@@mazuzu3451 If the atheists would look at real science and not lie like they do with evolution as mutations cause cancer not "evolving" as Dna and Rna are written like co-op languages, or lie like they do with monsanto or saying cigarettes are healthy, and saw it as a whole same way if previous scriptures looked at their scriptures wit honesty they would be Muslims. Islam is simple and for anyone and a Mercy but it has a strong foundation and can build! like Humans are made from dirt humble and low but things grow from ti while fire stands tall but burns down! There are all the proofs in the world but we need to be humble. May Allah make it easy for us. Amin! I advice you to stop being a weak racist self humiliating devil worshipper who in your hate admits you are inferior and we are superior with your jelous hatred... just become a decent human being!
@@mazuzu3451 so humanity is a joke to you atheists, you defeat yourself as your purpose is to worship Allah alone! atheists built no civilization and all Prophets peace and blessings be upon them's message changed but point to Islam the preserved faith, humanity as a whole tesitifes Islam is true, this mean Allah is Just, Most Merciful, All Wise, present in the Sending of Prophets and signs of the last day. this is just history signs of the last day are coming true, so time itself testifies Islam is true. Whats bigger is the universe, Earth has 7 layers and Quran says EArth made 2 days and Heavens in 6. modern science is humbled by Quran as Earth is 1/3 age of universe as science shows. Islam puts science to the test and it was a Muslim who made the modern science method. Allah says He creates in pairs, and dna and rna are written like co-op languages one can't survive without the other and took millions of years to form meaning they were made at the same time. While mutations in science don't cause speciation but cancer, the moment from non life to life is a miracle but atheists attribute it to death, talk about contradiction, while Islam knows the answer intel design, Allah is all Wise Creator and Merciful. Islam has 5 pillars to built a community, 6 pillars of faith and 5 pillars of preservation in society, faith - as stated earlier atheists built no civilizations , 2 health Islamic hygeine taught europe ghusul preventing plagues, and now with c. virus its said to come from bats and swine eaten in marxist china who oppose Islam which forbids it, if they would of embraced Islam instead of fighting it maybe the world would be safer 3, mind Islam is preserved by Allah as our basis for humanity and we seek knowledge as stated a Muslim made the modern science method, 4 Family - the same science shows ppl aren't born astray like the marxist science liars show, but the nuclear family is best and we teach marraige and honor 5. Money - we reject sinful money like usury making rich richer or stock gambling stealing others wealth or selling drugs pornography hurting the other categories as Islam is a balance- againt the atheist lawless vulnerabilities and judeo marxist tyranny which paul turned christianity to eventually and now sweeps through china, Islam is the middle path between 2 mountains or to say the valley path! as Malik Shabazz Aka Malcolm X said Oneness of Lord will = ONeness of Man Insha Allah but we start with Tawhid, pillars and Manhaj Sunnah wa salaf! So Humanity, biology, civilization, past, future, time & space all testify to Allah so you are only a joke in reality of reality, but you can return as Allah is Most Merciful! Bismilliahir Rahmanir Rahim - With the name of Allah begin in Allah's Name the Most Merciful bestower of that Mercy! Hadith All children of Adam sin but the best of those who sin are those who repent!
All the counter videos against MALM are aimed towards his behavior and character instead of the substances of his argument. Counter his points not him for god’s sake.
"Mufti" is going after the hadeeth exactly like the shias, apparently he is not shia but hadeeth rejecter. People know hadeeth is the explanation of the Quran and if you discredit the hadeeth, it will be easy to (mis)interpret Quran as you like. This can be seen in the case of Christians who don't have the sunnah and the ahadeeth of Jesus thus end up interpreting bible as they like.
Hadeeth is not explanation of Quran. This is the biggest misinformation. Hadith is only “heard knowledge” which the prophet gave in form of advise to certain people. It was never meant for mass transmission. Only Quran and Sunnah is mass transmitted. Hadith is not Sunnah.
I am currently debating him right now on his lecture about Osiris being Usair in the Qur'an. His lecture is being adopted by other scholars and word-for-word retaught on their channels, as well as being shared through popular channels such as The Believer. Hopefully he will perticipate fully in the debate and the results of our discussions can be made available to the Ummah for everyone benefit from. I am a revert to Islam, alhumdulilah. I was raised in a non-religious household with the freedom to choose my own faith. I was fascinated with the imagery of ancient Egypt when I was four years and was fond of studying their culture and religion as a hobby. The first religion I committed myself to was Wicca, where I partook in witchcraft and worshipped gods (including Egyptian) from different cultures. Thus I have studied nearly every prominent pagan religion to some degree, as well as LeVeyan Satanism and Baphmet Satanism. I also have some knowledge in early church history and the comparison of modern Bibles to thr Codez Sanaticus. This started at the age of 12, and I was studying to become a High Priestess of magic. At the age of 20 I began to shift my belief system to Kemeticism (Ancient Egyptian religion), where I left witchcraft and the other deities and dedicated myself solely to the Egyptian religion. I joined a Temple and began my studies in the hopes of being a priestess of goddess Het-Heru (Hathor). The woman which I studied under has a PhD in Ancient Egyptian studies and focuses on translation of Heirolgyphics and Coptic texts, as well as religion. She has been on some of History Channel's documentaries regarding Egyptian religion. She established the Temple that I studied at in the 80's after she, too, left Wicca just before becoming a High Priestess. Her legal name is Tamara L. Suida, however the Temple regards her as a legitimate Pharaoh. I also, informally, studied from resources outside the Temple to gain a broader knowledge. I was planning on pursuing Egyptology after I had finished my military career, of which my job was Chinese intel translation. (May Allah SWT forgive me for the three months I was in the military while being a Muslim, supporting the terrorist kuffar and being unable to wear hijab on uniform). I would like to state that although I don't have a Mufti-equivalent level of knowledge pertaining to the Egyptian religion, I do regard myself as decently studied. Being highly educated in Egyptian religion is difficult as there is a great deal of flexibility within the faith and many truths that co-existed but also contradicted at that time (such as more than one creation story). If there are any flaws in my debate I am open to discuss these flaws, but I tried to extensively fact check everything through multiple sources before stating the information. I am now planning on picking up my studies in magic and ancient egyptian religion, as well as paganism in general. I am also planning on starting shari'a school. I want to be a Sheikha who is able to help the pagans, and also educate the Ummah on the truths of magic and paganism from my own experiences. May Allah SWT guide me and keep my heart clean of pride, kufr, and shirk during my vocational journey. Jazakhallah Kheir
May Allah keep you steadfast till the day you meet him. You have a good intention, but I would advise not to waste your time in debating that particuar matter with him for two reasons. 1- This man has more serious issues that if he understood what he is saying, scholars would have made Takfeer/Tab'dee of him. 2-You are a beginner student. Do not open that discussion with someone like him. He will divert you and put a lot of doubts in your religion. Learn your religion properly from reliable sources and leave that sourcery related knowlege even if you think theres benefit. This is my advice, you can take it or leave it. Barakallahu feek
@@MadeEasySeries I understand he has more knowledge when it comes to the Qur'an and Islam than myself, however for that particular topic knowledge of Islam isn't really needed. If you watch the video you would understand. I feel it is a duty of every Muslim to speak out against fitnah. It is alright, after sending only one response he has yet to read anything I have sent him for days. So, I don't think this will go anywhere. I just hope my comment gets read on all postings I found of the video, and the Ummah protect themselves on this one. It is all that can be done for now. I just want to learn some basic Arabic so I can get accepted into the Shari'a school in my area.
@@MadeEasySeries In addition, I have seen a compilation of all the thibgs he says which contradicts the deen. However with this topic there are a plethora of scholars, Sheikh, and average people like ourselves that can easily identify and ignore his obvious lies. However on the topic I am debating him on not even the scholars have the information that I have to refute. On that video people are showing support and agreement in the idea because they simply don't know any better and he makes everything on the explination sound logical. Scholars and Sheikh lack experience in this area. That is where I can give them resources and information to help them, until I become a Sheikha myself. However I have contacted all four Sheikh and scholars who own The Believer channel, and messaged the the channel's email, Instagram, and Facebook. No response was given from either of them. So if they will not do their duty to remove the video after being shown clear evidence then I have to do my part. Otherwise I am not doing as Allah commanded, which is to forbid evil. I will not stop until the video is removed.
Seriously....? Only personal attacks on Abu Layth? No substantive response? No response on the legitimate question regarding the source of the Bukhari book?
Akram. With all due respect, you are saying that this guy is "strawmanning" but you misquoted this guy as well. Was that intentional? Yes, i have been following both of yours banter both ways, but what Abu Layth says is "Dont say Bukhari is the most authentic and keep it in par or above the Quran in authenticity". He says that many many times. So brother, you misquoted him absolutely.
I don't think that it's worth listening to this Abu layth(clown) who say Easa ibn Maryam will not come again. This liar is denying Quran in many of his videos just to prove his point of view. All he wants to belittle Sahi bukhari by comparing with Holy book at the same time denying its Ayats. Quoting or misquoting him doesn't make any difference.
@@syedhussain2656 So you are just denying what he says without reasoning? What are your thesis's to do that? If he is wrong, prove it by an explanation with evidence, not just insults and rhetoric.
@@shohorabahamed3753 Sahih Bukhari is not kept on par with the Qur'an - Abu Layth has said many questionable things - he looks for ikhtilaaf and pounces on it then presents it to people who know no better if it accords with his desire, he also places reason above revelation in denying the explicit wording of the Qur'an about miracles and magic. Whatever his intentions, he is in the wrong.
