This is Typhion, primary analyst for the 1968 season. Obviously with a record year there will be some who may question the validity of my analysis, especially with the final ACE bar. Given the many recon gaps and lack of data for some storms (mainly weaker Tropical storms), the ACE could have been lower or even higher than shown here. I had a hard time believing the final number when I was finished myself. But this season shows that there is a lot left to be uncovered in older Typhoon seasons, so look forward to more animated seasons reanalyzed by me and the analysis team in the future!
It is probable that the recon data may have underestimated the actual intensities of the storms listed here. And maybe some storms could still be missing... Though I've wondered what the recon data for these storms do show, though... since there is regular recon flights back then unlike today for WPAC nowadays.
What did we expect with WPAC? I mean, it can be bonkers at times. As for this season, I've heard it may have been underestimated. I am guessing it might be due to recon data being either missing or missed some of the storm's actual intensity... Some storms may not be listed here at all.
I didn't expect that this 1968 Typhoon season to be this hyperactive and with an insanely 587 ACE! What? And 11 super Typhoons and 6 of them are Cat 5 is just wow. And for the record which Typhoon season produces the most Cat 5 and also I'm sorry to say this but I prefer the old landfall animation because the landfall in this video and the 2022-2023 Australia cyclone season is kinder made me fell a little bit of goosebumps unlike that landfall animation of 2017 Atlantic hurricane season where Irma made landfall in the laser antilles made me feel goosebumps.😬
Yeah, I am not sure if this season's influenced by an El Nino like this year, though... But it is probable maybe some storms are missing, and even if they are included, probably some of the storms intensities are higher than indicated due to recon data either is missing or underestimated...
I mean, this is F13's analysis so this is unofficial... But keep in mind, there IS recon data back then like the ATL nowadays, so yet again, maybe most of this could be realized in the future.
@@macchersl6571accumulated Cyclone energy, Its dependent on how strong the storm and its period of time with that intensity. Stronger the storm then more ace will be created. But if it last longer with that very strong intensity then they can create a ton of ace. It’s basically a way of showing on how intense the season was.
I just wanna say this is the highest ace season i guess but idk. For those who dont know and didn't watch the video,the total of this season's ace is 587.This is the underestimating season ever
@@SadElk122 KZC WPR paper showed storm speed, POCI, ROCI, and latitude can all affect winds or pressure. It is not true that only pressure and size are used. IBTRACS has complete information about all those parameters
Fake Irma??? Irma was used for WPAC for a very long time way before Atlantic had a name Irma in their naming list. WPAC even had an Irma with an intensity far greater than Irma of Atlantic
Oh, in the same research paper where Super Typhoon Nora of 1973 was reanalayzed with a windspeed of 181 knots, Irma was reanalyzed with a windspeed of 172 knots, or 197 miles per hour!
This is Typhion, primary analyst for the 1968 season. Obviously with a record year there will be some who may question the validity of my analysis, especially with the final ACE bar. Given the many recon gaps and lack of data for some storms (mainly weaker Tropical storms), the ACE could have been lower or even higher than shown here. I had a hard time believing the final number when I was finished myself. But this season shows that there is a lot left to be uncovered in older Typhoon seasons, so look forward to more animated seasons reanalyzed by me and the analysis team in the future!
Typhion did a great job analysing this season
Good animation bro keep it up
1969 may be another season underestimated by at least 100 ACE units. 1990, 1991, 1971 are all very underestimated
thank you@@SuperTyphoonTracker2003
@@SadElk122that's a whole damn lot for a season
Not sure WHAT I was expecting it definitely wasnt *6 category 5s with 587 ACE!!* 😱
Who knows? Even if this is unofficial today, maybe in the future, most of this could be realized during the WPAC reanalysis project!
.
With the thumbnail, i think it was made by Alex (TSK 2023]
The Thumbnail was… but…
587 ACE is CRAZY... 1997 only had 567
Probably one day this may be realized once the WPAC reanalysis project gets up to speed... Though for now, it is unofficial analysis.
Possibly the most underestimated season of WPAC. May have been underestimated by at least 140 ACE units (ranges from 140 - 190 ACE units deviation)
It is probable that the recon data may have underestimated the actual intensities of the storms listed here. And maybe some storms could still be missing... Though I've wondered what the recon data for these storms do show, though... since there is regular recon flights back then unlike today for WPAC nowadays.
@@SadElk122 by how much is it underestimated?
@@SadElk122 How?
1971 might take the title as the most underestimated season.
@@SadElk122 What was you Named storm count for the season?
587 ACE💀 What the hell is happening. This season becomes hyperactive holy Jesus
Yea so hyper active I was chatting on the live chat. It was crazy.
What did we expect with WPAC? I mean, it can be bonkers at times. As for this season, I've heard it may have been underestimated. I am guessing it might be due to recon data being either missing or missed some of the storm's actual intensity... Some storms may not be listed here at all.
I did not make this animation guys, I made the thumbnail
Why didn’t you make the animation
So this technically means that TWO people made the video itself?! One for the thumbnail and one for the animation?!
