I disagree about the shaft. I think a better solution is to run fiber to the 700ft level, and cat6 back up to 400 and 550ft level. This will provide some level of electrical isolation, reduse overall cabel length, make it easy to troubleshoot.
I think one "problem" is that Ubiquiti doesn't really have a small switch with at least one SFP Port. The smallest option seems to be the USW-Pro-8-PoE. And that model isn't really cheap, has SFP+ (overkill) and they claim 30W (Excluding PoE output) as max. power consumption. Even if it uses quite a bit less it's probably still on the hotter side and would require quite a big NEMA enclosoure to not cook itself. Using some external media converter would be an option but it would mean more complexity. I think other companies do have viable smaller "low power" switches for this sort of thing but i feel like that would be outside the comfort level. But i aggree, fiber would be the better option. This feels like it's only a sort of improvement over the current MoCA network.
Hybrid fiber with 32 fibers and a pair of conductors on the same armored cable. Most major producers (Panduit, Belden, Commscope) make fiber with electrical in a single cable. There would obviously be some voltage loss, but not enough that it would be a problem at that distance. People easily run cameras a mile from the data/power source on hybrid fiber. With 32 fibers, just split four off at every level into a fiber junction box and tap the electrical conductors to run the equipment.
I would also completely ditch a Ubiquity equipment. (I know it's nice to have a complete control over whole network from a single management point, but I think that Ubiquity devices are not suitable candidates for use in mines) And I would go with some industrial grade switches, these are rated(certified) for harsh conditions. Like extreme temperatures and high humid environments with a lot of condensation. So in the long run there will be less maintenance with this type of hardware. Nevertheless some of these switches have some sort of "boost for wired connections" so 300m (1000ft) links running at 100Mbit are possible. I haven't seen a 1gbit over that distance, but I think that 100Mbit is plenty for this situation. Or as mentioned the fibre is also a valid option.
Man, please make the install video a super long one. I absolutely love these types of videos. I was hoping you'd replace the coax with armored fiber, but I understand price and time budgets. Good work, I'll be waiting impatiently for the install video 😅
Hey! Man, I love Crosstalk and GTL getting together! That 900ft condo is going to be even better! Heck, the whole town! Thanks for this! You guys are awesome!
A good solution to the problem mentioned around 8:30 (double NAT) would be to put a UniFi switch in the solar cabinet and pass the WAN through as a VLAN. We have a similar situation at one of the non profits I volunteer at and the VLAN solution has worked perfectly. In UniFi, it would show the uplink as the bridge going to the UDM-SE and then obviously the ISP bridge’s LAN port would be the VLAN port.
1. Use a Leaky wave conductor for the mine 2. Double NAT is not needed here, just disable in on the dream machine and put static routes in place on both routers.
Fiber makes a ton of sense for the mine data wise. There are options for a combo cable to do power and fiber as a single cable using an external power supply in the hoist house.
This is an absolute ton of 5Ghz equipment when the primary ISP is already backfeeding via 5Ghz. - What channel width is the ISP using and what channel spacing are you using for the PTP and the Omni to the outbuildings. Adding in all of the internal U6APs and Mesh APs is fine, but there is going to need to be a very very concerned effort to avoid stepping on ISP's signal. The Omni might feel like a nesiciary evil at first glance, but Omnis are horrible for your noisefloor and retransmission with that many outbuildings especially when paired with metal siding/reflections. You may want to use 2x 5AC Lite 120s to give a better coverage on two obscured faces and or different smaller channel widths. I would even go as far as to change the PTP feed from the ISP into the central location to a Gigabeam, just to try to get on 60ghz with 5Ghz backup. Move the extra nanobeam recovered to one of the out buildings... And now that your running constant upload from the onsite cameras speced --- this is going to increase the noise floor even with local recording. The omni should be reconsidered if at all possible. You can replace the RocketPrism5AC with Antenna with two of the lite 120's for less cost, and clean up a ton of the noise that the omni will create. --- speaking from a WISP provider standpoint.
I also run a WISP. Gotta admit - I cringed big time when I saw that omni. Been there, done that - back in the early days. Granted, population density is about as low as you can get, so there's not a lot of RF there, but still.... Totally agree with the advantages of 60ghz for backhauls both for speed and to keep the RF clean.
Looks like an interesting project. I'm sure you already know, but it's pretty easy to program the Mikrotik to operate as a switch, and get rid of the NAT.
Honestly, being that the ISP's gear is a huge point of failure, that needs to be addressed first, before anything else is done. The second microwave hop is unnecessary, run direct burial fiber from there to whatever building that has reliable power is closest, then split it off with wireless tech from there. Or, skip the ISP entirely, paint the starlink dish to match the roof of the american hotel, and then split it off from there, which is way simpler and likely cheaper than the bespoke microwave link.
I agree. Even if it's on poles, I'd think you'd want to at least run fiber (armored, or in conduit?) as much as you could... from that ISP receiver to the town, or at the very least from the Store to the other buildings, or up to the Hoist House. I feel like they're trying to do it all on a budget (one AP for all three levels of the hotel? Wireless bridges instead of running wire, etc.) I really do hope it works out, but ... geez, that hotel is probably going to need its own network infrastructure too (I'd think) for communication, entertainment, POS, and more. Wireless isn't the answer for everything.
