Game over Trump defense team was just handed this memo from 1999 It just destroyed the Democrats case for impeachment witnesses. Shocking! POLITICO~ Biden argued ‘against’ witnesses in 1999 impeachment trial! 01/30/2020 08:36 PM “In January 1999, then-Sen. Joe Biden argued strongly against the need to depose additional witnesses or seek new evidence in a memo sent to fellow Democrats ahead of President Bill Clinton’s impeachment trial.” GAME OVER! Checkmate!
Untethered Investigating corruption is not a reason for impeachment it’s a reason for re-election. Trump will win in 2020. Trump will appoint at least two more Supreme Court justices. Trump + America =Greatness.
J K Yes, investigating corruption is good. But if T felt the need for an investigation, he should have requested it from the appropriate people in our own country instead of bringing a leader from another country into our elections-among other things.
James Clark Nobody cares what you think. Facts matter. The fact is Trump is going to get re-elected in 2020 and America is going to have 4 more great years!!!
It is very clear to me from the comments from the very few CNN viewers that are left: you do not really want to hear ANY reasoning that conflicts with your own, AND you will go IMMEDIATELY to ad hominem attacks. Shallow. Abuse of power and especially, "obstruction of Congress" (which is, BY THE WAY, the Constitutional prerogative, if not MANDATE of each of the 3 Branches AGAINST each other), are not impeachable, and are not high crimes or treasonous.
You full of it. I watched the whole hearing. I watch every hearing. Everyone heard and fully comprehend what he was saying. As a matter fact the both parties where talking hypothetically. Every understood. CNN and the house managers just spin it their own way. Don't only base your opinion on his response. Listen to the question and also listen to the house managers.
Lmao Trump is not Epstein dummy! Epstein was a criminal, why aren't you saying anything about who Epstein was running with, they get a pass? U fools are like a bunch of Nazis who just make up propaganda and that's it the accused are guilty, end of story,if u want to live like that move to North Korea!
@Gidget Trevathon HALF OF YOUR CHEESEBALL'S ADMINISTRATION IS IN JAIL. WE HAVE NEVER HAD A PRESIDENT WHERE HALF OF HIS ADMINISTRATION IS IN JAIL. WE HAVE NEVER HAD A BLOODY PRESIDENT WHO SIDES WITH RUSSIA OVER IS INTELLIGENCE. You're a disgrace to this land, to your family and to existence in general
Uuuum I wonder why the sale of Javelin Missiles was approved by Trump and not Obama. The hold on aid never impeded the Javelin Missile supply. Oh dear you've been swallowing too many Democrat "facts"
That's what I'm always challenging tRumpsters to do, and all I ever get is a wall of crickets. The one time a tRumpster gave me a non-answer and challenged me to do the reverse, I said "sure, I'd support tRump if he passed clean water laws, clean air laws, protected our parks and monuments, protected our national forests, protected our coastlines from oil drilling....." After that, I got the traditional crickets.
They wanted to Impeach Obama for his Creame suit and his wife wearing a short sleeve dress (which they than found Jackey Kennedy wearing the same thing). you can youtube Obama creame suit outrage for the FoX news Coverage.... what a scandal right?
Bad news Trump defense team was just handed this memo from 1999 It just destroyed the Democrats case for impeachment witnesses. Shocking! POLITICO~ Biden argued ‘against’ witnesses in 1999 impeachment trial! 01/30/2020 08:36 PM “In January 1999, then-Sen. Joe Biden argued strongly against the need to depose additional witnesses or seek new evidence in a memo sent to fellow Democrats ahead of President Bill Clinton’s impeachment trial.” GAME OVER! Checkmate!
This man can turn a lie around with his twisted mouth and make it sound like it's the truth No wonder they hired him he forgets his own words. I never saw a group of Lawyer ignore the truth or what's right this is why the United States of America is so divided ppl like them who munipulate the system.
Exactly. I saw his whole argument in his own words from his own mouth. Now he's saying he didn't say it. Btw, Kirt Vonnegut is one of my favorite authors, Kilgore Trout is probably his best character. :)
@Gonzo Kaporal I really don't understand why people are even taking this crazy ass argument seriously. So this is where we are, president is now king! Hate to see how all this flips when a different party is on office
Oh please O.J Simpson was fairly tried in a Court of law, why does the racist LAPD Detective Mark Furhman get a pass? Planting evidence, which throws the accused case out in the trash! Justice idiot!
And that's exactly what Dershowitz is doing. With Trump, it's always everybody else who is out of step, not him. Now we have Alan Underwear trying to do the same.
@@Outdoorsguy1212 but your the puke and joke inbred. Common sense is free and you still missed it. If your president was such and innocent man and had a perfect call why not let all witnesses testify? It's only one real answer even for ignorant inbreds as your self.
Yea, I totally agree, whoever thought it was "ok" to have this pathological liar represented by another professional liar who should be retired and, has nothing to lose. He is one foot in the grave, and his kids and grand kids are set for life. it doesn't matter what happens in this trail to him, he does not give a rats ass.
Old Dude ? This "Old Dude" is a Constitution Law Professor , his Students sit on the Supreme Court as well as Federal Judges Across this Nation . Boobin Toobin and Wolf head blitzer are lower than whale sh!t . #CnnSucks
Even scholars get their words mixed up when they are angry. You'd be angry too if a massive news network had been putting words in your mouth all day long.
You got to be kidding me!!!! Ain't no way in hell that Jeffrey Toobin schooled Alan Dershowitz. Jeffrey Toobin is a CNN biased stooge. Who gets paid to be anti-Trump, and Anti-Republican.
@@mikewazz8986 He makes perfect sense to me. I guess when you have an open mind, shit just make sense. Most of you people just ain't trying to understand him just because he's defending Trump. #Smh #Sad
@Daniel Chen dersh is 81 years old. i'm not getting any younger myself, but i am getting ~seriously~ sick of the ancient privileged white guy take on how sh*t should be run. they clearly have no real life or they would retire and enjoy all that cash they've stacked up... but all they care about is ~power~.
To be fair, thats not necessarily something bad. It just means he spoke about something else, like the motive or the legality of the case. Now, with that said, I think he's a twofaced idiot that think this is a good opportunity for a legacy or something. But in reality it will only further tarnish his legacy.
"I didn´t say what i said", Man where did i hear that before!? Off course he said it and it wasn´t a reply to the House Managers or a question from Democrats. He allready answered that question and than went on with his charade!
Alan Dershowitz, Harvard Law professor: "I got a massage at epstein's island but *I DID NOT TAKE MY UNDERWEAR OFF*" .... Now he's helping the President get away with treason. This is what we've come to. May God help us all.
