OK wow, this is actually kind of an origin story. For the _Squickerwonkers_ ! In case you´ve never heard of them... But seriously, I just immediately fell in love with her in this, even though I thought, Kate was one of the ugliest people on Lost..... Her charisma in this and natural wit just killed me and earned my heart. First with moments like 4:42 and then with how she all behaved like after 5:19... OMG just where like 90% of female guests would feel uncomfortable, Evangeline is just getting started and being playful. And she just instantly won my heart over with her behavior.....................................
@@nunopereira526 I'm not quite sure. Somewhere around 2011, I think. I think they let JRT voice Geoff full time around late 2011, early 2012. Here he still only has his prerecorded phrases. I can't double check, I don't have the full original episode anymore. I deleted them once I was done editing the clips to save space. But I'm probably reasonably correct with my assessment. 👍
Also a very good lesson in human psychology. Like the Interview gets VERY interesting after 5:19. But you gotta pay attention to Evangeline's body language. After she's done with her act, like around 5:51, she starts fixing her hair, which at least is an indicator of minor sexual interest or arousal. 🤭😅 Which is interesting. And it fascinates me, because even Craig himself isn't quite "conventionally attractive" as they say, right? But it's his humor, his wit, his charme, his ability to play on words and - IF NEEDED - be necessary to lie your way out, just in a way that your female guest will feel most comfortable with........ AND .... He just always seems to know the perfect "flirty" way to response, doesn't he?.......
Body language reading is about as far as you can get from exact science. Therr is a reason that it is seldom admissible in court. People try to get traction out of it, when therr is nothing to get at all.
@@timeformegamanI agree partially, I certainly read way too much into it in the first place. But it doesn't necessarily mean all that body language means NOTHING. It certainly means something. And I have learned a lot about it in recent years but I've also been read and "diagnosed" with stuff that wasn't correct at all in the situation. So yes, people do sometimes read signals wrong, I'm only interested in reading stuff right.
@@chanceneck8072 There is no reading it right. There is no set rules to measure everyone by. Not everyone does the same thing when conveying a message. We read our biases into reality. If you want to see something, you will see it.
@@timeformegaman Of course there is reading something right. Individually. You wanna say, you can only be read wrong? Is that your statement? You're trying to say that everyone in every situation has only read you WRONG? 🤨
@@chanceneck8072 No. I have no idea how that is what you took from my statement. This is an example of what I was saying, we look through the lens of our biases. And your bias is that body language is flawed, but still useful on some level, so you uncharitably evaluated my statement the way you did. I am saying that it is not a useful approximation of how a person is relating something to someone. Someone might see you sitting with crossed legs one day, and assume you are feeling vulnerable, and they might be right. But if they see you sitting with crossed legs the next day, and assume you are vulnerable, but you are feeling hopefully instead, their evaluation of the situation based off of their body langauge knowledge was flawed. Maybe there is dome value to the analysis on some level, but I have never seen that analysis competently demonstrated by anyone on-line or in real life.
@@shayaxelrod7691 Me, too. But some of the interview segments were interesting. I still have a very old one that I could post, where James Earl Jones was the guest. And I think they hadn't even Geoff on the show yet. I think that interview was quite interesting, too. But I don't know if I should post it. Regardless, more content is still coming this month FOR SURE! 👍
OK wow, this is actually kind of an origin story. For the _Squickerwonkers_ ! In case you´ve never heard of them...
But seriously, I just immediately fell in love with her in this, even though I thought, Kate was one of the ugliest people on Lost.....
Her charisma in this and natural wit just killed me and earned my heart. First with moments like 4:42 and then with how she all behaved like after 5:19... OMG just where like 90% of female guests would feel uncomfortable, Evangeline is just getting started and being playful. And she just instantly won my heart over with her behavior.....................................
She´s just SOOOO fucking cute, I can´t take it........................
This interview was full of passion and sexiness lol
Craig met his match with Lily when it comes to flirting, she's a complete champion level flirter.
Carrie Keagan did way better
What a woman!
She's attractive
Incredible.
And she DID publish the Squickerwonkers Story AFTER this Interview. So, kudos for these two, I would say!
calm down virgin
What a BEAUTIFUL woman !!