Interesting project. Kinda wish I had a project like this, having grown up in a mining community. I might have missed it but.... Be cautious of the quality of power. Make sure you're allowing for low and high voltage surges. The power may not be clean and could damage equipment. In the very least I'd consider power conditioners. UPSes would be better but then you have to consider the temperature extremes with regards to the batteries.
Personally would go for fibre in the mine at least to some extent, as others have said, and I do wonder how far a wifi signal will travel into each level from the mineshaft - my bet is 'not far'! I would be planning for at least 2 wired APs for each level, not just one. For main infrastructure I also question so many radio links when it is practical to bury 30-50m cable for a wired link and be much more reliable especially in the snow & rain. I bet Brent has the capability of digging the trenches inhouse so the only issue would be ensuring the cable wasn't broken by future construction work. If you go with these proposals, definitely add some sort of local UPS to shore up local power at many or even most of the PTP link sites; I get the feeling the quality of mains power will leave things to be desired! Also, adding a larger solar battery at the main radio, with possible small (18" dia?) wind supplement, will help keep that link alive in the winter. Finally, if you made the Hotel the centre point rather than the Store you're in a new-build anyway & in a place residents may well expect good network service in a way they wouldn't in the older parts of the town. I'm not sure, but it is also possible the hotel has better visibility to the mine house because it's farther from the spoil heaps, and as a building it's taller.
Can you explain why fiber isn't a consideration? Is it too expense? I was thinking maybe a fiber connection from the hoist house to city wouldn't be too crazy of an idea.
Amazing video and a unique look at the limitations and methods to achieve the result for the client. Looked forward to seeing this video and didn't disappoint.
This is a WiFi nerd's dream. What a fun project, and glad Brent got back to you! * The American Hotel, since it's new construction, could also have Cat 6 to the office/front desk and to each guest room, and that'd open up more flexibility for cameras, APs, and guest entertainment. * If that outhouse ends up having the PTP pole on top of it, I'd laugh if you threw in another mesh AP for some sick coverage for anyone using it 😂 * Knock on wood, but I hope there's not frequent lightning up at that elevation zapping the gear. Maybe throw in a dozen Ubiquiti ethernet surge protectors? * I hope that fancy GameChanger cable for the ~500 foot run works as advertised. Otherwise just run some armored OM3/OM4 cable and SFP modules, but that'd require either fancier switches or $100 in a pair of fiber adapters (I use a pair of Trendnet gigabit in production right now and they're stable.)
I would do some aerial fibre, needs less power than wireless and you can bandwidth through. Especially on anything backbone. This will allow the town to develop a long term network solution and easy to carry VLAN's without remote management issues. Camera's can be on VLAN's. Visitor WLAN, staff VLAN. Point of sale and management can be on its own VLAN. I like a central network idea and can build from that. Leaky wifi cable is how many commercial mines to it today. Sure maybe on some levels you want a more robust solution but fibre is great. Remember high up exposed = lightning attraction, some fibre isn't exposed too.
Been a follower of Cerro Gordo and you for many years. This is a very cool collaboration. I was hoping it would materialize into something after your previous video on their wireless.
I was actually just thinking about this recently, I have been following Brent on his channel since the beginning and I was thinking they need to get you out there for their networking and wifi, glad it is actually happening!
American Hotel should have at least two APs for redundancy and signal is never as good as expected. Overall this whole things seems to be both overkill and missing the most obvious solutions. From the solar relay station you put in a fibre link to the UDM and to the mine. It's a 1 time fixed cost to run a ditchwitch and you save yourself days of headache getting all these links to work reliably, heck add in a power line up to the solar relay and remove a serious failure point as well. VLANs over fibre are easy and would not overly complicate the scenario and cuts out a LOT of wireless links. In the mine you only need power at ground and 700ft since the rest of the levels could be fed 100m from the top or from the 700ft location via PoE with 700ft being a fibre link back to the surface. Overall points for creativity but you need more physical rather than wireless links for stability. Heck, drop in a few more fibre links around town as a star or loop with some media converters and you've got a solid base to throw APs and cameras on.
Locking yourselves into Ubiquiti equipment is hurting you more than it's benefiting you, especially on the mine shaft. Patton Electronics makes some incredible Ethernet Extenders that will nearly work over barbed wire fencing at 900 feet 🤣 They have both POE and Non-POE varieties. I can vouch for them after dozens of installs over several years, they dont fail.
The thing that I would worry about is all the L2 noise on those PtMP connections with all of the APs in bridge mode. L2 is full of useless communication on PtMP and PtP wireless links that eat bandwidth and increase latency. This is the main reason WISPs use the cheap routers, to break up those broadcast domains without breaking the bank. Convert the primary ISP MikroTik router into a switch. No double NAT and it doesn't lose its IP address for management if you perform the steps correctly. Unless it is not managed by Cerro Gordo.
came to the comments hoping I'd see this. Layer 3 for the win here. It's scalable and it would avoid the inevitable broadcast storm that will bring down the entire town's network.
Watch out for mains glitches caused by the pump starting up(assuming it doesn't run constantly) you may need to add some hefty electrolytic capacitors near the PSU on the DC side down there if that happens. If you do this watch out for inrush current caused by these too - you may need a 2 or 3-stage inrush resistor to the capacitors with relays bridging the resistors after a couple of seconds once the capacitors have charged OK. Othewise the PSU may crowbar if the capacitors are too fat. Long pump cable runs tend to be very "saggy" and this really shows up when the pump starts up and that's a long way down to troubleshoot random glitches.
