Carbon Structures from Pencils to Jetpacks

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 60

  • @ACSReactions
    @ACSReactions  2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    Graphene is great at conducting electricity, but if you cut the super thin sheets into ribbons - like for connecting parts on a computer chip - the ragged edges of the ribbon impede the electrons’ movement. So instead, some scientists deposited carbon right onto ridges of silicon carbide and found that the electrons moved along the edges “like light travels down an optical fiber.” One description described the movement as “ballistic.” It’s fast. Really fast. This could change everything… but that was 2014 and I’m still not taking a jetpack to work.

    • @krischens2433
      @krischens2433 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      People rarely make ribbons by "cutting" them now. Nowaday you make ribbons "bottom-up" from depositing a molecule on a surface and allowing it to self-assemble in a 1D structure such that you don't get any ragged edges and hence can observe ballistic transport... Additionally, you can also open a bandgap in graphene nanoribbons and control the value by adjusting the width or edge structure.

    • @JaxesGame
      @JaxesGame ปีที่แล้ว

      😊 really expensive bulletproof clothing made with graphene has actually hit the market😂 the commercial of the guy shooting himself Point Blank makes me think it really should be military issue.

  • @BRUXXUS
    @BRUXXUS 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I've always found the subject of these various carbon structures, and potential uses, super fascinating. This was a really fun and informative video!

  • @blackmoor5708
    @blackmoor5708 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This might be nitpicky, but diamonds are not the strongest known substance, but rather the hardest known substance.
    Diamonds are the best at cutting and scratching, but are actually very brittle when faced with hard impact.

  • @平和-v1z
    @平和-v1z 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Twistronics is actually pretty cool tbh...

    • @ACSReactions
      @ACSReactions  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      We thought so - only came across it shortly before filming and knew we had to include it in the video!

  • @irvy123
    @irvy123 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I love this channel! You guys are doing great work

  • @dwaynezilla
    @dwaynezilla 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    "Carbosoccer"?! Thankfully we weren't stuck with _that_ one.

    • @AlexDainisPhD
      @AlexDainisPhD 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah that one was particularly unfortunate...

    • @eaterdrinker000
      @eaterdrinker000 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Isn't that the premise for "Rocket League"?

  • @dwaynezilla
    @dwaynezilla 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    "y'know...
    as you do...
    when you're lookin' for carbon space dust"
    Reminds me that on my way home I need to pick up some helium for my carbon space dust!

    • @AlexDainisPhD
      @AlexDainisPhD 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I mean isn't that how we all spend our Tuesday nights?

  • @Brohymn80
    @Brohymn80 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I just watched all your alls' shorts and am scrolling your vids now.. ..many of which I've also seen before.
    ..including this one, which I'll re-watch anyway, but you all should update and maybe do a short on flash graphene. It'd be 'useful'.

  • @pugz3230
    @pugz3230 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    12:05 Superconducters don't have "basically no restistance," they have absolutely none at all.

  • @douglasboyle6544
    @douglasboyle6544 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "Diamonds are also composed of pure carbon atoms"
    Nice flex there 🤣 Congratulations!

    • @eaterdrinker000
      @eaterdrinker000 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Talk about excitement and disappointment!

  • @DH-bf9xb
    @DH-bf9xb 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    We get out of this cycle of excitement and disappointment by teaching better science journalists and having news sources that aren't profit driven.

    • @PotionsMaster666
      @PotionsMaster666 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Or changing the capitalists economy to a democratic, socialist one

  • @prodeous
    @prodeous 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Jetpack wise - Gravity Co. They have one, and you can fly for a few minutes on charge.. :) Still the carbon discussion, it just shows how much difference there is between science and engineering.

  • @GeneShiau
    @GeneShiau 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    One day we'll have to start talking about recycling all these devices that are full of graphene or carbon nanotubes. Carbon is abundant so recycling them is not necessary, but do we need to concern ourselves with the toxicity of any of these carbon structures (like we are worried about benzene) or their ability/lack thereof to break down in nature?

  • @lexinwonderland5741
    @lexinwonderland5741 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    this woman wants her jetpack so bad... GIVE A GIRL A JETPACK!

  • @theoldar
    @theoldar 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Oh yes, I well remember the "buckyball" mania.

  • @BackYardScience2000
    @BackYardScience2000 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What about the carbon fiber rockets that are in use right now? You rarely hear about them and I have no clue why that is. It's incredibly strong, lightweight and used quite often in certain rockets made by certain company. I just thought that was something awesome that could be mentioned that most people don't know about.

