TheRepty818 Anyone with a gun do a 24hr video without a gun. This will be shocking content 🙀 Please give a like for all to see. Spread this message also.
Paul Escalona or how about anyone that doesnt have a gun, never bought a gun, never went through the process of purchasing a firearm, or even shot a gun, ACTUALLY GO THROUGH THE PROCESS YOURSELF AND GAIN MORE KNOWLEDGE ON GUNS. I'm from Alaska, we all grow up around guns, we learn from the beginning it is not a toy, it is a tool. There is so much mislead information about firearms, and nowadays pepl dont check sources enough. And the pepl making the sources havent ever done it in person lol
@@troyboi7662 Problem is what works in rural areas doesn't work in metropolitan areas and vice versa. You talk about what people learn in Alaska to get guns, yet in the big cities, none of that is required.
Yes it is shocking how Americans do not know the legal law,it is shocking how They do not know that any law which violates the constitution of the United States of America is not legally law it is null and void. It shows 95 % of Americans are dumbdown brainwashed sheep who actually believe weapons laws are legal in the United States of America,no weapons laws in America are legal law they are null and void they are in violation of the Supreme law of the land the United States constitution which overrides and supersedes all laws. The right of the people,to keep and bear arms,shall not be infringed. The second amendment is just like the first it presents two separate issues which are interconnected.
Passing a background check for each time you buy a new firearm is not enough, an owner of a single firearm can become a potential threat to others or himself even if they passed the background check the one time they bought the firearm...
@@DJVIDZ that's a bit of a leap from what he said lol. There's quite a bit u can do like having a license to own guns and having to renew that license every few years. That would even solve the loop holes where you can buy a gun without a check, if u needed a license in the first place.
Ora Nyan Exactly! They should have done a casting call and invited people of all different political parties to come and react/give their opinion. FBE has such a big platform. It would be smart of them to have a more diverse in thought cast.
Hermy ASMR What they are saying is this cast is all from the LA area and all of them generally lean left. They are saying it would have been nice of FBE to cast some republicans or people who lean more conservative to get a wider range of views and thoughts.
@@hermyasmr i was referring to how there wasn't much diversity in the opinions of those in the video. They essentially stated the US should restrict guns or ban them outright. It would be nice to have some right-leaning perspectives here that are more for looser gun control and for gun rights in order to get a better picture of the current political division of this topic.
Because this who pageant, and I emphasize pageant, is propaganda and loaded to say no da rather than truly inform anyone. Their breakdown if the Federal Laws are flawed and disingenuous
People didn't read the Australian law properly. It said the *maximum sentence* was life imprisonment. It doesn't mean that's definitely the sentence everyone who breaks the law receives.
TheBlackiwid the difference is it’s harder to kill someone with a knife or bat which is a reason why there are strict gun laws, you are more likely to survive when you are threatened with a knife then a gun.
@@peter-paulkutschlojenga7336 Times change but your rights DO NOT without the proper legal amendment of the constitution. I would never give any government the right to dictate the basic fundamental human right to self preservation. Especially when there is no evidence to suggest that gun control would result in decreased violent crime. I agree that these mass shootings are horrible and something should be done particularly with mental heath and gun education. But the fact is the US is the most armed population and not even in the top 10 per capita for mass shootings and we are not even in the top 25 for gun deaths. We are behind countries like Norway and France. I encourage you to do your research, and educate yourself before begging your government to take away your rights.
@@peter-paulkutschlojenga7336 no our founding fathers knew in the future people would forget what this nation was built on and what it will take to defend from enemies both foreign and domestic. I will not live in peaceful slavery to have a government that doesn't care about my life control it.
@@peter-paulkutschlojenga7336 that is very wise and true. the more freedom you have the less safe you are and vice versa. if we give up all our freedom because we think it will make us more safe we will be giving someone else the power to hurt us whenever they want. be that the government or some illegal asshole with a gun.
I'm sorry but this is hard to watch, a lot of the arguments made in the first few minutes when the arguments presented are easily rebutted and some aren't even willing to acknowledge the validity of opposing arguments.
I'd also like to acknowledge the first argument where she uses drunk driving. It's a great example, the tool involved isn't the problem the person is, we don't view someone's alcohol consumption records before letting them purchase a car. It's the same concept with guns. Every state does have the right to treat guns how they want, but they can't create a policy that conflicts with the amendments or constitution.
Alan Carroll not much is false but it’s mainly the fact that they are clearly a little uneducated when it comes to gun laws. Even the pair who have guns themselves don’t seem to have much knowledge on guns. The lady that said she owned a pistol, said she wants AKs banned even though civilian AKs and Handguns (and also most hunting rifles) are SEMI-AUTO (1 tiggerpull= 1 bullet). Making pretty much all civilian/semi auto guns serve exactly the same purpose.
Serve First Die Second Gun education shouldn’t matter if you don’t want a gun. It only matters to those who have them. I don’t need to know shit about a gun if I don’t use one. Gun education is not the problem. Clearly the people doing the mass shootings know enough about them to kill multiple people. I don’t need to know that AR doesn’t mean assault rifle, I need to not be shot by one...
@@gadiac89 too much to type out and theres also somw facts presented in a misleading way ill give an example the 3 day rule. The background check is instant it just checks your record the 3 day rule was made because its not legal to withhold a right without a legal justification in fact any wait can be lethal because most often they are buying a gun for defense against a possible threat. Waiting periods have gotten particularly women killed by stalking dangerous exes
Kids in the U.S. also used to bring guns to school as part of shooting clubs. There were plenty of guns around, but those mass school shootings just didn't happen nearly as often, so something changed..
R U Kidding? They never happened at all cause most kids had functional families at home and they didn’t have all the angst and identity issues that we have today. And those kids who did not had strong communities that would step in and “father” them. A lot of kids today have never been fathered at all....,just mothered.
I honestly think the sensationalizing done by the media is the reason it's so common. If it was never put on the news and thus put into people's minds, this wouldn't be happening.
If the media didn't release names, faces, or footage of the shooting or make it a massive deal then most of these people wouldn't shoot places up since there would be nothing to remember him by. The media feeds these shooters and makes them pseudo super stars by blowing their names up and covering the shooting all across the U.S.
@@arthurrimbaud7287 They're the reason no reasonable, common sense gun laws are being passed, and with their Republican ghouls in control of the House things aren't looking good...
Nathaniel Choi Anyone with a gun do a 24hr video without a gun. This will be shocking content 🙀 Please give a like for all to see. Spread this message also.
@@simonm4185 its part of the problem, anti gun crowd thinks criminals will obey laws if they write them, they are against a border wall and securing the border but they cant make the connection that its part of the problem we really have no idea whats coming and going through the borders, for every 10k that come across the border at least 1 is doing something illegal that doesnt sound like much but in miami one year we got 25k from cuba with the added benefit some were criminals turned loose by the cuban government to piss us off. Technically a brilliant idea give your criminals to someone else to deal with. Its not a simple problem that can be resolved by 8 people in a 10 minute video with a parental "take their toys away" solution the bigger problem has to go away first before people will put away their guns, people have to feel safe.
@@simonm4185 It's not about getting rid of guns. It's about trying to keep them away from people who shouldn't have them. People have to pass a lot of tests to get a driver's licence as well. You wouldn't let just any idiot drive a car. Why would you let just any idiot have a gun?
@@simonm4185 this happens everywhere criminals and gangs are always going to have guns. I dont know how bad and inhumane your mobs are but in my country they do not just go around shooting harmless day to day citizens as they have nothing to gain from this. Our gangs have them to protect them and there illegal business from other gangs and probably police. That's where your police force needs to come in to play. We do have gang wars just brarely or never involves normal citizens. We might as well have no laws if you look at it that way.
110% wrong. There is no such thing as the gun show loop hole. At all gun shows only licensed dealers can sell guns. And all dealers must do a background check.
Not a single person in this video knew anything about guns. And most of the statistics were either completely false or heavily construed to fit their naratives.
In United States it is very possible to get a weapon, so far this year there have been more than 250 mass shootings by people who mostly carried weapons legally, just because in a place apparently without weapons (it is actually easy to get weapons in Brazil) There are also murders doesn't mean that having them is the solution or less worse
You have to be 25, and not have a criminal record. You need a license to carry a firearm in public that costs less than what most Americans pay to license their car. Citizens can obtain a license to carry an automatic weapon in Brazil. So harder regulation than America but not even remotely impossible. Like the US Brazil has more guns than people. Also Brazil's 2005 gun regulation saw firearms deaths dropped steeply then rose sharply when it became legal to carry handguns in public.
@@juruhime Consider this, the vast majority of shootings happen in or near cities. Do you know why? Because guns aren't allowed in or near cities. And the law abiding citizens will GASP abide the law and not carry guns. Now picture this, I am a bad person (possibly on drugs) who has no concern for the no gun law. So I keep a gun in my waistband. One day I decide to shoot some people. SO I go to me most densly populated place I can find and pen fire killing over 20 people. The police are on the way but not here yet. So I hop into a car and run away. There is a problem here. No one in that crowd was able to stop me because I had a gun and they didn't. And the police can't be everywhere at all times. This situation is the exact reason why I advocate for my 2nd amendment rights.
@@juruhime well it is far easier to get a gun here and we only have like 10000 murders per year. 90% of which are committed with illegal guns. If it was easier to get a gun, the rate would go down. Firearms save up to 3 million lives per year.
It's not against guns in many countries. They're still allowed as a hobby or for hunting purposes. The rules about it are strict to prevent accidents and easy access. It's not impossible for a sane human being to get a gun if they wanted to. It's just not like buying something in a super market.
@@simmerke1111 European gun laws are incredibly strict, even with hunting purposes. People are against it and dont think the American laws help them in a good way. It only causes trouble, and death. The chance at a mass-shooting in the US is 125% a day. Like wth?
No it's not? It's about people walking out in the street not having to worry to walk in the wrong place at the wrong time. Do you seriously believe that a government would rather kill their entire population than to give in? Even if you take America as an example. Which is ran like a business. Their product is their workforce, their market and their tax laws. If the workforce/market (the people) rallied against it. They would have to give in. That's what happened in my country in the 70's, the people stood up without weapons or violence. And that government stepped down, the people got what they were due. It's stupid to think a weapon earns you respect or power. It just shows that you have no good intent or means for discussion.
European laws are the strictest. My Uncle had an antique German Luger pistol that didn't fire taken away from him because its a gun even though it doesn't fire
True. In fact, virtually all of the mass shooters we've had in the last 15 or so years who actually purchased their firearms (as opposed to stealing them) did so through licensed gun shops which required the shooters to submit to and pass one (or more) federal background checks. With the exception of a select few who passed the background checks when they legally shouldn't have (due to clerical error or failure to transfer relevant information to authorities) all of the mass shooters had nothing in their records that would have prevented them from passing the background check.
@@OmnipresentCow bravo. I'm from Maine and the same is true here. We are a right to carry state with few restrictions and our murder rate is almost as low as New Hampshire.
If you wanted a genuine conversation to begin about firearms and the laws/regulations around them, you should have at least brought in someone who is highly educated on the topic to provide counterpoints and clarification. The speakers in this video are severely lacking in facts and they don't have anyone there to put them in the right direction.
@@Dakarn don't really need the person to be conservative... don't even need the person to be pro-gun... just need the person to be extremely well educated on the topic.
OMG did she really just say that there aren't background checks at gunshows!? I'm going to the wrong gunshows then. EVERY gunshow I have been to does a background check.
Truly, I understand this sentiment, and I agree. But police forces are some of the most understaffed jobs in America, because the only people that want to do it are those genuinely interested in protecting people, and those that want the power. Guess which of those groups tend to continue on their career path when they encounter the other group.
1. They aren't gonna bring in people from outside the state... that would take a lot more effort, money, and time than just using someone in California. 2. Yeah, they viewed laws from other countries to see the US equivalent. That was kinda the point of the video.
i find it funny that they preface the video by saying “we include multiple perspectives” and then have one gun owner and even he disagrees with america’s gun control as it is now
Maybe that's because agreeing with a situation where you live in a country where there are pretty much daily mass shootings, is a position that is so ridiculous and fringe it is very hard to find someone who had that position?
@@AhsimNreiziev maybe the fact that mass shootings aren't happening the way people think is a big part. The US defines mass shootings differently than any other country because there is no one definition. The numbers are being swelled by false data points that nobody would consider a mass shooting. That's not too mention the fact that most gun violence is gang based.
+[Alistair Grey] In the United States, a mass-shooting is defined as a gun-related crime where at least 4 people die due to gun shots. Having 4 or more people *die* due to a single act of gun violence, every day, year after year, and be of the opinion that this is an acceptable situation, is an extremely fringe position no matter which way you slice it. You should also look up the recent clip of Andrew Yang speaking to a mother of a child killed by a gun. As Yang says in the clip, a situation like that mother describes should not be able to exist. Not anywhere in the world, but especially not in the United States of America.