Why not Game changer from the top to 200m down shafts with POE (drop for each level) Fiber down to where the pump is and then 200m in either direction where needed with POE??
I know there are cost considerations, it's remote and everything, but I'd do my best to hardwire/fiber everything as much as possible. It shouldn't be that hard to bury some armored cable in between the buildings at least(maybe it is, idk)
If the Game Changer cable doesn't pan out, LANShack builds custom length single and multi-mode cables in a variety of lengths, fiber count, and cable type (indoor/outdoor/direct burial armored) . 4 strand, direct burial, single mode @ 500 foot and LC-LC is around $788 shipped - may be a good option!
Re the double nat. I would say just chat to the isp ... that can probs setup a routed network down as its easy on mik. Also, overall just upgrading the batteries and solar at 2 sites would give you stability during a snow storm ... over starlink that varies.
I second the fiber optic cable. It's cheap and easy. Use a 12 strand and splice a strand at each level of the mine. That would future proof the data network for 10Gb. Electrical power can be added later.
Note for 11:40: if it’s a NS-5AC, it’ll just pass through the voltage that it’s powered with. The NS-5AC can be powered with either 24V or 48V, so if you just change the POE injector to 48V, you could use a U6-Mesh.
The mine needs glass fiber and decent power, period. Perhaps in town I would use fiber to interconnect the different houses. Not sure how Brent feels about cables, but if you want a stable and fast network, use cables!! But yeah, a lot more work, and probably a lot more expensive.
I'd address the double NAT problem putting in bridge mode the mikrotik or doing some dynamic routing between the Mikrotik and UDM router ... I was hoping to see a bit more L3 routing in this "mini-Campus LAN"
not watched this yet but will do shortly - Never thought these two channels that i watch would ever do a video together haha :) this is going to be great - looking forward to part 2
You may already know this, but the phase issue with the sound for the first scene is due to having both mic tracks playing back simultaneously. If you mute one of them it will sound cleaner. Thanks for another cool video!
I love me some point to point WiFi, but if reliability is the number 1 concern would a few direct burial fiber runs be the best solution, unless the soil is nothing but a big rock. (Sorry Floridan here and we don't have mountains, hell we don't even have hills and everything in the ground is dirty or limestone)
i think instead of the double poe injectors use a flex switch and the same for the solar tower than you will not have a double nat. and get rid of the switch ultras in the mine and use flex switch . or use under ground fiber to each building
Great video. The UK-Ultra could be a compelling option to control cost for some of the buildings. They can be mounted outside. They can be painted. They can be meshed, reducing the need for Airmax equipment. Dedicated Airmax links can always be added where and when it's needed. This would also improve the outdoor coverage, simplify inventory, and consolidate equipment to a single management panel.
Please consider fiber or hybrid fiber. Wireless is fancy and all but will never be as reliable as a cable link, especially inside the town. Also make sure to consider wiring a hybrid fiber cable to the solar-powered Mikrotek thingamagig to loose that point of failure. For the mineshaft some 32 hybrid fiber link would provide a few links to each floor and power. Maybe even stop using Ubiquiti for everything. It is nice, but will that work in a mine? Just choose some industrial equipment and that's fine. Also consider making the new hotel the main point of the whole system, as it's new so you don't have to retrofit most of the new equipment.
Hi I am very happy you are back again because I really love your show and making old towns that is very nice of you to do that for the people holl die there I will always praying 🙏 for you and your family and your friends so you will be safe and please be careful out there ok can you do more new show for all of us please we will be waiting for you ok you have a wonderful day and have a good night and day ok love Lorilee xoxoxoxox
How hard would it be to have ac outlets at every level, since there already is power going down the shaft? With AC power at every level it would a simple job to put in a switch, camera, access point. As for the data, you would run fibre down the shaft, or run ethernet from level to level since we are talking about 100 feet between each level.
The amount of wireless devices this relies on is completely unnecessary. Just run fiber from the isp location into town, then fiber around town and single internal APs in each building. Better latency and not prone to failure. Handle the mine shaft with hybrid fiber as other comments have said. You're vastly over complicating this, and I say that as a near-professional overcomplicator.
Ui products, even tho not ipxx rated for most products, actually is really relaible in exposed weather. I have old ap's and switches outside where i dont care if it breaks and after a few years in the Phoenix sun/heat, they are all still going strong. The only equipment i found that doesnt like the phoenix heat/sun is rhe G3 Flex cams. They last about 3 years when in direct sun (facing south) ones that are not in direct sun and on east/west sides where it sees sun for just a few hours a day, last forever. The sun seems to destroy the cam sensor and burns it out.
Idk man, I like most of the plan, but not setting up VLAN between the solar station to keep one single network was just lazy. I think the separate NAT'd networks will cause more confusion and potential issues in the future than a simple VLAN config would have. You could have also eliminated the double NAT issue with a VLAN for the incoming WAN.
