JBL is twice as powerful and has a really window shaking bass if you have a small apartment. I like Marshall sound , seems to be more clear in mid and high. Marshall needs to build something bigger and stronger with a big subwoofer to beat JBL
Yo peseo u Marshall y un JBL , como decia alguel en comentarios , el marshall no cansa en oido al escuchar todo el dia diferentes estilos de musica , el JBL si cansa depues de un poco tiempo . Para mi gusto el marshall tiene mucho mejor sonido
У меня JBL Authentics 16 долго слушать не получится, излишнее давление на низких, быстро утомляет. А вот был Маршал Tufton хороший звук и при этом на голову не давит
@@luckyhook590 If you need to play music over wifi, the JBL Authenstic 500 has an advantage here. As for the sound, it depends on each person's preference.
@@storytripperhd Thank you for your reply. I agree, I will go to one of the malls to listen to these speakers and then decide which sound I like better.
I see in the comments people saying, JBL is better because it has more power and bass 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 MARSHALL IS NOT FOR BASS, MARSHALL IS NOT FOR POWER, MARSHALL IS FOR UNDISPUTED SOUNDSTAGE AND SOUND SEPARATION. IT IS MEANT FOR LIVE MUSIC ESPECIALLY ROCK, THE GEN Z MUSIC IS FOR BOSE (ARTIFICIALLY ENHANCED). LEAVE MARSHALL ALONE, GET YOUR BASS FIX FROM ALL THE BRANDS YOU WANT.
@@thennekcdcdthennek6417 always remember one thing, artificially created music or artificially created sounds will always die in the end, Marshall speakers are still used in almost all of the concerts worldwide where live music is played, For Justin Bieber and Shakira lip syncing any loud Speaker can do the job, don't even get me started on today's id!ot proof of music. WHEN IT'S ABOUT LIVE MUSIC EVERYBODY WANTS THE SOUNDSTAGE AND SOUND SEPARATION TO BE PERFECTLY DELIVERED. Just FYI the days of real music are back thanks to Greta van fleet, Dirty honey, kaleo, Florence & the Machine. The days are fake music are about to be over, history always repeats buddy always repeats.
JBL is too forced and the Marshall is far more clear and detailed, the JBL has far to much mud muffle and darker sonics in the low end where as the Woburn mids are spotless and balanced. JBL seems to focuses on power with poor quality on sound. Woburn is just superior in my opinion.
Marshall sounds more softly for me. If marshall had had a wifi connection i would have chosen exactly marshall despite having only 1/3 of jbl power. Wonder about a jbl bass potential Upd. Discovered that marshall is 150w, not 90w. It makes choice even harder
You don't understand music or maybe you are just gen z. JBL sounds like a cheap speaker with overdone highs and really really overdone bass. Marshall sounds balanced, the sound separation and the soundstage is amazing on those, you have to listen to both of those right in front of you understand how superior those Marshall speakers are.
![일상 속 기분 좋음 [Proto disco meme]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/DwmEIaZ7XGQ/mqdefault.jpg)
JBL is twice as powerful and has a really window shaking bass if you have a small apartment. I like Marshall sound , seems to be more clear in mid and high. Marshall needs to build something bigger and stronger with a big subwoofer to beat JBL
JBL is slightly better on vocals and treble
Quiero seguir todo el tiempo escuchando el JBL, para mi oído sin dudas es el ganador y favorito
Woburn3 เสียงฟังสบาย ไม่ล้าหู
JBL แน่น หนักไป😂
This one doesn't tire ears, its not like the partybox
For music listening and occasional movies does these speakers are better or those soundbars in these price ranges, which will be better ?
@@rf_wbg it’s a preference thing
เลือก JBL ครับ Smart Home Speaker กันเลยทีเดียว ช่องทางการหาเพลงเปิดดีกว่าเยอะ Tidal Connect ก็สะดวก เลือกอนาคตครับ Dolby Atmos ก็ให้มา ส่วน M ให้ช่องทางน้อยไป น้อยมาก 😂 ลำโพงบ้านไม่เคลื่อนย้ายบ่อย ไม่ห่วงเลยลำโพงวูฟเฟอร์ อีกอย่าง ผมว่าเวทีเสียง JBL ทำได้ดีกว่า
คิดเหมือนกัน
Yo peseo u Marshall y un JBL , como decia alguel en comentarios , el marshall no cansa en oido al escuchar todo el dia diferentes estilos de musica , el JBL si cansa depues de un poco tiempo . Para mi gusto el marshall tiene mucho mejor sonido
У меня JBL Authentics 16 долго слушать не получится, излишнее давление на низких, быстро утомляет. А вот был Маршал Tufton хороший звук и при этом на голову не давит
Не буду менять свой Woburn 2 ни на какой из них..
🤙🏾 Loyalty
จัด authentics 500 มาแล้ว สะดวกมากๆ กับการฟังเพลงด้วย wifi สั่ง google assistant เล่นเพลง ปรับระดับเสึยง เทคโนโลยีดีกว่า
@@NTPCCY รุ่นนี้จุดเด่น คือ เทคโนโลยี การเชื่อมต่อ wifi รองรับคำสั่งเสียง
JBL is killing Marshall on faster speakers and upgraded tech but I find Marshall bass still more pleasing and deeper. Just that one thing!
