The fact that Crawford reported the gruesome death by saying they had "a stiff" in the church says a lot - virtually no one else would've used such a cold, inhumane way of describing Arlis Perry's body. It's not evidence, but it's disgusting.
Some people think Crawford got “turned on” when he discovered her body and then did something about it. That would account for his cold, detached tone of voice when he called it in
I agree it's odd he used the word "stiff", but have to consider he was bitter about the police rejecting him, he thought himself a cop, or at the very least someone with that ego, having more experience than you type arrogance. In that light, I don't find it as much surprising. The problem i have with this official story is a person doesn't kill someone and then proceeds to make it look like a ritual sacrifice satanic setting, to satisfy only himself, then call the police. Surely, he would have known they would consider him. Also, no finger prints on the candles, ice pick, or anything that he may have touched? Seems more like multiple perps involved. Cult activity, tied to SoS . The very first U.S. conviction using DNA happened in 1987, I guess they finally got around to checking this guys dna. If they always felt it was him, then why did they wait 30+ years to check it. This starts to look more and more like the old patsy cover-up. According to Dave McGowans book "Programed to Kill", the CIA uses cults all the time, for multiple purposes. It makes more sense to me than this strange story they came up with. And of course, he was in the military, and of course, he's now dead.
@ManSon Rising well there is a whole book based on her murder, and the detective says the evidence show signs of satanic cult murder, not any guard is mentioned
@@dimifisher7942 Absolutely 100% wrong, as you'd know if you'd actually bothered to read esoteric sources like the Wikipedia entry or even the newspapers. Shame on you. www.paloaltoonline.com/news/2018/06/28/suspect-in-grisly-stanford-memorial-church-murder-kills-self
I still don't buy the official version that states that Crawford did it. It still makes no sense, despite whatever DNA evidence they might have recovered 40 yrs later. They already had DNA evidence from the semen left on the pillow and handprint on the candle used on Arlis and neither matched Crawford's at the time. Why would that suddenly change now? If anything, this fact alone points to a different perpetrator or perpetrators. The police refuses to acknowledge that. It seems to me that Sheriff Smith was just looking for her 15 minutes of fame. They never investigated the existence of a phone listing for a fake Bruce D Perry nor the blonde man who approached Arlis at her work place the day before the murder and who resembled the man that entered the church after her. Nothing adds up in this case. One last thing, why would Crawford just sit still waiting for the cops to show up one day if he was actually guilty? He would've at least moved out of state and tried to change his identity if he was in fact the killer. My guess is that he committed suicide because he thought they were after him to jail him again for the stolen items from Stanford or some other thing (which he didn't want to go to prison for), not murder. THIS IS STILL A COLD CASE TO ME and anyone who has a brain.
7 หลายเดือนก่อน
think he new he was getting setup they may have got some hooker to suduce him to get his dna and he realized they were gonna fk him over
I still don't buy the official version that states that Crawford did it. It still makes no sense, despite whatever DNA evidence they might have recovered 40 yrs later. They already had DNA evidence from the semen left on the pillow and handprint on the candle used on Arlis and neither matched Crawford's at the time. Why would that suddenly change now? If anything, this fact alone points to a different perpetrator or perpetrators. The police refuses to acknowledge that. It seems to me that Sheriff Smith was just looking for her 15 minutes of fame. They never investigated the existence of a phone listing for a fake Bruce D Perry nor the blonde man who approached Arlis at her work place the day before the murder and who resembled the man that entered the church after her. Nothing adds up in this case. One last thing, why would Crawford just sit still waiting for the cops to show up one day if he was actually guilty? He would've at least moved out of state and tried to change his identity if he was in fact the killer. My guess is that he committed suicide because he thought they were after him to jail him again for the stolen items from Stanford or some other thing (which he didn't want to go to prison for), not murder. THIS IS STILL A COLD CASE TO ME and anyone who has a brain.
I still don't buy the official version that states that Crawford did it. It still makes no sense, despite whatever DNA evidence they might have recovered 40 yrs later. They already had DNA evidence from the semen left on the pillow and handprint on the candle used on Arlis and neither matched Crawford's at the time. Why would that suddenly change now? If anything, this fact alone points to a different perpetrator or perpetrators. The police refuses to acknowledge that. It seems to me that Sheriff Smith was just looking for her 15 minutes of fame. They never investigated the existence of a phone listing for a fake Bruce D Perry nor the blonde man who approached Arlis at her work place the day before the murder and who resembled the man that entered the church after her. Nothing adds up in this case. One last thing, why would Crawford just sit still waiting for the cops to show up one day if he was actually guilty? He would've at least moved out of state and tried to change his identity if he was in fact the killer. My guess is that he committed suicide because he thought they were after him to jail him again for the stolen items from Stanford or some other thing (which he didn't want to go to prison for), not murder. THIS IS STILL A COLD CASE TO ME and anyone who has a brain.
Ed Opperman had a guy on named Brian McCracken who claims he walked in on Arlis Perry laying on the altar while a guy played the flute on the altar with an Afro wig on.