@@alistairgrey5089 substituting a problem for a problem still leaves a problem. Fact of the matter is that America has the highest rate of gun violence in the world, and unless that changes this issue still requires a solution.
@@Misosoup99 It does, because it underscores the fact that these people have no knowledge and thus no right to be talking about firearms. Should I go ask bus drivers about how to fly an airplan? No. Why not? Because they are completely unqualified to speak on the subject as are most of the politician that try to ban weapons. They know nothing about them yet they are "all bad", and from your comment you have no authority to speak on it either.
@@Misosoup99 Dude, I'm from California and these people personify ignorance of the laws. Very few have an actual idea how the laws are actually written and employed, plus their use to getting screwed by the Californian government.
Whether or or not the military uses the guns or not doesn’t really matter. I think it’s more of how deadly could the gun be. Ya know if we’re talking big double digit number in casualties in like two or three minutes that might be a problem.
Seeing the South African law is interesting. Cape Town, South Africa has been declared a war zone because of the number of gang related shootings and killings but I guess Cape Town has a GANG problem and not necessarily a GUN problem.
Pert of the problem with restricting gun purchases based off of mental health is that we're basically running parallel to the actual problem. We as a country, and seemingly as a planet, lack a robust and comprehensive system for addressing mental health all across society. Fixing that would go much further toward preventing mass shootings, and not fixing it leaves us ill-equipped to decide what mental state is and isn't grounds for restricting access to guns. It's almost as if we're treating the symptom and not the problem. _Hmmmmmm._
Landon Hagan. Very true. So much for the fallicy of all that HIAP (Health In All Policies) requirements under the UN, and that we all signed onto after the Ottawa charter. The ones that make all countries responsible for human rights abuses, fair treatments & just laws..and that all policies & laws be made with health, (all kinds, mental, physical, spiritual) and established best practices in relevant fields, being formost requirements in their passing, or continuing to exist as legitimate laws to govern people. Most countries in the world are signatories to it now, and not just the biggest, or 1st world ones either. And when i was studying my Enrolled Nursing course, i became aware of just how much both is, in some areas & regards..but also NOT in others, being enforced, or even taken seriously. Came across more than a few double standards of the kinds you've touched on here myself, and often wondered (Especially as a pro-gun owner in Australia!) About many of those issues myself. Asked lots of questions too..never been given anything even remotely like a legitimate answer yet.. The closest if been given to an honest answer so far, is that its far too big & widespread a problem for 'only laws & policies' to fully change, even over time.. But mostly it comes down to 'political viability' issues, and that the 'current problems' re: mental health standards, are not issues anyone wants to tackle, or fund.. Or be left holding the bag for, or their name left attached to its potential failures. "It's not quite bad enough, or broken enough, for us to need to mess with 'fixing' it yet.." The many who fall through the cracks are considered "accidental collateral damage" of the system, and not for any one person/title/politician to be accountable for.. Hell, we cant even fix serious problems of 'ambulance ramping' en mass, (lined up, waiting their turn, on the emergency IN ramp) at our capital city hospital, on any given day.. Much less the myriad of mere 'mental health issues', which are a much less concerning area (politically) for the masses here. Until it gets used as a catch all excuse to legally steal our rights & private property, falsely and without any proof or due process, because the system isn't even coping for the actual people with known, medically established mental health issues, much less any real (or even demonstrated) ability to provide real due process of law & accusations against gun owners. There is no real protections for gun rights here at any level, now. It is intentionally being stripped away, and used AGAINST you now, despite descrimination supposedly being illegal. I can't descriminate: but everyone else can about my private property & how i use it..we already have far too many intrusive laws for that! And I've had a gut full of it. So much for bwing "free people" in a free & domocratic country..its hard enough to be treated like a "real person" anymore..much less respect us as a 'gun' owner. As if ownership of privately owned property (of any kind), is something we have to ask the permission of strangers for..in any capacity..much less our very private homes! Ever wondered how horrified most hoplophobes would be, if they really knew just how many of the poeple they rely on every day..are shooters & gun owners? From the wardsman taking you down to X-ray, to the surgeon doing live-saving NICU work on their premature baby, to the taxi driver taking you home..to your child's ballet or gymnastics instructor..to the builders & electricians that build, plan, create and power your elitest little worlds, to the saw millers that made your beautiful wood homes & furnishings.. What if we all, one day soon decide to draw a line of our own? And refuse you, to dictate what rights, freedoms and even private property or classes you can attend in our own country instead.. What if we decided that you cannot own your semi-automatic transmission motor vehicles anymore, either..hmm? Learn to drive a real car, in full, to a high standard of competency.. What if that firefighter decided he won't help save tyrants & those who willfully aid them, vote for them..to steal from us, to interfere like slithering asps, even in our private lives & homes, and our private property.. Who vote against freedoms of arms. You go to any other country on earth, where that is the established rule of the land, and i guarantee..you won't wanna live there yourself.
@@DanielOrteez Your response is very short-sighted. Have you watched the news lately? Venezuelans gave up their guns to the government and they are now being slaughtered and starved because they want the current regime to give up their power.
i wish we would focus as a species on individuals mental health as well as their physical health, since we are probably the only species where are mental health can matter more because of our higher thought processes
They’re blaming video games again... games don’t have anything to do with it. It’s just easier to blame games than to actually deal with the issue. You can’t just ban guns because that’s not how it works. They should actually you know do better at background checks and make it so you can’t just easily have access. A lot of the people who do bad things like this have mental health issues and they shouldn’t be aloud to have access to that, and for they’re comment on there’s no background checks at gun shows that’s not true there are I’ve worked some and witnessed background checks happening at gun shows when I go to help run the books with my dad. It takes 15-30 minutes if everything goes well sometimes it takes 30-40 it depends honestly.. it all comes down to education and training.
Matthew Brown except they did. Look in your history books. But the media is placing the blame on gaming which is unfortunate. Every time there’s a shooting or any threat someone somewhere in the media tries to make that the excuse.
Raja1938 I’m saying nobody is defending the reason we have or don’t have these laws. Technically there ideas are different but they’re all from the left side.
@@Raja1938 people on the left still defend the 2nd amendment, to a certain extent, but i want to see people on their defend the 2nd amendment, ar15s, and ak47s. You know the whoe shabang
@@user-lc4iy4wj6w Lol. Do it here. Defend them. Tell me why you, and every citizen of the US or whatever other country, should have access to automatic, military grade weaponry?
I’m all for common sense gun legislation but you guys should have found at least one person who is really pro 2nd amendment to offer a more balanced perspective.
I’m pro 2nd amendment and young but I know a lot and agree with you it just has to be agreed on and people that know what they are talking about need to do it not people that make up facts
3:55 that’s wrong. That is not factual. You cannot buy a firearm in Nevada and go back to California. California is one of the only states where you can’t do that. They will literally tell you wherever you’re buying the firearm that you cannot transport it to California. You can’t even buy it if you’re a resident of California!! And also what they fail to mention is that Australia has banned guns that’s why this law is so strict. It’s like transporting drugs in a sense.
Simi not necessarily. It depends on the gun. The style. The magazine. The bullet button. The stock. There’s a lot of things that can deny your purchase. If you attempt to buy an AR that has a bump stock attachment in Texas and you live in Nevada your purchase will be denied because of the recent ban of them due to the Las Vegas shooting. Many states also have the bullet button law that don’t let you eject the magazine from the gun. You can’t buy assault rifles out of state if u live in New York. Like I said there’s many factors that can contribute to you being able to purchase a firearm. The attachments can cause ur purchase to be denied because in your resident state it’s illegal. Same as the style of firearm shotgun, pistol, etc. In essence to address your statement, no not only one state. Each state has different laws which effect the legality of purchases in other states.
Simi also the point of America is we kick as together, but like DC need to just leave idc about trump and Hilary just don’t start wars are let us handle day to day, STATES
@@Carolineintoodeep1288 Yeh see a lot of people just assume that life is life and say its too harsh but they dont know that life is different in each country
Yeah but there's a difference between your own opinion and "believing in someone elses opinion". Seen so many people who don't actually have opinions who just follow others because they don't care or want learn orbmake one themselves
It's a cute thought.. but only until different opinions begin affecting people in the real world. Nobody is entitled to an opinion just for the sake of it. They should only be entitled to an *informed* opinion. This is clearly a major problem in the world, and it shouldn't be brushed aside by these kinds of comments.
there was no discussion here... there was no one ith a different opinion who knew what they were talking about with guns. this is such a waste of time.
Dear FBE, To prevent group think, try to pair reactors with similar personalities or age bracket. Sometimes it's obvious a reactor is a little less opinionated because the other is either seen as older/wiser or dominating the conversion
Guns are very strictly regulated in Sweden. Swedes must get an individual license for every firearm. Prospective gun owners submit the application directly to the police. To obtain the license, you have to show that you have a specific need for a firearm, like hunting, sport shooting, or collecting guns. A license may be granted for protection, but in practice, these types of licenses are almost never granted. You also have to pass an exam or have been a member of a shooting club for at least six months. Weapons and ammunition must be stored in approved gun safes. There are significant penalties for breaking these rules.
Sweden, the country with 10 million people and twice the rapes per million than the USA. Slow clap. I think you are missing the point, say all those laws be put in the place in the USA, not saying that some of them shouldn't, what would happen. I mean its not as if 300 plus million guns in the USA that are known would possibly be easily acquired illegally. Some of your laws, I agree with. Passing an exam 100%. Individual license, ey don't see how it would do much. Storing something that you want for quick protection in a safe, eyy. Having the government choose if YOuR REASON for wanting a firearm is good enough, fuck off.
Yeah. that's stupid, no offense. I shouldn't have to prove to the police that I "need" protection, especially when I live miles away from the Sheriff's Dept and it would take an hour for an adequate response to arrive. "You need a reason" no thanks.
Leonard Chornomaz i know. That’s what I’m saying. One of the idiots in the video pulled the old “the constitution wasn’t written for modern weapons” argument. But it was written for anyone to have any weapon imaginable. Including assault rifles, nukes, etc. But of course i don’t think people should be able to own nukes and shit like that. But I’m just saying technically any restrictions on weapons are unconstitutional
A tyrannical government is possible. Who is the freest country in the world? America, why? Because ppl with guns keep the government in check, not the other way around.
I feel that not mentioning that many state laws make getting guns far more difficult than the base federal laws and asking questions designed to instigate a certain response is a very unfair way to show this discussion. Being ambiguous with your stance when it clearly is in favor of more gun laws is dishonest as well.
@@TheZaros666 It actually is that Crowder never does one of those in an uncontrolled environment, he does go to liberal colleges but he i surrounded by the conservative-leaning students that forms a mob-like mentality and he has policemen around. Think why he never does actual debates in person (when both sides are actually prepared and not on the fly) and in the few time when his strategy doesn't work, you can see that he doesn't know how to debate on equal footing and relies on insulting his opponent so the conservative students around him go "oooohhh" and cut the debate early so he can just get to a student that is not prepared and rinse and repeat
My teacher was explaining where to go during a fire and during a tornado at the beginning of the school year, and a student asked where we would go if there was a lockdown and the teacher said that she won’t tell us until it happens because one of us could be the reason we‘re in a lockdown.
beginning of the school year we practiced duck and cover for civil defense. The overpressure blast number where the windows blow out is something like 1/2 Lb per square inch.
Although this is a great example of how the populace is informed it also shows that we clearly need better, more informed education. If we properly educated the populace, this conversation would actually mean something.
Whenever FBE says they're trying to have a 'diverse' set of opinions, they always disappoint. It's always just 1 person when they have so much more in their cast.
Right! But that would make to much sense, you mean to say that you must be educated on a subject to pass effective legislation. Not to mention the drop in injury and death rates by accidental discharges.
And bring trap club back hell my senior year I and about 40 other students to a shotgun to school and most of us decided just left it and the ammo in our trucks instead of putting it in the safe provided for trap club cause trap was after school never had a school shooting or even accidental shooting
Harder to indoctrinate people into gun control if they are educated. Plus firearms education inherently exposed people to guns earlier and gun control proponents hope to sway you to their side before you ever have any real life experience with guns.
In Hawaii, we are required to take a gun safety class before getting a permit to purchase a handgun. In class we learn to shoot with different types of guns because we don’t know what type fits for each person. After we get the permit from the gun store we have to bring that permit with the type of gun that you want to buy to the police station to get approved. After getting approved, we bring the permit back and get the gun, then bring it back to the police station to register it. So that’s basically what the process is here
Shocking since Hawaii was literally colonized by America and is one of few states where you can't, in practice as shown by numbers OG approved licenses, get a carry permit.
You really should do more research...or Any research. 1. It is against federal law to buy a gun in a state you don’t live in. If you want to buy a gun from another state, it has to be transferred to a dealer in your state, and you have to go through a background check. Additionally, it’s against the law to do a personal sale across state lines. 2. Background checks are required to buy a gun from ANY dealer. Also there are background checks at gun shows. They include mental health and police records.