@@husnainkhalil2554 You are right. Sahih Buhari is not kept in par with the Quran. But brother, it is elevated more than the Quran. It is a fact that a lot of Muslims throw the Quran away and claim some verses are abrogated and some of ther verses are neglected but the Sahih Buhari is all adopted in theory. This is a fact. My parents did it, my madrasa did it, my jamaat movement did it, all my life they threw the Quran over the thames and held on to the ahadith. Its fact.
Such a weak point against Abu Layth! You haven’t addressed the dodgy Hadiths which attribute absurdities to the prophet (pbuh) - which is Abu Layth’s main point. What you guys don’t seem to realize that whilst Abu Layth is fighting for the honor of the prophet (by audaciously challenging Hadiths that lowkey disrespect and insult the prophet), you guys are simply fighting for the status quo to be maintained.
Ahmed BA He’s a bonafide qualified mufti with Ijaza in these things and he’s also a hafiz of the noble Quran (mashaAllah may Allah preserve and protect him). I doubt if he has declared everything halal like you said. I don’t remember him declaring rape or murder halal for example.
@AkhiSalafiyyah who else but yourself is the shaytan? lol funny how you ignorant lot always have a self-righteous mentality. Abu Layth is a Hafiz and I can bet a substantial amount you ain’t! Yet, u come here yapping with ignorance. May God help you lot.
Sunni 4 life Alhanduallah Allah guided you. Be great full brother these Dajjal type characters are everywhere. Be careful where you take your knowledge. "Knowledge is deen so be careful who you take your knowledge from"
We will see more liars like Abu Layth soon. They are the product of this age. But Allah is all seeing. Allah will bring all such people to end. It's just a matter of time.
Farid invited him to debate, Layth accepted but then backed down, because Farid wanted a neutral moderator to coordinate the debate and not a student of layth.
Ha, it's December 2020 and Mufti Abu Layth is more popular than ever. Fact is there are many more Muslims like myself who share his views. He always provides proof for his stances and always has an open invitation for anyone who disagrees with him and woukd like to have a civil discourse on the subject. What he never does as some of you do, is call those who do not share the same view/opinions derogatory names. Mufti Abu Layth is a breath of fresh air. Thank Allah swt for him.
i dont know these 2 people but bukhari has weak hadiths even shiekh albani and ibn hajar and others have pointed to this and many others have done jarh on saheeh hadith books and imam abu hanifa only accepted mutawatir hadith because he was concerned about fake hadiths but nowadays people who call themselves hanafis mostly use daeef hadeeths wa a change to the madhab
Al albani (la) said that Aisha ra could've commited zina and he has weakened many sahih hadiths. And about the criticism about hanafis, keep it to yourself. You're a joke. I'm not a hadith rejector btw. This is a comment about Al albani and hanafis.
This was a weak video. People talk about his behaviour and im just waiting for proof. YOU dont need to defend Imam Boekharie, only show proof that all the ahadith in Sahih Boekharie are claimed Sahih by Boekharie himself. So this doesnt show in any way that abu layth's challenge has been met. Not in any way. You are just shaming him for being excentric. But for God sake we know already. Now we want to see proof. M3a Salama
That would require actual work, knowledge and the sincerity and honesty that it would demand following it´s completion or once conclusions have been reached. A simple HDI analysis with a short look at the assessment made by the World Bank will indicate that people from that part of the world, at least in their nations of origin, are not defined by high productivity, conscientious hard work and intellectual excellence. That is for all to see and is not my personal opinion. The issue with Bukhari is just a symptom. The deeper lying problem is that too many Muslims today simply do not have sufficient insight into the lack of ethics and morality in the beliefs, the concepts and the examples they think their role models have set that they carry around. They think they not only are upon "THE" something but have been so for the past 1400 years and they are now the Alims and everybody else is the Talib. When somebody raises questions, nobody bothers to provide answers because in this type of world view answers have already been provided the past 1400 years. Ironically while sitting in the bosom of the" Kuffar", no longer able to live in their own ancestral lands somehow but they are upon the answers nonetheless. Since answers have already been provided, the more generous of them will provide yet again these "answers". So for Bukhari it is a circular argument of somebody important confirmed by somebody else important who says manuscript A is this or that and so another important person then quotes it and on and on and round and round it goes. The fact that Mufti Goku has pointed out that there may be some issue in the very claim that these transmissions are intact in terms of original manuscripts and the multiple copies of said "original" manuscripts all differing and so on goes unnoticed by these paragons of morality and ehtics. Instead, if the questions are insisted upon or if somebody like Mufti Sherminator dares to give credence to anything remotely similar to doubt about some of the ethics and morality of whatever it is these people think they have been upon for the past 1400 years well. We can see what happens here in this thread. Not a single one of them has even attempted to discuss the actual topics or address any of the questions provided. Or addressed corollary questions such as why has no Muslim scholar condemned slavery in any form, historically? If they are such "dons" of morality and ethics, that is. They could rule on whether touching a dog is or is not pure and write about in book after book, debating it but buying, selling and through either war or raids or just simply purchasing from other nations slaves, that just continued without any brows being furrowed. Or why do they today not condemn or problematise the use of oil and naphta given how we now see that it affects the balance (mizaan) of the Earth and as the Khilafa of Man stipulates, we must not transgress the Mizaan? Perhaps as in the past, the black gold that washed the feet of the Arabs or the Turks, today as the new black gold that is under their feet lines their pockets they suffer the same moral and ethical blindness? Sumun, bukmun, umyoun? Or any number of other issues that can be raised that clearly beg the question of whether or not there may actually be some real issue with the fundamental moral and ethical outlook of your average Muslim if he or she takes on the beliefs, the concepts and the examples they think their role models have set for them. Instead we get personal attacks, condemnation and even personal threats! The threats I take for real because too many Muslims have shown they, sadly, love death more than they love life. And then they wonder why it is so that no known famous scholar has ever differed in this way with mainstream understanding of the very roots of Islam as practiced daily by Muslims today that Mufti Abu Layth is doing?
@@seletarroots3258 thank you. You have summarized a great subject in a beautiful way. I really respect you for taking the time to do this. This is my islam. Taking your time to share your views with valuable arguments that are not only intended to insult others. You can make a difference. We can make a difference. Although we get ridiculed by the mass, that should be taken as a compliment. I wish you well and hope you never encounter with the reality of such threats u speak of. I hope people learn to read. Learn to understand. Have faith and not only religion.
Thank you for reading. And thank you for considering my words. In the end we are all in this together, including the Wahabis/Salafis. Somehow we must find a way to respect their beliefs and understandings while prospering, flourish together and maintaining the ability to actively make choices.
Why are you guys obssessing with this Abu layth character ? He's nobody Wallahi I never heard of him until you guys started talking about him your just making him more popular and giving him a platform
Lines Lines Brothers there are many people whom want to reform Islam to fit their desires.. this Santa actually appeals to those people whom are from the same cultural Islamic background as he is. Santa tells them what they want to hear and thy are loving him for it.
I have stumbled on his video a couple of times, when ever I Google some Islamic questions. It's best that Muslims know that he cannot be trusted. Allah granted me hidaya that I just didn't trust his answers to the questions I had, not many Muslims can tell, and they might end up falling into the fitnah of life or shrik. May Allah hide us all.ameen
How is that destroying? You didn't actually address the points he gave? The only appropriate destroying is going point by point or flat out simply explaining where the mistake was. Just saying that's too dumb a question to answer then casting doubt on intentions works well with your audience who wants to believe you but doesn't convince at all someone trying to find the truth
"Mufti" is going after the hadeeth books exactly like the shias, apparently he is not a shia but probably a hadeeth rejecter. People know hadeeth explains the Quran and if you discredit the ahadeeth, it will be easy to (mis)interpret Quran. This can be seen in the case of Christians who don't have the sunnah and the ahadeeth of Jesus thus end up interpreting bible as they like. Probably there may be 7 or 8 ahadeeth that are not that strong in bukhari(per Albani) but Mr.Mufti you do not throw out the baby with the water. May Allah save us and the flock from the disguised wolves.
of course when there are hadith’s like ‘kill the apostate’ that Sunni’s defend, someone that reads and studies the Quran is going to discredit it straight away. You know why? because it ain’t compatible with the Quran when Allah says ‘No compulsion in Deen’. If people are are taught to read to recite the Quran in Arabic for rewards, you have masses of people reading Arabic, don’t know the meaning of the words, therefore rely upon scholars, imaams and molvi’s for there understanding which ain’t always right cos there humans not holy. People are left open to being sold religion in a form of religious dogma. hadiths that are incompatible with Quran are kept in the books as Sahih ? Why ? To understand what? There are thousands of hadeeth and many made up.
@@yummiyahyaa that was why there's a knowledge called uloom ul Hadith. To study the authenticity of the Hadith itself. And the scholar that really taught well about the deen study the Aqidah for 20 years so, the possibility of them to lie it's minimum and if they made mistakes it's still make sense because, they're a human being that learn from experience.
Harry Rasheed if bukhari is all wrong then where are you getting your sunnah? This is stupidity, you check the hadeeth and his narration and you know if it is saheeh or hasen or weak. It does not have to be with names just to look at the narrations
@@kaba2000 oh Allah my Lord , I do love the sunnah where Prophet spit in a face of a child , or that time when he said head of satan is in te house of Aishah R.a
The fact that a book s.Bukhari compiled by a man who was 100s of years away and thousands of miles away from The Hijaz todays occupied s.Arabia) is taken to be so perfect is in it self a contradiction ! And people accept it on face value to be so genuine means it is not. There is only 1 perfect book The book of Allah.
Imam Bukhari rahimahullah collected them from whom? From tabayes, so apparently they were in circulation amongst muslims before he collected them. There were collections by the tabaye and we even have some if not all of them today. Probably this clown got revelation(from Iblis) saying the ahadeeth are bs!