True, but please spare my poor tired brain with a visual that I will not be able to erase from my mind until the day I die and my thought processes cease. It's not fair that my mind should be haunted until that day. Bottom line, people are the company they keep, birds of a feather always flock together. The common knowledge of Doucheowitz behavior and proclivities for underaged teens is without doubt. He knows he can keep denying such as long as Epstein is dead and there is no chance of any evidence coming forth. I have no doubt that there is video evidence of Doucheowitz engaged in illegal inappropriate sexual activities with underaged girls that would confirm his pedophilia. But as long as Epstein's estate has possession of that evidence, it will remain hidden. Yet, we all know that there is no way anyone, male or female, who would physically touch that gross, balding old wrinkled, bad breathed, out of shaped 80 year old desperate perv unless they were being paid the kind of money that Jeffrey Epstein had access to, no eff'in way, not on your life.
he is the guy saying other scholars have contradicted themselves in relation to impeachment on political bias, but hes actually the guy who said something different when clinton was under impeachment, and then turn 180 when trump is under impeachment..he doesnt even need to tell us he did not vote for trump, because his motives are already questionable
@INTHEPAC - quit with the partisan politics. It's exactly what's fucking up this country. Also, this lawyer is defending a Republican president and the senators who support him. So there's no legs to your jab.
@ALON ZADOK Alan established that he was correct when he said that you don't need a crime to impeach a president, yet he said at the same time that he's much MORE CORRECT when he says that you NEED a crime to impeach a president. That's the definition of insane.
dersh says he wasn't there as one of trump's lawyers. he says he was a nonpartison fact witness. hey.... the repubs had a witness, so now bring in bolton as a witness for the dems.
@David Mc yea, keep listening to Trump. That's where you'll get the truth from🤦🏻♂️ When Trump said, "I could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and I wouldn't lose any votes" he wasn't calling you guys loyal, he was calling you stupid
@@seanbrennan9188 That's what happened -- Dershowitz is a Zionist serving the interests of Netanyahu. Dershowitz even acknowledged it in so many words, when he explained his motivation for serving as a defense lawyer (during the impeachment).
His hypothetical argument falls flat. Even if you give him “If a President has a small upside politically to his re-election then it can’t be an impeachable quid pro quo” Both his arguments visa vis both Obama and Biden don’t impact the electability of someone else. That’s an important distinction. If Obama decides against striking Syria because it would have political downside is very different than a President using his power and intercepting a transaction to adversely effect the electability of someone else. One instance contains self interest and the other has detrimental damages to another party.
he would likely try and argue every and any action can have intended or unintended consequences for this opposition like a butterfly effect. His reasoning is sound, but its just simply too loose and forgiving. What Deroshowitz forgot is that he is not arguing in favor of the SPIRIT OF THE LAW.
@@sunnylilme It's hard not to conclude that Dersh has been compromised, just like graham and Cruz and others. Their support of Trump goes far beyond being partisan. They aer openly supporting illegal acts that damage the country, undermine the consitution and effectively grant the incoming Dem president UNLIMITED POWER.
protectbodythetans He’s implicated in Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes. Trump could be threatening him with prosecution through William Barr. You can’t put it past these crooks.
@@mrspiff6955 I'll bet anything that Epstein had hidden cameras in every room. Someone's got the goods on a lot of powerful people. I can't imagine any good reason why Dershowitz (and a whole lot of others) would be making such a complete ass of himself for Trump otherwise.
Dolphin Man ...maybe once he was an informed academic. Unfortunately he is now a laughing stock of all academia irregardless of your political bias. Sometimes retirement should be forced upon so-called professors of the Harvard Old Boys Club. C'mon now, be honest, he's made a complete fool of himself. Then he tries to unravel it back and he got owned by a former student. There's a reason he's back in Florida, and its not because he had a "fanily thing". 😆. If he cared that much about the constitution he would have stayed until the bitter end to argue his point. He knows he fucked up, he ran back down to where he should stay permanently with all the other cronies (FL) with his tail between his legs. But, like all lawyers, he can't ever admit he was wrong and so comes back on CNN and tries to defend himself by talking over others and interrupting those who point out his lunacy...and repeatedly makes a big point abou where his politics lie and even states who he voted for. A closet Trumper if ever there was one Alan. You're not fooling anyone. #HarvardfireAlan
Alan Dershowitz’s defense of Trump in the Senate impeachment trial, according to Harvard Law professor Laurence Tribe: “Alan is completely wacko on this.”
Well to be fair, and I love professor tribe's enthusiasm, but that's calling the kettle black. It might be best if both these professors continue the debate on campus where semantics can be fine tuned. The public needs real life answers.
@Trump 2020: A science writer with a PhD in neuroscience named Bobby Azarian has laid out why Trump supporters (and a lot of Republicans in general) are so quick to fall in line with politicians like Trump who are clearly charlatans. He identifies five different common traits that we see in these die hard supporters, and they are each more disturbing as the list goes on. Ring of Fire’s Farron Cousins discusses this:1) Authoritarian Personality Syndrome 2) Social Dominance Orientation 3) Prejudice 4) Intergroup Contact 5) Deprivation
@Trump 2020 are u nuts .he said he's not part of the defence team but he's on there team .they wanted him to stay as he said they begged him to stay .he sayes he is not on Trump's defence team but he is .let's see if he would of said the founding fathers would of wanted to get to the truth I bet he wouldn't be with that fake Christian and phony Jay sekulow defence team .also isn't there a tape of him in 1998 saying impeachmeant is whatever the house and Congress say it is .him talking about what other law professors have said when he said that in 1998 .oh and by the way Trump is going to get beat bad in the election all this did is make people more upset with these disgracefull Republicans and make people even want to vote him out more .thanks Republicans for saying you can have a trial with no witnesses and making sure this one time experiment as a president will be a one term president on election night by the people of this country .I can't wait to see Kelly Ann and Trump's face when they lose the election .plus great job to the Lincoln project
"I deliberately did not talk about the facts". When you deliberately avoid arguing the facts and instead choose to predicate your argument on a slew of obscure hypotheticals, it speaks volumes about the merits of your argument and calls into question your personal motives.
Catharine Dupuis He isn’t a constitutional scholar he’s a defense attorney, which is why he followed the typical defense attorney blueprint: When you can’t disprove the facts simply ignored them and focus on hypotheticals. It is a defense attorney’s job to come up with a defense even when they know that their client is guilty. Also: Dershowitz was just on CNN contradicting himself again...agreeing that a president can be impeached for abuse of power and he even used Nixon as an example.
Another one who doesn't grasp context. No, they were not talking about the specific facts of the Trump case. They were speaking in general and hypothetical terms about what kind of motive is impeachable.
Anthony Iuculano So pressuring a foreign government to interfere in an upcoming US election isn’t impeachable but lying about getting a blowjob is? Also based on what Dershowitz argued yesterday on the senate floor nothing is impeachable. But of course he told a different story today on CNN. But again, that’s a defense attorney’s job, to present arguments in favor of their clients regardless of how ridiculous they may be.. then you’ll hear them argue against their previous points in a future case, because the whole point is to win each case, not to uphold the US constitution.
