Chris Luxon: Genetic engineering, farming emissions, and capital gains taxes | Q+A 2023

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 มิ.ย. 2023
  • National leader Chris Luxon announces that a future National government would reverse the ban on genetic engineering technology, along with answering questions on farming emissions, capital gains taxes, and abortion.
    Subscribe to Q+A: bit.ly/QandASubscribe
    Join Jack Tame and the Q+A team and find the answers to the questions that matter. Made with the support of NZ on Air.
    WATCH SUNDAY 9AM ON TVNZ1 OR CATCH UP ON DEMAND: www.tvnz.co.nz/shows/q-and-a/
    FOLLOW Q+A ON SOCIAL MEDIA
    Facebook: / nzqanda
    Twitter: / nzqanda
    For stories that matter to you and the very latest from Aotearoa and around the world: 1News.co.nz/

ความคิดเห็น • 424

  • @sagarluu1843
    @sagarluu1843 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The interviewer is more clued up than Chris :(

  • @theecanmole
    @theecanmole 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    20:24 "You own 4 investment properties, more than any other M.P. You want to be Prime Minister. and one of your explicit promises is to oppose capital gains tax that would tax people like you?"

    • @maaduece5132
      @maaduece5132 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      And probably a large portion of the people who would consider voting for him . Everything is not about his personal gain

    • @mrspecialk1234
      @mrspecialk1234 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Helen Clark owned 5 properties when she was ousted in 2008…..

  • @optimumperformance
    @optimumperformance 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    No problem with GMO? Go ask India and other such countries.

    • @noedelman
      @noedelman 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They loved it there until ideologues got it banned. Now more poison is used and people are hungry.

    • @thesealab8947
      @thesealab8947 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ask them what?

  • @theecanmole
    @theecanmole 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    18:60 "How do I know you are not just opposing a capital gains tax because that will mean you will pay more tax?"

    • @jtonline99
      @jtonline99 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      He still didn’t give an answer, other than to “trust him”

  • @BanterousLemon
    @BanterousLemon 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

    It's concerning to me that a party who wants to "fix the economy" does not want a CGT given Treasury, RBNZ, IRD, MBIE and the previous two TWG's have advocated in some way for a CGT. We're the only country in the OECD without one, we're one of the only countries in the world with issues related to housing skewed to the extreme degree they currently are. Yes, housing is expensive around the world but not to the same degree it is here. A CGT won't change the housing issues but it does lend the government more money to invest in the infrastructure that would allow those homes to be built in the first place. And it's fairer that landlords pay tax for their gains when their renters pay 20-39% of their tax for every hour of their life spent being productive.

    • @dshan46
      @dshan46 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Lol you have no idea what you're talking about, CGT will drag us further into recession

    • @maaduece5132
      @maaduece5132 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      What's the government s current record for building and supplying rental accommodation?

    • @jtonline99
      @jtonline99 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@maaduece5132 pretty good actually. While kiwibuild was a balls up it still has delivered a decent number of additional houses, meanwhile kaianga ora have been guns blazing delivering social housing. Stark contrast to National booting tenants out of 2500 houses to flog them off to commercial interests.

    • @reddragon9918
      @reddragon9918 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@maaduece5132 not great under National, who sold and demolished 7000 state houses and then tried to pin it on the successive government

    • @chrismckellar9350
      @chrismckellar9350 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@maaduece5132 - What has National provided in affordable rental accommodation when they were in government other than saying there is no housing crisis.

  • @Joedaviesio
    @Joedaviesio 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    i cant remember the houses i bought between 4 - 10 years ago and i have no idea how much value they've increased by 🤣

    • @rogerdewhurst5750
      @rogerdewhurst5750 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      And by how much has the value (buying power) of the money decreased? Much the same probably.

    • @fe6767
      @fe6767 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@rogerdewhurst5750 But the buying power of money has decreased for people who pay tax as well as for those that don't pay tax. The decrease in the buying power of money is not an argument why some wealth gain is taxed and other wealth gain is not.

    • @FRED-gx2qk
      @FRED-gx2qk 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Porkies

    • @silenthawkstudios9924
      @silenthawkstudios9924 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@rogerdewhurst5750 Inflation of housing, has far outpaced inflation of just about every single other good or service.

    • @stormchaser300
      @stormchaser300 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      To many people with to many houses there should be a limit on houses you own i would say 2.

