still has the attraction it had almost 30 years ago.
It's a cold case file now that will never be challenged, because the DNA evidence doesn't match from Bundy that they collected at OJs resident.
"They blood typed the Bundy crime scene and DNA OJs blood evidence at his residence. That's why in their closing Ms Clark was trying to explain DNA instead of the experts. I wish ,I could have seen the faces of those jurors during the closing arguments, because the look of the people who were in that courtroom was like what the #u@k is the prosecution talking about. This was a murder trial, not a domestic violence case.
This is moronic. BOTH the defense AND the defense had equal access to the phone records. Both parties stipulated to the authenticity of the phone records. Are u suggesting that there is a phone record of a conversation between Nicole and her mother after 11 PM AND THE DEFENSE DID NOT PRESENT THIS. U are a moron.
@@kennethcharles1386the dogs were first heard barking at about 10.20pm. OJ wasn’t accounted for until about 11pm
If the limo driver had just stayed at the Rockingham gate, this whole case may have been different.
1:41:52 should absolutely settle this whole case. There was no white bronco there. Period. End of story. OJ was not home, which means he lied about "oversleeping" and the only reason he would have lied about that is to cover up where he was. A very WEAK alibi. And Cochran even panics and gives a weak objection that is immediately overruled.
That should have ENDED it! Period. Guilty!
In fairness, had the limo driver caught OJ coming home, his attorneys would have just concocted a story about him being somewhere else.
The thing is, its moot. Id bet my life that there is NO evidence that could have been introduced that would have made that jury find OJ guilty. They were blinded by three things. Celebrity, race, and distrust for the LAPD, not necessarily in that order lol. Even before Fuhrman and race, Tom Lange stated everytime he looked at the jury when he testified, he received looks back of distain.
While we all can Monday morning quarterback, I dont think they would ever have convicted him. Its absurd with the CRAZY amount of evidence there was. These murders were some of THE WORST ive ever seen committed, and I dont even mean in terms of gore. OJ did a TERRIBLE job that night. Literally the only thing he did right was getting rid of most of the clothes he wore.
Slam dunk isnt even a strong enough term to use when we are talking about Simpsons guilt.
Did Kato only testify in March 1995 or were there other occasions? Apart from in 94 that is.
He didn’t want to leave because Mark and him had some things to do. The whole glove, bang and Kato thing seems strange.
Poor Kato. Wrong place, right time.
Poor Marcia, that girl was a Mess! Sad. Her and her little Sidekick, Chris. smh.
Why does Marci act like Kato on trial? She is very unlikeable just in her demeanor. And what is the point of all these questions. Don't they have any better. Is it really a question of moment whether the guy had knew how long the limo was. It's almost like they don't know what questions to ask. Really " why were you looking for an address" DA because I was looking for his address. Her question just make her sound stupid.
1:20:33 you had your front window with you? what a gentleman.
Did you back up? Yes
Did you do that by going in reverse? Yes
What an incredible lawyer!
Did the box make a noise when pressing the button? Yes
Was the noise a buzz or a ringing type sound? Ahhh I can’t remember
Marcia had the largest contract on a book deal of anyone that did a book associated with this trial. Funny she calls out Kato on it
I remember watching much of this trial live on Court TV. Even then, I was struck just how unorganized, and at times, unprofessional the prosecution seemed ton appear. Now, I understand that none of those on the prosecution team were paid anywhere near that of any two on the defense team, but I would expect a few of those on the prosecution team would at least give the defense a run for their money. Some 25 odd years later and I still cringe when Marcia Clark opens up her mouth at certain points. If I prosecuted this trial the way Marcia Clark did, I would't expect to be employed very long after the conclusion of the trial.
agree
Different times - disorganization aside, female attorneys during the 80’s & 90’s experienced a very different professional reality than those of today. My mom worked as an attorney during that period in Los Angeles and actually knew her personally. She might come off as an overly assertive, if not outright aggressive individual at times but behind the scenes women truly had to live up to the moniker of b**** to respected by their professional communities - especially in such a male-dominated (at the time) field.
Not excusing her conduct, but it’s honestly something to consider.
1:41:52 should absolutely settle this whole case. There was no white bronco there. Period. End of story. OJ was not home, which means he lied about "oversleeping" and the only reason he would have lied about that is to cover up where he was. A very WEAK alibi. And Cochran even panics and gives a weak objection that is immediately overruled.
That should have ENDED it! Period. Guilty!
What does pay have to do with quality of work. The prosecution has the entire justice system and it’s resources at it’s disposal. OJ personally had to pay for everything. The tax payers didn’t pay for it.