Hate to say, but it's true. SAHIH bhukari has been censored by the Ummayads, and they decided what can and what cannot be placed in it. First example: about Lady Aisha being 6 and 9 yr. Old when wedded to RasulAllah. * that's a lie. She was not a prebubescent child, but it was written that way for whatever reason they thought important to enficize her virginity.. she actually was around 18. Yr. Old. That's just One. Example.
Allah/God, the Creator of everything, has always sent Prophets with one message: Worshipp the One God ! (Qur'an, surah Anbiya, ayat 25) The Arabs, the world at all, was in deep chaos in the 7th century, and then God sent his final messenger Muhammad s.a.w.s., who in 23 years turned a whole people to pure monotheists, and spread it from the East to the West, a religion, which is growing faster and faster till this day. But the shia claim, that Muhammad s.a.v.s. was sent for one purpose: to say how his cousin is an allmighty supernatural demigod, whom you should invoke and waste money on tombs Please shias, finally convert to Islam.
Bismillahir RAhmanir Rahim (1st word of Quran) word alone proves trinity wrong, they say Allah is Ar Rahman or Merciful in this world but not Ar Rahim Merciful in the next world w/o a sacrifice, may Allah guide nasara back to din of Jesus, Islam which even bible says will he'll leave israelites for the light of nations per isiah 49 & isiah 42, Returning as a Muslim, showing Muhammad peace and blessings on him is the comfortor to correct the errors of paul in particular (false lawless Prophet of mathew 24:11 and saw devil in acts 9,3 matching luke 10 :18) per john 16 :8 considering so called holy spirit is angel Jibril who visits Mary. after the forged prolouge He is the prophet to come per beginning of john after the Messiah! Jesus vs paul on forgiveness of Allah preferring Mercy and the law while paul oppose both basic Prophetic structures for secularist tyranny, or old testament description of God vs paul which even Quran corrects both. Example Allah did not get tired after 6 days or surah Iklas Kul hu Allahu Ahad, Allahus Samad (christians even contradict their own bible in saying another god won't be formed) Lem ya leed wa lem yu lad ( He begets not nor is begotten - reminds me of bible he is not a man or a son of Man) Wa lemya Kullahu Kufuwan Ahad (there is nothing like Him Allah)! This is why studying the Tawhid is so important and so unbeatable & priceless! Alhamdulilah for blessings of Islam and Sunnah!
Not an impressive defense after all. If you have something useful to say then please take Muft's points on Bokhari & clarify those. Mufti is sunni himself, I wonder which sunnah are you defending by criticising him half-heartedly.
Asalam alaykum wa rehmatullahi wa barakat brother Farid. I ask Allah to bless you, preserve you always Ameen. Also, I love your videos and the work that you are doing to aid the religion of Allah the most high, and I pray that Allah crosses our path one day, masalam.
Mufti Abu Laith is not rejecter of Bukhari. He is just pointing out that it is not 100% Sahih. Akram Nadwi's writing has no relevance to what Mufti is saying.
@@AhmedBAY , Here I agree with you to some extent. We need not agree or follow the Mufti on every issue of halal or haram. There are ample of opinions of different Imams and scholars on these matters to pick from. At the end of the day one should use own rational judgement and pick the best one.
Ahadeeth were still around and known by the sahaba and tabaees which were eventually collected by the great Imam Bukhari Rahimahullah. Sahi Bukhari is one of the foundations of our religious knowledge and it's understandable why people are going after it , if you know what I mean.
@@khanofcaledonia6413 bukhari is bullshit like all hadith books written by persian Zoroastrians. Remember it was umar and his followers who defeated the persians in many key battles they suffered heavy casualties and never forgot this. So it was a deliberate ploy a cunning one at that and carefully planned strategy to undermine the arabs and the quran. They never forget this and there great grand parents whom they lost in a humiliating manner. To summarise the hadith books were carefully planted. The seerah or biography of muhammad doesn't fair much better either it was written some 200 years later it's all rumours hearsay and Chinese whispers. Peace
@@khanofcaledonia6413 No its not. The base of our religious knowledge is Quran and Sunnah and they were both relayed down to us by tawatur. Stop treating bukhari sharif like Quran.
@@mohammedjamil2277 All Ahadeeth books were written by zorastians? None of the authors of 6 authentic hadeeth books were persians. There's enough research done on ahadeeth, daif and maudu ahadeeth are known. It doesn't make much sense to reject them, The shariah and fiqh heavily make use of them. So, no matter how much you oppose it you are following it day and night. All the mainstream scholars never reject them and we don't care about the fringe elements like mutazila.
@@anontoure7786 Apparently you are treating Sunnah like Quran. 😀 Just because there are some maudu and daif (week) ahadeeth, you don't throw the baby with the bath water. Ulema have done enough research and we know which ones are hasan and sahi (Authentic). Our thinkers and revivalists have refuted the allegations of the munkir alhadeeth folks on hadeeth by hadeeth basis. No body is treating hadeeth like Quran however you are bound to start interpretting Quran liberally without the hadeeth and sunnah which all the munkir ul ahadeeth people do including AbulLaith and Ghulam Parvez. That's a clear path of deviation. My cousin is on that path and has lost his faith. Aparrently some people are hungry for attention and they know becoming a mainstream scholar is not going to bring them recognition overnight unless you are Omer Sulaiman or Yaser Qadi so the path of controversies is a quick one to fame and that's what hero AbulLaith is on along with his gang. Pied Piper of Hamelin will lure some people to the river anyways. May Allah save us from these fitn/tribulations of misguidance.
AsSalaamu alaikum why haven't you responded to his challenge in his last video and the guy even brought imams who talked against al a'mash and can you prove that those scholars never talked against al a'mash
Finally, I was wondering why no one called that hypocrite out, he is very dangerous as his words carry weight because of his scholar status, I personally think the reason for his corruption is a direct result of him going to prison, is he angry because he was not protected by his status? Did he expect a miracle? I don't know, but he alone is responsible for his downfall, he cannot blame anyone but himself,
Furthermore, times are very difficult with all the islamophobia throughout the world, it's hard to defend Islam and hypocrites like the one mentioned only makes matters worse,
1. If it goes against reason or common sense 2. If it contradicts established sources. Qur'an and well established sunna.... And 3. ???... This dude quickly shut it down before he got to 3 saying "that's enough of that"... No it WASN'T enough. Let him state the third reason. You played that much. Why not play it all? Looks suspicious.
Anyone with even little Islamic knowledge will know how wrong this so called mufti Abu layth. He’s soooooo wrong in so many ways. Ya Allah save us from such munafiqs Ameen
According to other ulamas even Akram nadawi is a deviant. You’re all just a part of this new toxic trend of refuting one another all while using the same antics as the person you’re criticizing. Extremely inmature … you guys are acting worse than the kardashians at least they’re entertaining compared to this clown show.
Who is this guy Abu Lahab? His talks reminds of the aayah in the Quran where Allah ordained us to follow His chosen Deen (Islam) in its entirety and not to become a hypocrite by accepting some of it as well as rejecting the rest of the scriptures.
These guys are the same guys (Wahabhi defense) who are also casual and happy about the fact that the hadith also state that the Prophet was impotent.....I mean what nonsense is this...
Merciful Rahman and? If the prophet pbuh was impotent and it was narrated by reliable narrators how does that negate his prophet hood? Christians and Jews deem the prophet of Allah swt to be adulterers, mass murderers, liars etc but yet if our prophet pbuh became sick due to a poison that killed. Sahabi immediately after eating it his impotency negates his prophethood somehow? Stop quoting abu layth and get some actual knowledge.
Assalam Alaykum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuh. The fans/Followers of Abu Layth are becoming upset. Keep that in mind. Lol is this religion about the feelings of people or showing the Truth that's beneficial to humanity (Ummah)
I'm following this debate on both ends pretty fairly and in my fair opinion I think abu layth has raised more detailed and well constructed responses than you while citing sources. He responds directly to your claims of things which you accused of him saying which he never said in the first place. You seem to be quoting mufti abu layth out of context over and over from the 1st or 2nd video and on. I noticed this when you were talking about Suleman. (Which he also responded to). You claimed he didnt know the people in the chain of hadith that he was quoting. Which was again out of context. Youre the one who first released a video against mufti abu layth becsuse he has a problem with this hadith of martial rape or hadiths like aisha being married at the age of 9. And now you're saying you never said any of this stuff. Well why did you even make a video then in the first place? Dont Lie or backtrack now. You even misquoted him in this video when you said towards the beginning of the video that he does not think sahih al bukhari is a reliable book. Thats another lie. He is not rejecting the book as a whole but pointing out the problems with the book because other people think it's a perfect flawless book. He quotes hadiths from shahi al bukhari all the time. Although you raised fair points at times It seems you're more into debating and winning rather than having an honest debate. The nature of this channel is about debating and going back and forth and embarrassing people. And you seem to be too focused on that rather than making and focusing on the subject at hand. It's getting to your head. In this video it seemed like you blatantly ignored his challenge which he presented to you. Which was to bring one hadith (which is all mufti abu layth asked for) which cant be criticized from its chain. Or something along that. You had about 2 weeks to do this. Yet you waited until this article dropped and now you seem to be hiding behind this article. In fact you didnt even mention that challenge in this video. You clearly had time to release other videos in the past 2 weeks and even go live on TH-cam. Yet you didnt rise to his challenge or respond until this article came out. Why is that? If he is so wrong should you not just cite your sources and read directly from whichever book you wish to like he does at times? I'm all for a good open discussion but I'm not a fan boy like most people who easily support you or mufti abu layth like a political party. Stop lying/misquoting and just cite your logic and source. You missed nearly all of his critical points from his last response.