  • @davidkennedy8871
    @davidkennedy8871 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

    Hmm, so National are going to remove the climate targets for agriculture and remove our agriculture GE free status which has huge economic value. For many global consumers, GE in agriculture allows for greater use of herbicides and pesticides. The best way to increase the value of our agriculture exports is to further build our reputation for being clean and green and yet National want to further industrialise the system with GE and increase the availability of fossil fuel. This is hardly future focussed thinking.

    • @camplord3509
      @camplord3509 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      As someone that has lived in multiple countries around the world, I can tell you that no one knows NZ to be GE free. It has very little economic value.

    • @terryvanderhoeven2148
      @terryvanderhoeven2148 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Your attitude resembles that of the Luddites, as they were called. You are twisting the comments Chris Luxon made to suit your narrative. Genetic Engineering is one of the advancing technologies, as is AGI and FSD, Full Self Driving. As with any advancment, there are potential hazzards, but they can be negotiated. The alternative is to stay safe in your cave while the world moves on. If you want to take that attitude, that's fine, but I do not want to live in a backward, third-world country ignorant of an improving future. The world will continue to evolve for the better. Who seriously believes living in a past era was a better time?

    • @AtCheruti
      @AtCheruti 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, New Zealand needs to go clean and green. Just like Sri Lanka. Also broke and starving. Just like Sri Lanka. First world anti-science people live with their heads in clouds. Scientists are generally supportive of GM. Wannabe scientist pretenders speaking only to look like "deep" thinkers aren't.
      "...GE in agriculture allows for greater use of herbicides and pesticides."
      Wrong except in anti-GM screeds in which reality is suspended anyway.

    • @grandmundi7107
      @grandmundi7107 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'd tell you most people probably don't care that much

    • @gregwaghorn8496
      @gregwaghorn8496 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's part of the WEF PLAYBOOK.
      The foods grown now, are not good for the population.
      Organic foods have more pesticides.
      It's all about DEPOPULATION

  • @jtonline99
    @jtonline99 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

    Jack: what are the risks?
    Luxo: *damnit, where are my cue cards *

    • @Delosian
      @Delosian 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      The absurdity of asking someone to speculate on the dangers of future technologies that haven't been invented yet.

    • @waiskuxx
      @waiskuxx 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Delosian It was a general question though, he wasn't asking specific questions

    • @sunset5927
      @sunset5927 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ⁠exactly. Luxon trying to say there’s no risks - just ridiculous. Just acknowledge there’s some risks & that you’re going to manage them

    • @jtonline99
      @jtonline99 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@Delosian like everything Luxon, he’s taken a position on an issue he doesn’t really understand. He should’ve at least been able to talk through the risks with bringing it in. That’s not speculation, that’s just risk management.

    • @overover..
      @overover.. 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah I will vote for Luxon but he came across awfully here, the question was fair, just answer it

  • @stephenlennon7369
    @stephenlennon7369 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    He was going red when asked about his unproductive housing investment

  • @kingsleytobin2300
    @kingsleytobin2300 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    We need a regulator for him

    • @FRED-gx2qk
      @FRED-gx2qk 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hes a Corporate Conehead

    • @carmenshivas915
      @carmenshivas915 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He's probably already got a handler. Hasn't done him any good though

  • @sunset5927
    @sunset5927 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    Did well?? Luxon didn’t answer 1 question directly!! Jack did well to try to hold him to account!!

    • @pinkybar7328
      @pinkybar7328 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      jack is out of his depth on most subjects,needs to get out more

    • @stevesperry8649
      @stevesperry8649 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      jack wouldnt let him finish answering questions, very impatience

    • @gregspark9845
      @gregspark9845 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nonsense. He didn't give Tame the answers he wanted so he kept badgering him. If you want examples of politicians not answering questions, Ardern was expert, and Hipkins is the same.

    • @lntg
      @lntg 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Chris Hipkins, Chris Luxon and Chloe Swarbrick all avoid answering questions. They’re all equally guilty of it because they’re scared of the consequences of admitting when they’re wrong. Would be nice to see a politician who is actually upfront and honest for once instead of saving face.

  • @ooo-vc4xl
    @ooo-vc4xl 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    That’s the absurdity of not having capital gains. Money goes into the nearest tax free hole bidding up land prices which is totally unproductive use of capital. We don’t have a spending problem we have a tax setting problem

    • @calamitycanyon9173
      @calamitycanyon9173 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      When it comes to taxing assets, I'd prefer a Land Value Tax or Comprehensive Capital Income Tax myself.