Loved Lost. Then it Lost us all. Great interview .
Love her. Smart, sassy and beautiful.
Stunning woman !
my queen Evangeline
Good point by Craig. Humans disrupting Hawaii ecosystem
The conversation from 3:59 onward is hilarious
I loved her as Kate! ❤❤❤
She was on fire ❤
The late 90s and 2000's (up to ~2010) truly were the glory days, when men and women were allowed to enjoy flirting on TV. No one could do this now.
How old is this interview?
@@nunopereira526 I'm not quite sure. Somewhere around 2011, I think. I think they let JRT voice Geoff full time around late 2011, early 2012. Here he still only has his prerecorded phrases.
I can't double check, I don't have the full original episode anymore. I deleted them once I was done editing the clips to save space. But I'm probably reasonably correct with my assessment. 👍
She has amazing legs wow !
La femme de mes reves quand j etais jeune
“The woman of my dreams since I was young.”
Evangeline could very well be the most attractive woman in the world, at least that's what I think 😍
3:58-4:13 Oooh... 😮😮😛😍
Also a very good lesson in human psychology. Like the Interview gets VERY interesting after 5:19. But you gotta pay attention to Evangeline's body language. After she's done with her act, like around 5:51, she starts fixing her hair, which at least is an indicator of minor sexual interest or arousal. 🤭😅
Which is interesting. And it fascinates me, because even Craig himself isn't quite "conventionally attractive" as they say, right? But it's his humor, his wit, his charme, his ability to play on words and - IF NEEDED - be necessary to lie your way out, just in a way that your female guest will feel most comfortable with........ AND .... He just always seems to know the perfect "flirty" way to response, doesn't he?.......
Body language reading is about as far as you can get from exact science. Therr is a reason that it is seldom admissible in court. People try to get traction out of it, when therr is nothing to get at all.
@@timeformegamanI agree partially, I certainly read way too much into it in the first place. But it doesn't necessarily mean all that body language means NOTHING. It certainly means something. And I have learned a lot about it in recent years but I've also been read and "diagnosed" with stuff that wasn't correct at all in the situation. So yes, people do sometimes read signals wrong, I'm only interested in reading stuff right.
@@chanceneck8072
There is no reading it right. There is no set rules to measure everyone by. Not everyone does the same thing when conveying a message.
We read our biases into reality. If you want to see something, you will see it.
@@timeformegaman Of course there is reading something right. Individually. You wanna say, you can only be read wrong? Is that your statement? You're trying to say that everyone in every situation has only read you WRONG? 🤨
@@chanceneck8072
No. I have no idea how that is what you took from my statement. This is an example of what I was saying, we look through the lens of our biases. And your bias is that body language is flawed, but still useful on some level, so you uncharitably evaluated my statement the way you did.
I am saying that it is not a useful approximation of how a person is relating something to someone. Someone might see you sitting with crossed legs one day, and assume you are feeling vulnerable, and they might be right. But if they see you sitting with crossed legs the next day, and assume you are vulnerable, but you are feeling hopefully instead, their evaluation of the situation based off of their body langauge knowledge was flawed.
Maybe there is dome value to the analysis on some level, but I have never seen that analysis competently demonstrated by anyone on-line or in real life.
I usually skip this part
@@shayaxelrod7691 Me, too. But some of the interview segments were interesting.
I still have a very old one that I could post, where James Earl Jones was the guest. And I think they hadn't even Geoff on the show yet.
I think that interview was quite interesting, too. But I don't know if I should post it.
Regardless, more content is still coming this month FOR SURE! 👍
Too bad she bought into pseudoscience and lost her sanity.
Is that so?
Too bad indeed then..
Maybe she can make a return....
Is it like homeopathy bad or like flat earth bad?
It’s the other way round, most of society did that…went along with the crazy mandates.
I forget how common transphobia was back then.
Uh, it wasn't. No one cared about it. Go through all of Craig's videos and find another reference to trans anything.
I disagree with being transgender, but I don’t hate them. I hate the sin they are in.
It was a better time
lol fuck off these were better times
Nah