Faraz Khurshid You appear to lack basic knowledge that's why you can't decipher right from wrong. Do you actually check his sources?? Each and everyone of them... I don't give this Dajjal the time of day he appeals to those who follow their desires Islam doesn't suit your desires you have to change yourself to fit Islam Not the other way around. It's not about if it doesn't make sense to you... who are we to make these judgments?? Most people are brainWashed by society and want Islam to fit with their logic. Common that is not how Islam works. Regarding his challenge... the only people who care about it is you guys for everyone else,it's sufficient that he just rejects Hadith based on his desires. Here he has clearly been caught misinterpreting what his guy said, just so he can fool people into sharing his understanding. Most are not fooled many knowledgeable people have refuted him. The only people who follow him are those who lack knowledge and thefore believe anything they are told purely because it "makes sense" to there brainWashed minds, your taking your deen from a dajjal may Allah guide you.
Aa1izer A See this is how i know you dont understand the situation. Mufti abu layth argument is actually based on the LACK of evidence for the chain of sahih al bukhari to us. "I dont give this dajjal the time of my day..." well why are you commenting then buddy? Lol you clearly admitted to not listening to his position and blindly following sunni defense. You're the exact type of FAN BOY I was reffering to in my comment. You assume sunni defense is right while admitting you dont even list to your oppositions argument. This is the exact problem with many religious people across all religions. Dont get involved in this if you dont plan on using your head with fair judgement. Be part of the solution not the problem my friend. And might I add about the source....let's assume for a second 100% of mufti abu layths sources were false....the ideas is that AT LEAST he is quoting something. I'm highly curious as to what Sunni Defense's real argument even is now. Because in this video he said that he never said anything about accepting or rejecting the hadith on martial rape or anything about abu layth....which is again not true. Sunni defense came at mufti abu layth for criticizing a hadith originally and now hes back tracking. If he never had an issue in the first place why make the original video and start all this? And all of it WITHOUT SOURCES. Mufti abu layth reads directly from a book at times and even gives the name of the book and author. It's easy to assume without evidence that he is lying on purpose....or you're in denial. If you're saying hes lying and hes quoting previous scholars then you're essentially saying they're all wrong too including people like Imam Malik. As for the challenge...sunni defense had 2 weeks to say something...they were and still are silent on that challenge. I dont think you realize something. If Sunni defense say that challenge is impossible to meet, then they're in agreement with mufti abu layth. If not then that means they should make a video with their argument, reasoning, and sources and end the debate right then and there. If mufti abu layth is so wrong why is this so hard to do? Why cant sunni defense say "listen guy here are the reasons abu layth is wrong." Why hide behind the article of another sheikh? This sitiuation is bringing out the ugly side of Sunni defense. you're throwing out vague terms that even you cant define. "People of knowledge." Abu layth is a strict follower of imamMalik. Is imam Malik not a person of knowledge now? Mufti abu layth quotes sahih al bukhari at times. is sahih al bukhari not a person of knowledge now? Choose your words carefully, you're refuting your own argument. You have 0 proof he rejects certain hadiths based on his personal desires. Other scholars including sahih al bukhari rejected hadiths. Imam Malik and the other 3 imams rejected each others hadiths. Are they all people of personal desires too? Stop being a fan boy, use your head.
Wenutz he barely addressed the side points lol he even misquoted mufti abu layth on the side arguments. Honestly I dont even know what their motive or argument is at this point. They seem to be jumping all over the place and have been silent since mufti abu layths last detailed video in which he posed the challenged. I thought sunni defense made sound and decent claims in video #2 I think it was. Since then the mufti has responded to alot of important points raised up by sunni defense. However the vise versa is non existence. If this sitiuation is doing anything its exposing sunni defense hunger to win an argument like a child rather than discuss topics properly. This is the same type of situation mufti abu layth ran into with another shiekh. He wanted such a formal debate and whatnot instead of just discussing points back and forth.
He cherry picks the points from article and portrays in such a way in which he can shame abu layth.. You are doing nothing than shaming abu layth. He atleast comes up with some detailed arguements, unlike you obviously.
Layth is obviously knowledgeable but he cuts & pastes too much and his hypocrisy has been found out, he has links to the Shia's to Qulliam, I believe he has sold his religion for this life, I hope Allah swt puts him back on the right path, even majority Sunni Sufis reject him & have labelled him as a complete stupid idiot.
Shaikh Akram is staying true to the deen. I wouldn't describe it as 'throwing so-and-so under the bus'. A Muslim's obligation is to Allah and His Messenger (s) and thus to the truth. It is more apt to say that Abu Layth has possibly been lying about Shaikh Nadwi.
Most of guys who talked about Abu layth I would say has not really listened to him but have just heard what he is saying cause to truly listen to someone, it should not be based on your prejudices against that person but majority are listening to him with their prejudices since he is bringing out lot of falsehood out of these hadith's .in my opinion and for anyone who is truly honest to find the truth will find majority of what he is saying makes sense , because every common sensecale Muslim knows that all those so called sahih book are full of nonsense Hadith that degrade the prophet and Islam . Not that I care about abou layth or any of these so called scholars who claim to be on the right . One thing I respect about Abu layth is that he is not calling you into a sexy or to follow him but he is just sharing his knowledge of the Hadith in addition he is having his opinion so that anyone who disagree with him can challenge him
May Allah protect us all from this guy
@@mazuzu3451 If the atheists would look at real science and not lie like they do with evolution as mutations cause cancer not "evolving" as Dna and Rna are written like co-op languages, or lie like they do with monsanto or saying cigarettes are healthy, and saw it as a whole same way if previous scriptures looked at their scriptures wit honesty they would be Muslims.
Islam is simple and for anyone and a Mercy but it has a strong foundation and can build! like Humans are made from dirt humble and low but things grow from ti while fire stands tall but burns down! There are all the proofs in the world but we need to be humble. May Allah make it easy for us. Amin!
I advice you to stop being a weak racist self humiliating devil worshipper who in your hate admits you are inferior and we are superior with your jelous hatred... just become a decent human being!
@@mazuzu3451 so humanity is a joke to you atheists, you defeat yourself as your purpose is to worship Allah alone! atheists built no civilization and all Prophets peace and blessings be upon them's message changed but point to Islam the preserved faith, humanity as a whole tesitifes Islam is true, this mean Allah is Just, Most Merciful, All Wise, present in the Sending of Prophets and signs of the last day. this is just history signs of the last day are coming true, so time itself testifies Islam is true.
Whats bigger is the universe, Earth has 7 layers and Quran says EArth made 2 days and Heavens in 6. modern science is humbled by Quran as Earth is 1/3 age of universe as science shows. Islam puts science to the test and it was a Muslim who made the modern science method.
Allah says He creates in pairs, and dna and rna are written like co-op languages one can't survive without the other and took millions of years to form meaning they were made at the same time. While mutations in science don't cause speciation but cancer, the moment from non life to life is a miracle but atheists attribute it to death, talk about contradiction, while Islam knows the answer intel design, Allah is all Wise Creator and Merciful.
Islam has 5 pillars to built a community, 6 pillars of faith and 5 pillars of preservation in society, faith - as stated earlier atheists built no civilizations , 2 health Islamic hygeine taught europe ghusul preventing plagues, and now with c. virus its said to come from bats and swine eaten in marxist china who oppose Islam which forbids it, if they would of embraced Islam instead of fighting it maybe the world would be safer 3, mind Islam is preserved by Allah as our basis for humanity and we seek knowledge as stated a Muslim made the modern science method, 4 Family - the same science shows ppl aren't born astray like the marxist science liars show, but the nuclear family is best and we teach marraige and honor 5. Money - we reject sinful money like usury making rich richer or stock gambling stealing others wealth or selling drugs pornography hurting the other categories as Islam is a balance- againt the atheist lawless vulnerabilities and judeo marxist tyranny which paul turned christianity to eventually and now sweeps through china, Islam is the middle path between 2 mountains or to say the valley path! as Malik Shabazz Aka Malcolm X said Oneness of Lord will = ONeness of Man Insha Allah but we start with Tawhid, pillars and Manhaj Sunnah wa salaf!
So Humanity, biology, civilization, past, future, time & space all testify to Allah so you are only a joke in reality of reality, but you can return as Allah is Most Merciful! Bismilliahir Rahmanir Rahim - With the name of Allah begin in Allah's Name the Most Merciful bestower of that Mercy! Hadith All children of Adam sin but the best of those who sin are those who repent!
Ma Zuzu why so racist
Gay?
is it just me or this guy sounds more and more like a hadith rejector? So now he believes sahih bukhari is alledgedly compiled by imam bukhari eh?
I think your right there akhi
The only way to know what claim he's making is to watch his video. Shocking I know
@*Floofy shibe* didnt you watch the video? On min 3:10 he said it is ALLEDGEDLY imam bukhari's book
All the counter videos against MALM are aimed towards his behavior and character instead of the substances of his argument. Counter his points not him for god’s sake.
"Mufti" is going after the hadeeth exactly like the shias, apparently he is not shia but hadeeth rejecter. People know hadeeth is the explanation of the Quran and if you discredit the hadeeth, it will be easy to (mis)interpret Quran as you like. This can be seen in the case of Christians who don't have the sunnah and the ahadeeth of Jesus thus end up interpreting bible as they like.
Hadeeth is not explanation of Quran. This is the biggest misinformation. Hadith is only “heard knowledge” which the prophet gave in form of advise to certain people. It was never meant for mass transmission. Only Quran and Sunnah is mass transmitted. Hadith is not Sunnah.
@@SamyAlingo1993 hadith is sunnah idiot
@@hmmm3210 yeah right, "khabar ul ahad" is sunnah, just listen to yourself you moronic blockhead!!!
What is his name, Sorry I didn't get that Abu laheb???😂
😂
May the one and only reward you.