Thank you! I'm only half-way through the vid and already so disappointed FBE... been a long time fan (even of the few-and-far between serious vids like this), but you're quoting a bs news outlet like Vox instead of pulling data from primary sources? Shame.
My family owns a wide range of guns and on our last vacation everyone shot every gun that they where physically capable of, that included kids from ages 5 to 13. Half of them are in safety classes and all of them showed the right responsibilities needed when being around the guns and handling them. Knowledge is power. I’m not afraid of guns, I’m afraid of the uneducated and the criminals behind the gun
@@johnnymarinara3797 Because you are an idiot. Safety begins early. Just like teaching your kid that the stove is hot. You do it early so they DON'T hurt themselves or someone else. Most child related gun shots are usually because of curiosity and a lack of knowledge. If there is a gun in the house and you have a child, they better damn well know everything that can happen with it and what can happen if they touch it. Also I leaned to shoot rifles and shotguns in the Boy Scouts before I was 12. So get out of here with you paranoid BS.
Mental health is often used as a scapegoat when it comes to this issue. But in reality, people with mental health issues are more likely to be victims of violent crime rather than the perpetrators. And only 4% of recent shooters have been shown to have signs of mental health issues. The problem is most to do with socio-economic issues.
It takes someone really messed up in the head to go out and shoot a bunch of people. That’s not just some angry dude. That’s someone who is mentally ill and quite possibly deranged.
Founding fathers let people have cannons that could take down a ship. They knew there guns at the time and let people have them, so as long as they were trained and proper with a weapon. By the same left logic, we can have free speech so as long as it pertains to ink and paper.
@@nunchucktaylor3488 because in the 1700's private citizens had cannons and entire warships with cannons. Do you wanna know what will cause more damage; an AR-15 or a warship/cannon?
BadKitty NoTuna An AR. Because cannons are incredibly hard to mobilize especially with only one person (I’d say impossible actually) and much like muskets you have minimum 10 seconds between shots (original muskets took over a minute to reload and at their height it was 3 shots a minute) as opposed to milliseconds. And I’m gonna go ahead and say that exactly zero boats or warships were ever used to mow down people at school or in a church or at a concert. I’m confused, were you being sarcastic or are you so stupid that you actually think that’s a logical comparison?
Assault is a verb, AR15 stands for Armalite Rifle model 15. People say assault rifle because it sounds menacing. Anything can be an assault weapon if used to assault someone. If I throw a paper ball at you, it’s assault paper. If I hit you with a golf club it’s an assault club. And so on.
@@sotohc96 yes the ar15 was created for the military but you know what they also make ar15 for civilian s so that literally doesn't make any sense. Not to mention the first semi auto rifle was not built for.the military it for civilians before the military picked them up
First off, these "weapons of war" (lol), are semi-automatic (one trigger pull = one bullet) same as virtually every single other gun manufactured this day and age. Secondly, if someone is threatening my life, I want the fight to be as lopsided as possible in my favor.
@@sotohc96 And if you remove guns nothing changes. look at the UK they're knife attacks now and acid attacks. not to mention mass shooter haven't dropped at all even after the assault weapon ban from the government. In fact most people who own guns are not going to go out and shoot other people. In fact a large majority of us like to shoot guns and use it to defend our families. Cause sometimes the police take too long and or have short resources. Take a look at the LA-riots korean shop owners were getting unjustified hate and started to loot and the police couldn't do anything and the koreans used their 2nd amendment rights and saved themselves. not to mention removing guns from the USA also weakens us, it's kinda funny how in our history not one fucking country has decided to invade us at all, because all of our citizens have guns and armed. not to mention if the government does get corrupted we have a fighting chance at rebuilding. look at north korea, the people there CANNOT fight back against the corrupt government they have no weapons or anything for that matter to take back and lead a new government.
I just read through some comments and I think it’s scary that nobody brought up that fact that they agreed that if you are “accused” of domestic violence you should not be able to get a gun. Accused, not convicted.
Just something to think about Walmart said they are going to take “violent “ video games off the shelf which have been proven to have little to no correlation to violence but in some locations they still sell guns
That weird Artist Video games aren’t a constitutional right and Walmart doesn’t sell modern sporting weapons...they sell the type of gun everybody is supposedly in favor of keeping like granddaddy’s shotgun or rifle.
If nobody had a gun then you wouldn't need one to protect yourself and no regular civilian needs deadly guns whatever about a small one in case of robbery etc and here in Ireland you have to apply for a gun license and get it renewed regularly
when the second amendment was written 1. we didn't have automatic weapons 2. they were a rebellion that had just rebeled against your parent country and were basically at war with a bunch of people for good sack threbis a famous painting of someone on a horse riding through villages yelling that the British are coming like for good sake WE ARENT AT WAR WITH ANYONE IN YOUR DAMN COUNTRY
Sadly it is not as simple as "nobody has a gun" because you can take guns away from law abiding citizens however it is very easy for a determined criminal to purchase a gun ILLEGALLY with gun trafficking and smuggling. You would be effectively ensuring nobody good has a gun but bad people do. It is similar to marijuana in a sales sense. When its legal good people can purchase it and own it but when it was illegal it was very common among bad people as it became lucrative to sell it illegally. By banning guns you create a market for illegal guns that only bad people buy.
I wish you would have put out a casting call for Republicans to come in a react/give their opinion. It would be nice to see a cast more diverse in thought.
The 2nd Amendment is not meant to be a privilege given to the people by the government, it is a right of the PEOPLE which restricts the power of the government against the people.
Which pretty much makes it absolutely outdated and pointless. This was meant for an early America, and people cling to this because they have no other defense for as why they should be able to own a gun. The 2nd Amendment NEVER gave the power for citizens to simply own a gun, it gave them a right to own a gun to defend against the Government, which isn't even a threat these days. The 2nd Amendment is why were are in this hellhole in the first place.
The Second Amendment allows for a "well regulated" militia. Gun control is not inherently unconstitutional; in fact, under Article 1 Section 8, you can find the words "the Congress shall have the Power . . . To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia." The Elastic Clause establishes that Congress has the ability to create laws and enforce this power. Therefore, the constitution does not prevent gun control and regulation, but instead encourages it.
@@adamn7516 Yes, yes you can. Here's how to get one. www.pewpewtactical.com/how-to-buy-tank/ Another link or 2 for you www.dailydot.com/unclick/operational-tank-for-sale-armslist/ www.drivetanks.com/own-one/
A gun is a tool and always has been a tool, the idea of limiting the firearm is absurd to me but the limiting the person is a wonderful idea. I don’t think that going after the guns is the way to go in the slightest. I understand both sides but stripping the people of their firearms will not work it might start a civil war. I do believe that more in depth mental screening would help limit some of the guns falling into the wrong hands. Now that being said ninety percent of the firearms that are in the civilian market aren’t up to military standard and full autos are incredibly hard to get and further more I don’t think most people understand the capabilities of the military.
I was in school not far away from the STEM school in Colorado during the shooting. You can’t describe the feeling not even being there but knowing that people, kids, trying to go to school and get an education going to school not knowing that it will be the scariest day of your life feels like. It’s just so frustrating.
Sharon seems to have the most common sense of them all. She knows the arguments and counterarguments. She knows what's realistically possible and what is best for everyone. She acknowledges what people's rights are, but wants it to be orderly. Not sure why more people can't be like that.
There is something we need to see, and that is how we tend to simplify things. Media plays a huge role in here, since people normally wont do research on their own. So, if you have easily accessible platforms(media) blastinh the negative side of gun use, the result is quite obvious.
@aaron guest You don't need to know anything about guns to know what laws will work to protect citizens, what laws won't, and what is deemed unconstitutional.
Most people just believe what they hear or told with no fact checking. Media regularly spreads false information then later puts out a correction, no one hears about. This whole first to put information out before knowing the actual information is a problem.
Okay that’s better than the amount of gun deaths🤣States with non strict gun control laws have 3 times as many deaths than states with strict gun control laws. You people are blind even with statistics
This is disappointing. Not the laws, but the REACT channel is disappointing. Of course there arent going to be gun laws at the federal level because that is something that is done per state. Reminder: we are a union, not one giant state. Not mentioning the comparable state laws is lazy at best and manipulating at worst. I'll retitle the video: "Do you know about gun laws in America? because we dont, and you still wont by the end of this video."
Interesting how all the comments saying "terrible video" are from people fairly informed on the subject and all the people saying "great video" are clueless about the subject.
Have you ever thought of something called "different opinion"? You can be educated just as much, but if you value different stuff, your opinion will differ. But yeah, let's call everyone with different opinion than mine "uninformed".
False Name there’s a line between being educated with different views and perspectives and then there are these guys who are not educated on the subject matter making these view points based on biased falsified informations.
Singapore: look up "Scheduled Weapons Act". The only people who have firearms here are law enforcement and the Military.(accurately: *Arms and Explosives act* ) I mean, sure, we've had a case of a gilded boyfriend smuggling his SAR-21 rifle out of camp, but that happened back in 2007, and the armed forces(and in turn, even the police) has since stepped up on security protocols.
Many Europian countries dont have laws that allow people to buy guns. This way the only people allowed to have them are the police and the millitary. We put trust in them to make sure people dont illigally own guns. In the Netherlands we have an indirect democracy. Parties need 2/3 of all votes to be able to change the "ground laws" (freedom of speech, discrimination is illigal ect. and the whole political system, there is also a counsil that makes sure the new laws dont interfere with existing ones. ) Our military is also very small and gets supervised/controlled by the politics. It would be very hard for a tirrany to start within the netherlands. The number of murders is very low in the Netherlands and I feel very safe here.
It depends from country to country. In places like the UK, you cannot own any firearm at all. You can't even take pocket knives with you. In my country, you can own a 6.35 or .32 S&W, but first you need to do psychological tests and train with said guns. They're branded as "personal defense" guns. You can also own rifles but they're meant for hunting.
@@dalejanse8577 In Finland many people have hunting rifles/shotguns, but they need a licence to hunt AND a licence for the gun, which is renewed annually. No handguns or anything more powerful than that. We have hardly any gun violence, and not even all of our cops carry guns.
In the Netherlands we have a 6 month period of evaluation so you are you are aware what a gun can do. I want to learn how to shoot but the hoops have stopped me from actively precuing it. I would learn to shoot for sport. Not for protection.
I can’t believe the green hair girl said she thinks mass shooters aren’t mentally ill. Shows u just how stupid the ppl in this video really are, n if u can’t see it ur stupid
2A is not about self defense or hunting. The 2A is there to protect the citizens of the United States from the government. I would really suggest that the staff/reactors of FBE read the Federalist Papers.
What I prefer is a licensing gun law in United States like what Switzerland and the Czech Republic have, basically have requirements like going through a gun safety training course, a mental evaluation test, a literacy test and a strong background check, there would be a few different types of gun licenses from a basic gun license in which a person can own a pistol and a low powered shotgun to a advanced gun license in which a person can own a assault rifle / machine gun and be able to be allowed to open carry ( FYI the people that were most likely getting a advanced gun license are anyone that's a member of the military, law enforcement, and security ), also anyone who already owns a gun or more with not committing any type of crime would be grandfathered a gun license.
Don't complicate what is simple: The 2A was writen in 1791, when people still had powder-bang-sticks for guns. It's the 21st century now. Time's have changed and now people in your country are finally catching up with the rest of the world. The problem's clearly much larger than it once could have ever been, and rules need to be changed. People are basing their facts on something, so there must be a problem, right?
@@fluffysnatch4689 The particular gun law I'm naming is what Switzerland and Czech Republic has in which those countries are nowhere close to being in tyranny with also low homicide rates and low crime rates, you act like I want to ban guns in general when in reality my comment made it obvious that I don't.
Im sorry but I don't know what in your mind makes you think and needing a militarized weapon for "destructive" animals is okay Let alone the idea of using a gun on a "destructive" animal. if there was a "destructive" animal and it needed to be handled, there are plenty of other ways to handle it without using a militarized weapon.
I really miss Christina Grimmie, she was an angel on earth. Tragic loss that I still can't get over. However, during this episode I noticed that nobody was talking about defensive gun use or stating any statistics about it which is very important when talking about guns
Gotcha brother, with extra sauce: Firearms are used more often defending lives than used to take lives by criminals. Defensive gun use estimates of annual uses ranging from about 500,000 to more than 3 million. Simply, guns save lives, not take. CDC for reference: www.nap.edu/read/18319/chapter/3 As for "assault weapons" and banning them, the FBI did a study of the 90's Assault Weapons ban. They found it did nothing to prevent their criminal use, in fact they found handguns where used in the overwhelming majority of crimes with firearms while assault weapons where insignificant in use by comparison. FBI study for reference: dev.journalistsresource.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/UPennAssaultBan.pdf
We not gonna take away your rights but we want to make you earn the right? Then it's no longer a right. No one has the right to own or drive a car. But you have the right as a US citizen to keep and bare arms.