Couple of additional thoughts on the solar powered relays: consider burying the batteries in any sort of sturdy box to take advantage of the warmer earth in winter to dramatically boost battery performance. Also, adding a second panel, and mounting the panels higher above ground and at a much steeper angle will help with shedding snow. The efficiency reduction in summer caused by the steep panel angle is moot with all day being sunny.
Since there's power available in the mine shaft, a pair of fiber-ethernet converter or several fibric daisy chained switches with SFP(+) would solve the problem. Just add power sockets to the power line of the pump at each level that needs internet access.
At 66, I wish I shared Brent's enthusiam for isolation. Oh well at least future visitors will be able to play Fallout 76, especially if Spacex gets Starlink up and running this summer like they are saying.
Anywhere you're using 2 poe injectors I would suggest using 5 port PoE switches, so that you have the option of connecting local devices to Ethernet, or for further expansion.
This install fails to address a number of issues and creates new ones. Do not double NAT it will just cause issues especially for any inbound connections. You could easily replace the mikrotik or change the config on it in the solar repeater to not NAT and just simply route. I feel there is a un said subtext that there may be relationship issues with the ISP and the mine. There are other networking vendors aside from Ubiquiti that could be used for this kind of install. I would 100% use fibre down the mine and run power to any access points and cameras. Running POE cat 6 in un unarmored cables outside of conduit with DC power could lead to sparks and fire. Especially in a mine environment. Saying you want to use WiFi for safety and communication could lead to serious legal implications and repercussions in the event of someone being injured and killed and the WiFi being a factor the person could not get help. I would seek legal advice on this. Normally mines use engineered man safety systems to handle this.
With the Hoist House/Mine, could a WiFi mesh network be used? Using a directional Antenna at the top of the shaft, beaming a signal down and then Mesh access points at the levels you want extended sideways coverage. It would be interesting to know if this would be doable, and the Pro/Cons of such a setup.
Not an ideal solution for getting wireless to the hoist house, but could you put up two point-to-point stations on the rock pile with solar/batteries? One that faces the General Store and the other facing the Hoist House.
Isn’t there a way to get some kind of connection through already existing power cables? All this buildings and the mine seems to be connected to a single power source
Not concerned at all with Protect cameras constantly broadcasting over a wifi connection instead of having a localized (hardwired) Protect instance? (In the hotel)
I would have run underground ethernet to all the buildings, they all seem to be within 30 meters from the main house, and a small switch in each for the network. Then run a fiber down to the bottom of the mine to the pump, and run ethernet to each level with a small ap. While there is alot of digging in this case, its more stable, cuts down on wireless interference and long term probably cheaper in terms of time.
Is there a list of the products that you used in this setup? There's a few little options there that I'd love to look into that (like that 1U ups or the little 4U rack you picked)
Persolany i would have changed the P2MP with a P2P to the UDM SE, no mikrotik router, direct "public IP" to the UDM SE, and continued with your curent setup 👍 i also dont like the double POE Injector, but if it works for them, it's all good 👍
![[Full] 4 ต่อ 4 Celebrity EP.910 | 22 ก.ย. 67 | one31](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/4TR3MVpOiw8/mqdefault.jpg)
I disagree about the shaft.
I think a better solution is to run fiber to the 700ft level, and cat6 back up to 400 and 550ft level. This will provide some level of electrical isolation, reduse overall cabel length, make it easy to troubleshoot.
yea putting a 8-pro at the top and 700 level and ultras or the Flex-46W on the middle floors. means you only need AC power at the top and 700 level.
I think one "problem" is that Ubiquiti doesn't really have a small switch with at least one SFP Port. The smallest option seems to be the USW-Pro-8-PoE. And that model isn't really cheap, has SFP+ (overkill) and they claim 30W (Excluding PoE output) as max. power consumption. Even if it uses quite a bit less it's probably still on the hotter side and would require quite a big NEMA enclosoure to not cook itself.
Using some external media converter would be an option but it would mean more complexity. I think other companies do have viable smaller "low power" switches for this sort of thing but i feel like that would be outside the comfort level.
But i aggree, fiber would be the better option. This feels like it's only a sort of improvement over the current MoCA network.
Hybrid fiber with 32 fibers and a pair of conductors on the same armored cable. Most major producers (Panduit, Belden, Commscope) make fiber with electrical in a single cable. There would obviously be some voltage loss, but not enough that it would be a problem at that distance. People easily run cameras a mile from the data/power source on hybrid fiber. With 32 fibers, just split four off at every level into a fiber junction box and tap the electrical conductors to run the equipment.
I would also completely ditch a Ubiquity equipment. (I know it's nice to have a complete control over whole network from a single management point, but I think that Ubiquity devices are not suitable candidates for use in mines) And I would go with some industrial grade switches, these are rated(certified) for harsh conditions. Like extreme temperatures and high humid environments with a lot of condensation. So in the long run there will be less maintenance with this type of hardware.
Nevertheless some of these switches have some sort of "boost for wired connections" so 300m (1000ft) links running at 100Mbit are possible. I haven't seen a 1gbit over that distance, but I think that 100Mbit is plenty for this situation. Or as mentioned the fibre is also a valid option.
@@vasekhorcicka5007 USW-Industrial
Man, please make the install video a super long one. I absolutely love these types of videos. I was hoping you'd replace the coax with armored fiber, but I understand price and time budgets. Good work, I'll be waiting impatiently for the install video 😅
Hey! Man, I love Crosstalk and GTL getting together! That 900ft condo is going to be even better! Heck, the whole town! Thanks for this! You guys are awesome!