I am currently debating him right now on his lecture about Osiris being Usair in the Qur'an. His lecture is being adopted by other scholars and word-for-word retaught on their channels, as well as being shared through popular channels such as The Believer. Hopefully he will perticipate fully in the debate and the results of our discussions can be made available to the Ummah for everyone benefit from.
I am a revert to Islam, alhumdulilah. I was raised in a non-religious household with the freedom to choose my own faith. I was fascinated with the imagery of ancient Egypt when I was four years and was fond of studying their culture and religion as a hobby. The first religion I committed myself to was Wicca, where I partook in witchcraft and worshipped gods (including Egyptian) from different cultures. Thus I have studied nearly every prominent pagan religion to some degree, as well as LeVeyan Satanism and Baphmet Satanism. I also have some knowledge in early church history and the comparison of modern Bibles to thr Codez Sanaticus. This started at the age of 12, and I was studying to become a High Priestess of magic. At the age of 20 I began to shift my belief system to Kemeticism (Ancient Egyptian religion), where I left witchcraft and the other deities and dedicated myself solely to the Egyptian religion. I joined a Temple and began my studies in the hopes of being a priestess of goddess Het-Heru (Hathor).
The woman which I studied under has a PhD in Ancient Egyptian studies and focuses on translation of Heirolgyphics and Coptic texts, as well as religion. She has been on some of History Channel's documentaries regarding Egyptian religion. She established the Temple that I studied at in the 80's after she, too, left Wicca just before becoming a High Priestess. Her legal name is Tamara L. Suida, however the Temple regards her as a legitimate Pharaoh. I also, informally, studied from resources outside the Temple to gain a broader knowledge. I was planning on pursuing Egyptology after I had finished my military career, of which my job was Chinese intel translation. (May Allah SWT forgive me for the three months I was in the military while being a Muslim, supporting the terrorist kuffar and being unable to wear hijab on uniform).
I would like to state that although I don't have a Mufti-equivalent level of knowledge pertaining to the Egyptian religion, I do regard myself as decently studied. Being highly educated in Egyptian religion is difficult as there is a great deal of flexibility within the faith and many truths that co-existed but also contradicted at that time (such as more than one creation story). If there are any flaws in my debate I am open to discuss these flaws, but I tried to extensively fact check everything through multiple sources before stating the information.
I am now planning on picking up my studies in magic and ancient egyptian religion, as well as paganism in general. I am also planning on starting shari'a school. I want to be a Sheikha who is able to help the pagans, and also educate the Ummah on the truths of magic and paganism from my own experiences.
May Allah SWT guide me and keep my heart clean of pride, kufr, and shirk during my vocational journey.
Jazakhallah Kheir
May Allah keep you steadfast till the day you meet him. You have a good intention, but I would advise not to waste your time in debating that particuar matter with him for two reasons. 1- This man has more serious issues that if he understood what he is saying, scholars would have made Takfeer/Tab'dee of him. 2-You are a beginner student. Do not open that discussion with someone like him. He will divert you and put a lot of doubts in your religion.
Learn your religion properly from reliable sources and leave that sourcery related knowlege even if you think theres benefit. This is my advice, you can take it or leave it. Barakallahu feek
@@MadeEasySeries
I understand he has more knowledge when it comes to the Qur'an and Islam than myself, however for that particular topic knowledge of Islam isn't really needed. If you watch the video you would understand.
I feel it is a duty of every Muslim to speak out against fitnah.
It is alright, after sending only one response he has yet to read anything I have sent him for days. So, I don't think this will go anywhere. I just hope my comment gets read on all postings I found of the video, and the Ummah protect themselves on this one. It is all that can be done for now.
I just want to learn some basic Arabic so I can get accepted into the Shari'a school in my area.
@@MadeEasySeries In addition, I have seen a compilation of all the thibgs he says which contradicts the deen. However with this topic there are a plethora of scholars, Sheikh, and average people like ourselves that can easily identify and ignore his obvious lies. However on the topic I am debating him on not even the scholars have the information that I have to refute. On that video people are showing support and agreement in the idea because they simply don't know any better and he makes everything on the explination sound logical.
Scholars and Sheikh lack experience in this area. That is where I can give them resources and information to help them, until I become a Sheikha myself. However I have contacted all four Sheikh and scholars who own The Believer channel, and messaged the the channel's email, Instagram, and Facebook. No response was given from either of them. So if they will not do their duty to remove the video after being shown clear evidence then I have to do my part.
Otherwise I am not doing as Allah commanded, which is to forbid evil. I will not stop until the video is removed.
@@asiyaheibhlin May Allah help you sister.
@@Mayranos Ameen. May Allah guide me in a way that benefits the Ummah.
This guy has no shame
sajid mahmood neither does your mum
Seriously....? Only personal attacks on Abu Layth? No substantive response? No response on the legitimate question regarding the source of the Bukhari book?
They’ll never actually address or answer the concerns mufti abu layth raises because they know he’s right, so instead the personal attacks come.
Akram. With all due respect, you are saying that this guy is "strawmanning" but you misquoted this guy as well. Was that intentional? Yes, i have been following both of yours banter both ways, but what Abu Layth says is "Dont say Bukhari is the most authentic and keep it in par or above the Quran in authenticity". He says that many many times. So brother, you misquoted him absolutely.
Which part?
I don't think that it's worth listening to this Abu layth(clown) who say Easa ibn Maryam will not come again. This liar is denying Quran in many of his videos just to prove his point of view. All he wants to belittle Sahi bukhari by comparing with Holy book at the same time denying its Ayats.
Quoting or misquoting him doesn't make any difference.
@@syedhussain2656 So you are just denying what he says without reasoning? What are your thesis's to do that? If he is wrong, prove it by an explanation with evidence, not just insults and rhetoric.
@@shohorabahamed3753 Sahih Bukhari is not kept on par with the Qur'an - Abu Layth has said many questionable things - he looks for ikhtilaaf and pounces on it then presents it to people who know no better if it accords with his desire, he also places reason above revelation in denying the explicit wording of the Qur'an about miracles and magic. Whatever his intentions, he is in the wrong.
@@husnainkhalil2554 You are right. Sahih Buhari is not kept in par with the Quran. But brother, it is elevated more than the Quran. It is a fact that a lot of Muslims throw the Quran away and claim some verses are abrogated and some of ther verses are neglected but the Sahih Buhari is all adopted in theory. This is a fact. My parents did it, my madrasa did it, my jamaat movement did it, all my life they threw the Quran over the thames and held on to the ahadith.
Its fact.
Such a weak point against Abu Layth! You haven’t addressed the dodgy Hadiths which attribute absurdities to the prophet (pbuh) - which is Abu Layth’s main point. What you guys don’t seem to realize that whilst Abu Layth is fighting for the honor of the prophet (by audaciously challenging Hadiths that lowkey disrespect and insult the prophet), you guys are simply fighting for the status quo to be maintained.
Fine
Let's give this to him
What about his other stupid claims?
He literally declared everything halal.
Ahmed BA He’s a bonafide qualified mufti with Ijaza in these things and he’s also a hafiz of the noble Quran (mashaAllah may Allah preserve and protect him). I doubt if he has declared everything halal like you said. I don’t remember him declaring rape or murder halal for example.
@@76454455555071 hold on
I'll show what is Islam according to him,
He's issues fatwas again Qur'an and sunnah
@AkhiSalafiyyah who else but yourself is the shaytan? lol funny how you ignorant lot always have a self-righteous mentality. Abu Layth is a Hafiz and I can bet a substantial amount you ain’t! Yet, u come here yapping with ignorance. May God help you lot.
Even I was influenced by this Mufti Abu Clown.
Sunni 4 life Abu layth once stated that jannah and jahannam are metaphorical not literal.
Sunni 4 life
Alhanduallah Allah guided you. Be great full brother these Dajjal type characters are everywhere. Be careful where you take your knowledge. "Knowledge is deen so be careful who you take your knowledge from"
akib if we start listing his heretical beliefs we will be here for days
Sunni 4 life how have you determined that Mufti Abu Layth comments make him a clown?
Merciful Rahman what brother said was kind of husn al-Dhan, otherwise Abu layth should be addressed as a heretical liar.
We will see more liars like Abu Layth soon. They are the product of this age. But Allah is all seeing. Allah will bring all such people to end. It's just a matter of time.
Yo farid why don't you debate abu layth?
You can't debate with a fool.
Farid invited him to debate, Layth accepted but then backed down, because Farid wanted a neutral moderator to coordinate the debate and not a student of layth.
Ha, it's December 2020 and Mufti Abu Layth is more popular than ever. Fact is there are many more Muslims like myself who share his views. He always provides proof for his stances and always has an open invitation for anyone who disagrees with him and woukd like to have a civil discourse on the subject. What he never does as some of you do, is call those who do not share the same view/opinions derogatory names. Mufti Abu Layth is a breath of fresh air. Thank Allah swt for him.
Excuse me? Are you being serious? This heretic you call "Mufti" literally has a reputation for mocking people.
@@SunnahDiscourse i think i would have committed suicide if it wasn't haram after reading his comment
The sarcastic Masha’Allah killed me 😂😂
i dont know these 2 people but bukhari has weak hadiths even shiekh albani and ibn hajar and others have pointed to this and many others have done jarh on saheeh hadith books and imam abu hanifa only accepted mutawatir hadith because he was concerned about fake hadiths but nowadays people who call themselves hanafis mostly use daeef hadeeths wa a change to the madhab
Didn’t Ibn Hajar defend Bukhari from criticism?
Al albani (la) said that Aisha ra could've commited zina and he has weakened many sahih hadiths.
And about the criticism about hanafis, keep it to yourself. You're a joke.