Also: The obvious common sense question is why did Trump’s defense get Dershowitz to speak on “constitutional law” interpretation instead of getting as actual constitutional scholar? It’s probably because they couldn’t find a constitutional scholar who would be willing to use Dershowitz’s ridiculous constitutional argument and still have a career the next day.
@Gary Logan That definitely was not one of Pres. Clinton's shining moments. But it surrounded trivial personal failing, not disgusting authoritarian-enabling and undercutting what HAD BEEN the American way of govt. checks and balances since its founding.
Jeffrey, simply being respectful as his former tutor was and still talking trash. He must think the audience are fools? Pat on the back excuse was simple embarrassing.
When? He kept getting shut down. Especially when he lied about Trump telling Ukraine president, “we will hold the aid unless you do investigation”. Not one person who was on the phone, president of Ukraine, or transcripts said that. Oh wait, Adam Schiff said it. Schiff that said he was saying what Trump really meant. Hmmmmmm
It's understandable after hearing these people's plan, vision, tactics how Hitler came to the conclusion to exterminate certain factions in his day... it's no wonder they say never again but the world's at the threshold once again,these Zionist lunatics collaborated with Hitler...they were colluded to help kill their own,it was alright with the elite that some of the poor got rounded up in the ghettos...they dared even ridiculed him,the were buying up (like they've) succeeded in America property,media, jewelry store,banking institutions anything that made money...how was the wealth amassed,same pei now(Zionism) controlling Israel & America...
"I WASN'T wrong! I brought up a bunch of 'What if's'!". 'What if' this ASSHAT Dershowitz would go away and never be heard from again?? Like Madonna said: It would be SO nice!
Same argument can be made for the stars of "to catch a predator", maybe they just wanted to spend innocent time with lonely children, never mind they showed other intent that they never did, look what happened to those stars.
They really think American people are idiots, they think they can take their words and tell American people how to think, They seriously need to think again he can not brainwash people who have seen the truth
He wasn't there to talk about the facts, he was there to talk about the interpretation of the Constitution. But I guess a CNN viewer is just too stupid to realize that.
@@andydporter5136 Either you want to be intellectually honest or you don't. If the House Managers make a point of legal theory it is perfectly fine to argue against that point of legal theory. it's not 'obfuscation' for the defense team to rebut the points made by the prosecution. It is obfuscation to complain that he is not talking about the facts when he is RESPONDING to a point of legal theory. It is obfuscation to quote him out of context.
Plenty. During the Jim Crow era in American history. Many Black man got a rope around his neck, and many a white man was acquitted in the fastest "trials" known to humanity.
Did you not see the house impeachment trial? House Democrats didn’t allow any of republicans witnesses. Many of the Democrat already called for impeachment before the trial begin. Are the Democrats and Republicans really impartial?
When Mitch McConnell said he was going to do what Donald Trump told him to do in conducting the impeachment, the presiding judge should have immediately called a halt to the proceedings since the Republicans had basically said they were not going to conduct a proper unbiased impeachment. The senators are in effect jurors. The word juror comes from the word to swear. They swear an oath of office and that includes a duty to conduct an unbiased trial of the person accused in an impeachment. They did not. They said before the trial started that they were not going to. That renders the process of impeachment invalid. They had said they were going to disregard their sworn duty to conduct an unbiased impeachment process. It would be like a foreman of a jury telling the judge before the trial began that the jury were going to ask the defendant what they should do and to follow his instructions to acquit him. If any judge heard that he would immediatley declare the trial process invalid. This was a flagrant violation of the duty of members of the senate to uphold the constitution of the United States and of the chief justice to fullfil his duty to uphold it also. .
Dershowitz used filibuster approach; basically longwinded machine-gun sentences that ate up the clock, on a limited time discussion. The others let him get away with it, but could've said, "Wait! It's my turn to talk now."
@@thediddymen1408 left paints the right the same way the right paints the left. Both are wrong and designed to get you to hate your fellow Americans. Snap outta it. Show some respect and talk to the man. They have divided us and are currently conquering us.
Sohrab Tabrizi: So you agree with what the Republican senators are doing here ? Having a trial but not allowing any witnesses or evidence to be heard or shown !! The President has engaged in illegal activity and the Dems are trying to rightly prosecute him for it, How is that wrong?? What the Republicans are doing is coming up with ridiculous arguments, distractions, spin to try and pretend he did nothing wrong when they all know he did ! I'm not Democrat or Republican but having a trial with no witnesses and not allowing evidence is not a democracy and not American, it's a dictatorship and something you see in Russia, China, North Korea and leads to a dangerous president for the future... I would be saying exactly the same if this were the Democrats doing this...….
@@virgorising7388 1. I was commenting about Dershowitz because he talks in circles and is full of shit. Dershowitz spent a lot of time with Epstein and actually said he got massages from young girls but didn't take his underwear off. 2. Undergarments? What are you 80? Translation not up to par? Dumbass.
Facts are the Hunter Biden was on the payroll of a corrupt company and Biden fired the prosecutor who was investigating said company only to get it closed by a "SOLID" guy.
@@heyzeus9027 How the hell could Biden fire a prosecutor in a foreign country? Everyone in the world wanted that corrupt clown gone and he was fired by his own government.
@@Tsalinger How dare you try to correct a misleading far-right talking point for the 1,000th time and think it will "get through"? Ba dum. bum (And sadly it's not "ha ha" funny)
@@heyzeus9027 who cares about Biden? If Biden is so corrupt why doesn't Barr charge him? He certainly has the authority to do so. Nothing happened to Biden so what's the point of bringing him up? Lol you're reaching, we don't like Biden anyway I hope they get him on something but you're still reaching
"15 senators - okay maybe that's an exaggeration - certainly a "handful'" "I deliberately wasn't talking about the actual facts" fwiw, dershowitz has pushed out more than a dozen "think pieces" in last five months why the US's 'age of consent' laws aren't what HE thinks it SHOULD be
Dershowitz name go down the tube to make "baby argument" by denied all the fact! "Mama, I did not have the candy, I swallowed it in my stomach already" LOL!
"I deliberately did not talk about the facts" Dude....WHAT?
Right, because he's talking about the constitution.
Game over
Trump defense team was just handed this memo from 1999
It just destroyed the Democrats case for impeachment witnesses.
Shocking!
POLITICO~ Biden argued ‘against’ witnesses in 1999 impeachment trial!
01/30/2020 08:36 PM
“In January 1999, then-Sen. Joe Biden argued strongly against the need to depose additional witnesses or seek new evidence in a memo sent to fellow Democrats ahead of President Bill Clinton’s impeachment trial.”
GAME OVER!
Checkmate!
An innocent man who tries so hard to not validate himself
DA7545 nuance isn’t his strong suit apparently
@UC2-TQfOjcl6sBGZ7kx1eEeg "Windmills cause cancer"
The examples he gives aren’t comparable. His examples don’t bring other countries into our elections.
Untethered Investigating corruption is not a reason for impeachment it’s a reason for re-election. Trump will win in 2020. Trump will appoint at least two more Supreme Court justices. Trump + America =Greatness.