    • @yesterday1396
      @yesterday1396 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Exactly ooo!!

    • @stuarttrounson4142
      @stuarttrounson4142 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      0⁰😊😊

    • @terryvanderhoeven2148
      @terryvanderhoeven2148 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      We have a government that is increasing substantially the number of beauracrats as well as paying for consultants while also spending money in the wrong directions.

    • @nikiwaverider6640
      @nikiwaverider6640 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@terryvanderhoeven2148 Who are these bureaucrats you speak of?
      Or are you alarmed that we have more police, teachers, nurses, doctors, surgeons etc?

  • @Aint_Got_The_Answers_Sway
    @Aint_Got_The_Answers_Sway 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    So glad Jack pushed him on the conflict of interest with regards to his properties, people losing it over Michael Wood and a few thousand in Airport shares, but don't think all these MPs who own investment property have a vested interest in keeping the property market humming.

    • @mskoki5712
      @mskoki5712 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yeah, when his shares broke the news, I googled and realised its not millions but 13k shares... Airport shares sell at $10, so that's abt $130k, which is pittance compare to the gains in property

  • @adamcaccioppoli3878
    @adamcaccioppoli3878 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    If added costs to landlords = increased rent, the. why when mortgage interest rates had decreased to record low levels di led rents still go up?

    • @waiskuxx
      @waiskuxx 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Because the National government sold all the land for dirt cheap around 2008-2009 after the financial crisis. Developers and Asians purchased a vast amount of housing which caused us where we are today. At the time it helped dramatically shield us from the worst but it ended up leading us into the bs we are in today.

    • @maaduece5132
      @maaduece5132 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Because labour thought it would be a good idea to not let rental owners claim as many expenses. Alot sold up their portfolio s which increased demand with a lesser supply of stock available

    • @mrspecialk1234
      @mrspecialk1234 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@waiskuxx LOL, it sold all the land dirt cheap to Asians/developers?….Helen Clark signed the FTA with China which opened us up to foreign/Asian pilfering

    • @lntg
      @lntg 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Because of increased rates, more bureaucracy, tax deductibility changes, healthy homes, increased protections for tenants and less protections for landlords, and with the decrease in interest came an increase in house prices?

  • @overover..
    @overover.. 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    "There will be robust risk management". "What are the risks?" .... "There are no risks"
    Chris please make it easier for people to vote for you

  • @theecanmole
    @theecanmole 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    14:20 "Let's look at your policies. You will allow cities to sprawl leading to higher emissions...you will scrap incentives for electric vehicles...you will scrap light rail, you want to let our biggest emitting sector (agriculture) potentially set it's own emissions pricing, you will restart oil and gas exploration. How can anyone take the National Party seriously on climate change?"

    • @southernfriedkiwi7726
      @southernfriedkiwi7726 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Probably because climate change from "man" is a fraud.

    • @growtocycle6992
      @growtocycle6992 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Were you listening?
      More charging stations are needed.. will be funded.
      Genetic engineering needed to improve agricultural efficiency.
      We need to go 100% renewable electricity, but still need oil and gas for some vehicles and industry??
      I agree 100%.. farming sector CANNOT be trusted to send regulate, though. That is the main elephant in the room... NZ has too many cows 🥵

    • @loujackets
      @loujackets 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sun has more effect on climate ‘change’ than any man influenced activities. Thousands of scientists around the world are screaming this but it doesn’t fit the current narrative

  • @TheShikaina
    @TheShikaina 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    It has effected small farmers in India though hasn’t it

    • @reddragon9918
      @reddragon9918 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Do you know why? That’s more of a legislative problem than a problem with the technology

    • @mskoki5712
      @mskoki5712 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Actually it's both technology and legislation, genetic engineering has reduced native species and poor farmers had to rely on big agri companies for buying seeds that can't be pollinated by bees, insemination of cows with foreign jersey bulls actually lead to fewer calves and milk reduction. There is huge reversal of farming back to organic, native and use of mixed crops, reintroducing species and making earth well and healthy again, this is what was how agriculture and animal farming was done 50 yrs back. The only problem is production volume may not be big, but agriculture will be healthy. When we eat healthy, we become healthy, farmers maintain healthy ecosystem

