Berkeley and Hume on Substance

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 17

  • @bertjunrieQ
    @bertjunrieQ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you for this lecture. Truly enlightening

  • @devilmansanchez
    @devilmansanchez 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I love your videos. I use them to compliment my philosophy classes.

    • @rareword
      @rareword 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      In French, complement and compliment are two very different things. Isn't it the same in English?

    • @FreeWill_is_unintelligible
      @FreeWill_is_unintelligible 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@rarewordIt is, indeed, the same thing in english! It was just a typo from the oroginal writer’s part.

  • @jaylinn416
    @jaylinn416 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow, the best explanation of Berkeley's Idealism I have seen on the internet. Thank you.

  • @emale03
    @emale03 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    ALWAYS ENLIGHTENING, THANK YOU

  • @tunnelman5756
    @tunnelman5756 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    For Locke, isn't the squirrel in your example really a complex idea (a combination of simple ideas) and not the substance? Each simple idea comes from a substance but that complex idea of a squirrel would come from a combination of the substances that are the origins of the simple ideas. Someone please explain if I am wrong thanks

    • @FightXScience-wh6kx
      @FightXScience-wh6kx ปีที่แล้ว

      Well, your use of terms is a little off. Simple ideas come not from substance (which Locke admits we have no experience of), but from sense impressions.

  • @parthapratimbhuyan950
    @parthapratimbhuyan950 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir plz give me a note Barkley problem of substance

  • @memetkara2117
    @memetkara2117 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why feel the need to censure and delete comments? :)

    • @PhiloofAlexandria
      @PhiloofAlexandria  3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      TH-cam holds certain comments automatically for my approval. I don’t check them every day, but I look at them about once a week and approve almost all. A few have expletives or are spam, directing people to unrelated websites, and I don’t approve those.

    • @memetkara2117
      @memetkara2117 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@PhiloofAlexandria Thank you for the confession ("unrelated websites"). Actually it was a book by Lenin and if you read it you will understand that it is directly related to this topic. But I understand your position, it's imposible to keep your place in the academy and be open to the works of people who founded the USSR and expropiated the rich who finances your university.

    • @PhiloofAlexandria
      @PhiloofAlexandria  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I don’t think I saw that comment-maybe I just missed it. I’ll look for it.

    • @FightXScience-wh6kx
      @FightXScience-wh6kx ปีที่แล้ว

      @@memetkara2117 You're a clown who knows nothing about how universities function. There's plenty of scholars who read and teach Lenin and the other degenerates you idolize.

  • @tomollie
    @tomollie 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Was the statue a cat.....or a baboon?

  • @Seal-hs5il
    @Seal-hs5il 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    That statue is actually a monkey from the German city of Heidelberg.
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heidelberg_Bridge_Monkey