@@Outdoorsguy1212 I am always fascinated by people like you, who feel the urge to display their ignorance to the world.
J K Yes, investigating corruption is good. But if T felt the need for an investigation, he should have requested it from the appropriate people in our own country instead of bringing a leader from another country into our elections-among other things.
Your comment abt other countries and our elections didn't age well. :)
Dershowitz has lost all credibility as far as I'm concerned...
And me too, for what it matters.
The entire Trump Administration and Trump's legal team has lost all credibility.
@@ladellp5135 Agreed.
@Trump 2020 Thanks for the insight
James Clark Nobody cares what you think. Facts matter. The fact is Trump is going to get re-elected in 2020 and America is going to have 4 more great years!!!
When you unresonably hate someone, everything they do has an evil intent.
Dershowitz spin on a trump rule: What you're seeing and what you're hearing from me is not what you saw and heard from me
Xcris crosX sounds like trump. Deny deny deny
@Sebastian Volland If I'm a kid you must be at least 125 years old and talking from the grave. Move on down
@Sebastian Volland In your mind only. The vast majority of Americans overwhelming wanted witnesses and documents.
It is very clear to me from the comments from the very few CNN viewers that are left: you do not really want to hear ANY reasoning that conflicts with your own, AND you will go IMMEDIATELY to ad hominem attacks. Shallow. Abuse of power and especially, "obstruction of Congress" (which is, BY THE WAY, the Constitutional prerogative, if not MANDATE of each of the 3 Branches AGAINST each other), are not impeachable, and are not high crimes or treasonous.
You full of it. I watched the whole hearing. I watch every hearing. Everyone heard and fully comprehend what he was saying. As a matter fact the both parties where talking hypothetically. Every understood. CNN and the house managers just spin it their own way. Don't only base your opinion on his response. Listen to the question and also listen to the house managers.
I feel sorry for his wife, I bet she has never won a argument at home.
excellent lol
Yeah gas-lighting is intolerable
🤣🤣🤣
He's always more correct now 😉
More likely just the opposite.
Dude kept Epstein out of jail for a decade now he’s Trumps lawyer. 😂
Don't forget he was OJ Simpson's lawyer to. Also as far as epstein goes mr. Alan douchebag kept his panties on
He the Devil's Advocate
Lmao Trump is not Epstein dummy! Epstein was a criminal, why aren't you saying anything about who Epstein was running with, they get a pass? U fools are like a bunch of Nazis who just make up propaganda and that's it the accused are guilty, end of story,if u want to live like that move to North Korea!
Adam Brooks you see the thing is we can’t be Nazis because Trump doesn’t like us
@Gidget Trevathon HALF OF YOUR CHEESEBALL'S ADMINISTRATION IS IN JAIL. WE HAVE NEVER HAD A PRESIDENT WHERE HALF OF HIS ADMINISTRATION IS IN JAIL. WE HAVE NEVER HAD A BLOODY PRESIDENT WHO SIDES WITH RUSSIA OVER IS INTELLIGENCE. You're a disgrace to this land, to your family and to existence in general
He’s confusing himself 😂🤦🏽♂️
Dersherwitz synonyms- slimy, scummy
4:30 wtf is he talking about, I honestly am lost here
Try to keep up
@@7XHARDER Because you don't understand the Constitution
@@VS-rg4by But he's a Democrat and you know all Dems are above the law
The point isn’t whether he had politically motivated intent as much as whether he extorted our ally while giving aid to our enemy.
Democrats desperately trying to polish their impeachment turd.
Uuuum I wonder why the sale of Javelin Missiles was approved by Trump and not Obama. The hold on aid never impeded the Javelin Missile supply. Oh dear you've been swallowing too many Democrat "facts"
Replace Trump with Obama and listen to the GOP and President’s legal counsel try to defend Obama - or not!
That's what I'm always challenging tRumpsters to do, and all I ever get is a wall of crickets. The one time a tRumpster gave me a non-answer and challenged me to do the reverse, I said "sure, I'd support tRump if he passed clean water laws, clean air laws, protected our parks and monuments, protected our national forests, protected our coastlines from oil drilling....." After that, I got the traditional crickets.
They wanted to Impeach Obama for his Creame suit and his wife wearing a short sleeve dress (which they than found Jackey Kennedy wearing the same thing).
you can youtube Obama creame suit outrage for the FoX news Coverage.... what a scandal right?
Dershowits should walk away and tend to his mind which is gone and out of touch with reality.
Bad news
Trump defense team was just handed this memo from 1999
It just destroyed the Democrats case for impeachment witnesses.
Shocking!
POLITICO~ Biden argued ‘against’ witnesses in 1999 impeachment trial!
01/30/2020 08:36 PM
“In January 1999, then-Sen. Joe Biden argued strongly against the need to depose additional witnesses or seek new evidence in a memo sent to fellow Democrats ahead of President Bill Clinton’s impeachment trial.”
GAME OVER!
Checkmate!
I wonder if he gets debarred for this little episode.
Allen D "Every pedophile I know believes his erection is in the public interest and therefore can not commit a crime!"
@@mattgaetzcongressman2290
Additional witnesses weren't needed. Clinton was already busted. Game over...
This man can turn a lie around with his twisted mouth and make it sound like it's the truth
No wonder they hired him he forgets his own words. I never saw a group of Lawyer ignore the truth or what's right this is why the United States of America is so divided ppl like them who munipulate the system.
Don't listen to what I say, I will tell you what I said.
Lol what
Exactly. I saw his whole argument in his own words from his own mouth. Now he's saying he didn't say it.
Btw, Kirt Vonnegut is one of my favorite authors, Kilgore Trout is probably his best character. :)
I listened to his entire statement. He did say it.
Walter Godsoe I heard him too and was flabbergasted
I say through the whole thing.
Me too
Alan Dershowitz: “I didn’t say the words that came out of my mouth!”
Exactly
Ruirodtube are you that stupid - pay attention - or is it over your head
Sharyn Cas Quit defending the indefensible. Trump is corrupt and Allen is spinning his corruption into another republican alternate reality
"Every one of you wants to be above the law" is his argument to the senators.
Reason why you shouldn't take Alan serious: He defended and justified Jeffrey Epstein and O.J. Sampson
Frank King Sampson?
IDIOT
@Gonzo Kaporal I really don't understand why people are even taking this crazy ass argument seriously. So this is where we are, president is now king! Hate to see how all this flips when a different party is on office
Oh please O.J Simpson was fairly tried in a Court of law, why does the racist LAPD Detective Mark Furhman get a pass? Planting evidence, which throws the accused case out in the trash! Justice idiot!
God, you're stupid.
Trump always involves someone else when he’s in trouble he wants you to concentrate on them not him think about it 🤔
Hector Leos He’s not in trouble. He thinks you liberal pukes are a joke.
And that's exactly what Dershowitz is doing. With Trump, it's always everybody else who is out of step, not him. Now we have Alan Underwear trying to do the same.