    • @mskoki5712
      @mskoki5712 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@reddragon9918 Actually it's both technology and legislation, genetic engineering has reduced native species and poor farmers had to rely on big agri companies for buying seeds that can't be pollinated by bees, insemination of cows with foreign jersey bulls actually lead to fewer calves and milk reduction. There is huge reversal of farming back to organic, native and use of mixed crops, reintroducing species and making earth well and healthy again, this is what was how agriculture and animal farming was done 50 yrs back. The only problem is production volume may not be big, but agriculture will be healthy. When we eat healthy, we become healthy, farmers maintain healthy ecosystem

    • @ranjitntu
      @ranjitntu 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Its a complex picture in India. The priority is feeding 1.4 billion people and when you have such a huge task at hand, there is bound to be issues. Today, India is self-sufficient when it comes to grains. You have a burgeoning middle class that is ready to pay for its goods. The challenge is for the small farmers to adapt and grow amidst all the chaos. There are huge opportunities when you think about it and I am not ignoring the pitfalls. Farm subsidies, climate change affecting harvests and state vs centre politics around imports are some of the big issues that are not going to go away....

  • @chrismckellar9350
    @chrismckellar9350 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Why isn't National talking about making the the remaining 10-15% of power generation with home generation networks instead of waffling about oil and gas exploration. Jack asked Mr Luxon a direct question and Mr Luxon's answer showed as a property investor he doesn't want to pay tax on his investment. With other questions, an interviewer has the right to ask direct questions.

  • @cameronlabone6050
    @cameronlabone6050 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Makes sense. How come mRNA has different logic applied to it "experimental... unforeseen side-effects" sound familiar?

  • @thechannelofsas8488
    @thechannelofsas8488 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    How is GE going to help our health? Please explain

    • @thesealab8947
      @thesealab8947 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      In principle, any genetic disease could be eliminated, toxic by products from farming, agriculture, manufacturing etc can be metabolised by genetically modified microbes and the list goes on.

  • @feesullivan3439
    @feesullivan3439 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I don’t like the sound of messing with nature.

  • @adsdft585
    @adsdft585 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Will this change pass the Act Party regulations department rules?

  • @yesterday1396
    @yesterday1396 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    What an absolute joke. Can not see why people want him as prime minister.

    • @rogerdewhurst5750
      @rogerdewhurst5750 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They do not. National are gone even facing the worst government in NZ history if they keep Labour-Lite Luxon on board.

    • @stephendickson9000
      @stephendickson9000 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They don't, it's just he's the fool Nat's put in charge and they have been told many times to get rid of him.

  • @adsdft585
    @adsdft585 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    If every house had a solar panel on their roof supplying power to the grid , how would this help supply of power?
    Remembering we need to organize recycling of panels.

    • @rogerdewhurst5750
      @rogerdewhurst5750 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Just about half of a power bill is a fixed charge. Use no power at all and you are still stuck with the fixed charge. The you have to add the amortization of a short life solar panel. Do your sums FIRST.

    • @stormchaser300
      @stormchaser300 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Solar panels last upto 25 years as long as you maintain them. You could run you house entirely on 10,000 watt solar and having 1 2,000 watt wind turbine. So you wont need the grid. i have lived of grid for 12 years my power bill is zero. I even supply excess power to my next door neighbour cheaper than the power company and still make money,

  • @maorifishboy
    @maorifishboy 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Are farming emissions, capital gains taxes, and abortion the top three priorities for Kiwis? As a Father of three young children, my priorities are inflation, housing, and healthcare, which I think is what the majority of us Kiwis are voting on. Government needs to deregulate and roll back taxes just doing those two things, I believe will take down multiple obstacles that us Kiwis face on a daily basis such as how much we pay at the tank, our behavior when going grocery shopping etc.

  • @battleheights
    @battleheights 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I assume Luxton shakes in his boots when it is time to face Tame and always comes out of it with egg on his face.

  • @mikehern2979
    @mikehern2979 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Disappointing interview from Luxon. I think Tame nailed why Luxon is opposed to a CGT. What we need is a land tax on all residential property - tax land value only not improvements. This will encourage speculators and others who own residential land to develop or sell. Also to electrify NZ what about all new builds need solar panels and batteries to store electricity

    • @calamitycanyon9173
      @calamitycanyon9173 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What form of renewable energy we use depends largely on geography and individual situation, and using batteries can cause significant harm to the environment under certain circumstances. Solar is a good option to have but there's not quite a one-size fits all solution. You might want solar here, hydro there, and wind throughout. In places like Australia, India, South Korea, and the US, nuclear is actually quite a sustainable option as well.