They literally got the first law wrong. You have to be a resident of the state to buy a gun. If you want to buy a gun out of state you have to get a certified seller to transfer the gun to another certified seller in your state. You can’t just buy a gun out of state like they are fireworks
What if I dont have a home or I travel in my country.??....come to slab city TRAVELL TO AN UNKNOWN PLACE....break down and surrounded by crack heads and criminals.....see what you believe when 911 puts you on hold...it wont matter what you believe when your dead because you could not defend yourself....
What military weapon can a civilian own. Answer you can not own a military weapon so why does everyone think that a law abiding citizen can own a military weapon
KillerNinja869 Exactly. Even those in active duty military or reserve don’t have access to their weapon off base. It is locked up. My family and close friends are all military, active and vets. The misinformation about firearms and the laws around them are hindering a solution.
Modern military weapons built after 1986 you can't, but ones built before that are available on the military surplus market (M1 Garand, K98 Mauser, BAR, Thompson etc.).
KillerNinja869 because you can. you can own military weapons made before 1986 and you can legally buy a kit to modify a gun to semi-automatic or automatic.
@@i.cantdrinkmilk most people cant afford military weapons before 1986 because the are so damn expensive. And i really don't think you can have a kit that can make per say an AR semi automatic and automatic because that would be very illegal to own.
In India it could take a person anywhere between 8 months to a year to get a license to purchase and carry a firearm. If ones background and health checkup comes back with issues. Then the application is either rejected or subjected to further scrutiny which might take another year .
@@8bhushan8 I find that to be reasonable inconvenience to bare for public security. i even like the fact that all fire arms have to deposited with licensed dealers before every election.
The Brady Bill was signed into law by Bill Clinton on November 30, 1993. James Brady was shot on March 30, 1981 (he lived and was there when Clinton signed the bill). The legislation was first introduced to Congress February 4, 1987. It was not a "someone important got shot and they immediately set about changing the laws." What the Brady Bill actually did was to mandate federal background check on firearm purchases in the US (FEDERAL, so no it doesn't change from state to state) It also set a 5 day waiting period until the implementation of the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) in 1998. For the background check the holder of a Federal Firearms License (FFL) initiates the background check by phone or computer. Most checks are determined within minutes. It does not take "way longer than 3 days" to get information on people where nearly all of our records are digitally stored.
That's actually completely false. Its also how Dylan Roof got his gun, despite that he shouldn't have been allowed to buy one. If a background check takes more than 3 days you are allowed to sell the gun anyway. Its called a default proceed. Yes for people with a clean record they are usually very quick, but for people with red flags they take much longer to investigate. So the default proceed rule primarily benefits criminals and there were over 300,000 default proceeds in 2016. So its actually pretty damn common Our lax guns laws are literally insane.
@@nerdstrangler4804 "Completely false?" Clean record or not most of them are very quick. Around 9% of cases require further investigation, so it's not that common. The FBI continues its investigations for up to 90 days, if it's determined that a transfer was made to a prohibited person the case is transferred to the ATF for firearms retrieval. To be clear I'm not against extending the waiting period on these default proceeds, but for the vast majority of cases they are resolved in under an hour.
Sorry to correct you but it's "were". Because "we're" is short for "we are". I just wanted to point it out bc I feel like a lot of people make that mistake.
A video about gun laws and the comment section isn't disabled.... Wow, you guys are brave. I'm almost afraid to scroll down.
I was thinking the same thing!! I was scrolling very slow through the comments even before watching the video. LOL
TheRepty818 Anyone with a gun do a 24hr video without a gun. This will be shocking content 🙀
Please give a like for all to see. Spread this message also.
Paul Escalona or how about anyone that doesnt have a gun, never bought a gun, never went through the process of purchasing a firearm, or even shot a gun, ACTUALLY GO THROUGH THE PROCESS YOURSELF AND GAIN MORE KNOWLEDGE ON GUNS. I'm from Alaska, we all grow up around guns, we learn from the beginning it is not a toy, it is a tool. There is so much mislead information about firearms, and nowadays pepl dont check sources enough. And the pepl making the sources havent ever done it in person lol
@@troyboi7662 Problem is what works in rural areas doesn't work in metropolitan areas and vice versa. You talk about what people learn in Alaska to get guns, yet in the big cities, none of that is required.
TheAwesomeKing86 great idea as well honestly would like to see this narrative. And the facts.
I find it shocking how little anyone in this video knows about gun laws.
or the majority of the comment section who agrees with them
They are there for a reason
Yes it is shocking how Americans do not know the legal law,it is shocking how They do not know that any law which violates the constitution of the United States of America is not legally law it is null and void.
It shows 95 % of Americans are dumbdown brainwashed sheep who actually believe weapons laws are legal in the United States of America,no weapons laws in America are legal law they are null and void they are in violation of the Supreme law of the land the United States constitution which overrides and supersedes all laws.
The right of the people,to keep and bear arms,shall not be infringed.
The second amendment is just like the first it presents two separate issues which are interconnected.
Its because they are Californians
Its the same for most of the people arguing about gun laws, half of them don't know shit.
Fun Fact: “AR” stands for armalite not assault rifle
Yeah
thank you
AlexKing666 fun fact u can’t just go buy a automatic gun 😖
everyone get on the ground now Fun Fact: The first ever villain to appear in a spider-man comic was the chameleon
surfitlive really very informational
That background check is ran every time somebody buys a new firearm it's not a one-time one and done
Passing a background check for each time you buy a new firearm is not enough, an owner of a single firearm can become a potential threat to others or himself even if they passed the background check the one time they bought the firearm...
@@DJVIDZ that's a bit of a leap from what he said lol. There's quite a bit u can do like having a license to own guns and having to renew that license every few years. That would even solve the loop holes where you can buy a gun without a check, if u needed a license in the first place.
LongdownConker u do need a License 😂😂😂 and u renew them every 30 days
LongdownConker and everywhere in the us you have to take the test all over again after 12 months like a gun owner
@@DJVIDZ is that a state or federal requirement?
These aren't multiple perspectives, they're all one perspective but put in a varied way.
Ora Nyan Exactly! They should have done a casting call and invited people of all different political parties to come and react/give their opinion. FBE has such a big platform. It would be smart of them to have a more diverse in thought cast.
Lol it's also not a reaction, these people have had these opinions for years...this should have been called. "Venting about Gun Laws"
Hermy ASMR What they are saying is this cast is all from the LA area and all of them generally lean left. They are saying it would have been nice of FBE to cast some republicans or people who lean more conservative to get a wider range of views and thoughts.
@@hermyasmr i was referring to how there wasn't much diversity in the opinions of those in the video. They essentially stated the US should restrict guns or ban them outright. It would be nice to have some right-leaning perspectives here that are more for looser gun control and for gun rights in order to get a better picture of the current political division of this topic.
No kidding....
"Please be respectful to one another in the comments."
**looks at comments**
...Yyyup. Nothing unusual here.
Anyone with a gun do a 24hr video without a gun. This will be shocking content 🙀
Please give a like for all to see. Spread this message also.
These AR-15s keep getting talked about, they are semi automatics, like your typical handgun. The military doesn't use them.
ikr, they were decomissioned since the 1900 ish time
Do they think that the military doesn't use handguns?
Yeah but it's fucked up that civilians have them
If you are talking semi-automatic rifles you are incorrect. They were still being used up until Vietnam with the M-14.
@@johnnymarinara3797 He was talking about the AR-15, not semiautomatic weapons in general.
I’m sorry just why are they using vox for most of there sources
I wondered if anyone was going to mention them using Vox as sources. I paused the video and debating if I even want to continue watching it.
VOX? That's an unbiased source. Lol.
Because they are biased
and Giffords Law Center....
Because this who pageant, and I emphasize pageant, is propaganda and loaded to say no da rather than truly inform anyone. Their breakdown if the Federal Laws are flawed and disingenuous
People didn't read the Australian law properly. It said the *maximum sentence* was life imprisonment. It doesn't mean that's definitely the sentence everyone who breaks the law receives.
@surfitlive You can defend yourself from a knife infinitely better than a gun, dickhead.
@TheBlackiwid most gun violence is gang violence so if you get rid of gang violence its about 1 to 1
@TheBlackiwid
The violent crime and murder rates have increased. The only thing that's gone down is gun crimes.
They also fail to recognize that the Australia law is only concerned with ILLICIT trafficking of firearms. It does not declare everything illegal.
TheBlackiwid the difference is it’s harder to kill someone with a knife or bat which is a reason why there are strict gun laws, you are more likely to survive when you are threatened with a knife then a gun.
"When you trade liberty to gain safety you gain neither and lose both." -Benjamin Franklin
he lived in a time when there weren't mass shootings everyday. Times change
@@peter-paulkutschlojenga7336 Times change but your rights DO NOT without the proper legal amendment of the constitution. I would never give any government the right to dictate the basic fundamental human right to self preservation. Especially when there is no evidence to suggest that gun control would result in decreased violent crime.
I agree that these mass shootings are horrible and something should be done particularly with mental heath and gun education. But the fact is the US is the most armed population and not even in the top 10 per capita for mass shootings and we are not even in the top 25 for gun deaths. We are behind countries like Norway and France. I encourage you to do your research, and educate yourself before begging your government to take away your rights.
@@peter-paulkutschlojenga7336 no our founding fathers knew in the future people would forget what this nation was built on and what it will take to defend from enemies both foreign and domestic. I will not live in peaceful slavery to have a government that doesn't care about my life control it.
@@peter-paulkutschlojenga7336 that is very wise and true. the more freedom you have the less safe you are and vice versa. if we give up all our freedom because we think it will make us more safe we will be giving someone else the power to hurt us whenever they want. be that the government or some illegal asshole with a gun.
he lived to witness like 3 different wars...
I'm sorry but this is hard to watch, a lot of the arguments made in the first few minutes when the arguments presented are easily rebutted and some aren't even willing to acknowledge the validity of opposing arguments.
I'm from Trinidad and Tobago, our murder rate is disgusting, no matter what gun laws the government holds, shooting still take place.
Sorry I cannot comprehend stupid....its called natural selection where I live
@@DrexelJoseph Agreed! Making guns harder to get isn't going to help them protect themselves.
@@benlegend5081 you seem to be unnecessarily antagonistic.
I'd also like to acknowledge the first argument where she uses drunk driving. It's a great example, the tool involved isn't the problem the person is, we don't view someone's alcohol consumption records before letting them purchase a car. It's the same concept with guns. Every state does have the right to treat guns how they want, but they can't create a policy that conflicts with the amendments or constitution.
Why dont you get an expert on weapons and gun laws so that way we (the viewer) and the reactors actually view the "facts" and see which is bs
What's was false in the video?
Alan Carroll not much is false but it’s mainly the fact that they are clearly a little uneducated when it comes to gun laws. Even the pair who have guns themselves don’t seem to have much knowledge on guns.
The lady that said she owned a pistol, said she wants AKs banned even though civilian AKs and Handguns (and also most hunting rifles) are SEMI-AUTO (1 tiggerpull= 1 bullet). Making pretty much all civilian/semi auto guns serve exactly the same purpose.
Serve First Die Second Gun education shouldn’t matter if you don’t want a gun. It only matters to those who have them. I don’t need to know shit about a gun if I don’t use one. Gun education is not the problem. Clearly the people doing the mass shootings know enough about them to kill multiple people. I don’t need to know that AR doesn’t mean assault rifle, I need to not be shot by one...
Alan Carroll almost the entire video
@@gadiac89 too much to type out and theres also somw facts presented in a misleading way ill give an example the 3 day rule. The background check is instant it just checks your record the 3 day rule was made because its not legal to withhold a right without a legal justification in fact any wait can be lethal because most often they are buying a gun for defense against a possible threat. Waiting periods have gotten particularly women killed by stalking dangerous exes
Kids in the U.S. also used to bring guns to school as part of shooting clubs. There were plenty of guns around, but those mass school shootings just didn't happen nearly as often, so something changed..
Gun free zones happened cause what do you know people don't shoot up places where anyone could have a gun on them.
R U Kidding? They never happened at all cause most kids had functional families at home and they didn’t have all the angst and identity issues that we have today. And those kids who did not had strong communities that would step in and “father” them. A lot of kids today have never been fathered at all....,just mothered.
I honestly think the sensationalizing done by the media is the reason it's so common. If it was never put on the news and thus put into people's minds, this wouldn't be happening.
@@audrinaxoxo033 there also media over-saturation. We think it's common because the media runs it 24 7
If the media didn't release names, faces, or footage of the shooting or make it a massive deal then most of these people wouldn't shoot places up since there would be nothing to remember him by. The media feeds these shooters and makes them pseudo super stars by blowing their names up and covering the shooting all across the U.S.
"I'm a big believer in 2nd Amendment rights."
Same guy: "Nobody should be allowed to have an AR-15."
That's called a Fudd
But that literally shows the American public in general is not as split on this issue. It’s the NRA that is at the core.
@@andredingstertsao WTF does the NRA have to do with gun violence?