J K Your right he isn’t in trouble because all of his spineless GOP toadies in the senate won’t l defend the constitution.
@@Outdoorsguy1212 it's funny that Trump calls anyone a joke, seeing as world leaders constantly laugh at him
@@Outdoorsguy1212 but your the puke and joke inbred. Common sense is free and you still missed it. If your president was such and innocent man and had a perfect call why not let all witnesses testify? It's only one real answer even for ignorant inbreds as your self.
Dershowitz has COMPLETELY lost it. What a way to end a career.
dutchpy dutchpy
I think he is Purposely throwing this “defense” in the trash. As a final of yours to the Republicans.
BOth him and Rudy have sold their souls and once respected careers.
dutchpy dutchpy ,I hope he got his underwear on
You are fools, Dershowitz will be studied for generations as a genius try to debate with idiots.
Yea, I totally agree, whoever thought it was "ok" to have this pathological liar represented by another professional liar who should be retired and, has nothing to lose. He is one foot in the grave, and his kids and grand kids are set for life. it doesn't matter what happens in this trail to him, he does not give a rats ass.
This is the day US democracy (what was left of it) died.
$$$$$ seems the new democracy in usa..
Good. My rights are not up to your vote.
Dramatic much
Only to insane people. TDS, for which apparently THERE IS NO CURE.
This man just said he didn’t say exactly what he said! 😂.
Sure Alan. Just like OJ was innocent right?
Epstein too.
Yep, just like, "My underwear was on so you must be wrong"???
He was imbecile,how can one man kills two people at the same time? One waiitei until he finished killing the other one?
Ralph Hester - You don't think someone can kill two people at the same time?
@@bovineone2420 with a gun yes, with a knife...what one the one doing while he's sticking the other? fixing a sandwich...
This old dude is literally saying C-SPAN took him out of context... this is all a joke.
protectbodythetans 🤣🤣🤣
Old Dude ? This "Old Dude" is a Constitution Law Professor , his Students sit on the Supreme Court as well as Federal Judges Across this Nation . Boobin Toobin and Wolf head blitzer are lower than whale sh!t . #CnnSucks
I love his answers.. What you heard me say is not what you heard me say. I never said what that video shows me saying. Priceless 👌
Those tactics got his client impeached ... So he's trying it now lol
@Russ C great minds think alike lol .. Regarding you and me !!!!!
@Russ C exactly!
What you say, Willis?
The whistleblower is Adam Schiff daughter boyfriend.
Just click on the link and stroll down.
mobile.twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1222666659892207616
0:16 "I don't believe I have never said" we have a double negative here so Alan is saying that he did say what he said lol
Alan is supposed to be an "academic" lol
Even scholars get their words mixed up when they are angry. You'd be angry too if a massive news network had been putting words in your mouth all day long.
Dershowitz's reasoning is as reliable as bamboo scaffolding.
Careful, bamboo scaffolding is awesome.
@@larrybaby9377 Looks great . Until it collapses. Like Dershowitz's arguments.
I think the student has surpassed the the teacher...
You got to be kidding me!!!! Ain't no way in hell that Jeffrey Toobin schooled Alan Dershowitz. Jeffrey Toobin is a CNN biased stooge. Who gets paid to be anti-Trump, and Anti-Republican.
@@mcwhitela2 Atleast Toobin makes sense when he talks. Dersh just talks in circles and contradicts himself everytime he speaks.
You win. 😆
@@mikewazz8986 He makes perfect sense to me. I guess when you have an open mind, shit just make sense. Most of you people just ain't trying to understand him just because he's defending Trump. #Smh #Sad
@Daniel Chen dersh is 81 years old. i'm not getting any younger myself, but i am getting ~seriously~ sick of the ancient privileged white guy take on how sh*t should be run. they clearly have no real life or they would retire and enjoy all that cash they've stacked up... but all they care about is ~power~.
"I deliberately did not talk about the facts" -Alan Dershowitz
Arthur Kroulik are you congenitally or willfully stupid?
@Arthur Kroulik
Arthur Kroulik From witch garbage can they pull you out you dripping garbage
The democRATS were not talking about the facts either. They don't have any facts.
To be fair, thats not necessarily something bad. It just means he spoke about something else, like the motive or the legality of the case. Now, with that said, I think he's a twofaced idiot that think this is a good opportunity for a legacy or something. But in reality it will only further tarnish his legacy.
Can we all agree if Alan dershowitz is your lawyer that you are guilty and vice versa
@Eric Graham think independently. This is the USA. Built on freedom. Go to Russia. Come on you sound ridiculous
@@DMDCineAttic you may just be right..Russian bot. They want to further divide us..sad
"I didn´t say what i said", Man where did i hear that before!?
Off course he said it and it wasn´t a reply to the House Managers or a question from Democrats. He allready answered that question and than went on with his charade!
If Hogwarts were a law school you know who'd be teaching the 'Dark Arts'.
Andy Porter yeah, Anderson cooper lol
Hey Andy, whats it like to lose over and over and over again?
😂🤣😅😅😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣 💯
[9
Alan Dershowitz, Harvard Law professor: "I got a massage at epstein's island but *I DID NOT TAKE MY UNDERWEAR OFF*" .... Now he's helping the President get away with treason.
This is what we've come to. May God help us all.
Dershowitz is being blackmailed
@@pkacc1
G'day,
That could be a perspicacious observation, thankee ; I be much obliged.
Have a good one.
;-p
Ciao !
Peter that’s actually true. He didn’t take off his underwear. The underage girl massaging him did.
True, but please spare my poor tired brain with a visual that I will not be able to erase from my mind until the day I die and my thought processes cease. It's not fair that my mind should be haunted until that day. Bottom line, people are the company they keep, birds of a feather always flock together. The common knowledge of Doucheowitz behavior and proclivities for underaged teens is without doubt. He knows he can keep denying such as long as Epstein is dead and there is no chance of any evidence coming forth. I have no doubt that there is video evidence of Doucheowitz engaged in illegal inappropriate sexual activities with underaged girls that would confirm his pedophilia. But as long as Epstein's estate has possession of that evidence, it will remain hidden. Yet, we all know that there is no way anyone, male or female, who would physically touch that gross, balding old wrinkled, bad breathed, out of shaped 80 year old desperate perv unless they were being paid the kind of money that Jeffrey Epstein had access to, no eff'in way, not on your life.
Peter what does that have to do with Alan’s point...divert from the truth , poor attempt
This Alan old man is insane
he is the guy saying other scholars have contradicted themselves in relation to impeachment on political bias, but hes actually the guy who said something different when clinton was under impeachment, and then turn 180 when trump is under impeachment..he doesnt even need to tell us he did not vote for trump, because his motives are already questionable
Not insane. Purely corrupt.
@INTHEPAC - quit with the partisan politics. It's exactly what's fucking up this country.
Also, this lawyer is defending a Republican president and the senators who support him. So there's no legs to your jab.