Two great channels collabing on a project, i love it! I can't wait for part 2.
Can't wait for part 2!
Same!
A good solution to the problem mentioned around 8:30 (double NAT) would be to put a UniFi switch in the solar cabinet and pass the WAN through as a VLAN. We have a similar situation at one of the non profits I volunteer at and the VLAN solution has worked perfectly. In UniFi, it would show the uplink as the bridge going to the UDM-SE and then obviously the ISP bridge’s LAN port would be the VLAN port.
Did the same at our farm after watching Crosstalk’s videos. Works but difficulty to troubleshoot when it is not working
Yeah that would be a pretty simple solution. Just be sure to label the port(s) "WAN VLAN" or whatever
This guy has done really cool stuff with his little town
1. Use a Leaky wave conductor for the mine
2. Double NAT is not needed here, just disable in on the dream machine and put static routes in place on both routers.
Or disable the NAT on the Mikrotik and continue its bridge or VLAN an terminate it on the dream machine which can do the NAT and act as the router
@@moe85moe85 na, never use L2 when there is an L3 option available.
Might be ISP managed
Fiber makes a ton of sense for the mine data wise. There are options for a combo cable to do power and fiber as a single cable using an external power supply in the hoist house.
This is an absolute ton of 5Ghz equipment when the primary ISP is already backfeeding via 5Ghz. - What channel width is the ISP using and what channel spacing are you using for the PTP and the Omni to the outbuildings. Adding in all of the internal U6APs and Mesh APs is fine, but there is going to need to be a very very concerned effort to avoid stepping on ISP's signal. The Omni might feel like a nesiciary evil at first glance, but Omnis are horrible for your noisefloor and retransmission with that many outbuildings especially when paired with metal siding/reflections. You may want to use 2x 5AC Lite 120s to give a better coverage on two obscured faces and or different smaller channel widths. I would even go as far as to change the PTP feed from the ISP into the central location to a Gigabeam, just to try to get on 60ghz with 5Ghz backup. Move the extra nanobeam recovered to one of the out buildings... And now that your running constant upload from the onsite cameras speced --- this is going to increase the noise floor even with local recording. The omni should be reconsidered if at all possible. You can replace the RocketPrism5AC with Antenna with two of the lite 120's for less cost, and clean up a ton of the noise that the omni will create. --- speaking from a WISP provider standpoint.
I also run a WISP. Gotta admit - I cringed big time when I saw that omni. Been there, done that - back in the early days.
Granted, population density is about as low as you can get, so there's not a lot of RF there, but still....
Totally agree with the advantages of 60ghz for backhauls both for speed and to keep the RF clean.
If you think it’s bad now, wait another decade for projects like this to show their age.
Awesome you were able to get out there and work in Cerro Gordo.
It's wonderful to see you helping Grant out. So many TH-camrs have stepped up and helped. Thanks, Chris. Great video
Awesome to see two of my favorite TH-camrs teaming up!
Looks like an interesting project.
I'm sure you already know, but it's pretty easy to program the Mikrotik to operate as a switch, and get rid of the NAT.
Honestly, being that the ISP's gear is a huge point of failure, that needs to be addressed first, before anything else is done.
The second microwave hop is unnecessary, run direct burial fiber from there to whatever building that has reliable power is closest, then split it off with wireless tech from there.
Or, skip the ISP entirely, paint the starlink dish to match the roof of the american hotel, and then split it off from there, which is way simpler and likely cheaper than the bespoke microwave link.
I agree. Even if it's on poles, I'd think you'd want to at least run fiber (armored, or in conduit?) as much as you could... from that ISP receiver to the town, or at the very least from the Store to the other buildings, or up to the Hoist House.
I feel like they're trying to do it all on a budget (one AP for all three levels of the hotel? Wireless bridges instead of running wire, etc.)
I really do hope it works out, but ... geez, that hotel is probably going to need its own network infrastructure too (I'd think) for communication, entertainment, POS, and more. Wireless isn't the answer for everything.
Burying stuff there is not easy, mostly rock.
Were you not tempted with a solution involving the Ubiquiti F-POE-G2 and an hybrid fibre/24v power cable for the shaft part of this project?
Looks like that device can handle 50v as well, which would help with voltage drop
Interesting project. Kinda wish I had a project like this, having grown up in a mining community.
I might have missed it but....
Be cautious of the quality of power. Make sure you're allowing for low and high voltage surges. The power may not be clean and could damage equipment.
In the very least I'd consider power conditioners. UPSes would be better but then you have to consider the temperature extremes with regards to the batteries.
Personally would go for fibre in the mine at least to some extent, as others have said, and I do wonder how far a wifi signal will travel into each level from the mineshaft - my bet is 'not far'! I would be planning for at least 2 wired APs for each level, not just one.
For main infrastructure I also question so many radio links when it is practical to bury 30-50m cable for a wired link and be much more reliable especially in the snow & rain. I bet Brent has the capability of digging the trenches inhouse so the only issue would be ensuring the cable wasn't broken by future construction work.