    • @michaelstanley8209
      @michaelstanley8209 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I think Tame was a twit. And attacking someone for being successful is the exact problem we have in this country that is sending us backwards. Bring on a Government that has some aspirations and a desire to be successful and to allow us as individuals to be successful

  • @sunset5927
    @sunset5927 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    How can anyone trust Luxon after interviews like this? Even 1-sided Nat supporters should see this situation as it is & question this guy’s honesty & credibility

    • @rogerdewhurst5750
      @rogerdewhurst5750 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      See above

    • @growtocycle6992
      @growtocycle6992 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The fact that he squirmed when asked about capital gains tax actually showed me that he has a conscience and understands the fundamentals... I'm disappointed in the outcome, but it is clearly a non negotiable national policy"dear rat"... I am sorely disappointed about removing the bright line test, though!!!

    • @growtocycle6992
      @growtocycle6992 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I don't own a house and have propped up wealthy landlords by paying off their mortgages for half of my life... Still, Luxon seems better then Hopkins to me, in the big picture view. .

  • @FirstNameLastNameNZ
    @FirstNameLastNameNZ 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    All countries with a CGT, still have wealth distribution issues, the Govt will just spend it. Don''t get drawn into the CGT debate, its a red herring

  • @NZCheekyDarky
    @NZCheekyDarky 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Were not being dangerous but let's start engineering genetics😂😂😂

  • @adsdft585
    @adsdft585 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If there is increased productivity what % decrease happens to prices of milk,fruit,meat and eggs fall?

  • @adsdft585
    @adsdft585 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Productive! Have income gains been passed on to employees at a reasonable rate?

    • @reddragon9918
      @reddragon9918 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      What income gains?

  • @peterwakemanfreespeech
    @peterwakemanfreespeech 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    time for the departure lounge Chris but which one?

  • @JohanThiart
    @JohanThiart 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Jack stop being the news. What about a conservative bio approach do you not understand?

    • @JohanThiart
      @JohanThiart 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Jack is so smart. 😂 I will every day of the week rely on Jack’s understanding of science….. Yeah, right. Maybe, Luxon should offer him the job of the bio regulator.

    • @stewatparkpark2933
      @stewatparkpark2933 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Jack is an immature " points scorer " .

  • @maxwellbarrett
    @maxwellbarrett 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Doesn't national act like they know how to manage money? Meanwhile their leader can't keep track of his own property investment details... funny that. Jack pushed pretty hard though i might have suggested he dial it back half a knotch, just half :P

    • @Steve-bi2ic
      @Steve-bi2ic 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Pretty ironic to point to Woods as incompetent for not keeping track of his airport shares (which he clearly did not handle well). Then for Luxon with a straight face go on national television and say he doesn’t keep track of his investments.

  • @maryallan8103
    @maryallan8103 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    No. Bad news. GMO.

  • @questor55
    @questor55 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    That first question about the risks. It was funny to me that Chris talked about getting stuck in a time warp, then found himself in an endless loop which Jack was doggedly trying to get them to escape from. Chris showing John Key levels of oily slipperiness there.

    • @sunset5927
      @sunset5927 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Exactly!! I actually support the Nats policy on GE - time for NZ to get with the picture. However, Luxon did such a poor job of explaining & selling the policy

    • @alethein359
      @alethein359 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Yeah that was wild. "I think the risks can be mitigated." "I don't see any risks." "Yes there are risks". Which is it Luxon?

  • @frodo261
    @frodo261 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I bet Luxo has never read a book on the problems with GM technology…he is a smart businessman, but pretty clueless…has he ever heard of Monsanto .Seems to be terrified we are behind the times with gm ...we actually have have an advantage being gm free

  • @adsdft585
    @adsdft585 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Our products are natural!

  • @regansum1293
    @regansum1293 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    Very scary if he becomes prime minister. What an eye opening interview.
    Jack is the new Paul Holmes

    • @tommym6515
      @tommym6515 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Most if not all National’s policies are based on the poor outcomes of this Labour government. We’ve gone downhill pretty quickly under Labour, a righting in the ship is definitely required.

    • @rogerdewhurst5750
      @rogerdewhurst5750 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      First statement OK. Second statement BALLS.

    • @dontcomply3976
      @dontcomply3976 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Tame is a fucking disgrace

    • @jame2433
      @jame2433 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Matthew-zv8qe exactly. Not to mention the state of things after 9 years of national that labour had to deal with, while dealing with a pandemic.

