2 little things I noticed that could help you. 1 when you zoom in, make sure to read the ranging because every tank handles 0-500 differently. For instance the t-72 is rightward. So make sure to check the range and align the indicator with it. 2 once you fire just start spamming r. I see you wait a short period before reloading. In tank vs tank the 0.5 second difference can sometimes win you the fight Other than that keep up the good work :)
That Bradley fight you saved yourself by tracking the Bradley, that second tow shot would have killed you but you changed its trajectory by tracking the Bradley and forcing the gun to aim down hitting your track which should have cause minimal to no damage.
Seeing that second TOW wire go trailing overhead: Christ. That was enough to trigger a ‘significant emotional event’ response. Pucker factor = 1000, resulted in cramping lol
I've had a 1,000 JDAM hit just over 400m away, and that wasn't nearly as scary as having a missile break wire as it's passing overhead to hit some asshole on a ridgeline. That missile going out of control is burned into my brain.
To everyone saying why does it take X amount of rounds to kill the reason is that THIS IS A VIDEO GAME and prioritizes fun and gameplay balance over the realism of everything
@@RhaegarDefense I think I would know considering I have about 2k hours in this game and run a server. This isnt Arma 3 or Ready or Not, its squad. The game devs themselves say they care more for fun and dont call the game a milsim.
honestly, the youtube comments are not anywhere near the actual gameplay community as far as ive experienced. most people are a treat to play with and the game is pretty dang fun
Idk man, most of these comments are just constructive criticism, and when the owner responds most of the conversations between the creator and commenters is pretty nice.
I hate how terrible the realism when it comes to armor is in squad. I watched an Abrams hit a t72 like 4 times on the lfp before it died like huh? That’s a one shot practically guaranteed. Not to mention that ATGM from the Bradley. ( although poorly placed i promise that gunner would’ve been evaporated) It’s just painful to see a game like warthunder having done a better job. Hopefully squad devs will make their improvements. Or not.
Jesus those paid actors... Good for you, but keep practicing ! That 1st shot on the Bradley was completely offset (and you know it because you don't miss later on)
Pretty rookie Bradley crew. Commander was looking right at the T-72 with the (CIV) and should have used commander over ride to swing his gunner right on to the target since it’s an A3. Or crest the hill with only the turret exposed. But hey who am I, only an X-Bradley gunner with the Big Red One and only spent countless hours doing BATS simulators...
@@gandalfdafavela1044 The only reason would have been breaking the turret's rotation indeed as the Bradley wasn't looking this way while pulling up. To do so however, you just need to hit the turret, no specific spot. Hitting "the camera" - aka the commander's camera - should do about jack shit nothing (which checks with Jordan's explantation of being drunk). Against a Bradley from the front, there isn't a real weakspot so... Yeah. If it shows its side, ammo rack; if it shows its ass well, do you need an invitation ?
@@unfazer-v2260 lol i feel really stupid because i woke up and looked at what i had commented and was like oh wow so i guess i just made that up when i was drunk lol
Why the hell is it taking more than 1 apfsds to kill these lightly armored vehicles? Any round from the T-72 will kill it it one hit. HE, HEAT or APFSDS.
If this game is at all realistic then you should loat HEAT (3BK29) for any soft skinned vehicles like Trucks and Bradley's, keep HE-FRAG (3OF-26?) for Infantry and 3BM-60 for tanks. Of course if AP is in the tube then fire that.
@@BaranRibose Indeed, AP will do more damage to the Bradley in most situation as far as I'm aware. What's being said for lighter targets is true however.
@@elitewavez4768 It's not a simulation, but it's very realistic nontheless. At least if you compare it to other FPS on the market. That being said, it's a game, so balancing is to be taken into account =/= with a simulation.
I'm a PR player and even I don't do that. The sense of hopelessness after they bail out a 20min run away from their nearest ally is always more satisfying than just letting them respawn. Either way you got their tickets.
I find your ammo choice funny, HEAT against Truck, AP against light armoured APC Okay Bradley vs AP is not bad, but I would Use HE against truck and HEAT against APCs, and Bradley (and IFVs but Puma and Namer), HEAT as well, mostly because no armour (alluminion) .
@@Uf0nius I know, its just ammo saving, I never played Squad, but PR, in that I would be running AP, and then if I see infantry switch to HE, maybe go to HEAT if I see a parked light Vehicle.
@@gerfand hey did you know in squad that apfsds one shots a heli while he wont. squad isnt hyper realistic like warthunder or post scriptum but its good enough + ingame he is usually infantry only and heat is light vehicles. apfsds is best against a tank or heli or even an ifv
@@evilestwheat8266 i was talking HEAT not HE. I know damage model and stuff, its just that HEAT would save APFSD ammo, so if I knew I was going to engage a APC next I would switch ammo
in squad the damage model of each Ammo type is very weird. AP does the most damage to Armor (including lightly armored vehicles like Strykers and Bradleys) while HEAT does the most damage to light vehicles.
