The HS2 Canal. The Story of The Grand Contour Canal.

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 ต.ค. 2024
  • In this weeks explore we discuss JF Pownall's rather curious plan to link the entire UK Canal netowrk.... with one Canal.... in 1942. Join us as we tell the curious tale.
    #HS2 #canal
    Credits:
    Massive thanks to Matt (Twitter: @iamcanalboy ) for inspiration and thumbnail!
    Pictures: All highlighted within
    Music: Artlist and Epidemicsound
    Join this channel to get access to perks:
    / @pwhitewick
    If you are interested in ways in which you can help support the channel please do consider clicking on any of the links below or alternatively the join button on here.
    / everydisusedstation
    www.paulwhitewi...
    ko-fi.com/ever...
    PayPal: whitewickpaul@gmail.com

ความคิดเห็น • 234

  • @roytindle
    @roytindle 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Proud to have been a member of the team, based at AECOM. Disappointed that the UK Government lacked to vision to see the many advantages that such a canal would produce: water to a water scarce area, the South East, water cooled conduit for HVDC power lines, a similar additional Internet backbone, freight for non-perishable goods, in bulk, and a significant tourist attraction.

    • @pwhitewick
      @pwhitewick  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Wonderful, thanks Roy. I enjoyed reading the report a lot. Wish i had time to include more of the concept in the video.

  • @andrewmarch7891
    @andrewmarch7891 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Very interesting, missed your missus though, Rebecca brightens up each video she appears in.

  • @ggm02
    @ggm02 2 ปีที่แล้ว +48

    7:19 - I see you were lucky to capture the extremely rare event of the canal water flowing uphill through the locks.
    Thoroughly entertaining video as usual, great stuff.

    • @bullettube9863
      @bullettube9863 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Is that what the ponds were used for? I thought looking at them that they could supply water for boats going in both directions. Simply genius engineering!

    • @pwhitewick
      @pwhitewick  2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Haha.. I think I need to pop one of these in every video just to keep you all on the ball! Well played!

    • @2H80vids
      @2H80vids 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Well spotted indeed. I could have watched that many, many times and I'd never have noticed. I knew that worked in Australia but never seen it here before.😁

  • @malcolmsmith6615
    @malcolmsmith6615 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    It would have been doable back in 1942, things just seemed to happen once (if) they had the support of the war office. Today? It would take 50 years of planning, objections, and public enquiries, as everyone would support it except for the short bit that would go past the end of their own road.
    An excellent informative video that reveals a lot of unanswered questions about the lifts.

    • @hairyairey
      @hairyairey 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I live in Peterborough and used to live in an estate that was designed during WWII and completed in 1946. The war didn't stop everything.

  • @bobsrailrelics
    @bobsrailrelics 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Just watched this a second time as there is so much to take in. What could have been, especially having constant freight. And a series of chasm lifts would have been an amazing site. Thanks for this 👍

    • @pwhitewick
      @pwhitewick  2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Thanks Bob. Very kind.

    • @davidh4514
      @davidh4514 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Caisson lifts.

  • @mrhis2ry
    @mrhis2ry 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Fascinating concept and history

  • @ilox11
    @ilox11 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What an amazing concept, a shipping canal to bring the major cities of the UK together, big enough for Coastal shipping to use and no locks, just lifts. Wow.
    That is really thinking outside of the box! Thank you for such an interesting exposition of Powell's idea.
    If only...

  • @phillunn4691
    @phillunn4691 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Thanks for another interesting video of the great canal network that is a big part of our life history. Look forward to seeing next week’s video. Thanks Paul and Rebecca 👍🏼👍🏼

  • @deanehammitt7604
    @deanehammitt7604 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I really enjoyed this one. I love your thirst for history.

    • @pwhitewick
      @pwhitewick  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you Deane.

  • @webchimp
    @webchimp 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I remember that water project, lots of grumbling about the south stealing the north's water.

    • @pwhitewick
      @pwhitewick  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I can imagine.

