The Bretton Woods System (HOM 35-A)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 31 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 36

  • @ProfessorBarth
    @ProfessorBarth  4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Follow me on Twitter:
    twitter.com/Professor_Barth
    If you enjoy this channel and want to support:
    www.patreon.com/professorbarth
    Buy my book:
    www.amazon.com/Currency-Empire-Seventeenth-Century-English-America-ebook/dp/B08L6ZPV19/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=currency+of+empire&sr=8-1
    History of Money playlist:
    th-cam.com/play/PLinliDgP9EbScxfH5wxoX8I_HNRSElqZ_.html
    Foundations of Western Political Thought playlist:
    th-cam.com/play/PLinliDgP9EbRu4qZn8SJFgysSQB5I4c-L.html

  • @lukasbaral5108
    @lukasbaral5108 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    THE best bretton woods video out there, I finally understand what its all about.

  • @juliust.5650
    @juliust.5650 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you for these videos. You've been answering many questions about our financial systems, and their history, that I've had without going too far into the weeds. You've summarized things very well and made it a lot easier to understand without having to wade through tomes of information.

  • @mikekimikekimike
    @mikekimikekimike 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    5:30 20 000 tonnes = 44 million pounds.
    Thanks for a great lecture!

    • @Pr0tOtyPE005
      @Pr0tOtyPE005 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I agree great lecture as usual, but I was also wondering about that conversion. I had carried more on my truck lol

  • @adambased7928
    @adambased7928 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Excellent content .well done

  • @DKPSKs
    @DKPSKs 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Tremendous. I'm watching all of your lectures, hope it's ok if I reach out to you with questions or observations I may have.

  • @James-xu3vc
    @James-xu3vc 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I think that Mike Maloney would applaud your efforts.
    ❤❤❤

  • @billmitchell2080
    @billmitchell2080 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I would suggest interested readers, find Arthur Schlesinger's trilogy on FDR and the New Deal. Dismissing the New Deal in this manner has factional intent.

  • @Pichouette
    @Pichouette 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Does anyone believe that Ft Knox still has all that gold?
    When was the last time an inventory was conducted?

  • @welchkoservices4200
    @welchkoservices4200 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You've certainly found the rabbit hole.
    Now, you're off to see the wizard.
    The not so wonderful wizard of
    Oz.
    That's ounces.
    Frank Baum, back in the day tried to tell us, but somehow dorothy's shoes, turned from silver, to ruby....
    One, really is a pet rock.

  • @NICOLONDOTO
    @NICOLONDOTO 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hello, where can I see the bibliography?

    • @ProfessorBarth
      @ProfessorBarth  3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Sources: "Creation of the Bretton Woods System" by Federal Reserve History (a research arm of the Fed); "The Ascent of Money: A Financial History of the World" by Niall Ferguson; "Exorbitant Privilege: The Rise and Fall of the Dollar" by Barry Eichengreen; "A History of Money and Banking in the United States" by Murray Rothbard; and "All The Presidents' Bankers: The Hidden Alliances That Drive American Power" by Nomi Prins.

  • @АнтонБугаев-б9ъ
    @АнтонБугаев-б9ъ ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you please elaborate more on why dollar would cost more than gold between 1944 and 1960s?
    (you mention it as a reason why national central banks would not try to exchange dollar for gold before the 1960s)

    • @ProfessorBarth
      @ProfessorBarth  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      In the late 1940s there was a severe dollar shortage -- the dollar was so hard, that in reality, it was worth more than gold at the fixed price of $35 an ounce. People and businesses that dealt overseas desperately wanted dollars; it was the world reserve currency and there was a shortage of them overseas. One of the reasons behind the Marshall Plan was to introduce more dollars overseas. By the late 1950s there was a dollar glut and the opposite problem occurred, though immense pressure was placed on foreign central banks throughout the 1960s to not demand redemption.

  • @carletonchristensen9971
    @carletonchristensen9971 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I take it that by "allies" you mean only the Western allies. The Soviet Union outproduced the US in, e.g., armoured vehicles.

  • @gigante87
    @gigante87 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    While your neoclassical/austrian/monetarism "free market" gave you the great delression, the new deal took unemployment from 25% to 10% before the outbreak of ww2

    • @ProfessorBarth
      @ProfessorBarth  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Unemployment at the beginning of 1931 (1.5 years after the stock market crash) was 12%. I explained in my Hoover lecture why I believe the depression deepened later in 1931 and 1932, and that it was directly tied to intervention. The unemployment rate returned to the 12% level in the first half of 1937, four years into the New Deal. Then unemployment shot back up to 20%, and then hovered around 16% until the outbreak of World War 2, and remained at that level through the summer of 1940,. While the U.S. did not enter the war until Dec. 1941, the U.S. had already begun to mobilize for war in 1940, with a fivefold increase in defense spending. By that point the U.S. had already started its cash and carry with Britain, including the sale of armaments, and then Congress enacted Lend-Lease early in 1941. While economists differ sharply on the causes of the Great Depression - on issues ranging from the cause of the initial crash to the cause of its long extent - there is universal consensus among economic historians that the economy did not turn around until the outbreak of World War 2. That is indisputable.

  • @mikeballard8404
    @mikeballard8404 ปีที่แล้ว

    Interesting, as we watch the Central banks moving us closer to a global banking center, no longer banks with national interests.

  • @SandhillCrane42
    @SandhillCrane42 ปีที่แล้ว

    Here's the real job crusher, not the bathroom politics of sensationalism. CFR? Think Tank=$$$

  • @Mahdah1955
    @Mahdah1955 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very good topics, but unfortunately the explanation is very boring.

    • @bradatherton9369
      @bradatherton9369 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Are you expecting a delivery more on par with something from The History Channel? WTF, it's a free service. Quicherbichin.

    • @connoravila5332
      @connoravila5332 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Completely disagree. This is a great presentation

    • @Roylamx
      @Roylamx 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Simply adjust play back to 1.5 or more if you can keep up.

  • @TonyMyerson
    @TonyMyerson 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    🤙❤️😇😎🌺🤙❤️😇😎🌺 0:53