My book about everything you need to know about the Supreme Court is now available! Amazon: amzn.to/3Jj3ZnS Bookshop (a collection of indie publishers): bookshop.org/books/the-power-of-and-frustration-with-our-supreme-court-100-supreme-court-cases-you-should-know-about-with-mr-beat/9781684810680 Barnes and Noble: www.barnesandnoble.com/w/the-power-of-our-supreme-court-matt-beat/1142323504?ean=9781684810680 Amazon UK: www.amazon.co.uk/s?k=the+power+of+our+supreme+court&crid=3R59T7TQ6WKI3&sprefix=the+power+of+our+supreme+courth%2Caps%2C381&ref=nb_sb_noss Mango: mango.bz/books/the-power-of-our-supreme-court-by-matt-beat-2523-b Target: www.target.com/p/the-power-of-our-supreme-court-by-matt-beat-paperback/-/A-86273023 Walmart: www.walmart.com/ip/The-Power-of-Our-Supreme-Court-How-the-Supreme-Court-Cases-Shape-Democracy-Paperback-9781684810680/688487495 Chapters Indigo: www.chapters.indigo.ca/en-ca/books/the-power-of-our-supreme/9781684810680-item.html?ikwid=The+Power+of+Our+Supreme+Court&ikwsec=Home&ikwidx=0#algoliaQueryId=eab3e89ad34051a62471614d72966b7e
Mr Beat, I appreciate what you do. Thanks for helping me as an immigrant understand the history of and the government of the country I am in and going to be a citizen of.
How do we know where the line is between church and state? Do you think the Lemon Test is sufficient determining whether or not a law violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment? Sign up for Brilliant FOR FREE by going to brilliant.org/MrBeat. The first 200 people that go to that link will also get 20% off the annual Premium subscription.
@@Quintinohthree most people haven't attacked Bernie for his faith at all, even haters of him just call him a commie, I think an athiest or a muslim would have a much harder time getting elected
YESSSSSS!!!!! Yes yes yes!!!! I’m so excited for a new SCB!!! As a 3L law student, your videos have been so enjoyable, entertaining, and one of the most accurate summaries of case briefs I’ve seen on TH-cam. Your content is truly fantastic Mr. Beat and I sincerely look forward to all your uploads. Stay healthy & safe 👍🏼
Wow, thanks for the kind words. That means a lot. I'm glad you dig them, and it just makes my day that law students find them useful. There are so many cases to remember!
@@iammrbeat Oh it most definitely is a lot to remember haha. Nonstop reading and writing lol But it makes my day being able to actually speak to you! So thank you for your reply. As well, your SCB’s were very useful aids during my Constitutional Law classes and even now while I’m taking 1st Amendment. I truly hope the SCB series, as well as the rest of your awesome content, continues going strong!
Mr. Beat would you ever consider doing a presidential losers tier list?, this would include normal losers, incumbent losers and successful 3rd party campaigns like Ross Perot, Theodore Roosevelt, Wallace, etc. I love your videos so I would love to see your direct opinions on the candidates.
Taking a Constitutional Law course at UNC and this video just came in CLUTCH! I always LOVE Mr. Beat! WAHOOO! THANK YOU! Got to read the Everson Case along with Edwards v. Aguillard as well! All about the Establishment Clause! :D
I think the lemon test is good but has room for interpretation. First thing that comes to my mind is "What constitutes excessive?" but there's probably more to it
I like how each of your videos uses that one distinct font. I subconsciously know it in my mind now as the “Mr. Beat font” whenever I see it in anything
Na that case says that the school can't stop individuals from praying at school. It is very specifically saying that banning religion is the same as endorsing it which we already knew because that's what the first amendment is
@@iammrbeat oh, now I see. I didn't pay atention. Also thanks for this video. In my opinion, I belive, as a catoholic that state should be separate from church as in the catoholic values, which I mostly share, is helping the poor, and we can't help the poor by using their taxes on endoctrination
I think you'd find the case of Downes v Bidwell interesting, considering they were part of the "Insular Cases" that defined the political classification of the US territories. Thought it'd seem relevant considering all the talk about PR statehood.
