Thank you so much for your kind words and support, @lisakeomaniphet8037 🙏🙏♥️♥️ I’m so glad you’re enjoying the stories every day. If you think your friends would love them too, feel free to share on WhatsApp or social media. Your support means a lot! 😊✨
Thank you so much for your kind words! 😊 If you enjoyed it, feel free to share it with your friends on WhatsApp or social media. Your support means the world! ❤
Listened to your description of ww II. When all other countries in Europe (except US , of course geographically outside the periphery of Europe) were in ruins, it was USSR which suffered the deadliest onslaught of Hitler's Germany and USSR gave the final blow to Germany ie, by devastating Berlin and occupying Reishtag culminating the real end of WW II. US use of atombomb in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, when Japan has already surrendered after the fall of Berlin and suicide of Hitler, were just an excercise to show the world US army's destructive potential which was avoidable. Your description , when it comes to the final advancement of USSR army towards Germany or Berlin, were diligently turning to romanticise the course of war , it seems a deliberate motive to reduce the sufferings of USSR. In my opinion reporting of historical facts should be unbiased, whaever be the political lineage of the country involved whether capitalist ,socialist , despotic or oligrchic. I comment like this because there is a deliberate motive in the story to belittle USSR and eulogise US and European Powers other than Russia . Capitalistic Countries, who later became part of Allied Forces and were antipathic to Russia were of the impression that Russia would be destroyed by Hitler. It forced USSR to enter into a No-War Treaty with Germany in 1939. It was a misconception and to the surprise of everybody, Hitler started his diabolic moves by attacking countries in Europe other than USSR. Reporting of history should be true to it's spirits. Thank You.
Thank you for your thoughtful comment and detailed analysis of the WWII story. I appreciate your perspective and agree that historical reporting should aim to be unbiased and balanced. The immense suffering and contributions of the USSR during the war, as well as the complex motivations and actions of all nations involved, deserve careful attention and respect. Your feedback is invaluable, and we will strive to address these nuances in future content. If you think this story could spark more conversations, feel free to share it on WhatsApp or social media. 😊✨
Thank you for bringing the story
I’m listening every day 🙏🙏♥️♥️
Thank you so much for your kind words and support, @lisakeomaniphet8037 🙏🙏♥️♥️ I’m so glad you’re enjoying the stories every day. If you think your friends would love them too, feel free to share on WhatsApp or social media. Your support means a lot! 😊✨
Let this great opportunity be used by all people all over the world keep Peace on The land!
Thank you once again for this excellent work.
Thank you so much for your kind words! 😊 If you enjoyed it, feel free to share it with your friends on WhatsApp or social media. Your support means the world! ❤
Thanks
You're welcome! I hope it helped with your English learning journey. 😊
The photo is not Franklin Delano Roosevelt, but Theodore Roosevelt. The video is about Franklin Delano.
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
World war 2 is told by us, UK is diffenrent with ww2 told by russia, china, vietnam
Listened to your description of ww II. When all other countries in Europe (except US , of course geographically outside the periphery of Europe) were in ruins, it was USSR which suffered the deadliest onslaught of Hitler's Germany and USSR gave the final blow to Germany ie, by devastating Berlin and occupying Reishtag culminating the real end of WW II. US use of atombomb in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, when Japan has already surrendered after the fall of Berlin and suicide of Hitler, were just an excercise to show the world US army's destructive potential which was avoidable. Your description , when it comes to the final advancement of USSR army towards Germany or Berlin, were diligently turning to romanticise the course of war , it seems a deliberate motive to reduce the sufferings of USSR.
In my opinion reporting of historical facts should be unbiased, whaever be the political lineage of the country involved whether capitalist ,socialist , despotic or oligrchic.
I comment like this because there is a deliberate motive in the story to belittle USSR and eulogise US and European Powers other than Russia . Capitalistic Countries, who later became part of Allied Forces and were antipathic to Russia were of the impression that Russia would be destroyed by Hitler. It forced USSR to enter into a No-War Treaty with Germany in 1939. It was a misconception and to the surprise of everybody, Hitler started his diabolic moves by attacking countries in Europe other than USSR. Reporting of history should be true to it's spirits. Thank You.
Thank you for your thoughtful comment and detailed analysis of the WWII story. I appreciate your perspective and agree that historical reporting should aim to be unbiased and balanced. The immense suffering and contributions of the USSR during the war, as well as the complex motivations and actions of all nations involved, deserve careful attention and respect.
Your feedback is invaluable, and we will strive to address these nuances in future content. If you think this story could spark more conversations, feel free to share it on WhatsApp or social media. 😊✨
DANL /X