@ALON ZADOK Alan established that he was correct when he said that you don't need a crime to impeach a president, yet he said at the same time that he's much MORE CORRECT when he says that you NEED a crime to impeach a president. That's the definition of insane.
He “didn’t talk about the facts?” Maybe he should. Seriously....
David Mc Goddamn!! The Irony.. it’s pathetic... you people would turn on your family for Trump
......that just sounds too much like right......
dersh says he wasn't there as one of trump's lawyers. he says he was a nonpartison fact witness. hey.... the repubs had a witness, so now bring in bolton as a witness for the dems.
@David Mc yea, keep listening to Trump. That's where you'll get the truth from🤦🏻♂️
When Trump said, "I could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and I wouldn't lose any votes" he wasn't calling you guys loyal, he was calling you stupid
@David Mc what would you tell a family if they hated trump?
Dershowitz: "I have no political bias". This is the non-bias bias.
I don't ever again want to hear from Mr. Dershowitz about ANYTHING EVER AGAIN!!!!
This makes no sense , I don’t think you have to be a scholar to realize this doesn’t make sense.
Ali Yusuf he is full of 💩
Ali Yusef.
It does when you take into consideration that Dershowitz went full blown Zionist more than a decade ago and is in Netanyahu's back pocket.
@@seanbrennan9188 That's what happened -- Dershowitz is a Zionist serving the interests of Netanyahu. Dershowitz even acknowledged it in so many words, when he explained his motivation for serving as a defense lawyer (during the impeachment).
Hey. R u SS?
you are an idiot!
Constitutional scholars of the country need to state strongly how absurd trump's defendants' Constitutional "argument" is.
it won't matter to the base/cult. They are all in with this crooked President and don't care how criminal Trump is
Dumb!! The left’s, Dems, and CNN’s agenda and opinion!!
Everything every politician has ever done was done to prove that it was in the public's best interest to keep them in power.
@@shoichleach74callum7 It's only a battle, not the whole war - you never know what the deciding will be.
@@QuantumOfSolace1 Yes, you are Dumb!!
Dershowitz needs to lose his law license.
Gonzo Kaporal Maybe in your country. Here in The United States we are a representative government and we don’t do disbar attorneys for arguing a case.
Darlene Farmer: Is Dershowitz too smart for your lefty twisted mind?
CD Smith His misunderstanding of the law makes him unfit to practice.
Dershowitz has many regrets for passing his student.
His hypothetical argument falls flat. Even if you give him “If a President has a small upside politically to his re-election then it can’t be an impeachable quid pro quo” Both his arguments visa vis both Obama and Biden don’t impact the electability of someone else. That’s an important distinction. If Obama decides against striking Syria because it would have political downside is very different than a President using his power and intercepting a transaction to adversely effect the electability of someone else. One instance contains self interest and the other has detrimental damages to another party.
he would likely try and argue every and any action can have intended or unintended consequences for this opposition like a butterfly effect.
His reasoning is sound, but its just simply too loose and forgiving. What Deroshowitz forgot is that he is not arguing in favor of the SPIRIT OF THE LAW.
Ths guy is nuts! He is claiming he didnt say what he actually said!
Like the orange turd.
I feel like I'm on the Truman show. This is just so ridiculous
Remember his massage with his buddy Epstein
@@sunnylilme It's hard not to conclude that Dersh has been compromised, just like graham and Cruz and others. Their support of Trump goes far beyond being partisan. They aer openly supporting illegal acts that damage the country, undermine the consitution and effectively grant the incoming Dem president UNLIMITED POWER.
Rosalie Bent We all say things we didn’t say
This is what Dershowitz is choosing to end his career on. Baffling to say the least. I seriously wonder what they have on him.
protectbodythetans He’s implicated in Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes. Trump could be threatening him with prosecution through William Barr. You can’t put it past these crooks.
Epstein stuff!
Epstein.
@@mrspiff6955
I'll bet anything that Epstein had hidden cameras in every room. Someone's got the goods on a lot of powerful people.
I can't imagine any good reason why Dershowitz (and a whole lot of others) would be making such a complete ass of himself for Trump otherwise.
protectbodythetans He knows a winner win he sees one?
So, Alan can say the end justifies the means, then he can come back and say he's taken out of context.
Deliberate misrepresentation of his argument
He just switches his views on the law with every new case he has to defend.
How do you define corrupt? 1. Dershowitz 2. Trump 3. Sekulow 4. Graham etc. etc.
This professor is a joke, I've never heard so much double-talk in my entire life is what I've seen and heard here. Only in the US huh
Will Cochran ... and he's a Harvard law professor? Shameful. I would be announcing his early retirement if I was running Harvard front office.
@@McQuokka Well he only became a Harvard law professor at the age of 28, but it's clear your partisan mind knows a lot more.
Like you know shit. Haha
Will Cochran Professor Irwin Corey
Dolphin Man ...maybe once he was an informed academic. Unfortunately he is now a laughing stock of all academia irregardless of your political bias. Sometimes retirement should be forced upon so-called professors of the Harvard Old Boys Club. C'mon now, be honest, he's made a complete fool of himself. Then he tries to unravel it back and he got owned by a former student. There's a reason he's back in Florida, and its not because he had a "fanily thing". 😆. If he cared that much about the constitution he would have stayed until the bitter end to argue his point. He knows he fucked up, he ran back down to where he should stay permanently with all the other cronies (FL) with his tail between his legs. But, like all lawyers, he can't ever admit he was wrong and so comes back on CNN and tries to defend himself by talking over others and interrupting those who point out his lunacy...and repeatedly makes a big point abou where his politics lie and even states who he voted for. A closet Trumper if ever there was one Alan. You're not fooling anyone. #HarvardfireAlan
*No wonder people are discussed at mainstream news*
WHY DO YOU GIVE HIM SO MUCH FREEDOM TO TALK BUT DON'T CALL HIM OUT ON ANYTHING!!!!
That's wolf Blitzer for you
Mr. I kept my underwear on while teenager Virginia Roberts massaged me.
Why just let him keep talking over you like that? He’s not even listening to anything Tobin is saying
Let’s not talk about the facts, that’s classic!!
Sadly, that's the preface for most GOP arguments!
Well, I heard what he said. Now he says he didn't say what he did.
Bojana Albahari So?
Alan Dershowitz’s defense of Trump in the Senate impeachment trial, according to Harvard Law professor Laurence Tribe: “Alan is completely wacko on this.”
Agreed!! ❤.¸☆ ★☆¸.•°*”˜˜ღ...
Well to be fair, and I love professor tribe's enthusiasm, but that's calling the kettle black. It might be best if both these professors continue the debate on campus where semantics can be fine tuned. The public needs real life answers.
