In a situation exactly the same as Robinson, however, the only difference being the police officers failed to take hold of the perpetrator before they tussle (whereas in Robinson they did take hold of the perpetrator effecting the arrest) would the actions of the police in the similar case to Robinson still be viewed as a positive act? Or are they to be construed as an omission because they failed to take hold of the perpetrator effecting the arrest??
![Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company [1892] EWCA Civ 1](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/BZ6DdrKblN4/mqdefault.jpg)
![Ivey v Genting Casinos [2017] UKSC 67](/img/n.gif)
Very helpful. Thanks Marcus.
In a situation exactly the same as Robinson, however, the only difference being the police officers failed to take hold of the perpetrator before they tussle (whereas in Robinson they did take hold of the perpetrator effecting the arrest) would the actions of the police in the similar case to Robinson still be viewed as a positive act? Or are they to be construed as an omission because they failed to take hold of the perpetrator effecting the arrest??
I know this is coming in some form. Impact on duty of care and 3-step Caparo. Thanks Marcus!
this helped me so much with my tort summative essay; thank you so much
How come they are not doing thier jobs now! 😊
thank you so much , really helpful