  • @ApeXTechno
    @ApeXTechno 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    No Chris, you can't have it both ways and expect to be taken seriously by a critically thinking person. You can't on the one hand say "I'm not the scientist, I'm the politician". Then on the other hand say "It (genetically modifying organisms in NZ) will be incrediby well managed". That makes no sense.

    • @maxwellbarrett
      @maxwellbarrett 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And politicians are supposed to be informed by their scientists on the science so that they can actually make the decisions! So ridiculous

    • @gregspark9845
      @gregspark9845 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Tame was badgering him looking for a gotcha moment, by quoting an example he found on Google. Luxon can't be expected to know every technical detail. That's for experts to assess.

    • @ApeXTechno
      @ApeXTechno 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Oh jeeze. Luxon desreves to be 'badgered' by a journalist who's role is to keep him transparent as he avoids questions over and over.

  • @JG-us9lu
    @JG-us9lu 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The biggest risk is that they copyright everything they create and own all your food. Seeds are a good example. There are no useful seeds in fruit that has been GM'd so you have buy more seed the following year.

  • @nickseaton6920
    @nickseaton6920 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    All Humpty can talk about is NZ meeting its climate change adjectives

  • @ala-hc4rx
    @ala-hc4rx 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    D
    our former minister of finance under helen clarke owned 27 rental propertys.hippocrosy by tame .

    • @nikiwaverider6640
      @nikiwaverider6640 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Where did you hear that?

    • @reddragon9918
      @reddragon9918 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      And given there was no scandal over it - they probably did a great job managing those properties, providing affordable housing for their tenants, and maintaining personal relationships with them.
      Managing investment properties is no walk in the park. I could write a thesis on why.

    • @dontcomply3976
      @dontcomply3976 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      How many does Tame own?

    • @nikiwaverider6640
      @nikiwaverider6640 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@dontcomply3976 Tame isn't running for PM.

    • @dontcomply3976
      @dontcomply3976 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @Niki Waverider So?
      The media is scum, they hound interviewees over something they would quite happily if they could afford to.

  • @adsdft585
    @adsdft585 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    People should listen to Garys Economics about the debt based economy and housing ownership.

  • @R.T_Go_Your_Own_Way
    @R.T_Go_Your_Own_Way 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Luxon has to go if Nats want to have a chance. At this point it doesn't matter if he was talking about feeding the homeless, he looks like a politician, be sounds like a politician, he doesn't give strait answers like a politician, everything is delivered with a spin like a politician. They don't get we are sick of politicians. I want someone who will stop the games and get on with the job, not another bloody politician.

    • @fe6767
      @fe6767 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      What is "the job"?
      Most definitely don't want someone who silently "get on with the job" and wouldn't tell us what they were up to. The silent dictator would be a recipe for disaster.

    • @Steve-bi2ic
      @Steve-bi2ic 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@fe6767 what risks for GMO’s is Luxon aware of? What factors did he balance in his decision? I’m still unclear.
      Why is his potential benefit of keeping no CGT of hundreds of thousands of dollars not a conflict of interest, but Woods few thousands is? The best I heard was because no one has told him it is.
      I really don’t hear many answers. But a lot of taking.
      He even had to be asked twice how much tax he would pay on it currently. While being “transparent, upfront”. That’s not being upfront.
      I agree silence would be worse, but this performance isn’t much better.

    • @fe6767
      @fe6767 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Steve-bi2ic I am glad you agree with me. Luxton's policies and interview performance are bad but silence and secretive rulers would be worse.

  • @optimumperformance
    @optimumperformance 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ban “roundup” and 1080

    • @CUZZABRO
      @CUZZABRO 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Lot of moronic comments from you in this thread

  • @jamesvoss3482
    @jamesvoss3482 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Watching from Australia this interviewer is excellent!!!

  • @Dlweta57
    @Dlweta57 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You forgot to mention geothermal and hydro luxon when talking bout renuables

  • @KaczorFitzhenry
    @KaczorFitzhenry 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Jack has to learn not to interrupt his guests.

  • @TheMornebrink
    @TheMornebrink 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    NZ is about 10 years behind in Tech

  • @dontcomply3976
    @dontcomply3976 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I dont why Luxon bothered to talk to that little creep Tame

  • @adsdft585
    @adsdft585 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    People need to recall that our tax system is aimed to tax salary and wages earners. These people don't get deduction for cost of going to work. However business do?

    • @rogerdewhurst5750
      @rogerdewhurst5750 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Certainly the cost of going to work should be a legitimate deduction.