I'm not a hadith rejector btw. This is a comment about Al albani and hanafis.
@@jeevacation where have you heard that Albani said Ayesha could have committed zina?
This was a weak video. People talk about his behaviour and im just waiting for proof. YOU dont need to defend Imam Boekharie, only show proof that all the ahadith in Sahih Boekharie are claimed Sahih by Boekharie himself. So this doesnt show in any way that abu layth's challenge has been met. Not in any way. You are just shaming him for being excentric. But for God sake we know already. Now we want to see proof.
M3a Salama
That would require actual work, knowledge and the sincerity and honesty that it would demand following it´s completion or once conclusions have been reached. A simple HDI analysis with a short look at the assessment made by the World Bank will indicate that people from that part of the world, at least in their nations of origin, are not defined by high productivity, conscientious hard work and intellectual excellence. That is for all to see and is not my personal opinion.
The issue with Bukhari is just a symptom. The deeper lying problem is that too many Muslims today simply do not have sufficient insight into the lack of ethics and morality in the beliefs, the concepts and the examples they think their role models have set that they carry around. They think they not only are upon "THE" something but have been so for the past 1400 years and they are now the Alims and everybody else is the Talib. When somebody raises questions, nobody bothers to provide answers because in this type of world view answers have already been provided the past 1400 years. Ironically while sitting in the bosom of the" Kuffar", no longer able to live in their own ancestral lands somehow but they are upon the answers nonetheless. Since answers have already been provided, the more generous of them will provide yet again these "answers". So for Bukhari it is a circular argument of somebody important confirmed by somebody else important who says manuscript A is this or that and so another important person then quotes it and on and on and round and round it goes. The fact that Mufti Goku has pointed out that there may be some issue in the very claim that these transmissions are intact in terms of original manuscripts and the multiple copies of said "original" manuscripts all differing and so on goes unnoticed by these paragons of morality and ehtics. Instead, if the questions are insisted upon or if somebody like Mufti Sherminator dares to give credence to anything remotely similar to doubt about some of the ethics and morality of whatever it is these people think they have been upon for the past 1400 years well. We can see what happens here in this thread. Not a single one of them has even attempted to discuss the actual topics or address any of the questions provided. Or addressed corollary questions such as why has no Muslim scholar condemned slavery in any form, historically? If they are such "dons" of morality and ethics, that is. They could rule on whether touching a dog is or is not pure and write about in book after book, debating it but buying, selling and through either war or raids or just simply purchasing from other nations slaves, that just continued without any brows being furrowed. Or why do they today not condemn or problematise the use of oil and naphta given how we now see that it affects the balance (mizaan) of the Earth and as the Khilafa of Man stipulates, we must not transgress the Mizaan? Perhaps as in the past, the black gold that washed the feet of the Arabs or the Turks, today as the new black gold that is under their feet lines their pockets they suffer the same moral and ethical blindness? Sumun, bukmun, umyoun? Or any number of other issues that can be raised that clearly beg the question of whether or not there may actually be some real issue with the fundamental moral and ethical outlook of your average Muslim if he or she takes on the beliefs, the concepts and the examples they think their role models have set for them.
Instead we get personal attacks, condemnation and even personal threats! The threats I take for real because too many Muslims have shown they, sadly, love death more than they love life. And then they wonder why it is so that no known famous scholar has ever differed in this way with mainstream understanding of the very roots of Islam as practiced daily by Muslims today that Mufti Abu Layth is doing?
@@seletarroots3258 thank you. You have summarized a great subject in a beautiful way. I really respect you for taking the time to do this. This is my islam. Taking your time to share your views with valuable arguments that are not only intended to insult others. You can make a difference. We can make a difference. Although we get ridiculed by the mass, that should be taken as a compliment. I wish you well and hope you never encounter with the reality of such threats u speak of. I hope people learn to read. Learn to understand. Have faith and not only religion.
Thank you for reading. And thank you for considering my words. In the end we are all in this together, including the Wahabis/Salafis. Somehow we must find a way to respect their beliefs and understandings while prospering, flourish together and maintaining the ability to actively make choices.
@@seletarroots3258 i agree with you both. it's important to present arguments rather than make personal attacks.
@@seletarroots3258 well said!
Why are you guys obssessing with this Abu layth character ? He's nobody Wallahi I never heard of him until you guys started talking about him your just making him more popular and giving him a platform
Lines Lines
Brothers there are many people whom want to reform Islam to fit their desires.. this Santa actually appeals to those people whom are from the same cultural Islamic background as he is. Santa tells them what they want to hear and thy are loving him for it.
It is better he is exposed so people do not fall into his devilish traps and makes people murtads
Me too! I never heard of this guy. I support The Sunni Defense, but if I were them, I would ignore him.
I have stumbled on his video a couple of times, when ever I Google some Islamic questions. It's best that Muslims know that he cannot be trusted. Allah granted me hidaya that I just didn't trust his answers to the questions I had, not many Muslims can tell, and they might end up falling into the fitnah of life or shrik. May Allah hide us all.ameen
How is that destroying? You didn't actually address the points he gave? The only appropriate destroying is going point by point or flat out simply explaining where the mistake was. Just saying that's too dumb a question to answer then casting doubt on intentions works well with your audience who wants to believe you but doesn't convince at all someone trying to find the truth
Wait doesn’t this guy say (ra) whenever he mentions A’isha (ra)?
Yes Yes! these deviants need to be exposed
Can y’all call him by his real name
Poor muftea
Abu Muhamed Alee Al Ansari Lol. 😂😂
Mufti said anal sex is halal lol
Layth is illuminati. Sold his soul.
Oh my we have an abu layb fan here
Layth*
Iee
He just sold his soul to Satan
It does not need any video
It is clear
@@darksoul4001
Do you have Satan number? I want to sell my soul too. How to contact Satan?
@@optimusprime5199 May Allah Azzawajal guide you
"Mufti" is going after the hadeeth books exactly like the shias, apparently he is not a shia but probably a hadeeth rejecter. People know hadeeth explains the Quran and if you discredit the ahadeeth, it will be easy to (mis)interpret Quran. This can be seen in the case of Christians who don't have the sunnah and the ahadeeth of Jesus thus end up interpreting bible as they like.
Probably there may be 7 or 8 ahadeeth that are not that strong in bukhari(per Albani) but Mr.Mufti you do not throw out the baby with the water.
May Allah save us and the flock from the disguised wolves.
of course when there are hadith’s like ‘kill the apostate’ that Sunni’s defend, someone that reads and studies the Quran is going to discredit it straight away. You know why? because it ain’t compatible with the Quran when Allah says ‘No compulsion in Deen’. If people are are taught to read to recite the Quran in Arabic for rewards, you have masses of people reading Arabic, don’t know the meaning of the words, therefore rely upon scholars, imaams and molvi’s for there understanding which ain’t always right cos there humans not holy. People are left open to being sold religion in a form of religious dogma. hadiths that are incompatible with Quran are kept in the books as Sahih ? Why ? To understand what? There are thousands of hadeeth and many made up.
@@yummiyahyaa that was why there's a knowledge called uloom ul Hadith. To study the authenticity of the Hadith itself.
And the scholar that really taught well about the deen study the Aqidah for 20 years so, the possibility of them to lie it's minimum and if they made mistakes it's still make sense because, they're a human being that learn from experience.
@@adamryamizard5560 what are you saying i think all of the hadiths in sahih bukhari are said authentic
@@myst1049 your thinking doesn't make it right.
@@adamryamizard5560 Are you going to follow hadith that contradicts quran if its in sahih bukhari
Brother you destroyed these quraaniy or rafidiy or what does he really is...
Harry Rasheed if bukhari is all wrong then where are you getting your sunnah? This is stupidity, you check the hadeeth and his narration and you know if it is saheeh or hasen or weak. It does not have to be with names just to look at the narrations
@@kaba2000 oh Allah my Lord , I do love the sunnah where Prophet spit in a face of a child , or that time when he said head of satan is in te house of Aishah R.a
The fact that a book s.Bukhari compiled by a man who was 100s of years away and thousands of miles away from The Hijaz todays occupied s.Arabia) is taken to be so perfect is in it self a contradiction !
And people accept it on face value to be so genuine means it is not.
There is only 1 perfect book The book of Allah.
Imam Bukhari rahimahullah collected them from whom? From tabayes, so apparently they were in circulation amongst muslims before he collected them. There were collections by the tabaye and we even have some if not all of them today.
Probably this clown got revelation(from Iblis) saying the ahadeeth are bs!
He is not worth listening to. Bukhai shareef is a shining beacon that cannot ne blocked from radiating light.
Subhan Allah, what is Abu Layth saying?! Jazak Allahu khayran for all of your videoes!
Bukari was a humen being he can do errors..and just because of not correcting bukari..non muslim think bad of our nabi
absolutely.
When you discuss islam or Allah with Shaytan. He will change your words so stay far away from these people.
Did he actually make a satanic sign when mentioning the 2😯
Yes of course
Same thing I noticed
abu layth accuses you guys of calling the prophet peace be upon him sexually impotent is this true?
Of course not!
How did Sahih Bukhari come to us? That is the question.
Why are you refuting Abu Layth's filthy claim with Deobandi Akram Nadwi instead of refuting him with the Salafee scholars?
Im confused do i trust abu layth?
How can he be a learned man drinking with his left hand.
The camera was in reverse. It was written in the paper behind him
If your that confident why not debate with him mr akram?
Gaaaguuu taaali
@@147111 gaanngguuuu teeelliiii
Why would he need to debate with someone that always said "I think" On something that serious?
Qadyani’s r not Muslims.
Hate to say, but it's true. SAHIH bhukari has been censored by the Ummayads, and they decided what can and what cannot be placed in it.