If you go with these proposals, definitely add some sort of local UPS to shore up local power at many or even most of the PTP link sites; I get the feeling the quality of mains power will leave things to be desired! Also, adding a larger solar battery at the main radio, with possible small (18" dia?) wind supplement, will help keep that link alive in the winter.
Finally, if you made the Hotel the centre point rather than the Store you're in a new-build anyway & in a place residents may well expect good network service in a way they wouldn't in the older parts of the town. I'm not sure, but it is also possible the hotel has better visibility to the mine house because it's farther from the spoil heaps, and as a building it's taller.
Fascinating project! Love the creativity behind using point-to-point links to get internet access in such a remote location.
Can you explain why fiber isn't a consideration? Is it too expense? I was thinking maybe a fiber connection from the hoist house to city wouldn't be too crazy of an idea.
😂 do you really want to know? I can enlighten you, if you're ready to have your entire world flipped upside down😂😂😂
I really don't think you can handle this
Amazing video and a unique look at the limitations and methods to achieve the result for the client.
Looked forward to seeing this video and didn't disappoint.
Solid choice of AP gentlemen. As a low voltage tech who's been up there, this video tickles all my fancies!
I've been watching GTL for quite a while... This colab is not only exactly what they need, but is going to be awesome to watch unfold
This is a WiFi nerd's dream. What a fun project, and glad Brent got back to you!
* The American Hotel, since it's new construction, could also have Cat 6 to the office/front desk and to each guest room, and that'd open up more flexibility for cameras, APs, and guest entertainment.
* If that outhouse ends up having the PTP pole on top of it, I'd laugh if you threw in another mesh AP for some sick coverage for anyone using it 😂
* Knock on wood, but I hope there's not frequent lightning up at that elevation zapping the gear. Maybe throw in a dozen Ubiquiti ethernet surge protectors?
* I hope that fancy GameChanger cable for the ~500 foot run works as advertised. Otherwise just run some armored OM3/OM4 cable and SFP modules, but that'd require either fancier switches or $100 in a pair of fiber adapters (I use a pair of Trendnet gigabit in production right now and they're stable.)
What an awesome video!
Your ability to articulate things is epic, great video! Subscribed
Cliffhanger! To be continued! I can't wait for part 2!
Eager to watch the installation video
Was actually waiting for this kind of video. Awesome stuff
I would do some aerial fibre, needs less power than wireless and you can bandwidth through. Especially on anything backbone. This will allow the town to develop a long term network solution and easy to carry VLAN's without remote management issues. Camera's can be on VLAN's. Visitor WLAN, staff VLAN. Point of sale and management can be on its own VLAN.
I like a central network idea and can build from that.
Leaky wifi cable is how many commercial mines to it today. Sure maybe on some levels you want a more robust solution but fibre is great.
Remember high up exposed = lightning attraction, some fibre isn't exposed too.
Thanks Chris for posting this vid! Love these types of planning and setup videos!
Been a follower of Cerro Gordo and you for many years. This is a very cool collaboration. I was hoping it would materialize into something after your previous video on their wireless.
I was actually just thinking about this recently, I have been following Brent on his channel since the beginning and I was thinking they need to get you out there for their networking and wifi, glad it is actually happening!
I love Cerro Gordo and Brents channel this was very well planned out when is part 2 coming out???
American Hotel should have at least two APs for redundancy and signal is never as good as expected. Overall this whole things seems to be both overkill and missing the most obvious solutions. From the solar relay station you put in a fibre link to the UDM and to the mine. It's a 1 time fixed cost to run a ditchwitch and you save yourself days of headache getting all these links to work reliably, heck add in a power line up to the solar relay and remove a serious failure point as well. VLANs over fibre are easy and would not overly complicate the scenario and cuts out a LOT of wireless links. In the mine you only need power at ground and 700ft since the rest of the levels could be fed 100m from the top or from the 700ft location via PoE with 700ft being a fibre link back to the surface.
Overall points for creativity but you need more physical rather than wireless links for stability. Heck, drop in a few more fibre links around town as a star or loop with some media converters and you've got a solid base to throw APs and cameras on.
Locking yourselves into Ubiquiti equipment is hurting you more than it's benefiting you, especially on the mine shaft. Patton Electronics makes some incredible Ethernet Extenders that will nearly work over barbed wire fencing at 900 feet 🤣 They have both POE and Non-POE varieties. I can vouch for them after dozens of installs over several years, they dont fail.
The thing that I would worry about is all the L2 noise on those PtMP connections with all of the APs in bridge mode. L2 is full of useless communication on PtMP and PtP wireless links that eat bandwidth and increase latency. This is the main reason WISPs use the cheap routers, to break up those broadcast domains without breaking the bank.
Convert the primary ISP MikroTik router into a switch. No double NAT and it doesn't lose its IP address for management if you perform the steps correctly. Unless it is not managed by Cerro Gordo.
Is that bonjour, mdns, etc?
@@edc1569 that and MAC, DHCP, broadcast IP addresses. Lots of noise.
came to the comments hoping I'd see this. Layer 3 for the win here. It's scalable and it would avoid the inevitable broadcast storm that will bring down the entire town's network.
This was a really cool video. Can’t wait to see part 2!