    • @thecurrentmoment
      @thecurrentmoment 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Income and consumption is taxed, and the aim is to only tax it once, which is why businesses can deduct their expenses, because their expenses is someone else's income. It only gets taxed on the income end

  • @barneyboy2008
    @barneyboy2008 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Well done Jack. Luxon was squirming over those houses. Really, does someone need to own 7 houses. Watch out Jack or he'll send Sam Uffindell round to sought you out.

  • @johanpotgieter4318
    @johanpotgieter4318 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Follow the science. Where did I hear that BS before.

  • @mixmastermootree
    @mixmastermootree 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    why did luxton keep calling him jake?

  • @heatherburton8756
    @heatherburton8756 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Typical Jack Tame talks over whoever he interviews

  • @DW_Kiwi
    @DW_Kiwi 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can he not get into his head that Co governance is the elephant in the room!!

  • @ooo-vc4xl
    @ooo-vc4xl 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Jack eats Chris alive

    • @sunset5927
      @sunset5927 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Agree 100%. Luxon dodged every single question. Not 1 straight answer

  • @optimumperformance
    @optimumperformance 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Very aggressive interview style Vs how he interviewed Chris

    • @CUZZABRO
      @CUZZABRO 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Maybe if Luxon wasn't so full of it

    • @optimumperformance
      @optimumperformance 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@CUZZABRO did you listen to Chris. All of them are full of it.

  • @mskoki5712
    @mskoki5712 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I'm only voting for a party that will introduce a threshold for tax free income before taxing. The kiwisaver shld be tax free savings for retirement be allowed dividends. Every single dollar is being taxed here, but the wealthy has more option to pay less tax. We pay gst on food, goods and services. even Asian countries have a threshold of tax free income of $18k before taxing.
    Luxon is sounds and talks like politician... They Only have vested interest in protecting their own.

  • @fatherted2260
    @fatherted2260 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Gosh, all these liebour supporters following luxon. Heartwarming🙃

    • @loujackets
      @loujackets 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Uniparty

  • @amosonyoutube
    @amosonyoutube 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Im all for gmo. Just keep it contain so it does’nt effect other crops.

  • @mikewilliams6086
    @mikewilliams6086 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We trust the science from our autcrate government! 😂😂😂. No risks! Trust us!

  • @storyhori
    @storyhori 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    WEF puppet,

  • @HN-in7zz
    @HN-in7zz 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How is this guy going to win fml, we turning into America 🥲

  • @therealdrbyte
    @therealdrbyte 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Vote nz loyal

  • @dalem6597
    @dalem6597 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    This is your best interview yet Jack!! Well done

    • @sunset5927
      @sunset5927 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Agree!! Can’t wait to see Luxon vs Chippy in the election debates!!

    • @mrspecialk1234
      @mrspecialk1234 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Funny how we’ve never seen young Jack go this hard on anyone in government….he’s biased and it shows

    • @philip88154
      @philip88154 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@mrspecialk1234 I've seen him be pretty rough with Hiptkins and Shaw. I don't think he is biased

    • @darrellsimpson6966
      @darrellsimpson6966 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This is your worst interview yet Jerk.

  • @luckyM9963
    @luckyM9963 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Jack, i think you should go an live in Venezuela. You will be reformed over there..

  • @Homemade1772
    @Homemade1772 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Jack you need to interview Michael Wood the same way you're interviewing Chris Luxon. And one needs to question the PM who gave 6 years and walks away a multimillionaire rather than a PM who already has done business and made honest $$$

  • @gringapolska
    @gringapolska 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That’s all I need to know about HIM

  • @georgeminty6218
    @georgeminty6218 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Batting for BAYER Luxon.

  • @tweir1609
    @tweir1609 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dah what are the risks

  • @sagarluu1843
    @sagarluu1843 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Blatant denial and short-sighted-ness of G.E Risks.
    Goodbye small scale farming and organic agriculture.

  • @ruihmartins
    @ruihmartins 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Jack, may I suggest you listen and park your personal biases at the door.

    • @yahmom626
      @yahmom626 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Cry about it, Luxon is full of hot air

  • @JamesSumner-Goodwin
    @JamesSumner-Goodwin หลายเดือนก่อน

    He performed underwhelmingly, score: 4/10.
    He's learned the evasive trick but still not quite pulling it off, what a difference a few months makes though.

  • @adsdft585
    @adsdft585 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I think many interviewers must have lots of knowledge given research they do.