@Scoppah Zee no I didn't I'm a native Californian but have done lots of research. The evil there goes back a couple centuries but the modern culture activity goes back to the 30s and moved to pedophilia, animal/human sacrifice, guns, drugs amongst other crimes in the 50s and 60s.
Yeah. Nothing to do with SON OF SAM. In fact, David Berkowitz asked his penpal in California if Ted Bundy did it? Proof that Berkowitz had no connection to this case.
Does this blemish Maury Terry's "The Ultimate Evil"?? And his wild theories about cults that criss-cross the country!!! And he also told that a mysterious man was seen entering the church immediately before the murder!!!
@@kevinmichael2593 This guy could easily have been part of some cult just not obvious. his arrogant attitude is consistent. murder and a ritualistic quality to it is a bit extreme for just disgruntled employee type motives
NOW WE KNOW MAURY TERRY WAS RIGHT AND THIS GUY IS WRONG
yes maury claimed it was the security gaurd ,,i believe ,,,turns out DNA matched ,,maury was right
Amazing how despite such a tragedy, Bruce Perry worked so hard to help children with trauma
He probably became a psychiatrist in large part, because of that experience.
The fact that Crawford reported the gruesome death by saying they had "a stiff" in the church says a lot - virtually no one else would've used such a cold, inhumane way of describing Arlis Perry's body. It's not evidence, but it's disgusting.
i think it was him DNA evidence confirms it
Some people think Crawford got “turned on” when he discovered her body and then did something about it. That would account for his cold, detached tone of voice when he called it in
@@stephenbartlett1167it was clearly personal pleasure. I don't think it had anything to do with Son of Sam.
I agree it's odd he used the word "stiff", but have to consider he was bitter about the police rejecting him, he thought himself a cop, or at the very least someone with that ego, having more experience than you type arrogance. In that light, I don't find it as much surprising. The problem i have with this official story is a person doesn't kill someone and then proceeds to make it look like a ritual sacrifice satanic setting, to satisfy only himself, then call the police. Surely, he would have known they would consider him. Also, no finger prints on the candles, ice pick, or anything that he may have touched? Seems more like multiple perps involved. Cult activity, tied to SoS . The very first U.S. conviction using DNA happened in 1987, I guess they finally got around to checking this guys dna. If they always felt it was him, then why did they wait 30+ years to check it. This starts to look more and more like the old patsy cover-up. According to Dave McGowans book "Programed to Kill", the CIA uses cults all the time, for multiple purposes. It makes more sense to me than this strange story they came up with. And of course, he was in the military, and of course, he's now dead.
Satanists killed her, she was trying to divert a friend of hers from a satanic cult, so it was a short of a revenge
@ManSon Rising well there is a whole book based on her murder, and the detective says the evidence show signs of satanic cult murder, not any guard is mentioned
@ManSon Rising dont think its fairy tale, it looks serious book to me, anyway doesnt matter, believe what you believe
Nope. The handyman, Stephen Crawford, was caught after a DNA test. He committed suicide before he was arrested. Do your homework, okay?
@@evansquilt no, you do your home work, go troll somewhere else
@@dimifisher7942 Absolutely 100% wrong, as you'd know if you'd actually bothered to read esoteric sources like the Wikipedia entry or even the newspapers. Shame on you. www.paloaltoonline.com/news/2018/06/28/suspect-in-grisly-stanford-memorial-church-murder-kills-self
I still don't buy the official version that states that Crawford did it. It still makes no sense, despite whatever DNA evidence they might have recovered 40 yrs later. They already had DNA evidence from the semen left on the pillow and handprint on the candle used on Arlis and neither matched Crawford's at the time. Why would that suddenly change now? If anything, this fact alone points to a different perpetrator or perpetrators. The police refuses to acknowledge that. It seems to me that Sheriff Smith was just looking for her 15 minutes of fame. They never investigated the existence of a phone listing for a fake Bruce D Perry nor the blonde man who approached Arlis at her work place the day before the murder and who resembled the man that entered the church after her. Nothing adds up in this case. One last thing, why would Crawford just sit still waiting for the cops to show up one day if he was actually guilty? He would've at least moved out of state and tried to change his identity if he was in fact the killer. My guess is that he committed suicide because he thought they were after him to jail him again for the stolen items from Stanford or some other thing (which he didn't want to go to prison for), not murder. THIS IS STILL A COLD CASE TO ME and anyone who has a brain.
think he new he was getting setup they may have got some hooker to suduce him to get his dna and he realized they were gonna fk him over
And it turns out it was Steve Crawford this guy sounds like his lawyer
For real
More likely Crawford was a jerk- off rather than a ritualistic serial killer
I still don't buy the official version that states that Crawford did it. It still makes no sense, despite whatever DNA evidence they might have recovered 40 yrs later. They already had DNA evidence from the semen left on the pillow and handprint on the candle used on Arlis and neither matched Crawford's at the time. Why would that suddenly change now? If anything, this fact alone points to a different perpetrator or perpetrators. The police refuses to acknowledge that. It seems to me that Sheriff Smith was just looking for her 15 minutes of fame. They never investigated the existence of a phone listing for a fake Bruce D Perry nor the blonde man who approached Arlis at her work place the day before the murder and who resembled the man that entered the church after her. Nothing adds up in this case. One last thing, why would Crawford just sit still waiting for the cops to show up one day if he was actually guilty? He would've at least moved out of state and tried to change his identity if he was in fact the killer. My guess is that he committed suicide because he thought they were after him to jail him again for the stolen items from Stanford or some other thing (which he didn't want to go to prison for), not murder. THIS IS STILL A COLD CASE TO ME and anyone who has a brain.