@@notmrpopular0099 it’s confusing
@@notmrpopular0099 not really
@@Itsatrap8295 Because Charlie took it first? I just offered to make the thumbnail
I didn't expect that this 1968 Typhoon season to be this hyperactive and with an insanely 587 ACE! What? And 11 super Typhoons and 6 of them are Cat 5 is just wow. And for the record which Typhoon season produces the most Cat 5 and also I'm sorry to say this but I prefer the old landfall animation because the landfall in this video and the 2022-2023 Australia cyclone season is kinder made me fell a little bit of goosebumps unlike that landfall animation of 2017 Atlantic hurricane season where Irma made landfall in the laser antilles made me feel goosebumps.😬
Ikr!
This season was definitely bonkers in terms of everything
Yeah, I am not sure if this season's influenced by an El Nino like this year, though... But it is probable maybe some storms are missing, and even if they are included, probably some of the storms intensities are higher than indicated due to recon data either is missing or underestimated...
I’ve seen the animation already, It was crazy
It is crazy indeed! And what do you know, this season might be... well probably underestimated?
@@notmrpopular0099 I know all, lol. I’m best friends with the animator and he did not disappoint during this!
@@jegbox-icegood for you
i was not expecting this season to surpass 1997 in ace
I mean, this is F13's analysis so this is unofficial... But keep in mind, there IS recon data back then like the ATL nowadays, so yet again, maybe most of this could be realized in the future.
What dies ace mean?
@@macchersl6571accumulated Cyclone energy, Its dependent on how strong the storm and its period of time with that intensity. Stronger the storm then more ace will be created. But if it last longer with that very strong intensity then they can create a ton of ace. It’s basically a way of showing on how intense the season was.
@@LucasgamerX_YT thanks bro
Dont know much about this season, It will be interesting
It included Agnes and Elaine and they were both C5s.
it possibly beats 1997 in terms of ACE, I only learned about this recently
@@Latino2904 literally just said what was on the thumbnail
This is probably the most underestimated WPAC season ever
@@aron1332 yea
And how do you do such amazing animations!!
Lol 1968 typhoon season's the season that all the pro pacific basins wanted this years west pacific typhoon season to be like 😂💀😭
I just wanna say this is the highest ace season i guess but idk. For those who dont know and didn't watch the video,the total of this season's ace is 587.This is the underestimating season ever
@EliRicke-xl9mw what about 1959?
@@SadElk122 Sorry for this, but please explain the intensity estimates you have listed. I am curious.
@EliRicke-xl9mw Thanks! If we are talking about size, Winnie appears to have been an extremely large tropical cyclone.
@@SadElk122 uh okay
@@SadElk122 KZC WPR paper showed storm speed, POCI, ROCI, and latitude can all affect winds or pressure. It is not true that only pressure and size are used. IBTRACS has complete information about all those parameters
I love this one.
Im waiting for 1997 wpac v3, 2009, 2011 and 2017 wpac v2
Am I the only one waiting for 2023 to end to see the 2023 WPAC?
Why is youtube deleting my chats.
There this more ace in the REAL LIFE season than in the 2030 Atlantic HYPO!
587 ACE is insane.
BTW I reanalyzed 1971 wpac and it had 500.49 ACE.
@@SadElk122 What were the strongest storms of the season? (Other than Irma of course)
1- Irma (215/870)
2- Nadine (200/895)
3- Amy (195/890)
4- Bess (185/898)
@@SadElk122 So Irma was probably 215mph?
@@SadElk122 What is your estimate for Wendy of that year?
@@SadElk122 Also, 2 200mph storms in the same season is actually insane
Why is Trix`s track weird
Ok who ever made the animation please I beg remove the landfall animation it looks bad
I agree, but sadly I can't do anything about it since it's really up to Nathan himself
Does that mean other creators would take the previous one?
@@Corgimationsyou can do something about it. say it during Sundays.
How many unnamed systems
1968:yes
F13: How many CAT5s do you want?
1968: *yes*
how did shirley and elaine have no deaths
Please make 2014 north indian ocean cyclone season animation
7:24 fake irma time
Fake Irma??? Irma was used for WPAC for a very long time way before Atlantic had a name Irma in their naming list. WPAC even had an Irma with an intensity far greater than Irma of Atlantic
@@aron1332 Very true, the 1971 WPAC Irma. If it is reanalyzed via KZC, I wonder what it's windspeed would be.
Oh, in the same research paper where Super Typhoon Nora of 1973 was reanalayzed with a windspeed of 181 knots, Irma was reanalyzed with a windspeed of 172 knots, or 197 miles per hour!
I wonder how strong Irma 1971 was... Some estimates go as low as 870mb!
This 1968 season have too many unnamed and too many super typhoon and too many ACE
@@SadElk122(late reply, sorry) 111?! wow was the year 1964 a El Niño?
@@DAJTheTH-camr_2007 If I remember correctly, it was a weak La Nina.
👁️👄👁️
………