Will you add the outcome of the impeachment trial in the senate in your presidential election video or are you just going to post the video before we know what the outcome will be?
@@iammrbeat That would be an interesting to talk about then but you can still say Trump is the first president in American history to be impeached twice by the house of representatives in your presidential election video.
@@iammrbeat oh I thought that was a supreme court case, thanks for correcting me! Is there any Supreme Court Cases that are black history related that you think you could do this month?
How can this ruling still hold whole states like Arizona pass laws giving state-funded vouchers for parents to spend on private schools, and those schools which benefit from it are also disproportionately Christian ones?
Here is Canada, publically funded Catholic schools are enshrined in the continuation, but because Canada is supposed to be secular, these schools are not supposed to refuse non Catholic students. Which is why growing up I was sent to a Catholic school because my parents didn't like the public option.
Entanglement needs a definition. Based on my understanding... The separation of Church and state is a separation of powers. Civil and ecclesiastic authority resides in different bodies in order to have checks and balances which operate in common law structure. State law determines legality and Church doctrines determine morality. Phrased differently, the state can make an act illegal but cannot make any act guilty (sin). Church doctrines determine which acts are guilty (sin) but cannot make any act illegal. A defendant may choose a bench trial in which the laws of the state will be applied without regard to morality, or they may choose a trial by jury in which the jurors are sworn to give a true verdict. An intrinsically innocent act cannot be converted into a crime by the state. This separation of powers also permits a specialization of labor. If held to the limitations within the Christian bible, "the sword" is only to be used against those who do evil. The state gains legitimacy because it is not dividing people and creating turmoil in attempts to force people to be virtuous; and the Church is free to extol the highest virtues because it does not bear "the sword" to force virtuous behavior. This separation of powers creates a middle ground where people are free to use their discretion. ... A unified civil/ecclesiastic authority will compromise the virtues it preaches because they must be watered down enough to be enforced; and the state will be oppressive and tyrannical because force will be used in efforts to create virtuous behavior.
A employee at my job was fired for taking really long pray breaks . Is this illegal? Can an employee take an hour long prayer break on top of there lunch breaks?
I’ve just found your channel and dear god I wish I knew you existed when I took APUSH. You are really cool to listen to!! Also I love your presidential elections in American history series and I can’t wait for 2020 lmao
Supreme Court of 1971: "This is a valid point with multiple perspectives, we have to maintain the separation of church and state!" Supreme Court of 2022: "Let's take a prayer before we destroy American freedom."
I'm big on separation of church and state, but I actually wasn't immediately sure on that one. I mean, it's not a slam dunk like it would be if, I don't know, the government decided to do something crazy like establish the existence and virtue of god on all of the money they issue. You know, just as an example.
First of all, the government didn't establish a religion, it's just supplemented already previously existing one, in this case, *Catholicism* when the Constitution talks about establishing a religion is talking about a 'state religion' in layman's terms, the government saying one religion is correct while the other religion isn't.
@@iammrbeat I guess it depends on your examples; and what do you mean by "favoring" if you're talkin about finances, ¿then is religion favoring the state when it's followers pay state and federal taxes? If not, then, it's hard for me to see how when the government does vice versa that's "favoring" religion.
@@theflaggedyoutuberii4311 Are followers of a religion not also citizens of a country? You might have a point if churches were paying taxes, but of course they are not.
@@Quintinohthree ¿Is definition of being a 'citizen' of the United States is paying taxes? ¿Illegal immigrants pay taxes are they a citizen? In your opinion is paying taxes the requirement of being a 'citizen?' ¿Are you automatically a citizen because you pay taxes? ¿What's your point? ¿Who's even talking to you; ¿are you mr. beat Jr.?