  • @chiaratiara2575
    @chiaratiara2575 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Saner must have done a huge amount of research. Really impressive. Great video too (Rebecca behind the camera and Paul). The idea of running major electricity lines underwater is so fanatastically simple (after they are armoured of course, which is not cheap) one would expect it to save some major lines coming down in storms - except they would have to have risen again to supply each house. I think dredging would have been a problem, too, and repairs.

    • @hairyairey
      @hairyairey 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I would presume the cables would run in ducts under or alongside the canal. Because repairing them would be an issue and armoured cable underground is practical over short distances only.

  • @stuarthall6631
    @stuarthall6631 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Fascinating! Thank you, Paul. Although having had, in the past, a long connection with the inland waterways and having lived upon a narrowboat for eight years, I have never before heard of this scheme!

    • @pwhitewick
      @pwhitewick  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It was new to me until very recently

  • @brettpalfrey4665
    @brettpalfrey4665 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    hmmmm...suddenly, HS2 doesnt seem so crazy after all!

  • @RobertSmith-zv1xo
    @RobertSmith-zv1xo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It's amazing how you come up with these subjects and then to make a good vlog about them! Thank you mr.Whitewick.

    • @pwhitewick
      @pwhitewick  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Very kind. Thanks

  • @MichaelTavares
    @MichaelTavares 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    A few Falkirk wheels about the place should sort out the lift level issues!

  • @soundhobo
    @soundhobo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Fascinating stuff…makes you think how things could have been 🤔…👍

  • @radiosnail
    @radiosnail 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    extremely interesting. Never heard of this before.

  • @Leonard_Smith
    @Leonard_Smith 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    One canal to rule them all...
    Nice video.

  • @pauljones1350
    @pauljones1350 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Was nice to see you on a lively canal for a change,wow still in use what amazing designs built to last they might need to bring these back in more places

  • @davie941
    @davie941 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    hi again paul and rebecca , yet another great cool interesting video , well done and thank you so much guys 😊

  • @johnathanrowley2707
    @johnathanrowley2707 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is better than a TV documentary, really intresting especially history of uk canals and railways

    • @pwhitewick
      @pwhitewick  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks Johnathan. Very kind.

  • @bullettube9863
    @bullettube9863 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    The idea that England's canals could be used to both supply water for agriculture and for flood control is an idea that really needs to be explored with today's changing climate!

    • @murray5629
      @murray5629 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Check the Glasgow Smart Canal! :)

    • @bullettube9863
      @bullettube9863 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@murray5629 Well you know the old saying about the Scots! (and the Irish) "We just know better, sooner!"

  • @peterrose561
    @peterrose561 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Another great video your love for history is remarkable 👍

  • @greghilton7797
    @greghilton7797 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    What a great video. You've got thoughts in my mind going in all sorts of directions.

  • @ahooper99
    @ahooper99 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Beautiful shots of Caen Hill locks! :-)

  • @owlhead7594
    @owlhead7594 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Paul and rebecca enjoy your show very much.informative and historical. I'm from bedford nh usa. Keep it going God bless.

  • @chrissayers7076
    @chrissayers7076 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Interesting documentary, thanks to Paul, and to whoever was wangling the camera.

  • @NonstopEurotrip
    @NonstopEurotrip 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Absolutely fascinating, I love cancel stuff and your videos are always so well made and interesting. Great job! 😊🙏🏻

  • @drdoolittle5724
    @drdoolittle5724 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Can you imagine better wartime targets for the Nazi's? You Two are setting yourself up for a C4 series of your own, that's some of the best television, sorry TH-cam, Iv'e enjoyed for a long term - scrap the day jobs!!!

    • @pwhitewick
      @pwhitewick  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks Dr. That's a really good point. You'd definitely presume that fear of what if would be prohibitive immediately after the war

  • @thomasdieckmann5711
    @thomasdieckmann5711 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Very interesting, Paul. Thanks for the research on this concept. I wonder how the practical handover points would have looked like, to the lower levels and old smaller canal system, with 300 ft lifts. Maybe this stopped that idea to come true.

    • @pwhitewick
      @pwhitewick  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Indeed, I guess there would have been three set desogns for the varying height. But as for the designs themselves, thats something I would love to have seen!