First example: about Lady Aisha being 6 and 9 yr. Old when wedded to RasulAllah. * that's a lie. She was not a prebubescent child, but it was written that way for whatever reason they thought important to enficize her virginity.. she actually was around 18. Yr. Old. That's just One. Example.
The thumb nail is hilarious Santa actually looks like he is crying
Aa1izer A more evidence for Santa than your Allah
Ma Zuzu how stupid are you???? Why are there stupid people in this world when this is supposedly such an advanced age
@@spice4777
Agree, stupid people still believe in flying horses. 🤦♀️
“..,.arite Arite we’re done here...”
So you think marital rape is ok?
Akram nadwi is also an innovators some of his fatawa are bizzar it will shock a person who knows Quran and hadith very well .
its not a direct face to face Dabate is it ?
there is a big diffrence
Allah/God, the Creator of everything, has always sent Prophets with one message: Worshipp the One God ! (Qur'an, surah Anbiya, ayat 25)
The Arabs, the world at all, was in deep chaos in the 7th century, and then God sent his final messenger Muhammad s.a.w.s., who in 23 years turned a whole people to pure monotheists, and spread it from the East to the West, a religion, which is growing faster and faster till this day.
But the shia claim, that Muhammad s.a.v.s. was sent for one purpose: to say how his cousin is an allmighty supernatural demigod, whom you should invoke and waste money on tombs
Please shias, finally convert to Islam.
Wats your proof for ur statement
This guy has nothing better to do? Why are you wasting your precious time on this earth making a video about this person?
1:40 I think he's trying to curse with devil symbols.
You just said what he wanted someone to say akhi
You are exactly on point. He is a satanist. He has sold his soul to the satan. He is an Illuminati Agenda.
Teddi786 OG numerology may Allah curse the polytheists
😏😏😏😏
Bismillahir RAhmanir Rahim (1st word of Quran) word alone proves trinity wrong, they say Allah is Ar Rahman or Merciful in this world but not Ar Rahim Merciful in the next world w/o a sacrifice, may Allah guide nasara back to din of Jesus, Islam which even bible says will he'll leave israelites for the light of nations per isiah 49 & isiah 42, Returning as a Muslim, showing Muhammad peace and blessings on him is the comfortor to correct the errors of paul in particular (false lawless Prophet of mathew 24:11 and saw devil in acts 9,3 matching luke 10 :18) per john 16 :8 considering so called holy spirit is angel Jibril who visits Mary. after the forged prolouge He is the prophet to come per beginning of john after the Messiah! Jesus vs paul on forgiveness of Allah preferring Mercy and the law while paul oppose both basic Prophetic structures for secularist tyranny, or old testament description of God vs paul which even Quran corrects both. Example Allah did not get tired after 6 days or surah Iklas Kul hu Allahu Ahad, Allahus Samad (christians even contradict their own bible in saying another god won't be formed) Lem ya leed wa lem yu lad ( He begets not nor is begotten - reminds me of bible he is not a man or a son of Man) Wa lemya Kullahu Kufuwan Ahad (there is nothing like Him Allah)!
This is why studying the Tawhid is so important and so unbeatable & priceless! Alhamdulilah for blessings of Islam and Sunnah!
Not an impressive defense after all. If you have something useful to say then please take Muft's points on Bokhari & clarify those. Mufti is sunni himself, I wonder which sunnah are you defending by criticising him half-heartedly.
This guy Farid. all he does is make videos about people but never dares to debate them.
Brother Farid looked so tired and malnourished back then. No offense, but he looks way cooler now
Why don’t you debate mufti layth?
"mufti" haggagagagagagaaggagaggagaagga
I waited the whole video where I can see you destroying Abu Lythe
Your being dishonest here. I disagree with layth position on Bukhari however I will not attribute false claims to him as you continue to do.
Asalam alaykum wa rehmatullahi wa barakat brother Farid. I ask Allah to bless you, preserve you always Ameen. Also, I love your videos and the work that you are doing to aid the religion of Allah the most high, and I pray that Allah crosses our path one day, masalam.
Mufti Abu Laith is not rejecter of Bukhari. He is just pointing out that it is not 100% Sahih. Akram Nadwi's writing has no relevance to what Mufti is saying.
Ok let's give this to him
What about his other stupid claims?
He literally declared everything halal.
@@AhmedBAY , Here I agree with you to some extent. We need not agree or follow the Mufti on every issue of halal or haram. There are ample of opinions of different Imams and scholars on these matters to pick from. At the end of the day one should use own rational judgement and pick the best one.
@@greengalaxy8873 true but he issues fatwas against Qur'an and sunnah.
And according to him other scholars or preachers are joke.
Pls respond to any layth's allegations instead of going around circles.. Islam was in practice much before Bukhari was compiled..
Ahadeeth were still around and known by the sahaba and tabaees which were eventually collected by the great Imam Bukhari Rahimahullah. Sahi Bukhari is one of the foundations of our religious knowledge and it's understandable why people are going after it , if you know what I mean.
@@khanofcaledonia6413 bukhari is bullshit like all hadith books written by persian Zoroastrians. Remember it was umar and his followers who defeated the persians in many key battles they suffered heavy casualties and never forgot this. So it was a deliberate ploy a cunning one at that and carefully planned strategy to undermine the arabs and the quran. They never forget this and there great grand parents whom they lost in a humiliating manner. To summarise the hadith books were carefully planted. The seerah or biography of muhammad doesn't fair much better either it was written some 200 years later it's all rumours hearsay and Chinese whispers. Peace
@@khanofcaledonia6413 No its not. The base of our religious knowledge is Quran and Sunnah and they were both relayed down to us by tawatur. Stop treating bukhari sharif like Quran.
@@mohammedjamil2277 All Ahadeeth books were written by zorastians? None of the authors of 6 authentic hadeeth books were persians.
There's enough research done on ahadeeth, daif and maudu ahadeeth are known.
It doesn't make much sense to reject them, The shariah and fiqh heavily make use of them. So, no matter how much you oppose it you are following it day and night. All the mainstream scholars never reject them and we don't care about the fringe elements like mutazila.
@@anontoure7786 Apparently you are treating Sunnah like Quran. 😀
Just because there are some maudu and daif (week) ahadeeth, you don't throw the baby with the bath water. Ulema have done enough research and we know which ones are hasan and sahi (Authentic). Our thinkers and revivalists have refuted the allegations of the munkir alhadeeth folks on hadeeth by hadeeth basis.
No body is treating hadeeth like Quran however you are bound to start interpretting Quran liberally without the hadeeth and sunnah which all the munkir ul ahadeeth people do including AbulLaith and Ghulam Parvez. That's a clear path of deviation. My cousin is on that path and has lost his faith. Aparrently some people are hungry for attention and they know becoming a mainstream scholar is not going to bring them recognition overnight unless you are Omer Sulaiman or Yaser Qadi so the path of controversies is a quick one to fame and that's what hero AbulLaith is on along with his gang. Pied Piper of Hamelin will lure some people to the river anyways.
May Allah save us from these fitn/tribulations of misguidance.
He's not Muslim
Check the satanic hand symbol
1:40 - 1:55 !! audhu billahi minash shaytanir rajim. Case closed.
Those hand signs looked deliberate
This man apparently lives in Alum Rock?
MM-528_HZ Drinking from a pint glass as well!
+enamul hoque when I originally viewed his clips I thought he was drinking Cola
MM-528_HZ Maybe he is drinking cola, but why a pint glass, it's odd especially for a "Mufti".
Abu layth may you see your errors
AsSalaamu alaikum why haven't you responded to his challenge in his last video and the guy even brought imams who talked against al a'mash and can you prove that those scholars never talked against al a'mash
Finally, I was wondering why no one called that hypocrite out, he is very dangerous as his words carry weight because of his scholar status,
I personally think the reason for his corruption is a direct result of him going to prison, is he angry because he was not protected by his status? Did he expect a miracle? I don't know, but he alone is responsible for his downfall, he cannot blame anyone but himself,
Furthermore, times are very difficult with all the islamophobia throughout the world, it's hard to defend Islam and hypocrites like the one mentioned only makes matters worse,
1. If it goes against reason or common sense
2. If it contradicts established sources. Qur'an and well established sunna....
And 3. ???... This dude quickly shut it down before he got to 3 saying "that's enough of that"... No it WASN'T enough. Let him state the third reason. You played that much. Why not play it all? Looks suspicious.
Hani S
Subhan Allah these detective type characters 🤣
Refuting people can easily backfire on you.God truly works in mysterious ways .
Have any one noticed he was making Saitanic signs with hand? He is distroying the youth.
Anyone with even little Islamic knowledge will know how wrong this so called mufti Abu layth. He’s soooooo wrong in so many ways. Ya Allah save us from such munafiqs Ameen
He uses lots of vague adjectives in his language . “Superficial, arbitrary, challenging e.t.c”
According to other ulamas even Akram nadawi is a deviant. You’re all just a part of this new toxic trend of refuting one another all while using the same antics as the person you’re criticizing. Extremely inmature … you guys are acting worse than the kardashians at least they’re entertaining compared to this clown show.
Abu layth worshipper !
Keep that flame up not the same. M@
Barakullaahu fee kum
BS means what
Bullshit
Who is this guy Abu Lahab? His talks reminds of the aayah in the Quran where Allah ordained us to follow His chosen Deen (Islam) in its entirety and not to become a hypocrite by accepting some of it as well as rejecting the rest of the scriptures.
That verse talks about accepting the whole quran and its verses, it does not talk about hadith.
Abu Lath got his pants taken off
Abdul Haleem
Shameless Santa never had his pants on in the first place.
That’s kinda sus bro
When he say the two and shows you that hand sign. Yod do know what it means search you will be amazed where he stands.