@@theflaggedyoutuberii4311 My point is that followers of a religion are not exempt from paying taxes, but religions are. Expecting followers of a religion to be exempt from taxes is absurd, as is thinking that religious people paying taxes is akin to religions paying taxes. In any case, you are focussing on the wrong thing here, as seems to be a quality of yours. It's not a question of who exactly a citizen is and who pays taxes, it's a question of what constitutes an establishment of religion. Clearly, individual followers of a religion do not constitute an establishment of religion. As to who is talking to me, you are. You are commenting publicly on a platform available to all. All may read and all may reply. If you'd rather not recieve replies from anyone and everyone, you may restrict yourself to a private exchange where only those you choose may read and reply.
a bit of a lesser known case but please do Storer v. Brown! The implications of the scotus supporting people being unable to run for office under certain conditions is interesting
Government funding of religious schools happens in Australia as well. Do you have a video on Runyon v. McCrary, which prohibited segregation academies, ie private schools that discriminated by race?
I am still wondering if Kennedy was actually forcing students to join the prayer. That I would disagree with that court. That would violate Engel v Vitale
I found this video incredibly timely and especially relevant with many voters questioning how President Biden's Catholic upbringing will influence his policy decisions. Thanks, Matt!
The Lemon test seem fine but there should be a way to help private schools strugling financially without donating to a church. It seems pretty obvious that these laws were meant to give children in those private schools a better education, not to side with any religions
I am very much a believer in the separation of church & state. If the “church” receives any funding then they have to pay taxes like any other business. If this is the case a tax will hurt the very small religious orders only to benefit the larger ones. Today’s MEGA churches reap millions of dollars, getting involved in politics that have disrupted the selection process of people running for local & federal offices. Government & religion do not mix as has been seen in through centuries. A “state mandated” religion will give more power to one & the non recognized religions will leave or cease to exist.
Yes under the jurisdiction of the state in educating our posterity, who could deny funding to help with that? They’re still learning academic subjects without having to convey separation of church and state.
“Separation of Church and State” is not part of the constitution. All the constitution says is that the government can’t favor or disfavor any religion. The constitution was written with English history in mind; specifically, the late Tudors. The Founders were afraid of a scenario where different sects would be fighting each other to avoid persecution. When people mention Jefferson’s letter with that phrase, they forget that a) Jefferson wasn’t even in the country when the constitution was being written, and b) his saying that phrase was in response to someone’s fear of persecution. Barring certain lucky evidence being found in certain scenarios, judging by intent is really hard to do, especially with the presumption of innocence standard.
Can you do a Supreme Court briefs episode for Furman vs Georgia and Gregg vs Georgia. In which the Supreme Court struck down capital punishment for the first ruling then reinstated it after the later one
So how do you feel about kennedy v bremerton? Lemon v kurtzman and the subsequent lemon test was overturned after that case. How do we enforce the establishment clause now?
Gotta be honest. I don’t like separation of church and state* I feel like if a smaller government wants to support its local religious institutions it should have the power too, if people don’t like it they should vote. But not on the county, state, and federal level, and not in anyway that actively or passively hinders free practice of another religion or lack there of.
I completely disagree but I respect such a unique opinion. Personally I believe having a government with religion may just hold us back and we should keep secular
Hey Mr. Beat! Love the video! I was just wondering when you will be uploading 'Presidental Election of 2020'. I would love to see it soon! Have a great day.
I would strenuously to diverting public education funds to a for-profit school, religious or not. So what if they're struggling; failing businesses may merit a bail-out in the form of loans, but not what amounts to a direct donation from the taxpayers.
Thank you for the message at the end. I am looking forward to learning what role the late Hugo Chávez played in the ballot process. Something to do with delivering pizzas to Hillary and Chad, oh wait Chad messed up the 2000 election in Miami-Dade. You Americans have a very confusing electoral system, a foreigner like me can hardly keep up.
My book about everything you need to know about the Supreme Court is now available!