Steve Crawford was going to be arrested in 2018 for this murder but he shot himself when was Geniuses lecture?
Right! The new Netflix show brought me here. It’s crazy how at this time they still didn’t think he did it!
Maury and Ted Gunderson shoulda been best friends.
Oh he did it they just can't prosecute a Deadman I remember something about that watching the documentary about Aaron Hernandez
@@Casket_Couture I know, right???!!!!
I still don't buy the official version that states that Crawford did it. It still makes no sense, despite whatever DNA evidence they might have recovered 40 yrs later. They already had DNA evidence from the semen left on the pillow and handprint on the candle used on Arlis and neither matched Crawford's at the time. Why would that suddenly change now? If anything, this fact alone points to a different perpetrator or perpetrators. The police refuses to acknowledge that. It seems to me that Sheriff Smith was just looking for her 15 minutes of fame. They never investigated the existence of a phone listing for a fake Bruce D Perry nor the blonde man who approached Arlis at her work place the day before the murder and who resembled the man that entered the church after her. Nothing adds up in this case. One last thing, why would Crawford just sit still waiting for the cops to show up one day if he was actually guilty? He would've at least moved out of state and tried to change his identity if he was in fact the killer. My guess is that he committed suicide because he thought they were after him to jail him again for the stolen items from Stanford or some other thing (which he didn't want to go to prison for), not murder. THIS IS STILL A COLD CASE TO ME and anyone who has a brain.
This guy will put you to sleep. Just tell the story. Quickly.
Quit your day job. How’s that book coming? Cold case detectives, tough gig, smart determined cops, even with modern DNA capability.
Bruce never re-married :(
Ed Opperman had a guy on named Brian McCracken who claims he walked in on Arlis Perry laying on the altar while a guy played the flute on the altar with an Afro wig on.
Bullshit!!
That makes way more sense than what this guy is selling.
He didn't do it, period, he was involved, not the mastermind tho.
He makes some stupid remarks. In the military, I went through SFQC…specifically, we never discussed icepick murder technique🤔LMFAO
"...can't completely subtract him from the story..." Guss not, when was the killer...
dna can be planted, especially if its been hanging out in evidence for 40 years
Netflix just said it was Crawford and he's since been killed by the police
He shot himself
I stand corrected.
Apparently that was early 2018. Was this lecture after the actual murderer had shot himself? LOL
he killed himself.
@@tbitv2035 April 2017
Well this guy was totally wrong.
I was surprised at the end to hear what he says!! I guess he was proved wrong!! The case is closed!!
For the closeminded, the case is closed.
@@10.11.9 I don't know why I said that..??
@Scoppah Zee Untermyere Park, Yonkers NY. Evil resides there.
@Scoppah Zee no I didn't I'm a native Californian but have done lots of research. The evil there goes back a couple centuries but the modern culture activity goes back to the 30s and moved to pedophilia, animal/human sacrifice, guns, drugs amongst other crimes in the 50s and 60s.
@Scoppah Zee bodies everywhere!! Such a beautiful place yet so tainted with pain & evil!!
Stephen Blake Crawford
Look up Brian McCraken's testimony on TH-cam.
Not trying to be mean but I can't not picture Donald Rumsfeld when I see this guy
I thought the same, but then thought he might be closer to Elmer Fudd when hunting that "waskally wabbit", he-he-he-he!
Welp, got that one wrong.
He's been found and committed suicide. Time to retire!😄
who?
dawn wyke the killer
Yeah. Nothing to do with SON OF SAM.
In fact, David Berkowitz asked his penpal in California if Ted Bundy did it?
Proof that Berkowitz had no connection to this case.
Sounds like another son of Sam case. Involving a female and a hairbrush .
Except, it has. Nothing to do with him, or "satanic" cults.
@@alvodin6197arguably. Its difficult to say.
#HERHOLD REVERSE.
Uh....umm...uh....ah....um....
Does this blemish Maury Terry's "The Ultimate Evil"?? And his wild theories about cults that criss-cross the country!!! And he also told that a mysterious man was seen entering the church immediately before the murder!!!
They found that book in his closet in a book with important papers -at 1:30 th-cam.com/video/xU6NoWUt3xs/w-d-xo.html
Terry's book was nonsense from the get-go. The people gullible enoigh to buy his hooey aren't going to let minor things like facts change their minds.
@@kevinmichael2593 This guy could easily have been part of some cult just not obvious. his arrogant attitude is consistent. murder and a ritualistic quality to it is a bit extreme for just disgruntled employee type motives
@@kevinmichael2593 You are very uninformed!
@@TheGV50 yes he is, but most probably its a cult member troll trying to discredit everything that has to with what they re doing, they are everywhere