When one checks the video of Abu Shaytan (Layth) one discovers many many shias commenting.
Why blame only abu layth why not takleedis who propogate these things in society.
These guys are the same guys (Wahabhi defense) who are also casual and happy about the fact that the hadith also state that the Prophet was impotent.....I mean what nonsense is this...
Merciful Rahman and? If the prophet pbuh was impotent and it was narrated by reliable narrators how does that negate his prophet hood? Christians and Jews deem the prophet of Allah swt to be adulterers, mass murderers, liars etc but yet if our prophet pbuh became sick due to a poison that killed. Sahabi immediately after eating it his impotency negates his prophethood somehow? Stop quoting abu layth and get some actual knowledge.
Jazak Allahu khairan
Came back after watching his "Bukhari Gate" video...good luck responding to his claims 😂
We did. th-cam.com/video/3JW9_dk3shs/w-d-xo.html
ninjawarriorofthenorth lol they never responded to his claims
Assalam Alaykum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuh. The fans/Followers of Abu Layth are becoming upset. Keep that in mind. Lol is this religion about the feelings of people or showing the Truth that's beneficial to humanity (Ummah)
Abu himaar deserves to be ridiculed on all platforms .. what a joker
I'm following this debate on both ends pretty fairly and in my fair opinion I think abu layth has raised more detailed and well constructed responses than you while citing sources. He responds directly to your claims of things which you accused of him saying which he never said in the first place. You seem to be quoting mufti abu layth out of context over and over from the 1st or 2nd video and on. I noticed this when you were talking about Suleman. (Which he also responded to). You claimed he didnt know the people in the chain of hadith that he was quoting. Which was again out of context. Youre the one who first released a video against mufti abu layth becsuse he has a problem with this hadith of martial rape or hadiths like aisha being married at the age of 9. And now you're saying you never said any of this stuff. Well why did you even make a video then in the first place? Dont Lie or backtrack now. You even misquoted him in this video when you said towards the beginning of the video that he does not think sahih al bukhari is a reliable book. Thats another lie. He is not rejecting the book as a whole but pointing out the problems with the book because other people think it's a perfect flawless book. He quotes hadiths from shahi al bukhari all the time. Although you raised fair points at times It seems you're more into debating and winning rather than having an honest debate. The nature of this channel is about debating and going back and forth and embarrassing people. And you seem to be too focused on that rather than making and focusing on the subject at hand. It's getting to your head.
In this video it seemed like you blatantly ignored his challenge which he presented to you. Which was to bring one hadith (which is all mufti abu layth asked for) which cant be criticized from its chain. Or something along that. You had about 2 weeks to do this. Yet you waited until this article dropped and now you seem to be hiding behind this article. In fact you didnt even mention that challenge in this video. You clearly had time to release other videos in the past 2 weeks and even go live on TH-cam. Yet you didnt rise to his challenge or respond until this article came out. Why is that? If he is so wrong should you not just cite your sources and read directly from whichever book you wish to like he does at times?
I'm all for a good open discussion but I'm not a fan boy like most people who easily support you or mufti abu layth like a political party. Stop lying/misquoting and just cite your logic and source. You missed nearly all of his critical points from his last response.
Faraz Khurshid agree with you Faraz
100% agree
Faraz Khurshid
You appear to lack basic knowledge that's why you can't decipher right from wrong. Do you actually check his sources?? Each and everyone of them... I don't give this Dajjal the time of day he appeals to those who follow their desires Islam doesn't suit your desires you have to change yourself to fit Islam Not the other way around. It's not about if it doesn't make sense to you... who are we to make these judgments?? Most people are brainWashed by society and want Islam to fit with their logic. Common that is not how Islam works.
Regarding his challenge... the only people who care about it is you guys for everyone else,it's sufficient that he just rejects Hadith based on his desires. Here he has clearly been caught misinterpreting what his guy said, just so he can fool people into sharing his understanding. Most are not fooled many knowledgeable people have refuted him. The only people who follow him are those who lack knowledge and thefore believe anything they are told purely because it "makes sense" to there brainWashed minds, your taking your deen from a dajjal may Allah guide you.
Aa1izer A See this is how i know you dont understand the situation. Mufti abu layth argument is actually based on the LACK of evidence for the chain of sahih al bukhari to us. "I dont give this dajjal the time of my day..." well why are you commenting then buddy? Lol you clearly admitted to not listening to his position and blindly following sunni defense. You're the exact type of FAN BOY I was reffering to in my comment. You assume sunni defense is right while admitting you dont even list to your oppositions argument. This is the exact problem with many religious people across all religions. Dont get involved in this if you dont plan on using your head with fair judgement. Be part of the solution not the problem my friend.
And might I add about the source....let's assume for a second 100% of mufti abu layths sources were false....the ideas is that AT LEAST he is quoting something. I'm highly curious as to what Sunni Defense's real argument even is now. Because in this video he said that he never said anything about accepting or rejecting the hadith on martial rape or anything about abu layth....which is again not true. Sunni defense came at mufti abu layth for criticizing a hadith originally and now hes back tracking. If he never had an issue in the first place why make the original video and start all this? And all of it WITHOUT SOURCES. Mufti abu layth reads directly from a book at times and even gives the name of the book and author. It's easy to assume without evidence that he is lying on purpose....or you're in denial. If you're saying hes lying and hes quoting previous scholars then you're essentially saying they're all wrong too including people like Imam Malik.
As for the challenge...sunni defense had 2 weeks to say something...they were and still are silent on that challenge. I dont think you realize something. If Sunni defense say that challenge is impossible to meet, then they're in agreement with mufti abu layth. If not then that means they should make a video with their argument, reasoning, and sources and end the debate right then and there. If mufti abu layth is so wrong why is this so hard to do? Why cant sunni defense say "listen guy here are the reasons abu layth is wrong." Why hide behind the article of another sheikh? This sitiuation is bringing out the ugly side of Sunni defense. you're throwing out vague terms that even you cant define. "People of knowledge." Abu layth is a strict follower of imamMalik. Is imam Malik not a person of knowledge now? Mufti abu layth quotes sahih al bukhari at times. is sahih al bukhari not a person of knowledge now? Choose your words carefully, you're refuting your own argument. You have 0 proof he rejects certain hadiths based on his personal desires. Other scholars including sahih al bukhari rejected hadiths. Imam Malik and the other 3 imams rejected each others hadiths. Are they all people of personal desires too?
Stop being a fan boy, use your head.
Wenutz he barely addressed the side points lol he even misquoted mufti abu layth on the side arguments. Honestly I dont even know what their motive or argument is at this point. They seem to be jumping all over the place and have been silent since mufti abu layths last detailed video in which he posed the challenged. I thought sunni defense made sound and decent claims in video #2 I think it was. Since then the mufti has responded to alot of important points raised up by sunni defense. However the vise versa is non existence. If this sitiuation is doing anything its exposing sunni defense hunger to win an argument like a child rather than discuss topics properly. This is the same type of situation mufti abu layth ran into with another shiekh. He wanted such a formal debate and whatnot instead of just discussing points back and forth.
He cherry picks the points from article and portrays in such a way in which he can shame abu layth..
You are doing nothing than shaming abu layth. He atleast comes up with some detailed arguements, unlike you obviously.
Layth is obviously knowledgeable but he cuts & pastes too much and his hypocrisy has been found out, he has links to the Shia's to Qulliam, I believe he has sold his religion for this life, I hope Allah swt puts him back on the right path, even majority Sunni Sufis reject him & have labelled him as a complete stupid idiot.
Fake news from a Shia twisting words
This guy loves putting up he’s devil signs
Shaikh Akram is staying true to the deen. I wouldn't describe it as 'throwing so-and-so under the bus'. A Muslim's obligation is to Allah and His Messenger (s) and thus to the truth. It is more apt to say that Abu Layth has possibly been lying about Shaikh Nadwi.
You talk shit. Akram Nadawi and Abu Layth held a seminar on jinn posession and black magic not existing.
@@ExclusiveShi they also said fiqh is outdated lool😭😭
Wasn't Akram Nadwi a supporter of Abu Layth. I saw him in a memri video they were all chummy.
@@br4885 what are you trying to say because I did not imply that sahih bukhari is unreliable
I would not be surprised if he starts questioning authenticity of the Quran
Lol
Bro if u debate Abu layth he will destroy you so much, you'll shut down your channel
You're delusional
Its time fr u go n debate with Mufti😂 ...... U cnt 😂
These people would never dare. 😜
Why waste time debating a fool... The fool will get attention that he desperately craves.
@@kasimshaikh3750 Then why wasting time discussing on fool :)
@@faheemnp because idiots like you follow him
FARID GANGU TELI !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The love these hadiithers have for bukhaari n his gossip is next level I tell ya
Always attacking people when you can’t answer a question 🤣🤣🤦🏿♂️
HE IS A DAJAL
the delusional mufti
So deviant
Abu Layth the best
@Abdi Basr you need to be refuted you deviant 😂
I would hate to be in his household abu's that is
Most of guys who talked about Abu layth I would say has not really listened to him but have just heard what he is saying cause to truly listen to someone, it should not be based on your prejudices against that person but majority are listening to him with their prejudices since he is bringing out lot of falsehood out of these hadith's .in my opinion and for anyone who is truly honest to find the truth will find majority of what he is saying makes sense , because every common sensecale Muslim knows that all those so called sahih book are full of nonsense Hadith that degrade the prophet and Islam .
Not that I care about abou layth or any of these so called scholars who claim to be on the right . One thing I respect about Abu layth is that he is not calling you into a sexy or to follow him but he is just sharing his knowledge of the Hadith in addition he is having his opinion so that anyone who disagree with him can challenge him
abu syi'ah