I was about the point out things that went wrong in this vid but i see you are very excited about your performance. Let me tell you that you will be able to do MUCH MUCH more in this game when you learn more about the vehicles and how to use them effectively.
turn on turret stabilization lol, otherwise nice compilation
I did it's just my computer lagging
@@BaranRibose classic Squad gameplay
@@BaranRibose lmao
I liked, how the Bradley's gunner tried to see where the projectile flew
kinda wish squad had the same tanking mechanics like War Thunder had.
Bradleys should not be taking direct hits from T72s like that, unless its HE
First hit killed driver,but he should aim at the turret after that.
Why shouldnt it?
@@ZapytajRedditPolska Because there is no way the Bradley has the armor to stop a APFSDS from the main gun of a modern tank.
@@austinpak2302 t72 is nowhere being a modern tank and its not shooting apfsds
@@ZapytajRedditPolska its not? Lmao what?
2 little things I noticed that could help you.
1 when you zoom in, make sure to read the ranging because every tank handles 0-500 differently. For instance the t-72 is rightward. So make sure to check the range and align the indicator with it.
2 once you fire just start spamming r. I see you wait a short period before reloading. In tank vs tank the 0.5 second difference can sometimes win you the fight
Other than that keep up the good work :)
Also make sure you're enabling stabilization by pressing Z
That Bradley fight you saved yourself by tracking the Bradley, that second tow shot would have killed you but you changed its trajectory by tracking the Bradley and forcing the gun to aim down hitting your track which should have cause minimal to no damage.
Seeing that second TOW wire go trailing overhead: Christ. That was enough to trigger a ‘significant emotional event’ response. Pucker factor = 1000, resulted in cramping lol
I've had a 1,000 JDAM hit just over 400m away, and that wasn't nearly as scary as having a missile break wire as it's passing overhead to hit some asshole on a ridgeline. That missile going out of control is burned into my brain.
Yea I screwed up pretty badly with that miss
if the Bradley was good he may have actually killed us right there
"Significant Emotional Event" comment seen
"Oh bugger the tank is on fire" response sent
That first guy gets shot instantly and his buddy is just chilling there for what seems like forever.
You're finally awake
To everyone saying why does it take X amount of rounds to kill the reason is that THIS IS A VIDEO GAME and prioritizes fun and gameplay balance over the realism of everything
Squad does not, in fact, prioritise fun and balancing over realism. They put realism first, then fun and balancing.
@@RhaegarDefense I think I would know considering I have about 2k hours in this game and run a server. This isnt Arma 3 or Ready or Not, its squad. The game devs themselves say they care more for fun and dont call the game a milsim.
Man your driver needs to communicate with you more. He could have put you on a nice hull down to fight that Bradley
I think he was pretty new to the game so I don't blame him too much
these comments are the only thing keeping me from getting this game tbh. jeez, the community just cant be happy for you. its a game lads, chill out
honestly, the youtube comments are not anywhere near the actual gameplay community as far as ive experienced. most people are a treat to play with and the game is pretty dang fun
Idk man, most of these comments are just constructive criticism, and when the owner responds most of the conversations between the creator and commenters is pretty nice.
0:30 and this is why there are rules set in place for one manning
We need all that practice ✨
Inshallah 🧕
forget the people being rude. Tanks are very hard to position, difficult to use and require a lot of communication.
I hate how terrible the realism when it comes to armor is in squad. I watched an Abrams hit a t72 like 4 times on the lfp before it died like huh? That’s a one shot practically guaranteed. Not to mention that ATGM from the Bradley. ( although poorly placed i promise that gunner would’ve been evaporated) It’s just painful to see a game like warthunder having done a better job. Hopefully squad devs will make their improvements. Or not.
It is definitely intentional for balancing.
Jesus those paid actors... Good for you, but keep practicing !
That 1st shot on the Bradley was completely offset (and you know it because you don't miss later on)
1. yes I paid around 20 ppl for this whole skit
2. Im aware, Im sad I missed the one shot opportunity
@@BaranRibose I feel that. As I said - and you knew it already - gotta practice some more ^^
I think he was most likely trying to lead for the movement of the tank but the driver started slowing down
What's this game
Edit: My bad, I checked the description and it was Squad. Sorry.
use your stabilizer man its killing me when you're not using it lol
Pretty rookie Bradley crew. Commander was looking right at the T-72 with the (CIV) and should have used commander over ride to swing his gunner right on to the target since it’s an A3. Or crest the hill with only the turret exposed. But hey who am I, only an X-Bradley gunner with the Big Red One and only spent countless hours doing BATS simulators...