@@arthurrimbaud7287 They're the reason no reasonable, common sense gun laws are being passed, and with their Republican ghouls in control of the House things aren't looking good...
a normal hand gun and an AR-15 are two different levels. AR-15 are war guns.. like the guy said who on earth are you going to war with?
*Rubs hands together* Oh boy! Time to jump into the rabbit hole that's also known as a TH-cam comment section flame war!
Nathaniel Choi Anyone with a gun do a 24hr video without a gun. This will be shocking content 🙀
Please give a like for all to see. Spread this message also.
@@paulescalona9153 you do know youtube frowns on gun content right? And demonitizes any videos containing gun content.
@@simonm4185 its part of the problem, anti gun crowd thinks criminals will obey laws if they write them, they are against a border wall and securing the border but they cant make the connection that its part of the problem we really have no idea whats coming and going through the borders, for every 10k that come across the border at least 1 is doing something illegal that doesnt sound like much but in miami one year we got 25k from cuba with the added benefit some were criminals turned loose by the cuban government to piss us off. Technically a brilliant idea give your criminals to someone else to deal with. Its not a simple problem that can be resolved by 8 people in a 10 minute video with a parental "take their toys away" solution the bigger problem has to go away first before people will put away their guns, people have to feel safe.
@@simonm4185 It's not about getting rid of guns. It's about trying to keep them away from people who shouldn't have them. People have to pass a lot of tests to get a driver's licence as well. You wouldn't let just any idiot drive a car. Why would you let just any idiot have a gun?
@@simonm4185 this happens everywhere criminals and gangs are always going to have guns. I dont know how bad and inhumane your mobs are but in my country they do not just go around shooting harmless day to day citizens as they have nothing to gain from this. Our gangs have them to protect them and there illegal business from other gangs and probably police. That's where your police force needs to come in to play. We do have gang wars just brarely or never involves normal citizens. We might as well have no laws if you look at it that way.
110% wrong. There is no such thing as the gun show loop hole. At all gun shows only licensed dealers can sell guns. And all dealers must do a background check.
TRUTH
seek?
@@jimklemens5018 learning how to spell. Lol
Sell
Complete BS. There are lots of videos out there where they prove that you can buy a gun instantly.
VIDEOGAMES ARE NOT THE PROBLEM
Agreed
OOOOH THANK U, the problem is that it is always easier to dare to blame someone else or something instead of ourselves.
Like no shit. It's all that damn rock and roll music. Elvis has corrupted the youth of America!
@@Hustin are you looking for an excuse to beat your kid?
New rule: Anyone who said video games are the problem loses their vote in this conversation
When ya boy says that the US military uses the Ak 47.........
Liberal detected
Not a single person in this video knew anything about guns. And most of the statistics were either completely false or heavily construed to fit their naratives.
thats bs and most of us know it
They do to a limited extent, one example is the Navy Seals adopted the Chinese Type56 as their official AK
Lincoln_tk somewhere out there... these people are voting for your laws...scary
The Australian law had a MAXIMUM of life sentence, not a mandatory life sentence.
It’s ok react is leftist
Unless I missed it. I didnt hear anyone in the video say anything about "mandatory life sentence".
in brazil its almost impossible to buy a gun legally, yet, 63.880 murders every year.
now think about how many there'd be if you could get them as easily as in the US
In United States it is very possible to get a weapon, so far this year there have been more than 250 mass shootings by people who mostly carried weapons legally, just because in a place apparently without weapons (it is actually easy to get weapons in Brazil) There are also murders doesn't mean that having them is the solution or less worse
You have to be 25, and not have a criminal record. You need a license to carry a firearm in public that costs less than what most Americans pay to license their car. Citizens can obtain a license to carry an automatic weapon in Brazil. So harder regulation than America but not even remotely impossible. Like the US Brazil has more guns than people. Also Brazil's 2005 gun regulation saw firearms deaths dropped steeply then rose sharply when it became legal to carry handguns in public.
@@juruhime Consider this, the vast majority of shootings happen in or near cities. Do you know why? Because guns aren't allowed in or near cities. And the law abiding citizens will GASP abide the law and not carry guns. Now picture this, I am a bad person (possibly on drugs) who has no concern for the no gun law. So I keep a gun in my waistband. One day I decide to shoot some people. SO I go to me most densly populated place I can find and pen fire killing over 20 people. The police are on the way but not here yet. So I hop into a car and run away. There is a problem here. No one in that crowd was able to stop me because I had a gun and they didn't. And the police can't be everywhere at all times. This situation is the exact reason why I advocate for my 2nd amendment rights.
@@juruhime well it is far easier to get a gun here and we only have like 10000 murders per year. 90% of which are committed with illegal guns. If it was easier to get a gun, the rate would go down. Firearms save up to 3 million lives per year.
I would love to see Mat from demolition ranch in this argument
He has a video on this topic.
@@gaminguploader98 Link?
Or Hickok45
sneeky name of the video ?
sneeky linkkkk??? I need it
I was thinking oh Christina Grimme while watching this even before she mention her. Her story gets me every time
Why werent there any European laws here? Because those are the most strict and almost 100% against guns?
It's not against guns in many countries. They're still allowed as a hobby or for hunting purposes. The rules about it are strict to prevent accidents and easy access.
It's not impossible for a sane human being to get a gun if they wanted to. It's just not like buying something in a super market.
@@simmerke1111 Gun control is about power, it's about the government wanting to keep their population under control both mentally and physically.
@@simmerke1111 European gun laws are incredibly strict, even with hunting purposes. People are against it and dont think the American laws help them in a good way. It only causes trouble, and death. The chance at a mass-shooting in the US is 125% a day. Like wth?
No it's not? It's about people walking out in the street not having to worry to walk in the wrong place at the wrong time.
Do you seriously believe that a government would rather kill their entire population than to give in? Even if you take America as an example. Which is ran like a business.
Their product is their workforce, their market and their tax laws. If the workforce/market (the people) rallied against it. They would have to give in. That's what happened in my country in the 70's, the people stood up without weapons or violence. And that government stepped down, the people got what they were due. It's stupid to think a weapon earns you respect or power. It just shows that you have no good intent or means for discussion.
European laws are the strictest. My Uncle had an antique German Luger pistol that didn't fire taken away from him because its a gun even though it doesn't fire
One of the biggest issues with the background check is the fact that most of these shooters do not have a criminal background.
True. In fact, virtually all of the mass shooters we've had in the last 15 or so years who actually purchased their firearms (as opposed to stealing them) did so through licensed gun shops which required the shooters to submit to and pass one (or more) federal background checks. With the exception of a select few who passed the background checks when they legally shouldn't have (due to clerical error or failure to transfer relevant information to authorities) all of the mass shooters had nothing in their records that would have prevented them from passing the background check.
Most shooters don't even buy guns from the store, they steal them or get them from the local drug dealer lol
Yeah, but then again most deaths aren't during mass shootings but gang on gang violence
They’re retarded tho
We should just outlaw murder...
Guns laws are different by state. It's pretty hard to generalize it.
Yet another problem with them, but whatever
@@OmnipresentCow bravo. I'm from Maine and the same is true here. We are a right to carry state with few restrictions and our murder rate is almost as low as New Hampshire.
17:16 correct me if I’m wrong but...
It’s Japan one of the most suicidal places in the world?
every state needs to be like kentucky where you say gun laws and they say what are those and then they say oh you mean that shit the feds make us do
If you wanted a genuine conversation to begin about firearms and the laws/regulations around them, you should have at least brought in someone who is highly educated on the topic to provide counterpoints and clarification. The speakers in this video are severely lacking in facts and they don't have anyone there to put them in the right direction.
Mishro22
It’s California. Conservatives are hard to find.
@@Dakarn don't really need the person to be conservative... don't even need the person to be pro-gun... just need the person to be extremely well educated on the topic.
@@Mishro22 thats and im pretty sure there are afew yt gun channels based in cali
@@Mishro22 Someone who's not pro gun but is knowledgeable about firearms? That's some unicorn stuff right there
Mishro22 I think this is more to capture the beliefs of a average civilian. To see what they know, and think.
OMG did she really just say that there aren't background checks at gunshows!? I'm going to the wrong gunshows then. EVERY gunshow I have been to does a background check.
Todd Jackson bUt tHe lOopHoLe?
Same here
yep. gotta love southern Californians talking about guns like they know which side the bullet comes out of....
She's obviously never been to a gunshow. Really sad and uneducated on firearms.
@@kyleellis7130 there literally arent federally lmao post your source. the producers said they were focusing on federal laws.
Perhaps a more balanced, educated group would have shown both sides better. put a little more effort in getting a proper conversation.
make this top comment
Exactly this... there was one guy who was allegedly pro 2nd amendment, but even then, he really wasn't.
@@christianhardin123 Agreed
coffee637 the world would be so much friendlier if god mad all mens penises the same size.
They don’t want to do that. In 99% of their videos all reactors are liberal. It’s california though
16:33 Maybe you shouldn't have cops who have domestic violence in their background.
Finally something I can agree on.
Yep
Truly, I understand this sentiment, and I agree. But police forces are some of the most understaffed jobs in America, because the only people that want to do it are those genuinely interested in protecting people, and those that want the power. Guess which of those groups tend to continue on their career path when they encounter the other group.
Exactly.
Domestic violence is a felony, you can't become a police officer with a felony.
FBE: Please be constructive
Commentors: "First"
Ikr 😁😁😁
So early the the comments haven’t gone toxic yet
Your Friendly Neighborhood Smark lmao right
200th like 😎
Im not high
There are NO drugs
Hey hey people Sseth here
This hurt my brain to watch. You need to get someone from outside of California to comment. Btw I'm from Canada. You used our law as an example.
1. They aren't gonna bring in people from outside the state... that would take a lot more effort, money, and time than just using someone in California.
2. Yeah, they viewed laws from other countries to see the US equivalent. That was kinda the point of the video.
Na yalls are very weird
i find it funny that they preface the video by saying “we include multiple perspectives” and then have one gun owner and even he disagrees with america’s gun control as it is now
Maybe that's because agreeing with a situation where you live in a country where there are pretty much daily mass shootings, is a position that is so ridiculous and fringe it is very hard to find someone who had that position?
@@AhsimNreiziev maybe the fact that mass shootings aren't happening the way people think is a big part. The US defines mass shootings differently than any other country because there is no one definition. The numbers are being swelled by false data points that nobody would consider a mass shooting. That's not too mention the fact that most gun violence is gang based.
+[Alistair Grey]
In the United States, a mass-shooting is defined as a gun-related crime where at least 4 people die due to gun shots.
Having 4 or more people *die* due to a single act of gun violence, every day, year after year, and be of the opinion that this is an acceptable situation, is an extremely fringe position no matter which way you slice it.
You should also look up the recent clip of Andrew Yang speaking to a mother of a child killed by a gun. As Yang says in the clip, a situation like that mother describes should not be able to exist. Not anywhere in the world, but especially not in the United States of America.
Maybe you should apply for the next video and openly show your face and talk about it.
@@alistairgrey5089 substituting a problem for a problem still leaves a problem. Fact of the matter is that America has the highest rate of gun violence in the world, and unless that changes this issue still requires a solution.
I love that they keep using the term “military” but none of the guns mentioned are used in the military
Love that that's the part u focus on as if that dismisses any of the points
@@Misosoup99 It does, because it underscores the fact that these people have no knowledge and thus no right to be talking about firearms. Should I go ask bus drivers about how to fly an airplan? No. Why not? Because they are completely unqualified to speak on the subject as are most of the politician that try to ban weapons. They know nothing about them yet they are "all bad", and from your comment you have no authority to speak on it either.
@@Misosoup99 Dude, I'm from California and these people personify ignorance of the laws. Very few have an actual idea how the laws are actually written and employed, plus their use to getting screwed by the Californian government.
Whether or or not the military uses the guns or not doesn’t really matter. I think it’s more of how deadly could the gun be. Ya know if we’re talking big double digit number in casualties in like two or three minutes that might be a problem.
Bhushan I think you just made my IQ drop pretty significantly
Seeing the South African law is interesting. Cape Town, South Africa has been declared a war zone because of the number of gang related shootings and killings but I guess Cape Town has a GANG problem and not necessarily a GUN problem.
isn't it funny how the laws do nothing though?
@@ElectronicsForFun corruption is very funny indeed :/
@@eksieperfeksie3680 what does corruption have to do with people not following the laws?
same with chicago detroit st Louis not a gun problem
Yeah. Even though the most dangerous cities are in America. There are also some bad cities in other parts of the world.
It's incredible how the nit pick to make guns look bad and pick people that don't know anything about owing or buying guns
I know right
Pert of the problem with restricting gun purchases based off of mental health is that we're basically running parallel to the actual problem. We as a country, and seemingly as a planet, lack a robust and comprehensive system for addressing mental health all across society. Fixing that would go much further toward preventing mass shootings, and not fixing it leaves us ill-equipped to decide what mental state is and isn't grounds for restricting access to guns. It's almost as if we're treating the symptom and not the problem. _Hmmmmmm._
Landon Hagan.