Amazon: amzn.to/3Jj3ZnS
Bookshop (a collection of indie publishers): bookshop.org/books/the-power-of-and-frustration-with-our-supreme-court-100-supreme-court-cases-you-should-know-about-with-mr-beat/9781684810680
Barnes and Noble: www.barnesandnoble.com/w/the-power-of-our-supreme-court-matt-beat/1142323504?ean=9781684810680
Amazon UK: www.amazon.co.uk/s?k=the+power+of+our+supreme+court&crid=3R59T7TQ6WKI3&sprefix=the+power+of+our+supreme+courth%2Caps%2C381&ref=nb_sb_noss
Mango: mango.bz/books/the-power-of-our-supreme-court-by-matt-beat-2523-b
Target: www.target.com/p/the-power-of-our-supreme-court-by-matt-beat-paperback/-/A-86273023
Walmart: www.walmart.com/ip/The-Power-of-Our-Supreme-Court-How-the-Supreme-Court-Cases-Shape-Democracy-Paperback-9781684810680/688487495
Chapters Indigo: www.chapters.indigo.ca/en-ca/books/the-power-of-our-supreme/9781684810680-item.html?ikwid=The+Power+of+Our+Supreme+Court&ikwsec=Home&ikwidx=0#algoliaQueryId=eab3e89ad34051a62471614d72966b7e
Mr Beat, I appreciate what you do.
Thanks for helping me as an immigrant understand the history of and the government of the country I am in and going to be a citizen of.
It's my pleasure. Thanks for the kind words!
How do we know where the line is between church and state? Do you think the Lemon Test is sufficient determining whether or not a law violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment?
Sign up for Brilliant FOR FREE by going to brilliant.org/MrBeat. The first 200 people that go to that link will also get 20% off the annual Premium subscription.
Hello Mr. Beat. Remember me :)
Are you still working on the 2020 Presidential Election?🤔
Hello Mr. Beat
what day is the 2020 presidential election vid gonna come out
Hi Mr beat
This was on my AP Gov test yesterday, if only I could've convinced my teacher to push the test back lol
thats very specific unfortunate timing
Oh dang, that's bad luck. Did you get the question right?
@@iammrbeat I did! It was more of a question based on the ruling, but Lemon v. Kurtzman was mentioned.
Sweet. We get another one. Thanks Mr.beat. Looking forward to the vid of the election of 2020.
Thank YOU :D
@@iammrbeat Will the 2020 election vid be the next vid after this?
@@wparts1091 he said February 2021, somewhere, so I think so.
I think not electing people based on their religious beliefs helps
Imagine an atheist running for President.
@@iammrbeat Imagine a non-christian running for President.
Not sure which one would cause more of an uproar a Muslim running for potus or an atheist running for potus
@@Quintinohthree most people haven't attacked Bernie for his faith at all, even haters of him just call him a commie, I think an athiest or a muslim would have a much harder time getting elected
@@iammrbeat I'm sure many atheists have ran and several won. They just either denied it or didn't bring it up.
YESSSSSS!!!!! Yes yes yes!!!! I’m so excited for a new SCB!!! As a 3L law student, your videos have been so enjoyable, entertaining, and one of the most accurate summaries of case briefs I’ve seen on TH-cam. Your content is truly fantastic Mr. Beat and I sincerely look forward to all your uploads. Stay healthy & safe 👍🏼
Wow, thanks for the kind words. That means a lot. I'm glad you dig them, and it just makes my day that law students find them useful. There are so many cases to remember!
@@iammrbeat Oh it most definitely is a lot to remember haha. Nonstop reading and writing lol But it makes my day being able to actually speak to you! So thank you for your reply. As well, your SCB’s were very useful aids during my Constitutional Law classes and even now while I’m taking 1st Amendment. I truly hope the SCB series, as well as the rest of your awesome content, continues going strong!
Mr. Beat would you ever consider doing a presidential losers tier list?, this would include normal losers, incumbent losers and successful 3rd party campaigns like Ross Perot, Theodore Roosevelt, Wallace, etc. I love your videos so I would love to see your direct opinions on the candidates.
I second this
Definitely, or at least a video looking at them in more depth in another way.
Horace Greeley is the best presidential loser. He leaked secret information from congress to his newspaper and he died before the electors could vote.
That would be cool. Nine of them are alive today.
I think hubert humphrey or WJB are the best would-be presidents.
Excellent video, but can we talk about how the music, slaps. Also the 2020 election video next week, awesome!
WOOT, and thank you so much. :D
When the Supreme Court gives you lemons, well...