    • @rogerdewhurst5750
      @rogerdewhurst5750 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They ought to but Tame is pretty clueless, barely able to tell the difference between the sun and the moon.

    • @nikiwaverider6640
      @nikiwaverider6640 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@rogerdewhurst5750 what a load of rubbish.

  • @pruaporo
    @pruaporo 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yeah right look at the condition of the Lands now. The ground is poisonous

  • @kingsleytobin2300
    @kingsleytobin2300 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    A new regulator won’t stop genetic mutation.
    Tell Homer Simpson to address the risks and stop living in ignorance.

  • @stormchaser300
    @stormchaser300 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    To many people with to many houses there should be a limit on houses you own i would say 2.

  • @funkiwikid6106
    @funkiwikid6106 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hey Jack, how about asking lux liquid if he is interested in listening to and serving New Zealanders? Or is he hell bent on ignoring Kiwis and following jacinda's roll model as a dictator ? That's a basic simple question to ask of all politicians now they seem to think they're god.

  • @gavinmcarthur3676
    @gavinmcarthur3676 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    another WEF stooge

    • @dontcomply3976
      @dontcomply3976 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes, Tame is

    • @gavinmcarthur3676
      @gavinmcarthur3676 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@dontcomply3976 i was referring to Luxton, but you knew that

    • @dontcomply3976
      @dontcomply3976 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @gavin mcarthur Well both really
      I guess the difference is that Tame is true believer and Luxon is just a pussy, as demonstrated by this Maoist struggle session.

  • @gregwaghorn8496
    @gregwaghorn8496 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    NZ has NO industry left

  • @janewallace880
    @janewallace880 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Wow, Jack. I was impressed. You were like a dog with a bone but not a growly, aggressive one like Sean Plunkett on the Platform interviewing Leighton Baker.

    • @mrspecialk1234
      @mrspecialk1234 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yep, but young Jack loves to hump the leg of Lab/green interviewees

  • @rtjahyadi7868
    @rtjahyadi7868 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Why the fact he has 7 properties and wanna remove the bright line become an issue only aimed on him?? a lot other house owners wanna see the bright line scrap as well, Jack was rude!

  • @thejokert8
    @thejokert8 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Not everything’s black and white Jack

  • @CHewittMedia
    @CHewittMedia 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm not one for Labour but let's not be naive - This guy is as corporate as it gets and when he talks about genetic engineering he's thinking profits and reward, not health. Polar extremes aren't the answer and having an ex CEO as PM, they are going to be just as anti "for the people" as having a vapid ex fish n chip worker like Ardern.
    I think NZ never recovered from the 80's and 90's Uniparty takeover, and with so much of our country's culture hijacked from overseas, so much of our national identity diluted by globalism, this country just doesn't know what it wants to be anymore, let alone know what it is.

  • @colinboggust2950
    @colinboggust2950 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What are the risks. No worries money to be made

  • @Straitjacket-Fits
    @Straitjacket-Fits 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    resistence will be irrelevant

  • @vivekverma4689
    @vivekverma4689 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sure I like thus

  • @noedelman
    @noedelman 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Legalising GMO is probably the only sensible idea, shame he is the worst person to make a case for it

  • @user-ks3tz4fi2d
    @user-ks3tz4fi2d 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Organic is not the same GMO free ..

  • @markkunath8440
    @markkunath8440 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Great interview Jack. A man who lives in 3 houses wants to make policy about housing....

  • @markmesarich-oo1mn
    @markmesarich-oo1mn 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Jack Tame looks like he has an agenda for his interview rather than listening .
    Very disappointing

  • @boazapoa8469
    @boazapoa8469 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Capital Gains is funny watch until the endc😂

  • @thomasfoot3023
    @thomasfoot3023 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    David Lange would have loved to see it. Lex Luthor taken to task

  • @boazapoa8469
    @boazapoa8469 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We Should follow BRICS forget NATO

  • @ronniethompson7464
    @ronniethompson7464 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sovle problems to make problems

  • @saxdearing3395
    @saxdearing3395 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Tame likes the sound of his own voice.

    • @rogerdewhurst5750
      @rogerdewhurst5750 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That is fairly obvious.

    • @bevanfidler6809
      @bevanfidler6809 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well we would have heard a lot less of Jack's voice if Luxon had been able to give straight answers to the questions that Jack kept having to repeat...

  • @jessestevens_aka_jesus
    @jessestevens_aka_jesus 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Typical CEO. Not used to being challenged and thinks repeating bland assurances is good enough to placate the plebs.