Very true.
So much for the fallicy of all that HIAP (Health In All Policies) requirements under the UN, and that we all signed onto after the Ottawa charter.
The ones that make all countries responsible for human rights abuses, fair treatments & just laws..and that all policies & laws be made with health, (all kinds, mental, physical, spiritual) and established best practices in relevant fields, being formost requirements in their passing, or continuing to exist as legitimate laws to govern people.
Most countries in the world are signatories to it now, and not just the biggest, or 1st world ones either.
And when i was studying my Enrolled Nursing course, i became aware of just how much both is, in some areas & regards..but also NOT in others, being enforced, or even taken seriously.
Came across more than a few double standards of the kinds you've touched on here myself, and often wondered (Especially as a pro-gun owner in Australia!) About many of those issues myself.
Asked lots of questions too..never been given anything even remotely like a legitimate answer yet..
The closest if been given to an honest answer so far, is that its far too big & widespread a problem for 'only laws & policies' to fully change, even over time..
But mostly it comes down to 'political viability' issues, and that the 'current problems' re: mental health standards, are not issues anyone wants to tackle, or fund..
Or be left holding the bag for, or their name left attached to its potential failures.
"It's not quite bad enough, or broken enough, for us to need to mess with 'fixing' it yet.."
The many who fall through the cracks are considered "accidental collateral damage" of the system, and not for any one person/title/politician to be accountable for..
Hell, we cant even fix serious problems of 'ambulance ramping' en mass, (lined up, waiting their turn, on the emergency IN ramp) at our capital city hospital, on any given day..
Much less the myriad of mere 'mental health issues', which are a much less concerning area (politically) for the masses here.
Until it gets used as a catch all excuse to legally steal our rights & private property, falsely and without any proof or due process, because the system isn't even coping for the actual people with known, medically established mental health issues, much less any real (or even demonstrated) ability to provide real due process of law & accusations against gun owners.
There is no real protections for gun rights here at any level, now.
It is intentionally being stripped away, and used AGAINST you now, despite descrimination supposedly being illegal.
I can't descriminate: but everyone else can about my private property & how i use it..we already have far too many intrusive laws for that!
And I've had a gut full of it.
So much for bwing "free people" in a free & domocratic country..its hard enough to be treated like a "real person" anymore..much less respect us as a 'gun' owner.
As if ownership of privately owned property (of any kind), is something we have to ask the permission of strangers for..in any capacity..much less our very private homes!
Ever wondered how horrified most hoplophobes would be, if they really knew just how many of the poeple they rely on every day..are shooters & gun owners?
From the wardsman taking you down to X-ray, to the surgeon doing live-saving NICU work on their premature baby, to the taxi driver taking you home..to your child's ballet or gymnastics instructor..to the builders & electricians that build, plan, create and power your elitest little worlds, to the saw millers that made your beautiful wood homes & furnishings..
What if we all, one day soon decide to draw a line of our own?
And refuse you, to dictate what rights, freedoms and even private property or classes you can attend in our own country instead..
What if we decided that you cannot own your semi-automatic transmission motor vehicles anymore, either..hmm?
Learn to drive a real car, in full, to a high standard of competency..
What if that firefighter decided he won't help save tyrants & those who willfully aid them, vote for them..to steal from us, to interfere like slithering asps, even in our private lives & homes, and our private property..
Who vote against freedoms of arms.
You go to any other country on earth, where that is the established rule of the land, and i guarantee..you won't wanna live there yourself.
I am convinced these people know nothing about US gun laws.
"The government isnt gonna come knocking on our doors and take our guns thats not how that works." Uhhh look at Venezuela.
oh shit whatup didnt realize they were talking about south america my oops
Since when is Venezuela part of the United States? Might as well say "Look at Australia" but that won't help your case.
@@DanielOrteez Your response is very short-sighted. Have you watched the news lately? Venezuelans gave up their guns to the government and they are now being slaughtered and starved because they want the current regime to give up their power.
@Vorzie yes, the first amendment is to advocate for our freedoms, the 2nd amendment to protect the first. When we lose our guns, we lose our freedom.
Annnd Germany, aannnnd China, aaaaannd Soviet Union, aaannnnd Turkey, aaannnd Guatemala, aaaanddd Cambodia, aaannnndd Uganda......
_"The government doesn't want to come take your guns."_
*Robert Francis O'Rourke:* _(Hold my skateboard)_
I really wholeheartedly agree with Sharon about “Let’s pour some money onto mental health if you’re going to blame it!”
And video games dangerous things. Dinosaurs were nuts. As well.
Almost 80% of all mass shooters were mentally ill no link there! it's just a scapegoat
i wish we would focus as a species on individuals mental health as well as their physical health, since we are probably the only species where are mental health can matter more because of our higher thought processes
@@boogie1434 and 100% had guns, yet there is definitely no link there.
Damon Gill and 100% of shark attacks involve sharks sherlock
They’re blaming video games again... games don’t have anything to do with it. It’s just easier to blame games than to actually deal with the issue. You can’t just ban guns because that’s not how it works. They should actually you know do better at background checks and make it so you can’t just easily have access. A lot of the people who do bad things like this have mental health issues and they shouldn’t be aloud to have access to that, and for they’re comment on there’s no background checks at gun shows that’s not true there are I’ve worked some and witnessed background checks happening at gun shows when I go to help run the books with my dad. It takes 15-30 minutes if everything goes well sometimes it takes 30-40 it depends honestly.. it all comes down to education and training.
That Thespian Person 97 Remember, wars didn’t exist before video games.
Matthew Brown except they did. Look in your history books. But the media is placing the blame on gaming which is unfortunate. Every time there’s a shooting or any threat someone somewhere in the media tries to make that the excuse.
That Thespian Person 97 *bruh moment*
Matthew Brown lies chess and quantum chess where the biggest games and caused wars all over the globe
@@thatthespianperson9733 you know matthew is being sarcastic, right?
These perspectives aren’t diverse at all
So you're saying every one of them wants to ban all guns?
Raja1938 I’m saying nobody is defending the reason we have or don’t have these laws. Technically there ideas are different but they’re all from the left side.
@@user-lc4iy4wj6w I distinctly heard at least two of the guys explain why the 2nd Amendment was necessary.
@@Raja1938 people on the left still defend the 2nd amendment, to a certain extent, but i want to see people on their defend the 2nd amendment, ar15s, and ak47s. You know the whoe shabang
@@user-lc4iy4wj6w Lol. Do it here. Defend them. Tell me why you, and every citizen of the US or whatever other country, should have access to automatic, military grade weaponry?
I’m all for common sense gun legislation but you guys should have found at least one person who is really pro 2nd amendment to offer a more balanced perspective.
^
Seriously
@@holstfly1yes
I’m pro 2nd amendment and young but I know a lot and agree with you it just has to be agreed on and people that know what they are talking about need to do it not people that make up facts
Jesse Rodriguez, what "common sense" legislation would you propose?
3:55 that’s wrong. That is not factual. You cannot buy a firearm in Nevada and go back to California. California is one of the only states where you can’t do that. They will literally tell you wherever you’re buying the firearm that you cannot transport it to California. You can’t even buy it if you’re a resident of California!! And also what they fail to mention is that Australia has banned guns that’s why this law is so strict. It’s like transporting drugs in a sense.
1 state out of 50, nice.
Simi not necessarily. It depends on the gun. The style. The magazine. The bullet button. The stock. There’s a lot of things that can deny your purchase. If you attempt to buy an AR that has a bump stock attachment in Texas and you live in Nevada your purchase will be denied because of the recent ban of them due to the Las Vegas shooting. Many states also have the bullet button law that don’t let you eject the magazine from the gun. You can’t buy assault rifles out of state if u live in New York. Like I said there’s many factors that can contribute to you being able to purchase a firearm. The attachments can cause ur purchase to be denied because in your resident state it’s illegal. Same as the style of firearm shotgun, pistol, etc. In essence to address your statement, no not only one state. Each state has different laws which effect the legality of purchases in other states.
Simi she’s still wrong
Simi also the point of America is we kick as together, but like DC need to just leave idc about trump and Hilary just don’t start wars are let us handle day to day, STATES
They were talking about federal laws. Not state
For the Australian Law I think a lot of people don't know that Life Imprisonment is only 25 years in AUS
Sophie Foreman and in Norway it’s only 21
@@Carolineintoodeep1288 Yeh see a lot of people just assume that life is life and say its too harsh but they dont know that life is different in each country
Same in Germany, life imprisonment is only about 25 years
in Sweden it’s 16 years
Still a fair law though. In fact, it NOT being life makes it better
I think people in comments should simply recognize that people can have opinions. It's fine. It's OK to have opinions.
Yeah but there's a difference between your own opinion and "believing in someone elses opinion". Seen so many people who don't actually have opinions who just follow others because they don't care or want learn orbmake one themselves
This is the internet on a website where you're semi-anonymous. Lots of people love to argue when there's no face to attach the opinion to.
@@RelaxRelapse720 There's also a lot of astroturfing/brigading with these kinds of videos.
Anyone with a gun do a 24hr video without a gun. This will be shocking content 🙀
Please give a like for all to see. Spread this message also.
It's a cute thought.. but only until different opinions begin affecting people in the real world. Nobody is entitled to an opinion just for the sake of it. They should only be entitled to an *informed* opinion.
This is clearly a major problem in the world, and it shouldn't be brushed aside by these kinds of comments.
there was no discussion here... there was no one ith a different opinion who knew what they were talking about with guns. this is such a waste of time.
I mean.... read the title
Dear FBE,
To prevent group think, try to pair reactors with similar personalities or age bracket. Sometimes it's obvious a reactor is a little less opinionated because the other is either seen as older/wiser or dominating the conversion
also get people with different views and different social backgrounds
Guns are very strictly regulated in Sweden. Swedes must get an individual license for every firearm. Prospective gun owners submit the application directly to the police. To obtain the license, you have to show that you have a specific need for a firearm, like hunting, sport shooting, or collecting guns. A license may be granted for protection, but in practice, these types of licenses are almost never granted. You also have to pass an exam or have been a member of a shooting club for at least six months. Weapons and ammunition must be stored in approved gun safes. There are significant penalties for breaking these rules.
Sweden, the country with 10 million people and twice the rapes per million than the USA. Slow clap.
I think you are missing the point, say all those laws be put in the place in the USA, not saying that some of them shouldn't, what would happen. I mean its not as if 300 plus million guns in the USA that are known would possibly be easily acquired illegally.
Some of your laws, I agree with. Passing an exam 100%. Individual license, ey don't see how it would do much. Storing something that you want for quick protection in a safe, eyy. Having the government choose if YOuR REASON for wanting a firearm is good enough, fuck off.
Good on Sweden!!!
Yeah. that's stupid, no offense.
I shouldn't have to prove to the police that I "need" protection, especially when I live miles away from the Sheriff's Dept and it would take an hour for an adequate response to arrive.
"You need a reason" no thanks.
@Dr. Dirty Hands And were did you read that? I live in Sweden and never heard of this.
@@lgmmrm And what do you need to protect from? Here in Sweden there is no guns and mass shooting, you don't need a gun.
When the constitution was written people had cannons legally and automatic weapons legally
The technology for firearms was advancing, especially when it was needed to fight the British twice.
Leonard Chornomaz i know. That’s what I’m saying. One of the idiots in the video pulled the old “the constitution wasn’t written for modern weapons” argument. But it was written for anyone to have any weapon imaginable. Including assault rifles, nukes, etc. But of course i don’t think people should be able to own nukes and shit like that. But I’m just saying technically any restrictions on weapons are unconstitutional
Yes because the 2nd say Armaments.
Woman also couldn't Vote. Your point is?
A tyrannical government is possible. Who is the freest country in the world? America, why? Because ppl with guns keep the government in check, not the other way around.
I feel that not mentioning that many state laws make getting guns far more difficult than the base federal laws and asking questions designed to instigate a certain response is a very unfair way to show this discussion. Being ambiguous with your stance when it clearly is in favor of more gun laws is dishonest as well.
FBE should do a Change My Mind collab with Steven Crowder.
Lmao, they know better then that.
They know they'd get destroyed.
@@TheZaros666 tbf it's 'change my mind' not a debate. Hopefully their minds will be changed
@@TheZaros666 It actually is that Crowder never does one of those in an uncontrolled environment, he does go to liberal colleges but he i surrounded by the conservative-leaning students that forms a mob-like mentality and he has policemen around. Think why he never does actual debates in person (when both sides are actually prepared and not on the fly) and in the few time when his strategy doesn't work, you can see that he doesn't know how to debate on equal footing and relies on insulting his opponent so the conservative students around him go "oooohhh" and cut the debate early so he can just get to a student that is not prepared and rinse and repeat
TH-cam will derank the fuck out of them.
And lose because every one of their points were feels over reals when crowder has facts to prove all this wrong
My teacher was explaining where to go during a fire and during a tornado at the beginning of the school year, and a student asked where we would go if there was a lockdown and the teacher said that she won’t tell us until it happens because one of us could be the reason we‘re in a lockdown.