#supremecourtjokes
@@iammrbeat 😆
Taking a Constitutional Law course at UNC and this video just came in CLUTCH! I always LOVE Mr. Beat! WAHOOO! THANK YOU! Got to read the Everson Case along with Edwards v. Aguillard as well! All about the Establishment Clause! :D
I think the lemon test is good but has room for interpretation. First thing that comes to my mind is "What constitutes excessive?" but there's probably more to it
i LOVE supremecourtbriefs
I wish more folks did!
@@iammrbeat I definitely do!
It's a great day when Mr. Beat uploads
Great video!
I like how each of your videos uses that one distinct font. I subconsciously know it in my mind now as the “Mr. Beat font” whenever I see it in anything
I do use different fonts for the Supreme Court Briefs and presidential elections series, but yep it's good ol' Superclarendon for all other videos.
Overruled by Kennedy v Bremerton School District (2022)
How so?
Na that case says that the school can't stop individuals from praying at school. It is very specifically saying that banning religion is the same as endorsing it which we already knew because that's what the first amendment is
@@yonizaslavsky4246 Gorsuch says so
The only time I want to hear sirens. That and if Scott Steiner is around.
lol what about in Dr. Dre songs?
Had to make an important presentation about the Supreme Court today. I was greatly inspired by your videos.
Thanks for the great content ^^
Wow, that's terrific. How'd the presentation go?
Very well😄👍
Favorite series on TH-cam
Woah thank you!
Eating iced oatmeal cookies dunked in a cup of strong coffee, while watching another Mr. Beat video! Ahhhhhh.....does it get any better?
I'm jealous of your iced oatmeal cookies. Thanks for the kind words. :)
Wow, that song at the end is a banger. Added it to my study playlist. Mr. Beat's hiding hard hitting bangers under the guise of history lessons.
Lemons huh, next up the case of Orange Vs Apple
Which just so happen to be real companies...
@@iammrbeat ah you got my joke
Does that case really exist?
Sounds like Trump suing Apple because they won’t platform Parler lol
The rise is Christian nationalism in America is frightening and sad. Separation of church and state has gone out the window all over this country.
Mr beat with another great video
Thank you! :D
@@iammrbeat thanks for replying 👍🏼
Am I the only one waiting for the 2020 edition of "Presidential Election In American History?"
Did you see the message at the end of this video?
@@iammrbeat oh, now I see. I didn't pay atention. Also thanks for this video. In my opinion, I belive, as a catoholic that state should be separate from church as in the catoholic values, which I mostly share, is helping the poor, and we can't help the poor by using their taxes on endoctrination
You're not alone
(Edit)In a week or so
Mr. Beat Nice!
@The_Poro_King wtf
I think you'd find the case of Downes v Bidwell interesting, considering they were part of the "Insular Cases" that defined the political classification of the US territories. Thought it'd seem relevant considering all the talk about PR statehood.
It made a distinction between Alaska, Hawaii, and the other continetal and the other insular territories.
Will you add the outcome of the impeachment trial in the senate in your presidential election video or are you just going to post the video before we know what the outcome will be?
No, I'm already making the video. I might add that for the 2024 election video, however.
@@iammrbeat That would be an interesting to talk about then but you can still say Trump is the first president in American history to be impeached twice by the house of representatives in your presidential election video.
Thanks for making history and America so interesting
Well thank _you_ for the kind words.
It's always a good day when a Supreme Court brief is uploaded! Since it's Black History month, can you do Gayle v. Browder?
Well thank you! Surprisingly, that Gayle v. Browder case never made it to the Supreme Court. Regardless, great suggestion.
@@iammrbeat oh I thought that was a supreme court case, thanks for correcting me! Is there any Supreme Court Cases that are black history related that you think you could do this month?
Can you do a video on Mayo v. Satan? It’s one of my favorite cases out there.
I love that case, too, but it's not a Supreme Court case...just a federal case.
Mayo v. Satan?So it was Pete Buttiegige against George Soros? (sorry I had to)
@@iammrbeat
Huh?
How can this ruling still hold whole states like Arizona pass laws giving state-funded vouchers for parents to spend on private schools, and those schools which benefit from it are also disproportionately Christian ones?