  • @EngineerLewis
    @EngineerLewis 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks Paul and Rebecca - As an engineer I am amazed at the concepts you discuss regarding infrastructure development from the past. Maybe offshore wind farms will be viewed differently in 50 years time! Looking forward to your next videos!

  • @Hairnicks
    @Hairnicks 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Brilliant as usual Paul, a fascinating insight into something I never knew anything about.

  • @robertwedd1111
    @robertwedd1111 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Facinating - Thanks for another great video 👍

  • @sam_uelson
    @sam_uelson 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I've never been to any of these places but I love this channel

  • @hairyairey
    @hairyairey 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    One of your best ever videos Paul. Did you know that 0.5% of electricity in the UK is used simply to move water? Also one thing canals have going for them is resilience (except when they freeze over!). Because so many manufacturers rely on just in time deliveries any interruption to the supply chain (eg bad weather) will impact production. Whereas the canals would act as a natural buffer to any delays. Obviously that would mean a lot of expensive cargo on the waterways but is that any different to ships queuing to discharge cargo? What we need is an Eddie Stobart of canals! Surprised it isn't the one field they have diversified into but as you say we would need to connect so many canals up.

  • @stuartbridger5177
    @stuartbridger5177 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very interesting video. thanks for sharing your knowledge. Great piece of research

  • @mc2594
    @mc2594 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    fascinating video and great film work .. @2:43 surprising how attractive the mix of modern architecture in a natural landscape can be, if HS2 can achieve that sort of balance it'll help, also shows how antiquated and undeveloped most of the canal system is in comparison.

  • @neilthehermit4655
    @neilthehermit4655 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    What a great idea. - In terms of lower impact on the enviroment than more and more roads,and a sensible way to move to a more eco-friendly system in general. - In conbination with better and more plentiful public transport this might encourage a reduction in cars and trucks in our country. - Also the creation of this would be a great way to create jobs and stimulate the economy....so of course it won't happen.

  • @paulwhitehouse3690
    @paulwhitehouse3690 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    a wonderful presentation, it puts a lot into a very different perspective - a 90 metre contour line, an amazing artery through the country. Paul, Johannesburg

  • @davependrill2897
    @davependrill2897 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Absolutely brilliant video.

  • @ReubenAshwell
    @ReubenAshwell 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This video is fascinating as with your other videos. :)

  • @CourtAboveTheCut
    @CourtAboveTheCut ปีที่แล้ว

    After talking about this the other day I finally watched your video. The Cotswolds are trying to take advantage of this idea with the water transfer

  • @Drivershell53
    @Drivershell53 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    great video, fascinating story, boy was it muddy though!

  • @craigs1266
    @craigs1266 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you for your content 🙂

    • @pwhitewick
      @pwhitewick  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Always a pleasure

  • @lindamccaughey6669
    @lindamccaughey6669 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video thanks Paul. Love canals some of the engineering is fantastic . Thanks for taking me along. Please stay safe and take care

  • @paulinehedges5088
    @paulinehedges5088 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What fascinating video. Thanks Paul. Keep them coming as they are always interesting and crammed full of facts.
    Happy New Year

    • @pwhitewick
      @pwhitewick  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks Pauline, and to you.

  • @midlam99
    @midlam99 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Absolutely stunning production Paul, content very interesting too, thanks.

  • @martinjolly8351
    @martinjolly8351 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Fascinating, never heard of this before. This video has some of your best edits - great use of drone shots illustrating your words. Better every time!

  • @nickcaunt1769
    @nickcaunt1769 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very thought provoking. I was aware of this already, but in title only, so a very good and helpful appraisal of the key issues.
    Rather surprisingly I had an hour long debate with myself on a long car journey yesterday about whether the canal engineers had contour maps when they planned their routes. This started as I crossed the Manchester Ship Canal high up on the M6 with a long view of the Cheshire plain and hills. I concluded they didn't because of how their designs basically went uphill and down again and newer canals just tagged on rather than integrated. But that could have been a cash availability issue rather than the ability to plan on a bigger scale.

  • @shirleylynch7529
    @shirleylynch7529 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fascinating story. You would make a great lecturer. So enthusiastic and informative to listen to. Thank you. (Maybe you are a lecturer). Most enjoyable and great filming.thank you.