I'm glad you guys are helping out Brent
Watch out for mains glitches caused by the pump starting up(assuming it doesn't run constantly) you may need to add some hefty electrolytic capacitors near the PSU on the DC side down there if that happens. If you do this watch out for inrush current caused by these too - you may need a 2 or 3-stage inrush resistor to the capacitors with relays bridging the resistors after a couple of seconds once the capacitors have charged OK.
Othewise the PSU may crowbar if the capacitors are too fat.
Long pump cable runs tend to be very "saggy" and this really shows up when the pump starts up and that's a long way down to troubleshoot random glitches.
This is EPIC, thanks for sharing!
Star link works great for me in the Canadian wilderness ,
Why not
Game changer from the top to 200m down shafts with POE (drop for each level)
Fiber down to where the pump is and then 200m in either direction where needed with POE??
I commented on the underground wifi GTL video that this would be a good colab with Crosstalk Solutions and here we are a couple of months later!
I know there are cost considerations, it's remote and everything, but I'd do my best to hardwire/fiber everything as much as possible. It shouldn't be that hard to bury some armored cable in between the buildings at least(maybe it is, idk)
Hey Chris!
The Nanostation AC is can powered from standard poe, no need for 24 v converters its the only compact client thets support 48 volt.
If the Game Changer cable doesn't pan out, LANShack builds custom length single and multi-mode cables in a variety of lengths, fiber count, and cable type (indoor/outdoor/direct burial armored) . 4 strand, direct burial, single mode @ 500 foot and LC-LC is around $788 shipped - may be a good option!
THE TEAMUP WE NEEDED!
Re the double nat.
I would say just chat to the isp ... that can probs setup a routed network down as its easy on mik.
Also, overall just upgrading the batteries and solar at 2 sites would give you stability during a snow storm ... over starlink that varies.
I second the fiber optic cable. It's cheap and easy. Use a 12 strand and splice a strand at each level of the mine. That would future proof the data network for 10Gb. Electrical power can be added later.
Fun project to watch
Note for 11:40: if it’s a NS-5AC, it’ll just pass through the voltage that it’s powered with. The NS-5AC can be powered with either 24V or 48V, so if you just change the POE injector to 48V, you could use a U6-Mesh.
The mine needs glass fiber and decent power, period.
Perhaps in town I would use fiber to interconnect the different houses. Not sure how Brent feels about cables, but if you want a stable and fast network, use cables!! But yeah, a lot more work, and probably a lot more expensive.
LOL The colab we needed!
Oh, good thing you uploaded a new video on 23rd april because I forgot I wanted to see this internet update
The collab I have been waiting for!! 🎉
Waiting for part II on this video
It'll be a while...I don't think we're going back until Sep/Oct timeframe.
I'd address the double NAT problem putting in bridge mode the mikrotik or doing some dynamic routing between the Mikrotik and UDM router ... I was hoping to see a bit more L3 routing in this "mini-Campus LAN"
not watched this yet but will do shortly - Never thought these two channels that i watch would ever do a video together haha :) this is going to be great - looking forward to part 2
It would be so cool to have a town of XGPON for inter connectivity. You could have dual wan from dual OLTs for each building.
Curious why not go fiber to the 700 ft level? I suppose that special CAT6e works, but seems like fiber would be more reliable.
You may already know this, but the phase issue with the sound for the first scene is due to having both mic tracks playing back simultaneously. If you mute one of them it will sound cleaner. Thanks for another cool video!
I love me some point to point WiFi, but if reliability is the number 1 concern would a few direct burial fiber runs be the best solution, unless the soil is nothing but a big rock. (Sorry Floridan here and we don't have mountains, hell we don't even have hills and everything in the ground is dirty or limestone)
So glad you and Brent were able to get together. I'm a big fan of both channels
This is fantastic, I love these kinds of network puzzles. I look forward to seeing all of this comes together.
i think instead of the double poe injectors use a flex switch and the same for the solar tower than you will not have a double nat. and get rid of the switch ultras in the mine and use flex switch . or use under ground fiber to each building
Cool video it’s was a lot interesting things and information I love it
Great video. The UK-Ultra could be a compelling option to control cost for some of the buildings.
They can be mounted outside. They can be painted. They can be meshed, reducing the need for Airmax equipment. Dedicated Airmax links can always be added where and when it's needed. This would also improve the outdoor coverage, simplify inventory, and consolidate equipment to a single management panel.
Oh I've been waiting for this colab
Please consider fiber or hybrid fiber. Wireless is fancy and all but will never be as reliable as a cable link, especially inside the town. Also make sure to consider wiring a hybrid fiber cable to the solar-powered Mikrotek thingamagig to loose that point of failure. For the mineshaft some 32 hybrid fiber link would provide a few links to each floor and power. Maybe even stop using Ubiquiti for everything. It is nice, but will that work in a mine? Just choose some industrial equipment and that's fine. Also consider making the new hotel the main point of the whole system, as it's new so you don't have to retrofit most of the new equipment.
I would like to see more electrical isolation, grounding and bonding or that long copper run into the mine shaft.
Hi I am very happy you are back again because I really love your show and making old towns that is very nice of you to do that for the people holl die there I will always praying 🙏 for you and your family and your friends so you will be safe and please be careful out there ok can you do more new show for all of us please we will be waiting for you ok you have a wonderful day and have a good night and day ok love Lorilee xoxoxoxox
How hard would it be to have ac outlets at every level, since there already is power going down the shaft? With AC power at every level it would a simple job to put in a switch, camera, access point. As for the data, you would run fibre down the shaft, or run ethernet from level to level since we are talking about 100 feet between each level.