Kate Murray very smart.
No that’s not smart
Cuz when your in a foreal moment of panic all logic goes out the door
beginning of the school year we practiced duck and cover for civil defense. The overpressure blast number where the windows blow out is something like 1/2 Lb per square inch.
@@TreeGod. that's why you should never panic.
Although this is a great example of how the populace is informed it also shows that we clearly need better, more informed education. If we properly educated the populace, this conversation would actually mean something.
Yeah dude for real
👏👏👏👏
Whenever FBE says they're trying to have a 'diverse' set of opinions, they always disappoint. It's always just 1 person when they have so much more in their cast.
And even that person agrees with them.
Even the producer asking the questions sounds like she's being tortured to ask them, sounds like she doesn't want to be there at all
Start teaching hunters safety in schools again.
Holla back!
Right! But that would make to much sense, you mean to say that you must be educated on a subject to pass effective legislation. Not to mention the drop in injury and death rates by accidental discharges.
@@i-like-planes1215 do u really think they would have the gun loaded
And bring trap club back hell my senior year I and about 40 other students to a shotgun to school and most of us decided just left it and the ammo in our trucks instead of putting it in the safe provided for trap club cause trap was after school never had a school shooting or even accidental shooting
Harder to indoctrinate people into gun control if they are educated.
Plus firearms education inherently exposed people to guns earlier and gun control proponents hope to sway you to their side before you ever have any real life experience with guns.
In Hawaii, we are required to take a gun safety class before getting a permit to purchase a handgun. In class we learn to shoot with different types of guns because we don’t know what type fits for each person. After we get the permit from the gun store we have to bring that permit with the type of gun that you want to buy to the police station to get approved. After getting approved, we bring the permit back and get the gun, then bring it back to the police station to register it. So that’s basically what the process is here
ill move there and gladly take the class. idk if its more homework, but like driver's ed. it'll be worth the extra work.
Shocking since Hawaii was literally colonized by America and is one of few states where you can't, in practice as shown by numbers OG approved licenses, get a carry permit.
In California
you need to learn Rocket science to understand Gun Control
You really should do more research...or Any research.
1. It is against federal law to buy a gun in a state you don’t live in. If you want to buy a gun from another state, it has to be transferred to a dealer in your state, and you have to go through a background check.
Additionally, it’s against the law to do a personal sale across state lines.
2. Background checks are required to buy a gun from ANY dealer. Also there are background checks at gun shows. They include mental health and police records.
Most of these people get their information from the news which isn't surprising
stef 96 where do I get my news then
Thank you! I'm only half-way through the vid and already so disappointed FBE... been a long time fan (even of the few-and-far between serious vids like this), but you're quoting a bs news outlet like Vox instead of pulling data from primary sources? Shame.
@@joey935 I read articles and the laws that's how because I noticed how bad the news was getting and they get away with it spreading lies
@@joey935 I accidentally put a "how" lol ignore that
Hearing these people talk about their Guns knowledge is just laughable
It honestly is, it’s all ignorance
I'm a literal child and I know more than them
@@Anarcho_Insurrection same here
@@Anarcho_Insurrection I’m like 16 California and I prolly know more about guns than they do lmfao
@@type2depression455 The person who claims to know a lot, knows little. Dunning-Kruger effect
Gosh... I didn't think anyone would bring up Christina Grimmie. Its been so long and I'm glad she'll be remember forever.
My family owns a wide range of guns and on our last vacation everyone shot every gun that they where physically capable of, that included kids from ages 5 to 13. Half of them are in safety classes and all of them showed the right responsibilities needed when being around the guns and handling them. Knowledge is power. I’m not afraid of guns, I’m afraid of the uneducated and the criminals behind the gun
I don't agree with kids shooting though.
@@johnnymarinara3797 Because you are an idiot. Safety begins early. Just like teaching your kid that the stove is hot. You do it early so they DON'T hurt themselves or someone else. Most child related gun shots are usually because of curiosity and a lack of knowledge. If there is a gun in the house and you have a child, they better damn well know everything that can happen with it and what can happen if they touch it. Also I leaned to shoot rifles and shotguns in the Boy Scouts before I was 12. So get out of here with you paranoid BS.
would you still be as afraid of those uneducated people if they didn't have a gun, though?
Johnny Marinara that is perfectly fine for you and I 100% support in ur belief just as long as u don’t push that on me
Seb J. Whoever what are the odds that at some point in their life they will see a gun?
Man I shouldn’t have watched this. It just frustrated me
Same here, no one knows anything about guns
@@ThisisKyle The stupidity of all these people just pissed me off.
@@Tellnor It makes me sad lol
@@Tellnor May I ask in what way
@@ThisisKyle May I ask why
Mental health is often used as a scapegoat when it comes to this issue. But in reality, people with mental health issues are more likely to be victims of violent crime rather than the perpetrators. And only 4% of recent shooters have been shown to have signs of mental health issues. The problem is most to do with socio-economic issues.
It takes someone really messed up in the head to go out and shoot a bunch of people. That’s not just some angry dude. That’s someone who is mentally ill and quite possibly deranged.
And the notoriety they get from the media that makes their name known and heard.
"There is a difference between our guns now and muskets from the 1700's." Oh you pushed the Young Turks button, you shouldn'ta did that.
Founding fathers let people have cannons that could take down a ship. They knew there guns at the time and let people have them, so as long as they were trained and proper with a weapon. By the same left logic, we can have free speech so as long as it pertains to ink and paper.
Cenks greasy face deflects arguments.
Why? How is that argument flawed?
@@nunchucktaylor3488 because in the 1700's private citizens had cannons and entire warships with cannons. Do you wanna know what will cause more damage; an AR-15 or a warship/cannon?
BadKitty NoTuna An AR. Because cannons are incredibly hard to mobilize especially with only one person (I’d say impossible actually) and much like muskets you have minimum 10 seconds between shots (original muskets took over a minute to reload and at their height it was 3 shots a minute) as opposed to milliseconds. And I’m gonna go ahead and say that exactly zero boats or warships were ever used to mow down people at school or in a church or at a concert. I’m confused, were you being sarcastic or are you so stupid that you actually think that’s a logical comparison?
Assault is a verb, AR15 stands for Armalite Rifle model 15. People say assault rifle because it sounds menacing. Anything can be an assault weapon if used to assault someone. If I throw a paper ball at you, it’s assault paper. If I hit you with a golf club it’s an assault club. And so on.
AGREED. THANK GOD SOMEONE SMART
@@sotohc96 the internet was created for military use too but here we are using it like crazy
@@sotohc96 yes the ar15 was created for the military but you know what they also make ar15 for civilian s so that literally doesn't make any sense.
Not to mention the first semi auto rifle was not built for.the military it for civilians before the military picked them up
First off, these "weapons of war" (lol), are semi-automatic (one trigger pull = one bullet) same as virtually every single other gun manufactured this day and age. Secondly, if someone is threatening my life, I want the fight to be as lopsided as possible in my favor.
@@sotohc96 And if you remove guns nothing changes. look at the UK they're knife attacks now and acid attacks.
not to mention mass shooter haven't dropped at all even after the assault weapon ban from the government.
In fact most people who own guns are not going to go out and shoot other people. In fact a large majority of us like to shoot guns and use it to defend our families. Cause sometimes the police take too long and or have short resources.
Take a look at the LA-riots korean shop owners were getting unjustified hate and started to loot and the police couldn't do anything and the koreans used their 2nd amendment rights and saved themselves.
not to mention removing guns from the USA also weakens us, it's kinda funny how in our history not one fucking country has decided to invade us at all, because all of our citizens have guns and armed. not to mention if the government does get corrupted we have a fighting chance at rebuilding.
look at north korea, the people there CANNOT fight back against the corrupt government they have no weapons or anything for that matter to take back and lead a new government.
I just read through some comments and I think it’s scary that nobody brought up that fact that they agreed that if you are “accused” of domestic violence you should not be able to get a gun. Accused, not convicted.
Xutos wow I didn’t even pay attention I was looking at the comment section 😄
That should happen! THAT NEEDS TO HAPPEN!
WE CAN SAVE MORE LIVES HERE!
@@rubyyates4778 bad joke
Also if you were committed to a physc ward for suicidal depression many years ago you can get one either
You do not need a licence to operate a vehicle on private property or purchase a vehicle
So I don't need a driver's license to purchase a vehicle from a dealership?
@@chrisferrell1037 no, to test drive it you do but if you have someone deliver it to your private property you're good
@@johnschwalb I never knew that
@@chrisferrell1037 no
Just something to think about Walmart said they are going to take “violent “ video games off the shelf which have been proven to have little to no correlation to violence but in some locations they still sell guns
That weird Artist Video games aren’t a constitutional right and Walmart doesn’t sell modern sporting weapons...they sell the type of gun everybody is supposedly in favor of keeping like granddaddy’s shotgun or rifle.
If nobody had a gun then you wouldn't need one to protect yourself and no regular civilian needs deadly guns whatever about a small one in case of robbery etc and here in Ireland you have to apply for a gun license and get it renewed regularly
when the second amendment was written 1. we didn't have automatic weapons 2. they were a rebellion that had just rebeled against your parent country and were basically at war with a bunch of people for good sack threbis a famous painting of someone on a horse riding through villages yelling that the British are coming like for good sake WE ARENT AT WAR WITH ANYONE IN YOUR DAMN COUNTRY
We can't just get rid of guns.
Sadly it is not as simple as "nobody has a gun" because you can take guns away from law abiding citizens however it is very easy for a determined criminal to purchase a gun ILLEGALLY with gun trafficking and smuggling. You would be effectively ensuring nobody good has a gun but bad people do. It is similar to marijuana in a sales sense. When its legal good people can purchase it and own it but when it was illegal it was very common among bad people as it became lucrative to sell it illegally. By banning guns you create a market for illegal guns that only bad people buy.
@@quintonb9626 When the 1st amendment was written: we didn't have the internet.
Guess we need to get rid of the 1st
You cannot stop people from getting a gun from the black market
I wish you would have put out a casting call for Republicans to come in a react/give their opinion. It would be nice to see a cast more diverse in thought.
i agree. BUT THEN THE REPUBLICANS CAN LEArN!!!!!!
tennis freak Exactly it will give a chance for everyone to learn and here others perspective.
@@martialartsnerd7673 yup!
Its California: Conservatives aren't usually out in the open.
That would disrupt their virtue signaling echo chamber.
This is actually really scary how they are cherry-picking topics and succeeding
It’s more scary that they misrepresent laws such as the laws for buying guns over state lines.
I think they should all go thru the process of getting a firearm even if they don’t get it just go thru the process so they know what actually happens
Yes
Yes
They literally COULD have done this for this video yet they chose not to do so.
@@Froward_Thinker because they don't want non gun owners to know the truth so they can use the fear to shape the narrative.
Anyone with a gun do a 24hr video without a gun. This will be shocking content 🙀
Please give a like for all to see. Spread this message also.
The 2nd Amendment is not meant to be a privilege given to the people by the government, it is a right of the PEOPLE which restricts the power of the government against the people.
Which pretty much makes it absolutely outdated and pointless. This was meant for an early America, and people cling to this because they have no other defense for as why they should be able to own a gun. The 2nd Amendment NEVER gave the power for citizens to simply own a gun, it gave them a right to own a gun to defend against the Government, which isn't even a threat these days. The 2nd Amendment is why were are in this hellhole in the first place.
The Second Amendment allows for a "well regulated" militia. Gun control is not inherently unconstitutional; in fact, under Article 1 Section 8, you can find the words "the Congress shall have the Power . . . To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia." The Elastic Clause establishes that Congress has the ability to create laws and enforce this power. Therefore, the constitution does not prevent gun control and regulation, but instead encourages it.
I want a fully armed tank. I should be able to protect myself with equal firepower to what the government has.
@@adamn7516 Yes, yes you can. Here's how to get one.
www.pewpewtactical.com/how-to-buy-tank/
Another link or 2 for you
www.dailydot.com/unclick/operational-tank-for-sale-armslist/
www.drivetanks.com/own-one/
@@adamn7516 I want a fighter jet as well just in case
A gun is a tool and always has been a tool, the idea of limiting the firearm is absurd to me but the limiting the person is a wonderful idea. I don’t think that going after the guns is the way to go in the slightest. I understand both sides but stripping the people of their firearms will not work it might start a civil war. I do believe that more in depth mental screening would help limit some of the guns falling into the wrong hands. Now that being said ninety percent of the firearms that are in the civilian market aren’t up to military standard and full autos are incredibly hard to get and further more I don’t think most people understand the capabilities of the military.
I was in school not far away from the STEM school in Colorado during the shooting. You can’t describe the feeling not even being there but knowing that people, kids, trying to go to school and get an education going to school not knowing that it will be the scariest day of your life feels like. It’s just so frustrating.