    • @pwhitewick
      @pwhitewick  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you Shirley, very kind.

  • @andrewpreston4127
    @andrewpreston4127 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I visited the Crofton pumping station many years ago. Amazing feeling being so up close to a working beam engine.
    Nothing to do with canals, but that russet top of yours looks really good. May I ask who makes it ?

    • @andrewfanner2245
      @andrewfanner2245 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      That pumping station has one of the original engines that were fitted when it was built. Although not in regular use it still works and still does the job it was designed and built to do. Not many modern mach9ines that will be able to boast that in 200 or so years!

  • @GEHDunedin
    @GEHDunedin 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ok, so we're now waiting for your video on lifts, finishing/focusing on the stunning Falkirk Wheel!

  • @edenviews
    @edenviews 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This was a full-on informative video!! 😁We had someone wanting to dig a canal the length of the Roman Wall from Carlisle to Newcastle a number of years ago- seemed like madness!

  • @DavidBeddard
    @DavidBeddard 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Top notch. Fascinating! 👌

  • @stephensaines7100
    @stephensaines7100 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The quality of your vids has increased geometrically. Exceptionally good!

  • @gaugeonesteam
    @gaugeonesteam 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great Video - Best one for a while although they're all good.

    • @pwhitewick
      @pwhitewick  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks Robin 👍

  • @dashcamexplorationuk1692
    @dashcamexplorationuk1692 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Interesting as always

  • @MrLargePig
    @MrLargePig 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    An interesting idea. I think, when all is said and done, that Pownall just loved canals, and wanted more.

  • @cyrildhy8993
    @cyrildhy8993 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Watching with TH-cam subtitles switched on . Interesting

  • @ianjenkinson3585
    @ianjenkinson3585 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great, I missed this video when it came out. I sat on one of the Panels that considered the AECOM proposal in 2011. A great idea but, unfortunately still a lot of work required to bring it to fruition.

  • @HenrysAdventures
    @HenrysAdventures 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Interesting concept! If such a canal was built today I wonder if it would face the same opposition as HS2?

  • @paulwayman4579
    @paulwayman4579 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great video what this channel does best 😃

  • @WelshMullet
    @WelshMullet 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Wonder if it would have been easy in the aftermath of the war with the need for a job program and surely lots of leftover explosives to use for construction... maybe the UKs version of Project Plowshare?!

  • @davidsheriff8989
    @davidsheriff8989 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    As always, your videos are entertaining and so factual....part of our history that needs keeping...

  • @stuwilsonrallying
    @stuwilsonrallying 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fantastic well produced informative and educational vlog
    Keep up the fantastic work

    • @pwhitewick
      @pwhitewick  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad you enjoyed it

  • @simonbradshaw3708
    @simonbradshaw3708 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for another interesting video, it must take you sometime to research all of this information.

    • @pwhitewick
      @pwhitewick  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Indeed it does. Thank you.

  • @northernblue1093
    @northernblue1093 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Interesting and well-produced, as always.

    • @pwhitewick
      @pwhitewick  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you kindly!

  • @Jimyjames73
    @Jimyjames73 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    WOW - that would of been amazing 😮🚂🚂🚂

  • @peterw2845
    @peterw2845 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Like the old days , great video 👍

  • @colinlothlorian
    @colinlothlorian 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent. Actually Colonel Saner, pronounced as in sane. He also designed the pontoon supported swing bridges across the River Weaver navigation in Northwich, Cheshire. Also worth looking at the Weaver Wolverhampton waterway, a WW2 scheme to make the River Weaver navigable through Nantwich to the foot of the Audlem flight on the Shropshire Union Canal. Lifts would have replaced the flights of locks on the Shroppy, with boats carrying 100 tons able to navigate to the outskirts of the Black Country. Final distribution would have been by road. The documents and plans still exist, I wrote an article about the scheme for Waterways World magazine.

  • @aengusmacnaughton1375
    @aengusmacnaughton1375 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Where was Rebecca? Only behind the camera? Awwwww! And I was looking forward to where you went for lunch and what you ate!!!!! 🙂

  • @peterjohncooper
    @peterjohncooper 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fascinating. Thank you.