El JBL tiene más potencia y mayor fuerza de bajos, el Marshall mejor definición en medios y bajos, la guitarra y voces suenan muy bien.
โอเค ฟัง woburn 3 ต่อไป 555 สู้ไม่ได้เรื่องเทคโนโลยีเท่านั้น
Thank you for this comparison. I was thinking about buying one of these speakers, I wasn't sure, now I am.
@@luckyhook590 If you need to play music over wifi, the JBL Authenstic 500 has an advantage here. As for the sound, it depends on each person's preference.
@@storytripperhd Thank you for your reply. I agree, I will go to one of the malls to listen to these speakers and then decide which sound I like better.
I see in the comments people saying, JBL is better because it has more power and bass 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
MARSHALL IS NOT FOR BASS, MARSHALL IS NOT FOR POWER, MARSHALL IS FOR UNDISPUTED SOUNDSTAGE AND SOUND SEPARATION.
IT IS MEANT FOR LIVE MUSIC ESPECIALLY ROCK, THE GEN Z MUSIC IS FOR BOSE (ARTIFICIALLY ENHANCED).
LEAVE MARSHALL ALONE, GET YOUR BASS FIX FROM ALL THE BRANDS YOU WANT.
marshall only sounds good on guitars because they are a guitar amp company trying to save themselves using bt speakers lol
@@thennekcdcdthennek6417 always remember one thing, artificially created music or artificially created sounds will always die in the end, Marshall speakers are still used in almost all of the concerts worldwide where live music is played, For Justin Bieber and Shakira lip syncing any loud Speaker can do the job, don't even get me started on today's id!ot proof of music. WHEN IT'S ABOUT LIVE MUSIC EVERYBODY WANTS THE SOUNDSTAGE AND SOUND SEPARATION TO BE PERFECTLY DELIVERED.
Just FYI the days of real music are back thanks to Greta van fleet, Dirty honey, kaleo, Florence & the Machine. The days are fake music are about to be over, history always repeats buddy always repeats.
My personal opinion. JBL sound much better. I can feel the energy JBL . But Marshall I feel laidback style, feels no motivation.
ใกล้เคียงกัน เลือก M เพราะไม่ชอบตำแหน่งของลำโพงที่อยู่ด้านล่าง ของ J สำหรับผมมันไม่ปลอดภัย
JBL is too forced and the Marshall is far more clear and detailed, the JBL has far to much mud muffle and darker sonics in the low end where as the Woburn mids are spotless and balanced. JBL seems to focuses on power with poor quality on sound. Woburn is just superior in my opinion.
อยากให้พี่เปรียบเทียบ วูเบิน2ปรับEQสุดหมดเทียบกับ วูเบิน3ให้หน่อยครับ
แล้วความดังเสียงละครับ
@@storytripperhd ความดังเสียงเท่าๆกันพี่ เพียงแค่ปรับEQของวูเบิน2ปรับสุดหมดครับ
Marshall sounds more softly for me. If marshall had had a wifi connection i would have chosen exactly marshall despite having only 1/3 of jbl power. Wonder about a jbl bass potential
Upd. Discovered that marshall is 150w, not 90w. It makes choice even harder
Play both at the same time with 100% volume, with different music, thats the real battle 😂
😆😆😆
Marshall Woburn 3 vs Tribit Stompbox Blast please
ไว้มีโอกาสจะจัดให้นะครับ
Wich is the best speaker please.
Marshall is soft and comfortable to listen to. (personal opinion)
@@storytripperhd thank you for the advise.
The JBL sounded more forward and hit a lot harder. The Marshall was more laid back. It just depends on what you like. I preferred the JBL.
지금 연결도 그냥 블루투스 일텐데, 어센틱이 wifi 로 재생하면 월등할듯
เลือก M ของแท้นอก 10000 ส่วน J 27000 หนักไปหน่อย
Woburn III ถ้าเครื่อง เกรดงานช้อป ก็ราคาใกล้เคียงกัน ถ้าราคาหมื่นกว่า ก็เป็นเครื่องนอก เกรดทั่วไป ก็เล่นตามงบ และ ความพอใจ
ซื้อที่ไหนครับแท้นอก 10000 ผมเห็นแต่ของก๊อป
500 win. Brazil.
You don't understand music or maybe you are just gen z. JBL sounds like a cheap speaker with overdone highs and really really overdone bass.
Marshall sounds balanced, the sound separation and the soundstage is amazing on those, you have to listen to both of those right in front of you understand how superior those Marshall speakers are.
Which is better?
Each type is good, depending on your preferences.
good bye marshall
Only 60%volumen 😐😐😐100%?
Woburn 3
jbl어센틱500 이 해상도가 더좋다
워번3 은 상대적으로 음이 탁하다
Only woburn 3 , sound better and pro , jbl sound same cheap speakers
Mer shall
คู่นี้ สูสีกันสุดๆ
只有500贏marshall
jbl 은 소리를 뭉개는 느낌 ....마샬은 소리의 선명도가 뛰어나 소리의 분리가 뛰어남
on this video marschall sounds better
Marshall è più equilibrato come suono, i medio bassi JBL sono un po' troppo avanti, ma con bella equalizzazione credo che la JBL sia più performante
The only REAL Music was the first the rest is NOT music at all
Calm down try hard
Nobody asked about your musical tastes, kid.
@@Luiz.Campos When music is crap is a MUST to say
Eres de los mios @@Kouros-t6d