It was overruled in 2022
I randomly found this channel. And i love it
When is the 2020 election video coming?
This month
Did you see his message at the end of the video!?
Next week
Bro I just learned this in my AP US Government class lol
I guess I should have released it a bit earlier!
Cool video
U didn’t even watch it
I’m about to but all his videos are good
The best kind of bias lol
Here is Canada, publically funded Catholic schools are enshrined in the continuation, but because Canada is supposed to be secular, these schools are not supposed to refuse non Catholic students. Which is why growing up I was sent to a Catholic school because my parents didn't like the public option.
Entanglement needs a definition.
Based on my understanding... The separation of Church and state is a separation of powers. Civil and ecclesiastic authority resides in different bodies in order to have checks and balances which operate in common law structure.
State law determines legality and Church doctrines determine morality. Phrased differently, the state can make an act illegal but cannot make any act guilty (sin). Church doctrines determine which acts are guilty (sin) but cannot make any act illegal. A defendant may choose a bench trial in which the laws of the state will be applied without regard to morality, or they may choose a trial by jury in which the jurors are sworn to give a true verdict. An intrinsically innocent act cannot be converted into a crime by the state.
This separation of powers also permits a specialization of labor. If held to the limitations within the Christian bible, "the sword" is only to be used against those who do evil. The state gains legitimacy because it is not dividing people and creating turmoil in attempts to force people to be virtuous; and the Church is free to extol the highest virtues because it does not bear "the sword" to force virtuous behavior. This separation of powers creates a middle ground where people are free to use their discretion. ... A unified civil/ecclesiastic authority will compromise the virtues it preaches because they must be watered down enough to be enforced; and the state will be oppressive and tyrannical because force will be used in efforts to create virtuous behavior.
A employee at my job was fired for taking really long pray breaks . Is this illegal? Can an employee take an hour long prayer break on top of there lunch breaks?
I’ve just found your channel and dear god I wish I knew you existed when I took APUSH. You are really cool to listen to!!
Also I love your presidential elections in American history series and I can’t wait for 2020 lmao
Justice White, Justice Black, Justice Blackmun
Always well done.
Thank you John!
Hey Mr. Beat can you do a video on the In re Gault case
I had to look that one up, but what an important case!
Hey Mr. Beat love your vids! Can I get a heart!
Of course you can. Thanks for watching. :D
Also here’s a video request:
Comparing Trinidad and Tobago. (The country in the lesser antilles)
I have a lemon tree in my backyard. Life gave me lemons. So I make lemon tarts, lemon chicken, and, of course, lemonade.
Dang that's awesome
Cool video. Would be nice to do a similar series (presidential and briefs) but with amendments, the whole process and the end vote for each).
I plan on it for the fall!
@@iammrbeat nice, thanks for the reply
Wow! Never been this early before!
Yayness
Supreme Court of 1971: "This is a valid point with multiple perspectives, we have to maintain the separation of church and state!"
Supreme Court of 2022: "Let's take a prayer before we destroy American freedom."
it will be interesting to see how this develops in the future
I'm big on separation of church and state, but I actually wasn't immediately sure on that one. I mean, it's not a slam dunk like it would be if, I don't know, the government decided to do something crazy like establish the existence and virtue of god on all of the money they issue. You know, just as an example.
Is this video reference to what’s going on in Iowa’s charter school voucher controversy going on right now doing right now Mr Beat?
If so thank you
It's certainly related!
Man you have got to do a Top 10/5 first ladies
That would be perfect timing too. Since president's day is next week.
Heck yeah
Big ups from Israel mr.beat❤
Always cool to see viewers in different countries! :)
Do Harris Funeral Homes v. EEOC or Altitude Express v. Zarda
Two really important recent cases!
Mr. Beat! Wonderful video! Your presentation style is like no other! Keep it up!
Mr. Beat for president! BEAT2024
First of all, the government didn't establish a religion, it's just supplemented already previously existing one, in this case, *Catholicism* when the Constitution talks about establishing a religion is talking about a 'state religion' in layman's terms, the government saying one religion is correct while the other religion isn't.