@Trump 2020: A science writer with a PhD in neuroscience named Bobby Azarian has laid out why Trump supporters (and a lot of Republicans in general) are so quick to fall in line with politicians like Trump who are clearly charlatans. He identifies five different common traits that we see in these die hard supporters, and they are each more disturbing as the list goes on. Ring of Fire’s Farron Cousins discusses this:1) Authoritarian Personality Syndrome
2) Social Dominance Orientation
3) Prejudice
4) Intergroup Contact
5) Deprivation
@Trump 2020 are u nuts .he said he's not part of the defence team but he's on there team .they wanted him to stay as he said they begged him to stay .he sayes he is not on Trump's defence team but he is .let's see if he would of said the founding fathers would of wanted to get to the truth I bet he wouldn't be with that fake Christian and phony Jay sekulow defence team .also isn't there a tape of him in 1998 saying impeachmeant is whatever the house and Congress say it is .him talking about what other law professors have said when he said that in 1998 .oh and by the way Trump is going to get beat bad in the election all this did is make people more upset with these disgracefull Republicans and make people even want to vote him out more .thanks Republicans for saying you can have a trial with no witnesses and making sure this one time experiment as a president will be a one term president on election night by the people of this country .I can't wait to see Kelly Ann and Trump's face when they lose the election .plus great job to the Lincoln project
"I deliberately did not talk about the facts".
When you deliberately avoid arguing the facts and instead choose to predicate your argument on a slew of obscure hypotheticals, it speaks volumes about the merits of your argument and calls into question your personal motives.
great comment! @theinfamous
Catharine Dupuis He isn’t a constitutional scholar he’s a defense attorney, which is why he followed the typical defense attorney blueprint: When you can’t disprove the facts simply ignored them and focus on hypotheticals. It is a defense attorney’s job to come up with a defense even when they know that their client is guilty.
Also: Dershowitz was just on CNN contradicting himself again...agreeing that a president can be impeached for abuse of power and he even used Nixon as an example.
Another one who doesn't grasp context. No, they were not talking about the specific facts of the Trump case. They were speaking in general and hypothetical terms about what kind of motive is impeachable.
Anthony Iuculano So pressuring a foreign government to interfere in an upcoming US election isn’t impeachable but lying about getting a blowjob is? Also based on what Dershowitz argued yesterday on the senate floor nothing is impeachable. But of course he told a different story today on CNN. But again, that’s a defense attorney’s job, to present arguments in favor of their clients regardless of how ridiculous they may be.. then you’ll hear them argue against their previous points in a future case, because the whole point is to win each case, not to uphold the US constitution.
Also: The obvious common sense question is why did Trump’s defense get Dershowitz to speak on “constitutional law” interpretation instead of getting as actual constitutional scholar? It’s probably because they couldn’t find a constitutional scholar who would be willing to use Dershowitz’s ridiculous constitutional argument and still have a career the next day.
It's painfully clear from this interview that Dershowitz is completely off his rocker. #dimentia
Democrats are desperately trying to polish their impeachment Turd!
Dershowitz, at this sad, disgusting time of his existence: "Those are my words but that's not what I said."
wow! Al SMOKED the whole crew of fake news CNN!
@@TheWhatthefuck12 Pfffftt. Yeah, sure. I wonder what you're "smoking"...
@Gary Logan That definitely was not one of Pres. Clinton's shining moments. But it surrounded trivial personal failing, not disgusting authoritarian-enabling and undercutting what HAD BEEN the American way of govt. checks and balances since its founding.
Feel sorry for his students! He will disagree with a two years old
Ro Ramos i would too, 2 year olds are dumb and usually wrong
I should have went to Law School...missed out on all that corrupt $$$.
@satterwhite I wish I had also
So he's trying to say "hey we are all a little corrupt right? so it's ok" Not a good argument.
So then doesn't it make it imperative to hear from the people who could answer the question to the president's intent?
Jeffrey, simply being respectful as his former tutor was and still talking trash. He must think the audience are fools?
Pat on the back excuse was simple embarrassing.
When the student schools the professor...
The student, not just mastered his teacher, but wrecked him from within.
";-)
😂😂😂 he murked him lol
TONY CNN’s brought in their hired gun
When? He kept getting shut down. Especially when he lied about Trump telling Ukraine president, “we will hold the aid unless you do investigation”. Not one person who was on the phone, president of Ukraine, or transcripts said that. Oh wait, Adam Schiff said it. Schiff that said he was saying what Trump really meant. Hmmmmmm
Dershowitz: "I deliberately didn't talk about the facts." Well yeah. ..
It's understandable after hearing these people's plan, vision, tactics how Hitler came to the conclusion to exterminate certain factions in his day... it's no wonder they say never again but the world's at the threshold once again,these Zionist lunatics collaborated with Hitler...they were colluded to help kill their own,it was alright with the elite that some of the poor got rounded up in the ghettos...they dared even ridiculed him,the were buying up (like they've) succeeded in America property,media, jewelry store,banking institutions anything that made money...how was the wealth amassed,same pei now(Zionism) controlling Israel & America...
The old "baffle 'em with bullshit" legal defense... The perfect defense for perpetual Liar-in-Chief Donald Trump.
Domino EP he full of it
Stop giving Dershowitz time on your show
"I WASN'T wrong! I brought up a bunch of 'What if's'!". 'What if' this ASSHAT Dershowitz would go away and never be heard from again?? Like Madonna said: It would be SO nice!
Except that’s exactly what you said!!!!
If a lawyer has to come up with three crazy arguments in a row that means they have no argument
Faaaaactsss
Actually it just means he's surrounded by morons
The only person who understands Dershowitz is Dershowitz, i think.
Same argument can be made for the stars of "to catch a predator", maybe they just wanted to spend innocent time with lonely children, never mind they showed other intent that they never did, look what happened to those stars.
except they have factual evidence via social media transcripts, so your analogy doesn't make sense at all.
They really think American people are idiots, they think they can take their words and tell American people how to think, They seriously need to think again he can not brainwash people who have seen the truth
I didn't talk about the facts, I talked about a hypothetical....DISGUSTING!!!!
He wasn't there to talk about the facts, he was there to talk about the interpretation of the Constitution. But I guess a CNN viewer is just too stupid to realize that.
DanLewis then he shouldn’t have been there to speak in the first place. But I don’t expect an always trumptard to have some logic to reality.
“I wasn’t talking about the facts!”
-Derschuwitz
Crystal M He means he was talking abstractly about legal principles, not about any specific facts
Classic taking quote out of context. I wasn't talking about the facts, I was responding to a POINT OF LEGAL THEORY made by the HOUSE MANAGERS.
@@moshemo613 Yes, obfuscate the trial with abstract points of legal theory. Way to go Alan. Anything rather than acknowledge the facts of the case.
@@andydporter5136 Either you want to be intellectually honest or you don't. If the House Managers make a point of legal theory it is perfectly fine to argue against that point of legal theory. it's not 'obfuscation' for the defense team to rebut the points made by the prosecution.
It is obfuscation to complain that he is not talking about the facts when he is RESPONDING to a point of legal theory.
It is obfuscation to quote him out of context.
