This is one of the reasons housing prices in HK remains sky high and keeps growing unchecked. Too many people with vested interests who care only about their profits and who don't give a damn about the less privileged being forced to live in sub-par environments. Property speculation has always been the bane of affordable housing anywhere in the world and needs to be curbed. On the other hand, it doesn't seem to make a lot of sense for the HK government to spend so much of taxpayers' money building temporary homes only to tear them down 7 years later. Even short-lease public housing in Singapore for example lasts 30 years at least.
謝謝海星校長和各老師！學生們，你們真幸福！
原來水深火熱唔係冇屋住，而係要住市區; 所以就要用二百幾億公帑起臨屋比佢哋然後5年拆。
謝謝分享
阿Ann 都有點多餘
轉工唔得嘅
死係要响官塘返工
搬去官塘住囉
記者誤導屯門往官塘方法
屯門元朗大把老人院啦，搵嚟講
呢屆政府做得好，香港經濟，恒指同地價一齊閪冧，香港國際上角色同新加坡交換，李顯龍躺平都贏，期待香港推埋8萬5政策🎉
理論上簡約公屋都只係住幾年
上唔到樓/唔會資格上樓既劏房戶，俾佢地住都冇乜用
屯門明明有巴士直接去觀塘, 記者偏偏要搵一個最複雜既方法, 好奇怪….misleading
係屯門搵過份工應該都唔難
吳明點解一定要去觀塘返工，市場上大把工作空缺
安泰就應該無車直達既.... 而且記者應該係避屯公+觀塘道兩大黑路?
I just find out this is a very good program to watch. 🙏👍👏
時代應該要有變化，絕對支持簡約學校…呢啲先至係幸福！👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼
简約公屋遠近不是大問題，最大問題，就是3年以申請公屋合资格可以搬入'去住。但分分钟住2至3年上樓。因為，政府3年以下申請简約乙類，單位比較小，給有須要人仕入住。所以，3年以下住劏房基層一样公屋輪，等他們搬才可以申請入住。到時入住己時間短不会考慮入住，只有浪費空置，因為地方遠，3年以下永遠逼住劏房，直至政府可以上楼為止。所以基層根本脱离不到劏房。
唔識轉入去屯門工作嗎！？
简約公屋五年期可以暫住是好事，租金便宜，但是。政府有沒有考慮基層，已3年以上可以申請，申請3年以下如何解決入住简約公屋。但是，3年以上受惠多，但他們分分住住2。。3年可以上楼，到時空置單位，給3年以下的人申請入住。到時只可以住2年简約己經到期。我地上不到樓。要搬回劏房。所以，政府有沒有考慮到3年以下申請公屋市民。希望政府真正考慮這問題。
香港政府就真係執石頭擲自己腳，繼續搞商業區啦，最好响中環起公屋👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼
荃灣起公屋得唔得？
覺得納稅人慘d，公務員用既係公帑，對公務員黎講，冇乜影響😂
香港人有呢d精英公務員，真係好幸福🤣
原來躺平可以住市區靚地段🎉
佢當時話有信心啦，否則佢個位要換人呀！
我可以在學校做義工嗎？🙏🏻😊
轉工咪得囉ar ann 我住市區返工返屯門南都要兩個鐘啦
其實佢間劏房都算企理...同簡約公屋差唔多
更何況未必住到大單位
2個鐘？一日有幾多個2個鐘？其實你咁樣唔係咁正常
@@leo-nd6ob 打個比喻
買樓嗰個都要睇餸食飯,政府津貼重要就居民遠近,俾$重差過無$,重叫人努力,乜羅輯.
政府自制炸彈,五年後必拆，突然湧出大量劏房戶又冇接合方案,買定花生
唔拆咪解決佐囉, 驚班居民炸佐啲樓咩.... 到時遊行反對可能都已經犯法啦 =)
So selfish, because it might affect your property resell value, then it became a problem… excuses after excuses… speechless
This is one of the reasons housing prices in HK remains sky high and keeps growing unchecked. Too many people with vested interests who care only about their profits and who don't give a damn about the less privileged being forced to live in sub-par environments. Property speculation has always been the bane of affordable housing anywhere in the world and needs to be curbed. On the other hand, it doesn't seem to make a lot of sense for the HK government to spend so much of taxpayers' money building temporary homes only to tear them down 7 years later. Even short-lease public housing in Singapore for example lasts 30 years at least.
im thinking exactly the same thing 咁都講得出口 仲要 理直氣壯 how on earth u can say it with a straight face i hv no idea
成件事本未倒置，為咗基層 將香港長遠發展變成 即食麵
讚口不絕？讚不絕口？
講到尾驚樓價跌班自私鬼
普通ㄧ間屋都只是幾元ㄧ尺管理费,何解簡约公屋贵幾倍都唔得,纳税人俾唔覺肉赤,磚才喎!係唔同D架.
快d起啦
大部份簡約房戶都是新移民，貪香港福利，等上公屋，不值同情。
大陸要振興內房，最簡單的是將每日百五個單程證的家庭在大陸團聚，肯定內房市場會活躍起來，經濟復甦；又可以減輕香港樓房價格和租金壓力，使年輕有機會上樓，減少怨氣，一舉兩得，簡直是雙贏。
送啲人返大灣區住仲好啦