But sometimes favoring one religion can, in effect, have similar consequences to establishing a religion. Does that make sense?
@@iammrbeat I guess it depends on your examples; and what do you mean by "favoring" if you're talkin about finances, ¿then is religion favoring the state when it's followers pay state and federal taxes? If not, then, it's hard for me to see how when the government does vice versa that's "favoring" religion.
@@theflaggedyoutuberii4311 Are followers of a religion not also citizens of a country? You might have a point if churches were paying taxes, but of course they are not.
@@Quintinohthree ¿Is definition of being a 'citizen' of the United States is paying taxes? ¿Illegal immigrants pay taxes are they a citizen? In your opinion is paying taxes the requirement of being a 'citizen?' ¿Are you automatically a citizen because you pay taxes? ¿What's your point?
¿Who's even talking to you; ¿are you mr. beat Jr.?
@@theflaggedyoutuberii4311 My point is that followers of a religion are not exempt from paying taxes, but religions are. Expecting followers of a religion to be exempt from taxes is absurd, as is thinking that religious people paying taxes is akin to religions paying taxes.
In any case, you are focussing on the wrong thing here, as seems to be a quality of yours. It's not a question of who exactly a citizen is and who pays taxes, it's a question of what constitutes an establishment of religion. Clearly, individual followers of a religion do not constitute an establishment of religion.
As to who is talking to me, you are. You are commenting publicly on a platform available to all. All may read and all may reply. If you'd rather not recieve replies from anyone and everyone, you may restrict yourself to a private exchange where only those you choose may read and reply.
I only respect those that have earned my respect!
Sounds reasonable. :)
What about the separation between lemons and steak?
🍋 🥩
LOL
Underrated comment
a bit of a lesser known case but please do Storer v. Brown! The implications of the scotus supporting people being unable to run for office under certain conditions is interesting
Also please do Paramount pictures v United States as i feel it’s relevant agin with the age of streaming
That's on my list. Great suggestion!
You gotta do the Standard Oil case!!
Hey mr beat! Not gonna lie you are my favorite historian. ( at least left leaning one )
Thank you!
Government funding of religious schools happens in Australia as well.
Do you have a video on Runyon v. McCrary, which prohibited segregation academies, ie private schools that discriminated by race?
u r the best mr beat
Thanks, but you're the best.
Ruling has been overturned
Essentially yes
I am still wondering if Kennedy was actually forcing students to join the prayer. That I would disagree with that court. That would violate Engel v Vitale
This channel is amazing ‼️
I found this video incredibly timely and especially relevant with many voters questioning how President Biden's Catholic upbringing will influence his policy decisions. Thanks, Matt!
As a special education teacher, I’d love to see a Supreme Court Briefs on PARC v. PA
@mrbeat make a video on Trump V Hawaii
I plan on it!
Great job like always
I appreciate that!
The Lemon test seem fine but there should be a way to help private schools strugling financially without donating to a church. It seems pretty obvious that these laws were meant to give children in those private schools a better education, not to side with any religions
well,if your public school is not religious then it can get more donations that way.
My tax money is NOT going to your fucking religious school.
Great VID!!!
I am very much a believer in the separation of church & state. If the “church” receives any funding then they have to pay taxes like any other business. If this is the case a tax will hurt the very small religious orders only to benefit the larger ones.
Today’s MEGA churches reap millions of dollars, getting involved in politics that have disrupted the selection process of people running for local & federal offices. Government & religion do not mix as has been seen in through centuries. A “state mandated” religion will give more power to one & the non recognized religions will leave or cease to exist.
Yes under the jurisdiction of the state in educating our posterity, who could deny funding to help with that? They’re still learning academic subjects without having to convey separation of church and state.
I'm sure you've answered this somewhere and I didn't see, when do you plan on making that 2020 election video?
He says next week after all the ads
It’s the next video 😁
Do you have a date yet for when the 2020 election video is coming out?
ARE YOU TELLING ME YOU DIDN'T WATCH THE VIDEO 'TILL THE VERY END?!? :D
Can’t wait till the next video 😁
Will you ever do Paramount Pictures v. United States?