I wasn't talking about the facts wooooooow 🤯🤦🏾♂️
Dershowitz, go back and learned something from your ex student.
Has there ever been a trial without witnesses & documentation‽
🧕🏽₲ɾɑղԵ𓃹 - Yes. Plenty of them. Especially in the military.
Yes, they just did one in the house. Trump had ZERO witnesses.
Plenty. During the Jim Crow era in American history. Many Black man got a rope around his neck, and many a white man was acquitted in the fastest "trials" known to humanity.
Did you not see the house impeachment trial? House Democrats didn’t allow any of republicans witnesses. Many of the Democrat already called for impeachment before the trial begin. Are the Democrats and Republicans really impartial?
@@triplebbb1484 Wow. Now that makes me look at both parties differently.
5:33
I deliberately wasn't talking about the facts
Lol
When Mitch McConnell said he was going to do what Donald Trump told him to do in conducting the impeachment, the presiding judge should have immediately called a halt to the proceedings since the Republicans had basically said they were not going to conduct a proper unbiased impeachment. The senators are in effect jurors. The word juror comes from the word to swear. They swear an oath of office and that includes a duty to conduct an unbiased trial of the person accused in an impeachment. They did not. They said before the trial started that they were not going to. That renders the process of impeachment invalid. They had said they were going to disregard their sworn duty to conduct an unbiased impeachment process. It would be like a foreman of a jury telling the judge before the trial began that the jury were going to ask the defendant what they should do and to follow his instructions to acquit him. If any judge heard that he would immediatley declare the trial process invalid. This was a flagrant violation of the duty of members of the senate to uphold the constitution of the United States and of the chief justice to fullfil his duty to uphold it also. .
"What if, what if..." Ridiculous.
The GOP has my head spinning
I watch it today and Trump's lawyer's said nothing but ' give Trump a free pass ' and a headache
Right! It’s hard to listen to any of them because they make no sense.
"... I'm not talking about the facts. I'm talking about the Constitution." -Professor- Pervshoitz has gone and lost his goddam mind!!
I think he has a medical condition or the Epstein issue is hanging over his head and he knows who is aware of his ties.
CNN are desperately trying to polish their Impeachment Turd.
Judge: "Shall we hear from witness testimony to testify that the murderer murdered his murdered victims?"
GOP: No.
America died.
Supreme arrogance- pity his class students
He needs to be shown a video of his own words
Spock The Builder he might say it wasn't him
"You didn't show the part I said 3 hours prior, therefore this is taken out of context."
"I deliberately did not talk about the fact" hmmm
Be Rt “And that’s a fact.”
If you let him continue to talk.
He will cause ringing in your ears.
Dershowitz used filibuster approach; basically longwinded machine-gun sentences that ate up the clock, on a limited time discussion. The others let him get away with it, but could've said, "Wait! It's my turn to talk now."
John Webb: Not just ringing !!...………. These Republicans are starting to make my ears blead every time I listen to them...……..
@@thediddymen1408 left paints the right the same way the right paints the left. Both are wrong and designed to get you to hate your fellow Americans. Snap outta it. Show some respect and talk to the man. They have divided us and are currently conquering us.
Sohrab Tabrizi: So you agree with what the Republican senators are doing here ? Having a trial but not allowing any witnesses or evidence to be heard or shown !! The President has engaged in illegal activity and the Dems are trying to rightly prosecute him for it, How is that wrong?? What the Republicans are doing is coming up with ridiculous arguments, distractions, spin to try and pretend he did nothing wrong when they all know he did ! I'm not Democrat or Republican but having a trial with no witnesses and not allowing evidence is not a democracy and not American, it's a dictatorship and something you see in Russia, China, North Korea and leads to a dangerous president for the future... I would be saying exactly the same if this were the Democrats doing this...….
The bells have been gonging for 3 years now
Dersho just talks over Toobin all the time and then claims victory... Talking the loudest doesn't make you the smartest, it just makes you a bully.
Der is protesting a little too strongly, I think
He's full of it he's PAID
Dershowitz better eat a snickers bar , he’s starting to sound like Rudy .
Yep. He actually sounds intelligent...unlike Schiff, Nadler, Jeffries, Lofgren, Demings, Crow, and Garcia.
" I didn't talk about the facts " LOL......LOL .
😂
Purposefully
"I'm not politically biased but everyone who doesn't think like I do is!!" But at least he keeps his underwear on right?
These comments are all I need to convince me Trumps going to win in 2020. How do you manage to put your undergarments on at all.
@@virgorising7388 1. I was commenting about Dershowitz because he talks in circles and is full of shit. Dershowitz spent a lot of time with Epstein and actually said he got massages from young girls but didn't take his underwear off.
2. Undergarments? What are you 80? Translation not up to par?
Dumbass.
over 20 months, dershowitz wrote more than a dozen "think pieces" about what the age of consent SHOULD be.
I haven't seen one since epstein died.
“How do you define corrupt”? One word : Trump
Almost time to start dragging these criminals into the street.
OG Steele bring it on
Well over due
@@darrenbraemer6213
A good fascist is a dead fascist fascist
Yes you did
Is Dershowitz senile or what? "I did not talk about the facts..." This guy is a Harvard Law professor?
They can't argue the facts.
This man said that he was not responding to the facts when he made his statement in the chamber.
Facts are the Hunter Biden was on the payroll of a corrupt company and Biden fired the prosecutor who was investigating said company only to get it closed by a "SOLID" guy.
@@heyzeus9027 How the hell could Biden fire a prosecutor in a foreign country? Everyone in the world wanted that corrupt clown gone and he was fired by his own government.
He replaced talking facts with a bunch of "What if?" gibberish. He is SUCH a slimebucket.
@@Tsalinger How dare you try to correct a misleading far-right talking point for the 1,000th time and think it will "get through"? Ba dum. bum (And sadly it's not "ha ha" funny)
@@heyzeus9027 who cares about Biden? If Biden is so corrupt why doesn't Barr charge him? He certainly has the authority to do so. Nothing happened to Biden so what's the point of bringing him up? Lol you're reaching, we don't like Biden anyway I hope they get him on something but you're still reaching
There are no cases where reelection is in the interest of the public, it is always in the interest of themselves!
Mick Mulvaney understands exactly how you feel at this moment, Alan. Just spit the shoe out, buddy.
You said what you said and we believed what you said and you told us that it’s ok for trump to withheld the 400 million
Never before have so many with nothing to hide worked so hard to hide so much.
"15 senators - okay maybe that's an exaggeration - certainly a "handful'"
"I deliberately wasn't talking about the actual facts"
fwiw, dershowitz has pushed out more than a dozen "think pieces" in last five months why the US's 'age of consent' laws aren't what HE thinks it SHOULD be
@P.D. Evans literally none of that is true
This guy should be impeached from TV and admitted to nursing home
Dershowitz name go down the tube to make "baby argument" by denied all the fact! "Mama, I did not have the candy, I swallowed it in my stomach already" LOL!