You know what a lot people said after that ..... "Arm the teachers".So the solution to fix problems with guns is more guns. I feel your frustration
Sharon seems to have the most common sense of them all. She knows the arguments and counterarguments. She knows what's realistically possible and what is best for everyone. She acknowledges what people's rights are, but wants it to be orderly. Not sure why more people can't be like that.
There is something we need to see, and that is how we tend to simplify things. Media plays a huge role in here, since people normally wont do research on their own. So, if you have easily accessible platforms(media) blastinh the negative side of gun use, the result is quite obvious.
@aaron guest You don't need to know anything about guns to know what laws will work to protect citizens, what laws won't, and what is deemed unconstitutional.
The amount of ignorance (including mine) dealing with this topic alone shows that there is a real problem here and we aren’t doing our best to fix it.
*our
McGriddles my bad 😅
Most people just believe what they hear or told with no fact checking. Media regularly spreads false information then later puts out a correction, no one hears about. This whole first to put information out before knowing the actual information is a problem.
Please share your infinite knowledge on guns and this topic I'm so eager to hear
Kolby Rau what would you like to know? Because I refuse to list the hundreds of gun laws or how every gun works and functions.
A few hours ago some guy in the UK went around stabbing people on the streets and had to be stopped by chairs and tables...
And you can go to the store and buy knives and axes without being 18 even tho they are dangerous
@@markhenry3011 next up: knife recall and knife license
Got to add chairs and tables to the bill as well.
Okay that’s better than the amount of gun deaths🤣States with non strict gun control laws have 3 times as many deaths than states with strict gun control laws. You people are blind even with statistics
Anything over a 2in blade is an assualt knife remember that and dont get me started on box cutters or razors to shave with...
This is disappointing. Not the laws, but the REACT channel is disappointing. Of course there arent going to be gun laws at the federal level because that is something that is done per state. Reminder: we are a union, not one giant state. Not mentioning the comparable state laws is lazy at best and manipulating at worst. I'll retitle the video: "Do you know about gun laws in America? because we dont, and you still wont by the end of this video."
Interesting how all the comments saying "terrible video" are from people fairly informed on the subject and all the people saying "great video" are clueless about the subject.
Because its easier to believe in something than it is to fact check information.
Society in a nutshell am I right?
Caddy Guy I’ve seen a lot of your replies, and I just want to say, if you ever become a politician, you have my vote. You watch Crowder or Shapiro?
Have you ever thought of something called "different opinion"? You can be educated just as much, but if you value different stuff, your opinion will differ. But yeah, let's call everyone with different opinion than mine "uninformed".
False Name there’s a line between being educated with different views and perspectives and then there are these guys who are not educated on the subject matter making these view points based on biased falsified informations.
Kind of wished if you showed more how European and Asian nations deal their gun control.
Singapore: look up "Scheduled Weapons Act". The only people who have firearms here are law enforcement and the Military.(accurately: *Arms and Explosives act* )
I mean, sure, we've had a case of a gilded boyfriend smuggling his SAR-21 rifle out of camp, but that happened back in 2007, and the armed forces(and in turn, even the police) has since stepped up on security protocols.
Many Europian countries dont have laws that allow people to buy guns. This way the only people allowed to have them are the police and the millitary. We put trust in them to make sure people dont illigally own guns.
In the Netherlands we have an indirect democracy. Parties need 2/3 of all votes to be able to change the "ground laws" (freedom of speech, discrimination is illigal ect. and the whole political system, there is also a counsil that makes sure the new laws dont interfere with existing ones. ) Our military is also very small and gets supervised/controlled by the politics. It would be very hard for a tirrany to start within the netherlands. The number of murders is very low in the Netherlands and I feel very safe here.
It depends from country to country. In places like the UK, you cannot own any firearm at all. You can't even take pocket knives with you.
In my country, you can own a 6.35 or .32 S&W, but first you need to do psychological tests and train with said guns. They're branded as "personal defense" guns. You can also own rifles but they're meant for hunting.
@@dalejanse8577 In Finland many people have hunting rifles/shotguns, but they need a licence to hunt AND a licence for the gun, which is renewed annually. No handguns or anything more powerful than that. We have hardly any gun violence, and not even all of our cops carry guns.
@@ivylasangrienta6093 Well your living in a much different country with a smaller and less diverse population.
In the Netherlands we have a 6 month period of evaluation so you are you are aware what a gun can do. I want to learn how to shoot but the hoops have stopped me from actively precuing it. I would learn to shoot for sport. Not for protection.
Why has it stopped you?
nielswitberg shame! You should always know how to protect yourself first.
Alternate title: “California neoliberals who know nothing about guns discuss how bad and icky guns are with Vox as their main source”
Clown by
Clown boy
I can’t believe the green hair girl said she thinks mass shooters aren’t mentally ill. Shows u just how stupid the ppl in this video really are, n if u can’t see it ur stupid
Damn so you just bypassed the whole topic that they talked about guns are not restricted enough which causes school shootings but sure
People who think video games is the reason gun attacks happen, please, take a sleep and relax your brain.
even dr phil agrees that video games are not the reason, and that should say something to everyone who DOES think they are.
Horror movies exist since idk when, does this means that actors in horror movies or even better producers have a chance to be killers? Please.
2A is not about self defense or hunting. The 2A is there to protect the citizens of the United States from the government. I would really suggest that the staff/reactors of FBE read the Federalist Papers.
What I prefer is a licensing gun law in United States like what Switzerland and the Czech Republic have, basically have requirements like going through a gun safety training course, a mental evaluation test, a literacy test and a strong background check, there would be a few different types of gun licenses from a basic gun license in which a person can own a pistol and a low powered shotgun to a advanced gun license in which a person can own a assault rifle / machine gun and be able to be allowed to open carry ( FYI the people that were most likely getting a advanced gun license are anyone that's a member of the military, law enforcement, and security ), also anyone who already owns a gun or more with not committing any type of crime would be grandfathered a gun license.
Don't complicate what is simple:
The 2A was writen in 1791, when people still had powder-bang-sticks for guns. It's the 21st century now. Time's have changed and now people in your country are finally catching up with the rest of the world. The problem's clearly much larger than it once could have ever been, and rules need to be changed. People are basing their facts on something, so there must be a problem, right?
@@fluffysnatch4689 The particular gun law I'm naming is what Switzerland and Czech Republic has in which those countries are nowhere close to being in tyranny with also low homicide rates and low crime rates, you act like I want to ban guns in general when in reality my comment made it obvious that I don't.
This comment section is going to be hell
Unfortunate facts!
Because as video shows emotions override logic and facts.
@@Magnum_Express exactly why they want to ban guns
Already is. Chock full of the usual "See no evil, hear no evil" talk.
It is, but I'm doing the best I can to defend the truth
1:58 “according to Vox”
Yep that ruined the whole aargument
And BBC
1:24 people use AR 15s to hunt destructive animals like Hogs. And they make semi auto AK 47s. So sorry to say but I disagree with your statement bud.
Im sorry but I don't know what in your mind makes you think and needing a militarized weapon for "destructive" animals is okay Let alone the idea of using a gun on a "destructive" animal. if there was a "destructive" animal and it needed to be handled, there are plenty of other ways to handle it without using a militarized weapon.
Sea King that's true but you can also just use a regular Bolt action rifle to kill a Hog. I use a .243 bolt action to hunt hogs and other animals
Most hunting grounds make it so you can't use 223 LR(one ar15 ammo)
James Anderson The AR15 is not militarized, it actually was denied by the military because it didn’t pack enough punch.
@@JamesAnderson-rx6hz How is a gun made for civilians is considered a military weapon?
Glad I got here before the comments are disabled.
I really miss Christina Grimmie, she was an angel on earth. Tragic loss that I still can't get over. However, during this episode I noticed that nobody was talking about defensive gun use or stating any statistics about it which is very important when talking about guns
Gotcha brother, with extra sauce:
Firearms are used more often defending lives than used to take lives by criminals. Defensive gun use estimates of annual uses ranging from about 500,000 to more than 3 million. Simply, guns save lives, not take.
CDC for reference:
www.nap.edu/read/18319/chapter/3
As for "assault weapons" and banning them, the FBI did a study of the 90's Assault Weapons ban. They found it did nothing to prevent their criminal use, in fact they found handguns where used in the overwhelming majority of crimes with firearms while assault weapons where insignificant in use by comparison.
FBI study for reference:
dev.journalistsresource.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/UPennAssaultBan.pdf
you use vox for your stats... already wrote this off
We not gonna take away your rights but we want to make you earn the right? Then it's no longer a right.
No one has the right to own or drive a car. But you have the right as a US citizen to keep and bare arms.
Maybe a law that was written 200 years ago should change with the times then
@@CrimXenZero they have. Alot.
Significantly the laws on guns have changed in the last 200 years
@@scottyboy9883 but not the Amendment, which in my opinion should change slightly as well.
Are you saying that owning a gun is a right but not a car??
Oh God this comment section is about to be MESSY.
Already is. Chock full of the usual "See no evil, hear no evil" talk.
They literally got the first law wrong. You have to be a resident of the state to buy a gun. If you want to buy a gun out of state you have to get a certified seller to transfer the gun to another certified seller in your state. You can’t just buy a gun out of state like they are fireworks
I was about to say they got it wrong lmao
What if I dont have a home or I travel in my country.??....come to slab city TRAVELL TO AN UNKNOWN PLACE....break down and surrounded by crack heads and criminals.....see what you believe when 911 puts you on hold...it wont matter what you believe when your dead because you could not defend yourself....
You can buy a gun in any state from any drug dealer or criminal anywhere in any city...DUH...REALITY
Ben Legend we are talking about trafficking guns across borders stay on subject Ben. And we are going to outlaw people selling their private property?
What military weapon can a civilian own. Answer you can not own a military weapon so why does everyone think that a law abiding citizen can own a military weapon
KillerNinja869 Exactly. Even those in active duty military or reserve don’t have access to their weapon off base. It is locked up. My family and close friends are all military, active and vets. The misinformation about firearms and the laws around them are hindering a solution.
Modern military weapons built after 1986 you can't, but ones built before that are available on the military surplus market (M1 Garand, K98 Mauser, BAR, Thompson etc.).
Razgriz85
Very limited supply at exorbitant prices.
KillerNinja869 because you can. you can own military weapons made before 1986 and you can legally buy a kit to modify a gun to semi-automatic or automatic.
@@i.cantdrinkmilk most people cant afford military weapons before 1986 because the are so damn expensive. And i really don't think you can have a kit that can make per say an AR semi automatic and automatic because that would be very illegal to own.
**Several people are typing**
Matt From Wii Sports who knew matt from wii sports was programed with a sense of humor
Best comment yet.
In India it could take a person anywhere between 8 months to a year to get a license to purchase and carry a firearm. If ones background and health checkup comes back with issues. Then the application is either rejected or subjected to further scrutiny which might take another year .
Exactly
Not American, your opinion means nothing.
@@8bhushan8 I find that to be reasonable inconvenience to bare for public security. i even like the fact that all fire arms have to deposited with licensed dealers before every election.
The Brady Bill was signed into law by Bill Clinton on November 30, 1993. James Brady was shot on March 30, 1981 (he lived and was there when Clinton signed the bill). The legislation was first introduced to Congress February 4, 1987. It was not a "someone important got shot and they immediately set about changing the laws." What the Brady Bill actually did was to mandate federal background check on firearm purchases in the US (FEDERAL, so no it doesn't change from state to state) It also set a 5 day waiting period until the implementation of the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) in 1998. For the background check the holder of a Federal Firearms License (FFL) initiates the background check by phone or computer. Most checks are determined within minutes. It does not take "way longer than 3 days" to get information on people where nearly all of our records are digitally stored.
That's actually completely false. Its also how Dylan Roof got his gun, despite that he shouldn't have been allowed to buy one. If a background check takes more than 3 days you are allowed to sell the gun anyway. Its called a default proceed.
Yes for people with a clean record they are usually very quick, but for people with red flags they take much longer to investigate. So the default proceed rule primarily benefits criminals and there were over 300,000 default proceeds in 2016. So its actually pretty damn common
Our lax guns laws are literally insane.
@@nerdstrangler4804 "Completely false?" Clean record or not most of them are very quick. Around 9% of cases require further investigation, so it's not that common. The FBI continues its investigations for up to 90 days, if it's determined that a transfer was made to a prohibited person the case is transferred to the ATF for firearms retrieval. To be clear I'm not against extending the waiting period on these default proceeds, but for the vast majority of cases they are resolved in under an hour.
It’s nice how Trudi and Don were respectfully disagreeing with each other, it really brought different points of view to the video.
Sorry to correct you but it's "were". Because "we're" is short for "we are". I just wanted to point it out bc I feel like a lot of people make that mistake.
@@sophiam.krager3815 When people type on their phones, it sometimes autocorrects were to "we're" even if it's wrong.
@@sophiam.krager3815 this is the nicest grammar nazi comment i have ever read lol
Don't call me. It was a typo lol. Fixed