Yeah, it's on my list. A very important and relevant case!
please do a video on the presidency of William Henry Harrison
It will be 30 seconds long. haha, but seriously yes I plan on it eventually
“Separation of Church and State” is not part of the constitution. All the constitution says is that the government can’t favor or disfavor any religion.
The constitution was written with English history in mind; specifically, the late Tudors. The Founders were afraid of a scenario where different sects would be fighting each other to avoid persecution.
When people mention Jefferson’s letter with that phrase, they forget that a) Jefferson wasn’t even in the country when the constitution was being written, and b) his saying that phrase was in response to someone’s fear of persecution.
Barring certain lucky evidence being found in certain scenarios, judging by intent is really hard to do, especially with the presumption of innocence standard.
I am so excited for the 2020 presidential election video!
What date is it releasing? I've been waiting since the inauguration.
@@Sillykat321 I think it's next Friday
@@Sillykat321 I’ve been waiting since Biden was announced the 46th President lol
Consider looking into the case of Crawford v. Washington. It was mentioned in Season 4 Episode 10 of Better Call Saul.
You should make a Supreme Court Briefs on Atkins v. Virginia
Could you do an episode on Bostock v. Clayton County, GA? Or are you waiting until the Equality Act is brought up again in Congress?
Could you explained the most recent Supreme Court case of Bostock v. Clayton County?
Hey Mr. Beat! Are you going to do a video about the 2020 election for your election series? No rush or anything, just seeing if it’s in the works.
He said it next
@@The_Poro_King oh okay! Thanks for the info. Appreciated :)
Can you do a Supreme Court briefs episode for Furman vs Georgia and Gregg vs Georgia. In which the Supreme Court struck down capital punishment for the first ruling then reinstated it after the later one
HOW DOES MR BEAT NOT HAVE 1 MILLION SUBSCRIBERS YET?!?!?! PEOPLE! SUBSCRIBE!
Well thank you. :D
About that,
Yeah, Utah is going to need to work on that...
3:42 I love how the supreme court decided to clarify vague wording using _more_ vague wording, What the heck does "Excessive Entanglement" mean?
So how do you feel about kennedy v bremerton? Lemon v kurtzman and the subsequent lemon test was overturned after that case. How do we enforce the establishment clause now?
Do a video on the 2020 election
DID YOU SEE THE END OF THE VIDEO!!!!!!???????????
The next video
@@mikaelleonbriones6356 I usually stop the video when he starts to talk about his sponsor but I guess I won’t do that anymore
Gotta be honest. I don’t like separation of church and state* I feel like if a smaller government wants to support its local religious institutions it should have the power too, if people don’t like it they should vote. But not on the county, state, and federal level, and not in anyway that actively or passively hinders free practice of another religion or lack there of.
I completely disagree but I respect such a unique opinion. Personally I believe having a government with religion may just hold us back and we should keep secular
Hey Mr. Beat! Love the video! I was just wondering when you will be uploading 'Presidental Election of 2020'. I would love to see it soon! Have a great day.
Looking forward to the 2020 Presidential Election Video 👀
God I need that video, we have been waiting for it for 4 years, 4YEARS!!!!
It's been weird making it.
@@iammrbeat welp, at least the memes where good
I would strenuously to diverting public education funds to a for-profit school, religious or not. So what if they're struggling; failing businesses may merit a bail-out in the form of loans, but not what amounts to a direct donation from the taxpayers.
Mr. Beat, you should cover FCC v. AT&T in a future Supreme Court Briefs video.
Holy crap, what a great suggestion. You have the best suggestions, Devin.
When do you think your 2020 presidential election video will come out? (also I suggest you do an obscure Supreme Court case next)
Does anyone know the Rhode Island case that is mentioned?
Do you think you could cover Atkins vs Virginia? Love your videos!
Thank you for the message at the end. I am looking forward to learning what role the late Hugo Chávez played in the ballot process. Something to do with delivering pizzas to Hillary and Chad, oh wait Chad messed up the 2000 election in Miami-Dade. You Americans have a very confusing electoral system, a foreigner like me can hardly keep up.
Oh boy, I guess the comment section will be interesting. :/