  • @samswift1718
    @samswift1718 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    More great work, research, script writing, and video production. I really hope one day you get funded to produce shows for tv or major streaming services

    • @pwhitewick
      @pwhitewick  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks Sam. Very kind.

  • @johnstilljohn3181
    @johnstilljohn3181 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Genius...! Lets have it built, then...

  • @SteamCrane
    @SteamCrane 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Similar grand ideas about stealing water from the US Great Lakes to send out to the dry west. Has met resistance from the huge population around the Great Lakes.

  • @HarryJMac
    @HarryJMac 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I never did work out how you can use a contour canal to supply water. Flowing water needs a slope, maybe a slope of a foot per mile, which would mean that one end of a 400 mile canal needs to be 400 foot lower than the other - awkward for the London end!

    • @johnhockenhull2819
      @johnhockenhull2819 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The flow slope would be significantly less then a foot per mile, as at that rate you’d be creating a one way canal. Consider the Llangollen Canal which has the steepest “slope” or fastest flow of any UK canal due to it effectively bringing drinking water from the River Dee above Llangollen down to Hurleston Reservoir in Cheshire at a rate of several hundred million gallons of water per day (no info on the internet to check this number but it is in that region). If you travel both ways on the Llangollen Canal you appreciate the flow but it’s not so much more than a “normal” canal which also flows. In effect flow is created by the movement of water. So if such a canal were ever constructed the movement of boats in and out of the canal via the lifts would create the flow and, as Boris suggested, the topping up would come from those parts of the canal going through areas of greater rainfall - in much the same way as canal reservoirs do on the existing canal infrastructure.

    • @HarryJMac
      @HarryJMac 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@johnhockenhull2819 I remember hearing many years ago from a lock keeper on the Thames that the slope was a foot per mile.
      I've not been able to check the figure but it seems about right.

    • @johnhockenhull2819
      @johnhockenhull2819 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@HarryJMac And now we are talking about a river not a canal. By design rivers find the shortest route downhill, in most cases ultimately reaching the sea. Of course the River Thames, like many other rivers, has been made more navigable by installing locks and therefore a less severe flow between each pair of locks. And if you take the River Thames from its source to the sea and calculate the average drop then no doubt it would be more than a foot per mile. Of course the point in question was a canal following the 200 feet contour (if I recall correctly) so your point is moot..

  • @michaelmiller641
    @michaelmiller641 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Fascinating!

  • @QALibrary
    @QALibrary 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    oh this must be you best video this year

    • @pwhitewick
      @pwhitewick  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lol.... I'll take that

  • @paulukjames7799
    @paulukjames7799 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great info thanks

  • @michaelcampin1464
    @michaelcampin1464 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Sounds to me like the canal version of HS2 although 80 years ago.

  • @johnward9421
    @johnward9421 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The best so far.

  • @MrGreatplum
    @MrGreatplum 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    A very interesting concept; I wonder if the movement of goods would have ended up not being its ultimate use due to the lack of speed, but more for pipe work and water supply.

  • @rexgeorg7324
    @rexgeorg7324 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    off we go again .... I fear "BiG Oil" wouldn't like this Idea Paul

  • @RichardFelstead1949
    @RichardFelstead1949 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks Paul and I presume Rebecca was behind the camera.

  • @johndean4998
    @johndean4998 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    8:22 - Southern (Coates) Portal of Sapperton Tunnel on the disused Tames & Severn Canal.
    There is a huge network of interconnected rivers and major canals in Belgium, the Netherlands and Germany, with huge boat lifts and vast locks - see the various livestream videos of barges on TH-cam.

  • @billparsons2702
    @billparsons2702 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    It is even more of a good idea now given the possibility of it being the conduit for next generation IT cabling which requires cooling.

  • @petercurrell9344
    @petercurrell9344 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    In the 60s and 70s a friend Ken Dunham and friends proposed a 300ton canal running on a 400 foot contour running from the northeast through East Midlands and Northampton to above London
    To provide transport but more importantly drinking water to Londoners.

  • @GB-lg2cz
    @GB-lg2cz 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Crofton when it opened had the local landowners in uproar. It caused the the local streams to run dry.

