The accelerometer should be mounted so its longitudinal axis runs through the center of the crankshaft or in your case the prop shaft. When you say it should be mounted perpendicular to the cylinders, that would be true when talking about traditional horizontally opposed aircraft engines where you would mount it at the 12 o'clock position as close to the prop as possible. But since you are not balancing the cylinders but rather the propeller the relationship to the prop and the shaft that spins it is the most important. In your case, the same 12 o'clock position holds true with the longitudinal axis of the accelerometer running through the center of the prop shaft. Think about the unbalanced propeller spinning in circles the heavy side of this rotating mass is trying to pull the engine to the outside as it goes round and round. So the front of the engine moves in a small circle following the heavy side of the rotating mass, this is the vibration you and the entire airframe feel! This vibration radiates outward from the center of the rotating mass and the accelerometer that senses acceleration along its longitudinal axis when misaligned with the source of movement (vibration) will have reduced accuracy. Now if you will, think about landing your aircraft in a quartering crosswind. As the wind hitting your aircraft moves off of the wing tip toward the front of the aircraft it has less effect of pushing the aircraft off the side of the runway. So, with the accelerometer's side case pointed at the source of the vibration the effect of the vibration is reduced to the point that it only senses the rotational force created as the engine follows the unbalanced rotating mass in circles. I would bet that if you had the exact same setup except with the accelerometer being pointed toward the prop's center of rotation instead of away from it by 80 to 90 degrees your ips reading would be considerably higher!
That Photo sensor seems a long way from the prop. Question, why not do what the machine says instead of putting a weight on first, seems like a backwards way round of doing things?
Great question. I typically use a piece of reflective tape about 1 to 1.25 inches by 1 inch. The problem with the setup in the video is the photo tach is mounted so far away that it becomes much more difficult to aim and hit the tape. The recommended distance from the tape is not less than 6", farther away is okay when necessary but rarely is it necessary to be more than 7-8". The tape is very lightweight and has a minimal effect on balance in close to the center of rotation. The farther from the center the more effect it will have though!
The rotax 912 is a prime example of an engine that you should not turn backwards, it relies on the engine turning in the correct direction to scavenge all of the oil from the dry sump, and it is possible to damage it.
Once the assembly is balanced it becomes an indexed assembly and if taken apart it should be reassembled with exactly the same "index" or orientation of the parts.
The accelerometer should be mounted so its longitudinal axis runs through the center of the crankshaft or in your case the prop shaft. When you say it should be mounted perpendicular to the cylinders, that would be true when talking about traditional horizontally opposed aircraft engines where you would mount it at the 12 o'clock position as close to the prop as possible. But since you are not balancing the cylinders but rather the propeller the relationship to the prop and the shaft that spins it is the most important. In your case, the same 12 o'clock position holds true with the longitudinal axis of the accelerometer running through the center of the prop shaft.
Think about the unbalanced propeller spinning in circles the heavy side of this rotating mass is trying to pull the engine to the outside as it goes round and round. So the front of the engine moves in a small circle following the heavy side of the rotating mass, this is the vibration you and the entire airframe feel! This vibration radiates outward from the center of the rotating mass and the accelerometer that senses acceleration along its longitudinal axis when misaligned with the source of movement (vibration) will have reduced accuracy. Now if you will, think about landing your aircraft in a quartering crosswind. As the wind hitting your aircraft moves off of the wing tip toward the front of the aircraft it has less effect of pushing the aircraft off the side of the runway. So, with the accelerometer's side case pointed at the source of the vibration the effect of the vibration is reduced to the point that it only senses the rotational force created as the engine follows the unbalanced rotating mass in circles.
I would bet that if you had the exact same setup except with the accelerometer being pointed toward the prop's center of rotation instead of away from it by 80 to 90 degrees your ips reading would be considerably higher!
That Photo sensor seems a long way from the prop. Question, why not do what the machine says instead of putting a weight on first, seems like a backwards way round of doing things?
Good tip keep them coming I enjoy all your tips and find most very useful. Thanks
Great video! Thanks for sharing your knowledge with all of us 😄
Great information. Thank you for posting.
Great video 😊
I wonder about the mass and arm of the tape on the blade... are you supposed to use a long strip like that?
Great question. I typically use a piece of reflective tape about 1 to 1.25 inches by 1 inch. The problem with the setup in the video is the photo tach is mounted so far away that it becomes much more difficult to aim and hit the tape. The recommended distance from the tape is not less than 6", farther away is okay when necessary but rarely is it necessary to be more than 7-8".
The tape is very lightweight and has a minimal effect on balance in close to the center of rotation. The farther from the center the more effect it will have though!
Great video. What about balancing the blades?
That typically tends to be an overhaul shop procedure.
Hello, plz tell me where I can get fore sell engine n secondhand propeller
did he turn the engine backwards at 5:30? oh my!
Nothing happens to it. It is not a car engine.
Thomas Heaven It is a car engine actually, but still nothing happens. that’s mostly a myth that at best only applies to specific engines.
If he has a gauge vacuum pump... don’t turn it backwards.
The rotax 912 is a prime example of an engine that you should not turn backwards, it relies on the engine turning in the correct direction to scavenge all of the oil from the dry sump, and it is possible to damage it.
Do all airplane spinners have to go certain way? and if I put it back a different way can that cause vibration on the plane? Thank you
Once the assembly is balanced it becomes an indexed assembly and if taken apart it should be reassembled with exactly the same "index" or orientation of the parts.
i am working on a car engine to a fly one how can i attach it pls suggest some information
Don't. That's my suggestion
Good job my friend
What kind of engine is it ? What type of aircraft is it ?
www.vikingaircraftengines.com/
goooood. may I study.?
I'd love to watch your video, but the damn dog barking is somewhat of a major distraction.......