Neither of us had commanders because pubs are like that
see that targeting camera on the bradley. next time aim for that but nice plays bro
Is that you yellow blitzer
what targeting camera? and why? because he's gonna lost the turret and then will became more difficult to fire?
@@gandalfdafavela1044 sorry i was drunk as fuck when i typed this i can barely remember it i think i was trying to be smart or something idk haha
@@gandalfdafavela1044 The only reason would have been breaking the turret's rotation indeed as the Bradley wasn't looking this way while pulling up. To do so however, you just need to hit the turret, no specific spot. Hitting "the camera" - aka the commander's camera - should do about jack shit nothing (which checks with Jordan's explantation of being drunk). Against a Bradley from the front, there isn't a real weakspot so... Yeah. If it shows its side, ammo rack; if it shows its ass well, do you need an invitation ?
@@unfazer-v2260 lol i feel really stupid because i woke up and looked at what i had commented and was like oh wow so i guess i just made that up when i was drunk lol
Why the hell is it taking more than 1 apfsds to kill these lightly armored vehicles? Any round from the T-72 will kill it it one hit. HE, HEAT or APFSDS.
realism
If this game is at all realistic then you should loat HEAT (3BK29) for any soft skinned vehicles like Trucks and Bradley's, keep HE-FRAG (3OF-26?) for Infantry and 3BM-60 for tanks. Of course if AP is in the tube then fire that.
I'm not sure if this is true but I heard that AP does more dmg to Bradleys
Correct me if wrong
@@BaranRibose Indeed, AP will do more damage to the Bradley in most situation as far as I'm aware. What's being said for lighter targets is true however.
The game isn't rally realistic but meh
@@elitewavez4768 It's not a simulation, but it's very realistic nontheless. At least if you compare it to other FPS on the market.
That being said, it's a game, so balancing is to be taken into account =/= with a simulation.
@@unfazer-v2260 true I agree
What game is this?
Bro just dump an HE round into that transport truck lol
I don't get HE rounds , I only get HEAT and Armor piercing
first clip classic squad dork not even trying to take out the fleeing inf, unlike chad PR players who would do exactly that
I have slow reflexes but I'll try to improve with practice
@@BaranRibose 😭👌
I'm a PR player and even I don't do that. The sense of hopelessness after they bail out a 20min run away from their nearest ally is always more satisfying than just letting them respawn. Either way you got their tickets.
I find your ammo choice funny, HEAT against Truck, AP against light armoured APC
Okay Bradley vs AP is not bad, but I would Use HE against truck and HEAT against APCs, and Bradley (and IFVs but Puma and Namer), HEAT as well, mostly because no armour (alluminion)
.
Doesn't matter in Squad. AP can be used against any vic and it will deal roughly same damage.
@@Uf0nius I know, its just ammo saving, I never played Squad, but PR, in that I would be running AP, and then if I see infantry switch to HE, maybe go to HEAT if I see a parked light Vehicle.
@@gerfand hey did you know in squad that apfsds one shots a heli while he wont. squad isnt hyper realistic like warthunder or post scriptum but its good enough + ingame he is usually infantry only and heat is light vehicles. apfsds is best against a tank or heli or even an ifv
@@evilestwheat8266 i was talking HEAT not HE.
I know damage model and stuff, its just that HEAT would save APFSD ammo, so if I knew I was going to engage a APC next I would switch ammo
in squad the damage model of each Ammo type is very weird. AP does the most damage to Armor (including lightly armored vehicles like Strykers and Bradleys) while HEAT does the most damage to light vehicles.
Bradley survive after 125mm
Realism
The driver would have a melon sized hole in his chest on that 2nd shot
Show! What is this game?
1:00 where was the friendly that died?
the damage model is so stupid lmao.
Why not just blasting that truck in the beginning with the 125mm right away lol
Honestly yea
Oh I see why. Wow
Alhamduillah
I was about the point out things that went wrong in this vid but i see you are very excited about your performance. Let me tell you that you will be able to do MUCH MUCH more in this game when you learn more about the vehicles and how to use them effectively.
Thanks for the motivation man
POV: you’re not a Russian trained tanker and not in Ukraine.
No you are a russian tanker in ukraine duaring "counter offence"
CGI.
What name this game
Average us army
I thought this was a video about Ukraine
It is in a way
it says t72 not t64
some people have clue how to
play armor. in this game
In my bradley if u missed that shot ud be long gone
Yea ik about my mistakes
The forgetful gondola holoprosencephaly slap because tuna naturalistically cheer within a wretched vein. boiling, shrill hope
Meanwhile in reality...cope cage.
seethe
Meanwhile in reality... one TOS-1 barrage and battalion's dead.
Look at you westerners...
t-72>abrams
ur aim kinda bad
kinda wish squad had the same tanking mechanics like War Thunder had.
Bradleys should not be taking direct hits from T72s like that, unless its HE
Its Sabot
Which game is this?
What game is this?
Squad