There is already power at each level. Shown in this video. th-cam.com/video/9dRvYC_-Y3g/w-d-xo.htmlsi=itCobYP24aaJTr-c&t=216
This video is intersecting my interests extremely well. You have my sub! I'm eagerly awaiting part 2.
The amount of wireless devices this relies on is completely unnecessary. Just run fiber from the isp location into town, then fiber around town and single internal APs in each building. Better latency and not prone to failure.
Handle the mine shaft with hybrid fiber as other comments have said. You're vastly over complicating this, and I say that as a near-professional overcomplicator.
What to guess that the crazy cost to run fibre everywhere?
Ui products, even tho not ipxx rated for most products, actually is really relaible in exposed weather. I have old ap's and switches outside where i dont care if it breaks and after a few years in the Phoenix sun/heat, they are all still going strong. The only equipment i found that doesnt like the phoenix heat/sun is rhe G3 Flex cams. They last about 3 years when in direct sun (facing south) ones that are not in direct sun and on east/west sides where it sees sun for just a few hours a day, last forever. The sun seems to destroy the cam sensor and burns it out.
Idk man, I like most of the plan, but not setting up VLAN between the solar station to keep one single network was just lazy. I think the separate NAT'd networks will cause more confusion and potential issues in the future than a simple VLAN config would have.
You could have also eliminated the double NAT issue with a VLAN for the incoming WAN.
Couple of additional thoughts on the solar powered relays: consider burying the batteries in any sort of sturdy box to take advantage of the warmer earth in winter to dramatically boost battery performance. Also, adding a second panel, and mounting the panels higher above ground and at a much steeper angle will help with shedding snow. The efficiency reduction in summer caused by the steep panel angle is moot with all day being sunny.
You can get bifacial solar panels and mount them vertical.
Yeah I would double up on the panels, add some height, and put batteries in a job-box
Perfect Video - may i do a similar thing for my friends in Nepal (born in Nepal as a Sherpa^^) ....
Since there's power available in the mine shaft, a pair of fiber-ethernet converter or several fibric daisy chained switches with SFP(+) would solve the problem. Just add power sockets to the power line of the pump at each level that needs internet access.
Crossover i didn't know i wanted
At 66, I wish I shared Brent's enthusiam for isolation. Oh well at least future visitors will be able to play Fallout 76, especially if Spacex gets Starlink up and running this summer like they are saying.
Best collab for me
Anywhere you're using 2 poe injectors I would suggest using 5 port PoE switches, so that you have the option of connecting local devices to Ethernet, or for further expansion.
This install fails to address a number of issues and creates new ones.
Do not double NAT it will just cause issues especially for any inbound connections.
You could easily replace the mikrotik or change the config on it in the solar repeater to not NAT and just simply route.
I feel there is a un said subtext that there may be relationship issues with the ISP and the mine.
There are other networking vendors aside from Ubiquiti that could be used for this kind of install.
I would 100% use fibre down the mine and run power to any access points and cameras.
Running POE cat 6 in un unarmored cables outside of conduit with DC power could lead to sparks and fire. Especially in a mine environment.
Saying you want to use WiFi for safety and communication could lead to serious legal implications and repercussions in the event of someone being injured and killed and the WiFi being a factor the person could not get help. I would seek legal advice on this. Normally mines use engineered man safety systems to handle this.
What about trenching some fiber between some of the buildings?
With the Hoist House/Mine, could a WiFi mesh network be used?
Using a directional Antenna at the top of the shaft, beaming a signal down and then Mesh access points at the levels you want extended sideways coverage.
It would be interesting to know if this would be doable, and the Pro/Cons of such a setup.
Not an ideal solution for getting wireless to the hoist house, but could you put up two point-to-point stations on the rock pile with solar/batteries? One that faces the General Store and the other facing the Hoist House.
avesome video watched it to end without pausing waiting for next part
Wow, can't wait for the second part for the implementation.
you could do point to multi point on the mine shaft
Isn’t there a way to get some kind of connection through already existing power cables? All this buildings and the mine seems to be connected to a single power source
The Hoist House is actually on its own power separate from the town.
I like this.
Not concerned at all with Protect cameras constantly broadcasting over a wifi connection instead of having a localized (hardwired) Protect instance? (In the hotel)
I would have run underground ethernet to all the buildings, they all seem to be within 30 meters from the main house, and a small switch in each for the network. Then run a fiber down to the bottom of the mine to the pump, and run ethernet to each level with a small ap. While there is alot of digging in this case, its more stable, cuts down on wireless interference and long term probably cheaper in terms of time.
16:51 Convince him to build s 350 Ft Tower place POE beam on it to hoist house. 🤣
Could you not just fire a Point to Point vertically down the shaft?
Is there a list of the products that you used in this setup? There's a few little options there that I'd love to look into that (like that 1U ups or the little 4U rack you picked)
Persolany i would have changed the P2MP with a P2P to the UDM SE, no mikrotik router, direct "public IP" to the UDM SE, and continued with your curent setup 👍
i also dont like the double POE Injector, but if it works for them, it's all good 👍
Maybe Starlink?