  • @Bludgeoned2DEATH2
    @Bludgeoned2DEATH2 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    We Chemists aren’t known for our nomenclature unfortunately 🥺🥺

    • @ACSReactions
      @ACSReactions  2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      That's why we're chemists and not... name-thinker-upperers.

  • @dwaynezilla
    @dwaynezilla 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Buckysheet. Shaken, not stirred.

  • @bdr420i
    @bdr420i ปีที่แล้ว

    Your explanation in amazing 🎉 my mom loves you ❤

  • @Laff700
    @Laff700 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can carbon nanotubes be grown via polymerization?

  • @telotawa
    @telotawa ปีที่แล้ว +1

    7:20 thats not chirality

  • @jabradford32
    @jabradford32 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think the reason that we keep getting disappointed by the promises of these crazy new materials, is related to something I heard at an interview I had with a tech company (one with a few Ms in its name) a few years ago. The person I was talking with said that you can come up with lots of great materials that do great things, but if you can't figure out a way to make a mile of the stuff, it's not really all that useful

  • @LFTRnow
    @LFTRnow ปีที่แล้ว

    Vid is 9 mo old. All see you all again in 5-10 years when the algorithm sends us back here.

  • @skybluskyblueify
    @skybluskyblueify 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If these carbon products were treated like the world treated the COVID vaccine could they then get developed quicker like it did the vaccine [that normally takes years]?

  • @Petch85
    @Petch85 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I do not understand the pencil example. If I put down carbon a layer at a time when using a pencil. How do they create the pencil such that all the graphene layers are in the direction of the carbon rod?

  • @TaliaOutwrong
    @TaliaOutwrong 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I don’t understand how graphene has chirality? Any single carbon would be bonded to four other carbons right? I feel a little foolish asking this but is it some sort of crystal structure, symmetry chirality?

  • @RoyalDetailing661
    @RoyalDetailing661 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Graphene atoms don’t give a Buck! Convince me otherwise.

  • @LA-xj3tz
    @LA-xj3tz 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    How can I make my natto more stringy?

  • @0diyan
    @0diyan 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I remember, I was a pencil eater

    • @eaterdrinker000
      @eaterdrinker000 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I liked leaving teeth marks in the wood.

  • @leechild4655
    @leechild4655 ปีที่แล้ว

    ever now and again we see someone doing a real jet-pack thing and it seems they worked out a lot of balance issues its still not a simple task to sustain that amount of power to stay off the ground for any lengthy time period.

  • @HMAOO86
    @HMAOO86 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This topic was just to show the ring and ask for a jetpack, right?

    • @eaterdrinker000
      @eaterdrinker000 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Talk about excitement and disappointment!

  • @dwaynezilla
    @dwaynezilla 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wait... you don't put graphite into your morning smoothie?
    Wait... Is it bad to? Uhh... _asking for a friend._

  • @randyhollier
    @randyhollier 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    You mentions its only carbon but what element is the white parts

    • @ACSReactions
      @ACSReactions  2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      the white pieces represent the bonds between the carbon atoms.

    • @randyhollier
      @randyhollier 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@ACSReactions thank you

  • @muhangiphilemon3588
    @muhangiphilemon3588 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great

  • @v-niftytrickster4166
    @v-niftytrickster4166 ปีที่แล้ว

    What I learned from this video:
    1) Carbon is dope and very useful.
    2) She is married [1:12] :(

  • @kiedto
    @kiedto 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Alex is a great science communicator and the worst (in a good way) person to pitch carbon based technologies if you want funding. If every new technology creator will take it takes it self less seriously, like Alex does here it will a better and funnier world. Cause common, unless you have good idea on what to do with tiny carbon football (not soccer) stop pitching it as life changing tech.

  • @peterritchie5593
    @peterritchie5593 ปีที่แล้ว

    carbon tracking!

  • @astroch
    @astroch 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dont call the physicist "chemists"

  • @DmNetworks
    @DmNetworks 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    She is so trying to be funny, but she isn't. "where's my jetpack" >>> She just takes presumably humorous phrases and throws them in. Please no! If you are naturally funny that's one thing, but if you aren't, then stick with what you know please, or do it in front of your friends.🙄

  • @sidhuumoosewalagodforme9897
    @sidhuumoosewalagodforme9897 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm waiting for 3 months for samantha Jones to return to reactions again : Vivek.v.b

    • @eaterdrinker000
      @eaterdrinker000 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm going to guess that Dr. Jones is not returning anytime soon. Sorry.