@@Jeromemayle you should go see the new vid on my chnnel regarding the Simpson case. It's eye opening.
Protective of someone he should not of been
What the f*** is wrong with M.Clark? I can't believe how she is acting. And in the years after the trial she talked so bad about the Kato and Furhman, prosecutors witnesses. Unproffesional and just bad. Darden and Clark did a bad job, really bad job here.
Katarina extremely hostile. No wonder the jury hated her. She definitely plays a part in the not guilty verdict. Her questions about his attorneys, his legal rights to legal representation, was in poor taste......who wouldn’t seek representation. And, if it came to you for free...you’d definitely take it. What a bitch! 😠
You’re right about Clark but not about Darden. I was never a fan of cocky Cochran or Shapiro.
Katarina Agree 💯!!!
Pommie bears absolutely. She was being a little bit catty because the witness was gorgeous in my opinion. Even with the other Witnesses she acts as though she's dropping a bombshell and then nothing. Cocky is in a good look if you're bluffing or thinking you're better than you really are.
Agreed
Kato was everyone's punk.
I don't get the reason she was going after kato. He was a witness for the prosecution and Nicole's friend. He said he knew 100% it was oj. Doesn't make sense. Kato said he was even confused.
At 1:12:16 Allen mutters “god damnit”. I wonder what he’s thinking.
He realised he forgot to turn the iron off
Limo driver has a nice manicure... 🤣
GAWD..Park thinking this is biggest dumba$$ attorney EVER !!!
These question has nothing do do with finding a killer
Just tell the story it all over now even Rob kadash said unsure
Rachel was OJ's type
cutie
The park and clark show starts at about 1:08:00
i always fast forward past karl douglas. his voice and whole being is like fingernails on a chalkboard
You just know he was the kid that everyone picked on in school.
Isn't it true!
Jeeeez! Racist much?
@@MutedGrowl - nothing to do with skin color
Excuse me, is this the O,J Simpson murder trial, or is the the trial of Kato Kalin house guest🤔🤔🥴
The one thing that puzzled me was the girlfriend’s testimony that Kato told her to call the police about the thumps. She tells Clark she didn't take that request seriously. She has been told, or asked about was there an earthquake. Because he had heard a noise on his wall. To me that was a strange comment. It could have been an intruder out there why wouldn't she take him seriously? Plus, he was her lover at the time.
Love this Judge in full control and fills in the blanks that the attys miss lol
These California people are so spaced out 🤣
I'm surprised that the defense team had enough space to work with the size of Carl Douglas's and OJs heads taking up so much room over there.
rrmond LOL. Literally! I was thinking the same thing!
🤣lmfao!!!
Ahahahah
Well that was an unintelligent comment.
That was not necessary but LMAO!
Alan Park looks like that comedian who lied about being at the WTC on 9/11.
Poor Kato
He knows the shit what happened here
Allan Park’s got quite the cocky attitude for a minimum wage limo driver.
David kayto really had favor with people a 30 something year old man living with a wealthy celebrity for free after not really knowing him. Andl living with OJ ex and children after meeting Nichole in the Aspen with a group of her frta few years prior. He only paid Nichole $500 and babysitting. He also received free counsel and representation from multiple lawyers with the promises of if he makes it 😂. Wow this has got to be the luckiest man in history. I paid $600 for a shitty apartment
Look how she is attacking her own witness, the prosecutor had a habit of doing this throughout this trial same kind of adittude with the limo driver and several others. The problem is that everyone is trying to make money even the prosecution team had secret book deals but she's asking the witness the same thing that her and sorry Darden who started crying after they blew the case,but they made money on the case.
No wonder they lost the case.
Douglas's hair game is fucked up!
Rachel Ferrara sounds so cocky and uptight. How did Kato put up with her?
People you are forgetting Kato is one of the important witnesses in this trial. Other than Mark Furhman. He hears the thumps on his walls. So, that ties into the timeline. Also, other than the limo driver, and airport workers, they saw Simpson before he left for Chicago. If OJ committed these murders and that bloody crime scene I was always astonished at how he cleaned up so quickly and took care of a cut on his finger that it wasn't noticeable to people at the airport.
ok maybe i missed something but why all these incessant questions about times of phone calls did they not have access to phone records between kato and his gf? i mean they put up a big board for when kato called his friend tom in san diego with toms phone # on blast lol
21 did you feel obligated?
WHY DID SHE WAIT UNTIL NOW TO BRING BOOKS AND ATTORNEYS INTO IT
aww Kato 😍
Kayla Burns people really slag him off....I always thought he was ok. Just nervous 😟
Language Arts writing score 360. .mathztivs 260. Mathematics 390. Total score 1960