  • @2H80vids
    @2H80vids 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I wonder what a mile of canal would cost nowadays, when built to his large dimensions. I would imagine it would be more expensive than new-build railway. Presumably, the 300ft contour line isn't perfect, so you'd need aquaducts/tunnels/bridges etc, not simply a lovely, neat, flat, straight canal.
    Probably slower to build than a railway too and the low speeds would quickly become an issue. Railfreight isn't hugely fast but it's faster than a canal barge. Using 𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒚 rough numbers; London to Glasgow = 400 miles, at 4mph, that's 100 hours steaming, asuming a minimum of two crews, working 12-hour shifts. So, a working week to cover the M1/M6/M74 route, an easy drive in a day? Another possible problem, that just occured to me as I was typing: where would they get all the water to fill the canal after construction?
    It sounds like a interesting idea but it doesn't really hold water(sorry😁). Factoring in the construction and diesel powered barges, it's not going to be 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 eco-friendly either. One final thought: construction would need to start in dozens, hundreds even, of places simultaneously; where are you finding that many navvies, outside of China anyway?
    The farther back in time we go, the better sense it makes but, as a remedy to today's transport problems, back to the drawing board I fear. Still a nice idea though.😁👍

  • @robinhayhurst5943
    @robinhayhurst5943 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Another belter!!!

  • @manmeetsinghmahajan6183
    @manmeetsinghmahajan6183 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice one.

  • @ianbrown9108
    @ianbrown9108 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fascinating stuff.

  • @NukaPlaysGames
    @NukaPlaysGames 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi both. Have you done a video on the elan aqueduct? Think that would very much be up your street

  • @janinapalmer8368
    @janinapalmer8368 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good one Paul ... most interesting... I never knew all this was there ....
    What happened to your better half ? Hope she's ok ... or didn't she fancy walking in all that mud by the canal ..😂

    • @pwhitewick
      @pwhitewick  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ah she was holding the camera most of the time!

    • @janinapalmer8368
      @janinapalmer8368 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@pwhitewick tell Bec she did a good job ... 😀

  • @colinholloway6252
    @colinholloway6252 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Was there ever the a for a Medway / Stour canal through the middle of Kent. Or did the railways overtake the idea?

  • @carolinegray3150
    @carolinegray3150 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good and interesting video

  • @Bobrogers99
    @Bobrogers99 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Although they didn't have today's technology a hundred years ago, building this grand canal would have been easier in one regard: acquiring the land. Today much of the route is occupied by highways, rail and housing estates.

    • @stuarthall6631
      @stuarthall6631 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      And, in those days, fewer folk had the luxury of being "Nimbies"!

    • @markjones4704
      @markjones4704 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      yup a bit different to building a manchester ship canal size canal north to south today too much in the way however look whats being destroyed for hs2 a railway we dont need

    • @skylarius3757
      @skylarius3757 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@markjones4704 The railways need HS2 to free up capacity on the network. By moving high speed trains to their own tracks more trains can take their place which would be better for everyone who uses the railway.

    • @pwhitewick
      @pwhitewick  2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Not a great deal at all Mark. In fact less that a 14 mile motorway in London.

    • @12crepello
      @12crepello 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@markjones4704 Please do your research fully on the reasons for HS2. If we are to have a sustainable, greener transport system for future generations then we need to provide practical and more environmentally friendly alternatives to the car, lorry and plane. Only by increasing the capacity of our trunk rail network can this be achieved.

  • @skylarius3757
    @skylarius3757 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Had this ever been built would it still be in use by freight today?

    • @pwhitewick
      @pwhitewick  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I can't see why not.

  • @chazzyb8660
    @chazzyb8660 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Back in 1942 - when you had total mobilisation, and plans were in hand to begin the building of the Mulberry Harbours? Yup, I think they could have done it, they certainly had the technical competence and the will power, if not the resources. And then they could have used the new canal to bring the Mulberrys down from Scotland and elsewhere without the risks of bringing them around the coastline.

  • @flashbangelectrics7705
    @flashbangelectrics7705 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    He obviously knew that we also live on a level plain earth and not a spherical one .